Date post: | 26-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | thomas-murphy |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Notes on Decision Tree Analysis
University of ChicagoGraduate School of Business
Introduction to Computer Based Models Bus-36102-81Mr. Schrage Spring 2003
Decision Trees and Decision Analysis
Environment: - A strategic decision must be made,
- Number of alternatives is small.
- Uncertainty plays a key role.
Examples:
Go/No-go decisions on a
-New product, process, or plant.
Why Do It Carefully?
- We are not good at computing probabilities,
e.g., combinations of events.
- We are careless in proposing subjective probabilities.
- We under-enumerate possible scenarios.
What Are Decision Trees?
It is a methodology for
1) Displaying the alternatives in a sequential decision problem.
2) Calculating expected values of the various alternatives.
a) Simple case:
All probabilities about future events are given.
b) More complex:
New information about future probabilities can be bought,
e.g., by market research, testing, clinical trials, etc.
Example
(Based on an example of Gary Eppen)
We are about to introduce a new line of garden tractors.
How much money should we spend on marketing?
A very reasonable simplification is that there are three levels of marketing effort we could use:
Aggressive
Basic
Cautious
Similarly, the market/economy has two possible outcomes:
Strong or Weak.
So take the BASIC strategy and hope for a Strong market.
Note: We have assumed:
Linear utility, e.g., we are indifferent between:
.95 probability of a $1000 loss, and
.01 probability of a $95,000 loss.
That’s OK if this is one of many projects in a large firm…
So,
Prob{ market is strong, given study is encouraging}
= .270/.435 = .621
Prob{ market is weak | study is encouraging}
= .165/.435 = .379 ( = 1 - .621)
Prob { strong | discouraging} = .180/ .565 = .318
Prob{ weak | discouraging} = .385/.565 = .682
Sensitivity of Posterior Probabilities to Prior Probabilities
Prior Posterior
P(S) P(S|E) P(S|D) 0 0 0 .1 .18 .06 .2 .33 .13 .3 .46 .20 .4 .57 .28
.45 .621 .318 .5 .67 .36 .6 .75 .46
.7 .82 .57 .8 .89 .70 .9 .95 .84 1 1 1
Policy:
Make the study;
If it is encouraging, then take the Aggressive strategy.
If it is discouraging, then be Cautious.
The value of the study is $12.96M - $12.85M = $110,000
in excess of its cost.
Other Examples: Testing for HIV
ELISA test if very “sensitive”,
Prob{test negative | have HIV} .0001
Prob{test positive | not have HIV} .01;
Western Blot test is very “specific”,
Prob{test negative | have HIV} .001
Prob{test positive | not have HIV} .0001;
Western blot is expensive. About 1 in 300 people in U.S. are HIV positive.When should you use which test?
Example: Checking for Breast Cancer
Mammogram: Cost > $100;
60 out of 1000 women over 40 test positive on mammogram.
In fact 2.7 out of 1000 over 40 having mammogram have cancer.
Biopsy: Cost > $2000;
Essentially an exact test.
Should insurance be required to cover mammograms for women over age X?
Example: Spouse Battery and Homicide
O. J. Simpson was known to have battered his wife. She was murdered. What is the probability that O.J. did it?
Alan Dershowitz: FBI statistics show that out of 4M incidents of partner battery in 1992, there followed 1432 homicides by the partner. A 36 in 100,000 chance of subsequent murder provides essentially no support for the contention that O.J. did it.
Is Alan correct?
Other Federal statistics: In 1993, 5 out of 100,000 women were murdered by someone.
What is the relevant question?