Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | beatrice-oneal |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 2 times |
NW Area Committee Meeting Region 10 Regional Response Team
October 7th, 2014Jami Goldman and Joseph Rinella
Monitoring Oil Spills
So why is USGS interested in Oil Spills?
Work coincides closely with our Mission Areas
• Assessing Hazards to Ecosystems and Reducing Losses
• Identifying Environmental Risk to Public Health• Assessing the Quantity and Quality of Water for
meeting future needs• Understanding Ecosystems and Predicting
Ecosystem Change
Columbia River Oil Monitoring1. Need early detection of a spill event
2. Need to quickly respond to leaks and spill events (including nights, weekends, and holidays—i.e. 24/7)
3. Need a mobile sensor to track a spill event -- Determine direction and time of travel
-- Monitor in sensitive areas -- Identify and predict the duration of time of the post spill events
Stream Velocity in Columbia River at Beaver Army Terminal, WY 2013
Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Str
eam
Vel
oci
ty (
feet
/sec
)
Tue Sep 30 07:18:28 2014
Estimate of oil plume 4 hours after spill at Beaver Army Terminal (RM 54)
Beaver Army Terminal Spill Location RM 54
5-6 miles upstreamafter 4 hours at -2 ft/sec RM 60
12 miles down-stream after 4 hours at 4-5 ft/sec RM 42
Down-stream
Columbia River
Columbia Reach Impacted by Spill
Beaver Army Terminal
PLUME
PLUME
USGS Continuous WQ Monitors• USGS operates continuous WQ monitors
across the countryhttp://waterwatch.usgs.gov/wqwatch/
• USGS operates over 200 sites in Oregon (streamflow, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, turbidity, TDG, chlorophyll, blue-green algae, FDOM, and/or nitrate)
• Follow strict USGS protocols
• Provides continuous data for real-time management of water resources by our cooperating agencies.
Columbia River at Bonneville Dam, photo U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Water Temperature
About 110Continuous
Temperature Monitors
Use of Continuous Oil Monitor Data• Early detection system
– WaterAlert
• Triggering emergency response and sample collection
• Estimating concentrations of unmeasured constituents
• Providing data for modeling plume movement
• Assessing water quality• Detecting temporal variations• Increasing process-based
knowledge of rivers
Kalamazoo River Oil Spill, 2010, USGS photos
Oil Monitoring• Many hydrocarbon sensors are
available (Wetlabs, ECO, AquaTracka, Turner Designs)
• Dynamic range of detection limits, and wavelength configurations
• Low detection limits ~300ppb • Sensor responses are linear over
a range of concentrations• Sensors work well for tracking
floating oil in the water column, (best for light crude oils—e.g. Bakken oil)
Deepwater Horizon, USGS
Path Forward• Assess needs and funding for Columbia River -- Types of oils transported in the Region • Propose continued investigations
– Confounding effects with interferences– Understanding behavior and fate of oil– Investigate coal contaminant tracking
• Sensor data may be used for model development (for example, time of travel tracer studies for tracking plumes)
• Complimentary/supplementary sensors– Particle size tracking– Hydroacoustics– Turbidity Columbia River, USGS photo
Jami Goldman, BiologistNorthwest Carbon Center, Project
Coordinatorhttp://or.water.usgs.gov/proj/carbon
References
Wagner, R., et al., Guidelines and Standard Procedures for Continuous Water-Quality Monitors: Station Operation, Record Computation, and Data Reporting, 2006. pubs.usgs.gov/tm2006/tm1D3/.
Conmy, R. et al., Submersible Optical Sensors Exposed to Chemically Dispersed Crude Oil: Wave Tank Simulations for Improved Oil Spill Monitoring, 2014. ES&T, 48 (3), 1803-1810.
USGS Contacts
James Crammond, Center Director503-251-3204
Joe Rinella, Supervisory Hydrologist503-251-3278
Stewart Rounds, Hydrologist/Water Quality Modeler 503-251-3280Chauncey Anderson, Water Quality Specialist
503-251-3206
SMART plan• Tier I: A trained observer, flying over the oil slick and using photographic job aids or advanced
remote sensing instruments, assesses dispersant efficacy and reports back to the Unified Command.• Tier II: Tier II provides real-time data from the treated slick. A sampling team on a boat uses a
monitoring instrument to continuously monitor for dispersed oil 1 meter under the dispersant-treated slick. The team records and conveys the data to the Scientific Support Team, which forwards it, with recommendations, to the Unified Command. Water samples are also taken for later analysis at a laboratory.
• Tier III: By expanding the monitoring efforts in several ways, Tier III provides information on where the dispersed oil goes and what happens to it.
• Two instruments are used on the same vessel to monitor at two water depths.• Monitoring is conducted in the center of the treated slick at several water depths, from 1 to 10
meters.• A portable water laboratory provides data on water temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen,
and turbidity.• In Situ Burning• For in situ burning operations, SMART recommends deploying one or more monitoring teams
downwind of the burn, at sensitive locations such as population centers. The teams begin sampling before the burn begins to collect background data. After the burn starts, the teams continue sampling for particulate concentration trends, recording them both manually at fixed intervals and automatically in the data logger, and reporting to the Monitoring Group Supervisor if the level of concern is exceeded. The Scientific Support Team forwards the data, with recommendations, to the Unified Command.