April 2015 Page 1
West Coast Driller
A Publication of the West Coast American Association of Drilling Engineers
P.O. Box 9953, Bakersfield, CA 93389
www.aade.org April 2015
Monthly Technical Forum
April 16th, 2015
Topic
Continuous Circulation
Drilling Technology
Time
5:30 PM Social Hour
6:30 PM Dinner
7 PM Technical Forum
Place
Rice Bowl
Cost
$25 if RSVP
RSVP
https://
www.123signup.com/
event?id=yrnkd
2015 Board of Directors
OFFICERS
President Steve Johnson E & B 616-6165
1st VP Craig Hossfeld CRC 428-4470
2ndVP Tom Shimura Chevron 316-9169
Treasurer Jason Mundorf SJ Bit 201-6704
Secretary Josh Kyles GeoGuidance 304-7577
CHAPTER REPRESENTATIVE
Danny Moreno Nalco 598-3163
The March 20th Golf Tournament at Sundale Country
Club was a wonderful success with nothing but sunny
skies and golfers in fine spirits. Thanks to all the partici-
pants and sponsors.
April's Monthly AADE Forum Meeting is to be
Thursday, April 16th. This month’s presentation will be
given by Adam Keith, Operations Engineer & Total Con-
trol Product Specialist for Canrig Drilling Technology,
Ltd. Mr. Keith will be presenting information on the exe-
cution of continuous circulation drilling technology along
with history of the technology, its applicability, benefits
and safety concerns.
Don't you just love springtime drilling in the Oil
From the President Patch? It is difficult to not be optimistic. I've been in-
terested in Mother Nature for some time now. I have
explained my fascination with Drilling Engineering to
non-engineers by explaining that Mother Nature has
wonderful riches, but she never gives them up easily.
Solving her riddles, while trying to exploit her petro-
leum resources through drilling, is always an interest-
ing challenge. It is enjoyable working in the upstream
side of the energy industry as the mysteries of Mother
Nature can be resolved with a thorough study and ap-
plication of physics and chemistry. I am not sure I
could survive a life in the mid- or down-stream seg-
ments of the energy industry since much of the focus
STEERING COMMITTEE Travis Adams Geo 325-5919
David Arias Kenai 304-0066
Danny Caraan Weir 303-8615
Jim Cessar Baker Hughes 699-3704
Brad Elliot Seneca 391-3545
Jim Fox Driltek 327-3021
Clayton Gossett CRC 477-3992
Chad Hoggard Patterson 203-5015
Fred Holmes Holmes Western 763-1537
Brian Krause SJ Bit 448-2074
Larry Lorenz Ensign 589-0111
Danny McCall Di Drill 345-3979
Trent Rosenlieb Linn Energy 616-3813
Wyatt Shipley Vaquero 444-0888
Tim Spriet Driltek 327-3021
Pat Sullivan Ensign 201-7722
Tim Zdarko Aera 665-5356
April 2015 Page 2
has little, to nothing, to do with the rational, hard sci-
ences. There are many questions that arise throughout
the activities of downstream experts that can only be
described as rationally unanswerable questions. Some,
not any less bewildering than, have the Easter Bunny
and Santa Claus ever met?
Of all the many things that have me wondering
why they are as they are, the one preventing me from
fully enjoying spring in Kern County Oil Patch this
spring is, why for as long as I have been filling my own
gas tanks (and that is since my first fill up of regular
cost $0.449/gallon) has the price differential between
the grades been fixed, more or less, at 10 cents per gal-
lon. Surely you can understand my bafflement and lack
of merriment with the answer to such an obviously
troubling question not being extensively-known com-
mon knowledge. There are times I find myself optimis-
tic when I remember there initially were but two grades
of gasoline; Ethyl and Regular. Alas, my optimism has,
as yet, always been unfounded as I have not discovered
any link to the introduction of unleaded to the explana-
tion of why the differential price between low
(regular), middle and high (ethyl) grade gasoline is es-
sentially always fixed at 10¢.
My frustration increased about ten years ago when
I started noticing the occasional Mobil station with
posted price differentials of 8¢ between unleaded-
regular and regular-super. Now, in California, as I was
observing all this, the ratings on the different fuels
were labeled as 87, 89 and 91 octane.
So, clearly the remaining, troubling, unanswered
question is why does the value for energy content of
higher octane fuel decrease as the price of gasoline in-
crease? Should the price of gasoline be proportional to
its energy content, would not the marginal cost,
and thus, the differential between fuel grades fluc-
tuate with the base price (energy content) of regu-
lar gas? Is it the exuberantly irrational individuals
of the marketing departments that create the condi-
tion of higher energy fuel (higher octane) being
more economical, or is there some other reason to
explain how marketing teams have been able to
pull one over on so many for so long. Is it that mar-
keters never understood Economics 101? Or could
it be that there is no fuel difference between octane
grades and the added dimes per gallon over the
many decades has been an outrageous, unjustifiable
windfall?
When burdened with a far-too-long commute
between Palm Desert and the Salton Sea south
shore, I was able to perform an experiment evaluat-
ing the correlation between fuel octane and miles
per gallon (or more important; dollars per mile).
The hypothesis to be tested was, “Is the marginal
cost of fuel proportional to cost of different fuel
grades?” As the price of gasoline increases, yet the
differential between grades remains constant, the
benefit of choosing ethyl, i.e. higher grade, over
regular (base octane) becomes more economically
savvy. Mathematically the issue is more prominent.
I am wondering when the gasoline marketers
will rationalize the gasoline grade price differential
to reflect the economic reality of marginal pump
pricing between high, medium & low octane rat-
ings.
I will leave it to the reader to determine at what
pump price the drivers of this fine land will most
easily be able to start eschewing regular for ethyl
April 2015 Page 3
gasoline.
With a combination of Junior High Algebra and Econ
101 it is straight forward to determine if any particu-
lar vehicle can be more economically operated using
ethyl or a lower octane fuel.
The individual experiments were conducted by
tracking the volume (gallons) to fill the gas tank for
each trip to the gas station and the odometer readings
between fill ups. The subject vehicle was a 2001
Mercury Marquis. I found that there were measurable
differences between the three octane grades in both
"city" & "highway" driving conditions. See nearby
graph. In the graph the straight lines indicate 15, 20
& 25 MPG. There was much more variation in
"city" driving conditions which made the evaluation
results less distinct. The mileage difference between
octane blends was much less than between highway
mileage (less than four stop/starts per 75 mile cruise
control segments) and city driving (more than 4
stop/starts per 10 mile random speed segments).
Steve Johnson
E&B Natural Resources Management Corp.
April 2015 Page 4
Guest Speaker: Adam Keith, Operations Engineer & Total
Control Product Specialist for Canrig Drilling Technology, Ltd.
Adam is the Operations Engineer & Product Specialist for the Total Control group at Canrig Drilling
Technology, Ltd. Starting with the company near the inception of the product line in June 2012,
Adam plays an integral part in the design, development, and direction of Canrig’s Total Control
services department including writing the operations manual for the Non-Stop Driller continuous
circulation system and providing engineering support to current operations around the world. He also
serves as Competency Assessor for the product line technicians and a Canrig Trainer for drilling
processes.
Adam holds a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University where he taught upper level
courses in Pressure Transient Testing Analysis/Well Performance and Petroleum Production Systems. He
also is a two-time recipient of the W. D. Von Gonten & Co. Scholarship and was third place winner of
the 2012 Student Paper Contest inspired by his time as a roughneck in South Texas.
Calendar Events 2015
4/16/2015 Technical Forum Meeting
5/21/2015 Technical Forum Meeting
5/22/2015 AADE Sporting Clay Shoot
6/18/2015 Technical Forum Meeting
7/16/2015 Technical Forum Meeting
*This schedule is tentative and subject to change*
April 2015 Page 5
Well let me just start by saying that I was born in Pharr, Texas in 1954 which might explain my
stubbornness, but my family was migrant farm workers and we came to stay in California when I was
about 3 yrs. old. My Dad took a job for a farmer which was developing a farm west of Blackwell’s
Corner right before going out of the valley. After a couple of years we moved outside of Buttonwillow
where I attended elementary school then graduated out of Shafter High School in 1973. With help
from my best friend and some of his brothers, 4 that worked at Daces & Witte (later became Witte
Enterprises) were able to convince Phil Witte and Bill Scurlock that I would be good man for the job.
It seemed in those days if you didn’t know someone that was willing to introduce you and take a little
responsibility it was pretty hard to get a job in the oil industry. Although I didn’t know that at the time
but this was the beginning of my oilfield career. I started on a work over rig and then production rig I
quickly realized I liked work over a whole lot better, but in time I learn to do both. I got set up to an
operator a couple of years later, at that time I really enjoyed the work over jobs, we at Witte worked
for many of the small operators and most of the majors, drilling/re-drills/fracing/acidizing no jobs to
big or small it was and always will be a learning experience.
Then one day out of necessity they needed a tool-pusher and again I was at the right place at
the right time. I began doing a lot of the work-over jobs for Union Oil Co. In 1979 Witte Enterp.
bought a brand new 250K Hopper Rig that at that time was one of the biggest in the state, it opened up
the deep well market for us. Mr. Witte and Mr. Scurlock spent a lot of money and time on us and
equipment developing this rig. High pressure deep wells became a trademark for our little company for
years we were a thorn in the side of all the big service companies in this area. We got our jobs not with
cheap rates but with good work Mr. Witte believed in that and our superintend believed in good work
for good wages so it balanced out. Somewhere around 1980 I met a gentleman by the name of Jack
Cook, well I guess he liked my work which started a friendship and business relation that is still going
on. He used our rig and me for most of the work he and his people did in the central valley. In 1981 he
had me take my rig to the Tulare Lake Bottom, working 24/7 for 5 yrs. With him and his personal. I
don’t think I’ll ever forgive him for that. But life went on, I continued watching rigs until March of
1998, at that time my wife and I started Oilwell Consultant Svc. Oh, yes somewhere along the way I
got married and raised 3-kids. Back to the oilfield, I worked for many of the independent oil producers
and few of the majors. Then about 5 years ago I started working with Mr. Cook again as a well site
consultant. These last few years have been pretty wild but it’s all been good. I still enjoy the oil busi-
ness so I guess you’re stuck with me for a while longer.
Oh, my family. I married Janet in 1982 that had 2 children Trin and Brandie and in 1983 we
had a little girl Ashley. All our kids and families live here in Bakersfield, our oldest son is an A/C
specialist and our older daughter a housewife, our youngest took a different path. Ashley Bylow now,
graduated from San Jose State with a degree in Environmental Science and works for Enviro-Tech
here in town.
Thank You for allowing me to write this…Baldemar”K.C.”Torres.
LMOTM: KC Torres (Ollwell Consultant SVC)
April 2015 Page 6
April 2015 Page 7
Congrats to Tubular Inspection!!
Get your recipes ready for next
year!!!!
April 2015 Page 14
$25.00