+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics for...

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics for...

Date post: 02-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: hanga
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics for macromolecular microsphere composite hydrogel based on the TDGL equation Dating Wu * and Hui Zhang School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University Laboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, P. R. China * [email protected] [email protected] Received 19 June 2016 Accepted 7 October 2016 Published 28 October 2016 We present results of a detailed numerical investigation of the phase separation kinetic process of the macromolecular microsphere composite (MMC) hydrogel. Based on the Flory-Huggins-de Gennes-like reticular free energy, we use the time-dependent GinzburgLandau (TDGL) mesoscopic model (called MMC-TDGL model) to simulate the phase separation process. Domain growth is investigated through the pair correlation function. Then we obtain the time- dependent characteristic domain size, which re°ects the growth kinetics of the MMC hydrogel. The results indicate that the growth law based on the MMC-TDGL equation is consistent with the modi¯ed LifshitzSlyozov theory. Keywords: Phase transition; MMC hydrogel; MMC-TDGL equation; correlation function; growth rate. 1. Introduction Macromolecular microsphere composite (MMC) hydrogels, a kind of polymeric materials, have attracted some theoretical and experimental studies because of their well-de¯ned network structure. 16 The new hydrogel, as proposed in Fig. 1 predominately consists of MMS (macromolecular microsphere), chains and water molecules, which shapes its well-de¯ned structure and high mechanical strength shown in Figs. 2 and 3. But, how is it phase transition and forming these well-de¯ned micro-structure? Why the hydrogels have such high mechanical strengths? what is the structure-property relationship? How do the structural factors a®ect, such as nanoparticle size, grafting density, polymer chain length, entanglement, and so on? Theoretical studies may provide supports for optimizing the synthesis. Now there are many mathematical and physical work to help understand these questions. 413 Corresponding author. Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Vol. 15, No. 8 (2016) 1650064 (19 pages) # . c World Scienti¯c Publishing Company DOI: 10.1142/S0219633616500644 1650064-1 J. Theor. Comput. Chem. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by WSPC on 11/07/16. For personal use only.
Transcript

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics for macromolecular

microsphere composite hydrogel based on the TDGL equation

Dating Wu* and Hui Zhang†

School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal UniversityLaboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems

Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, P. R. China*[email protected]

[email protected]

Received 19 June 2016Accepted 7 October 2016

Published 28 October 2016

We present results of a detailed numerical investigation of the phase separation kinetic process

of the macromolecular microsphere composite (MMC) hydrogel. Based on the Flory-Huggins-deGennes-like reticular free energy, we use the time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau (TDGL)

mesoscopic model (called MMC-TDGL model) to simulate the phase separation process.

Domain growth is investigated through the pair correlation function. Then we obtain the time-

dependent characteristic domain size, which re°ects the growth kinetics of the MMC hydrogel.The results indicate that the growth law based on the MMC-TDGL equation is consistent with

the modi¯ed Lifshitz–Slyozov theory.

Keywords: Phase transition; MMC hydrogel; MMC-TDGL equation; correlation function;

growth rate.

1. Introduction

Macromolecular microsphere composite (MMC) hydrogels, a kind of polymeric

materials, have attracted some theoretical and experimental studies because of

their well-de¯ned network structure.1–6 The new hydrogel, as proposed in Fig. 1

predominately consists of MMS (macromolecular microsphere), chains and water

molecules, which shapes its well-de¯ned structure and high mechanical strength

shown in Figs. 2 and 3. But, how is it phase transition and forming these well-de¯ned

micro-structure? Why the hydrogels have such high mechanical strengths? what is

the structure-property relationship? How do the structural factors a®ect, such as

nanoparticle size, grafting density, polymer chain length, entanglement, and so on?

Theoretical studies may provide supports for optimizing the synthesis. Now there are

many mathematical and physical work to help understand these questions.4–13

†Corresponding author.

Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry

Vol. 15, No. 8 (2016) 1650064 (19 pages)

#.c World Scienti¯c Publishing CompanyDOI: 10.1142/S0219633616500644

1650064-1

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

Concerning the above questions, now theoretical results of ordered micro-struc-

tures could be obtained.12 Furthermore, there was a randomly micro-structure

model.14 But up to now, there is hardly numerical results about this model. For the

mechanical strength, G. W. Wei set up some multiscale models.11 Suo et al. present

some results.15–18 The phase transition process for hydrogel was investigated19–23

Fig. 2. Photographs of a MMC hydrogel during the compression test.

Fig. 1. An MMC hydrogel microstructure quoted from Ref. 1.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-2

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

and references therein. We presented the phase transition process of the MMC

hydrogel5 based on the time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau (TDGL) mesoscopic

equation, called the MMC-TDGL equation. The key point was to construct the free

energy of the MMC hydrogel. In that work,5 we did not use the traditional Flory–

Huggins free energy for polymer, but constructed a reticular free energy of the MMC

hydrogel. Then we could simulate the phase transition process and understand that

the system shows intermittent phenomenon with increasing reaction temperature,

which is a very good explanation of chemical experiments.

Here we will continuously investigate the growth kinetics for the MMC hydrogel.

The kinetics of phase separation of the MMC hydrogel is distinctive because one

needs to take the collective movements of the chains between molecules into account

in the process. Thus the important objectives in the study of the hydrogel phase

transition are: (1) to investigate universality in the dynamics of phase separation in

general; (2) to discover possible unique characteristics originating from the presence

of chains in the system. So the investigation of kinetics domain growth is deeply

meaningful.

For the self-consistence of this work, we ¯rstly present the reticular free energy

and the MMC-TDGL equation.5 In order to investigate the grow kinetics of the

MMC hydrogel, we have to choose robust and high e±cient numerical scheme to

compute. We design a semi-implicit di®erence scheme, which keeps conservation of

mass and descent of the total energy. So we claim that this scheme keeps some

physical properties reasonable for physical phenomena. Moreover we can rigorously

prove them. Further we numerically verify these properties.

In MMC-TDGL model, we adopt the Flory–Huggins-de Gennes-like reticular free

energy with the Huggins parameter �. As well-known, the Huggins parameter �

denotes the enthalpic interaction, which plays a critic role. So we show the di®erent

property by numerical calculation for di®erent �, such as double-well or one-well

Fig. 3. The stress–stain curves for the NS and MMC hydrogel: full range.

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-3

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

potential. These determine the number of states of the hydrogel system. During the

process of numerical calculations, the initial state consists of uniform distributions

with a small amplitude random °uctuations at an average value. Since the correla-

tion function is constructed in a statistical sense, we discrete the correlation function

on a spatial grid, and solve them many times then average the solutions. And it is

possible for the initial state to in°uence the growth of the characteristic domain size.

We will compute cases for di®erent initial data. As a conclusion, numerical investi-

gation suggests that the characteristic size RðtÞ of the domain follows a modi¯ed

Lifshitz–Sloyzov growth law,24 i.e. RðtÞ � t13 .

The paper is organized as follows: In Sec. 2, we introduce the Flory-Huggins-de

Gennes-like reticular free energy and the MMC-TDGL equation. In order to make a

quantitative analysis of the domain growth, we de¯ne the correlation function in the

last part of this section. In Sec. 3, we construct the semi-implicit di®erence scheme and

rigorously prove the scheme is descent of energy and conservation of mass. In Sec. 4,

we present our numerical experiments to illustrate the domain growth rate is con-

sistent with the modi¯ed Lifshitz-Slyozov theory. At last we draw the conclusions.

2. Dynamic Model

In this section, we will introduce the Flory-Huggins-de Gennes-like reticular free

energy and the MMC-TDGL equation to describe the phase transition of the MMC

hydrogel for the self-consistence.5 Then we de¯ne the correlation function to quantify

the characteristic domain size of the phase transition of the MMC hydrogel.

2.1. The reticular free energy

Now we denote the concentration of the polymer chains by � in the MMC hydrogel.

The Flory-Huggins-de Gennes-like reticular free energy density of the MMC

hydrogel4,5 as follows

V ð�Þ ¼ �

�ln

��

�þ �

Nln

��

�þ ð1� ��Þlnð1� ��Þ þ ��ð1� ��Þ; ð1Þ

where � is the temperature-dependent Huggins interaction parameter, which re°ects

the change of interaction energy between the polymer chains and water molecules.

The parameters �; �; �; � depend on the micro-parameters N , the degree of the po-

lymerization of the chains, and M, the lattice number of one MMS occupies through

the following relations

� ¼ cN ; c ¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiM�

p; � ¼ 1þ M

�;

� ¼ �

ffiffiffiffiffiffiM

p ffiffiffi�

p þ N

2

!2

; � ¼ �

c:

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-4

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

The details can be found.5 The relation of these parameters implies that,

�þ M

��þ ð1� ��Þ ¼ 1:

M� � represents the volume fraction of the MMS, and ð1� ��Þ is the volume fraction

of the solvent molecules. The Ginzburg–Landau free energy functional is of the

form4,5,25

F ð�Þ ¼Z�

�ð�Þjr�j2 þ V ð�Þ� �dr; ð2Þ

where � is the space domain occupied by the system. It should be three dimension.

But we choose two dimension for simple computation in the following. The �ð�Þ is apositive variable coe±cient given by de Genns7:

�ð�Þ ¼ 2

36�ð1� �Þ : ð3Þ

The parameter is the Kuhn segment length of the polymer.

2.2. MMC-TDGL equations

With the free energy F ð�Þ given by Eq. (2), the system evolution with time can be

described by the following equation:

@�

@tþr � jðr; tÞ ¼ 0; ð4Þ

where the di®usion current jðr; tÞ is de¯ned as

jðr; tÞ ¼ �D � r F

�ðr; tÞ ;

among which, F�ðr;tÞ represents the local chemical potential. D is the mobility, a

phenomenological constant. Without loss of generality, we set D ¼ 1 for the

following numerical computation.

We ¯rstly calculate the variational derivative F� from (2), and substitute it

into (4). Then we obtain the MMC-TDGL equation

@�

@¼ �½V 0ð�Þ � �0ð�Þjr�j2 � 2�ð�Þ���: ð5Þ

Now we choose r ¼ ðx; yÞ 2 ½0; d�2(d is a positive constant) and � is equipped with

the periodic boundary conditions, and

V 0ð�Þ ¼ 1

�ln

��

�þ 1

Nln

��

�� �lnð1� ��Þ þ �ð1� 2��Þ þ 1

�þ 1

N; ð6Þ

�0ð�Þ ¼ 2ð2�� 1Þ36�2ð1� �Þ2 : ð7Þ

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-5

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

Remark 1. There is a thermal noise term in Eq. (4) for a traditional TDGL

equation.4,5 Here the thermal noise has been omitted in the sense that the

characteristic domain size becomes much larger than the thermal correlation length

in the late time of the phase transition. Therefore, thermal noise does not play an

important role in the coarsening process, despite the thermal noise makes the phase

separations occur in the early time.23

2.3. Correlation function

Growth laws of the average domain size have been traditionally analyzed in terms of

the correlation function25

cðr; tÞ ¼ 1

L2

Xr0½�ðrþ r0; tÞ�ðr0; tÞ� < �ð�; tÞ>2�

* +; ð8Þ

here <> represents an average concentration of chains at time t, and hi denotes anaverage over the thermal noise. Supposing that the system is isotropic, then cðr; tÞdepends only on the radial distance, r ¼ jrj: A further circular average leads to the

radial pair correlation function

Cðr; tÞ ¼ 1

Nr

Xjrj¼r

cðr; tÞ; ð9Þ

where Nr is the number of lattice vectors of magnitude r. The correlation function

has two important features as follows:

(1) the self-correlation is largest, that is jCðr; tÞj � Cð0; tÞ;(2) when the distance r grows in¯nity, the radial pair correlation function nearly

disappears, i.e., limr!1;Cðr; tÞ ¼ 0:

Fig. 4. Diagram of spatial discretization.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-6

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

In the simulations, taking the square region of the system into account, the number

of lattice vectors of magnitude r, Nr equals to 1 for the diagonal line of the lattice,

and Nr equals to 2 for the nondiagonal line of the lattice, as shown in Fig. 4. The

distance at which Cðr; tÞ ¯rst crosses zero, denoted by RðtÞ, has been used as a

measure of domain size. With the random initial conditions, we solve the equation

many times for each series of initial conditions. Then we obtain the corresponding

correlation function, ¯nally we average the solutions.

Figure 5 shows the typical dynamical evolution of the radial correlation function.

The domain structure is apparent in the oscillations of the function about zero.

3. Semi-Implicit Di®erence Schemes

We will use the Euler method to approximate the time derivative of � °uctuation.

Thus we obtain the time-discrete scheme and semi-implicit di®erence scheme

�nþ1 � �n

4t¼ �½V 0ð�nÞ � �0ð�nÞjr�nj2 � 2�ð�nÞ��nþ1�: ð10Þ

With the space discrete h ¼ d=L and denote

�h�ij ¼�iþ1;j þ �i�1;j þ �i;jþ1 þ �i;j�1 � 4�i;j

h2;

jr�ijj2 ¼1

4h2½ð�iþ1;j � �i�1;jÞ2 þ ð�i;jþ1 � �i;j�1Þ2�;

Fig. 5. Time dependence of the radial correlation function. The blue dotted line corresponds to t ¼ 10;the red solid line corresponds to t ¼ 50.

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-7

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

we can obtain the complete discrete scheme as follows

�nþ1ij � �n

ij

4t¼ �h½V 0ð�n

ijÞ � �0ð�nijÞjr�n

ijj2 � 2�ð�nijÞ�h�

nþ1ij �; i; j ¼ 1; 2; . . . ;L:

ð11ÞWith periodic boundary condition, we will rigorously prove the scheme (11) keeps

the total energy decreasing and mass conservative in the following.

3.1. Descent of the total energy

Now we will rigorously prove the scheme (10) is satis¯ed that the total energy is

decreasing under this assumption.

Theorem 1. Assume that �nðr; tÞ solve the time-discrete scheme (10) with periodic

condition, Let

F ð�nÞ ¼Z�

½�ð�nÞjr�nj2 þ V ð�nÞ�dr; ð12Þ

then we have

Fð�nþ1Þ � F ð�nÞ þOð4t2Þ: ð13ÞProof. De¯ne the chemical potential

� ¼ V 0ð�nÞ � �0ð�nÞjr�nj2 � 2�ð�nÞ��nþ1: ð14ÞThen Eq. (10) can be written as

�nþ1 � �n

4t¼ ��; ð15Þ

By taking the inner product of (15) with �nþ1, we have

�;�nþ1 � �n

4t

� �¼ �jjr�jj2 � 0: ð16Þ

From the de¯nition of � in (14), we obtain

�;�nþ1 � �n

4t

� �¼ V 0ð�nÞ; �

nþ1 � �n

4t

� �þ �0ð�nÞjr�nj2; �

nþ1 � �n

4t

� �

þ �2�0ð�nÞjr�nj2 � 2�ð�nÞ��nþ1;�nþ1 � �n

4t

� �:¼ A1 þB1 þ C1: ð17Þ

Applying the following Taylor expansions

V ð�nþ1Þ ¼ V ð�nÞ þ V 0ð�nÞð�nþ1 � �nÞ þ V 00ð�Þ2

ð�nþ1 � �nÞ2; ð18Þ�nþ1 ¼ �n þ �tð�; Þ 4 t; ð19Þ

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-8

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

where � is between �n and �nþ1, is between tn and tnþ1. We have the following

equations for term A1, considering �t, V00 is bounded,

A1 ¼ V 0ð�nÞ; �nþ1 � �n

4t

� �

¼ 1

4t

Z�

V ð�nþ1Þ � V ð�nÞ � V 00ð�Þ2

ð�tð�; Þ 4 tÞ2� �

dr

¼ 1

4t

Z�

V ð�nþ1 � V ð�nÞ� �drþOð4tÞ: ð20Þ

We also consider the following Taylor expansions,

�ð�nþ1Þ ¼ �ð�nÞ þ �0ð�nÞð�nþ1 � �nÞ þ �0ð�Þ2

ð�nþ1 � �nÞ2;ð�xÞn ¼ ð�xÞnþ1 � �xtð�; 1Þ 4 t;

ð�yÞn ¼ ð�yÞnþ1 � �ytð�; 2Þ 4 t;

jr�nj2 ¼ jr�nþ1j2 � 2½ð�xÞnþ1 � �xt þ ð�yÞnþ1 � �yt� 4 tþ ð�2xt þ �2

ytÞ 4 t2

¼ jr�nþ1j2 þK1 4 tþK2 4 t2; ð21Þwhere � is between �n and �nþ1, i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ is between tn and tnþ1. If �0, �00, �x, �y,

�xt, �yt are bounded, then we have

B1 ¼ �0ð�nÞjr�nj2; �nþ1 � �n

4t

� �

¼ 1

4t

Z�

�ð�nþ1Þ � �ð�nÞ � �00ð�Þ2

ð�nþ1 � �nÞ2� �

� ðjr�nþ1j2 þK1 4 tþK2 4 t2Þdr¼ 1

4t

Z�

½�ð�nþ1Þ � �ð�nÞ þOð4t2Þ� � ½jr�nþ1j2 þOð4tÞ�dr

¼ 1

4t

Z�

½�ð�nþ1Þ � �ð�nÞ�jr�nþ1j2drþOð4tÞ: ð22Þ

We also calculate the term C1 as follows,

C1 ¼ � 2�0ð�nÞjr�nj2; �nþ1 � �n

4t

� �þ �2�ð�nÞ��nþ1;

�nþ1 � �n

4t

� �:¼ ~C1 þ ~C2 : ð23Þ

Since

2jr�nj2 ¼ 2ðð�xÞnÞ2 þ 2ðð�yÞnÞ2¼ ð�xÞn½ð�xÞn þ ð�xÞn� þ ð�yÞn½ð�yÞn þ ð�yÞn�¼ ð�xÞn½ð�xÞn þ ð�xÞnþ1 � �xtð�; 1Þ 4 t� þ ð�yÞn½ð�yÞn

þð�yÞnþ1 � �ytð�; 2Þ 4 t�¼ r�n � rð�nþ1 þ �nÞ þOð4tÞ: ð24Þ

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-9

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

Thus, we obtain

~C1 ¼ � 1

4t

Z�

�0ð�nÞð�nþ1 � �nÞ � ½r�n � rð�nþ1 þ �nÞ�drþOð4tÞ:

In virtue of the assumption that � is bounded, then �,��t also are bounded, we have

~C2 ¼ � 1

4t

Z�

�ð�nÞð�nþ1 � �nÞð��nþ1 þ��nþ1Þdr

¼ � 1

4t

Z�

�ð�nÞð�nþ1 � �nÞ � ð��nþ1 þ��n þ��tð�; �3Þ 4 tÞdr

¼ � 1

4t

Z�

�ð�nÞð�nþ1 � �nÞ � ð��nþ1 þ��nÞdrþOð4tÞ:

So we obtain

C1 ¼ ~C1 þ ~C2

¼ � 1

4t

Z�

ð�nþ1 � �nÞ½�0ð�nÞr�n � rð�nþ1 þ �nÞ þ �ð�nÞ

��ð�nþ1 þ �nÞ�drþOð4tÞ¼ � 1

4t

Z�

ð�nþ1 � �nÞ � r � ð�ð�nÞrð�nþ1 þ �nÞÞdrþOð4tÞ

¼ 1

4t

Z�

�ð�nÞrð�nþ1 þ �nÞ � rð�nþ1 � �nÞdrþOð4tÞ

¼ 1

4t

Z�

�ð�nÞðjr�nþ1j2 � jr�nj2ÞdrþOð4tÞ: ð25Þ

Thus,

�nþ1;�nþ1 � �n

4t

� �¼ A1 þB1 þ C1

¼ F ð�nþ1Þ � Fð�nÞ4t

þOð4tÞ � 0: ð26Þ

This theorem shows that the total energy is decreasing for this scheme. It is a

physical law of the system.

3.2. Mass conservation

In the MMC-TDGL equations with the periodic condition, the unknown function

�ðr; tÞ is d-periodic with space. Then we have

Theorem 2. Assume that f�nþ1ij : i; j ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . . ;Lg solve the di®erence scheme

(11) and satisfy �nþ1i�L;j ¼ �nþ1

ij and �nþ1i;j�L ¼ �nþ1

ij ; then we have

XL�1

i;i¼0

�nþ1ij ¼

XL�1

i;i¼0

�nij; ð27Þ

where L is the total number of lattice at one side.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-10

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

Proof. Summing up the di®erence scheme (11) from i ¼ 0; j ¼ 0 to

i ¼ L� 1; j ¼ L� 1, we obtain,

XL�1

i;j¼0

�nþ1ij � �n

ij

4t¼XL�1

i;j¼0

�h½V 0ð�nijÞ � �0ð�n

ijÞjr�nijj2� ��h

XL�1

i;j¼0

ð�h�nþ1ij Þ:

Firstly, we ¯gure out the following term,

XL�1

i;j¼0

�h�nþ1ij ¼ 1

h2

XL�1

i;j¼0

ð�nþ1iþ1;j þ �nþ1

i�1;j þ �nþ1i;jþ1 þ �nþ1

i;j�1 � 4�nþ1i;j Þ

¼ 1

h2

XL�1

j¼0

XL�1

i¼0

ð�nþ1iþ1;j þ �nþ1

i�1;j � 2�nþ1i;j Þ

þ 1

h2

XL�1

i¼0

XL�1

j¼0

ð�nþ1i;jþ1 þ �nþ1

i;j�1 � 2�nþ1i;j Þ:

Obviously, we have the following property,

XL�1

i¼0

ð�nþ1iþ1;j þ �nþ1

i�1;j � 2�nþ1i;j Þ ¼

XL�1

i¼0

½ð�nþ1iþ1;j � �nþ1

i;j Þ � ð�nþ1i;j � �nþ1

i�1;j�

¼ ð�nþ1L;j � �nþ1

L�1;jÞ � ð�nþ10;j � �nþ1

�1;jÞ ¼ 0:

Similarly, we obtain

XL�1

i;j¼0

�h�nþ1ij ¼ 0;

XL�1

i;j¼0

�h½V 0ð�nijÞ � �0ð�n

ijÞjr�nijj2� ¼ 0:

Thus, we have the following property,

XL�1

i;j¼0

�nþ1ij � �n

ij

4t¼ 0:

This theorem shows that the total mass conserves in this scheme. It is also a

physical law of the system.

4. Numerical Result

In this section, we will present numerical results of the scheme (11). We will verify

the numerical accuracy of the scheme (11), the in°uence of the Huggins parameter �

and initial segment average concentration �0. At last it is investigated the growth

rate of the characteristic domain size. Before calculating the numerical tests, we

simplify the reticular potential V ð�Þ ¯rstly.

V ð�Þ ¼ �

�ln

��

�þ �

Nln

��

�þ ð1� ��Þlnð1� ��Þ þ ��ð1� ��Þ

¼ 1

�ln

�þ 1

Nln

� ��þ 1

�þ 1

N

� ��ln�þ ð1� ��Þlnð1� ��Þ þ ��ð1� ��Þ:

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-11

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

Noticing that the MMC-TDGL Eq. (5) is a fourth-order equation, so ignoring the

linear term ð1� ln �� þ 1

N ln �� �, we obtain,

V1ð�Þ ¼1

�þ 1

N

� ��ln�þ ð1� ��Þlnð1� ��Þ þ ��ð1� ��Þ;

which is simple and plays the same role in the equation. As proposed in Fig. 6, V1ð�Þhas two minima corresponding to the stable phase. We use the special potential V1ð�Þto substitute V ð�Þ in the whole calculation. We will apply the developed semi-

implicit di®erence scheme (11) to investigate the phase transition process of

the MMC hydrogel. The Eq. (5) is solved on a two-dimensional region � ¼½0; 50� � ½0; 50� with periodic boundary conditions. We set the structural parameters

M ¼ 0:16, N ¼ 4:34. The lattice size is 256� 256, and the time step is taken as

4t ¼ 0:001. The initial condition �0 ¼< �ðr; 0Þ > consists of uniformly distributed

small amplitude °uctuations at an average value in each step.

4.1. Numerical accuracy of the semi-implicit scheme

In order to test the numerical accuracy, we take the numerical solution obtained by

using 4t ¼ 10�5 as the \exact" solution at t ¼ 10. The L1�norm of the error is

shown in Table 1. It is clearly observed that the semi-implicit scheme (11) gives ¯rst-

order accuracy in time.

4.2. In°uence of the Huggins parameter

According to the above analysis and Fig. 6, the reticular potentials have di®erent

height of the well for the di®erent �. We know that the two distinct minima of V1ð�Þ

Fig. 6. The evolution of potential V1ð�Þ with �.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-12

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

correspond to the two equilibrium states, where a phase transition is possible. So here

we choose � ¼ 2:0, 2:37 and 2:8, �0 ¼ 0:6. We present three pictures to show the time

evolution of the system in t ¼ 5; 100; 200 for each �. The red area, corresponding to

the larger value of �, means there are enough chains in the system in Figs. 7–9. Here

we can see the phase transition process. Moreover, we also show that the total energy

is decreasing for each case from each sub-¯gure (d) in Figs. 7–9.

Table 1. t ¼ 10, L1-error with di®erent time step.

4t 0:001 0:0005 0:00025 0:000125 0:0000625

jjeð4tÞjj1 0:0256 0:0124 0:0060 0:0029 0.0013jjeð4tÞjj1jjeð42tÞjj1

� 2:0645 2:0666 2:0689 2:2307

(a) t ¼ 5 (b) t ¼ 100

(c) t ¼ 200 (d) energy

Fig. 7. Evolution for the case � ¼ 2:0.

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-13

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

(a) t ¼ 5 (b) t ¼ 100

(c) t ¼ 200 (d) energy

Fig. 8. Evolution for the case � ¼ 2:37.

(a) t ¼ 5 (b) t ¼ 100

Fig. 9. Evolution for the case � ¼ 2:8.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-14

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

4.3. In°uence of initial segment average concentration Á0

We ¯x the Huggins parameter � ¼ 2:37, in which the initial average concentration �0

ranges from 0:3 to 0:6. As shown in Fig. 10, for each �0, the evolution of the discrete

total massPL�1

i;j¼0 �ijh2 with time lies on a horizontal line, which implies that the

semi-implicit scheme (11) keeps mass conservation. In°uence of the initial average

segment concentration �0 is shown in Fig. 11.

4.4. Domain growth rate

The characteristic domain growth results for di®erent average initial conditions are

shown in Tables 2 and 3. We see that the growth exponent is close to 1=3. In Figs. 12

and 13, we plot the time evolution of domain growth RðtÞ, which also illustrates that

(c) t ¼ 200 (d) energy

Fig. 9. (Continued)

Fig. 10. The evolution of mass with time.

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-15

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

Table 2. Domain growth rate � with 128� 128.

Run � �0 L �

a 2:37 0:3 128� 128 0.331b 2:37 0:4 128� 128 0.317

c 2:37 0:5 128� 128 0.359

d 2:37 0:6 128� 128 0.310

Table 3. Domain growth rate � with 256� 256.

Run � �0 L �

e 2:0 0:4 256� 256 0.356

f 2:37 0:4 256� 256 0.358

g 2:37 0:6 256� 256 0.311

h 2:8 0:4 256� 256 0.362i 2:8 0:6 256� 256 0.325

(a) �0 ¼ 0:3 (b) �0 ¼ 0:4

(c) �0 ¼ 0:5 (d) �0 ¼ 0:6

Fig. 11. Initial average segment concentration �0 ¼ 0:3, 0:4, 0:5, 0:6 separately.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-16

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

the growth exponent is close to 1=3. Thus the numerical results are matched to the

modi¯ed Lifshitz–Slyozov theory.24

5. Conclusion

The MMC hydrogel is a kind of polymeric material, which possesses well-de¯ned

network structure and high mechanical strength. So it will have good applications in

new materials designing. Here we hope to provide theoretical studies for optimizing

the synthesis. We introduce Flory-Huggins-de Gennes-like reticular free energy

density for this well-de¯ned network structure MMC hydrogel. Then it can be

obtained the mesoscopic simulation equation, the MMC-TDGL model, which is a

microscale method to simulate the structural evolution of phase-separation in the

MMC hydrogel. This model possesses the physical properties: conversion of mass and

descent of the total energy. This make us design a numerical scheme keeping these

Fig. 12. Domain growth rate � with 128� 128. Up: time evolution of domain growth RðtÞ; Down: time

evolution of domain growth lnRðtÞ.

Fig. 13. Domain growth rate � with 256� 256. Up: time evolution of domain growth RðtÞ; Down: time

evolution of domain growth lnRðtÞ.

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-17

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

two properties. Now we do it. Thus we hope a reasonable physical representation can

be obtained. Based on the structural evolution of phase-separation, we analyze the

correlation function, which can label the growth of the average domain size. Nu-

merical results show that the growth law based on the MMC-TDGL equation is

consistent with the modi¯ed Lifshitz–Slyozov theory. This implies that the MMC

hydrogel also grows by the rate t1=3.

Acknowledgment

H. Zhang is partially supported by NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme

No. 11261160486, NSFC grant No. 11471046, 11571045 and the Ministry of Edu-

cation Program for New Century Excellent Talents Project NCET-12-0053.

References

1. Huang T, Xu H, Jiao K, Zhu L, Brown H, Wang H, A novel hydrogel with highmechanical strength: A macromolecular microsphere composite hydrogel, Adv Mater19:1622, 2007.

2. Wang X, Wang H, Advanced in the fabrication of hydrogels with well-de¯ned structureand high mechanical strength, Polym Bull 3:1, 2008.

3. He C, Jiao K, Zhang X, Xiang M, Li ZY, Wang H, Nanoparticles, microgels and bulkhydrogels with very high mechanical strength starting from micelles, Soft Matter 7:2943,2011.

4. Li X, Ji G, Zhang H, Phase transitions of macromolecular microsphere compositehydrogels based on the stochastic cahn-hilliared equation, J Comput Phys 283:81, 2015.

5. Zhai D, Zhang H, Investigation on the application of the TDGL equation in macromo-lecular microsphere composite hydrogel, Soft Matter 9:820–825, 2013.

6. Yao X, Zhang H, Kinetic model for the large deformation of cylindrical gels, J TheorComput Chem 13:1450032, 2014.

7. de Gennes P, Dynamics of °uctuations and spinodal decomposition in polymer blends,J Chem Phys 72:4756, 1980.

8. He M, Zhang H, Chen W, Dong X, Polymer Physics, Fudan University Press, 2012.9. Rubinstein M, Colby R, Polymer Physics, Oxford University Press, 2003.10. Peng Q, Zhang Z, Zhang H, The phase transition model for heat-shrinkable thermo-

sensitive hydrogels based on interaction energy applied mathematical modelling, BullMath Biol 17:594, 2015.

11. Wei G, Di®erential geometry based multiscale models, Commun Comput Phys 72:1562,2010.

12. Yuan C, Zhang H, Self-consistent mean ¯eld model of hydrogel and its numerical simu-lation, J Theor Comput Chem 12, 2013, doi: 10.1142/S021963361350048-X.

13. Li H, Smart Hydrogel Modeling, Springer Verlag, 2009.14. Goldbart P, Castillo H, Zippelius A, Randomly crosslinked macromolecular systems:

Vulcanisation transition to and properties of the amorphous solid state, Adv Phys 45:393,1996.

15. Cai S, Suo Z, Mechanics and chemical thermodynamics of phase transition in tempera-ture-sensitive hydrogels, J Mech Phys Solids 49:2259, 2011.

16. Hong W, Zhao X, Suo Z, Drying-induced bifurcation in a hydrogel-actuated nanos-tructures, J Appl Phys 104:084905, 2008.

D. Wu & H. Zhang

1650064-18

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.

17. Hong W, Liu Z, Suo Z, Inhomogeneous swelling of a gel in equilibrium with a solvent andmechanical load, Int J Solid Struct 46:3282, 2009.

18. Zhang J, Zhao X, Suo Z, Jiang H, A ¯nite element method for transient analysis ofconcurrent large deformation and mass transport in gels, J Appl Phys 105:093522, 2009.

19. Zhu J, Chen L, Shen J, Tikare V, Coarsening kinetics from a varoable-mobility cahn-hilliard equation: Application of a semi-implicit fourier spectral method, Phys Rev E60:3564–3572, 1999.

20. Vorselaars B, Kim J, Chantawansri T, Fredrickson G, Matsen M, Self-consistent ¯eldtheory for diblock copolymers grafted to a sphere, Soft Matter 7:5128, 2011.

21. Chakrabarti A, Toral R, Gunton JD, Muthukumar M, Dynamics of phase separation in abinary polymer blend of critical composition, J Chem Phys 92:6899, 1990.

22. Chakrabari A, Toral R, Gunton J, Late-stage coarsening for o®-critical quenches: Scalingfunctions and the growth law, Phys Rev E 47:3025–3037, 1993.

23. Goldenfeld N, Lectures on phase transition and the renormalization group, Front Phys85, 1992.

24. Rogers T, Elder K, Desai C, Numerical study of the late stages of spinodal decomposition,Phys Rev B 37:9638, 1988.

25. Huang JY, Numerical study of the growth kinetics for TDGL equations, M.S. Thesis, TheUniversity of Western Ontario, 1998.

Numerical investigation of the growth kinetics

1650064-19

J. T

heor

. Com

put.

Che

m. D

ownl

oade

d fr

om w

ww

.wor

ldsc

ient

ific

.com

by W

SPC

on

11/0

7/16

. For

per

sona

l use

onl

y.


Recommended