+ All Categories
Home > Environment > Oil palm and Green Economy in Indonesia: lessons from East Kalimantan

Oil palm and Green Economy in Indonesia: lessons from East Kalimantan

Date post: 15-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: center-for-international-forestry-research-cifor
View: 717 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
16
Oil palm and Green Economy in Indonesia: lessons from East Kalimantan LEDs Asia Forum, Jogjakarta, 10-13 November 2014 Krystof Obidzinski, CIFOR
Transcript

Oil palm and Green Economy in Indonesia: lessons from East Kalimantan

LEDs Asia Forum, Jogjakarta, 10-13 November 2014

Krystof Obidzinski, CIFOR

1. Background: Indonesia CO2 emissions

1.2 Gt

2. GHG emissions in East Kalimantan

3. GHG emissions and Green Economy in E. Kalimantan

BAU Scenario

GE = Reduce GHG 15.7% by 2020 (RAN-GRK)

Source: McKinsey Report

4. Green Economy in East Kalimantan and GHG emissions

68 57.32

52

43.48

50

42.15

35

29.51

20

16.86

20

16.86

4

3.37

2

1.69

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2010 2020

Oil Palm Agriculture Forestry Mining Construction Petroleum dan Refining Manufacturing Services

Reduce GHG from OP by 10 M tons

Source: McKinsey Report

5. Scenarios

6. GHG implications of scenarios

The total of current carbon stock is 1,811,356,370.91 Tons CO2eq

6. GHG implications of scenarios

Saved Converted Saved Converted

Below ground Above ground

Scenario 1 0.00 -1438015365.77 0.00 221033821.40

Scenario 2 -808750110.96 -665605791.93 87107274.05 240243665.28

Scenario 3 -1590322549.47 0.00 222231587.19 98518475.67

-2500.00

-2000.00

-1500.00

-1000.00

-500.00

0.00

500.00

1000.00

Mill

ion

s

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Landcover in East Kalimantan in 2011

Land cover in East Kalimantan under Scenario 1

Land cover in East Kalimantan under Scenario 2

Land cover in East Kalimantan under Scenario 3

Indicative value of ecosystem services Lost under each scenario

25.73

20.01

6.27

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

SCENARIO 1

SCENARIO 2

SCENARIO 3

USD Billions

Source: Constanza et al 2014

Conclusions Scenario 3 most optimal for GHG reduction in OP to

meet the Green Economy target

PES loss also lowest

However, Scenario 3 results in 1.6 M ha (50%) of allocated plantation area being taken out of development

Degraded land is all under commercial concessions and thus unavailable to offset the loss of the plantation area

Scenario 3 has the additionality of 100M tons of CO2 eq, thus the cut off threshold of 35 tons of CO2 /ha could be adjusted upwards to 45-50 tons of CO2 /ha

This would enable OP to be in line with the GE target and keep the loss of the plantation area to below 1 M ha

Commercial land availability in East Kalimantan


Recommended