/O / 0 /?,6 la6/C- WBS: 9.3.7 QA: N/A Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating Contractor Monthly Summary Report August 1996 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management 1000 Independence Avenue SW. Washington, DC 20585 Prepared by: TRW Environmental Safety Systems Inc. 2650 Park Tower Drive Suite 800 Vienna, Virginia 22180 Under Contract Number DE-ACO1-91RW00134 6iO2iO135 961008 PDR WASTE WM-11 PDR 4 ?C Io/°7X DFO 1 h 9 6co y
35. Repository Analysis for Plutonium Disposition CFSR ............................ 38
WP235 v August 1996
INTENT1ONALLY LEFT BLANK
WP235 vi August 1996
1. PROGRAM-LEVEL REPORT
HIGHLIGHTS
RW-2 approved a revised Multi-Year Program Baseline on August 7, 1996. Level 2 multi-yearbaselines were delivered to RW-3, RW-10, RW-30, and RW-40 for review. Approval of these level2 baselines and their integration with the ongoing annual planning for FY 1997 is providing asignificant improvement in the overall planning process.
TOTAL CONTRACT PERFORMANCE DATA
* Figures 1 through 4 represent key financial information for the total contract. All FinancialStatus and Cumulative Financial Status figures include FY95 Carryover.
* The $6.145 overrun forecast at completion for the total contract is driven by the YuccaMountain Project and is discussed in section 2. An underrun is forecast for the rest of theM&O.
WP235 1 August 1996
;9
M&O TOTAL CONTRACT PROFILEFscal Yw 1996 I
35000
c 25000
Mc 20000I..
15000
10000 I I I I I I , i I I I I
ik Budget
--. _ tr Forecat
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR4NTH BD
MAY JUN' JL AUG SEP
.__ _ O oCT NOV DEC JAN I FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG ' SEP FY96+ AtComplete
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPMNTH BD
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPStaffing Plan 1831.5 1792.7 16972 1582.9 15782 1562.2 1506.1 1468.8 1461.6 1436.8 1354.9 1406.8Actial FTEs 1841.3 1966.5 1522.9 1519.3 19142 1624.0 1414.7 1682.8 1508.0 1516.6 1514.6Normalized 1526.9 1867.3 1578.1 1380.1 16685 1484.0 14712 1489.3 _
REMARKSCFSR Includes contract mods through month end August.
I1 Includes lease termination funding of $6813 and advance agreement of $9720r
-
'a0'
4
Figure 4. M&O Total Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR)
2. YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT REPORT
Significant progress was made during August in completing deliverables for the Yucca MountainProject. The list includes fourteen scientific program synthesis reports that were submitted to DOEfor review and acceptance. These reports, principally produced by scientists at the NationalLaboratories, summarize the collective information gathered over the years on key scientific aspectsof Yucca Mountain and represent a major step forward in our understanding of the site as a potentialrepository.
Progress was also made in developing the detailed work plans for FY 1997. We are on schedule tohave a baseline plan in place at the start of the fiscal year. We expect that having a plan toimplement at the start of the year will improve our performance in achieving the FY 1997 objectivesand a Viability Assessment in 1998.
The Tunnel Boring Machine made good progress, but was shut down at the end of the month toresolve health and safety non-compliance issues regarding policies and procedures for wearingrespirators and for reducing hazards in the tunnel. Although levels of crystobalite have beendeclining, they still exceed acceptable thresholds and the use of respirators for worker protection isstill required.
Management attention was also focused on refining the process for successfully producing aViability Assessment (VA) for the DOE in 1998. In that regard, the Deputy AGM (Technical) wasassigned the role of Viability Assessment Project Engineer. In addition to his other functions, hebegan coordinating with DOE, M&O, and National Laboratory managers responsible for producingproducts for the VA, and developed a preliminary set of technical milestones that would serve as ameasure of incremental progress.
Another significant milestone was achieved on schedule: the initiation of the first thermal test in theExploratory Studies Facility (ESF). The preparations for this test required an integrated effortinvolving construction, engineering, and scientific programs personnel from a number oforganizations within and outside the M&O.
HIGHLIGHTS
* Advanced tunnel excavation to Construction Station 63+47.1 meters (20,823.8 feet or 3.94miles). Progress for the month of August 1996 utilizing the Tunnel Boring Machine was 241.4meters (792.0 feet).
* Completed Northern Ghost Dance Fault Alcove excavation to Construction Station 0+89.6meters (293.9 feet). Progress for the month of August 1996 utilizing both the Alpine Miner anddrill/blast techniques was 37.4 meters (122.7 feet).
* Submitted the Performance Confirmation Concepts Study Report providing an overview of thetotal performance confirmation approach and provides recommendations to ensure needed dataacquisition requirements are included in the Mined Geologic Disposal System design.
WP235 5s August 1996
* Submitted the Engineered Barrier System Performance Requirements System Study Report,concluding that based on current safety standards, inclusion of backfill and related emplacementsystems would not be required in the repository design.
* Submitted the Thermal Loading Study recommending thermal requirements be used in therepository design and to support life cycle cost determinations.
* Submitted the South Portal Design System Safety Analysis, evaluating design features forpotential hazards and accident mitigation. In addition, issued the South Portal Design providingrequired direction for construction of the access road, pad, and portal for the south entrance tothe Exploratory Studies Facility.
* Submitted the Waste Package Materials Selection Analysis, providing a summary of materialselection, justification, and recommendations for designing the waste package.
* Submitted the Waste Package Fabrication Process Report, evaluating and recommendingvarious methods of manufacturing which confirms that a waste package can be fabricated tomeet current safety standards.
* Initiated heater phase of Single Heater Test on schedule. The outcome of this 18-month in-situthermal test is centrally important to understanding- thermal flow, effects in the repository, andthe design of the waste package.
* Submitted the Project Integrated Safety Assessment (PISA) Management Plan describing theassessment preparation process. The purpose of PISA is to present integrated information fromScientific Programs, Engineering Design, and Performance Assessment in a format adequatefor a Safety Analysis Report.
PERFORMANCE DATA
* Figures 5 through 8 represent key financial information for the Yucca Mountain Project.
* The forecast at complete includes costs for which funding has been provided, but CRs toincrease the budget have not yet been approved. A combination of implementing a correctiveaction plan and approval of the CRs should eliminate this negative cost variance at complete.
* The increase to the budget reflects approval of a CR to continue the PMO through the end ofthe fiscal year.
* The DOE authorized additional FY 96 workscope by a letter from the Yucca Mountain ProjectManager providing $15.6 million of funding via an AFP. Some of this work was initiated inAugust after COR direction was received.
WP235 6 August 1996
YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE-CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT (YMP)| R~~~~~~~~~~Fscal Year 1996
25000 -
I
15000
- -Budget+.. Actuas
0 Mgr Fbrecast
10000ocr NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
*MONTH E
-J
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96 + At CompleteBudget 15129 17570 15757 18099 27439 17713 16499 15467 14432 12589 12763 21267 0 204724Actuals 12960 18292 19794 17134 23142 1876 18 16312 18T1 14317 18285Mgr Forecast 12960 18292 19794 17134 23142 18273 19148 16312 12815 14317 18285 21264 1201 212937Cost Variance 2169 -722 -4037 965 4297 J 56 -2649 -845 1617 -1728 -5522 3 -1201 -8213
Figure 5. Yucca Mountain Project Financial Status (for M&O only)
YUCCA MOUNAIN SITE-CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT (YMP)YUCCA MOUNTAIN ~~~~~iscal Year 1gge
250000
200000 -
150000 _ .--. | CUm Budget
MO 10000§ ° tOOO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o _ _~~~~~~~- Cum Actuals
.g _oocco - CumlgrForecast
50000
0OCT NOV DEC JAN FEs MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96 +
MONTHEN~D
OCT NOV DEC I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN | JUL AUG SEP |FY96+ AtCompletsCum Budget 15129 32699 48458 66555 93994 111707 128206| 143673| 158105| 170694 183457 2047241 204724 204724CumActuals 12960 31252 51046 68180 91322 109595 128743 145055 157870 172187|190472Cum MgrForecast 12960 31252 51046 68180 91322 109595 128743 145055 157870 172187 190472 211736 212937 212937Cum Varlance 2169 1447 -2590 -1625 2672 2112 -537 -13821 2351 -14931 -7015 -70121 -82131 -8213
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 15. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 17. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) j9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACOI-91RW00134 INCREMENTALLYFUNDED I 31 JUIy96 ITESS:2650PARKTOWER DR I $15,800
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT(DOLLARS IN THO NDS) ____
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACO1-91RWO0134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 TESS: 2S50 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
__ I~~~~~~~~VIENNA. VA n21802. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION 6. CURRENT REPORT DATE 8. PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:COST PLUS AWARD FEE 31 August 96 $880,731
I OCRWM M&O I
11. ________ ________ ________ FUNDING INFORMATIONACCRUED CONTRA T WORK AUTHO)RIZED - FOREC I TOTA FUNDS NET
LINE ITEMIWBS APPROP. FUNDING XPE4IDITURES NOT NOT YET ALL OTHER SUBTOTAL REQUIRE- CARRY- FUNDSELEMENT LD. AUTHORIZED PLUS OPEN DEF1HmZED DEFINITIZED SUBTOTAL AUTHORIZED WORK MENTS OVER REQUIRED
TO DATE COMMrIENTS (WAD) (PROPOSED) WORK (TO FY")" _ b C d . I - a --i It
12. __ CONTRACT WORK AUTHORIZED (WITH FEE) - ACTUAL OR PROJECTEDACTUAL AT
TO DATE Sept-Beyond FY 96 COMPLETIONa OPEN COMMITMENTS $28,062 $1.201 $fS°b. ACCRUED EXPENDITURES $572903 $595.172 $598,453 $598,453c. TOTAL 25 + 12b) $596,373 _ $598,453 $598,45313. FORECAST OF BILLINGS $566,069 $22,269 $3,281 $014. ESTIMATED TERMINATION COSTS $51,394 $51,394REMARKS
Figure 8. Yucca Mountain Project CFSR
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
WP235 10 August 1996
3. WASTE ACCEPTANCE, STORAGE, AND TRANSPORTATION PROJECTREPORT
Design activities leading to a Topical Safety Analysis report (TSAR) for an Interim Storage Facilityare proceeding according to plan with satisfactory progress in all activities. An initial technicalinterchange held between DOE and NRC on August 20th provided a useful exchange of informationconcerning the Generic Site Design Criteria and the ISF Design Approach. As a result of thisexchange, a revision was made to the site tornado criterion which will have minimal impact on thedesign. Both NRC and DOE participants expressed satisfaction with the results of the exchange.
All deliverables required from Westinghouse to complete the requirements of the MPC Phase 1contract have now been received and accepted following review. Timely receipt of the requiredinvoice should allow final close-out of this fixed price activity.
A major challenge facing us is completing the formulation of selection criteria for the various phasesproposed for the Transportation and Storage Privatization Initiative for inclusion in a draft request-for-proposal currently scheduled for release in October 1996. In order for the content of this draftRFP to stimulate useful responses from the industry, a decision regarding assigned responsibilitiesis needed as soon as possible.
HIGHLIGHTS
ISFITSAR DESIGN PROJECT
E Conducted first ISF TSAR Project Technical Interchange with the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission on August 20th, 1996. The ISF Design Approach, Generic Site DesignCriteria, and TSAR Development were presented.
* Based on feedback from NRC and DOE, revised the Generic Site Design Criteria analysismodifying the site tornado criteria to a more conservative position. This is not an ISF-specific issue appropriate for the TSAR, and the economic impact on the ISF facility ofthe more conservative criteria is not significant for Phase I.
MPC CONTRACT
* All MPC Phase I contract deliverables (Safety Analysis Reports and Preliminary DesignReports) have been accepted by the M&O.
* The response for Deficiency Report VAMO-96-D-001 was submitted on August 23, 1996and accepted by M&O QA.
TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVE
* Issued the Technical Document Preparation Plan for the Transportation DesignRequirements Document (DRD).
WP235 All August 1996
* Completed and distributed deliverable on the Lessons Learned During the Fabrication andTesting of the GA-9 Legal Weight Tractor-Trailer System. The principal purpose of thisreport is to provide an account of the lessons learned during the fabrication and testing ofthe GA-9 legal weight tractor-trailer system.
* Responded to a request from RW-2 for an estimate of how much fuel could be shippedin 1998 with existing casks and with casks which might be built by 1998. Developedrough order of estimate of costs.
WASTE ACCEPTANCE
* Delivered the Final Validation Report on the 1995 RW-859 Database to RW-40.
OTHERDELIVERABLES
* Delivered summary of the July 16-18 Transportation External Coordination/Working Groupmeeting comments on the Section 180(c) Notice of Proposed Policy and Procedures. Thesecomments will be considered in the development of the Notice of Final Policy andprocedures to be published in 1997.
* The BCP for the WAST Multi-year Baseline was delivered to RW-40 on August 19, 1996and distributed to the POBCCB for review on August 21, 1996. A copy was also providedto RW-37 for information. The M&O prepared an integrated logic-driven schedule (ProjectSummary Schedule) to accompany the multi-year baseline.
* Transportation and Storage System Interface analysis was completed and approved by QA.
* Draft input to the RW-40 Annual Work Plan (AWP) was delivered on time, and theintegrated RW-40 plan was delivered nine working days later. Briefed the RW-40 staff onplanning assumptions and issues.
WP235 12 August 1996
PERFORMANCE DATA
* Figures 9 through 11 and 14 represent key financial information for the WAST Project. Part ofthe MPC contract was paid causing actuals to exceed the July report's forecast because the Julyreport forecast the entire payment to occur in September. We continue to forecast payment ofthe balance during September. The overruns in August and forecast for September are a resultof the MPC payment being budgeted for earlier in the fiscal year. Therefore, there is nocorresponding overrun forecast at completion.
* Figures 12, 13, and 15 represent key financial information for the Phase 2 MPC subcontract. Thedata is provided separately because it is funded by DOE EM.
Figure 12. Phase 2 MPC System S/C Management Financial Status (for M&O only)
PHASE 2 MPC SYSTEM S/C MANAGEMENTFiscalYear 1996
1200
1000
Boo 5i /JmBudget
§ 0 o _./ _ OjmActuals
a 400 - Cum Mgr Forecast
200 -
0 AtOCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96 +
MONTHBD
______________OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG' SEP FY96+ AtComPIotaCum Budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1003 1003Cum Actuals 0 0 0 0 0 - - ___ 0 _
Cum Mgr Forecast 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 997 997Cum Variance O 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 2 1 61 6
Figure 13. Phase 2 MPC System S/C Management Cumulative Financial Status (for M&O only)
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 13. CONTRACT FUNDING 15. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 17. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) |9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACOI.91RWO0134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED | 31 July 96 TESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACOI-1IRW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 TESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
|___________________ -_________________ V_____ IIEN NA.VA 221802. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION 6. CURRENT REPORT DATE 8. PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:
COST PLUS AWARD FEE 31 August 96 $880,731_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ ___OCRW M M &O
11. ________ ________ FUNDING INFORMATIONACCUED CONTRACT WORK AUTH IZED ORECAST _____ TOA FUNDS NET
LINE ITEM/WBS APPROP. FUNDING EXPENDITURES NOT NOT YET AU.OTHER SUBTOTAL REQUIRE- CARRY- FUNDS
ELEMENT I.D. AUTHORIZED PLUS OPEN DEFINITZED DEFINITIZED SUBTOTAL AUTHORIZED WORK MENTS OVER REQUIREDTO DATE COMMITMENTS (WAD) (PROPOSED) WORK (TO FY96)
* b e d j l < h l l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~k m
12. - CONTRACT WORK AUTHORIZED (WITH FEE) ACTUAL OR PROJECTEDACTUAL AT
TO DATE Sept _yond FY 9 COMPLETION
a. OPEN COMMITMENTS $3,246 S363 _ $0 $0b. ACCRUED EXPENDITURES $128,924 $132,664 $133,116 $133,116c. TOTAL (12a + 12b) $132,170 $133,027 .133f16 $133,116
13. FORECAST OF BILLINGS $128,925 $3,740 . $4521 $
14. ESTIMATED TERMINATION COSTS $2,827 S2 827 _ _
REMARKS
00'4
W.
G.0'.
Figure 14. WAST Project CFSR
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:E-ACOI11RW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 ITESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT____ ____ ___ _ __ ___ ____ ___(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING S. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACOI-91RW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 TESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ VI N N . A 2 60__ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ __ __ ___VIEN N A .V A 22180
2. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION 6. CURRENT REPORT DATE 8. PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:COST PLUS AWARD FEE 31 August 96 $880,731
12. . CONTRACT WORK AUTHORIZED (WITH FEE) ACTUAL OR PROJECTED
ACTUAL AT
TO DATE Sept Beyond FY 96 COMPLETION
a. OPEN COMMITMENTS $1,000 00 - _ _ $0 $0
b. ACCRUED EXPENDITURES . - S C _ . $1,000 $1,000c. TOTAL (12a + 12b) $1,000 $1,000 _ _ _ _ _ $1,000 $1,000
13. FORECAST OF BILUNGS $01 - $1 o$0
14. ESTIMATED TERMINATION COSTS $0 $1,000 I
REMARKS
Figure 15. Phase 2 MPC System S/C Management CFSR4
4. PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
HIGHLIGHTS
* The FY97 QA Annual Plan incorporating the Long Range Integrated Project Schedule andguidance from OCRWM QA is in final DOE review.
* Evaluation and discussion of the DOE QA proposal to consolidate all QA organizationalresponsibilities under OQA continues.
* New funding from management reserve is being released to the M&O. Additional M&Oworkscope (approximately $200K) is in support of design and construction activities.
PERFORMANCE DATA
* Figures 20 through 23 represent key financial information for Program Quality Assurance.
WP235 19 August 1996
PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCEFic9 Year 1996
1200
1100
g 1000
§ I 900o
I- 800
700
GoD I I I I I I I
-%-- Budget
--o.- Actuals
e Mgr Forecast
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN4ONTH BD
JUL AUG SEP
0
OCT NOV DEC JAN I FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCompleteBudget 976 850 681 11401 925 954 940 1003 956 960 992 939 0 11316Actuals 998 854 693 874 1005 1037 803 874 788 919 741Mgr Forecast 998 854 693 874 1005 1037 80 874 788 919 741 1096 0 10682Cost Variance -22 -4 -12 26 -80 -83 137 129 168 41 251 -157 034
Figure 16. Program Quality Assurance Financial Status (for M&O only)
0OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96 +
MCNtH BD
| OCT NOV I DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCoMpleeCumBudget 976 1826 2507 3647 4572 5526 6466 7469 8425 9385 10377 11316 11316 11316Cum Acrals ra 998 1852| 2545 3419 4424 5461 6264 7138 7926 8 9588 1 10Cum Mgr Forecast 998 1852 2545 3419 4424 5461 6264 7138 7926 8 9586 - 1 |Cum Variance -22 -26 -8 228 148 65 202 331 499 540 791 834 834* 634%0
(7
Figure 17. Program Quality Assurance Cumulative Financial Status (for M&O only)
PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCEFscal Year 1996 I
50
45
co 40
35
30
25 p p p p p p p p p p
-*K- StaffIng Plan
-e- Actual FTEs
-+- Actual FTM w/TRW Norrralzed
-eo- Ktr Forecast
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPKIONM eD
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPStaffing Plan 39.4 46.7 30.6 34.0 34.0 33.0 33.0 322 32.0 32.0 31.8 31.0Actual FTEs 39.4 46.7 342 31.7 36.8 32.3 31.7 32.7 37A 40.8 31.1Normalized 32.5 36.0 31.6 31.4 32.7 37.3 40.7 31.3Mgr Forecast 394 46.7 34.2 32.5 36.0 31.6 31.4 32.7 37.3 40.7 31.3 31.7Variance 0.0 0.0 -3.6 1.5 -2.0 1.A 1.6 -0.5 -5.3 -8.7 0.5 -0.7
Figure 18. Program Quality Assurance Staffing (for M&O only)
amO:
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT1rV I AC IA TU AII'}Aifl-
$.A
C
Ch
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 13. CONTRACT PRWGO lREPOW DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:OE-ACOI.91RWIS CEINTALIYA3V 31 kdy 96 l rESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
2. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION CURRENT REPOFIT DATE & PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:
COST PLUS AWARD FEE 31 Auud96 $880,731OCRWM M&O
11. _ _ _FUNDING INFORMATIO _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ACCRUED -CONTRACTWO_ FORCCAST _TA FUNDS NET
LINE ITEM/WBS APPROP. FUND*NG EXPENDITURES NOT NM (ET ALL OTHER SUBTOTAL REQUIRE- CARRY- FUNDSELEMENT LO. AUThORCED PLUS OPEN DEFDEIW DEFD41 SUMOTAL AUWHORED WORK MENTS OVER REQUIRED
TO DATE COMUTMENTS (WAO) (.OPOED) WORK (TO FY96)b d . k m
The Configuration Information System (CIS) continues to be tested in a "shadow operations" modewith the expectation that it will become fully implemented by the end of the fiscal year. A concerted,cooperative activity throughout the Program has lead to the successful implementation of thismanagement tool.
The pace of activities to implement the adoption of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel as an additional wasteform into the CRWMS has increased. A Data Needs Report was prepared and submitted in August,but much additional work needs to be planned and performed. It will be important to reachagreement on the proper management of the relationship with DOE-EM within OCRWM, even asorganizational changes are proposed and implemented, to ensure that Department needs are met.
HIGHLIGHTS
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION
* Delivered CRWMS Requirements Document (CRD Rev 3). The document has beenstreamlined for easy update, more effective use and improved traceability. This revisionalso incorporated DOE, SNF, and CRWMS operations functions into the technical baseline.
* Delivered Draft CRWMS Total System Description.
* Delivered RW-l's briefing book for his presentation to the NRC Commissioners.
DOE NUCLEAR MATERIALS
* Delivered Preliminary OCRWM Data Needs for DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel, Rev.0 one dayearly.
* The INEL task force activities have been kicked-off. Investigating funding from EM tosupport portions of this effort.
PLANNING
* Successful new documentation approaches were implemented in this year's annual planningprocess. The input to the RW-30 AWP was delivered. Briefed the RW-30 staff on planningassumptions and issues.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
* CIS is operational and accessible at all sites; all relevant data converted to the new systemand "shadow ops" is underway and doing well.
* Delivered preliminary Draft CRWMS Program Execution Plan to RW-30 on August 12,1996.
WP235 23 August 1996
PERFORMANCE DATA
& Figures 20 through 22 and 26 represent key financial information for Program Managementand Integration.
* Figures 23 through 25 and 27 represent key financial information for the Hanford TankWaste Remediation System (TWRS) EIS task. Separate charts are provided because thistoo is funded by EM.
WP235 24 August 1996
LA
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & INTEGRATIONPROGRAM Fiscal Year 1996
1200
1000
X 800
400
200
A Budget
+-* Actuals
+# M Frecast
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JL. AUG SEPONH OD
OCT jNOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN I JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCompleteBudget 1035 873 698 620 554 619 674 535 6301 496 533 475 0 7742Actuals 1029 842 820 401 632 411 282 525 414 531 659Mgr Forecast 1029 842 820 401 632 411 282 2 5 41 531 659 683 1 7331Cost Vaiance 6 31 -122j 219j -78 208 392 10 216 -35 -126 -20E -1021 411
Figure 20. Program Management and Integration Financial Status (for M&O only)
| PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & INTEGRATION || Fiscal Year 1996
10000
8000
6000 -cmBde
4000 - Cu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-OmActuals
N d000 -- OCmht Forecast
2000-
0OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96.
_ _ _ _ OCT 'NOV DEC | JAN | FEB MAR APR MAY | JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCompleeCum Budget 1035 1908 2606| 3226| 3780 4399 5073 5608 6238 6734 7267 7742 7742 7742Cum Actuals 1029 1871 2691 30921 3724 4135 4417 49421 5358 5887 6546
Figure 21. Program Management and Integration Cumulative Financial Status (for M&O only)
| PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & INTEGRATIONI FcalYear 1996 I
100
80
5 60
40
20
1, 1 S i" .~~~~~~~~~E
a a I
-K- Staffing Plan
-e- Actual FTEI
+ Actual FIB wlTFrN Norursfzed
e Mr Forecast
0'
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPONrH END
____________ OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPStaffing Plan 88.1 80.5 54.5 462 40A 39.1 38.8 38A 38.3 39.2 38.5 37.7Actual FTEs 88.0 79.7 612 432 40.6 33.0 352 37.1 39A 39.6 39.0
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 13. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-AC01-91RW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 Jul 96 TESS: 2680 PARK TOWER DR. 15800
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACOI.91RW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 TESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _ _ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ____ VIENNA VA 221802. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION 6. CURRENT REPORT DATE 8. PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:COST PLUS AWARD FEE 31 August 96 $880,731
.______________ , ______________________ OCRW M M&O .-
ACCRUEO CONTRACT WORK AUTHO ZED F___ _ fORECAST T TOTAL FUNDS TLINE ITEMWYBS APPROP. FUNDING EXPENDITURES NOT NOT YET ALL OTHER SUBTOTAL REQUIRE- CARRY. FUNDS
ELEMENT 1.0. AUTHORIZED PLUS OPEN DEFINITIZED DEFINITIZED SUBTOTAL AUTHORIZED WORK MEHTS OVER REQUIREDTO DATE COMMITMENTS (WAD) (PROPOSED) WORK (TO FYff)
12. ____ ____ CONTRACT WORK AUTHRIZD ITHFEE) - ACTUAL OR PROJECTED ________
ACTUAL AT
TO DATE Seet - -_ ond FY f6 COMPLEION
a. OPEN COMMITMENTS $601 $102 I _ sa $0b. ACCRUED EXPENDITURES _70.340 S71.063 - $71,249 $71,249
c. TOTAL (12 + 12b) $70.941 $71,1651 . $7,249 $71,24913. FORECAST OF BILLINGS $70,352 $723 - __$186 $014. ESTIMATED TERMINATION COSTS -1.628 $1,628 -REMARKS
Figure 26. Program Management and Integration CFSR
.3'0
%00%
U3
w
0
C
%oas
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORTInni a A IN rHOnusANlsiI--_ . ** -- _
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:
DE-ACOI-BIRWO0134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 TESS 2650 PARK TOWER DR. S15,800
V IEN NA . VA 221 60 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION 6. CURRENT REPORT DATE 8.PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:
COST PLUS AWARD FEE |31 August 96 . 880,731
L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~OCRWM M&O~~11. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~~~~~FU N DIN G IN FO RM ATIO N O R M M O_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ACCRUED CONTRA WOR AUTHO ____ FORECAST TOTAL FUNDS NET
LINE ITEM W#S APPROP. FUNDING EXPENDITURES NOT NOT YET ALL OTHER SUBTOTAL REQUIRE. CARRY- FUNDS
-ELEMENT I.D. AUTHORIZED PLUS OPEN DEFINITIZED DEFINITIZED SUBTOTAL AUTHORIZED WORK MENTS OVER REQUIRED
TO DATE COMMITMENTS (WAD) (PROPOSED) WORK (TO FY86)
b e d * t m . h, k _ _m
TWRS EIS EM $0 $52 $0 $48 $48 $0 $6 $6 $54 $54
TOTAL $0 $52 $0 $48 $48 $0 $6 $6 $54 $54
12. CONTRACT WORK AUTHORIZED IW11 FEE) - ACTUAL OR PROJECTED
ACTUAL AT
TO DATE Sepl -- Yond FY 96 COMPLETION
a. OPEN COMMITMENTS $0 $0 . $0 $0
b. ACCRUED EXPENDITURES $52 Ss3 -54 $54
c. TOTAL (12a + 12b) -2 $53 - -- 4 $54
13. FORECAST OF BILLINGS $52 $1 - $I__ $0
14. ESTIMATED TERMINATION COSTS $0 $0 -
REMARKS
Figure 27. TWRS-EIS CFSR
6. HUMAN RESOURCES AND ADMINISTRATION REPORT
Continuing support is provided to meet Program requirements in these areas. Planning for FY 1997activities has been undertaken with participation of all Program elements through off-site meetingssponsored by OCRWM. Agreements have been reached on priorities and tasks to be performed withthe resources available, and FY 1997 plans have been submitted.
The ability to continue providing necessary support in the information resource area (computer andnetwork communications) needs to be monitored closely. A highly competitive market in computerscience is causing personnel turnover, and our ability to continue providing skilled support personnelin required areas is impacted by our lack of depth in some key positions.
HIGHLIGHTS
* Camille Kerrgan and Thom Schwartz attended FY 97 annual planning off-site in Boulder, COwith DOE and Las Vegas counterparts. Determined scope of work for FY 1997.
* Completed joint (LV and Vienna) assessment of FY 97 records reprocessing costs. Option ofperforming all reprocessing in LV recommended to DOE.
* Submitted draft FY 97 annual plan to DOE for review.
* The Records Processing Center has successfully worked off the records backlog. Processingof records is now current with daily records received.
* Participated in video conference with M&O Information Management, Records Managementand QA representatives from VA and LV to discuss Electronic Signature usage on theAutomated Forms System. Defined an integrated M&O approach and a design standard thatwill be presented to DOE in September.
PERFORMANCE DATA
* Figures 28 through 31 represent key financial information for Human Resources andAdministration.
WP235 31 August 1996
1000
Boo
600
0 400
200
0
HUMAN RESOURCES & ADMINISTRATIONFscal You 1996
_ I p p I I I I
Budget
--s Actua
e-. W Frecast
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNIMBC
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCompleteBudget 591 474 272 384 386 341 299 320 394 342 322 365 0 4490
ACCRU.D CONTRA WORK AUTHOIZED FRECT_ _ T FUNDS NETLINE ITEMJWBS APPROP. FUNDING EXPENDITURES NOT NOT YET ALL OTHER SUB TOTAL REQUIRE- CARRY- FUNDS
ELEMENT I.D. AUTHORIZED PLUS OPEN DEFINTIZED DEFINITIZED SUBTOTAL AUTHORIZED WORK MENTS OVER REQUIREDTO DATE COMMITMENTS (WAD) (PROPOSED) WORK (TO FY96)
12. CONTRACT WORK AUTHORIZED (WI FEE) ACTUAL OR PROJECTEDACTUAL ATTO DATE Sept Beyond FY 96 COMPLETION
a. OPEN COMMITMENTS $186 S541 I $0 $0.b. ACCRUED EXPENDITURES $52,779 $53,137 | * $62,281 $62,281
c. TOTAL (12a + 12b) 2 $53,678 _ $62,281 $62,28113. FORECAST OF BILLINGS $52,779 M ai _ _ I $9,144 $014. ESTIMATED TERMINATION COSTS $8,327 $8,1611REMARKS
I i Includes lea" termination funding of $6813 and advance agreement of $972-
q0a%
v
Figure 31. Human Resources and Administration CFSR 4
7. REPOSITORY ANALYSIS FOR PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION REPORT
HIGHLIGHTS
* Submitted two deliverables, due this month, ahead of schedule to RWIYMSCO. One reportdealt with disposing MOX spent fuels into a repository, and the other evaluated the TotalSystem Performance of the plutonium waste forms in a repository.
* Submitted a cost plan for the $850K budgeted for FY 97 to RW/YMSCO.
PERFORMANCE DATA
* Figures 32 through 35 represent key financial information for Repository Analysis forPlutonium Disposition.
WP235 35 August 1996
REPOSITORY ANALYSIS FOR PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION REPOSITOY PscalYea 1996
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPMONTHEW
0%
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCompleteBudget 66 55 47 70 71 114 106 96 92 88 71 48 0 924Acuals 67 58 46 48 66 74 103 77 113 103 86 1MrForecasl 67 58 46 48 66 74 103 77 113 103 6 51 10 9aCost Variance *1 -1 1 22 5 "4 3 19 -21 -15 .15 -3 -10 24
Figure 32. Repository Analysis for Plutonium Disposition Financial Status (for M&O only)
| REPOSITORY ANALYSIS FOR PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION ||~~~~~~~~~~~~Fsa Yzou Ia99d
1000
800 _
6o00 ,ACmBdt
I CurnaAcu s400 l-ihroeat
200
0OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JLL AUG SEP FY98 +
MONH EW- . -
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP FY96+ AtCompleteCum Budget 66 121 168 238 309 423 529 625 717 805j 876 924 924 924Cum Actal - 67 123 169 217 283 3571 460 537 650 753 39Cum Mgr Forecast 67 123 169 217 283 357 460 537 650 753 839 890 900 900CumVanance -1 -2 -1 21 26 66 69 88 67 52 37 34 24 240l
It
Figure 33. Repository Analysis for Plutonium Disposition Cumulative Financial Status (for M&O only)
tA
REPOSITORY ANALYSIS FOR PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION IFiscal Year 1996
12
10
a
6
4
2
-)- StaffIng Plan
a Actual FTEs
-+- Actual FTE9 wTWN Nornlized
- Mgr Forecast
-4
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAYMONTH AD
JUN JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG -SEPStaffing Plan 4.8 4.6 4.0 6.6 7.0 9.9 8.8 8.6 9.1 8.7 6.9 5.3Actual FTEs 4.8 4.6 3.8 4.0 4.9 5.3 72 4.5 5A 7.6 5.4Normalized _ 4.3 4.3 52 6.6 42 5.3 6.6 6.0 _
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORTIn{Li I Afl2 IN THOUSANDSi
LA
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 13. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-AC01-91RW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96 TESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. S15,800
CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT___(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) _
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. CONTRACT FUNDING 5. PREVIOUS REPORT DATE 7. CONTRACTOR (NAME, ADDRESS) 9. INITIAL FY91 CONTRACT PRICE:DE-ACOI-91RW00134 INCREMENTALLY FUNDED 31 July 96- TESS: 2650 PARK TOWER DR. $15,800
. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~VIENNA. VA 22180_ _
2. CONTRACT TYPE 4. APPROPRIATION 6. CURRENT REPORT DATE 8 PROGRAM 10. ADJ. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE:
COST PLUS AWARD FEE . 31 August 96 $880,731OCRWM M&O
11. FUNDING INFORMATIONT IED ~FCONTRAOCrEWORAUIHCRIZED_ FoRECAST L FUNDS NET
LINE ITE&WBS APPROP. FUDING EXPEIOMTURES NOT NOT YET ALL OTHER SUBTOTAL REQUIRE. CARRY FUNDSELEMENT I.D. AUTHORIZED PLUS OPEN DEFINITIZED DEFINITIZED SUBTOTAL AUTHOWZEO WORK MENTS OVER REQUIRED
TO DATE COMMITMENTS (WAD) (PROPOSED) WORK (TO FY96)a b c d e 4h i i - k I m
