+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Nuclear Education: The U.S. Experience

Nuclear Education: The U.S. Experience

Date post: 03-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
17
Nuclear Education: The U.S. Experience Kent Hamlin Director Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1 st National Meeting on Improving Education and Training For Chinese Nuclear Power Industry Personnel May 25-29, 2009 Harbin, China
Transcript

Nuclear Education: The U.S. Experience

Kent HamlinDirector

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations1st National Meeting on Improving Education and

Training For Chinese Nuclear Power Industry PersonnelMay 25-29, 2009

Harbin, China

Nuclear Education: The U.S. Experience

Credit goes to

John GutteridgeManager, Nuclear Education Program

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

• Quick view– 104 nuclear plants– 20% of the nation’s electricity

U.S. Nuclear Energy Facts

– Displaces 680 million metric tons of CO2/yr

– Equivalent to 131 millionpassenger cars/yr

'82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

Cap

acity

Fac

tor (

%)

Proven Performance

Source: Energy Information Administration/Nuclear Regulatory Commission

92%

U.S. Energy DemandAmerica Is Projected to Need 50% More

Electricity by 2025

Source: U.S. Department of Energy

1980 19901970 2003 2015 2025

5,787BkWh

3,839BkWh

Existing or Expected Applications in the U.S.

Reactor Type Number

AP1000 (Westinghouse) 12 EPR (AREVA) 4

ABWR 2ESBWR (GE) 6

USAPWR 2Total 26

Evidence of U.S. Nuclear Revival— License Renewals

24Renewal

Intent

48Granted

17Not

Announced15In NRCReview

RenewalApplication

RenewalApplication

RenewalApplication

RenewalApplication

Source: Nuclear News, March 2008

History of Nuclear Education in the United States

Where We Were

• 1960’s – 1980’s - ~64 University Research Reactors- ~50 Nuclear Engineering Programs- 1800+ Students - Ordering and Building plants

Problems Arise

• Three Mile Island (1979)• Chernobyl (1986)• Rising cost of financing

Results In:• Loss of public support for nuclear energy• Cancelation of orders • Decline in nuclear engineering enrollments• Closing/merging of programs• Shutdown of research reactors

Addressing the Problem

• 1992 – Utility approaches US Department of Energy (DOE) (government) – Matching grant program begins

• Mid to late 1990’s– Effort revives several programs

Progress Suspended….Resumed

• 2006 – US DOE relinquishes program

• 2007 – US NRC education curriculum program begins

• 2008 – US Congress “moves” grant program to NRC

NE Enrollment Trends(2004-2009)

1520 1831 1933 2102 2323

10921110 1153

12391482

0500

1000150020002500300035004000

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009

Undergraduate Graduate

26122941 3086

33413805

Nuclear Engineering Enrollments and Graduations - 2008-09

9109

2412

32

428

5163

2526

1752

4462

2230

11482

6715

5553

10269

10781

11386

10

12

455470

3960

57133

12846

82101

158125

152116

158125

166136

253

4103

32

18

4208

44

5

204

1934

3518

1113

222623

2029

23

1

36

5

193

13

175515

1418

3132

3117

302522

3045

21

18

2

12

36

46

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Colo S/MUtah

Nevada – Las VegasAF InstituteCincinnati

IdahoMaryland

Massachusetts – LowellTexas – Austin

South Carolina StateSouth Carolina

Missouri – ColumbiaOhio State

Kansas StateIdaho State

New MexicoVA Tech

CAL – BerkeleyRPI

FloridaMIT

Wisconsin – MadisonIllinois

Missouri S&TPurdue

North Carolina StateMichigan

Georgia TechOregon State

TennesseePenn StateTexas A&M

Graduate Undergraduate Graduations - G Graduations - U

2008 NRC Results• Program addresses

– Nuclear Engineering– Health Physics– Radiochemistry

• $15M – For Scholars, Fellows, Trade Schools/Community Colleges and Faculty Development

• Half of 99 applications funded• 19 of 25 states; 33 of 49 institutions

Current Status• New Nuclear Engineering programs• Partnerships with Community Colleges (2 year

associates degrees)– Address craft and trade areas– Exists at most US NPPs

• Redesign WHERE the training and education takes place.

• Common curricula– Developed from National Academy for Nuclear

Training Guidelines– Shift training and education to colleges

Closing Thoughts• Several US nuclear plants likely to be

ordered in the near term

• 2015-2020; more plant orders are likely

• Meanwhile, workforce concerns are being addressed by unlikely forces:– Economic conditions impacting retirements– Slowdown of electricity demand


Recommended