Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | erroy-van-radditszukage |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 29
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
1/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Human Resource
Policies andPractices
ChapterEIGHTEEN
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
2/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Selection Devices
Interviews
Are the most frequently used selection tool.
Carry a great deal of weight in the selection process.
Can be biased toward those who interview well. Should be structured to ensure against distortion due
to interviewers biases.
Are better for assessing applied mental skills,
conscientiousness, interpersonal skills, and person-organization fit of the applicant.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
3/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
The Selection Process
Initial Selection
Substantive Selection
Contingent Selection
Applicants who dont meetbasic requirements are
rejected.
Applicants who meet basicrequirements, but are less
qualified than others, are rejected.
Applicants who are among bestqualified, but who fail contingent
selection, are rejected.
Applicant receives job
offer.
E X H I B I T 181
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
4/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Selection Devices (contd)
Written Tests Renewed employer interest in testing applicants for:
Intelligence: trainable to do the job?
Aptitude: could do job?
Ability: can do th
e job? Interest (attitude): would/will do the job?
Integrity: trust to do the job?
Tests must show a valid connection to job-relatedperformance requirements.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
5/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Selection Devices (contd)
Performance-Simulation Tests Based on job-related performance
requirements.
Yield validities (correlation with jobperformance) superior to written aptitude
and personality tests.
Work Sample Tests
Creating a miniature replica of a job to evaluatethe performance abilities of job candidates.
Assessment Centers
A set of performance-simulation tests designedto evaluate a candidates managerial potential.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
6/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Training and Development Programs
Types ofTypes of
TrainingTraining
Basic LiteracyBasic Literacy
SkillsSkills
TechnicalTechnical
SkillsSkills
InterpersonalInterpersonal
SkillsSkills
Problem SolvingProblem Solving
SkillsSkills
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
7/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
What About Ethics Training?
Argument against ethicstraining
Personal values andvalue systems are fixedat an early age.
Arguments for ethicstraining
Values can be learnedand changed after earlychildhood.
Training helps employeesrecognize ethicaldilemmas and becomeaware of ethical issuesrelated to their actions.
Training reaffirms theorganizationsexpectation thatmembers will actethically.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
8/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Training Methods
Individual andIndividual andGroup TrainingGroup Training
MethodsMethods
Formal TrainingFormal Training
Informal TrainingInformal Training
OnOn--thethe--JobJob
TrainingTraining
OffOff--thethe--JobJob
TrainingTraining
EE--trainingtraining
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
9/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Individualizing Formal Training to Fit the
Employees Learning Style
Participation andParticipation and
ExperientialExperiential
ExercisesExercises
ReadingsReadings LecturesLectures
Visual AidsVisual Aids
LearningLearning
StylesStyles
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
10/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Performance Evaluation
Purposes of Performance Evaluation Making general human resource decisions.
Promotions, transfers, and terminations
Identifying training and development needs.
Employee skills and competencies Validating selection and development programs.
Employee performance compared to selection evaluation
and anticipated performance results ofparticipation in
training
Providing feedback to employees. The organizations view of their current performance
Supplying the basis for rewards allocation decisions.
Merit pay increases and other rewards
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
11/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Performance Evaluation (contd)
Performance Evaluation and Motivation
If employees are to be motivated to perform, then:
Performance objectives must be clear.
Performance criteria must be related to the job.
Performance must be accurately evaluated.
Performance must be properly rewarded.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
12/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Performance Evaluation (contd)
What Do We Evaluate?
TraitsTraits
Individual TaskIndividual Task
OutcomesOutcomesBehaviorsBehaviors
PerformancePerformance
EvaluationEvaluation
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
13/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Performance Evaluation (contd)
Who Should Do the Evaluating?
ImmediateImmediate
SupervisorSupervisor
PeersPeers
SelfSelf--EvaluationEvaluation
ImmediateImmediate
SubordinatesSubordinates
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
14/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
360-Degree
Evaluations
E X H I B I T 182
The primary objective of the 360-
degree performance evaluation is
to pool feedback from all of the
employees customers.
Source: Adapted fromPersonnel Journal, November 1994, p. 100.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
15/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Methods of Performance Evaluation
Written Essay
A narrative describing an employees strengths,weaknesses, past performances, potential, andsuggestions for improvement.
Critical Incidents
Evaluating the behaviors that are key in making thedifference between executing a job effectively andexecuting it ineffectively.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
16/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)
Keeps up with current
policies and regulations.
11 22 33 44 55
CompletelyCompletely
UnawareUnaware
FullyFully
InformedInformed
XX
Graphic Rating Scales
An evaluation method in which the evaluator rates
performance factors on an incremental scale.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
17/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)
Oversleeps for class.
Gets to class on time,
but nods off immediately.
Stays awake in class
but is inattentive.
Alert and takes
occasional notes.
Pays close attention and
regularly takes notes.
Passes next examination
and graduates on time.
Behaviorally AnchoredRating Scales (BARS)
Scales that combine majorelements from the critical
incident and graphic ratingscale approaches: Theappraiser rates the employeesbased on items along acontinuum, but the points areexamples of actual behavior on
a given job rather than generaldescriptions or traits.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
18/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)
Forced Comparisons Evaluating one individuals performance relative
to the performance of another individual orothers.
Group Order Ranking
An evaluation method that places employees into aparticular classification, such as quartiles.
Individual Ranking
An evaluation method that rank-orders employeesfrom best to worse.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
19/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Suggestions forImproving Performance Evaluations
Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases.Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases.
Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence.Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence.
Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy.Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy.
Provide employees with due process.Provide employees with due process.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
20/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Providing Performance Feedback
Why Managers Are Reluctant to GiveFeedback
Uncomfortable discussing performanceweaknesses directly with employees.
Employees tend to become defensive whentheir weaknesses are discussed.
Employees tend to have an inflatedassessment of their own performance.
Solutions to Improving Feedback
Train managers in giving effective feedback. Use performance review as counseling activity
than as a judgment process.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
21/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
International HR Practices: Selected Issues
Selection
Few common procedures, differ by nation.
Performance Evaluation
Not emphasized or considered appropriate in manycultures due to differences in:
Individualism versus collectivism.
Apersons relationship to the environment.
Time orientation (long- or short-term). Focus on responsibility.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
22/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Managing Diversity in Organizations
WorkWork PersonalPersonal
LifeLife
Integration or
Segmentation
WorkWork -- Life ConflictsLife Conflicts
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
23/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Work/Life Initiatives
E X H I B I T 184
Strategy Program or Policy
Time-based Flextime
strategies Job sharing
Part-time work
Leave for new parents
Telecommuting
Closing plants/offices for special occasions
Information-based Intranet work/life Web site
strategies Relocation assistance
Eldercare resources
Money-based Vouchers for child carestrategies Flexible benefits
Adoption assistance
Discounts for child care tuition
Leave with pay
Source: Based on C. A. Thompson, Managing the Work-Life Balancing Act: An Introductory
Exercise, Journal of Management Education, April 2002, p. 210; and R. Levering and M.
Moskowitz, The Best in the Worst ofTimes, Fortune, February 4, 2002, pp. 6090.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
24/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Work/Life Initiatives
E X H I B I T 184 (contd)
Strategy Program or PolicyDirect services On-site child care
Emergency back-up care
On-site health/beauty
services
Concierge services
Take-out dinners
Culture-change Training for managers to
help employees
strategies deal with work/life
conflicts
Tie manager pay to
employee satisfactionFocus on employees
actual performance,
not face time
Source: Based on C. A. Thompson, Managing the Work-Life Balancing Act: An Introductory
Exercise, Journal of Management Education, April 2002, p. 210; and R. Levering and M.
Moskowitz, The Best in the Worst ofTimes, Fortune, February 4, 2002, pp. 6090.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
25/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Managing Diversity in Organizations (contd)
Diversity Training
Participants learn to value individual differences,increase cross-cultural understanding, and confrontstereotypes.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
26/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Career Development Responsibilities
Organization Clearly communicate
organizations goalsand future strategies.
Create growthopportunities.
Offer financialassistance.
Provide time for
employees to learn.
Employees Know yourself.
Manage your reputation.
Build and maintain
network contacts. Keep current.
Balance your generalistand specialistcompetencies.
Document yourachievement.
Keep your options open.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
27/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
What are your views on work-life initiatives? What pros and
cons can you see for an
organization consideringimplementing programs of this
sort?
ChapterCheck-Up: HR Policies
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
28/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
ChapterCheck-Up: HR Policies
Marie just finished her first job interview for aMarie just finished her first job interview for a
position as a call center representative for aposition as a call center representative for a
book distributor. In her interview, she was askedbook distributor. In her interview, she was asked
if shes ever been in prison. She wonders if thisif shes ever been in prison. She wonders if this
is a usual and legal question. Your thoughts?is a usual and legal question. Your thoughts?
A question about a criminal record can only be asked if it is directly
related to the position; in this case, it is not obvious why this
position would require that information.
8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)
29/29
2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
At which stage of the
selection process do you
think a companys culture
becomes clear to an
employee? Discuss with a
classmate.
ChapterCheck-Up: HR Policies