Page 1
Nursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015 De Anza College Research 1
Nov 1st, 2015
TO: Olga Libova, Nursing Department
FROM: Mallory Newell, De Anza College Research
Stefan Trandafirescu, Student Assistant
SUBJECT: Nursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
A survey was sent by Nursing Program faculty to students of De Anza College enrolled in the Nursing
Program during Spring quarter 2015. A total of 176 students responded to the online survey.
Important highlights include:
94% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the out-of-class assignments (e.g., A.V.,
group activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives; the assigned reading and A.V.s for this
course were appropriate; the course has helped me to improve in clinical performance; and the
topics covered in exams and assignments for this course were consistent with the course
objectives.
95% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the course objectives were clear; the
objectives of the course were obtainable; the complexity of the course was appropriate for this
level; the out-of-class suggested reading and A.V. assignments were accessible; the tests (quizzes,
etc) in this course related to the course objectives; and compared to other courses in my major, I
would rate this course as effective.
87% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the required textbook for this course was
helpful for meeting the objectives.
89% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the assigned papers for this course
contributed to the achievement of course objectives and the course was well structured (ie., the
progression seemed logical).
88% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the amount of work required for this course
was appropriate for the credit received and the lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.
91% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the methods for presenting content were
effective.
95% of respondents “agree” or “strongly agree” that the class time allowed for discussion and
questions was appropriate.
Page 2
1. The course objectives were clear
Response %
Strongly Agree 104 59.1%
Agree 63 35.8%
Disagree 7 4.0%
Strongly Disagree 1 0.6%
No opinion 1 0.6%
Total 176 100.0%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable
Response %
Strongly Agree 95 54.6%
Agree 74 42.5%
Disagree 2 1.1%
Strongly Disagree 1 0.6%
No opinion 2 1.1%
Total 174 100.0%
3. The amount of work required for this course
was appropriate for the credit received
Response %
Strongly Agree 80 45.7%
Agree 67 38.3%
Disagree 19 10.9%
Strongly Disagree 8 4.6%
No opinion 1 0.6%
Total 175 100.0%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate
for this level
Response N %
Strongly Agree 82 46.9%
Agree 88 50.3%
Disagree 4 2.3%
Strongly Disagree 1 0.6%
No opinion 0 0.0%
Total 175 100.0%
54.6%42.5%
1.1% 0.6% 1.1%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable
45.7%38.3%
10.9%4.6% 0.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
3. The amount of work required for this course was appropriate for the credit received
46.9% 50.3%
2.3% 0.6% 0.0%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for this level
59.1%
35.8%
4.0% 0.6% 0.6%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
1. The course objectives were clear
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey,Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 1
Page 3
5. The required textbook for this course was
helpful for meeting the objectives
Response N %
Strongly Agree 71 40.6%
Agree 81 46.3%
Disagree 10 5.7%
Strongly Disagree 3 1.7%
No opinion 10 5.7%
Total 175 100.0%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg., A.V., group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course
objectives
Response N %
Strongly Agree 76 44.7%
Agree 83 48.8%
Disagree 4 2.4%
Strongly Disagree 2 1.2%
No opinion 5 2.9%
Total 170 100.0%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and A.V.
assignments were accessible
Response N %
Strongly Agree 78 45.1%
Agree 87 50.3%
Disagree 3 1.7%
Strongly Disagree 1 0.6%
No opinion 4 2.3%
Total 173 100.0%
8. The assigned reading and A.V.s for this
course were appropriate
Response N %
Strongly Agree 80 46.8%
Agree 81 47.4%
Disagree 5 2.9%
Strongly Disagree 1 0.6%
No opinion 4 2.3%
Total 171 100.0%
40.6%46.3%
5.7% 1.7% 5.7%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for meeting the objectives
45.1% 50.3%
1.7% 0.6% 2.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and A.V. assignments were accessible
44.7% 48.8%
2.4% 1.2% 2.9%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg., A.V., group activities, etc) were relevant to the
course objectives
46.8% 47.4%
2.9% 0.6% 2.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
8. The assigned reading and A.V.s for this course were appropriate
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey,Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 2
Page 4
9. The tests (quizzes, etc.) in this course related
to the course objectives
Response N %
Strongly Agree 94 54.0%
Agree 71 40.8%
Disagree 4 2.3%
Strongly Disagree 2 1.1%
No opinion 3 1.7%
Total 174 100.0%
10. The assigned papers for this course
contributed to the achievement of course
objectives
Response N %
Strongly Agree 77 44.0%
Agree 76 43.4%
Disagree 7 4.0%
Strongly Disagree 2 1.1%
No opinion 13 7.4%
Total 175 100.0%
11. The course was well structured (ie., the
progression seemed logical)
Response N %
Strongly Agree 84 48.0%
Agree 74 42.3%
Disagree 10 5.7%
Strongly Disagree 4 2.3%
No opinion 3 1.7%
Total 175 100.0%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course
were appropriate
Response N %
Strongly Agree 89 50.9%
Agree 73 41.7%
Disagree 10 5.7%
Strongly Disagree 2 1.1%
No opinion 1 0.6%
Total 175 100.0%
54.0%40.8%
2.3% 1.1% 1.7%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
9. The tests (quizzes, etc.) in this course related to the course objectives
44.0% 43.4%
4.0% 1.1% 7.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to the achievement of course
objectives
48.0%42.3%
5.7% 2.3% 1.7%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
11. The course was well structured (ie., the progression seemed logical)
50.9%41.7%
5.7% 1.1% 0.6%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were appropriate
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey,Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 3
Page 5
13. Class time allowed for discussion and
questions was appropriate
Response N %
Strongly Agree 93 54.1%
Agree 71 41.3%
Disagree 5 2.9%
Strongly Disagree 2 1.2%
No opinion 1 0.6%
Total 172 100.0%
14. The methods for presenting content were
effective
Response N %
Strongly Agree 85 48.9%
Agree 74 42.5%
Disagree 11 6.3%
Strongly Disagree 3 1.7%
No opinion 1 0.6%
Total 174 100.0%
15. The course has helped me to improve in
clinical performance
Response N %
Strongly Agree 84 48.6%
Agree 77 44.5%
Disagree 6 3.5%
Strongly Disagree 3 1.7%
No opinion 3 1.7%
Total 173 100.0%
16. The topics covered in exams and
assignments for this course were consistent
with the course objectives
Response N %
Strongly Agree 81 46.6%
Agree 88 50.6%
Disagree 3 1.7%
Strongly Disagree 1 0.6%
No opinion 1 0.6%
Total 174 100.0%
54.1%41.3%
2.9% 1.2% 0.6%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions was appropriate
48.9%42.5%
6.3% 1.7% 0.6%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
14. The methods for presenting content were effective
48.6% 44.5%
3.5% 1.7% 1.7%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical performance
46.6% 50.6%
1.7% 0.6% 0.6%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for this course were consistent
with the course objectives
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey,Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 4
Page 6
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I
would rate this course as effective
Response N %
Strongly Agree 83 48.0%
Agree 75 43.4%
Disagree 4 2.3%
Strongly Disagree 3 1.7%
No opinion 8 4.6%
Total 173 100.0%
48.0% 43.4%
2.3% 1.7% 4.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
No opinion
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would rate this course as effective
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey,Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 5
Page 7
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 104 59% 63 36% 7 4% 1 1% 175 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 95 55% 74 43% 2 1% 1 1% 172 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.80 46% 67 39% 19 11% 8 5% 174 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.82 47% 88 50% 4 2% 1 1% 175 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.71 43% 81 49% 10 6% 3 2% 165 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
76 46% 83 50% 4 2% 2 1% 165 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.78 46% 87 51% 3 2% 1 1% 169 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.80 48% 81 49% 5 3% 1 1% 167 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.94 55% 71 42% 4 2% 2 1% 171 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 77 48% 76 47% 7 4% 2 1% 162 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).84 49% 74 43% 10 6% 4 2% 172 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.89 51% 73 42% 10 6% 2 1% 174 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.93 54% 71 42% 5 3% 2 1% 171 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.85 49% 74 43% 11 6% 3 2% 173 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.84 49% 77 45% 6 4% 3 2% 170 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
81 47% 88 51% 3 2% 1 1% 173 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.83 50% 75 45% 4 2% 3 2% 165 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Total Results by Question, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 6
Page 8
NURS81
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 20 80% 5 20% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 19 79% 5 21% 0 0% 0 0% 24 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.17 68% 8 32% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.15 60% 10 40% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.14 58% 10 42% 0 0% 0 0% 24 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
14 56% 11 44% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.10 43% 13 57% 0 0% 0 0% 23 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.13 52% 12 48% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.16 64% 9 36% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 11 44% 13 52% 1 4% 0 0% 25 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).16 64% 9 36% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.14 56% 11 44% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.15 60% 10 40% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.13 52% 12 48% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.15 63% 9 38% 0 0% 0 0% 24 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
14 56% 11 44% 0 0% 0 0% 25 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.13 57% 10 43% 0 0% 0 0% 23 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 7
Page 9
NURS81P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 10 56% 7 39% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 7 39% 11 61% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.2 11% 4 22% 9 50% 3 17% 18 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.3 17% 14 78% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.6 33% 11 61% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.5 31% 11 69% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.6 40% 9 60% 0 0% 0 0% 15 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.7 39% 11 61% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 6 38% 9 56% 1 6% 0 0% 16 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).4 22% 13 72% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.6 33% 12 67% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.9 50% 9 50% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.5 28% 11 61% 2 11% 0 0% 18 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.4 24% 11 65% 2 12% 0 0% 17 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
4 22% 14 78% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.6 40% 9 60% 0 0% 0 0% 15 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 8
Page 10
NURS82
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 13 65% 7 35% 0 0% 0 0% 20 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 9 47% 10 53% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.9 47% 10 53% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.9 47% 10 53% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.14 74% 5 26% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
9 47% 10 53% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.10 53% 9 47% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.12 63% 7 37% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.11 61% 6 33% 0 0% 1 6% 18 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 10 56% 8 44% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).12 63% 7 37% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.14 74% 5 26% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.13 68% 6 32% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.13 68% 6 32% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.14 74% 5 26% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
9 50% 9 50% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.14 74% 5 26% 0 0% 0 0% 19 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 9
Page 11
NURS82P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.4 33% 4 33% 4 33% 0 0% 12 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.4 33% 8 67% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.3 27% 7 64% 1 9% 0 0% 11 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 36% 7 64% 0 0% 0 0% 11 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.8 67% 4 33% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).7 58% 5 42% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.8 67% 4 33% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.6 50% 5 42% 1 8% 0 0% 12 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.5 50% 5 50% 0 0% 0 0% 10 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 10
Page 12
NURS83
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 5 28% 11 61% 2 11% 0 0% 18 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 4 24% 12 71% 1 6% 0 0% 17 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.4 22% 11 61% 2 11% 1 6% 18 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.4 22% 13 72% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.2 13% 9 60% 3 20% 1 7% 15 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 22% 11 61% 3 17% 0 0% 18 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.3 17% 13 72% 2 11% 0 0% 18 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.4 25% 9 56% 3 19% 0 0% 16 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.5 28% 12 67% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 4 25% 9 56% 3 19% 0 0% 16 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).3 18% 7 41% 6 35% 1 6% 17 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.4 22% 8 44% 6 33% 0 0% 18 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.5 28% 10 56% 3 17% 0 0% 18 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.2 11% 11 61% 5 28% 0 0% 18 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.4 22% 12 67% 1 6% 1 6% 18 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
6 33% 11 61% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.3 18% 13 76% 0 0% 1 6% 17 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 11
Page 13
NURS83A
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.5 36% 7 50% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.4 29% 9 64% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 33% 8 67% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.4 29% 9 64% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.3 21% 10 71% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.6 43% 6 43% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).6 46% 6 46% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.6 43% 8 57% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 46% 6 46% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.5 38% 7 54% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
5 36% 8 57% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.4 29% 9 64% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 12
Page 14
NURS83P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.5 36% 8 57% 0 0% 1 7% 14 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.3 25% 8 67% 0 0% 1 8% 12 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 29% 10 71% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.4 31% 9 69% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.4 29% 9 64% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 4 31% 9 69% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 43% 8 57% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 13
Page 15
NURS84
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 16 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.15 88% 1 6% 1 6% 0 0% 17 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.11 65% 5 29% 1 6% 0 0% 17 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
14 82% 3 18% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.13 81% 3 19% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.16 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 14 82% 3 18% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).13 76% 4 24% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.13 81% 3 19% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.16 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.15 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
15 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.15 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 14
Page 16
NURS84C
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 11 50% 8 36% 3 14% 0 0% 22 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 12 57% 9 43% 0 0% 0 0% 21 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.10 45% 12 55% 0 0% 0 0% 22 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.11 50% 10 45% 1 5% 0 0% 22 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.6 32% 11 58% 2 11% 0 0% 19 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
9 43% 12 57% 0 0% 0 0% 21 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.11 52% 10 48% 0 0% 0 0% 21 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.10 50% 10 50% 0 0% 0 0% 20 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.11 55% 9 45% 0 0% 0 0% 20 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 11 69% 5 31% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).9 41% 11 50% 2 9% 0 0% 22 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.8 36% 12 55% 2 9% 0 0% 22 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.12 55% 9 41% 1 5% 0 0% 22 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.10 45% 10 45% 2 9% 0 0% 22 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.7 33% 13 62% 1 5% 0 0% 21 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
9 41% 13 59% 0 0% 0 0% 22 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.9 41% 11 50% 2 9% 0 0% 22 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 15
Page 17
NURS85
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 7 88% 0 0% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 7 88% 0 0% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.5 63% 2 25% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.5 63% 2 25% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
7 88% 0 0% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.4 50% 3 38% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 5 63% 2 25% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).5 63% 2 25% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
5 63% 2 25% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 16
Page 18
NURS85A
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 2 40% 2 40% 1 20% 0 0% 5 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.1 25% 1 25% 0 0% 2 50% 4 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.2 40% 3 60% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.2 40% 3 60% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
1 20% 3 60% 0 0% 1 20% 5 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.2 40% 3 60% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.2 40% 3 60% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.3 60% 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).1 25% 2 50% 0 0% 1 25% 4 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.3 75% 1 25% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.2 40% 2 40% 1 20% 0 0% 5 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
1 20% 4 80% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 17
Page 19
NURS86
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 2 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 2 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 2 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 2 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 18
Page 20
Clavijo 81P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 10 56% 7 39% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 7 39% 11 61% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.2 11% 4 22% 9 50% 3 17% 18 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.3 17% 14 78% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.6 33% 11 61% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.5 31% 11 69% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.6 40% 9 60% 0 0% 0 0% 15 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.7 39% 11 61% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 6 38% 9 56% 1 6% 0 0% 16 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).4 22% 13 72% 1 6% 0 0% 18 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.6 33% 12 67% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.9 50% 9 50% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.5 28% 11 61% 2 11% 0 0% 18 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.4 24% 11 65% 2 12% 0 0% 17 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
4 22% 14 78% 0 0% 0 0% 18 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.6 40% 9 60% 0 0% 0 0% 15 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 19
Page 21
Clavijo 82P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.4 33% 4 33% 4 33% 0 0% 12 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.4 33% 8 67% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.3 27% 7 64% 1 9% 0 0% 11 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 36% 7 64% 0 0% 0 0% 11 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.8 67% 4 33% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).7 58% 5 42% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.8 67% 4 33% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.6 50% 5 42% 1 8% 0 0% 12 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
6 50% 6 50% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.5 50% 5 50% 0 0% 0 0% 10 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 20
Page 22
Cozzens 84
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 16 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.15 88% 1 6% 1 6% 0 0% 17 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.11 65% 5 29% 1 6% 0 0% 17 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
14 82% 3 18% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.13 81% 3 19% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.16 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 14 82% 3 18% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).13 76% 4 24% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.15 88% 2 12% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.13 81% 3 19% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.16 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 17 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.15 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
15 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.15 94% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% 16 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 21
Page 23
Hanna 81
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 20 20000% 5 5000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 19 19000% 5 5000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.17 17000% 8 8000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.15 15000% 10 10000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.14 14000% 10 10000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
14 14000% 11 11000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.10 10000% 13 13000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.13 13000% 12 12000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.16 16000% 9 9000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 11 11000% 13 13000% 1 1000% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).16 16000% 9 9000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.14 14000% 11 11000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.15 15000% 10 10000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.13 13000% 12 12000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.15 15000% 9 9000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
14 14000% 11 11000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.13 13000% 10 10000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 22
Page 24
Hanna 81P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 23
Page 25
Hanna 85
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 24
Page 26
Hanna 85A
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 25
Page 27
Hrycyk 83
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 2 50% 2 50% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.1 25% 2 50% 0 0% 1 25% 4 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 3 75% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.1 25% 3 75% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.1 25% 3 75% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 1 33% 1 33% 1 33% 0 0% 3 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 0 0% 4 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.1 25% 2 50% 0 0% 1 25% 4 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
2 50% 2 50% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.1 25% 3 75% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%
0
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 26
Page 28
Hrycyk 83A
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 7 54% 6 46% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 7 54% 6 46% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.5 38% 6 46% 2 15% 0 0% 13 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.7 54% 6 46% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.4 31% 9 69% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 36% 7 64% 0 0% 0 0% 11 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.4 31% 8 62% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.3 23% 9 69% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.6 46% 5 38% 2 15% 0 0% 13 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).6 50% 5 42% 1 8% 0 0% 12 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.6 46% 7 54% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.5 42% 7 58% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 50% 5 42% 1 8% 0 0% 12 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.5 42% 6 50% 1 8% 0 0% 12 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
5 38% 7 54% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.4 31% 8 62% 1 8% 0 0% 13 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 27
Page 29
Hrycyk 83P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.5 36% 8 57% 0 0% 1 7% 14 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.3 25% 8 67% 0 0% 1 8% 12 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
4 29% 10 71% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.4 31% 9 69% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.4 29% 9 64% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 4 31% 9 69% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).7 50% 7 50% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.5 38% 8 62% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.6 43% 8 57% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.5 36% 9 64% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 28
Page 30
Libova 83
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 3 21% 9 64% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 3 23% 10 77% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.3 21% 9 64% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.4 29% 10 71% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.1 9% 6 55% 3 27% 1 9% 11 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
3 21% 9 64% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.2 14% 10 71% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.3 25% 7 58% 2 17% 0 0% 12 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.4 29% 10 71% 0 0% 0 0% 14 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 3 23% 8 62% 2 15% 0 0% 13 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).1 8% 6 46% 5 38% 1 8% 13 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.3 21% 6 43% 5 36% 0 0% 14 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.4 29% 8 57% 2 14% 0 0% 14 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.1 7% 9 64% 4 29% 0 0% 14 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.3 21% 10 71% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
4 29% 9 64% 1 7% 0 0% 14 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.2 15% 10 77% 0 0% 1 8% 13 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 29
Page 31
Libova 83A
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 30
Page 32
Libova 83P
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 31
Page 33
ONeill 84C
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 32
Page 34
ONeill 86
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 33
Page 35
Peurifoy 82
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 34
Page 36
Sherwood 85
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 35
Page 37
Sherwood 85A
Question N % N % N % N % N %
1. The course objectives were clear. 1 1000% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
2. The objectives of the course were obtainable. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
3. The amount of work required for this course was
appropriate for the credit received.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
4. The complexity of the course was appropriate for
this level.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
5. The required textbook for this course was helpful for
meeting the objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
6. The out-of-class assignments (eg AV, group
activities, etc) were relevant to the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
7. The out-of-class suggested reading and AV
assignments were accessible.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
8. The assigned reading and AVs for this course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
9. The tests (quizzes, etc) in this course related to the
course objectives.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
10. The assigned papers for this course contributed to
the achievement of course objectives. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
11. The course was well structured (i.e., the
progression seemed logical).0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
12. The lectures/demonstrations in the course were
appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
13. Class time allowed for discussion and questions
when appropriate.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
14. The methods for presenting content were effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
15. The course has helped me to improve in clinical
performance.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
16. The topics covered in exams and assignments for
this course were consistent with the course objectives.
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
17. Compared to other courses in my major, I would
rate this course as effective.0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100%
Nursing Theory Survey Results by Course and Instructor, Spring -2015
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Stefan TrandafirescuNursing Program Theory Survey, Spring 2015
De Anza College Research 36
