+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ob12_18st (1)

ob12_18st (1)

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: erroy-van-radditszukage
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 29

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    1/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Human Resource

    Policies andPractices

    ChapterEIGHTEEN

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    2/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Selection Devices

    Interviews

    Are the most frequently used selection tool.

    Carry a great deal of weight in the selection process.

    Can be biased toward those who interview well. Should be structured to ensure against distortion due

    to interviewers biases.

    Are better for assessing applied mental skills,

    conscientiousness, interpersonal skills, and person-organization fit of the applicant.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    3/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    The Selection Process

    Initial Selection

    Substantive Selection

    Contingent Selection

    Applicants who dont meetbasic requirements are

    rejected.

    Applicants who meet basicrequirements, but are less

    qualified than others, are rejected.

    Applicants who are among bestqualified, but who fail contingent

    selection, are rejected.

    Applicant receives job

    offer.

    E X H I B I T 181

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    4/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Selection Devices (contd)

    Written Tests Renewed employer interest in testing applicants for:

    Intelligence: trainable to do the job?

    Aptitude: could do job?

    Ability: can do th

    e job? Interest (attitude): would/will do the job?

    Integrity: trust to do the job?

    Tests must show a valid connection to job-relatedperformance requirements.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    5/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Selection Devices (contd)

    Performance-Simulation Tests Based on job-related performance

    requirements.

    Yield validities (correlation with jobperformance) superior to written aptitude

    and personality tests.

    Work Sample Tests

    Creating a miniature replica of a job to evaluatethe performance abilities of job candidates.

    Assessment Centers

    A set of performance-simulation tests designedto evaluate a candidates managerial potential.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    6/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Training and Development Programs

    Types ofTypes of

    TrainingTraining

    Basic LiteracyBasic Literacy

    SkillsSkills

    TechnicalTechnical

    SkillsSkills

    InterpersonalInterpersonal

    SkillsSkills

    Problem SolvingProblem Solving

    SkillsSkills

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    7/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    What About Ethics Training?

    Argument against ethicstraining

    Personal values andvalue systems are fixedat an early age.

    Arguments for ethicstraining

    Values can be learnedand changed after earlychildhood.

    Training helps employeesrecognize ethicaldilemmas and becomeaware of ethical issuesrelated to their actions.

    Training reaffirms theorganizationsexpectation thatmembers will actethically.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    8/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Training Methods

    Individual andIndividual andGroup TrainingGroup Training

    MethodsMethods

    Formal TrainingFormal Training

    Informal TrainingInformal Training

    OnOn--thethe--JobJob

    TrainingTraining

    OffOff--thethe--JobJob

    TrainingTraining

    EE--trainingtraining

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    9/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Individualizing Formal Training to Fit the

    Employees Learning Style

    Participation andParticipation and

    ExperientialExperiential

    ExercisesExercises

    ReadingsReadings LecturesLectures

    Visual AidsVisual Aids

    LearningLearning

    StylesStyles

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    10/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Performance Evaluation

    Purposes of Performance Evaluation Making general human resource decisions.

    Promotions, transfers, and terminations

    Identifying training and development needs.

    Employee skills and competencies Validating selection and development programs.

    Employee performance compared to selection evaluation

    and anticipated performance results ofparticipation in

    training

    Providing feedback to employees. The organizations view of their current performance

    Supplying the basis for rewards allocation decisions.

    Merit pay increases and other rewards

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    11/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Performance Evaluation (contd)

    Performance Evaluation and Motivation

    If employees are to be motivated to perform, then:

    Performance objectives must be clear.

    Performance criteria must be related to the job.

    Performance must be accurately evaluated.

    Performance must be properly rewarded.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    12/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Performance Evaluation (contd)

    What Do We Evaluate?

    TraitsTraits

    Individual TaskIndividual Task

    OutcomesOutcomesBehaviorsBehaviors

    PerformancePerformance

    EvaluationEvaluation

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    13/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Performance Evaluation (contd)

    Who Should Do the Evaluating?

    ImmediateImmediate

    SupervisorSupervisor

    PeersPeers

    SelfSelf--EvaluationEvaluation

    ImmediateImmediate

    SubordinatesSubordinates

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    14/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    360-Degree

    Evaluations

    E X H I B I T 182

    The primary objective of the 360-

    degree performance evaluation is

    to pool feedback from all of the

    employees customers.

    Source: Adapted fromPersonnel Journal, November 1994, p. 100.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    15/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Methods of Performance Evaluation

    Written Essay

    A narrative describing an employees strengths,weaknesses, past performances, potential, andsuggestions for improvement.

    Critical Incidents

    Evaluating the behaviors that are key in making thedifference between executing a job effectively andexecuting it ineffectively.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    16/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)

    Keeps up with current

    policies and regulations.

    11 22 33 44 55

    CompletelyCompletely

    UnawareUnaware

    FullyFully

    InformedInformed

    XX

    Graphic Rating Scales

    An evaluation method in which the evaluator rates

    performance factors on an incremental scale.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    17/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)

    Oversleeps for class.

    Gets to class on time,

    but nods off immediately.

    Stays awake in class

    but is inattentive.

    Alert and takes

    occasional notes.

    Pays close attention and

    regularly takes notes.

    Passes next examination

    and graduates on time.

    Behaviorally AnchoredRating Scales (BARS)

    Scales that combine majorelements from the critical

    incident and graphic ratingscale approaches: Theappraiser rates the employeesbased on items along acontinuum, but the points areexamples of actual behavior on

    a given job rather than generaldescriptions or traits.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    18/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)

    Forced Comparisons Evaluating one individuals performance relative

    to the performance of another individual orothers.

    Group Order Ranking

    An evaluation method that places employees into aparticular classification, such as quartiles.

    Individual Ranking

    An evaluation method that rank-orders employeesfrom best to worse.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    19/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Suggestions forImproving Performance Evaluations

    Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases.Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases.

    Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence.Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence.

    Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy.Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy.

    Provide employees with due process.Provide employees with due process.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    20/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Providing Performance Feedback

    Why Managers Are Reluctant to GiveFeedback

    Uncomfortable discussing performanceweaknesses directly with employees.

    Employees tend to become defensive whentheir weaknesses are discussed.

    Employees tend to have an inflatedassessment of their own performance.

    Solutions to Improving Feedback

    Train managers in giving effective feedback. Use performance review as counseling activity

    than as a judgment process.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    21/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    International HR Practices: Selected Issues

    Selection

    Few common procedures, differ by nation.

    Performance Evaluation

    Not emphasized or considered appropriate in manycultures due to differences in:

    Individualism versus collectivism.

    Apersons relationship to the environment.

    Time orientation (long- or short-term). Focus on responsibility.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    22/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Managing Diversity in Organizations

    WorkWork PersonalPersonal

    LifeLife

    Integration or

    Segmentation

    WorkWork -- Life ConflictsLife Conflicts

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    23/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Work/Life Initiatives

    E X H I B I T 184

    Strategy Program or Policy

    Time-based Flextime

    strategies Job sharing

    Part-time work

    Leave for new parents

    Telecommuting

    Closing plants/offices for special occasions

    Information-based Intranet work/life Web site

    strategies Relocation assistance

    Eldercare resources

    Money-based Vouchers for child carestrategies Flexible benefits

    Adoption assistance

    Discounts for child care tuition

    Leave with pay

    Source: Based on C. A. Thompson, Managing the Work-Life Balancing Act: An Introductory

    Exercise, Journal of Management Education, April 2002, p. 210; and R. Levering and M.

    Moskowitz, The Best in the Worst ofTimes, Fortune, February 4, 2002, pp. 6090.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    24/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Work/Life Initiatives

    E X H I B I T 184 (contd)

    Strategy Program or PolicyDirect services On-site child care

    Emergency back-up care

    On-site health/beauty

    services

    Concierge services

    Take-out dinners

    Culture-change Training for managers to

    help employees

    strategies deal with work/life

    conflicts

    Tie manager pay to

    employee satisfactionFocus on employees

    actual performance,

    not face time

    Source: Based on C. A. Thompson, Managing the Work-Life Balancing Act: An Introductory

    Exercise, Journal of Management Education, April 2002, p. 210; and R. Levering and M.

    Moskowitz, The Best in the Worst ofTimes, Fortune, February 4, 2002, pp. 6090.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    25/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Managing Diversity in Organizations (contd)

    Diversity Training

    Participants learn to value individual differences,increase cross-cultural understanding, and confrontstereotypes.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    26/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Career Development Responsibilities

    Organization Clearly communicate

    organizations goalsand future strategies.

    Create growthopportunities.

    Offer financialassistance.

    Provide time for

    employees to learn.

    Employees Know yourself.

    Manage your reputation.

    Build and maintain

    network contacts. Keep current.

    Balance your generalistand specialistcompetencies.

    Document yourachievement.

    Keep your options open.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    27/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    What are your views on work-life initiatives? What pros and

    cons can you see for an

    organization consideringimplementing programs of this

    sort?

    ChapterCheck-Up: HR Policies

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    28/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    ChapterCheck-Up: HR Policies

    Marie just finished her first job interview for aMarie just finished her first job interview for a

    position as a call center representative for aposition as a call center representative for a

    book distributor. In her interview, she was askedbook distributor. In her interview, she was asked

    if shes ever been in prison. She wonders if thisif shes ever been in prison. She wonders if this

    is a usual and legal question. Your thoughts?is a usual and legal question. Your thoughts?

    A question about a criminal record can only be asked if it is directly

    related to the position; in this case, it is not obvious why this

    position would require that information.

  • 8/3/2019 ob12_18st (1)

    29/29

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    At which stage of the

    selection process do you

    think a companys culture

    becomes clear to an

    employee? Discuss with a

    classmate.

    ChapterCheck-Up: HR Policies


Recommended