+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Officer Evaluation System

Officer Evaluation System

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: taline
View: 27 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Officer Evaluation System. Overview. Performance Feedback Performance Reporting Career Progression System. Officer Evaluation System. OPR. PFW. PRF. Performance Feedback. Feedback is the single most important means for changing behavior. Types of Feedback. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
26
Officer Evaluation System 1
Transcript
Page 1: Officer Evaluation System

Officer EvaluationSystem

1

Page 2: Officer Evaluation System

2

• Performance Feedback• Performance Reporting• Career Progression System

Overview

Page 3: Officer Evaluation System

Officer Evaluation System

3

PFW OPR

PRF

Page 4: Officer Evaluation System

4

Performance Feedback

Feedback is the single most important means for changing behavior

Page 5: Officer Evaluation System

5

Types of Feedback

• Day-to-day pats on the back• Performance Feedback Sessions (PFS)–A scheduled session between the rater & ratee• Documented on a form

–Signed by both individuals, original goes to ratee

Page 6: Officer Evaluation System

Officer Evaluation System

6

PFW OPR

PRF

Page 7: Officer Evaluation System

7

The Evaluation Process• Observation• Evaluation• Documentation

Performance Reporting

Page 8: Officer Evaluation System

8

• Observation– Requires planning & preparation– Requires communication– Requires feedback

• Evaluation– Judge observed performance vs:• Predetermined standards• Performance of others• Members of the same “AFSC and Grade”

Performance Reporting

Page 9: Officer Evaluation System

9

• Documentation– Records the results– Provides a long term record of an officer’s

professional development– Primary instrument for identifying best qualified

Performance Reporting

Page 10: Officer Evaluation System

10

• Officer Performance Report (OPR)– Completed Annually– Change of Reporting Official (CRO)– Minimum 120 days of supervision– AF Form 707

Performance Reporting

Page 11: Officer Evaluation System

11

AF FORM 707

Front Back

Page 12: Officer Evaluation System

12

• Performance standards are the same for all grades• Performance factors summarized on front of form– Mark “Does Not Meet” if evaluator’s comments make the

report referral, or if a performance factor in Section IX on reverse is marked “Does Not Meet Standards”

• Fitness exemption captured on the front of the form

AF FORM 707

Page 13: Officer Evaluation System

13

• Rater Overall Assessment– 6 lines– Must be bullet format

AF FORM 707

Page 14: Officer Evaluation System

14

• Performance Factors– Same for all ranks– Only mark if officer does not meet the standard

AF FORM 707

Page 15: Officer Evaluation System

15

• Referral Letter– Included on back of report

AF FORM 707

Page 16: Officer Evaluation System

16

• Inappropriate Comments– Charges/investigations not completed or acquittals– Recommendations for decorations– Race, gender, age, religion, etc. of ratee– Drug/Alcohol abuse rehabilitation programs– Previous ratings or reports– Developmental education (completion or

enrollment)– Advanced academic education– Promotion recommendations

Performance Reporting

Page 17: Officer Evaluation System

17

• Other Types of Performance Reports– Training Report (AF Form 475)• Used for training of 8 weeks or more• Filed upon completion, interruption, or elimination from

training– Letter of Evaluation (AF Form 77)• Used when ratee is away from reporting official• CRO with less than 120 days of supervision• Under supervision of someone other than your

supervisor• Provides input to rater

Performance Reporting

Page 18: Officer Evaluation System

18

• Uses of Performance Reports– Promotions– Assignments– Investigations– Disciplinary/Legal Actions– NOT used as counseling tools

Performance Reporting

Page 19: Officer Evaluation System

19

• The Appeal Process–Ratee must prove that report is inaccurate or

unjust–Rating can be upgraded or removed–MPF will assist in preparing package–Decided by AFPC–Have up to three years to contest a report

Performance Reporting

Page 20: Officer Evaluation System

Officer Evaluation System

20

PFW OPR

PRF

Page 21: Officer Evaluation System

21

Career Progression System

Objective:To provide the rank/grade commensurate with

each position’s responsibility and leadership requirement

Page 22: Officer Evaluation System

22

Officer Promotion System

Desired Objectives for Promotion

0-2 (1st Lt) 2 Years

0-3 (Capt) 4 Years

0-4 (Maj) 11 Years

0-5 (Lt Col) 16 Years

0-6 (Col) 21-22 Years

Page 23: Officer Evaluation System

23

Officer Promotion System (cont.)

• Fully Qualified: For promotion from 2d Lt to 1st Lt• Best Qualified: For promotion to Capt thru Col• Promotion Zones–Below the Primary Zone (BPZ)

• First opportunity is promotion to O-5 (Lt Col) –In the Primary Zone (IPZ)–Above the Primary Zone (APZ)

Page 24: Officer Evaluation System

24

Promotion Recommendations

• Prepared by Senior Rater• “Best Qualified” Based on Performance

and Performance - Based Potential• No earlier than 60 Days before the

Selection Board

Page 25: Officer Evaluation System

• “Definitely Promote”- strength of performance

and potential warrants promotion

• “Promote”- qualified for promotion, compete on basis of performance, potential, etc...

• “Do Not Promote”- promotion not warranted

Promotion Recommendations

Page 26: Officer Evaluation System

26

Summary

– Performance Feedback– Performance Reporting• The Evaluation Process• OPR• Inappropriate Comments• Other Types of Performance Reports• Uses of Reports• The Appeal Process

– Career Progression System


Recommended