+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - University of...

OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - University of...

Date post: 29-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
6 N 5 4 3 2 1 N 2 1 2 6 W 2 5 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 9 1 8 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 W 1 E 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 E C I M A R R O N T E X A S B E A V E R H A R P E R W O O D S W O O D W A R D E L L I S R O G E R M I L L S D E W E Y C U S T E R B E C K H A M W A S H I T A G R E E R H A R M O N J A C K S O N K I O W A T I L L M A N C O T T O N C O M A N C H E S T E P H E N S J E F F E R S O N L O V E C A R T E R M A R S H A L L J O H N S T O N A T O K A B R Y A N C H O C T A W P U S H M A T A H A M C C U R T A I N L E F L O R E L A T I M E R P I T T S B U R G C O A L P O N T O T O C M U R R A Y G A R V I N C A D D O G R A D Y C A N A D I A N B L A I N E K I N G F I S H E R M A J O R A L F A L F A G R A N T G A R F I E L D K A Y N O B L E O S A G E P A W N E E W A S H I N G T O N N O W A T A C R A I G O T T A W A D E L A W A R E M A Y E S A D A I R C H E R O K E E M U S K O G E E S E Q U O Y A H H A S K E L L R O G E R S T U L S A W A G O N E R O K M U L G E E M C I N T O S H H U G H E S S E M I N O L E O K F U S K E E C R E E K C L E V E L A N D M C C L A I N P O T T A W A T O M I E O K L A H O M A L I N C O L N L O G A N P A Y N E 9 5 ° 9 6 ° 9 7 ° 9 8 ° 3 4 ° 9 9 ° 3 5 ° 1 0 0 ° 3 6 ° 3 7 ° 1 0 3 ° 1 0 2 ° 1 0 1 ° 7 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 1 2 0 1 9 1 8 1 S 1 0 S 9 8 6 5 4 3 2 2 6 2 5 2 4 2 3 2 2 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 7 E 1 E 2 7 2 8 2 9 N 2 8 E 1 E 2 9 N 1 N 1 W 8 1 9 8 2 1 N 1 1 2 9 N 3 5 ° 4 9 5 ° 1 6 1 7 9 1 8 2 3 2 1 0 1 4 6 1 3 2 2 1 4 5 1 7 5 2 4 1 6 8 1 1 1 8 1 6 7 6 1 7 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 0 9 1 0 0 ° 1 3 2 5 1 2 2 4 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 7 ° 4 1 8 5 2 5 W 2 3 6 2 7 1 0 3 4 3 1 0 1 7 1 9 9 1 5 9 4 1 9 7 2 5 1 8 7 7 1 0 2 ° 1 4 2 3 1 6 2 3 6 2 2 2 5 W 2 0 1 E 8 1 9 2 6 8 3 8 3 1 0 5 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 8 1 7 2 8 1 N 2 7 2 7 2 4 2 1 1 1 9 7 1 8 1 5 2 4 E 2 3 1 4 3 6 ° 2 4 2 2 9 9 ° 1 6 5 2 1 7 2 3 6 9 6 ° 2 4 7 2 1 7 4 2 1 1 2 9 2 6 2 2 2 0 2 0 3 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 2 1 3 1 3 1 W 4 5 1 2 3 4 ° 1 0 1 ° 6 1 9 7 9 8 ° 1 5 1 5 6 1 S 1 4 5 2 6 7 4 2 8 1 1 2 5 5 2 6 1 2 1 5 2 2 2 2 1 8 2 0 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 3 2 0 9 1 6 9 7 ° 8 6 2 4 9 8 1 4 7 1 5 2 0 1 0 4 5 2 3 2 1 1 9 3 1 0 6 2 5 1 6 2 4 1 2 1 0 3 ° OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard D. Andrews, Interim Director SCALE 1:750 000 0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES 0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS OPEN-FILE REPORT OF3-2015 Preliminary Fault Map of Oklahoma PRELIMINARY FAULT MAP OF OKLAHOMA By Austin A. Holland April 21, 2015 Inset Map showing all faults used to compile the preliminary fault map. 3,418 fault segments from industry contributions and more than 6,000 fault segments from the published literature were used. The complicated representation for some major faults is due to the large number of maps showing the same faults with each map showing a different location. Additionally, fault intricacy may represent true fault complexity. Summary This preliminary fault map is compiled from oil and gas industry data and published literature. Most of the faults from the published literature are documented in the supplement to this Open-File Report. This map is compiled from the Oklahoma fault database, which continues to be updated as additional fault information is available. This map is being released in a timely manner and should be considered preliminary. The faults shown here represent one interpretation of all the faults in the Oklahoma fault database being compiled by the . This preliminary version identifies surface and subsurface faults on one map. OGS Interpretation and Compilation Methods This fault map does not show additional information associated with the fault database such as the formation the fault was mapped in, method used to constrain fault location, etc. Faults mapped at the surface were given highest precedence and most were included on this map. Fault segments that are mapped close to each other are interpreted as a single fault. Faults mapped using 3D seismic were given precedence over faults constrained from 2D seismic data, and subsurface faults not constrained by seismic data were given the lowest precedence. True fault complexity in some areas may be misrepresented by this effort of producing single fault locations for mapped faults. In areas with complex faults, individual fault locations are uncertain and may be in error by as much as several kilometers. Some questionable faults and small parallel faults are omitted. Future efforts will document the choices made in developing a final fault map of Oklahoma. 3,418 fault segments from industry contributions and more than 6,000 fault segments from the published literature were used to make this map. All these fault segments are shown on Inset Map and give an indication of where faulting is most complex. Future efforts will make more metadata available and will include such information as the fault slip-sense and dip direction. Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association for its leadership efforts in making the fault database contributions from industry possible. In addition, I would like to thank all those who have worked and continue to work on the Oklahoma Fault Database including Stephen Marsh, Stephen Holloway, Dr. Randy Keller, Russell Standridge, Amberlee Darold, and Jacob Hernandez. This work was partially funded by Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America project number 12122-91. Open-file Report Disclaimer Open-File Reports are used for the dissemination of information that fills a public need and are intended to make the results of research available at the earliest possible date. Because of their nature and possibility of being superseded, an Open-File Report is intended as a preliminary report not as a final publication. Analyses presented in this article are based on information available to the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Oklahoma Geological Survey, the University of Oklahoma, their employees, or the State of Oklahoma. The accuracy of the information contained herein is not guaranteed and any mention of trade names are not an endorsement by the author, the Oklahoma Geological Survey, or the University of Oklahoma.
Transcript
Page 1: OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - University of Oklahomawichita.ogs.ou.edu/documents/OF3-2015/OF3-2015.pdf · OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard D. Andrews, Interim Director SCALE 1:750

6N

5

4

3

2

1N

21

26W 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1W 1E 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26E

C I M A R R O NT E X A S B E A V E R

H A R P E R W O O D S

W O O D W A R D

E L L I S

R O G E R M I L L S

D E W E Y

C U S T E R

B E C K H A M W A S H I T A

G R E E R

H A R M O N

J A C K S O N

K I O W A

T I L L M A N

C O T T O N

C O M A N C H E

S T E P H E N S

J E F F E R S O N

L O V E

C A R T E R

M A R S H A L L

J O H N S T O N

A T O K A

B R Y A N

C H O C T A W

P U S H M A T A H A

M C C U R T A I N

L E F L O R E

L A T I M E RP I T T S B U R G

C O A L

P O N T O T O C

M U R R A Y

G A R V I N

C A D D O

G R A D Y

C A N A D I A N

B L A I N E

K I N G F I S H E R

M A J O R

A L F A L F A

G R A N T

G A R F I E L D

K A Y

N O B L E

O S A G E

P A W N E E

WA

SH

IN

GT

ON

N O W A T AC R A I G

O T T A W A

D E L A W A R E

M A Y E S

A D A I R

C H E R O K E E

M U S K O G E E

S E Q U O Y A H

H A S K E L L

R O G E R S

T U L S A

W A G O N E R

O K M U L G E E

M C I N T O S H

H U G H E S

S E M I N O L E

O K F U S K E E

C R E E K

C L E V E L A N D

M C C L A I N

PO

TT

AW

AT

OM

IE

O K L A H O M A

L I N C O L N

L O G A N

P A Y N E

95°

96°97°

98°

34°

99°

35°

100°

36°

37°

103°

102°101°

7

15

16

17

21201918

1S

10S

9

8

6

5

4

3

2

262524232214131211

27E

1E

27

28

29N

28E

1E

29N

1N

1W8

19

8

2

1N

11

29N

35°

4

95°

16

17

9

18

23

2

10

14

6

13

22

14

5

17

5

2

4

16

8

11

18

16

7

617

11

19

11

10

9

100°

13

25

12

24

10

11

22

20

37°

4

18

525W 23

6

27

10

3

4

3

10

17

19

9

15

9

4

19

7

25

18

7

7

102°

14

2

3

16

23

6

22

25W

20

1E

8

19

26

8

3

8

3

10

5

22

21

23

3

18

17 28

1N

27

27

24

21

11

9

7

18

15

24E

23

14

36°

24

22

99°

16 5 217

23

6

96°

24

7

2

17

4

21

12

9

26

22

20

20

3

12

13

14

15

2

21

3

13 1W 4

5

12

34°

101°

6

19

7

98°

15

15

6

1S

14

5

26

7

4

28

11

25

5

26

12

15

2

2

22

18

20

12

13

21

13

13

20

9

16

97°

8

6

24 9

8

14

7

15

2010

4

5

23

21

19

3

10

6

25

16

2412

103°

OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEYRichard D. Andrews, Interim Director

SCALE 1:750 0000 10 20 30 40 50 MILES

0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS

OPEN-FILE REPORT OF3-2015Preliminary Fault Map of Oklahoma

PRELIMINARY FAULT MAP OF OKLAHOMA By

Austin A. HollandApril 21, 2015

Inset Map showing all faults used to compile the preliminary fault map. 3,418 fault segments from industry contributions and more than 6,000 fault segments from the published literature were used. The complicated representation for some major faults is due to the large number of maps showing the same faults with each map showing a different location. Additionally, fault intricacy may represent true fault complexity.

SummaryThis preliminary fault map is compiled from oil and gas industry data and published literature. Most of the faults from the published literature are documented in the supplement to this Open-File Report. This map is compiled from the Oklahoma fault database, which continues to be updated as additional fault information is available. This map is being released in a timely manner and should be considered preliminary. The faults shown here represent one interpretation of all the faults in the Oklahoma fault database being compiled by the . This preliminary version identifies surface and subsurface faults on one map.OGS

Interpretation and Compilation MethodsThis fault map does not show additional information associated with the fault database such as the formation the fault was mapped in, method used to constrain fault location, etc. Faults mapped at the surface were given highest precedence and most were included on this map. Fault segments that are mapped close to each other are interpreted as a single fault. Faults mapped using 3D seismic were given precedence over faults constrained from 2D seismic data, and subsurface faults not constrained by seismic data were given the lowest precedence.

True fault complexity in some areas may be misrepresented by this effort of producing single fault locations for mapped faults. In areas with complex faults, individual fault locations are uncertain and may be in error by as much as several kilometers. Some questionable faults and small parallel faults are omitted. Future efforts will document the choices made in developing a final fault map of Oklahoma.

3,418 fault segments from industry contributions and more than 6,000 fault segments from the published literature were used to make this map. All these fault segments are shown on Inset Map and give an indication of where faulting is most complex. Future efforts will make more metadata available and will include such information as the fault slip-sense and dip direction.

AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association for its leadership efforts in making the fault database contributions from industry possible. In addition, I would like to thank all those who have worked and continue to work on the Oklahoma Fault Database including Stephen Marsh, Stephen Holloway, Dr. Randy Keller, Russell Standridge, Amberlee Darold, and Jacob Hernandez. This work was partially funded by Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America project number 12122-91.

Open-file Report Disclaimer Open-File Reports are used for the dissemination of information that fills a public need and are intended to make the results of research available at the earliest possible date. Because of their nature and possibility of being superseded, an Open-File Report is intended as a preliminary report not as a final publication. Analyses presented in this article are based on information available to the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Oklahoma Geological Survey, the University of Oklahoma, their employees, or the State of Oklahoma. The accuracy of the information contained herein is not guaranteed and any mention of trade names are not an endorsement by the author, the Oklahoma Geological Survey, or the University of Oklahoma.

Recommended