Date post: | 31-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sarahi-dalling |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Online modules volgens TPACK
Nataša Brouwer – Universiteit van Amsterdam
SURFacademy, 11 oktober 2011
The importance of university teachers training is not so much in improving their teaching skills but in preparing them to be innovative practitioners.
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
De kloof
Onderwijskunde
vaardigheden
expert in discipline
Content
Nieuwe docent Docentprofessionalisering (BKO)
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)
Pedagogy vaardigheden
expert in discipline
Content
PCK, Lee S. Shulman, 1986, 1987
integratie van content en pedagogy PCK technologie
kennisoverdracht faciliteren van leren
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
“There is no single technological solution that applies for every teacher, every course, or every view of teaching.”
Mishra & Koehler, 2006
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
TPACKMishra & Koehler, 2006
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
MARCHET ProjectMake Relevant Choices in Educational Technology
modules voor docentprofessionalisering over ICT
vijf HO instellingen
projectperiode: 2009-2011
SURF NAP 2008
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
GroepsdiscussieDocentprofessionalisering over ICT
TPACK benadering
A. Wat moeten docenten leren om ICT te kunnen inzetten?
B. Content: aardrijkskunde (bv. wereld steden) Didactiek: ?ICT tool: ?
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Group discussionExperiences with professional development
Results of discussion
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
MARCHET modules
4 online modules: Collaborative knowledge building Social networks (Web 2.0) Measuring knowledge and understanding Supervising students in distance learning
10-12 weken / 20-25 uur
zelfstudie, assignments (individueel, groep)
Video conferencing
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Ontwerp MARCHET modules
Good practice
Deelnemer met eenonderwijsprobleem
Ontwerp MARCHET modules
Zie www.onderwijsontwerpenmetict.nl
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Shirly’s case
Context Cursus: Criminalistics Content: analytische chemie
(methodes) Tool: wiki Didactiek: samen kennis
opbouwen (groepswerk)
Houding na de module Doelen formuleren Herontwerpen Zoeken naar nieuwe tools Zoeken naar nieuwe kennis Projecten aanvragen
Probleem
Kennis over scheikunde analysemethodes die belangrijk zijn in forensisch onderzoek.
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Tools
SURFgroepen / Ning
videoconferencing
Blog
Wiki
discussion forum
annotatie tool
toets tools en clickers
Etc.
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Conclusies
stimuleren van innovatief gedrag van docenten Specifieke oplossingen Eigen onderwijspraktijk (Re)design volgens TPACK of PCK Grassroots projecten
integratie van TPACK in het BKO wenselijk
uitwisseling van ervaringen professionaliseren van moderatoren
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Met dank aan
www.marchet.nl
Anne-Petra Rozendal (team UU)Danielle Townsend (team UM)Janneke van der Loo (team TU/e)Peter Dekker (team HvA)
Docenten en moderatoren van MARCHET modules
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Dank!
Vragen?
SURFacademy, oktober 2011
Students’ excellencedeep learning
Satisfaction of studentsevaluations
Drop outs minimalizationfeasibility
Quality of teachingcontent, teaching staff, methods
higher education quality
Satisfaction of societyemployability
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011
What is the role of ICT?Wat is the role of PD programmes?
Evaluation – effects and satisfaction
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011
Mean SDThe module was as I expected. 3.20 1.14The content of the module inspired me. 4.00 0.94The module's intention was clear to me. 4.20 0.42Working in the module was engaging and enjoyable. 3.50 0.71I could spend my time working on the module flexible enough. 3.90 0.74The assignments were motivating. 3.50 0.71I'm happy with my own contribution. 3.10 0.88The moderator supported the learning process efficiently/good. 3.90 0.57I've got usefull feedback from the other participants. 3.50 1.18Working together as a group was very useful. 3.10 1.10The learning material was of good quality. 3.80 0.79Working in the SURFgroepen environment was evident and easy. 3.80 1.23The online videoconferences were useful. 3.60 1.08I would like to have more online videoconferences. 3.00 1.16The online consultation hours were useful. 3.30 0.48I would like to have more online consultation possibilities. 2.70 0.68I'm satisfied with my course redesign. 3.50 0.53For selfstudy I used ... hours. 2.50 1.18I would recommend this module to other people. 3.80 1.03
Evaluation – effects and satisfaction
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011
Mean SDThe module was as I expected. 3.20 1.14The content of the module inspired me. 4.00 0.94The module's intention was clear to me. 4.20 0.42Working in the module was engaging and enjoyable. 3.50 0.71I could spend my time working on the module flexible enough. 3.90 0.74The assignments were motivating. 3.50 0.71I'm happy with my own contribution. 3.10 0.88The moderator supported the learning process efficiently/good. 3.90 0.57I've got usefull feedback from the other participants. 3.50 1.18Working together as a group was very useful. 3.10 1.10The learning material was of good quality. 3.80 0.79Working in the SURFgroepen environment was evident and easy. 3.80 1.23The online videoconferences were useful. 3.60 1.08I would like to have more online videoconferences. 3.00 1.16The online consultation hours were useful. 3.30 0.48I would like to have more online consultation possibilities. 2.70 0.68I'm satisfied with my course redesign. 3.50 0.53For selfstudy I used ... hours. 2.50 1.18I would recommend this module to other people. 3.80 1.03N=10
P1 First of all: it is difficult to have any expectations for a module that intends to be truely innovative. And beyond that: several parts of the module were still in a rather experimental phase.
P2 Good theoretical and practical knowledge regarding collective Knowledge building
P3 I expected more interaction
P4 I expected the course to inform me on a set of digital tools and it did. It contained more eye-opening moments than I expected.
P5 I expected to learn how to use ICT tools for higher education and I did
P6 In a way it was as I expected, but th on line aspect gave you more freedom and at the same time it was my pitfall concerning time
P7 Including al the bumps in the road. It made the learning experience richer.
P8 Introduction of a few ICT tools and good practices
P9 It was better than expected
P10 The design was clear and the implementation was satisfactory
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011
Evaluation – Change in Beliefs using Norton et al. (2005)
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011
Marginal effect on more interactive teaching beliefs
Evaluation – Change in Intentions using Norton et al. (2005)
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011
Strong significant effect on intentions to motivate students
Semi-structured interviews after three months
most teachers have implemented redesign several teachers indicated to have substantially
changed their beliefs and intentions change in beliefs, intentions and behavior of
teachers takes time
ALT-C 2011, 6-8 September 2011