+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 %...

Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 %...

Date post: 11-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
46
Old Threats- New perspectives Torun’s conference 02-06-2016
Transcript
Page 1: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old Threats- New perspectivesTorun’s conference 02-06-2016

Page 2: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old Threats-New persepectives

Cercospora

Page 3: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Phenotyping : scoring method

Page 4: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 5: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Observation trials: artificial inoculation

Page 6: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old problem,

modern approach

Page 7: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 8: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 9: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 10: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 11: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 12: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 13: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Chlorophyl fluorescens technique Old problem,

modern approach

Page 14: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old problem,

modern approach

Page 15: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

tolerance?

Page 16: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old problem,

modern approach

Page 17: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 18: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old problem,

modern approach

Page 19: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

New Breeding strategy:

“re-enginering” varieties for CLS resistance

• NBS-LRR genes (candidate genes)

• tolerance against cercosporin cell destruction

• Limit mycelium growth

• Reduce sporulation of cercospora

• Optimal canopy development (“ideotype”)

• Optimal leaf surface to reduce first infection steps

• Introduction of “exotic germplasm”

Page 20: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old Threats-New persepectives

Drought stress tolerance

Page 21: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• What is drought tolerance?

• Strategy of the plant (wilting, non-wilting..)-> what is

best?

• More drought tolerant varieties: # G x E

• > smaller relative yield loss under drought conditions

• Water Use Efficiency

page

21

Drought tolerance

Page 22: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• Leaf surface

• Trait (point = average of 10 plants)

• Trait ratio

0,6

0,8

1,0

1,2

1,4

1,6

1,8

2,0

2014-05-08 2014-05-13 2014-05-18 2014-05-23 2014-05-28 2014-06-02

17 days drought

Wilting

+

Fast recovering

Trait

=> Later wilting

1 day WATER

Drought stress

Page 23: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• Leaf area (day 14 of drought)

Drought stress

Page 24: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• Leaf area (day 17 of drought)

Drought stress

Page 25: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• Leaf area (day 1 after recovery)

Drought stress

Page 26: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Drought tolerance: classifying environments

Statistical analysis of our trial network allow to select

varieties performing better under dry conditions

Page 27: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Drought stress tolerance: our experience in Spain

Page 28: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Drought stress tolerance: our experience in Spain

Page 29: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Drought stress tolerance: our experience in Spain

Page 30: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 31: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

New Breeding strategy:

“re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress

• reduction 20 % water input resulted in

• loss of 19,2 t/ha,

• gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss of 1,8 t/ha sugar.

• SV variety SETENIL was the most W.U.E. variety in

this study (lowest sugar yield loss).

Page 32: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Drought stress tolerance:

our experience in Poland (index hybrids, COBORU trials)

Page 33: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

New Breeding strategy:

“re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress

• R.O.S. against leaf tissue destruction

• Optimal canopy development (“ideotype”)

• Optimal leaf surface to reduce leaf tissue destruction

• Introduction of “exotic germplasm”

Page 34: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Sun burn tolerance: Resistance to oxydative stress

Page 35: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Drought stress tolerance:

our experience in Poland (index hybrids, COBORU trials)

Page 36: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old problem,

modern approach

Page 37: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Old Threats-New persepectives

Storability

Page 38: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• Trend is to go for longer beet campaigns

• Sugar losses at beet storage Growing importance

STORABILITY

Page 39: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Influence of Temperature on Sugar Losses

page 39

IRBAB

Page 40: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 41: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

Important differences in Germplasm

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1.5-2.0 2.0-2.5 2.5-3.0 3.0-3.5 3.5-4.0 4.0-4.5 4.5-5.0 5.0-5.5

∆ 4% Sucrose

20% rel. loss

Page 42: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 43: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss
Page 44: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

page 44

Factors influencing sugar losses

Page 45: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

• SESVanderHave has a lot of trialdata due itsworldwide network

• Big genetic screening for good storablegenetics

• Good agricultural practices are most important

• Genetic influence only at last place

Conclusions

Page 46: Old Threats- New perspectives “re-enginering” varieties for Drought stress •reduction 20 % water input resulted in •loss of 19,2 t/ha, •gain of 1,4 % sugar, and finally loss

THANK YOU


Recommended