The newsletter of the Metallurgical Society of The AusIMM | Vol 1 2013
In this edition: Notes from the Chair | New publications | Chartered Professionalism | Future of minerals research | MetPlant 2013
The Bulletin | MetSoc Committee | Social media
Notes from the Chair
The major event so far this year for
MetSoc was the launch of the 3rd Edition
of the ‘Mawby Volumes’, the
Australasian Mining and Metallurgical
Operating Practices (AMMOP)
overview of Australasian mining and
metallurgical practices. Several MetSoc
committee members worked on this over
a number of years and we acknowledge
John Canterford (who suggested the new
edition), Helen Stanton, who developed a
model template in conjunction with
Queensland Nickel and Andrew Newell,
and who further developed templates.
Peter Tilyard and I worked to gain
broader support and to propose a project
team and we owe much to Ian Gould and
Leigh Clifford for the former and to Rob
Burns (Project Manager) and John
Rankin (Editor) who became the key
people in the team.
Support from Jenni Stiffe, Kristy Burt
and Stephanie Omizzolo in the AusIMM
Publications team was crucial and the
AMMOP Committee chaired by Peter
McCarthy kept the project team on track.
The funding required to develop and
publish the volumes came entirely from
the industry contributions. The
descriptions of operations were written
by a large group of volunteers from the
companies. MetSoc has been proud to
have played a key role in initiating and
supporting the project, and we thank
everybody who was involved for a
superb publication.
Andrew Newell and Diana Drinkwater
have written an informative article about
why practising members should become
Chartered Professional. They also
explain Registered Engineer in
Queensland, and the implications here
are that other states are considering
registration for engineers.
Congress will be in Darwin this year on
26-28 April. There will be a meeting of
representatives from the societies and
MetSoc will be exploring ideas for new
society activities and avenues for funding
society activities. Any member with
suggestions is invited to contact David
Pollard.
The metallurgy conference this year is
MetPlant, in Perth 15-17 July. There will
be three associated short courses and a
site visit to a manufacturer of HPGR
rolls and large mill shells. A summary of
the themes is given separately. A listing
of metallurgy relevant conferences is
shown at the end of the newsletter, and it
includes Critical Minerals, Uranium,
MetPlant, Iron Ore and Geometallurgy.
Finally, we note the passing of Ron
Davey, a metallurgist who had a
significant effect on the understanding
and development of non-ferrous smelting
and refining in Australia and the world.
Rod Grant’s obituary for Ron was
published in the April edition of The
Bulletin.
David Pollard HonFAusIMM
Most readers will be aware of two
landmark AusIMM publications events
that took place in February.
A true milestone was the launch of
Australasian Mining and Metallurgical
Operating Practices, inscribed also as The
Sir Maurice Mawby Memorial Volume.
This is the third edition of what was
colloquially referred to as the Mawby volumes (published in 1980 and 1993).
The Metallurgical Society is proud of its
advocacy and support of this great project
and congratulates the project team
responsible. The technical contents, are as
we have come to expect from the previous
two editions, are of the highest standards
and are supported by excellent graphics
and illustrations. At 1920 pages it is
almost 400 pages longer than the previous
edition. It is available as a boxed set and
as a CD. To call it a ‘worthy addition to
any technical library’ is to do it a grave
injustice.
The first edition of the Cost Estimation
Handbook was produced in 1993. The
second edition is about 25 per cent bigger
and has come in under the radar amidst the fanfare of the AMMOP release. There is
no contemporary equivalent anywhere that
we know of. While AMMOP provides a
staggering amount of information, the
Cost Estimation Handbook is (as its name
suggests) more of a ‘how to’ publication
that, like AMMOP, every metallurgist
should own or have access to.
Congratulations to the steering committees
and reviewers on this publication.
Reviews for both publications are being
planned for inclusion in upcoming editions
of The Bulletin.
Metsoc thanks the many of its members
who contributed to these publications.
New editions of popular AusIMM publications by Peter Tilyard FAusIMM(CP)
New publications
To begin with, we need to define what a Chartered Professional
(CP) is, and what sets them apart from anyone else with minerals
-related tertiary qualifications. Clearly the word ‘professional’ is
significant, as it carries connotations of capability, experience,
wisdom, trustworthiness and elevated status.
Rick West, Vice-Chair of the AusIMM Board of Chartered
Professionals, defines a Chartered Professional in this way:
‘Chartered Professionals are members of a profession (in our
case, professionals who practise in the mining industry) who, as
a self-regulating professional group are accountable to their
peers. They have accepted an obligation to keep up to date with
developing knowledge in their major areas of practice, follow
and adhere to the various codes of practice used within their
industry and are regarded as having wide general experience,
people and planning skills and the ability to stand back and view
the big picture as well as their own assigned areas, such that
they assess, develop, learn and handle changing conditions and
they foresee and manage risk.’
At present metallurgy is one of six disciplines for which
AusIMM CP accreditation is awarded. The full list comprises:
Mining
Metallurgy
Geology
Environment
Management
Geotechnical (Mining).
Thus CP accreditation adds a new dimension to your
professional standing. Being a CP establishes you as an
experienced and qualified metallurgist with a commitment to
ongoing professional development. This accreditation indicates
your level of experience, which may be relevant for undertaking
consulting roles and will be recognised wherever you practice in
the world.
AusIMM Chartered Professional accreditation is also recognised
as a membership requirement for preparing reports under
Canadian NI-43 101. Your name is kept on a register by The
AusIMM, which can be accessed by anyone looking for
identifiable professionals in key minerals industry disciplines
such as geoscience, metallurgy and mining engineering.
The benefits to an individual of having CP accreditation go well
beyond recognition and personal prestige, however. As project
managers focus increasingly on risk management, it is becoming
common for professional registration to be a requirement for
engineering practice. In NSW, there is a new test for professional
negligence, which states that for the law to apply the person must
be a ‘practicing professional’. CP accreditation is a
demonstration that you meet this requirement.
Registration of CP accreditation and maintenance of standards is
overseen by the CP Board. By implication, a ‘professional’ can
be expected to be competent, to behave ethically and to stay up
to date, and it is the job of the CP Board to ensure that those who
hold CP accreditation meet these expectations. The By-Laws of
the Board of Chartered Professionals provide details of the
eligibility, behaviours and ethics expected of a CP.
The AusIMM is also an approved assessing authority for the
Board of Professional Engineers Queensland (BPEQ). Registered
Professional Engineer, Queensland (RPEQ) is a Queensland
Government requirement for metallurgists practising in
Queensland where they are involved in the process of preparing
and signing off on engineering construction drawings that are
subsequently built. This role can be either direct or indirect (eg
managing a team) and includes process calculations and
engineering designs. Other states such as Western Australia and
New South Wales are considering introducing this legislation.
An overview is presented on the BPEQ website.
The accreditation process through The AusIMM is based on the
Chartered Professional application form. The schedule of fees
(including GST) is as follows:
AusIMM Chartered Professional members – $220
AusIMM members – $385
Non-AusIMM members – $420
Once accredited by The AusIMM, a registration form is
completed with the Board of Professional Engineers Queensland
(BPEQ) (Form2 Application for Registration) along with an
application and the annual fee ($50.15 and $185.15 respectively).
So in summary, CP accreditation is an endorsement of your
proficiency as an engineer or metallurgist. To demonstrate your
CP accreditation you are permitted to use an individualised
Chartered Professional seal available either in electronic format
or as a rubber stamp, and you will be permitted to use the letters
CP after your name as part of your AusIMM membership post
nominal, either with or without being discipline specific (ie John
Citizen MAusIMM(CP), or Jane Citizen MAusIMM CP(Met)).
Applying for CP accreditation
Details of the requirements and the accreditation process can be
found and downloaded from The AusIMM website. Applications
can be made after at least five years of relevant experience in the
discipline being applied for and require the submission of a
current resume, a personal statement of competency
(demonstrating professional competence and adherence to a
professional code of ethics) and details of three sponsors who
can attest to the competency of the applicant. The application
form can be downloaded from The AusIMM website.
One important aspect of CP accreditation is a commitment to
maintaining your technical and professional skills. As stated in
the By-Laws:
‘Members shall continue their professional development
throughout their careers and shall actively assist and encourage
those under their direction to advance their knowledge and
experience’ (By-Law 7).
In this way you can be relied on to contribute directly and
indirectly to the professional advancement of the minerals
industry, by adding to the body of knowledge and expertise,
raising professional standards, ensuring the profession remains
dynamic and enhancing the professions public image.
The AusIMM currently waives all CP accreditation and audit
fees.
Chartered professionalism
Page 2
Being an AusIMM Chartered Professional (Metallurgy) by Andrew Newell MAusIMM(CP) and Diana Drinkwater MAusIMM
Page 3
Specific guidelines for Chartered Professional (Metallurgy)
The guidelines define a metallurgist as, ‘a professional who
either investigates, plans, designs or directly controls the
process of converting minerals produced by mining into primary
commodities of economic value in sufficient quantity to be used
in the manufacture of economic goods; or specifies or directly
controls the process of using suitable metals or alloys thereof or
other commodities in the manufacture of useful items.’
The AusIMM requires that metallurgy must be the applicant’s
main technical discipline and that they are a Member or Fellow
of The AusIMM. Applicants must also supply evidence that they
have at least five years of technical experience in either a broad
representative selection of the main facets of metallurgy, as
would be expected from an applicant with substantial operational
experience, or at least one specialist area of metallurgical
practice from the following list (provided for guidance, but not
expected to be exhaustive or comprehensive):
1. process investigation and testwork
2. flowsheet development and plant design
3. project appraisal
4. project planning and management
5. operational management
6. hydrometallurgy (including electrowinning)
7. roasting, smelting and refining
8. comminution and sizing
9. materials handling
10. coal washing
11. infrastructure management.
There is also a mechanism for transferring between disciplines,
for those professionals moving from technical roles into
management, the CP Board encourages you to apply for
accreditation under the discipline of Management. If you feel
that you can maintain the PD hours to keep both CP
accreditations you may do so but most professionals opt to resign
from their technical CP and devote their time to CP
Management.
The By-Laws of the Board of Chartered Professionals can be
found on The AusIMM website and provide details of the
eligibility, behaviours and ethics expected for a CP.
Maintaining your CP accreditation
Once admitted as a Chartered Professional, you are required to
maintain a logbook of your professional development (PD)
completing a minimum of 50 hours per year averaged over a
rolling three year period. PD includes attending courses,
workshops and conferences, preparing and presenting papers,
mentoring and many more activities (guidelines can be found on
The AusIMM website). A log book in spreadsheet format is
available here from the website. Log books are audited, typically
every three to five years. The AusIMM also recently released an
online logbook, which is available here.
Professional development involves two equally important
components:
1. formal education and engagement with technical
specialists
2. on-the-job skill enhancement via optimisation, project
work and site visits.
It is also important to demonstrate an engagement with the
metallurgical ‘community of knowledge’ and importantly this
should include mentoring and delivery of technical papers
(giving knowledge) as well as reading technical literature and
attending conferences and training courses (receiving
knowledge).
Chartered Professionals have a responsibility to keep records of
their PD activities and these must be available for audit. An
individual can expect to be audited once every three to five
years. Failure to meet the audit requirements, or an audit which
shows non-compliance with the CP requirements, will result in
removal of CP accreditation.
Management
The AusIMM keeps a Chartered Professional Register which is
managed by the Board of Chartered Professionals. The specific
objectives of the Board of Chartered Professionals are:
1. to ensure the fulfilment of the aims and objectives of the
Chartered Professional scheme which includes
accreditation of Chartered Professionals, and supervision
of a Professional Development scheme
2. to promote and ensure adherence to the highest possible
standards of competence, conduct and continuing
development amongst Chartered Professionals
3. to protect The AusIMM and its Chartered Professionals
from the actions of persons or organisations that might
erode the Chartered Professional standards of conduct
and probity
4. to act for Chartered Professionals in matters of common
concern and
5. to promote the interests of its Chartered Professionals by
maintaining and enhancing their status.
The AusIMM regularly liaises with kindred bodies and learned
societies within Australia and overseas including setting and
maintaining of standards, procedures for accreditation and
ethical matters.
Currently there are 1126 Chartered Professional members listed
on the AusIMM register. If you want to be included on this list,
please visit the AusIMM website.
Contribute
If you have any feedback, would like to make a suggestion or
contribute to the MetSoc News with an article or comment piece,
please email the Secretariat Donna Edwards via:
or alternatively contact Peter Tilyard via:
Contribute to MetSoc News
Chartered professionalism, continued
At the Delprat Lecture in Melbourne last year, David Pollard
made the observation that the whole area of research in the
minerals area appeared to have weakened substantially in
Australia over recent years. He questioned Professor Alban
Lynch (the Delprat Lecturer) about its future. In turn Alban
suggested I might be better able to comment on this.
The answer I gave was related to the cyclic nature of the industry
and really did not attempt to open up the complexity of the
question. I suspect it was neither the time nor place to do so. In
thinking about this after the event, maybe it would be useful to
expand my thinking on the topic.
There is no doubt that the industry is cyclic in nature. Alban
pointed out the drivers for this using copper and cement as
examples. During the 50s, 60s, 70s and part of the 80s he
showed that Australia led a wonderful era of world class
innovation particularly in the metalliferous industry. But since
then in the 90s and 00s the drivers were not there. The inference
was that this has led to a cyclic downturn in innovation (and
R&D support).
While this is probably true it fails to acknowledge the
complexity of the innovation process in the mineral industry.
When we look back over that 30 to 40 year successful period,
not only were there strong drivers for change but there were very
strong technical leaders in the industry and the R&D community.
One without the other would not have been sufficient for the
huge technical changes that were made.
Alban also mentioned AMIRA in this
context. The role of AMIRA was to ensure
that the interaction between the industry
technical leaders and the appropriate
research leaders was appropriately
managed. The synergy of this relationship
between the industry and research leaders
was the key to the successful innovation
that took place.
But we need to note the timeframes
involved. In the 50s, while there were strong leaders in the
industry, the research community was only just beginning to be
built. Their leadership strength became evident in the 60s. As
Alban pointed out some of the innovations that developed took
several decades to come to fruition.
Let us now look at some of the huge changes that have occurred
since the 80s. It has become much more international in its
focus. Furthermore the intermediate sized companies that played
such an important role in the earlier innovation period (eg Zinc
Corporation, Cobar Mines Pty Ltd, Bougainville Copper,
Aberfoyle) are largely gone. The current Australian
metalliferous industry is dominated by a few major organisations
(major on the world scale!) and a few smaller organisations.
There is still some evidence of strong technical leadership in
some companies which is leading to successful innovation. The
20 year work in Rio Tinto relating to mining equipment and rail
automation is one example. But they have had to tap world class
technical leadership in the research community from areas
outside what we have traditionally assumed is the minerals
research area. However, the high level technical leadership
evident in the previous period has, in my view, weakened over
the past couple of decades. There is less evidence of senior
management’s focus on technical innovation.
Successful innovation in the minerals industry is a 10-20 year
process but all our timeframes seem to have been severely
shortened. Management must respond to quite short term cost
issues. The necessary culture in technical teams that has taken
years to build can be destroyed overnight by cost cutting
exercises. Governments, too, who have traditionally provided
funding support for the research community, have severely
shortened their funding timeframes. This has left some quality
research teams with no guarantee they will survive the long
innovation grind.
As Alban pointed out the future areas of innovation for the
metalliferous industry must occur in areas like pre-concentration,
very fine grinding and classification. I suspect this, like the Rio
Tinto automation work mentioned earlier, will require research
leadership from areas outside the traditional minerals research
areas.
If we are to have another surge of successful innovation, we will
need to rebuild the strengths, both in the industry and in the
research community, that drove the highly successful period of
the 60s, 70s and 80s. And that will not happen quickly!
Will this be possible? Yes I am sure it will be. Will it happen in
Australia? I am not so sure. With the changed nature of the
Australian industry and the fact that Australia has become a very
expensive place to do business, I think we will not again be the
dominant player we were in the previous period. I think it is
more likely the centre of gravity of the innovation will move
overseas, perhaps, to places like China.
So what does this say for the future of university courses
producing graduates for the industry? You only have to look at
some of the figures coming from some overseas countries to
realise we are now a small fish in a very big pond. Companies
can source staff from anywhere around the world and will do so.
So while our courses will obviously still feed much of the
Australian industry’s needs, they will increasingly be competing
with a huge off-shore supply. Excellence and perhaps niche
areas will be required for them to remain competitive.
The question of the future of minerals research in Australia by Jim May, former Chief Executive of AMIRA (1968-94)
The future of minerals research
Page 4
If we are to have another surge of successful innovation, we will need to rebuild the strengths, both in the industry and in the research community, that drove the highly successful period of the 60s, 70s and 80s.
Page 5
MetPlant 2013 will be extended to two and a half days to allow
more papers to be presented. There will also be a Poster Paper
session running during the conference – poster presentations will
have full papers included in the Proceedings.
As always, the conference aims to present a snapshot of World’s
Best Practice in Metallurgical Design and Operating
Strategies and this year there are some very relevant themes
running through the program.
The collection of about 50 papers is particularly topical,
addressing many areas of current high interest. Abstracts are
available on the MetPlant 2013 website.
Keynote papers address some fundamental issues and questions
in designing plants, and this theme is followed through by
several papers including examination of the business case as a
crucial element of the design, challenges of projects at remote
sites, and integrated waste management and risk minimisation for
tailings dam design.
Re-configuring plants for changed feed, the viability of re-
furbished mills and integration of maintenance services are
topical subjects. Sustainability is the subject of several papers,
including the economic case for off-grid solar vs diesel, flotation
power optimisation, a study of how changes in metallurgy affect
environmental impact and closure, and the effect of equipment
sizing on efficiency and plant flexibility.
The two pre-conference short courses will be Sampling for
Process Control and Mill Reconciliation by Francis Pitard and
Heap Leaching: Uranium, Copper, Gold and Nickel by
Graeme Miller. More details about these course can be found on
the conference website.
Following the conference JKTech will present a short course on
Energy Efficient Comminution and a site visit will be offered
by Hofmann Engineering who manufacture HPGRs and large
mill shells as well large mining equipment.
Connect with The AusIMM across our various social media
www.twitter.com/theausimm | www.facebook.com/ausimm | www.youtube.com/theausimm
www.ausimm.com.au/rss/rss/xml | search LinkedIn Group: AusIMM
MetSoc Committee
David Pollard (Chair)
Peter Tilyard (Vice Chair)
Ben Murphy (Treasurer)
Diana Drinkwater
Simon Donegan
Dr Rod Grant
Richard Holder
Hans Liang
Dr Andrew Newell
Ben Sedgwick
Dr Philip Stewart
Secretariat and AusIMM contact:
Donna Edwards
Senior Coordinator,
Society and Committee Services,
The AusIMM
The AusIMM is not responsible for statements made or opinions advanced by authors in this publication and accept no liability (including liability in negligence) for and given no undertaking concerning the accuracy, completeness or fitness for the
If you would like to contribute to The Bulletin, please contact the Editor via
August edition Article proposal deadline 31 May
Regional Feature: New Zealand
New South Wales
Gold
Minerals Education
Health & Safety
October edition Article proposal deadline 31 July
Regional Feature: Vic/Tas
Geometallurgy
Mine Ventilation
Water in Mining
Resource & Reserve Estimation
Contribute to The AusIMM Bulletin