+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NZ911 Truth -Book

NZ911 Truth -Book

Date post: 08-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: james-samuel
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 88

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    1/88

    9/11See the evidence

    Learn the actsSeek the truth

    www.nz911truth.org

    http://www.nz911truth.org/http://www.nz911truth.org/
  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    2/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    3/88

    We all know the ocial story o 9/11...

    Four jetliners were hijacked by groups o Arabic

    men armed with box cutters, who proceeded

    to y three o the our jets into the World Trade

    Center Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the

    Twin Towers, weakened by the impacts and res,collapsed into piles o rubble.

    The FBI had compiled a list o hijackers within three

    days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden

    had masterminded the operation rom caves in

    Aghanistan, that there was no need to seriouslyinvestigate the crime or produce evidence.

    The retaliatory attack on the Taliban would

    soon commence and the ongoing War on Terror

    continues to this day.

    Is this story true?There are numerous red ags in the ocial story

    that have a long series o highly improbable

    coincidences. Questioning that story is an act o

    responsible citizenship.

    Introduction

    The images in this document are all freely available on the internet

    and have been used for public education purposes.This document is

    not for sale. NZ911Truth is a not-for-profit organisation.

    3

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    4/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    5/88

    World Trade Center 1 (WTC 1), or the North Tower, was the rst o the TwinTowers to be hit by a plane on September 11th, and the last to be destroyed.

    Jet Impact

    At 8:46 AM, a jet, apparently AA Flight 11, slammed into the northeast ace o

    the Tower, creating an impact hole that extended rom the 92nd to 98th oors.

    Upon impact, reballs and smoke emerged rom the building.

    FiresFor a ew minutes ater the impact, res could be seen on several oors.

    By the time the South Tower was hit, less re was visible rom the buildings

    north side, and the smoke had turned darker, apparently due to the

    exhaustion o the jet uel.

    Smoke is a sign o an oxygen starved re, meaning all the available uel

    sources have been burnt and the re is going out.

    Evacuation and RescueNo one on the 91st oor or above is believed to have survived. The New York

    Times estimated that 1,344 o the people in this zone perished.

    The light northerly wind kept the north corner o the roo clear o smoke, and

    helicopter rescues should have been possible. However, the Port Authority had

    all the doors to the roo o the Tower locked shut, despite the act that helicopters

    rescued 28 people rom the Towers roo during the 1993 bombing.

    Destruction

    The collapse happened at 10:28 AM. It began in an instant. Within about

    two seconds, the exploding clouds o dust swallowed up the Towers top.

    Although no ames had been visible in the crash zone or some time,

    a second ater the collapse began, large orange ames bellowed out rom

    the collapse zone.

    WTC 1

    5

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    6/88

    Most o the jet uel was burnt up in the initial

    reball essentially outside the building!

    Soon ater, the res were almost all out

    leaving just black smoke.

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    7/88

    WTC 2

    World Trade Center 2 (WTC 2), or the South Tower, was the second o theTwin Towers hit by a plane on September 11th, and the rst to be destroyed.

    Jet Impact

    At 9:03 AM, a jet, apparently United Airlines Flight 175, slammed into the

    southwest ace o the Tower, creating an impact hole that extended rom the

    78th to 84th oors. Upon impact, large reballs emerged rom the southwest,

    southeast, and northeast aces, and east corner. Oddly, the reball that emerged

    rom this Tower was several times larger than that o the rst impact, yet bothplanes were equally uelled.

    Fires

    Unlike the North Tower, in which some res were visible well above the impact

    zone, the res in the South Tower never spread beyond the impact zone.

    By the time the building collapsed, the res appeared to be sufocating, as no

    ames were visible, and only black smoke was emerging.

    Evacuation and Rescue

    Since the elevators were still working ully between 8:46 and 9:03AM,

    evacuation proceeded more eciently than in the North Tower. However,

    there was conusion caused by announcements over the PA system

    saying that the building was secure and people could return to their oces.

    Heeding that advice might have cost the lives o hundreds o people.

    When the jet hit the South Tower, it cut of several possible evacuation routes

    rom the 30 oors above the impact zone. It did leave at least one o thestairwells passable, and the New York Times reported that at least 18 people

    escaped through this stairwell. Most people above the crash zone were not

    aware o this escape route, and at least 200 climbed toward the roo in hopes

    o being rescued there, only to nd the doors to the roo locked.

    Destruction

    The South Tower began its precipitous collapse at 9:59 AM. In the same ashion

    as WTC 1, the Tower exploded in huge, quickly orming dust clouds. Both Towerscame to the ground in less than 15 seconds, or near the speed o gravity.

    7

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    8/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    9/88

    The WTC buildings were designedwith aircrat impact crashes in mind

    (planes lost in the og or example).

    They were designed to withstand an

    impact o the largest jet o its time(a 707) ully loaded and ully uelled.

    The planes that hit the Towers were not

    ully loaded nor ully uelled and the

    impacts were no more o a blow to theoverall structure than a continuous

    battering o hurricane winds.

    I believe the WTC buildings couldwithstand multiple impacts o jet airliners

    because the structure o the buildings

    is like the netting on a screen door.

    This intense grid. Puncturing the screen

    netting with a pencil has no eect to the

    overall structure.Frank DeMartini Architect

    9

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    10/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    11/88

    Any boy scout will tell you black

    smoke is a sign o an oxygen-starved

    re, meaning all the available uelsources (desks, chairs, cabinets,

    drapes, etc) have been burnt leaving

    a smouldering burn.

    I can see two isolated

    pockets o re we should

    be able to knock this outwith two lines.

    Message received rom

    reghter on walkie talkie

    Fires

    11

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    12/88

    We were told the ires were so hot theymelted the structural steel columns and

    beams causing the ailure and collapse

    o the Towers.

    What we saw was lames coming outo a ew oors or less than 20 minutes

    ollowed by 90 minutes o smoke.

    I the steel was so hot, then why is this

    trapped woman able to hold onto acolumn with her bare hands right at

    the crash zone?

    The thick black toxic smoke

    was unbreathable, orcing

    people to smash windows to

    get oxygen, and many to jump

    to their deaths.

    12

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    13/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    14/88

    The National Institute or Standards

    and Technology (NIST), in charge o

    examining the possible cause o thecollapse o the WTC Towers, explained

    this glowing yellow substance as:

    most probably molten aluminium

    rom the aircrat.

    But molten aluminium looks like

    molten aluminum its silver in colour,

    not glowing bright yellow.

    Diicult questions or NIST

    14

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    15/88

    This is molteniron lowing

    rom a window

    moments beore

    the Towers

    collapse

    This is moltenaluminium

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    16/88

    We saw molten steel runningdown the channel ways

    like lava rom a volcano.

    Note: The WTC res are some 1550 F

    (860 C) lower than the temperature

    required to melt steel, yet molten steelwas observed at Ground Zero.

    Temperatures o the WTC ires could

    not melt steel.

    What could cause molten steel at the

    base o Ground Zero?

    New York reghters

    (Pictured right)

    Can ire melt steel?

    16

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    17/88

    Melting points of metals

    and colour of flames

    F C

    Lead (Pb) Melts 621 327

    Faint Red 930 500

    Blood Red 1075 580

    WTC fires 1200 650

    Aluminum Melts 1221 660

    Medium Cherry 1275 690

    Cherry 1375 745

    Bright Cherry 1450 790

    Salmon 1550 845

    Dark Orange 1630 890

    Orange 1725 840

    Lemon 1830 1000

    Light Yellow 1975 1080

    White 2200 1205

    Structural steel melts 2750 1510

    Iron Melts 2800 1538

    Thermite (typical) 4500 2500

    A digger pulls up molten metal debris.

    Molten steel sitting like blobs o lava.

    NYC reghters tell o vast amounts omolten steel at Ground Zero.

    17

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    18/88

    Oice ires dont melt steel!

    A huge inerno in the Windsor Building,

    Madrid, burns or 24 hours but the steel

    rame structure does not collapse.

    The Hotel Mandarin, Beijing, was a

    huge inerno encompassing the

    entire building. Yet the steel rame

    structure does not collapse.

    NOT ONE steel rame building hasever collapsed due to ire.

    Examples o other building res

    Compare these examples to the res

    and 90 minutes o smoke rom the

    Twin Towers and the small res in WTC 7(see page 56).

    18

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    19/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    20/88

    You can see the top section o WTC 2 tilt as it

    alls. I this section continued to all over at

    this angle would you not expect it to all tothe ground in one intact block crashing in a

    pile at the base o the Tower?

    Instead it disintegrated into dust in mid-air

    beore it even reached the ground.What could cause this?

    The destruction

    20

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    21/88

    Huge steel beams rom

    the WTC Towers were

    severed at their connections

    and hurled at 50 mph intothe sides o neighboring

    buildings two ootball

    elds away.

    The energy required to

    propel these huge steel

    beams at a orce strong

    enough to wedge into

    buildings is ar greater than

    any pancake collapse.

    Extraordinaryorces

    21

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    22/88

    This is a volcanic

    eruption

    This is the WTCcollapse

    This is a nuclearexplosion

    This is the WTCcollapse

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    23/88

    Note the similarities between a nuclear

    explosion and the collapse o the WTC

    Towers. Huge upward and outwardarching streamers o pulverised material

    have the same appearance.

    A volcanic eruption orms the same

    pyroclastic cloud appearance as that

    o the collapsing WTC Towers.

    The mushroom-like canopy exhibited in

    both WTC Tower collapses have the

    geometry o explosion, notgravitational

    collapse.

    An incredible amount o energy is required

    to generate this ar greater than anything

    caused by burning jet uel.

    No pancake collapse here!

    23

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    24/88

    Question: Which block will hit the ground irst?

    80,000 tons o structural

    steel below the crash site

    Nothing but air resistance

    (Freeall)

    WTC 1

    ell in under

    15 seconds

    As did

    WTC 2!

    A B

    24

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    25/88

    Answer: B

    B should hit the ground rst because there is nothingbut air to slow it down. Unlike A which has 80,000 tons o

    structural steel below it to slow its momentum down.

    But both Twin Towers ell to the ground at near reeall

    speed. That means there was NO resistance in the lower

    oors as the top oors came down. 80,000 tons o

    structural steel would have to be instantly removed oor

    by oor all the way down in order or this to happen.

    A pancake collapse, as we were told, would not happen

    at the speed o gravity. In act, it would slow down and

    eventually stop. It certainly wouldnt all through the path

    o greatest resistance 80,000 tons o steel.

    Freeall physicsPut simply, reeall is the speed o gravity.

    I one was to stand on top o the WTC and

    drop a bowling ball, the buildings ell atnearly the same speed as the ball!

    25

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    26/88

    Denition: A squib is a miniature explosive

    device used in a wide range o industries,

    rom special efects to military applications.Squibs can be used or shattering or

    propelling a variety o materials.

    A squib generally consists o a small tube

    lled with an explosive substance, with a

    detonator running through the length o

    its core, similar to a stick o dynamite.

    Also similar to dynamite, the detonator

    can be a slow-burning use, or as is more

    common today, a wire connected to a

    remote electronic trigger.

    The efects o squibs are seen as violent

    ejections o pulverised concrete below the

    demolition wave clearly seen in both WTC 1

    and WTC 2 collapses.

    Squibs

    26

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    27/88

    1 2

    3 4Demolition wave

    Squibs start

    Note the squibs

    appear well belowthe demolition wave

    Demolition wave

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    28/88

    Pyroclastic surgeA pyroclastic surge is a uidised mass o

    pulverised material which is ejected during

    volcanic eruptions or nuclear explosions.

    Surges can travel great distances and are

    enormously destructive because o their

    massive kinetic energy.

    The intense heat and energy required to

    push all this pulverised building material

    at 80 km/h is equivalent to that o a

    volcanic eruption.

    Far greater heat would have been

    required than that o the WTC res

    (which were essentially out at the time

    o the buildings collapse).

    28

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    29/88

    Volcanic eruption

    WTC collapse

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    30/88

    In a controlled demolition belts o explosives

    go of in a timed sequence oor by oor to

    bring a building down. Signs o this are

    outward explosions in bands around thebuilding seconds beore the building collapse.

    Note the similarities in these two pictures.

    Controlled demolition

    What insurance company

    would insure buildings that

    do this as a result o re?

    And who would be prepared

    to work in a building that

    collapses when it is on re?

    Not one steel rame building

    has ever collapsed due to re,

    yet on 9/11 three buildings

    collapsed, including WTC 7,

    which was not hit by an

    aeroplane.

    Food or thought

    30

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    31/88

    Example

    WTC

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    32/88

    The above images show what buildings

    look like ater a structural ailure or

    natural disaster. Note they remain largely

    intact, and all over they dont allstraight down through the path o

    greatest resistance (in the WTCs case

    80,000 tons o structural steel) and the

    concrete is not pulverised to dust.

    32

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    33/88

    Now look at the WTC collapsing.

    Ask yoursel, does this look like a

    pancake collapse (due to re)?

    Or something much more powerul?

    33

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    34/88

    Note the molten drips

    o the cut edge

    When a building is brought

    down under controlled

    demolition, charges areplaced on each column on

    an angle to control the way

    the building alls.

    Note the angles o the cut steel on these

    core structure columns at the base o

    Ground Zero.

    Example

    34

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    35/88

    Less than 200 pieces o steel

    were kept, shown here in a

    secure hangar at JFK Airport

    More angled cuts on the

    ends o these columns

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    36/88

    Basement explosions!As reghters entered the rst Tower

    to be hit they described the lobby as:

    It was as though the plane hit the lobby!

    Basement explosions destroyed the

    parking garage and lobby. Marble

    panels weighing hundreds o kilos

    were blown of the walls. Smoke lledthe lower oors as people tried to

    get out. People in the basement levels

    were killed or severely injured.

    Marble panels gone!

    36

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    37/88

    Prior to the Towers collapse, huge basement

    explosions were taking place. One inch thick

    glass on the ground foor lobby was smashedand marble was shaken o the walls.

    White smoke appeared at the base o the

    Towers minutes beore their destruction.

    Note, only the windows on the ground foor

    are blown out.

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    38/88

    There are many witnesses o all three

    World Trade Centre collapses whospoke o hearing massive explosions

    going o, minutes beore, and

    during, the buildings destruction.

    Could these curved and distorted

    steel beams be the result o the orce

    rom planted explosives?

    SIMULATION

    These shear studs are rom a loor

    truss assembly. What orce would

    have evaporated the 5 to 6 inches o

    concrete that once surrounded them?

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    39/88

    A giant crater appears as basement explosions collapse the courtyard area.

    With any controlled demolition, the

    basement is always blown out rst to

    give the alling material somewhere to go.The debris rom the WTC Towers was

    only about 1 story deep at ground level

    the bulk o the material lled the

    basement levels.

    39

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    40/88

    William Rodriguez The last person to leave the WTC 1 alive

    I was in sub-basement B1 o the North Tower.

    Prior to any aeroplane impact I heard the sound o

    an explosion, the oor beneath my eet vibrated,

    the walls started cracking and everything started

    shaking. Seconds ater the massive explosion below

    in the basement, I hear another explosion rom way

    above, although I was unaware at the time, this was

    the airplane hitting the Tower, it occurred momentsater the rst explosion. Co-worker Felipe David

    stormed into the oce with severe burns on his ace

    and arms, yelling explosion! explosion! explosion!

    He was burned terribly. His injuries couldnt have come rom the airplane above,

    but only rom a massive explosion below.

    NOTE: Ater several years o touring around America giving his personal accounts

    o what happened in the WTC, William died o mysterious causes in 2008, just days

    beore the release o NISTs Final Report into the collapse o the WTC Towers.

    Anthony Saltalamacchia WTC survivor

    I was in my oce in sub-basement B1 o the North

    Tower, approximately 1,100 eet below the airplanes

    impact point at oors 93 to 98. I heard a massive

    explosion that I believed came rom the Mechanical

    Room in a lower sub-basement. Then I heard a serieso other explosions that sounded up on the above

    levels o the building. I then realised that there was

    something wrong and there was a major problem.

    About 15 people came running and screaming into

    our oce. One man was wounded, his arms bleeding

    and skin was peeling of down to the esh.

    The amount o explosions I heard rom 8:46 AM until the time we got out was so

    many, at least ten. It sounded like multiple explosions, like diferent grenades being

    set of in the building. There was one major explosion, and then diferent explosions

    throughout that period o time until we got out.

    There are plenty o witnesses that heard and survived

    explosions going o in the buildings and basements

    including WTC 7. Here are just a ew...

    40

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    41/88

    Phillip Morelli WTC survivor

    I was in the sub-basement o the North Tower,

    approximately 1,100 eet below the airplanes point o

    impact at oors 93 to 98. All o a sudden there was a

    huge explosion that threw me to the oor. All the ceiling

    tiles were alling down. The light xtures were alling,

    swinging out o the ceiling. And I come running out the

    door and everything, the walls were down. And I now

    started running towards the parking lots.

    Everybody was screaming ... There was a lot o

    smoke down there. I just know something else hit us

    to the oor. Right in the basement you elt it. The walls were caving in. Everything was

    going on. I know o people that got killed in the basement. I know o people

    that got broken legs in the basement. People that have had reconstructive surgery

    because the walls hit them in the ace.

    Mike Pecoraro WTC survivor

    Mike stopped to buy breakast on the way into WTC 1

    and changed into his work clothes.

    Deep below the Tower, Mike was suddenly interrupted...

    The whole building seemed to shake and there was a

    loud explosion and the room began to ll with smoke.

    Mike and a co-worker ascended the stairs to C level

    to a small machine shop where Vito Deleo and David

    Williams were supposed to be working. When the two

    arrived at C level, they ound the machine shop gone.

    There was nothing there but rubble, Mike said. Were talking about a 50 ton

    hydraulic press gone!

    The two made their way to the parking garage, but ound that it, too, was gone.

    There were no walls, there was rubble on the oor, and you cant see anythinghe said.

    Every sprinkler head was going of. It takes a lot o heat to set of a sprinkler head.

    41

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    42/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    43/88

    Thermite is a highly explosive substance

    used by the military. It burns at 2500 C

    and can melt through steel in seconds.

    Nano-Thermite

    DEFINITION: Super-thermites are generally developed or military

    use, propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics. Because o their

    highly increased reaction rate, nano-sized thermitic materials are

    being researched by the U.S. military with the aim o developing

    new types o bombs that are several times more powerul than

    conventional explosives. Nano-energetic materials can store higheramounts o energy than conventional energetic materials and can

    be used in innovative ways to tailor the release o this energy.

    Thermobaric weapons are considered to be a promising application

    o nano-energetic materials. Research into military applications o

    nano-sized materials began in the early 1990s.

    Physicist Seven Jones ound

    evidence o thermite in

    abundance in WTC dust samples

    collected rom several locations.

    NIST ailed to look or it,

    but we ound it, and it wasnot dicult to nd!

    43

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    44/88

    Molten sphere o iron

    Partially reacted

    thermite chips

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    45/88

    Evidence o Nano-Thermite

    Tiny chips o partially reacted, highly

    engineered Nano-Thermite was ound in

    abundance in WTC dust samples discoveredby Physicist Steven Jones (and subsequently

    more scientists ater his ndings).

    NIST, the Commission hired to investigate

    the collapse o the Towers, said they never

    looked or explosive incendiaries because,quote We didnt have to. It was the impact

    o the planes and res that caused the

    Towers collapse.

    How can you nd what you are notlooking or?

    Incidentally, Nano-Thermite does NOT

    come rom caves in Aghanistan!

    45

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    46/88

    Pulverised concrete and building

    materials rom the WTC Towers drited

    down as super ne dust, inches thick,blanketing New York City.

    People who inhaled this dust are today

    sufering rom lung problems and cancer.

    The rescue dogs only lived or a shorttime ater 9/11.

    Do you think a pancake collapse due to

    oce res (that were virtually out at the

    time o collapse) could cause this kindo damage?

    The dust

    46

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    47/88

    Millions o these red

    hot tiny spheres omolten iron and chips

    o active thermite

    drited down in the

    WTC dust clouds.

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    48/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    49/88

    Note the total dismemberment o

    steel columns and beams no sign o

    pancaked loors. All the concrete hasbeen pulverised to dust.

    Ground Zero

    This is what has become known as the meteorite. Its a solid block o

    melted and distorted metal and concrete. Architects and Engineershave said they have never seen this kind o deormation beore.

    49

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    50/88

    Fires continued to burn or around

    100 days ater 9/11. Fire crews

    continued to dowse hot spots withwater until it was like a lake.

    This is bedrock at Ground Zero

    which has been melted and then

    dried like a solid mud pool. Jet ueland oce res could not do this!

    Trucks transporting steel and rubble rom Ground Zero had to be dowsed with

    water to cool it down. Could burning jet uel cause this much heat or so long?

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    51/88

    Ground Zero inerno

    Thermite burns just as well under water

    because it creates its own oxygen source.

    This would explain why it took around100 days to put out all the res, even

    ater Ground Zero was swamped in water.

    Fire crews and USAR teams had to

    change their boots daily because therubber soles just melted!

    Here we see thermal imaging

    taken rom space by NASA o the

    WTC area on September 16, 2001.

    Orange/red areas are thermal hotspots in the hundreds o degrees.

    Note the same orange glow where

    WTC 7 was (marked A and B).

    No burning jet uel here!

    51

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    52/88

    The passport o

    Satah al Suqami

    who was alleged

    to be on Flight 11,

    was reportedly

    ound at the

    base o the WTC.

    Answer this. How

    is it possible that

    a paper passport,

    presumably in the

    jacket pocket o ahijacker, inside Flight

    11 was able to survive

    the impact and massive

    ireball that ollowed

    only to be ound

    virtually unscathed

    when were also told that

    everyone on that planewould have vaporised!?

    Non-convincing

    evidence

    Do you think this paper passport

    could make it through theexplosion and ireball and come

    out o it in perect condition?

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    53/88

    I this lie vest came rom under a seat on an actual passenger plane it

    should be compressed neatly and tightly, and even i burned, it should

    maintain that same overall compact shape and STILL be packaged.This rootop vest on the other hand, is NOT packaged and its open wide,

    showing very little burn residue.

    American Airlines lievest manuacturedin 1989.

    This is how a

    lie vest is

    neatly olded

    and placed

    inside a plastic

    bag and storedunder each seat.

    This American Airlines lie vest

    was ound on the roo o

    130 Liberty Plaza.

    53

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    54/88

    WTC 7was not hit byan aeroplane!...

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    55/88

    Building 7 (also known as WTC 7) was a

    47-story skyscraper that stood a block

    away rom the rest o the World TradeCenter complex.

    It was the 3rd building to all on 9/11!

    WTC 7 has been shrouded in secrecy.

    The 9/11 Commission reused

    to investigate the collapse o

    this building and did not

    mention it in their report.

    Only 5% o Americans knowit even ell as controlled

    media reused to mention

    it past the day o 9/11.

    WTC 7

    55

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    56/88

    Looking at this picture, would you say

    the building looks like it is in danger ototal collapse due to re?...

    WTC 7 sustained some damage to one corner o the building caused

    by alling debris rom WTC 1 and suspicious ires broke out in several

    locations in the building.

    56

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    57/88

    ...yet WTC 7 alls to the ground in under

    seven seconds (almost at the speed o

    gravity) at 5:20 PM on 9/11. Thats nearly

    7 hours ater the WTC 1 and 2 collapses.

    Note the classic demolition v-crimp on the rooline.

    It ell in true demolition style straight

    down into its ootprint. Flashes o light

    could be seen in windows and loud

    explosions were going of beore andduring its collapse.

    57

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    58/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    59/88

    In under seven seconds WTC 7 was

    transormed rom a 47 story skyscraper

    to a crumpled rubble pile.

    Remember, not one steel rame building

    has ever collapsed due to re, until 9/11!

    Kevin McPadden Witness to WTC 7 collapse

    Kevin McPadden, ormer Air Force Special Operations or

    Search and Rescue expert, traveled to Ground Zero and spent

    the next our days searching through the rubble and nearby

    buildings or survivors.

    McFadden was in the area o WTC 7 prior to its collapse trying

    to glean inormation rom Red Cross ocials, McPadden and

    other rst responders were told nothing while one ocial,

    shortly ater talking to remen, held his hand over his radioand told them to just sit tightand calm downbeore admitting theyre thinking

    about bringing the building down.

    He took his hand of or the last three seconds o it and you hear three, two, one,

    said McPadden, adding that the ocial then gave a heartelt look and told the rst

    responders, just run or your lie.

    McPadden got the impression that the Red Cross ocial had been ordered not to give

    the rst responders a warning that the building was coming down.

    And you heard boom, boom, boom,said McPadden, describing the sound o bombstearing down the building.

    He also highlighted the act that vicious security

    was quickly set up around certain areas o

    Ground Zero and that people were barred rom

    accessing certain areas or no reason and also

    had their cameras conscated.

    When McPadden attempted to report that

    secondary explosions were heard by numerouspeople, he was harshly ordered to shut upand

    dont repeat itby superiors.

    59

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    60/88

    This live BBC news broadcast explains that WTC 7

    has also collapsed BEFORE it has collapsed!

    Note WTC 7 in the background.

    Seconds ater she

    mentioned it, the picture

    turns pixillated and thenewsroom apologies

    or technical problems.

    A mistake o the

    newsroom, or prior

    knowledge o a mis-timed event?

    60

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    61/88

    Barry Jennings WTC 7 survivor

    I was stuck on the 8th oor o WTC 7

    or many hours, during which time Iheard numerous explosions below.

    Some o the blasts came beore the

    World Trade Centers collapsed, while

    others came ater the Towers had allen.

    I was eventually saved by 10 New York

    City reghters. We made it down to thelobby which was completely obliterated, with rubble and even

    dead bodies. One reghter kept saying, Dont look down.

    I kept saying, Why?. We were stepping over dead people!

    Barry was exited rom WTC 7 through a hole in the wall.

    A reghter then told him You have to run. I said, I cant,

    my knees are swollen. He said Youll have to get on your knees

    and crawl then, because we have reports o more explosions.

    NOTE: In 2008 Barry Jennings died mysteriously.

    His death occurred only days beore the release o NISTs

    Report on the Collapse o WTC Towers. Are we starting to see

    a pattern here? Reer William Rodriguez, page 40.

    An interview with Barry Jennings last man out alive o WTC 7

    61

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    62/88

    Were the tenants o WTC 7 the reason

    why the mainstream media never wanted

    the public to know about its collapse?

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    63/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    64/88

    What happened toall the steel?

    Immediately ater 9/11 the removal anddestruction o the steel commenced

    beore proper analysis o the steel could

    be undertaken.

    The steel was transported by convoys otrucks to steel works to be melted down.

    From thousands o tons o steel, less than

    200 pieces have been saved. These are held

    under tight security in a disused hangar at

    JFK airport.

    The USS New Yorkrigate and thousands

    o 9/11 remembrance badges were made

    rom WTC steel.

    64

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    65/88

    Trucks were tted with monitored

    GPS units to ensure the drivers

    did not stray or stop rom their

    destination. One driver who

    stopped on route or lunch was

    sacked.

    USS New Yorkmade rom

    WTC steel

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    66/88

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    67/88

    The Pentagon strikeThe Pentagon was struck at a portion o the buildings west

    block, which was undergoing an extensive renovation.

    Despite the interesting implications o this act, controversy has

    spawned by the lack o public evidence about the Pentagonattack, and mysteries surrounding the ate o Flight 77, the

    Boeing 757 thats supposed to have hit the Pentagon.

    Absent rom the public record are photographs or videos o

    anything like a 757 approaching the Pentagon. Photographs

    taken immediately ater the crash show that neither large

    pieces nor signicant quantities o wreckage remained outside

    the building. The idea that nearly all the remains o the 80-ton

    aircrat disappeared into the building strikes many people as

    problematic because the punctured walls o the initial damage

    to the building do not include regions where the ends o the

    wings and the vertical tail section would have impacted, nor do

    they show signs o scoring by these parts.

    To some observers, the lack o obvious crash debris outside thebuilding ollowing the attack, the lack o an impact impression

    closely matching the prole o a 757, and the suppression o

    videos and photographs that may have shown the approach o

    the attack plane and its remains inside the building were red

    ags indicating that the attack involved some entirely diferent

    type o aircrat, or no aircrat at all!

    67

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    68/88

    In separate interviews with

    George Bush and US Secretary oState Condoleezza Rice both said:

    No one in their wildest dreams would

    think anyone could hijack passenger

    aircrat and use them as missiles to attackkey buildings within the United States.

    But clearly this exercise conducted in the

    months prior to 9/11 does exactly that!

    A Pentagon drill simulatesterrorist scenarios

    68

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    69/88

    Police and re

    department personnel

    contemplate responses

    during the MASCALDrill 2426 Oct 2000.

    A plane crash is

    simulated inside

    the courtyard o a

    model Pentagon.

    This tabletop exercise

    was designed to help

    emergency relie

    personnel better

    prepare or disasters

    when they occur.

    69

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    70/88

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    According to reports, FBI

    agents conscated security

    ootage rom neighboring

    businesses that would have

    shown the impact at the

    Pentagon. No video has ever

    suraced or been released

    by the Feds showing a 757passenger jet crashing into

    the building.

    In March 2002, the govern-

    ment released these ve

    still-rames. Why would theybother releasing pictures

    that do not even show a jet?

    Keep in mind that every inch

    o the Pentagon, inside and

    out, is under constant videosurveillance.

    In March 2002, 5 rames

    rom a video surveillance

    camera were released.

    This is the only video

    evidence o the attack.

    70

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    71/88

    Frames 1 & 2 show a whitevapor trail. 757s DO NOT

    create white vapor trails

    at ground level!?

    Why is the timestamp on theimages incorrect?

    How many other Pentagon cameras

    captured the attack?

    There are numerous cameras that would have

    captured an aircrat approaching and crashing into

    the side o the building. The images captured rom

    these cameras have all been seized.

    White vapor trailRed lags

    71

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    72/88

    Close-up o the hole in the

    Pentagon acade beore the

    roo collapse. Note the intact

    windows above where the

    tail would have struck and to

    either side where the wings

    and engines would have

    struck. Notice the partially

    intact column in the middle.

    Would a 757 t into that hole?

    ?

    ? ?

    Where is the wing

    and tail in damage?

    Do you think the aircrat couldt through this hole without

    causing wing damage to either

    side o the collapsed section?

    Playing with shapes

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    73/88

    Interviews with experienced pilots havesaid the alleged aircrat manoeuvre

    ying at 500 mph just eet rom the

    ground then slamming into the side o

    the building with such precision would

    be near impossible, especially or

    amateur pilots (hijackers) who could

    not even land a Cessna. (See page 78)

    SIMULATION

    No camera saw this?

    A Boeing 757 is simply not designed to fy so ast so close to the ground

    it simply cant do it. This is because o the tremendous lit created under

    this large plane going so ast. Not to mention there is an eect called

    downwash, where the plane creates a huge suction under it as it fies.

    This would have picked up everything that was under a 757 and thrown

    it in all directions or instance cable spools, as seen in the pictures

    above and centre let, just in ront o the crash zone.

    This basically demolishes the ocial Pentagon story.

    Cable spools in ront

    o crash zone

    73

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    74/88

    Both o the WTC Towers

    suered damage rom the

    wings o the aircrat.

    Yet the Pentagon had no damage

    indicative o wings or a tail section

    prior to the roos collapse.

    SIMULATION

    ?Thisist

    oscaleofa757

    This is the exit hole in the courtyard o the

    Pentagon. Would a crashed 757 aircrat

    create such a neat exit hole?

    A titanium jet engine could cause this holeand still be relatively intact except no jet

    engine was ound in the courtyard!?

    Plus there was only one hole like this, not two.

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    75/88

    The portion o the Pentagon struck was

    sparsely occupied, nearing completion o

    renovation. Why would an Islamic terrorist

    perorm a dicult manoeuvre to strike

    the portion o the building that would

    cause the ewest atalities?

    Note the direction o thealleged approach path.

    Why would an amateur

    pilot pass up a more

    direct approach to hit the

    Pentagon, instead choosing

    a complicated circular

    manoeuvre to hit the only

    section o the buildingthat was under renovation

    and sparsely occupied?

    And all o this with very

    little approach distance

    and without touching the

    ground.

    More red lags

    Flight path taken according to the

    ocial story.

    75

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    76/88

    In any major crime scene, all evidence

    must be let alone until a properinvestigation is undertaken.

    Yet at the Pentagon, every ragment o

    debris is picked up and seized beore

    any proper analysis or investigationcould take place.

    Note, no aircrat black box was ound,

    but they did ind a plastic student ID

    card rom one o the alleged hijackersin near perect condition!

    Disturbing the crime scene andremoval o evidence

    76

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    77/88

    Above: Pentagon ocials and oce sta

    (still wearing shirts and ties) were told to

    pick up all debris on the lawn area in ront

    o the Pentagon.

    Right: A Student ID card o alleged hijacker

    Nawa Alhazmi, was ound in a recognisable

    condition amongst all the devastation.

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    78/88

    This guy could not solo a Cessna 150 ... and what I

    mean by solo is a pilots rst time out without anyone in

    the cockpit with him. Its the most simple, the most

    undamental fying exercise one can engage in...

    Hani Hanjour was one o the ve alleged hijackers

    and pilot o Flight 77 that struck the Pentagon withunbelievable precision.

    Federal Aviation Administration records show Hanjour

    obtained a commercial pilots license in April 1999, but

    how and where he did so remains a lingering question

    that FAA ocials reuse to discuss.

    Flight Academy staf members characterised Mr Hanjour

    as polite and very quiet. But most o all, the ormeremployee said, they considered him a very bad pilot. Im still to this day

    amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon,the ormer employee

    said. He could not fly at all.

    However, when Baxter and ellow instructor Ben Conner took the slender,

    sot-spoken Hanjour on three test runs during the second week o August,

    they ound he had trouble controlling and landing the single-engine

    Cessna. Even though Hanjour showed a ederal pilots license and a log

    book cataloging 600 hours o ying experience, chie ight instructorMarcel Bernard declined to rent him a plane without more lessons.

    In the spring o 2000, Hanjour had asked to enroll in the CRM Airline Training

    Center in Scottsdale, Arizona, or advanced training, said the centers attorney,

    Gerald Chilton. Hanjour had attended the school or three months in late

    1996 and again in December 1997 but never nished coursework or a license

    to y a single-engine aircrat, Chilton said.

    When Hanjour reapplied to the Center or a third time, We declined toprovide training to him because we didnt think he was a good enough

    student when he was there in 1996 and 1997Chilton said.

    A proile on Hani Hanjour

    Gerald Chilton Jr CRM Airline Training Center

    78

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    79/88

    Can you see a problem here?

    Cessna 172

    Boeing 757

    79

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    80/88

    Could a 757 passenger

    jet disappear into this

    tiny hole in the ground?

    Where are the wings,

    pieces o uselage, jet engines,

    or the tail section?

    Note the grass in the ore-ground is not even burnt

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    81/88

    United Airlines Flight 93 was the 4th

    alleged aircrat to be hijacked on 9/11.

    The ocial media story claims it washeading or the White House, but ater

    passengers struggled to overpower the

    hijackers the plane was own erratically

    ending in a vertical nose dive crashing inShanksville, Pennsylvania.

    Flight 93

    This is the only known photoo the impact explosion o the

    alleged Flight 93 crash.

    Compare this photo o an actual planecrash to the pu o smoke shown in the

    photo on the let.

    81

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    82/88

    This is what an actual plane crash site looks like. There are still large

    pieces o wreckage intact and there is no mistaking it is an aircrat.

    This is Flight 93s crash site in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

    You have to ask yoursel, does this look like the scene o a 757 jet crash?

    TYPICAL PLANE CRASH EXAMPLE

    ALLEGED FLIGHT 93

    CRASH SITE

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    83/88

    Jet-crash-proo bandana!

    The trial o Zacarias Moussaoui in 2006 resulted

    in the release o a large number o trial exhibits.

    One was an unblemished bandana, which was

    recovered rom Flight 93s crash site.

    The ocial media story claims Flight 93 nose dived and crashed into

    a crater 10 eet deep, leaving no recognisable debris beyond scraps o

    charred aluminum. Yet the bandana and passport miraculously survived

    the crash without so much as a blemish.

    SIMULATION

    Note, it is IMPOSSIBLE to take a 757

    passenger jet into a vertical nose dive.

    Another was the

    alleged hijacker Saeed

    Alghamdis passport

    in legible condition.

    This is all aircrat pieces that

    were recovered. Could a 757

    aircrat it into a skip bin?83

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    84/88

    Cell phone calls?

    Many cell phone calls were allegedly made rom passengers on

    Flight 93 to amily and loved ones. A Hollywood movie was even

    created based on the story o Flight 93 and the cell phone calls

    made. But the truth o these phone calls having even been madeis highly improbable.

    In December 2004 the U.S. Federal Communications Commission

    (FCC) held hearings to consider liting the ban on the use o cell

    phones in aircrat.

    The FCC banned in-ight use because cell phones can

    communicate with more than one cell tower when in the air.

    This could lead to disruption o service or cell phones on theground, which uses only one tower at a time.

    The Commission heard testimony rom industry experts that

    cell phone calls at higher altitudes, using current technology,

    was not possible.

    But the Commission heard evidence that new cell phone

    technology had advanced ar enough in recent years tominimize such disruption o ground service.

    Were cell phone calls rom the hijacked planes

    possible in 2001?

    The new Air New Zealand A320

    with cellular network capability

    came into service in February 2011.

    Prior to this latest technology it was

    not possible to make cell phonecalls at high altitudes such as the

    alleged calls rom Flight 93.

    84

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    85/88

    An experiment was conducted to see i cell phones can

    work in aeroplanes. The experimenters ound that the

    percent o success rate o contact was as ollows:

    Todays vote by the FCC Federal

    Communications Commission is

    intended to address whether

    technology has improved to theextent that cell phone calls now

    are possible above 10,000 eet

    they werent in the past and

    whether theyd mess up ground-

    based communications.

    Flight 93 was fying

    at 35,000 eet

    30% connected

    89% connected

    Thereore a cell phone

    connection would NOT

    have been possible.

    44% connected

    9% connected

    6,000 eet

    2,000 eet

    4,000 eet

    8,000 eet

    Only

    http://www.physics911.net/projectachilles

    San Francisco Chronicle,

    December 15, 2004

    85

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    86/88

    How much money was spenton investigating the collapse

    o the WTC Towers?

    Space Shuttle

    Discoverydisaster

    investigation

    $175 million

    Bill Clinton vs

    Monica Lewinsky

    stains on dress

    scandal

    $30 million

    $15 million

    NIST Final Report

    into the collapse o

    the WTC Towers

    The Government

    initially gave

    $3 million or the

    Commission to

    investigate thecollapse o the WTC

    Towers possibly the

    worst crime against

    America in history.

    Through public outrage,

    Congress subsequently

    provided an additional$12 million, bringing the

    total budget to a paltry

    $15 million.

    86

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    87/88

    Osama Bin Laden was NOT wanted by the FBI or the events o September

    11th, 2001. The reason, according to the FBIs Chie o Investigative PublicityRex Tomb, The FBI has NO hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

    SOURCE: FBI

    Most Americans believe that their government is not capable o attacking

    its own citizens. However, a declassied plan rom 1962, entitled Operation

    Northwoods consisted o: hijacking American airliners, attacking U.S.

    Military bases, blowing up U.S. Military ships, and shooting and terrorizing

    innocent Americans all to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext or U.S. invasion.

    This plan was rejected by John F. Kennedy.

    SOURCE: Department o Deense

    In the months beore 9/11 FBI headquarters consistently obstructed eld

    agent investigations o potential terrorists, blocking eforts to warn o

    impending attacks. Sibel Edmonds, a ormer FBI translator, was red or

    Whistle-Blowing and placed under strict gag orders under the little-used

    State Secrets Act. Her testimony regarding specic warnings about the

    attacks rom April 2001 was not included in the 9/11 Commission Report.SOURCE: 911truth.org

    A put option is a nancial bet that a stock will all and lose tremendous

    value. On the days just prior to 9/11, the put options placed on United

    Airlines were 285 times higher than average. On September 10th, 2001,

    put options placed on American Airlines were 60 times greater than

    average. United and American were the only two Airlines involved in 9/11.

    SOURCE: CBS, AP

    Two o the alleged 19 hijackers lived in the same house with an FBI agent

    in San Diego, CA. Also, according to Pentagon ocials, 5 o the alleged

    hijackers were trained at secure U.S. Military bases in Florida.

    SOURCE: CBS, MSNBC

    George W. Bushs cousin (Wert D. Walker, III) and brother (Marvin P. Bush)

    were acting Chairman and Director o Stratesec Inc., a multi-national

    security company, which was in charge o the World Trade Centre complex,

    United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. All three o these securelocations were breached on 9/11.

    SOURCE: SEC

    Final points

    87

  • 8/6/2019 NZ911 Truth -Book

    88/88

    This document has been produced by concerned New Zealanders who are

    only seeking the truth behind the events o 9/11.

    There are clear discrepancies in the ocial story o 9/11 that warrant a new

    and independent investigation.

    Every citizen in New Zealand and the rest o the world need to see the evidence,

    learn the acts and seek the trutho 9/11, and we must not sweep 9/11 underthe mat until a new investigation is undertaken. Then the world will know the

    truth behind this lie-changing event that spawned a war that will never end

    the War on Terror.

    What can I do to help?There are many things everyone o us can contribute to pushing or the truth.Here are just a ew ways you can make a diference:

    Take the time to educate yoursel, do your own research.

    The acts are surprisingly easy to nd!

    Write letters or emails and send to them media and government.

    Raise questions, seek answers.

    Go to www.AE911Truth.org , study the scientic acts, then sign the petitionon the home page (you dont have to be an architect to do this).

    Even better, donate to AE911Truth so they can continue to educate people

    with conerences, public displays, DVDs, printed material and TV spots.

    Check out New Zealands very own NZ 9/11 Truth movement by visiting

    www.nz911truth.org Contact us and get involved with our regular public

    awareness days to hand out DVDs and yers to educate people.

    To nd out more inormation on 9/11, see the scientic evidence,

    http://www.ae911truth.org/http://www.nz911truth.org/http://www.nz911truth.org/http://www.ae911truth.org/

Recommended