1
1
Nuclear Physics
Phys 1020, Lecture 25:
Nuclear fusionNuclear radiation and you
FCQ – Finley.
Reminders:
Check your scores are correct on D2LReview session schedule on website
Grading schedule on website.
Final – Wed May 4th 1.30-4pm, G125Review lecture Thursday
• Structure of an atom and nucleus
• Nuclear forces and stored energy
• Nuclear fission- Alpha decay (spontaneous)
- Fission bomb (neutron induced fission)
• Nuclear Fusion
• Radioactivity and ionizing radiation
- Alpha, beta and gamma radiation- Why its bad for you
• Other interesting stuff that we won’t have time for- Nuclear power
- Nuclear medicine
Nuclear Physics
Sadly, (or perhaps much to your relief), demos will be limited……
3
If don’t get swallowed or lost
the 3 free neutrons can goinduce more fission.
For a bomb we must have a CHAIN REACTION:
(Must release energy from many many fission reactions all at once)
- Neutron source to start things off
- Chunk of neutron fissionable material (235U , Pu)
- Each fission must produce more than one neutron that can fissionother nuclei
- Neutrons must be used efficiently to trigger more fission (not
escape through surface or be absorbed)- Small surface to volume ratio (sphere)
- Super-critical mass
- Pure fissionable material
Details of a fission bomb
Ur 235
Energy released during fusion reaction
Initial
nuclei
Product
nucleus
Energy
released
per
nucleon
Energy released because product nucleus are MORE tightly bound
(in bigger potential hole)
5
Deuterium on
Tritium
Fusion bomb or “hydrogen bomb”
- Same process that powers the sun
- Stick small nuclei together to release energy
Which will release more energy during fusion?
a. Deuterium combining with deuteriumb. Deuterium combining with tritium
Deuterium on
Deuterium
PE
r r
6
Stick hydrogen isotopes
together to make helium.
• Must supply energy to force H nuclei together – use a fission bomb.
• More energy per unit mass than fission. • No limit to size of bomb (unlike fission)
• End up with GIGANTIC bombs
- 1000 times bigger than first fission bombs
Fusion bomb
+ =2H 3H 4He
+
1n
+ ENERGY
push together
energy required
energy released if
push over the hump
activation energy of
100 million degrees
PE
r
2
7
hydrogen isotopes:
tritium,deuterium
Pu
‘trigger’
chemical explosive
chemical explosive
Fusion bomb
3. Pu fission bomb
explodes
2. Chemical explosion
assembles super-critical mass of Pu
4. 3H, 2H forced
together and form 4He
1. Pu triggers shaped and
assembled at Rocky Flats
8
Energy comparisons:
1 fission of Uranium 235 releases:
~10-11 Joules of energy
1 fusion event of 2 hydrogen atoms:
~10-12 Joules of energy
Burning 1 molecule of TNT releases:
~10-18 Joules of energy
1 green photon:
~10 -19 Joules of energy
Dropping 1 quart of water 4 inches ~ 1J of energy
Useful exercise… compare energy available in this volume of TNT, H2, and U235
9
In the first plutonium bomb a 6.1 kg sphere of plutonium was used and the explosion produced the energy
equivalent of 22 ktons of TNT = 8.8 x 1013 J.
As the textbook says, 17% of the plutonium atomsunderwent fission.
How long would this power your house?
(assume you use 10 ×100W lightbulbs = 1000W)
More energy comparisons
a) 2days
b) 3 months
c) 6 years
d) 700 years
e) 3000 years
10
US Nuclear weapons
US sizes = 170kTon-310kTon
Russian as large as 100MTon
11
Immediate:
• Hideous amounts of energy -heat
-high energy particles (electrons, neutrons, x-rays, gamma-rays)
• Heat up air and blow everything in vicinity down• Exposure to massive amounts of ionizing radiation (photons and high
energy particles) causes death
Delayed:
• Radioactive daughter nuclei produced and dispersed.• These decay, producing ionizing radiation over a wide range of ½ lives
Destruction caused by a nuclear explosion
Ionizing radiation…
…the invisible ‘bad stuff’ released from nuclear reactions…
….but what exactly is it?
Ionizing radiation
In the early part of the 20th century, scientists observed many strange phenomena.
They did not know what these things really were (e.g. particles, light, other…) so
gave them random names.
X-rays
3
X-ray’s to see how well the bones in your foot fit
into that new shoe.• Natural radioactive decay from an unstable nucleus:
• Discovered by Bequerel in 1896
• Uranium fogged a photographic plate despite being wrapped in black paper.
• Curies discovered other elements that did the same thing (radium and
polonium)
• But what was the ‘radiation’ that uranium was emitting made of?
• Curies recognized
• different types of radiation were being emitted
• that the radiation had some properties in common with X rays.
• Rutherford called these 3 new types of radiation alpha, beta, and gamma.
Alpha, beta and gamma radiation
Marie Curie discovered “radium” (a new element at that time, and it
was naturally radioactive or unstable).• All these strange phenomena are now recognized as ionizing radiation.
• Radiation: Energy that radiates from a source and travels through space.
• Ionizing radiation: Particle or photon of radiation must have enough
energy to break a chemical bond
Ionizing radiation
• Types of ionizing radiation:
- Helium nuclei (alpha particles)- Electrons (beta particles)
- Photons (Higher energy UV, X rays, Gamma rays)
- Neutrons
• All ionizing radiation damages cells, including DNA molecules, causing
rapid death (high dose) or potentially cancer (lower dose)- Some types more damaging than others
- Some types easier to stop than others
• Radioactive nuclei/atoms are chemically identical to stable isotopes.
Can be absorbed by body/plants and then decay, causing damage.
Less damaging
Harder to stop
17
1. Alpha particles: high – speed helium nuclei
- Most of radiation is this type
- Easy to stop – clothes, paper, skin, couple of cm of air- Slows down, grabs electrons and become a He atom
- Only (but very) dangerous if ingested or inhaled (Litvinenko)
- Most common alpha emitter is radon- Dangerous because it’s a gas
- Gets into lungs, decays, a damages DNA of sensitive lung cells.
+ +
as don’t get far - because they hit things
18
2. Beta particles: High speed electrons
• Emitted when a neutron in a nucleus turns into a proton• Smaller and lighter than alpha particles
• Less damaging but more penetrating
• Stopped by a few mm of aluminum
3. Gamma rays: High energy photons
• Emitted when a nucleus drops to a lower energy state• No mass or charge – more penetrating, less damaging
• Depending on energy, requires cm or m of heavy material
(lead, packed soil, concrete) to stop rays. Travels long way in air• Most pass straight through body, but lots of damage if absorbed
• Can cure as well as cause cancer………
.
En
erg
y
4
19
4. Neutrons
• Because they lack any charge, exceptionally penetrating
• But because they have mass, very damaging….nasty combo….
• Neutron activation can make other materials radioactive
• Shielding from neutrons requires many ft of H containing materials (water, also
concrete.)
• Damage to tissue depends on energy but always more damaging per J than β or γ.
20
An odd world…You find yourself in some diabolical plot where you are given an alpha (a)
source, beta (b) source, and gamma (g) source. You must eat one, put one in
your pocket and hold one in your hand. You …
a) a hand, b pocket, g eat
b) b hand, g pocket, a eat
c) g hand, a pocket, b eat
d) b hand, a pocket, g eat
e) a hand, g pocket, b eat
Have you ever been exposed to ionizing
radiation from nuclear processes?
A) Not as far as I'm aware
B) Only medical X-rays
C) Yes, once in a while from multiple sources
D) Yes, a number of times from multiple sources
E) I'm exposed all the time, continuously.
22
Millirem, is a measure of damage done to you by radiation, so it takes into account
- Amount of energy absorbed by your body
- How damaging the specific type of radiation is to biological tissue.
- Sievert is the SI unit measuring the same thing. 1 mSv = 100 mrem
23
Results of radiationdose in rem = dose in rad x RBE factor (relative biological effectiveness)
RBE = 1 for g , 1.6 for b, and 20 for a.A rad is the amount of radiation which deposits 0.01 J of energy into 1 kg of absorbing material.
+ primarily due to atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons by US and USSR in the 50’s and early
60’s, prior to the nuclear test-ban treaty which forbid above-ground testing.
Nuclear power generation
A hugely important issue for this and future generations
• Current status
• Safety facts and fears
• Pros and cons
5
United States of America
104 reactors with 99,000 MegaWatts
20% of electricity
In 1990, the Public
Service Company of
Colorado initiated
steps to
decommission the Fort
St. Vrain high
temperature gas
cooled reactor and to
convert the site to a
peaking plant, fired by
natural gas.Test reactor operated by the US Geological survey in Denver
Test reactors are used in almost every field of science: physics,
chemistry, biology, medicine, geology, archeology, and
environmental sciences
USA has 104 reactors with 99,000 MegaWatts
France alone has 59 reactors with 63,000 MegaWatts, 77% of
their electricity generation !
World has 443 reactors, 367,000 MegaWatts capacity.
USA electricity from nuclear ~ 20%
France electricity from
nuclear ~ 77%
Germany and Japan electricity from
nuclear ~ 25%
South Korea electricity from nuclear
~ 40%
The fraction of US electricity coming from nuclear plants over
the past 10 years has been:
A) steadily increasing
B) stayed about the same
C) steadily decreasing
D) not sure/other
How many people were killed in the
Three Mile Island nuclear accident in
1979.
A) 0
B) 10
C) 100
D) 1,000
E) 10,000
6
Fukushima accident
In 2011 a tsunami hit the coast of Japan and damaged the
cooling systems at the Fukushima nuclear power plant.
Over 19,000 people died that day.
What percentage of those deaths was related to the accident at
the nuclear power plant?
a. 100%
b. 75%
c. 50%
d. 5%
e. 0%
Advantages:
• No CO2 emissions Small impact on global warming
• No SO2, CO, NOx, particulates, etc.
• Basically (air) pollution free.
•Less radiation leakage in normal operation than coal burning.
•Safety record in US better than fossil fuels (despite 3 Mile Island).
• Uranium relatively abundant, relatively inexpensive.
• Quantity needed to mine is relatively small (compared to coal).
Recall “R/P” = resource amount / current production rate
~ “simple time to end”
It is about R/P ~ 150 years for Uranium fuel.
“Breeder” reactor technology would extend that to 1000’s of years.
How long will our (US) Uranium reserves last if we ramp up nuclear
energy to cover all our electrical needs, using present reactor
technology?
A) 30 years
B) 300 years
C) 1000 years
D) 5000 years
E) Even longer than that.
Disadvantages:
• Public fears
• “New” technology, hard to
understand, unknown risks
• Catastrophic failure can have severe consequences
• Radioactive waste disposal (how and where?)
• Nuclear weapon proliferation (fuel and waste can be reprocessed
for bombs).
• Reactor construction costs more than coal burning plant (in the
USA currently). Decommissioning is expensive.