Omak School District…………
A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
1 | P a g e
Dear Dr. Swanson:
It is with a significant sense of accomplishment and pride that I present to you this summary report of
the work of the district’s Our Future – A Planning Committee outlining their long range facility plan
recommendations. Their collective response to your request and the challenge of the Board to provide
a comprehensive facility improvement plan with emphasis on equitable teaching and learning spaces for
all students was outstanding in every regard. Additionally, your encouragement and empowerment to
look to the future have produced a long range facility plan that will be a valuable resource for the
District for years to come.
Clearly, this has been a team effort – one that I am proud to say I was a member! While the final
product reflects the values and priorities of the Committee, it also reflects the voice of many members
of the Omak community through multiple surveys and community forums. Chairman Wayne Barrett
provided solid leadership throughout the process with technical assistance from several key resources
including Greg McCracken and John Wegener, BLRB Architects, and Jon Gores, D.A. Davidson.
Thank you for the opportunity to support your work in Omak and best wishes with your ongoing facility
planning efforts to accomplish the vision ……….. Creating a Future for Every Child.
Sincerely,
Michael C. Casey, K-12 Educational Consultant
Hill International
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
2 | P a g e
Long Range Facility Plan – Summary Report
Table of Contents
I. Introduction & Background………………………………………………………………………………. 3
II. Board Charge to the Committee……………………………………………………………………….. 5
III. Committee Membership, Organization, and Timeline………………………………………… 7
IV. Summary of the Work ………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
A. Committee Vision Statement …………………………………………………………………… 11
B. Educational Standards ……………………………………………………………………………… 13
C. Identification of Major Facility Improvement Needs ………………………………… 17
OSPI Study & Survey – Inventory of Facilities & Existing Conditions
School Profiles
D. District Maintenance Issues …………………………………………………………………… 21
E. Data Collection ………………………………………………………………………………………. 23
Student Enrollment
Demographic Data
Housing & Growth Projections
F. Funding Considerations …………………………………………………………………………… 25
OSPI Construction Assistance Eligibility
District Bond Debt Capacity
Funding Scenarios
G. Community / School Priorities & Values ………………………………………………… 27
H. Committee Recommendations ……………………………………………………………… 29
Facility Improvement Components
Phasing Recommendation & Timeline
Phase I – Capital Bonding Recommendation
o Project – Omak Middle School
Description
Programming & Space Allocation
o Bond Amount
o Election Date
V. Committee Chair’s Message ……………………………………………………………………………. 32
VI. Appendices ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33
3 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section I Introduction and Background
This section provides a brief description of the chronology of events surrounding
Omak School District’s facility planning interest and key conditions central to a
successful facility improvement plan as well as local priorities.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
4 | P a g e
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
In the fall of 2014 a meeting was requested by Dr. Swanson, Supt., to begin discussions regarding the
development of a comprehensive facility improvement plan for the Omak School District. While the
most obvious pressing need was a new middle school, Dr. Swanson preferred to approach the issue of
facility improvement from a total district wide perspective, engage community participation and
feedback throughout the process, with an outcome that would provide direction for years to come. A
participatory and transparent process outlined by representatives of Hill International aligned with Dr.
Swanson’s vision for developing a plan. It was decided to use the balance of the current school year to
do initial preparations with a community based committee beginning their work September 2015.
With the assistance of various resources preliminary plans moved forward to determine possible facility
improvement options available to the District. Fortunately, initial inquiry concerning facility
improvement support was favorable which yielded the following:
Eligible for Study & Survey grant from OSPI
Eligible for state match construction assistance – K-8 only
Voted bond debt capacity available – but limited
Following an early winter board presentation of the proposed long range facility plan process, the Board
of Directors asked Dr. Swanson to assemble representatives from the community and staff to respond to
the Board’s Facility Master Plan – Charge to the Committee, consistent with Board Policy #6900. Key
elements within the charge include:
Thoughtful direction for current and future planning
Identification of major maintenance projects
Consideration of changing demographics as well as instructional and curricular changes
Membership is to reflect a cross-section of the community and staff
The process is to transparent, participatory and communicates the work in a timely
manner
On September 9, 2015 Wayne Barrett, Chair, opened the first meeting of the District’s facility planning
committee titled – Our Future – A Planning Committee. He was joined by Mike Casey, Hill International,
and Greg McCracken, BLRB Architects, who provided technical assistance throughout the process.
Following over a year of study, analysis, feedback, and consensus building the Committee finalized its
recommendations on September 14, 2016. The comprehensive long range facility plan was presented to
the Board of Directors on September 27, 2016.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
5 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section II Board Charge to the Committee
Prior to constituting a citizens’ based facility planning committee the Omak
Board of Directors approved a Charge to the Committee consistent with Board
Policy #6900. Reflected in the Charge is the Board’s interest to have a
comprehensive plan that will extend for ten to twenty-five years. The plan was
to specify specific projects, a timeline for those projects, initial cost estimates,
and funding options.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
6 | P a g e
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
Charge to the Committee
Consistent with Board Policy # 6900 – Management Support / Facility Planning, this committee is
charged with the development of a district wide Facilities Master Plan (Plan), also known as a Long
Range Facility Plan. The Plan is a document which defines thoughtful direction for buildings, grounds,
and undeveloped properties of the District. The Plan will provide recommended direction for future
decisions such as renovation, construction, demolition and sale of buildings or decisions specific to
district property. Major maintenance projects should also be identified. Development of the Plan
should focus on anticipated topics and issues that are broader than facility concerns alone. These
include demographic changes, rapidly changing instructional and curricular needs, and general
education requirements based upon the vision of the District.
The Plan is to specify recommended projects, the timing and sequencing of the projects, their estimated
costs and funding source(s). The Plan should extend for a minimum of ten years to a maximum of
twenty-five years with scheduled updates every three to five years. Past district Facility Master Plans
will be used as a reference.
The committee is to be comprised of a cross-section of school personnel, parents and community
members. Opportunity for municipal agencies and civic organizations to be represented on the
committee is encouraged. The committee will develop, utilize and implement a planning process that is
transparent, participatory and communicates effectively in a timely manner to all community members
and district staff. The committee is to meet monthly throughout the 2015 -16 School Year. It is to
provide opportunity for public input which will be considered in generating the final Facilities Master
Plan. The committee shall hold its first meeting in September, 2015 and is to present its final report and
recommendation to the Omak School District Board of Directors prior to July 2016.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
7 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section III Committee Membership, Organization, and Timeline
This section includes committee membership, committee leadership, consultant
support, and a master schedule outlining the process.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
8 | P a g e
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP, ORGANIZATION, & TIMELINE
Committee Membership
Wayne Barrett, Chair Jordan Sackman Guin Joyce
Kathy Miller Don Pearce Ann Talbot
Chris Miller Cathy MacDonald Kathie Brown
Katy Christoph David Kirk T. Lewis
Dennis Carlton Scott Haeberle Lauren Miller
Ralph Malone Ryan Christoph Jack Schneider
Erik Swanson Michael Porter Sheila Crowder
Tim Engh Stacy McClellan Sheila Corson
Chris Blackman Joseph LaGrou Nancy McClellan
Gary Tonasket Summer Olson Tracie Tonasket
Teresa Medina
Organization
Planning Team Membership
District Erik Swanson, Supt. Wayne Barrett, Chair
Scott Haeberle, Fiscal
Consultants Greg McCracken, BLRB John Wegener, BLRB
Mike Casey, Hill Intl.
Committee Meetings – Eleven monthly committee meetings were held September 2015 through
September 2016. See district master file for agendas and minutes for each committee meeting.
Facility Tours – Committee members toured all district buildings, grounds, and property.
Community Input – Several Thought Exchange surveys focusing on facility improvement issues
were conducted during the long range facility planning process and two community forums were
conducted.
Board Presentations –
Monthly Board Updates Throughout
Interim Board Update – June 23, 2016
Board Work Study Session – September 21, 2016
Final Board Presentation – September 27, 2016
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
9 | P a g e
Timeline
Refer to Appendices for master schedule of timeline and activities. This master schedule was
prepared consistent with the Board’s Charge to the Committee completion date. However, a delay
associated with property inquiries resulted in an agreed upon completion date of September 2016.
10 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV Summary Report
The following components of the Executive Summary reflect key long range
facility planning topics and products reviewed and developed by the Committee.
Additional material presented to and reviewed (e.g. meeting agendas and
minutes) by the Committee can be found in the complete file located in the
superintendent’s office.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
11 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. A Facility Planning Vision Statement
The Committee’s Facility Planning Vision Statement reflects the priorities and
values held by members of the Committee as well as those perceived to be
important to the Omak community at large. The Committee went through a
process of development, refinement, and final approval. It has been used as an
important reference when evaluating a number of recommendations to ensure
alignment and consistency.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
12 | P a g e
FACILITY PLANNING VISION STATEMENT – 2016
Current District Guiding References
Vision Success Through Aligned, Intentional, and Meaningful Programs
2015-17 Board Goal #1 Project and prepare for future facility needs including
successfully funding changes and specific facilities plans
Facility Planning Committee Vision Statement – Our Future
For the past 104 years skilled educators and staff have dedicated their time, energy, and talents
to deliver to Omak’s youth a quality educational program. In response to those efforts over time, the
citizens of Omak have given generously to support all aspects of the educational program, and in
particular the District’s facilities. Through the years those facilities have been modernized, expanded,
and built new to address perceived student needs. It is the desire of this committee – Our Future – to
address current facility needs as well as plan for the future, and to do so with these guiding values:
All students will have a common school/grade experience;
Safety and security issues are of the highest priority;
Improvement efforts are developed in a manner that is both fiscally responsible
and cost effective given the best information available at the time;
To the degree possible, all schools will provide equitable educational spaces that
support the ability to adapt to changing instructional needs;
Because Omak Schools belong to the community they will be designed and
operated in a warm and welcoming manner for students, staff, and visitors as
well as accessibility to specialized areas of interest to the community; and,
While schools must be sustainable over time, proactive planning for
modernization, expansion, or replacement is to be proactive and ongoing.
With these values as a guide, the Committee visualizes implementing a plan that, over time, will
influence district facilities by becoming more common in quality and efficiency, mitigating outstanding
major maintenance issues, addressing current safety and security concerns, and planning for the future.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
13 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. B Educational Standards
Educational facility design is influenced by a number of important factors,
among them the kinds and number of spaces required to support the
educational program. Specific district influences such as adopted curricula,
school size, classroom size, special programs, and scheduling are key.
Additionally, district and community values have a major influence as well. The
accompanying Construction and Organization Standards is the first document
for the district and as such, will likely be further developed.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
14 | P a g e
OMAK SCHOOL DISTRICT – SCHOOL FACILITY CONSTRUCTION AND ORGANIZATION STANDARDS
Grade Configuration – The District believes the organization of grade levels is best influenced by the
number of transitions between schools – the fewer the better
Recommended Organization
Elementary Grades Preschool – 4th or 5th
Middle School Grades 5th - 8th or 6th – 8th
High School Grades 9th – 12th
School Size
Recommended Standard
At elementary level, school size to accommodate grade level
teams of 5 to 6 teams.
Design options to address potential growth should not exceed
school size beyond 500 students.
School Site
Recommended Standard
Location
Acreage
Elementary – 5 acres, plus one additional acre per 100 students
Secondary – 10 acres, plus one additional acre per 100 students
Note – State now emphasizes that school sites will be of
sufficient size to provide for the health & safety of the school
enrollment as well educational program needs.
Playground & Sports Fields (Including OMS)
Parking for Staff & Visitors
Class Size Targets – To the degree possible given program decisions, facility limitations, staffing
availability, and financial resources district learning spaces should be designed for the following targets:
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
15 | P a g e
Recommended Standard –
Grade Size
Pre - Kindergarten 17
K – 3rd 17
4th – 5th 23
6th – 12th 25
Middle School SPED 15
High School SPED 15
Note – Initiative 1351 Washington Class Size Reduction Initiative recommended:
Kindergarten – 3rd Grade No More Than 15 -17 Students
4th – 12th Grade No More Than 22 – 25 Students
Program Space – Classroom size and school size program space calculations vary depending on program
requirements. Student classroom space and school capacity will be guided by the following:
Recommended Standard –
Student Classroom Spaces Minimum of 960 Sq. Ft.
Special Program Spaces Program Specific
HS Music to PAC Life Skills Rooms
Separate OMS Music Program (Kitchen & Shower)
Auxiliary Special Services Auxiliary Learning Spaces
MS CTE Program (Electives/Shop)
Preschool Components
Sufficient Classrooms to Accommodate Class Configuration
Based on Age
Separate Kitchen & Cafeteria
Life Skills Center
Divided Playground Spaces
Pre, 1-2, 3-5
Gym
Auxiliary Areas
Recommended Minimum
Cafeteria Common Areas
Performance Multiple Use
Community Use Storage
Gymnasium Locker Rooms (Age Appropriate)
Full Kitchen/Modernize/All Schools
16 | P a g e
Health, Safety & Security
Recommended Standard
Entrance Visibility Exterior Access Control
Communication Interior Access Control
VOIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol)
Sufficient Water & Restrooms Stations
Locker Rooms
Secure Lockers & Showers
Laboratories
Recommended Standard – Alignment with current curriculum.
Technology
Recommended Standard – Refer to district plan.
Pedestrian & Vehicular Traffic
Recommended Standard
Separation of bus, pickup, and pedestrian traffic.
Facility Replacement
Recommended Standard
Modernization vs. Replacement – 80% Rule
Approved 2-10-16
17 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. C Identification of Major Facility Improvement Needs
This section contains a summary of two facility evaluation perspectives. The
first is a summary of the work completed by BLRB Architects contracted to
complete a formal evaluation using the Office of Superintendent Public
Instruction (OSPI) Inventory and Condition of Schools (ICOS). The complete
Study &Survey can be found in the superintendent’s office for review. Second, a
set of school profiles for each of the four schools prepared by each principal
from a user perspective.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
18 | P a g e
IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR FACILITY IMPROVEMENT NEEDS
OSPI Study & Survey – Inventory of Facilities & Existing Conditions
Omak High School
Square Footage Built
Building A 78,326 SF Original 1950, Bld. A 1978, Modernization 2009
Building B 29,730 SF 1950
CTE 23,812 SF 2009
Auto Shop 3,800 SF 1968
OSPI – Information & Condition of Schools – Assessment
Building A 85.46% Good Condition
Building B 86.74% Good Condition
CTE 98.74% Excellent Condition
Auto Shop 70.02% Fair Condition
Omak Middle School
Square Footage Built
Total Building 65,395 SF Original 1948, 1982 & 1988 Addition & Mod.
OSPI – Information & Condition of Schools – Assessment
63.36% Poor – Fair Condition
East Omak Elementary
Square Footage Built
Total Building 43,581 SF Original 1958, 1972 &1988 Addition & Mod.
OSPI – Information & Condition of Schools – Assessment
70.87% Fair Condition
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
19 | P a g e
North Omak Elementary
Square Footage Built
Total Building 48,769 SF Original 1970, 1988 Addition & Mod.
OSPI – Information & Condition of Schools – Assessment
74.19% Fair Condition
Additional Facilities
Non-Educational Facilities
District Office
Maintenance & Operations Building
Stadium – Concessions & Restrooms
School Profiles – Principals of each school facility were asked to prepare a school profile that included
school size, grade configuration, staffing and a list from a user’s perspective of the facility’s attributes
and challenges. Listed below are key challenges identified by each principal. See Appendices for full
report.
Omak High School – Prepared by David Kirk, Principal
Key Challenges
Shared space with middle school for all music programs
Seven (7) points of entry into building that are not supervised / secure
B-Wing was not remodeled in 2007 – needs general improvements
Omak Middle School – Prepared by Kathy Miller, Principal
Key Challenges
Small gym with poor locker room and restroom facilities
Lack of sufficient office space requires shared spaces
No space for culinary or shop programs
Life Skill programs do not have adequate facilities for program needs
Insufficient conference space and limited storage
Student lockers are old and poor quality
Hallways are too narrow
PE classes get bumped by High School programs
No playground space or music room
No common areas for students to gather
Sound system does not reach all areas of building
Entry area is not safe from intruders and no surveillance equipment
20 | P a g e
East Omak Elementary – Prepared by Ryan Christoph, Principal
Key Challenges
Building is well maintained but aging requiring more attention
Carpeting needs replacing
Proper ventilation is a concern
Insufficient parking and proximity to highway is a concern
Reoccurring water damage due to pipers rupturing
Hallways are too small for student population
North Omak Elementary – Prepared by Jack Schneider, Principal
Key Challenges
Limited gym space combined with large classes and multiple use
of gym prohibits kindergarteners from receiving PE
Portables #1, 2, and 3 need to be replaced and relocated in a
more visible area
Covered play area would provide additional options for poor
weather days
New testing requirements suggest a need for greater grade
level intercommunications in a grade 1st to 5th building
21 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. D District Maintenance Issues
District staff have compiled a list of prioritized deferred maintenance issues for
facilities district wide. The accompanying list will be reviewed annually by
district officials to identify priority projects that can be funded with general fund
resources and those requiring alternative funding support.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
22 | P a g e
MAINTENANCE ISSUES AND TIMELINE
Maintenance Location Est. Start
Urgent Items (Due to age or safety)
Telephone System District Wide
Door Locks & Key Systems District Wide
Intercom Systems Middle & East Schools
CCTV Systems District Wide
Fire Alarm Controls Middle & East Schools
Limited Security Controls District Wide
Poor Parking Lot Lighting District Wide
Administration Building
Maintenance Shop
Football Field Lighting High School
Parking Lot Asphalt Replacement District Wide
Storage District Wide
HVAC Controls & Equipment District wide
Football Bleachers High School
Camp D road / updates Camp D 4/1/16
Pending Items
Carpet / Flooring Replacement District Wide
Lift Station East School
Sidewalk Replacement District Wide – Middle School
Roof Replacement Maintenance Shop
Preventative Items / Budgetary
Carpet / Flooring Budgetary Scheduled Summers/budget
Lift Station 2016 Summer Schedule
Air Quality Filter Changes & Monthly
Maintenance Schedules
Door Hardware Budgetary work Order Process
Fence Repair & Updates Budget Yearly Yearly Budget
Parking Lot Asphalt Sealing & Replacement Budgeted & Scheduled Summer/2016
23 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. E Data Collection
During the course of the facility planning process members of the Committee
were provided information useful in forecasting future facility needs by looking
at projected student enrollment, population demographic changes, and housing
and economic indicators related to forecasting future student growth. It
appears after review and discussion short term, a conservative facility growth
estimate would be accurate.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
24 | P a g e
DATA COLLECTION
Student Enrollment – Chapter 3 of the Study & Survey, completed by BLRB Architects, provides a
forecast for future student enrollment based on recent enrollment figures projecting these out for the
next six years. Using recent and current cohort data for the next six years only a “slight” increase is
anticipated. The Committee has determined for middle school planning purposes school size should be
in the 400 student range allowing for some future growth. Future modifications to existing elementary
schools will also reflect a conservative growth estimate.
Demographic – Drawing from Chapter 3 of the Study & Survey, completed by BLRB Architects, it
interesting to note that while overall student enrollment forecast represents only a “slight” increase
over the next six years, according to the 2010 Census, there has been a rather significant decline in
population for ages 5 to 17 years – 19.08%. The most significant change in population by race includes
Black or African American – an increase of 237.50%.
Housing and Economic Growth Projections – Efforts to contact key community individuals familiar with
housing and economic growth for the Omak area were met with limited response. However, thanks to
several individuals a number of informative perspectives were obtained. Listed below are perceptions
and observations shared by individuals associated with city government, economic development
support, and home financing all suggesting a potential for limited future growth.
Future retail business growth appears to be focused in north Omak.
Considerable opportunity for retail expansion.
Motel & hotel revenues have increased but Canadians tend to spend extended
time farther north.
In recent past the housing inventory was fairly well consumed by retired people
looking for reasonable housing costs.
Prior year only one housing start was recorded.
Housing parcels are available within the urban growth area.
Recent low income housing project added 40 units but there remains a shortage
of rental housing.
Overall, based on the above data and community awareness the Committee did not incorporate a
significant growth factor for any of the facility components for the duration of the proposed long range
facility plan.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
25 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. F Funding Considerations
While the Charge to the Committee was not to develop a specific bond amount
proposal, the Charge did request estimated costs and funding sources. With the
assistance and expertise of Jon Gores, D A Davidson, the Committee was
presented key financial information necessary to establish the District’s ability
to raise funds for school construction. Additionally, BLRB Architects, working
with OSPI were able to estimate the Districts School Construction Assistance
(State Match) eligibility. Based on preliminary cost estimates provided by BLRB,
the Committee was able to develop a Phase I bond proposal. This section
contains a summary of this information.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
26 | P a g e
FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS
State Funding Assistance Estimates – Determination of preliminary estimates for state funding
assistance was achieved through the efforts of BLRB Architects and John Heinley, OSPI Eastern Regional
Coordinator. These estimates are based on the District’s current 73.12% State Matching Ratio. For
planning purposes the Committee used the below estimates.
Omak Middle School $7,700,000
East Omak Elementary $5,600,000
North Omak Elementary $5,500,000
Omak High School Currently Not Eligible
Bond Debt Capacity – Washington State schools are limited to a total bond debt capacity of 5% of the
district’s assessed valuation. Based on Omak School District’s assessed valuation as of September 1,
2015 and outstanding bonds, the District’s voted debt capacity is $25,234,369. See Appendices for DA
Davidson Debt Capacity Analysis.
Bond Funding Scenarios – Given initial cost estimates for a new middle school that exceed the District’s
current bond debt capacity, Jon Gores, DA Davidson, provided several scenarios in the $26 Million to
$30 Million range for the Committee to review. These options provided a means for the District to
obtain sufficient funding to meet estimated costs thus allowing the Committee to move forward with a
new middle school recommendation. See Appendices for Scenario #6.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
27 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. G Community / School Priorities & Values
Within the Board’s Charge to the Committee was language emphasizing the
importance of community participation and input. Throughout the process all
meeting agendas and minutes were posted and available to interested parties.
Additionally, the District contracted with Thought Exchange, an online survey
program, to conduct a community wide exchange of ideas on a number of key
district topics of interest, including facility planning. Also, two community
forums were conducted to seek further community input regarding specific
aspects of the planning process.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
28 | P a g e
COMMUNITY / SCHOOL PRIORITIES & VALUES
Thought Exchange Facility Improvement Response – Thought Exchange survey results relative to facility
improvement issues was shared with the Committee in early January. A brief review of the data
identified the following priorities and values –
Building Renovation & Improvements Highest Priority
Grade Configuration Options / Modifications Cost Concerns
General Feedback Middle School Environment
Academic Success & Facilities
Are a Higher Priority Than Athletics
Facility Infrastructure
Renovate / Replace #1 Replace Middle School
#2 Replace MS & East Elem.
Athletic Facilities Support Investing
Concern for Location
Following this review members of the Committee were asked to identify their four priorities from which
the highest two priorities were identified - #1 – replace Omak Middle School & #2 replace East Omak
Elementary.
Community Forum #1 – The first community meeting provided a general overview of the process and
progress the Committee had made over the past few months. Three middle school scenarios were
presented to those in attendance for their feedback which was recorded on charts for display. Members
of the audience were then asked to identify their top 5 priorities and/or those statements with which
they most agreed. Listed below are the four top responses –
Of the three scenarios reviewed members of the audience preferred a middle
school location other than on the current property or the use of the District’s 10
acre parcel.
Potential property adjacent to North Omak Elementary was of high interest.
Concern for impacting adjacent neighborhood with evening activities and
pedestrian concerns were expressed over the potential location of a school on
the 10 acre parcel.
Concern for ongoing safety issues on the athletic fields the district uses.
Community Forum #2 – The second community forum focused on committee progress, property
interests, and next steps in completing the long range facility plan. A number of comments were shared
in support of the work of the Committee and appreciation for sharing in detail this work. In a group
response those in attendance gave a strong level of support for the District’s interest and inquiry into
properties adjacent to North Omak Elementary.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
29 | P a g e
SECTION CONTENTS
Section IV. H Committee Recommendations
Utilizing the various forms of information brought before the Committee for
review and consideration, the Committee developed a comprehensive list of
facility improvements. These components were then prioritized given public
input and financial parameters to form a phasing approach over time. Phase I
(replacement of the middle school) required more specific detail including
programming and space allocation definition, cost estimates, bond package
scenarios, and an election timeline.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
30 | P a g e
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Improvement Components – Members of the Committee identified the following facility
improvement components to be of the highest priority given the current information available.
Property Acquisition – Recommend additional property for a proposed new middle school.
Initial district investigation has focused on property adjacent to North Omak Elementary which would
encourage further development of a centralized campus. Additional properties are also encouraged to
be reviewed. Detailed information can be found in the Study & Survey – Chapter 8.
New Middle School – Recommend building a new middle school to accommodate 400 students
in grades 6th through 8th, location to be determined but first priority is property adjacent to North Omak
Elementary. Initial design shows the school to be around 77,000 square feet to accommodate district
program interests. Detailed information is contained within the Study & Survey – Chapters 7 & 8.
Middle School Re-Use – Committee values support responsible re-use of the 1988 wing of the
existing middle school that include several possibilities – maintain Stevens gym as an auxiliary gym for
the High School, dedicated space for PAC support, and district administrative office space. Detailed
information is contained within the Study & Survey – Chapters 7 & 8. An example of site utilization is
located in Chapter 2.
Athletic Field Improvements – Recommend a new athletic complex that includes an 8-lane all-
weather track, football/soccer fields, varsity baseball field, two softball fields and sufficient parking,
ideally located on property adjacent to the new middle school complex. Detailed information is
contained within the Study & Survey – Chapter 8.
Elementary School Improvements – Recommend further consideration for a potential K-5
campus at North Omak Elementary. Depending on future district circumstances and priorities, specific
modernization and additions have been identified for both East Omak elementary and North Omak
Elementary. Detailed information is contained within the Study & Survey – Chapters 7 & 8. An example
of site utilization is located in Chapter 2.
Early Childhood Learning Center – Recommend an 8,000 SF to 12, 000 SF early learning center to
be located adjacent to North Omak Elementary. Detailed information is contained within the Study &
Survey – Chapters 7 & 8. An example of site utilization is located in Chapter 2.
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
31 | P a g e
Auxiliary Gym – Recommend a future auxiliary gym to replace the aging Stevens Gymnasium.
Detailed information is contained within the Study & Survey – Chapter 8.
Omak High School Facility Improvements – A number of facility improvements were identified
and reviewed by the Committee. They include – music/performing arts, kitchen upgrades, culinary arts
program, science lab, auto shop, CTE program expansion, and B-Wing. Due to funding availability at a
later date these items were rated as a lower priority and therefore costs and scope of programs were
not finalized but should be part of ongoing long range facility planning.
District Wide Improvements – In addition to the potential re-use of the middle school for district
administrative offices the Committee acknowledged the need for a district warehouse. As a low priority
cost and scope were not finalized but should be part of ongoing long range facility planning.
Phasing Recommendation & Timeline – Consistent with the Board’s Charge to the Committee the above
referenced facility improvement components have been prioritized and sequenced over time to develop
a multi-year plan – a long range facility plan. This plan proposes facility improvements for the next
twenty-one (21) years. Factors influencing this timeline include perceived needs and priorities, the
district’s bond debt capacity limits, State Match eligibility, and Study & Survey eligibility. See
Appendices for BLRB’s Long Range Facility Plan Timeline.
Phase I Capital Bond Recommendation – New Middle School
Project – New Omak Middle School
Description – the new middle school concept will be a two story structure designed to
support a student enrollment of 400 students to be located on a different site than the current middle
school location. Currently, the District is negotiating with property owners adjacent to North Omak
Elementary as this site has been identified as a preferred location. See Appendices for property
locations.
Programming & Space Allocation – Based on conversations with staff and district
officials, preliminary programming and space allocation determinations were established to provide a
baseline from which to develop the middle school’s necessary size and scope. See Appendices for
programming and space allocation materials.
Bond Amount – Given preliminary cost estimates and budget assumptions along with
initial State Match eligibility estimate, a local bond amount in the neighborhood of $30,000,000 will be
necessary to fund this recommendation. See Appendices for BLRB’s Scenario for Planning and Budget
Assumptions.
Election Date – A bond measure put before the community as early as February or April
2017 would be ideal.
32 | P a g e
COMMITTEE CHAIR’S MESSAGE
September 21, 2016
Omak School District’s first ever long range facility plan containing district wide recommendations for
years to come is a result of months of effort by a dedicated group of stakeholders serving on the
facilities planning committee titled, Our Future – A Planning Committee , along with technical
assistance. The Committee embraced the Board of Directors – Charge to the Committee – working over
a period of thirteen months. The Committee became aware of current and pending facility
improvement needs and limitations, staff input as to the adequacy of each building in supporting the
instructional program, projected enrollment and housing estimates, along with a host of other relevant
information. The final product reflects recommendations aligned with Board priorities, community
values, committee vision, best practices, best information available at the time, as well as maximizing
potential State Match Assistance for Phase I – a new middle school.
While past school boards, prior administrations, and maintenance staff have done a commendable job
of monitoring and addressing many facility issues within available resources, this plan provides the basis
from which the District may take consistent steps in ensuring equitable educational facilities for all
students as well as building facilities that will support contemporary instructional and educational
demands. I trust the work of all those who participated in the process will be valued by influencing
facility decisions for the near future and years to come.
To those that so generously gave of their time and expertise along with our planning team members –
job well done!
Wayne Barrett
Committee Chair
Our Future – A Planning Committee
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
33 | P a g e
APPENDICES
Page
Master Schedule ………………………………………………………………………………… 34
School Profiles ……………………………………………………………………………………. 37
Omak High School
Omak Middle School
North Omak Elementary School
East Omak Elementary School
Omak School District Bond Debt Capacity Analysis ……………………………… 47
Omak School District Tax Impact Analysis for Scenario #6 ………………….. 48
Long Range Facilities Planning Timeline …………………………………………………. 50
New Middle School Site Options Adjacent to North Omak Elementary……. 51
New Middle School Programming & Space Allocation ……………………………… 52
New Middle School Planning & Cost Assumptions ……………………………….. 58
New Middle School Planning & Budget Assumptions ………………………………. 60
Omak School District………… A Commitment to Excellence Since 1912
Creating a Future for Every Child
Our Future – A Planning Committee
34 | P a g e
Facility Planning Services – Components & Schedule
March – September 2015
35 | P a g e
Facility Planning Services – Components & Schedule
October 2015 – March 2016
36 | P a g e
Facility Planning Services – Components & Schedule
April – October 2016
37 | P a g e
Producing Life Long Learners and Active Citizens
Long Range Facility Planning – School Profile Retrieval Sheet
Omak High School – Grades 9-12
Building Background
Original Construction Date - ??
Subsequent Additions & Remodeling - Remodel completed the fall of 2007
School Site – Three buildings, one location 20 South Cedar Street, Omak WA 98841 (A&B Wing,
CTE Building, Auto Shop)
Major Facility Improvements Needing Attention
Design Capacity / Teaching Stations – 41 classroom/ Teaching locations (including CTE and Gym)
Community Utilization – Several spaces partnered during the day (GEAR UP, College Bound) and
beyond the day (Welding – WVC, Library - Civil Air Patrol)
Staff and Instructional Organization
Certificated Staff
1 Principal (1.0 FTE)
1 Assistant Principal (1.0 FTE)
1 CTE Director/ Alternative Principal (0.5 FTE)
1 Athletic Director (0.5 FTE)
26 Regular Classroom Teachers (including Highlands High School)
9 Instructional Supports (JOM, ELL, Special Education)
6 Specialized Programs (Student Assistance Specialist, Psychologist, Counselor, Nurses,
GEAR UP)
8 Secretarial Support (including Highlands)
Student Demographics:
May 2015 data (P-223 report)
9th grade – 103
10th grade – 101
11th grade – 96
12th grade – 62 (graduated)
October 2013 data (OSPI Report Card)
49.1% Male, 50.9% Female
Hispanic: 21%
Native American: 28.4%
Caucasian: 44.2%
Two or more Races: 6.4%
Free or Reduced Meals: 56.7%
Special Education: 15.3%
Bilingual/ Migrant: 3.1%
Section 504: 2.8%
38 | P a g e
Student Transfers
IN from Other School Districts
OUT to Other School Districts
Facility / Program Overview
Attributes
Shared access to the Performing Arts Center
Largest Gym in the league – part of the 2007 remodel
All educational rooms equipped with document camera, LCD projector with Chromecast
2015-2016 school year, student will each have an individual Chromebook (1:1 technology to
student ratio)
Student Commons – based on remodel request.
Two student use computer labs
Career Center
Library staffed with secretary
Dedicated office space for administration and secretarial support
Dedicated classrooms for Special Education and Life Skills classes, with full lab
Adequate parking for students, staff and community.
The overall space is clean and well maintained by maintenance team
Challenges
Shared space with middle school for all music programs
Seven point of entry into building that are not supervised – security issues
B-wing was not remodeled in 2007 – needs general improvement
Committee Notes
39 | P a g e
Producing Life Long Learners and Active Citizens
Long Range Facility Planning – School Profile Retrieval Sheet
Omak Middle School – Grades 6-8
Building Background
Original Construction Date
- 1928 Stevens Building constructed for use as the high school
- 1948 Emert Building constructed to house primary grades plus kindergarten
Subsequent Additions & Remodeling
- Stevens Gym added to Stevens Building in 1955 ($82,337)
- Fire on Feb. 7, 1970; left only Stevens Gym
- Remodeling of Emert Building in 1977 (used for grades 6-8)
- 1988-89 project included science and computer classrooms, a multipurpose lunchroom gym
and the PAC
School Site houses grades 6-8
Major Facility Improvements Needing Attention:
- More classroom spaces (at capacity at present)
- More office space (several people are sharing office space)
- Addition of a real playground
- A larger and more modernized gym with floor that is not warped and bleachers to
accommodate the crowds.
- Locker rooms that actually function. There is not a proper stall for going to the bathroom in
the present ones.
- Most lockers in gym do not work and cannot be fixed due to age.
- Hallways are too narrow for traffic.
- Security system is totally inadequate. Need cameras and such.
- Need an uncarpeted Commons area for students to gather.
- Need a sound system for emergency announcements.
- Bell system is antiquated.
- Heating/cooling system has been improved but still needs work.
- A conference room is needed for meetings.
- Sixth and seventh grade classrooms are currently separated by an accordion wall, causing a
problem with instruction due to noise interference.
- Counseling area needs a place for group sessions.
- We would like to offer home economics and wood shop as electives, but we do not have
classroom spaces set up for that.
Design Capacity / Teaching Stations
- 18 rooms used as classroom spaces (one being very tiny)
- Two computer labs for teaching
40 | P a g e
- Gym space
- Art room with tiny kiln room (needs to be enlarged and enhanced for safer facility)
- Library
Community Utilization
- Continual (rarely not shared with the community)
- PAC, dressing rooms, MPR, Stevens Gym and library are constantly used by the community
for plays, concerts, garage sales, community sports, health fairs, and so on.
-
Staff and Instructional Organization
Certificated Staff
1 - Principal
.5 - Assistant Principal
17.17 - Regular Classroom Teachers
3.83 - Specialized Programs (LAP Math 180, LAP Reading, ELL, Special Education)
1 – Counselor
Classified Staff
3.5 - Secretarial Support (Head Secretary, Attendance, Librarian, Registration)
Instructional Support
1 - Special Services Room
5 - Special Education paras (and other duties for a few)
2 - Read 180/Math 180 paras (not full time)
1 - ELL para (one period)
Grade Configuration / Enrollment / Demographics
Grade 6/7/8 English/Language Arts classes; range of 16 – 30; mixed ethnicity
Grade 6/7/8 Math classes ranging from basic math to Algebra; range of 16 – 30; mixed
ethnicity
Grade 6/7/8 Social Studies classes; range of 16 – 30; mixed ethnicity
Grade 6/7/8 Science classes; range of 16 – 30; mixed ethnicity
Grade 6/7/8 PE and elective classes; range of 16 – 30; mixed ethnicity
Grade 6/7/8 Academy classes; range of 15 – 20; mixed ethnicity
Free / Reduced is about 65%
Student Transfers
IN from Other School Districts – 98 total*/29 juvenile
OUT to Other School Districts - 88 total */ 30 due to juvenile
Some of these students withdrew to go to juvenile lock-up and then returned. The number
shows total, which includes some students who had to withdraw and reenter more than once.
Facility / Program Overview
Attributes
Full service food program with kitchen
Dedicated office for administration with small area for office staff
One staff restroom in office and one in staff lounge
Dedicated classroom space for special education learning resource rooms and lifeskills room
41 | P a g e
Two self-contained computer labs – one for technology class and one to be shared with other
classes on a sign up basis; one small lab for Math 180
All students have lockers
The Performing Arts Center is state of the art
There is an area for students who have discipline issues (ISS room).
Challenges
One very small gym with poor locker rooms and restrooms, inadequate seating for events, and
little storage space
Lack of office space causes need for some to share space
Staff lounge lacks cooking area
No space for doing woodshop or home economics, two requested electives
Lifeskills room and special education resource rooms lack kitchen facilities; lifeskills room is a
converted storage area.
Very little storage space
Tiny conference room
Lockers are very old and run down
PE class gets bumped from their class space for OHS blood drives, OHS music festivities and
other events.
Halls are very narrow and therefore crowded.
Science rooms lack lab space and updated equipment. These are very inadequate for middle
school curriculum needs.
No real playground for students at lunch and before school.
No Commons area for students to gather.
When weather is bad, students have to wait outside in an open area for buses. There is no
covered or enclosed area.
There is no music room at the middle school, so students must walk to the high school facility.
Little space for patrons to wait or stand.
The entry way is not safe from intruders.
The sound system does not reach all rooms.
The library is in need of a better design to allow learning centers.
There is no surveillance equipment.
Committee Notes
42 | P a g e
Producing Life Long Learners and Active Citizens
Long Range Facility Planning – School Profile Retrieval Sheet
North Omak Elementary School – Grades Preschool, Kindergarten, 1st and 2nd
Building Background
Original Construction Date: 1988-90. Building burnt down in 1987.
Subsequent Additions & Remodeling
Added a two classroom portable in 2009
Office area re-carpeting and remodeling 2010
Interior painting 2012
Addition of new Portables 2013
New Gym Floor 2014
New Roof 2014
New Hallways and entrances flooring 2015
School Site
Consists of 3 pre-1987 portables, 1 2009 2-room portable; and 2 2014 2-room portables,
1 storage pod (10 x40), and a main building.
Major Facility Improvements Needing Attention
Carpeting, in all but the hallways, needs to be replaced.
Additional room may be needed for growing population and technology needs.
Outside trim needs to be painted and there is some fascia work needed.
More playground equipment would be helpful.
The school consists of 31 classrooms with bathrooms, 5 small instructional rooms, 8 offices, 4
SLP therapy rooms, 1 OT therapy room, a kindergarten common area, a large assembly area/preschool
gym, a gymnasium with a stage/music room and a kitchen for serving lunch attached as well as PE
storage and Food service storage rooms. There are 6 hallway restrooms, 3 janitor’s closets, a common
work room, a copy /storage room, 3 grade level supply rooms, 2 outside bathrooms, 3 play areas, a ¼
mile paved track and several pieces of playground equipment.
Community Utilization
North is used by many community groups in the evenings including sports, Special Olympics, weight
watchers, and by the after-school program.
‘
Staff and Instructional Organization
Certificated Staff 30
Classified Staff 45
Regular Classroom Teachers 23
43 | P a g e
Principal 1 (K-2) .5 (ECEAP)
Instructional Support- Music, P.E. (1 & 2), Library, Language development,
Computers (K)
Specialized Programs Resource Room, LAP, Migrant, Counselor, JOM
Secretarial Support 3
Grade Configuration / Enrollment / Demographics
Preschool: 6 classrooms Apx. 100 children & 40 co-op preschoolers.
Grade K: 8 classrooms 136 children (8/12)
Grade 1: 6 classrooms 147 children (8/12)
Grade 2: 6 classrooms 130 children (8/12)
Free / Reduced: 76%
Ethnicity
25% Hispanic
15 % Native American
10% mixed race
3% Pacific Islander, Black, Asian.
47% Caucasian
Student Transfers
IN from Other School Districts
OUT to Other School Districts
Facility / Program Overview
Attributes
1. Full Gym with storage and a stage used as a music room.
2. Food Service: Children come to the gym to pick up food and then take it to their classrooms
except for two classes in the portables who eat in the gym with their teacher supervising.
3. 2 computer labs, one for 1st and 2nd grades and I for kindergarten.
4. The kindergarten computer lab shares a room with Extreme Challenge, and Extreme challenge
occupies a third of our storage pod.
5. Unused, but good, furniture is stored in the courtyard under the eaves. It will not fit in the
pod.
6. Dedicated classroom spaces for LAP reading, the computer labs, Language Development,
Migrant/Resource Room, Sp.Ed life skills.
7. Small offices serve as offices or small therapy rooms for JOM, reading, speech, sign language,
blind/deaf support staff, early childhood services and school nurse.
8. Dedicated office space for a conference room, secretaries, counselor, and rooms that are
shared with OBHC, staff, and CPS.
9. We have good parking for daily use but not enough for events.
10. We have 2 small playgrounds for pre and K, and a large playground for all children.
11. Although our fire alarm system seems a bit sensitive, overall the air quality in the building is
excellent with the exception of the music room / stage which is improving with ventilation
cleanings.
44 | P a g e
12. We have a great roof and great entrance and hallway flooring and new concrete for our pre-
school portables.
Challenges
1. Our kindergarteners do not have P.E. because of the large classes in First and second grade
and the limited amount of time the gym can be used each day due to the fact that the gym is
also our serving area for all classes and the eating area for two classes on blustery days.
2. A second gym or a dedicated area for a cafeteria would be very helpful and would take the
pressure off the gym.
3. Portables 1, 2, and 3, are older than dirt and it would behoove us to replace them and
reconfigure their footprint so that the center preschool playground would be visible to law
enforcement. (This has been requested by the Omak PD.)
4. A covered play area on the big playground is on the staff’s wish list and would allow us to
play outside on very rainy days instead of having to be inside for movies and such. Rainy days
accounted for only two days last year, but usually we are in for about 14-18 days per year.
5. Once upon a time, there were plans for an early childhood center for Birth thru Kindergarten
to be built to the North of the school with North housing 1st – 3rd grade. But a EC center with a
1 to 5 building would seem more practical in light of the new testing atmosphere around the
country which would further grade level intercommunications and planning.
Committee Notes
45 | P a g e
Producing Life Long Learners and Active Citizens
Long Range Facility Planning – School Profile Retrieval Sheet
East Omak Elementary School – Grades 3-6
Building Background
Original Construction Date
1958
Subsequent Additions & Remodeling
The original building, which is the center part of the building contains the offices, eight
classrooms and gymnasium. The 1972 addition included a round, open concept, design,
which has since been converted to classrooms. The 1988 addition added four
classrooms, music and art rooms, a kitchen and a larger gym. The building received all
new floor finishes in the early 2000’s as a result of state emergency repair grant.
The building entrance was remodeled in 2014 to accommodate a secure entry into the
building. The entrance included two sets of electronically managed secure doors,
relocating the school office to the front of the building and installing bullet proof glass
between the office staff and those entering the building.
The roof was remodeled in 2014 by installing new roofing material.
During the 2014 summer, the black top parking lot and the black top playground were
resealed.
During the 2015 summer, the black to the west of the school and where the bus
transportation loop is located was replaced.
School Site
715 Omak Avenue, Omak WA 98841
The building sets on a large flat site, with adequate parking and on-site circulation. The
connection to the street, which is a state highway has been improved with sidewalks
and crossing identification.
The building structure is a combination of concrete masonry units and frame
construction with brick facing materials. The roof is a low pitch structure on open web
and wood trusses. Floors are slab on grade.
Major Facility Improvements Needing Attention
Generally the building is in ok condition. The current hvac system is working but the
ventilation within the 5th grade hall way needs to be improved. The current ventilation
system is aging.
The carpet in most of the classroom is in need of being replaced.
Parking has become an issue in front of the building. Accommodating parking for both
staff, parents and those students being picked up has been difficult.
46 | P a g e
Design Capacity / Teaching Stations
The current facility provides room for 20 full size classrooms, 1 gymnasium, 1
cafeteria/multi-purpose Room, 1 library, 10 office spaces and 1 food service kitchen
Community Utilization
The community primarily schedules the use of the Gym and the Cafeteria/Multi-purpose
room. The local soccer league schedules the use of the playground for games.
Staff and Instructional Organization
Certificated Staff
Principal= 1
Counselor= 1
Regular Classroom Teachers= 16
Specialized Programs= 8.5 (SPED, JOM, Bilingual, PE, Computers, Music, Library)
Classified Staff
Instructional Support= 12
Cook= 1
Custodial= 2
Secretarial Support= 2
Grade Configuration / Enrollment / Demographics
Grade Three: 5 Teachers /110/48% White, 20% Hispanic, 32% Native American
Grade Four: 6 Teachers/120/48% White, 20% Hispanic, 32% Native American
Grade Five: 5 Teachers/110/48% White, 20% Hispanic, 32% Native American
Free / Reduced: 78%
Student Transfers
During the 2014-15 school year, 55 students transferred in or out of the building. Many
of which transferred back and forth from another district multiple times.
IN from Other School Districts = 35
OUT to Other School Districts = 20
Facility / Program Overview
Attributes/Challenges: The facility as a whole is in need of replacement. Multiple times over the
last few months, water pipes have burst in the ceiling causing water damage in classrooms. The floor
plan and layout of the facility does not flow. Hallways are small and require lines to be painted on the
floor providing a guide for safe passing.
Committee Notes
47 | P a g e
Omak School District No. 19
Debt Capacity Analysis
Omak School District No. 19
Voted Debt Capacity
2016 Bond Assessed Value $ 631,887,371
Statutory Capacity Rate 5.000%
Total Statutory Capacity $ 31,594,369
Less: Outstanding Voted Debt $ (6,360,000)
Less: Outstanding Non-Voted Debt* -
Plus: Debt Service Fund Balance $ -
Remaining Capacity $ 25,234,369
Omak School District No. 19
Non-Voted Debt Capacity
2016 Bond Assessed Value $ 631,887,371
Statutory Capacity Rate 0.375%
Total Statutory Capacity $ 2,369,578
Less: Outstanding Non-Voted Debt* -
Remaining Capacity $ 2,369,578
* As of September 1, 2015
48 | P a g e
Omak School District - Historical AV.xls/Debt Capacity/Page 1 7/27/2016
Omak School District No. 19
49 | P a g e
Projected Debt Capacity
($ in Thousands)
Omak School District - Historical AV.xls/Projected Debt Capacity (exist)/Page 2 7/27/2016
Date Assessed Valuation
AV Growth Rate
Debt Capacity (5% of AV)
Outstanding Debt Amount Percent
Unused Capacity
12/1/2015 642,442 0.67% 32,122 6,360 25,762 80.2% 12/1/2016 631,887 -1.64% 31,594 5,830 25,764 81.5% 12/1/2017 619,250 -2.00% 30,962 5,275 25,687 83.0% 12/1/2018 619,250 0.00% 30,962 4,695 26,267 84.8% 12/1/2019 619,250 0.00% 30,962 4,095 26,867 86.8% 12/1/2020 619,250 0.00% 30,962 3,475 27,487 88.8% 12/1/2021 625,442 1.00% 31,272 2,840 28,432 90.9% 12/1/2022 631,697 1.00% 31,585 2,170 29,415 93.1% 12/1/2023 638,014 1.00% 31,901 1,475 30,426 95.4% 12/1/2024 644,394 1.00% 32,220 750 31,470 97.7% 12/1/2025 650,838 1.00% 32,542 - 32,542 100.0% 12/1/2026 657,346 1.00% 32,867 - 32,867 100.0% 12/1/2027 663,919 1.00% 33,196 - 33,196 100.0% 12/1/2028 670,559 1.00% 33,528 - 33,528 100.0% 12/1/2029 677,264 1.00% 33,863 - 33,863 100.0% 12/1/2030 684,037 1.00% 34,202 - 34,202 100.0% 12/1/2031 690,877 1.00% 34,544 - 34,544 100.0% 12/1/2032 697,786 1.00% 34,889 - 34,889 100.0% 12/1/2033 704,764 1.00% 35,238 - 35,238 100.0% 12/1/2034 711,811 1.00% 35,591 - 35,591 100.0%
50 | P a g e
51 | P a g e
52 | P a g e
53 | P a g e
54 | P a g e
55 | P a g e
56 | P a g e
57 | P a g e
58 | P a g e
59 | P a g e