+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

Date post: 25-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: rue
View: 35 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE. Impact of the crisis on regional economies and economic co-operation initiatives in the Black Sea and Caspian Thessaloniki, November 2009. The competitiveness challenge - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
17
OECD Private Sector Development 1 Impact of the crisis on regional economies and economic co-operation initiatives in the Black Sea and Caspian Thessaloniki, November 2009 OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE
Transcript
Page 1: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 1

Impact of the crisis on regional economies and economic co-operation initiatives in the

Black Sea and Caspian

Thessaloniki, November 2009

OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME

INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

Page 2: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 2

1. The competitiveness challenge

2. Potential policy priorities to enhance competitiveness

3. The need for a focused and demand driven regional approach

Page 3: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 3

GDP growth in the region is impacted by the financial crisisAverage GDP growth falling in 2009

Source: OECD Development Centre / IMF Source: EBRD; e. estimate; p. projection

Page 4: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 4Source: OECD Development Centre / IMF

Reliance on external financing is increasingOn average 13% of GDP for BSEC region

Page 5: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 5

How to improve both quantity and quality of FDI?

A measure of competitiveness: FDI growth is slowing downHow to support the quality and quantity of FDI?

Central Europe:

First Wave of FDI

SEE: Second wave of FDI

SCU:Third wave?

Source: EBRD Transition report 2008, OECD Analysis

Impact of the

financial crisis

estimate projection

FDI in USD million

Page 6: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 6

The region remains cost competitiveExample: Cost competitiveness in labour for the Republic of Moldova

Source: International Labour Organization; zdnetasia; Wall Street Journal, OECD interviews

Leveraging their competitive labour costs in servicesRelative comparison of average monthly labor cost in services (2005)

HungaryHungary PolandPoland CroatiaCroatia Bosnia&H

Bosnia&H

MontenegroMontenegroSerbiaSerbia R.MoldovaR.Moldova IndiaIndia

Index(100:

Hungary)

Index(100:

Hungary)

(1)(1)

Sample of CEE countries WB countries covered by the project Other references

FYR Macedonia

FYR Macedonia

AlbaniaAlbania UNMIKUNMIK

Note: Monthly wages have been calculated on 2003-05 or 2003-06 average; using the LABORSTA Labour Statistics Database and covering, unless specified only the category J (financial intermediation) and K (business activities, real estate and renting). For Albania overall figures are based on category I (transport, storage and communications) due to the absence of statistics on J/K in the ILO databases(1) average monthly wages in all services

Up to 7 timeslower

Example of SEE

Page 7: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 7

Cost competitiveness is a short term advantageThe need to move up the value-chain

Cost competitiveness is not sustainable

• Markets like India and China are clear low-cost alternatives.

• Cost levels in some sectors are increasing by up to 15% annually, impacting negatively on margins and potentially eroding market share levels.

• Limited access to finance and strategies to reinvest capital in technology and human capital is a risk.

Significant gaps in human capital limit the opportunities to move up the value chain

• Skills gaps in high growth industries such as ICT reach 60%.• Coordination between ministries of education and economy and dialogue with civil society are limited.

Limited focus on sector specific policy barriers as well value-added services

Page 8: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 8

                                                                      Policy priorities to enhance competitivenessBased on feedback from countries of the region

SustainedCompetitiveness

How to tailor human capital policies and practices to support financial and business services?

How to support FDI by removing policy barriers and supporting specific sectors?

How to address the impact of the financial crisis, especially in terms of access to finance?

Which key areas need to be address to enhance investment and competitiveness in the Black Sea (SCU)?

The need to focus on SME competitiveness

Page 9: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 9

Improving NationalCompetitiveness

Enhancing RegionalBusiness Climate

Prioritisation of policies to improve the business climatePolicy Working Groups Policy guideline and targeted implementation

OECD Sector Competitiveness StrategySurveys of investors and private sector perceptionEvaluation of policy reformsSupporting in implementing reforms

OECD Eurasia Competitiveness ProgrammeNew OECD Mandate (2008) covering two regions and 11 countries

Page 10: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 10

Example : Monitoring policies at the regional levelAddressing reforms through regional working groups and peer review

The OECD Investment Reform IndexThe SME Charter

Chaired by a country of the region and OECD country

Strong involvement of regional policy makers, private sector and OECD experts

Focused on delivering a “How To” guideline on implementation of reforms

in the targeted policy area

Regional Policy Working Group

Example for South

East Europe

1

2

3

4

5

InvestmentPolicy

InvestmentPromotion

Tax Policy Anti-Corruption

Policy

Trade Policy RegulatoryReform

HumanCapital

Page 11: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 11

                                                                     

OECD Policies for Competitiveness Assessment Framework

“Policies for Competitiveness” Dimensions

Which key topics should be addressed within each Policy Working Group?

1. Investment Climate Policy and Promotion

2. Financial Markets Development

3. Human Capital for financial and business services

4. Others

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Source: OECD PfC Assessment Framework

Page 12: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 12

Example: Investment climate policy and promotion

FDI Policy Promotion and Facilitation

Transparency

Framework• Strategy• Institutional support• Monitoring and evaluation• National and sub-national

coordination

Investment promotion services and activities

• FDI-SME linkages• One stop shop• Client relationship

management• Policy advocacy• Aftercare services• Free Economic Zones

• Publication avenues and tools

• Prior notification and stakeholder consultations

• Procedural transparency

Non-discrimination• Restrictions to national

treatment• Review of restrictions to

national treatment• Approval procedures• Admittance of business

personnel• Transfers of FDI related capital• FDI incentives• Performance requirements

Property rights• Land ownership• Titling and cadastre• Intellectual property

Investor protection• Expropriation guarantees• International agreements• Arbitration

Initial area of focusInitial area of focus

Source: OECD PfC Assessment Framework

Page 13: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 13

The need to focus on Investment Promotion and FacilitationOverall high level of reform

Source: OECD Survey

Page 14: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 14

Good FDI performance and average FDI potential

Source: UNCTAD 2004-07, Ranking of 141 countries, OECD Analysis

FDI Performance and Potential

Improvement of FDI attractiveness through policy reform

High FDI PerformanceLow FDI Performance

High FDI Potential

Low FDI Potential

FDI Inflows < 0 FDI/GDP ratio = 1(world shares)

Median of 141 countries

ArmeniaTurkey

Georgia

Azerbaijan

Hong Kong,China

Czech Republic

FDI Potential is measured through a wide set of indicators such as:

•GDP per capita and growth•Share of global exports•Share of R&D spending•Country risk•Share of world FDI stock

FDI Performance is measured through the ratio of a country‘sshare in global FDI inflowsto its share in global GDP.

Below potential Front-runners

Under-performers Above potential

Jordan

Luxembourg Norway UAE

Egypt

Kazakhstan

Page 15: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 15

Example: Developing and implementing country / sector specific competitiveness strategies

Example for

Republic of Moldova

Sector specific approaches help focus reform efforts

Page 16: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 16

Engaging the region and listening to country priorities

The initiative was formally launched at a Ministerial Conference held on 1 April 2009 at the OECD

Ministers and high-level representatives of all countries of the region (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine) adopted a statement to enhance competitiveness in the region

The conference was chaired by Poland and Sweden in collaboration with Czech EU Presidency and the EC

Strong collaboration with the private sector

Page 17: OECD EURASIA COMPETITIVENESS PROGRAMME INITIATIVE FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND UKRAINE

OECD Private Sector Development 17

Contact details

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENTDirectorate for Financial and Enterprise AffairsPrivate Sector Development Division

Fadi FarraHead Eurasia Competitiveness ProgrammeTel: + 33 1 45247820Fax : + 33 1 45249335Mobile: + 33 6 19133282e-mail: [email protected]

Daniel QuadbeckPolicy Analyst Eurasia Competitiveness ProgrammeTel: + 33 1 45247522Fax : + 33 1 45249335

e-mail: [email protected]


Recommended