+ All Categories
Home > Documents > of FC. Levitation gap (mm) Pressure (kPa)€¦ · The levitation force of the bulk sample was...

of FC. Levitation gap (mm) Pressure (kPa)€¦ · The levitation force of the bulk sample was...

Date post: 19-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Results and Discussion Conclusion Abstract Experiment Levitation Force of Bulk YBaCuO and GdBaCuO under a Low-Pressure Environment Background Yong Zhang, Jun Zheng, Botian Zheng, Hongdi Wang, and Zigang Deng Applied Superconductivity Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China. Paper ID: MT25-Mon-Af-Po1.05-10 Author: Yong Zhang E-mail: [email protected], or [email protected] Presented at 25th International Conference on Magnet Technology, 2017 Aug. 27 – Sep. 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Session: 17-E4 Lavitation and Magnetic Bearings. Measurement process Diameters: 41mm Height: 15mm Fabricated by TSMG processing The maximum trapped magnetic fields: GdBaCuO(1.47 T); YBaCuO(0.94 T) The levitation force of the bulk sample was measured under 100 kPa, 60 kPa and 20 kPa, respectively. The measurement of levitation force was conducted both in the case of ZFC and FC. In ZFC, the HTS bulks were immersed in LN2 at a height of 60 mm. This is the first step and called as “the cooling of bulk”. Then, the scroll vacuum pump was used to evacuate the chamber to one of the expected pressure. This is the second step and it will last about 5 minutes. Finally, the HTS bulk was moved at a speed of 2 mm/s from a 60-mm height to a 12-mm height above the PMG, and then returned to the height of 60 mm. The levitation force measurement in the FC condition is similar, except that the cooling height was changed to a 20-mm height above the PMG. The experimental results further proved the phenomenon that a low pressure environment is helpful to increase levitation force of HTS bulks, which is exactly an extra advantage of the combination of HTS Maglev and evacuated tube. Moreover, it is interesting to found that the same sized YBaCuO bulk is more sensitive to the pressure variation compared with GdBaCuO above the PMG. In the low pressure condition, the levitation characteristics of YBaCuO bulk were superior to those of GdBaCuO, Attributed to the increasing critical current density Jc and Tc difference. This study finds a universal phenomenon and gives a better understanding of HTS bulks working under low pressure, which is meaningful for the application of the HTS Maglev-ETT system. Levitation force in ZFC and FC condition Changes in Levitation force under low pressure environment Fig. 7. Maximum levitation force of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk at different pressures of 100 kPa, 60 kPa, and 20 kPa in the case of ZFC and FC. The HTS Maglev-ETT System (The combination of high temperature superconducting maglev technology and evacuated tube transport) parameters Length: 45m Load capability: 300 kg @ 20 mm, 1000 kg @ 10 mm Maximum speed: 25 km/h (normal pressure); 50 km/h (low pressure) Vacuum degree: 1-0.1 atm The high temperature superconducting (HTS) bulk is the core component of HTS maglev systems. For the potential application to evacuated tube transportation (ETT), it is necessary to recognize the loading capacity of the bulk under a low-pressure environment. Based on a home-made pressure- reducing platform, we investigated the levitation force of two kinds of typical bulks, that is, the same sized YBaCuO and GdBaCuO, above a Halbach permanent magnet guideway under different pressure conditions. The levitation force in the cases of zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) were measured and analyzed. Experimental re-sults show that the reduced air pressure can significantly improve the levitation force of the two kinds of bulks. The levitation force of YBaCuO and GdBaCuO has increased by 11.6% and 4.4% in the FC case, 20.3% and 13.7% in the ZFC case under 20 kPa compared with the atmospheric pressure (100 kPa), respectively. This universal phenomenon was explained by the increasing critical current density Jc of HTS bulks due to cooler liquid nitrogen under the low-pressure condition. It is interesting to find that the YBaCuO bulk was more sensitive to the pressure variation compared with the GdBaCuO bulk. This difference reflects the improvement extent of levitation force of HTS bulks with different Jc performance working in a low-pressure environment. Keywords: Levitation force, YBaCuO, GdBaCuO, Low pressure, Evacuated tube transportation Sample -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 (a) X (mm) Magnetic flux density (T) |Bx| |Bz| 30 60 mm 12 mm Motion direction Bulk Steel Nd-Fe-B Magnetization direction Z X Vacuum meter Home-made pressure-reducing platform Scroll vacuum pump Force test unit Control system 10 20 30 40 50 60 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 GdBaCuO YBaCuO P = 100 kPa Levitation force (N) Levitation gap (mm) (a) 10 20 30 40 50 60 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 (b) Levitation force (N) Levitation gap (mm) GdBaCuO YBaCuO P = 60 kPa 10 20 30 40 50 60 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 GdBaCuO YBaCuO P = 20 kPa Levitation force (N) Levitation gap (mm) (c) 12 14 16 18 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (a) GdBaCuO YBaCuO P = 100 kPa Levitation force (N) Levitation gap (mm) 12 14 16 18 20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Levitation force (N) Levitation gap (mm) GdBaCuO YBaCuO P = 60 kPa (b) 12 14 16 18 20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 (c) GdBaCuO YBaCuO P = 20 kPa Levitation force (N) Levitation gap (mm) 20 40 60 80 100 60 80 100 120 140 Maximum levitation force (N) Pressure (kPa) GdBaCuO (ZFC) YBaCuO (ZFC) GdBaCuO (FC) YBaCuO (FC) Fig. 5. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case of ZFC. Pressure 100 kPa 60 kPa 20 kPa YBCO GdBCO YBCO GdBCO YBCO GdBCO ZFC (N) 120.5 121.7 130.4 128.2 145.2 138.4 Increase ratio 8.2% 5.3% 20.3% 13.7% FC (N) 54.4 55.0 56.4 55.4 60.7 57.4 Increase ratio 3.8% 0.7% 11.6% 4.4% Fig. 6. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case of FC. TABLE I CAMPARISON OF THE MAXIMUM LEVITATION FORCE OF YBACUO AND GDBACUO IN DIFFERENT PRESURE AND THE INCREASE RATIO OF THE MAXIMUM LEVITATION FORCE COMPARED WITH 100 KPA CONDITION IN THE CASE OF ZFC AND FC Acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51375404, the Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Fund under Grant 2016JQ0039, and by the State Key Laboratory of Traction Power at Southwest Jiaotong University under Grant 2015TPL_Z02 and 2016TPL_T01). (Corresponding author: Zigang Deng.) Reference [1] J. Wang, et al., “The first man-loading high temperature superconducting Maglev test vehicle in the world,” Physica C, vol. 378–381, pp. 809–814, Oct,2002. [2] B. Zheng, et al., “Levitation performance of YBCO bulks in supercooling condition under a low-pressure environment,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 3600405, Jun. 2017. [3] T. Suzuki, et al., “A study on levitation force and its time relaxation behavior for a bulk superconductor- magnet system,” Physica C, vol. 468, pp. 1461–1464, May 2008. Fig. 1. The photo of HTS Maglev-ETT test system. Fig. 2. Top views of the experimental HTS bulk samples. (a) YBaCuO, (b) GdBaCuO, both of which are divided to the four-fold growth sectors by two orthogonal growth sector boundaries. Fig. 3. The magnetic flux density distribution of the applied PMG along its transverse direction at a height of 12 mm and the schematic diagram of the measurement position and motion direction of the bulk in the experiments. Fig. 4. Photograph of the HTS maglev measurement system together with a home- made pressure- reducing platform.
Transcript
  • Re

    sult

    s an

    d D

    iscu

    ssio

    n

    Conclusion

    Ab

    stra

    ct

    Exp

    eri

    me

    nt

    Levitation Force of Bulk YBaCuO and GdBaCuO under a Low-Pressure Environment

    Background

    Yong Zhang, Jun Zheng, Botian Zheng, Hongdi Wang, and Zigang Deng Applied Superconductivity Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.

    Paper ID: MT25-Mon-Af-Po1.05-10 Author: Yong Zhang E-mail: [email protected], or [email protected]

    Presented at 25th International Conference on Magnet Technology, 2017 Aug. 27 – Sep. 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Session: 17-E4 Lavitation and Magnetic Bearings.

    Measurement process

    •Diameters: 41mm •Height: 15mm Fabricated by TSMG processing The maximum trapped magnetic fields: GdBaCuO(1.47 T); YBaCuO(0.94 T)

    The levitation force of the bulk sample was measured under 100 kPa, 60 kPa and 20 kPa, respectively. The measurement of levitation force was conducted both in the case of ZFC and FC. In ZFC, the HTS bulks were immersed in LN2 at a height of 60 mm. This is the first step and called as “the cooling of bulk”. Then, the scroll vacuum pump was used to evacuate the chamber to one of the expected pressure. This is the second step and it will last about 5 minutes. Finally, the HTS bulk was moved at a speed of 2 mm/s from a 60-mm height to a 12-mm height above the PMG, and then returned to the height of 60 mm. The levitation force measurement in the FC condition is similar, except that the cooling height was changed to a 20-mm height above the PMG.

    The experimental results further proved the phenomenon that a low pressure environment is helpful to increase levitation force of HTS bulks, which is exactly an extra advantage of the combination of HTS Maglev and evacuated tube.

    Moreover, it is interesting to found that the same sized YBaCuO bulk is more sensitive to the pressure variation compared with GdBaCuO above the PMG. In the low pressure condition, the levitation characteristics of YBaCuO bulk were superior to those of GdBaCuO, Attributed to the increasing critical current density Jc and Tc difference.

    This study finds a universal phenomenon and gives a better understanding of HTS bulks working under low pressure, which is meaningful for the application of the HTS Maglev-ETT system.

    Levitation force in ZFC and FC condition Changes in Levitation force under low pressure environment

    Fig. 7. Maximum levitation force of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk at different pressures of 100 kPa, 60 kPa, and 20 kPa in the case of ZFC and FC.

    The HTS Maglev-ETT System (The combination of high temperature superconducting maglev technology and evacuated tube transport) parameters Length: 45m Load capability: 300 kg @ 20 mm, 1000 kg @ 10 mm Maximum speed: 25 km/h (normal pressure); 50 km/h (low pressure) Vacuum degree: 1-0.1 atm

    The high temperature superconducting (HTS) bulk is the core component of HTS maglev systems. For the potential application to evacuated tube transportation (ETT), it is necessary to recognize the loading capacity of the bulk under a low-pressure environment. Based on a home-made pressure-reducing platform, we investigated the levitation force of two kinds of typical bulks, that is, the same sized YBaCuO and GdBaCuO, above a Halbach permanent magnet guideway under different pressure conditions. The levitation force in the cases of zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) were measured and analyzed. Experimental re-sults show that the reduced air pressure can significantly improve the levitation force of the two kinds of bulks. The levitation force of YBaCuO and GdBaCuO has increased by 11.6% and 4.4% in the FC case, 20.3% and 13.7% in the ZFC case under 20 kPa compared with the atmospheric pressure (100 kPa), respectively. This universal phenomenon was explained by the increasing critical current density Jc of HTS bulks due to cooler liquid nitrogen under the low-pressure condition. It is interesting to find that the YBaCuO bulk was more sensitive to the pressure variation compared with the GdBaCuO bulk. This difference reflects the improvement extent of levitation force of HTS bulks with different Jc performance working in a low-pressure environment. Keywords: Levitation force, YBaCuO, GdBaCuO, Low pressure, Evacuated tube transportation

    Sample

    -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160-0.5

    -0.4

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5(a)

    X (mm)

    Mag

    net

    ic f

    lux

    den

    sity

    (T

    )

    |Bx|

    |Bz|

    30

    60 mm

    12 mm

    Motion

    direction

    Bulk

    Steel Nd-Fe-B Magnetization direction

    ZX

    Vacuum

    meter

    Home-made

    pressure-reducing

    platform Scroll vacuum pump

    Force test unit

    Control system

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    (a)

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    (b)

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    (c)

    Fig. 4. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of ZFC.

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    (a)

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    (b)

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    (c)

    Fig. 4. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of ZFC.

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    (a)

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    (b)

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    10 20 30 40 50 60-20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    (c)

    Fig. 4. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of ZFC.

    12 14 16 18 20

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    (a)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    (b)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    (c)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    Fig. 5. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of FC.

    20 40 60 80 100

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Max

    imu

    m l

    evit

    atio

    n f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Pressure (kPa)

    GdBaCuO (ZFC)

    YBaCuO (ZFC)

    GdBaCuO (FC)

    YBaCuO (FC)

    Fig. 6. Maximum levitation force of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO

    bulk at different pressures of 100 kPa, 60 kPa, and 20 kPa in the case of

    ZFC and FC.

    12 14 16 18 20

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    (a)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    (b)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    (c)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    Fig. 5. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of FC.

    20 40 60 80 100

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Max

    imum

    lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Pressure (kPa)

    GdBaCuO (ZFC)

    YBaCuO (ZFC)

    GdBaCuO (FC)

    YBaCuO (FC)

    Fig. 6. Maximum levitation force of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO

    bulk at different pressures of 100 kPa, 60 kPa, and 20 kPa in the case of

    ZFC and FC.

    12 14 16 18 20

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    (a)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    (b)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    (c)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    Fig. 5. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of FC.

    20 40 60 80 100

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Max

    imu

    m l

    evit

    atio

    n f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Pressure (kPa)

    GdBaCuO (ZFC)

    YBaCuO (ZFC)

    GdBaCuO (FC)

    YBaCuO (FC)

    Fig. 6. Maximum levitation force of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO

    bulk at different pressures of 100 kPa, 60 kPa, and 20 kPa in the case of

    ZFC and FC.

    12 14 16 18 20

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    (a)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 100 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion

    fo

    rce

    (N)

    Levitation gap (mm)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 60 kPa

    (b)

    12 14 16 18 20-10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    (c)

    GdBaCuO

    YBaCuO

    P = 20 kPa

    Lev

    itat

    ion f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Levitation gap (mm)

    Fig. 5. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk

    under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case

    of FC.

    20 40 60 80 100

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Max

    imu

    m l

    evit

    atio

    n f

    orc

    e (N

    )

    Pressure (kPa)

    GdBaCuO (ZFC)

    YBaCuO (ZFC)

    GdBaCuO (FC)

    YBaCuO (FC)

    Fig. 6. Maximum levitation force of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO

    bulk at different pressures of 100 kPa, 60 kPa, and 20 kPa in the case of

    ZFC and FC.

    Fig. 5. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case of ZFC.

    Pressure 100 kPa 60 kPa 20 kPa

    YBCO GdBCO YBCO GdBCO YBCO GdBCO

    ZFC (N) 120.5 121.7 130.4 128.2 145.2 138.4

    Increase ratio

    — — 8.2% 5.3% 20.3% 13.7%

    FC (N) 54.4 55.0 56.4 55.4 60.7 57.4

    Increase ratio

    — — 3.8% 0.7% 11.6% 4.4%

    Fig. 6. Levitation force curves of the YBaCuO bulk and GdBaCuO bulk under the pressures of (a) 100 kPa, (b) 60 kPa, and (c) 20 kPa in the case of FC.

    TABLE I CAMPARISON OF THE MAXIMUM LEVITATION FORCE OF YBACUO AND GDBACUO IN DIFFERENT PRESURE AND THE INCREASE RATIO OF THE MAXIMUM LEVITATION FORCE COMPARED WITH 100 KPA CONDITION IN THE CASE OF ZFC AND FC

    Acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51375404, the Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Fund under Grant 2016JQ0039, and by the State Key Laboratory of Traction Power at Southwest Jiaotong University under Grant 2015TPL_Z02 and 2016TPL_T01). (Corresponding author: Zigang Deng.)

    Reference [1] J. Wang, et al., “The first man-loading high temperature superconducting Maglev test vehicle in the world,” Physica C, vol. 378–381, pp. 809–814, Oct,2002. [2] B. Zheng, et al., “Levitation performance of YBCO bulks in supercooling condition under a low-pressure environment,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 3600405, Jun. 2017. [3] T. Suzuki, et al., “A study on levitation force and its time relaxation behavior for a bulk superconductor-magnet system,” Physica C, vol. 468, pp. 1461–1464, May 2008.

    Fig. 1. The photo of HTS Maglev-ETT test system.

    Fig. 2. Top views of the experimental HTS bulk samples. (a) YBaCuO, (b) GdBaCuO, both of which are divided to the four-fold growth sectors by two orthogonal growth sector boundaries.

    Fig. 3. The magnetic flux density distribution of the applied PMG along its transverse direction at a height of 12 mm and the schematic diagram of the measurement position and motion direction of the bulk in the experiments.

    Fig. 4. Photograph of the HTS maglev measurement system together with a home-made pressure-reducing platform.

    mailto:[email protected]

Recommended