+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are...

Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are...

Date post: 17-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: claude-oneal
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
Transcript
Page 1: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.
Page 2: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Objectives

1. Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret the absence of a direct link as the non-existence of a link.

2. Introduce two new indicators to weight the differences between causal chains of different lengths between two variables in MMDSs:

• Relative Length Difference• Relative Content Difference

Page 3: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Example SFD

Adpresence

advertisements

adobsolescence

Availablemoney

salesrevenue

ad spending

Ordersbacklog

orders

sales

Productioncapacity

price

ad unit cost

+

++

++advertising

budget

advertisingfraction

+

+

+

-

R1

effect of adpresence on

orders

+

+

otherspending

deliverydelay

Perceiveddelivery

delay

perceptionadjustment

-

+

+

effect ofperceiveddelay onorders -+

B1

perceptionadjustment time

-

-

Growth engine

Buyers'response

Page 4: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Example CLD

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

advertisementbudget

+

R1

Ad presence

effct of adpresence on

orders

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

++

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

delivery delay

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

effect of perceiveddelay on orders

+

-

+

+

-

+

- -

B1Growth engine

Buyers'response

Focus is on (chains of) causal links: no loops!

Page 5: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

MMDS1: highly disaggregated

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

advertisementbudget

Ad presence

effct of adpresence on

orders

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

delivery delay

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

effect of perceiveddelay on orders

Page 6: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

MMDS2 : without auxiliary variables

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

Ad presence

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

Page 7: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

MMDS3: without co-flows

sales

Ad presence

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

Page 8: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

MMDS4: only stocks

Ad presence

Order backlog

Availablemoney

Perceiveddelivery delay

Page 9: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Levels of aggregation

Detailed

Without auxiliaries (only stocks and flows)

Without co-flows, flow-flow connections

Only stocks, “overview”

Disaggregated

Aggregated

Page 10: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

What happens with the details?

sales

sales revenue

Availablemoney

salesAvailablemoney

Disaggregating

Aggregating

Deleted?Substituted?

Page 11: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

MMDS 1 includes MMDS 2

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

advertisementbudget

Ad presence

effct of adpresence on

orders

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

delivery delay

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

effect of perceiveddelay on orders

Page 12: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

MMDS 2 includes MMDS 3

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

Ad presence

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

Page 13: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Model variables

V[] Name MMDS 1 MMDS 2 MMDS 3 MMDS 41 Order backlog 1 1 1 12 sales 1 1 1  3 sales revenue 1 1    4 Available money 1 1 1 15 advertisement budget 1      6 ad spending 1 1 1  7 advertisements 1 1    8 Ad presence 1 1 1 19 effect of ad presence on orders 1      

10 orders 1 1 1  11 delivery delay 1      12 perception adjustment 1 1 1  13 Perceived delivery delay 1 1 1 114 effect of perceived delay on orders 1      

    14 10 8 4

Page 14: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Adjacency matrix MMDS21 Order backlog2 sales3 sales revenue4 Available money5 advertisement budget6 ad spending7 advertisements8 Ad presence9 effect of ad presence on orders

10 orders11 delivery delay12 perception adjustment13 Perceived delivery delay14 effect of perceived delay on orders

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 02 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 013 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 02 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 013 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

sales

sales revenue

Availablemoney

Page 15: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Differences with MMDS2 increase!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MMDS3 6 MMDS4 141 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 02 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 02 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

If both MMDS have the same meaning, do current methods for comparing MMDS overweight these differences?

Page 16: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

Ad presence

orders

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

Perceiveddelivery delay

perceptionadjustment

Distance matrix MMDS2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 1 2 3 0 4 5 6 0 7 0 1 2 02 7 0 1 2 0 3 4 5 0 6 0 8 9 03 6 7 0 1 0 2 3 4 0 5 0 7 8 04 5 6 7 0 0 1 2 3 0 4 0 6 7 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 4 5 6 7 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 5 6 07 3 4 5 6 0 7 0 1 0 2 0 4 5 08 2 3 4 5 0 6 7 0 0 1 0 3 4 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1 2 3 4 0 5 6 7 0 0 0 2 3 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 2 3 4 5 0 6 7 8 0 9 0 0 1 013 1 2 3 4 0 5 6 7 0 8 0 2 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 0 1 2 3 0 4 5 6 0 7 0 1 2 02 7 0 1 2 0 3 4 5 0 6 0 8 9 03 6 7 0 1 0 2 3 4 0 5 0 7 8 04 5 6 7 0 0 1 2 3 0 4 0 6 7 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 4 5 6 7 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 5 6 07 3 4 5 6 0 7 0 1 0 2 0 4 5 08 2 3 4 5 0 6 7 0 0 1 0 3 4 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1 2 3 4 0 5 6 7 0 0 0 2 3 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 2 3 4 5 0 6 7 8 0 9 0 0 1 013 1 2 3 4 0 5 6 7 0 8 0 2 0 014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 sales3 sales revenue4 Available money6 ad spending7 advertisements8 Ad presence

10 orders12 perception adjustment13 Perceived delivery delay

Page 17: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Distant, not absent

1 2 3 41 0 1 2 32 7 0 1 23 6 7 0 14 5 6 7 0

MMDS2

sales

sales revenue

Availablemoney

MMDS31 2 3 4

1 0 1 0 22 5 0 0 13 0 0 0 04 4 5 0 0

salesAvailablemoney

Page 18: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Disaggregated

Aggregated

0

+

-

Relative Length Difference

Mental models

Distance from Order backlog

to Ad presence

Difference: model -

reference

Relative

Length

difference

MMDS 2 6 0 0MMDS 1 8 2 0.33MMDS 3 4 -2 -0.33MMDS 4 2 -4 -0.67

Page 19: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

How different are the causal chains from stock to stock?

advertisements

sales

sales revenue

Ad presence

Order backlog

Availablemoney

ad spending

MMDS2

Ad presence

Order backlog

Availablemoney

MMDS4

1 Order backlog2 sales3 sales revenue4 Available money5 advertisement budget6 ad spending7 advertisements8 Ad presence

Page 20: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Relative Content DifferenceModel Variables Total

Reference 1 2 3 4 6 7 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 83 1 2 4 6 84 1 4 8

Union 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8

Variables only in the compared model Total1 5 13 04 0

Variables from reference model not in the compared model Total1 03 3 5 7 34 2 3 5 6 7 5

Differences per modelMMDS Absolute Relative

1 1 0,133 3 0,384 5 0,63

Page 21: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Length and content comparison

MMDS Relative length difference

RLD

Relative content difference

RCD

1 0.33 0.1

3 -0.33 0.4

4 -0.67 0.6

≠ absent= different (but not so much)

Distant

Page 22: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Insight

DistanceMatrix Distance in reference MMDS

Distance in a MMDS Relative Length

Difference

AdjacencyMatrix Total number of variables in the chain in all compared MMDSs

Number of different variables in a chain of an MMDS Relative Content

Difference

• A way to account for indirect causal links• Will enrich MMDS comparison methods• May enrich modeling software

Page 23: Objectives 1.Show that differences between mental models with different levels of aggregation are overstated by current comparison approaches, which interpret.

Thankyou!

Questions?


Recommended