Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change ... 218666.pdf · Authorized Person MARIAN...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 218666

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 218666Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/08/17Certification Date 2014/10/14Current Property Use InstitutionalIntended Property Use ParklandCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Parkland property use

Property Municipal Address 558 GERRARD STREET EAST, TORONTO,ON, M4M 1X8

1 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name BRIDGEPOINT HEALTH

Authorized Person MARIAN WALSH

Mailing Address 14 ST. MATTHEWS ROAD, TORONTOONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code M4M 2B5

Phone (416) 461-8252

Fax (416) 461-1670

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 558 GERRARD STREET EAST, TORONTO, ON M4M 1X8

Municipality Toronto

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

1904-075-110-00103

Property Identifier Number(s)

21068-0103 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 632,728.00

Northing 4,836,049.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Institutional

Intended Property Use Parkland

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name SERENA CHRISTINE OYAMA

Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act

Limited Member

Membership Number 2460

QP Employer Name TERRAPROBE INC.

Mailing Address 11 INDELL LANE, BRAMPTONONTARIO, L6T 3Y3 CANADA

Phone (905) 796-2650

Fax (905) 796-2250

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Toronto

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Toronto District Office

District Office Address 5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-04-16

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment: Parts 25, 26 & 27, Plan 66R-24227, Part of Lot 15, Concession 1 FTB, City of Toronto, Ontario

2015-02-19 Serena Oyama, Paul Bowen

TERRAPROBE INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


Phase I Environmental Site Assessment: Bridgepoint Lands, Toronto, Ontario

2008-12-01 Valentina Ulloa, Chris Farias

Golder Associates

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment: Land Parcels P1 to P4, Bridgepoint Health/Don Jail Site, Toronto, Ontario

2008-04-01 Adam Affleck, Chris Farias

Golder Associates


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-10-14

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment: Part 25, Part of Lot 15, Conc. 1 From the Bay, Toronto, Ontario

2015-02-25 Russ Pagulayan, Serena Oyama

TERRAPROBE INC.

P2 ESA Update

Updated Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment: Part 25, Part of Lot 15, Conc. 1 From the Bay, Toronto, Ontario

2015-07-06 Russ Pagulayan, Serena Oyama

TERRAPROBE INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/10/14

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.24800

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

MAXXAM ANALYTICS

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/06/15


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.82 1.5 µg/g

2 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g

3 Cyanide (CN-) 0.02 0.051 µg/g

4 Mercury 0.15 0.27 µg/g

5 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g

6 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

7 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

8 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g

9 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g



13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g

14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 3.5 µg/g

15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g

18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g

19 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

20 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g

21 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

22 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

23 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g

24 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g

25 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g

26 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

27 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g

28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g

29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

30 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g

31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

32 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

33 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g

34 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

35 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

...Continued on next page




Continued from previous page....

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 13 µg/g

37 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

38 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 9.4 µg/g

39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 10 55 µg/g

40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g



43 Acenaphthene 0.023 7.9 µg/g

44 Acenaphthylene 0.012 0.15 µg/g

45 Anthracene 0.069 0.67 µg/g

46 Benz[a]anthracene 0.18 0.5 µg/g

47 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.16 0.3 µg/g

48 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.22 0.78 µg/g

49 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.12 6.6 µg/g

50 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.084 0.78 µg/g

51 Chrysene 0.16 7 µg/g

52 Dibenz[a h]anthracene 0.026 0.1 µg/g

53 Fluoranthene 0.42 0.69 µg/g

54 Fluorene 0.033 62 µg/g

55 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.12 0.38 µg/g

56 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.011 0.99 µg/g

57 Naphthalene 0.012 0.6 µg/g

58 Phenanthrene 0.29 6.2 µg/g

59 Pyrene 0.35 78 µg/g

60 Antimony 0.63 7.5 µg/g

61 Arsenic 4.9 18 µg/g

62 Selenium < 0.5 2.4 µg/g

63 Barium 64 390 µg/g

64 Beryllium 0.29 4 µg/g

65 Boron (total) 5.5 120 µg/g

66 Cadmium 0.42 1.2 µg/g

67 Chromium Total 9.8 160 µg/g

68 Cobalt 2.9 22 µg/g

69 Copper 17 140 µg/g

70 Lead 96 120 µg/g






ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

71 Molybdenum < 0.5 6.9 µg/g

72 Nickel 6.6 100 µg/g

73 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

74 Thallium 0.08 1 µg/g

75 Uranium 0.38 23 µg/g

76 Vanadium 27 86 µg/g

77 Zinc 94 340 µg/g

78 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

79 Ethylbenzene < 0.02 2 µg/g

80 Toluene < 0.02 2.3 µg/g

81 Xylene Mixture < 0.02 3.1 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

1 Chromium VI < 0.5 140 µg/L

2 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/L

3 Mercury < 0.1 0.29 µg/L

4 Acetone < 10 130000 µg/L

5 Bromomethane < 0.5 5.6 µg/L

6 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

7 Chlorobenzene < 0.2 630 µg/L

8 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L

9 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L



12 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 4400 µg/L

13 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.2 320 µg/L

14 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

15 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

16 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

18 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L

19 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 5.2 µg/L

20 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L

21 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L

22 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 10 470000 µg/L

23 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 140000 µg/L

24 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.5 190 µg/L

25 Methylene Chloride < 2 610 µg/L

26 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L

27 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L

28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L

29 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

30 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.2 640 µg/L

31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L

32 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

33 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.5 2500 µg/L

34 Vinyl Chloride < 0.2 0.5 µg/L

35 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 85000 µg/L




Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Bromoform < 1 380 µg/L

37 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 82000 µg/L

38 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L

39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



42 Acenaphthene < 0.05 600 µg/L

43 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 1.8 µg/L

44 Anthracene < 0.05 2.4 µg/L

45 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 4.7 µg/L

46 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.01 0.81 µg/L

47 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.75 µg/L

48 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

49 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L

50 Chrysene < 0.05 1 µg/L

51 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.52 µg/L

52 Fluoranthene < 0.05 130 µg/L

53 Fluorene < 0.05 400 µg/L

54 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

55 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 1800 µg/L

56 Naphthalene 0.05 1400 µg/L

57 Phenanthrene 0.085 580 µg/L

58 Pyrene < 0.05 68 µg/L

59 Antimony < 0.5 20000 µg/L

60 Arsenic < 2 1900 µg/L

61 Selenium 4.3 63 µg/L

62 Barium 150 29000 µg/L

63 Beryllium < 0.5 67 µg/L

64 Boron (total) 98 45000 µg/L

65 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L

66 Chromium Total < 5 810 µg/L

67 Cobalt 5.9 66 µg/L

68 Copper 6.1 87 µg/L

69 Lead 0.69 25 µg/L

70 Molybdenum 9.4 9200 µg/L




Ground Water


ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

71 Nickel 11 490 µg/L

72 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L

73 Thallium < 0.05 510 µg/L

74 Uranium 5.4 420 µg/L

75 Vanadium 1.8 250 µg/L

76 Zinc 10 1100 µg/L

77 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L

78 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 2300 µg/L

79 Toluene < 0.2 18000 µg/L

80 Xylene Mixture < 0.2 4200 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

none

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Fill soil was removed from the RSC Property

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 4.5

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)

0.0


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

none

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

none

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

none

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

none

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

none

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

none

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2014/10/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.

As of 2014/10/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2014/10/14, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer TERRAPROBE INC.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/10/14.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, SERENA CHRISTINE OYAMA, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/07/10:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

A copy of No Objection Statement from municipality

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

6.1.2



Certificate of ComplianceLoi canadienne sur les organisations à but non

lucratif art. 290Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act s. 290

Certificat de conformité

Bridgepoint Health

389110-1

Corporate name / Dénomination de l'organisation

Corporation number / Numéro del'organisation

Virginie Ethier

Issuance date (YYYY-MM-DD)Date d'émission (AAAA-MM-JJ)

Director / Directeur

2015-07-09

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above-namedcorporation:

• existe en vertu de la Loi canadienne sur lesorganisations à but non lucratif;

• exists under the Canada Not-for-profitCorporations Act;

• has filed the required annual returns; and • a déposé les rapports annuels exigés; et

JE CERTIFIE, par la présente, quel'organisation susmentionnée :

• has paid all prescribed fees required. • a acquitté tous les droits prescrits exigibles.

Phase One ESA Property

Phase Two ESA and RSC Property Area

X:\1

-Pro

ject

File

s\13

-Env

\201

4\13

-14-

4023

\A. D

wgs

, Log

s\Au

toCA

D\13

-14-

4023

-1 F

IGS

-Spl

ited.

dwg,

Em

man

uel

"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN"(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Area of Potential Environmental Concern

Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One

PropertyPotentially Contaminating

Activity

Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)

Contaminants of Potential Concern

Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or

sediment)

#28 - Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

Other - Ontario Spills

Other - O.Reg 347 Waste Generators

APEC 2 On entire Property #30 - Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

On-site Metals, As, Sb, Se, Cr(VI), Hg, B-HWS, high pH, CN-, low pH, PAHs

Soil and ground water

Notes:

1 ‐ Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present,

as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through,

(a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and

(b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.

2 ‐ Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a

phase one study area

3 ‐ when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the

"Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below:

ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SARCPs PAHs As,Sb,Se Cr(VI)1,4‐Dioxane THMs Na HgDioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B‐HWS Methyl MercuryOcs BTEX Cl‐ high pHPHCs Ca, Mg CN‐ low pH4 ‐ when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached

On entire PropertyAPEC 1 Off site PHCs, BTEX, VOCs Soil and ground water

"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY"(Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)

Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.

2003 - present Bridgepoint Health (name change from Riverdale Centre for Continuing Care)

Site Visit: buildings are occupied by medical offices/charities associated with Bridgepoint Health. Remainder of property covered by open space/parkland

2002 - 2003 The Riverdale Centre for Continuing Care

No other observations

1992 AP: Same two structures present on Property

1985 CD: buildings now occupied by charities (John Howard Society & Street Link Family and Friend)

1971, 1983 Aps: Same two structures present on site

1947, 1957, 1962 APs: Same two residential structures present as shown on the 1890 - 1913 FIPs

1927, 1940, 1954 & 1965 CDs: Buildings listed as residential homes

1890 to 1913 FIPs: Property occupied by two small structures; assumed to be houses1884 FIP: Property vacant and undeveloped

1840 - 1857 Rev. Henry Scadding No other observations1796 - 1840 John Scadding No other observations

Prior to 1796 Crown UndevelopedAgricultural or other use

Crown land undeveloped

Notes:1 ‐ for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies

Agricultural or other useCommercial useCommunity useIndustrial useInstitutional useParkland useResidential use

2 ‐ when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached.

The Corporation of the City of Toronto1857 - 1970

Undeveloped Agricultural or other use

Occupied by two institutional use buildings (part of the Bridgepoint Health complex)

Institutional use

Residential useResidential

Occupied by two small structures ‐ houses converted to medical offices

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario Represented by the Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet

1970 - 2002 Institutional use

Terraprobe

Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering Construction Materials Inspection & Testing

Terraprobe Inc.Greater Toronto Hamilton – Niagara Central Ontario Northern Ontario 11 Indell Lane 903 Barton Street, Unit 22 220 Bayview Drive, Unit 25 1012 Kelly Lake Rd., Unit 1 Brampton, Ontario L6T 3Y3 Stoney Creek, Ontario L8E 5P5 Barrie, Ontario L4N 4Y8 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5P4 (905) 796-2650 Fax: 796-2250 (905) 643-7560 Fax: 643-7559 (705) 739-8355 Fax: 739-8369 (705) 670-0460 Fax: 670-0558

www.terraprobe.ca

UPDATED PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL PART 25, PART OF LOT 15, CONC. 1 FROM THE BAY

CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO

File No 13-14-4022 Revised July 6, 2015

©Terraprobe Inc.

Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022

Terraprobe Page No ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of Previous Investigations .................................................................................. 2

2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT .......... 6 2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity has occurred ......................................... 6 2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern ........................................................................ 6 2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities ..................................................................................... 7

3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ........................................................ 8 3.1 Site Stratigraphy ................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Approximate Depth to Water Table .................................................................................... 8 3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics .................................................................................. 9 3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock .......................................................................................... 9 3.5 Section 41 or 43.1 ............................................................................................................... 9 3.6 Soils Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property ....................................................... 9 3.7 Proposed Buildings ........................................................................................................... 10

4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ..................................... 11 4.1 Applicable Site Condition Standard .................................................................................. 11 4.2 Media Investigated ............................................................................................................ 11 4.3 Sampling Rational ............................................................................................................. 12 4.4 Areas Where Contaminants are Present ............................................................................ 12 4.5 Contaminants Associated with Each Area ........................................................................ 13 4.6 Medium in Which Contaminants are Associated .............................................................. 13 4.7 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area ........................................................ 14 4.8 Distribution of Contaminant ............................................................................................. 14 4.9 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminant ............................................................................ 14 4.10 Migration of Contaminant ................................................................................................ 14 4.11 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration ....................................................... 14 4.12 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings ................................................................................ 14 4.13 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings ................................................................... 15 4.14 Building HVAC ................................................................................................................ 15 4.15 Subsurface Structures and Utilities ................................................................................... 15

5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS .................................................... 16 5.1 Description of All Components ........................................................................................ 16 5.2 Receptor Human Health .................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Receptor Terrestrial Environment ..................................................................................... 18 5.4 Receptor Aquatic Environment ......................................................................................... 18 5.5 Summary of Potential Receptor Risks .............................................................................. 18


Terraprobe Page No iii

FIGURES: Figure 1 – Site Location Plan Figure 2 – APEC Areas Figure 3 – Borehole Location Plan Figure 4 – Ground Water Elevations Figure 5 – Cross Section Locations Figure 6 – Cross Section A-A’ Figure 7 – Cross Section B-B’ Figure 8 – Remediation Cross-Section Figure 9 – Pathways and Receptors APPENDICES: Appendix A – Borehole Logs


Terraprobe Page No 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The following document presents the Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model for the property

identified as Part 25 Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario, hereinafter referred to as “the Property”

or “Property”. The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model is part of the report titled “Updated Phase Two

Environmental Site Assessment, Part 25, Plan 66R-24227 City of Toronto, Ontario” prepared by

Terraprobe Inc. for Bridgepoint Health c/o PCL Constructors Canada Inc.

1.1 Property Description

The Property is irregular in shape and covers an area of approximately 0.248 hectares (2,480 m2). The

Property was occupied by open space/parkland with two small institutional-use structures present. The

general location of the Property is presented on Figure 1.

The Property information is as follows:

Legal Description Block 7 on Plan 66M-2468, designated as Part 25 on Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto

PIN(s) 21068-0103 (LT)

Assessment Roll Number 1904-075-110-00103

Municipal Address 558 Gerrard Street East, Toronto, Ontario

Zoning The property is currently zoned R4-Z1.0 as per City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-06

Area 0.248 hectares

.



1.2 Summary of Previous Investigations

Previous investigations for the Property were provided to Terraprobe for review. The reports are

summarized below:

Report Title Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; Bridgepoint Lands, Toronto Report Date December, 2008 Prepared By Golder Associates Prepared For Bridgepoint Health

The Phase I ESA report covered the current Phase Two Property (Part 25) as well as the surrounding

Bridgepoint Lands. A summary of the report is provided below.

The Phase One Property was partially developed at the time of the 2008 investigation. Part 25 was occupied by two small buildings occupied by medical offices/charities associated with the Bridgepoint Health Hospital. The other parcels of land included in the investigation were occupied by the Bridgepoint Health building, the Old Don Jail, and the New Don Jail.

No fuel storage tanks, waste disposal sites, or other similar items of potential environmental concern were identified directly on Part 25. A possible UST (vent pipes) was noted at the east side of the Don Jail building, about 50 m north of the current Phase One Property.

Golder Associates noted that other subsurface investigations had been conducted at the Property by Pinchin Environmental Limited. The results of those older investigations indicated that fill was present at Part 25. Samples of the fill were reported to contain elevated levels of arsenic, barium, lead and zinc, but no exceedances of the applicable MOE limits were found at that time. No other evidence of potential environmental impact (i.e. staining, odours, etc.) to the soil was noted.

Various fuel spill occurrences were recorded by the MOE at the Old Don Jail Building (550 Gerrard Street East; just north of the Phase One Property).

A number of properties surrounding the Bridgepoint/Don Jail lands were occupied by tenants which included dry cleaning operations, garages, gasoline service stations, and machine shops.

A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was recommended.

Report Title Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Land Parcel P1 to P4, Bridgepoint Health/ Don Jail Site, Toronto, Ontario

Report Date April, 2008 Prepared By Golder Associates Prepared For Bridgepoint Health

In this report, Part 25 was designated as “Parcel 4A”. The other Parcels (P1 to P3) studied are now designated as Parts 6, 9, 19, 21 and 27 on the current survey plan for the Bridgepoint lands.

Fourteen (14) exploratory boreholes were drilled across the entire study area, with four monitoring wells installed upon completion of drilling. Three boreholes were drilled directly in Part 25. One ground water monitoring well was installed in Part 25.

At every borehole, a zone of earth fill was encountered (from 0.2 m to 2.7 m below ground level). The fill was described as “sand to sandy silt, trace clay, occasional gravel, traces of brick’. No odours or staining were identified in the soil samples obtained during drilling.

Native sandy silt soil was encountered beneath the fill. Bedrock was not encountered during drilling. Ground water was not observed in the boreholes during drilling.



Soil samples were analysed for metals, VOCs, and PAHs. The report indicated that all parameters tested were below the MOE Standards at that time. It is noted that all of the soil samples also meet the current (2011) MOE Table 3 Standards.

Groundwater samples were obtained from the monitoring wells installed in each Part. The report indicated no groundwater exceedances were encountered for the parameters (VOCs, metals and PAHs) for which samples were analysed. It is noted that the ground water sample results also meet the current (2011) MOE Table 3 Standards.

The ground water flow direction was determined to be from the northeast to the southwest.

A Phase One Environmental Site Assessment was recently completed for the Phase Two Property by

Terraprobe. The Phase One ESA included this Phase Two Property plus two other land parcels at the

Bridgepoint Health site. The Phase One ESA findings are presented in a report entitled “Phase One

Environmental Site Assessment, Parts 25, 26 and 27, Plan 66R-24227, Part of Lot 15, Concession 1 FTB,

City of Toronto, Ontario”, issued March 24, 2014 (Updated February 19, 2015).

The Phase One ESA identified the following PCAs which could affect the Phase Two and RSC Property:

Phase One Property

Number Location Potentially

Contaminating Activity

Details Media Potentially Impacted

1 On Site All Parts

#30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

Previous investigation identified fill soils at the Property, with elevated levels of arsenic, barium, lead and zinc in the fill soil.

Soil

Phase One Study Area 2 Part 19,

Bridgepoint Lands 50 m north

Others – Ontario Spills

A spill of unknown quantity of varsol to ground on October 22, 1999. Soil contamination was anticipated.


3 Part 19, Bridgepoint Lands 50 m north

Others – O. Reg. 347 Waste Generators

Waste generation occurred from 1989 to 2013 for: aliphatic solvents, light and heavy fuels, pharmaceuticals, pathological wastes, detergent/soaps, paint, pigment and coating at the site.


4 Part 7, Bridgepoint Lands 90 m north

#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

Former USTs were located adjacent to the south of Parcel A prior to 2014. An oily sheen was observed on the ground water sample taken from the site.


8 Part 19 Bridgepoint Lands 50 m north


A possible UST (ex. vent and fill pipes were visible) was noted at the west side of the New Don Jail building in 2008 during a previous site investigation.


9 573 Gerrard St. East 20 m south


The site was formerly occupied by a gasoline station with three USTs on site in 1935.





#52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems

The site was formerly occupied by various automotive service stations from 1930 to 1970.


11 547 Gerrard St. East 15 m southwest


The site was formerly occupied by a gasoline station with three USTs on site from 1929 to 1951.


12 #52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems

Addition of a repair and greasing area appeared to be on site in 1951.


13 #37 – Operation of Dry Cleaning Equipment (where chemical are used)

Two former dry cleaning facilities occupied on site from 1940 to 1980.


14 229 Hamilton St. 65 m south

#10 – Commercial Autobody Shops

The site was formerly occupied by an auto painting building and a garage in 1935.


15 559/563 Gerrard St. East 10 m south


The site was formerly occupied by a gasoline station with three USTs from 1923 to1951.


16 #52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems

A former service station occupied the site in 1930.


17 239 Hamilton St. 35 m south


A former truck garage occupied the site in 1951.


18 #50 – Soap and Detergent Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage

A former soap manufacturer occupied the site in 1951.


29 368 Broadview Ave. 25 m south


Various automotive service stations occupied on site from 1930 to 1970.






A former gasoline station with a garage and a gasoline tank occupied the site from 1932 to 1934.


38 5 Simpson Ave. 60 m northeast


Private owner was approved for a license to operate a gasoline tank in 1926.


47 14 St. Matthews Rd. 100 m north


A 36,706 L commercial fuel oil storage tank for heating was registered on site in 1993.


The PCA locations are provided on Figure 1.

During the completion of previous subsurface investigations at the site by Golder Associates, the ground

water flow direction was determined to be from the northeast towards the southwest. For this reason, the

PCAs which were located downgradient (south) of Part 25 (PCAs 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 29

and 36) were not carried forward as APECs.

The Phase One ESA identified the following Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) on the

Phase Two Property:

APEC 1 is a result of the fuel storage tanks, historical waste generators and historical spill which were located to the north and northeast of the Phase One Property. The APEC includes PCAs 2 to 4, PCA 8, PCA 38, and PCA 47, and includes the entire Phase One Property. The Contaminants of Concern (CoCs) for this APEC are PHCs, VOCs and BTEX. The media potentially impacted are soil and ground water.

APEC 2 is a result of the fill materials (PCA 1) located on the Property based on previous investigations. The APEC includes the entire Property. The Contaminants of Concern (CoCs) are metals, select inorganics and PAHs. The media potentially impacted are soil and ground water.

Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, a Phase Two ESA was recommended.



2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity has occurred

The Phase One Environmental Site Assessment identified the following Potentially Contaminating

Activities (PCAs) on the Phase Two Property and within the Study Area:

PCA Number Location Potentially Contaminating Activity Details PCAs 2 to 4, PCA 8, PCA 38, and PCA 47

Off Site


Other – Ontario Spills

Other – O. Reg. 347 Waste Generators

Records indicate that fuel storage tanks, historical waste generators, and a historical spill were located to the north & northeast of the Property.

PCA1 On Site #30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

Previous investigation identified fill soils at the Property, with elevated levels of arsenic, barium, lead and zinc in the fill soil.

The locations of the PCAs are shown on Figure 1.

2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

Based on the results of the Phase One ESA, the following areas of potential environmental concern

(APEC) resulting from the potentially contaminating activities were identified by at the Phase Two

Property:

APEC Location of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase Two Property

Potentially Contaminating Activity

Location of PCA

Contaminants of Potential Concern

Media Potentially Impacted (Groundwater, Soil and/or Sediment)

1 On Entire Property #28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

Other – Ontario Spills

Other - O. Reg. 347 Waste Generators

Off site PHCs, VOCs, BTEX Soil and Groundwater

2 On Entire Property #30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

Onsite Metals, As, Sb, Se, Cr (VI), Hg, B-HWS, high pH, CN-, low pH, PAHs

Soil and Groundwater

The Phase One ESA recommended that a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment should be

completed to investigate the Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

The location of the APECs are shown on the attached Figure 2.



2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities

Underground utilities are not present on the Property, but they are located along Jack Layton Way to the

north. Based upon this, it is possible that any potentially contaminated ground water could migrate

horizontally along the utilities onto or off the Property.

The site is covered by earth and grass. As such, infiltration of storm water from the ground surface would

occur when a precipitation event occurs. This could cause the downward migration of possible

contaminates.



3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY

3.1 Site Stratigraphy

Pavement Structure

The ground surface of the Phase Two Property was covered with grass and topsoil.

Earth Fill

All of the boreholes encountered a surficial layer of earth fill, which had a thickness of 0.3 to 1.5 metres.

The fill consisted of silty sand or sandy silt with some gravel. No visual or olfactory evidence of potential

environmental impact to the fill was noted.

Native Soil

A layer of native soils consisting of silt, trace sand extending to the maximum depth of investigation (5.2

mbgs) was encountered at all borehole locations. Refer to enclosed borehole logs for stratigraphy details.

Bedrock

Bedrock was not encountered during this investigation.

3.2 Approximate Depth to Water Table

Ground water elevations are presented on the following table. Based upon the ground water elevations,

there appears to be one aquifer present on the property. The aquifer is an unconfined aquifer in the native

soil. The ground water flow direction in the aquifer is relatively flat and flowing in a northerly direction.

Ground water elevations are presented on Figure 4.

MW Well

Depth (m)

Ground Surface

Elevation (masl)

13-June-14

WL (mbgl)

Elevation (masl)

MW1 5.2 100.46 3.50 96.96

MW2 5.2 99.78 3.04 96.74

MW3 5.2 99.94 3.15 96.79

Based on the above measurements, the ground water flow direction at the Phase Two Property appears to

be directed towards the south.



3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics

According to Freeze and Cherry (1979), the typical hydraulic conductivity of the strata investigated at the

Property are:

Earth Fill (Silty Sand) 10-4 m/s to 10-6 m/s

Native Soil (Silt, trace sand) 10-7 m/s to 10-9 m/s

Bedrock (Georgian Bay Formation) 10-4 m/s to 10-8 m/s

The horizontal hydraulic gradient is calculated using the following equation:

i = Δh/Δs

Where,

i = horizontal hydraulic gradient;

Δh (m) = ground water elevation difference; and,

Δs (m) = separation distance.

Based on the available information, horizontal hydraulic gradient of shallow ground water flow is

estimated at 0.02 in a southerly direction.

It is noted that vertical hydraulic gradients were not evaluated for the Property as a second water bearing

unit was not encountered at the depths investigated at the Property.

Contaminants of Potential Concern were not present at concentrations above the applicable site condition

standards in the aquifer investigated.

3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock

The depth to bedrock was inferred from Ontario Geological Survey mapping completed in the area. The

mapping indicated that the bedrock is of the Georgian Bay Formation, and should be encountered at an

elevation of about 70 masl.

3.5 Section 41 or 43.1

Section 41 of the regulation (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) does not apply to the Phase Two Property.

Section 43.1 of the regulation (shallow soil property or water body) does not apply to the Property.

3.6 Soils Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property

No soils have been imported or placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property since the Phase One ESA

was completed in 2014.



3.7 Proposed Buildings

The site will be redeveloped as a public park for the City of Toronto. No new buildings are to be

constructed.



4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY

4.1 Applicable Site Condition Standard

The applicable soil and ground water Standards for the Property were determined to be those in Table 3 of

the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment

Standards for use under part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for

Residential/Institutional/Parkland property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse

textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards).

These are considered to be the applicable Standards for the following reasons:

The Property is to be conveyed to the City of Toronto for redevelopment as a public park.

Soil at the Property was assumed to be coarse-textured for the purposes of this work.

The Property is not within 30 m of a surface water body, or adjacent to any natural areas.

Bedrock across the Property is found at depths of greater than 2 m.

The Property is located in an area of the City of Toronto that is serviced by municipal piped water. The City of Toronto derives its potable water from Lake Ontario.

The soil pH was between 6-9 for surficial soils, and between 5-11 for subsurface soils.

4.2 Media Investigated

Based upon the Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCAs) identified in the Phase One ESA for the

Property, it was decided that investigation was required for:

Soil

Ground water

The following soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis:

Sample Depth

Soil Type Chemical Analysis

(mbgl) Metals PAHs VOC PHC

BH1 SA1A 0.3 Fill X X

BH2 SA1A 0.2 Fill X X

BH3 SA1B 1.0 Native X X DUP 1(BH3

SA1B) 1.0 Fill X X

BH1 SA4B 5.0 Native X X

BH2 SA3 3.6 Native X X

BH3 SA4 4.8 Native X X DUP 2 (BH2

SA3) 3.6 Native X X



The following ground water samples were submitted for chemical analysis:

Sample Chemical Analysis

VOCs PAHs M&I PHC

MW1 X X X X

MW2 X X X X

MW3 X X X X

DUP (MW3) X X X X

TRIP BLANK X

4.3 Sampling Rational

APEC-1 Off-site: Properties occupied by fuel storage tanks, etc.

The Contaminants of Potential Concern associated with APEC-1 include petroleum hydrocarbons

(PHC + BTEX) and VOCs.

Boreholes MW1, MW2 and MW3 were placed within this APEC area to confirm soil quality.

Ground water samples were collected from Monitoring Wells MW1, MW2 and MW3

APEC-2 On-Site: Imported Fill Soils Located Across Property.

The Contaminants of Potential Concern associated with APEC-1 include Metals & Inorganics and

PAHs.

Boreholes MW1, MW2 and MW3 were placed within this APEC area to confirm soil quality.

Ground water samples from Monitoring Wells MW1, MW2 and MW3 were collected to confirm ground

water quality.

4.4 Areas Where Contaminants are Present

The Phase Two ESA used the Table 3 RPI Standards for the soil and ground water as found in the “Soil,

Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”

(April 2011).

APEC-1 Off-site: Properties occupied by fuel storage tanks, etc.

Soil samples from Boreholes 1, 2 and 3 found no exceedances of the MOE Table 3 Standards for

the Contaminants of Potential Concern (PHC + BTEX and VOCs).

No exceedances were found in the ground water samples collected from Monitoring Wells MW1,

MW2 and MW3.



It is concluded based on the soil and ground water sampling that there are no Contaminants of Potential

Concern present about the Table 3 Standards in this APEC.

APEC-2 On-Site: Imported Fill Soils Located Across Property.

The fill soil sample from BH1 found one exceedance of the MOE Table 3 Standards for lead. No

exceedances of the Table 3 Standards were found in the other fill soil samples from the site.

No exceedances of the MOE Table 3 Standards were found in the native soil or the ground water.

After the above-noted exceedance was found, approximately 4.5 cubic meters of fill soil was

excavated and removed from the Property in the vicinity of the exceedance. Confirmatory soil

samples were obtained after the soil was removed and were submitted for laboratory analysis. No

exceedances of the MOE Table 3 Standards were found in the confirmatory samples.

It is concluded based upon the soil sampling conducted as part of the current investigation that (after the

soil removal activities) there are now no Contaminants of Potential Concern above the MOE Table 3

Standards at this APEC location, but formerly one contaminant was present (lead).

4.5 Contaminants Associated with Each Area

The Phase Two ESA used the Table 3 RPI Standards for the soil and ground water as found in the “Soil,

Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”

(April 2011).

Contaminants of Concern were not identified in the ground water above the applicable criteria during the

investigation.

No Contaminants of Potential Concern were identified in the native soil above the applicable Site

Condition Standards.

One contaminant (lead) was identified in the fill soil at APEC #2 during the Phase Two ESA

investigation. The fill soil at that location extended to a maximum depth of 0.3 m below the existing

ground surface. The fill soil at the exceedance location was excavated and removed. Confirmation soil

samples were obtained after the soil was removed and were submitted for laboratory analysis. No

exceedances of the MOE Standards were found in the confirmatory samples.

4.6 Medium in Which Contaminants are Associated

Earth fill, native soils and ground water were investigated as part of the Phase Two ESA. No

Contaminants of Concern were identified above the applicable Site Condition Standards in the native soil

or the ground water during the investigation.



One contaminant was found in the near-surface fill soils. The fill soils were therefore a medium with

which contaminants were associated. The fill soil with the exceedance was subsequently removed from

the Property.

4.7 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area

One Contaminant of Potential Concern was identified in the fill soil at APEC #2, specifically at the

location of Borehole #1. The fill was likely placed at the Property during site development activities. The

fill soil was removed and subsequent soil sampling confirmed that the contaminants are no longer present.

No Contaminants of Potential Concern were identified in the native soil or the ground water in this

APEC.

No other contaminated areas were identified on the Property.

4.8 Distribution of Contaminant

The lead exceedance was found in the fill soil at Borehole #1, at a depth of about 0.3 mbgl. At Borehole

1, the fill soil extended to a depth of about 0.3 m. During remediation, the soil at this location was

excavated to a depth of about 0.5 m and removed from the Property.

4.9 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminant

The contaminant that was found at the Property was identified in the fill which was likely associated

with historical site development activities.

4.10 Migration of Contaminant

It is not expected that the identified contaminant (lead) would migrate.

4.11 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration

The Property was covered by a soft cap (grass). Climatic or meteorological influence on migration of

potential contamination on the Property could occur. Since no Contaminants of Potential Concern are

currently present in the soil and ground water, there is no possibility of future migration of contaminants.

4.12 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings

No Contaminants of Potential Concern were identified in the soil and ground water upon completion of

the investigation, with the exception of the previously identified metals exceedance in the fill soil. Metal

parameters are not contaminants which migrate by soil vapour intrusion. As such there is no possibility

for soil vapour intrusion of contaminants into future buildings.



4.13 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings

No volatile Contaminants of Concern have been identified on the Property. Therefore, it is not expected

that building construction features would affect the distribution and transport of Contaminants of

Concern.

4.14 Building HVAC

No volatile Contaminants of Concern have been identified on the Property. Therefore, it is not expected

that any building HVAC systems would affect the distribution and transport of Contaminants of Concern.

4.15 Subsurface Structures and Utilities

Underground utilities are not present on the Property, but are located in the roadway located directly to

the north. Based upon this, it is possible that any potentially contaminated ground water could migrate

horizontally along the utilities onto or off the Property.



5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS

5.1 Description of All Components

Following is the list of all risk based components of the potential exposure pathways and receptors. These

components are used in this section as well as the graphical representation of the pathways and receptors

presented on Figure 8.

Please note Figure 8 is a graphical representation of potential pathways and receptors and does not have a

scale or orientation which can be related to the Phase Two Property.

GW1 – Ground water for drinking water purposes

GW2 – Ground water for protection from movement to indoor air

GW3 – Ground water for protection of aquatic life

S1 – Soil for protection of a residential receptor from direct contact with surface soil

S2 – Soil for protection from direct soil contact for a lower frequency and intensity exposure than

residential surface soil, such as commercial or industrial scenarios

S3 – Soil for direct soil contact for a low-frequency, high-intensity, human health exposure scenario

without children present that is protective of a worker digging in the soil

S-IA – Soil for protection of movement to indoor air and human exposure

S-OA – Soil for protection of movement to outdoor air and human exposure

S-Odour – Soil for protection of excessive odours

S-GW1 – Soil for protection from movement to ground water for drinking water purposes

S-GW3 – Soil for protection from movement to ground water and then to aquatic life

Plants and Soil Organisms – Soil for protection against adverse effects to plants and soil dwelling

organisms

Mammals and Birds – Soil for protection against adverse effects through direct soil and food ingestion to

mammals and birds



5.2 Receptor Human Health

Potential Pathway

Potential Risks Sources Contaminant of Concern from Phase One ESA

Potential Risks

GW1 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs,

PAHs, PHCs, PCB

No Risk – No Source

GW2 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs,

PAHs, PHCs


S1 Contamination not present in fill material

Contamination not present in native soil Metals, ORPs, VOCs,

PAHs, PHCs




PAHs, PHCs




PAHs, PHCs


S-IA Contamination not present in fill material

Contamination not present in native soil VOCs, PHCs No Risk – No Source

S-OA Contamination not present in fill material

Contamination not present in native soil VOCs, PHCs No Risk – No Source

S-Odour Contamination not present in fill material

Contamination not present in native soil

VOCs, PHCs No Risk – No Source

S-GW1 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs




5.3 Receptor Terrestrial Environment

Potential Pathway


Potential Risks

Plants and Soil Organisms

Contamination not present in fill material


Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs


Mammals and Birds

Contamination not present in fill material


Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs


5.4 Receptor Aquatic Environment

Potential Pathway


Potential Risks

GW3 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs, PCB


S-GW3 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs


5.5 Summary of Potential Receptor Risks

One of the potential Contaminants of Concern identified in the Phase One ESA was identified on the

Property above the applicable full depth Generic Site Condition Standards (lead), but has since been

removed.

No other Potential Contaminants of Concern from the Phase One ESA were found at the Property.

Therefore it is concluded that there are no potential risks associated with the Property in relation to the

Human Receptor, the Terrestrial Environment or the Aquatic Environment.

FIGURES

TERRAPROBE INC.

APEC 1

APEC 2

0 510 15

20m

SCALE

SITE

FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:0

2

APEC AREAS

As Shown

SITE LOCATION:

KEY MAP

NOTES:

FIGURE TITLE:

REV NO.:

DATE:FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:

SCALE:

PROJECT TITLE:

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:

Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering

Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing

Terraprobe Inc.

Phase Two Property Boundary

13-14-4022-2

Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment

December 2014

Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario

APEC 1 - #28 - Gasoline & Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

APEC 2 - #4 - Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

APEC - Area of Potential Environmental Concern

MW1

MW2

MW3

0 510 15

20m

SCALE

SITE

FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:0

3

BOREHOLE / MONITORING WELLLOCATION PLAN

As Shown

SITE LOCATION:

KEY MAP

NOTES:

FIGURE TITLE:

REV NO.:

DATE:FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:

SCALE:

PROJECT TITLE:

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Terraprobe Inc.


13-14-4022-2


December 2014


Approximate Borehole/Monitoring Well Location

Z:\1-P

ro

ject Files\13-En

v\2014\13-14-4022\A

. D

wg

s, Lo

gs\A

uto

CA

D\13-14-4022-2 FIG

S (P

art 25).d

wg

, SK

MW1

MW2

MW3

96.96

96.79

96.74

97.00

9

6

.7

5

9

6

.5

0

0 510 15

20m

SCALE

SITE

FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:0

4

GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS

As Shown

SITE LOCATION:

KEY MAP

NOTES:

FIGURE TITLE:

REV NO.:

DATE:FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:

SCALE:

PROJECT TITLE:

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Terraprobe Inc.


13-14-4022-2


December 2014



96.96

97.00

Ground Water Elevation (mbgs)

Ground Water Contour Line

Z:\1-P

ro

ject Files\13-En

v\2014\13-14-4022\A

. D

wg

s, Lo

gs\A

uto

CA

D\13-14-4022-2 FIG

S (P

art 25).d

wg

, SK

MW1

MW2

MW3

0 510 15

20m

SCALE

SITE

FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:0

5

CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS

As Shown

SITE LOCATION:

KEY MAP

NOTES:

FIGURE TITLE:

REV NO.:

DATE:FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:

SCALE:

PROJECT TITLE:

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Terraprobe Inc.


13-14-4022-2


December 2014



Cross Section Location

A

B

A

'

B

'

Z:\1-P

ro

ject Files\13-En

v\2014\13-14-4022\A

. D

wg

s, Lo

gs\A

uto

CA

D\13-14-4022-2 FIG

S (P

art 25).d

wg

, SK

SITE

FILL

FILL

FILL

FILL

FILL

SILT

SILT

SILT

SILT

SILT

0

Distance Along Cross Section A-A' Baseline (m)

Elevation (m

)

MW

1

MW

2

Ground Surface

Northwest Southeast

FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:0

613-14-4022-2

CROSS SECTION A-A'


As Shown

December 2014

SITE LOCATION:

KEY MAP

NOTES:

FIGURE TITLE:

REV NO.:

DATE:FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:

SCALE:

PROJECT TITLE:

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Terraprobe Inc.

Ground Water Level (mbgs), June 13, 2014


Fill

Silt

CROSS SECTION A-A'

Z:\1-P

ro

ject Files\13-En

v\2014\13-14-4022\A

. D

wg

s, Lo

gs\A

uto

CA

D\13-14-4022-2 FIG

S (P

art 25).d

wg

, SK

SITE

SILT

SILT

SILT

SILT

SILT

SILT

FILL

FILL

FILL

Distance Along Cross Section B-B' Baseline (m)

MW

2

MW

3

Ground Surface

Southwest Northeast

Elevation (m

)

FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:0

713-14-4022-2

CROSS SECTION B-B'


As Shown

December 2014

SITE LOCATION:

KEY MAP

NOTES:

FIGURE TITLE:

REV NO.:

DATE:FIGURE NO.:

FILE NO.:

SCALE:

PROJECT TITLE:

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Terraprobe Inc.

Ground Water Level (mbgs), June 13, 2014


Fill

Silt

CROSS SECTION B-B'

Z:\1-P

ro

ject Files\13-En

v\2014\13-14-4022\A

. D

wg

s, Lo

gs\A

uto

CA

D\13-14-4022-2 FIG

S (P

art 25).d

wg

, SK

APPENDIX A

TERRAPROBE INC.

DP

DP

DP

DP

DP

DP

1A

1B

2

3

4A

4B

FILL, silty sand, trace brick fragments,trace cinders, loose, brown, moist

SILT, trace sand, compact, brown,moist

SILT, some sand, dense, brown, moist

END OF BOREHOLE

Unstabilized water level measured at 3.4m below ground surface; borehole wasopen upon completion of drilling.

WATER LEVEL READINGSDate Water Depth (m) Elevation (m)

Jun 13, 2014 3.5 97.0

99.90.6

95.94.6

95.35.2

0ppm

0ppm

15ppm

10ppm

20ppm

DP1A Analysis:M&I, PAH

DP4A Analysis:VOC, PHC

LiquidLimit

Uns

tabi

lized

Wat

er L

evel

Typ

e

Dep

th S

cale

(m

)

0

1

2

3

4

5

Unconfined Pocket Penetrometer

Field Vane Lab VaneN

umbe

r

Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

40 80 120 160

SOIL PROFILE

GROUND SURFACE

SAMPLES

PlasticLimit

Dynamic ConeNatural

Water Content

100.5

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION (%)

(MIT)

Inst

rum

ent

Det

ails

Gra

phic

Log

Description

Ele

vatio

n S

cale

(m)

100

99

98

97

96

ElevDepth

(m)

SP

T 'N

' Val

ue

Moisture / Plasticity

10 20 30

PL LLMC Hea

dspa

ceV

apou

r

Lab Dataand

Comments

SAGR SI CL

Project No.:

Date started :

Sheet No. :

Position : E: 632718, N: 4836071 (UTM 17T)

13-14-4022-2

May 13, 2014

1 of 1

Client :

Project :

Location :

LOG OF BOREHOLE 1PCL Construction Canada Inc.

Bridgepoint Property Part 25

Toronto, Ontario

Elevation Datum : Local

Rig type : Geoprobe

lib

rary

: lib

rary

- t

erra

prob

e gi

nt.g

lb

rep

ort

: te

rrap

robe

soi

l log

fi

le:

13-1

4-40

22 b

h lo

gs.g

pjTerraprobe

Penetration Test Values(Blows / 0.3m)

10 20 30 40

DP

DP

DP

DP

1A

1B

2

3

FILL, silty sand, some gravel, compact,black to brown, moist

SILT, trace sand, compact, brown togrey, moist to wet

END OF BOREHOLE



Jun 13, 2014 3.0 96.7

98.31.5

94.65.2

0ppm

0ppm

10ppm

35ppm

DP1A Analysis:M&I, PAH

DP3 Analysis:CCME(F1-F4), VOC

LiquidLimit

Uns

tabi

lized

Wat

er L

evel

Typ

e

Dep

th S

cale

(m

)

0

1

2

3

4

5



umbe

r


40 80 120 160

SOIL PROFILE

GROUND SURFACE

SAMPLES

PlasticLimit

Dynamic ConeNatural

Water Content

99.8


(MIT)

Inst

rum

ent

Det

ails

Gra

phic

Log

Description

Ele

vatio

n S

cale

(m)

99

98

97

96

95

ElevDepth

(m)

SP

T 'N

' Val

ue


10 20 30

PL LLMC Hea

dspa

ceV

apou

r

Lab Dataand

Comments

SAGR SI CL

Project No.:

Date started :

Sheet No. :

Position : E: 632737, N: 4836058 (UTM 17T)

13-14-4022-2

May 13, 2014

1 of 1

Client :

Project :

Location :



Toronto, Ontario


Rig type : Geoprobe

lib

rary

: lib

rary

- t

erra

prob

e gi

nt.g

lb

rep

ort

: te

rrap

robe

soi

l log

fi

le:

13-1

4-40

22 b

h lo

gs.g

pjTerraprobe


10 20 30 40

DP

DP

DP

DP

1A

1B

2

3

FILL, silty sand, trace rootlets, loose,dark brown, moist

SILT, some sand, compact, brown togrey, moist to wet

END OF BOREHOLE



Jun 13, 2014 3.2 96.8

99.60.3

94.75.2

0ppm

0ppm

0ppm

10ppm

DP1B Analysis:M&I, PAH

DP3 Analysis:CCME(F1-F4)

LiquidLimit

Uns

tabi

lized

Wat

er L

evel

Typ

e

Dep

th S

cale

(m

)

0

1

2

3

4

5



umbe

r


40 80 120 160

SOIL PROFILE

GROUND SURFACE

SAMPLES

PlasticLimit

Dynamic ConeNatural

Water Content

99.9


(MIT)

Inst

rum

ent

Det

ails

Gra

phic

Log

Description

Ele

vatio

n S

cale

(m)

99

98

97

96

95

ElevDepth

(m)

SP

T 'N

' Val

ue


10 20 30

PL LLMC Hea

dspa

ceV

apou

r

Lab Dataand

Comments

SAGR SI CL

Project No.:

Date started :

Sheet No. :

Position : E: 632735, N: 4836063 (UTM 17T)

13-14-4022-2

May 13, 2014

1 of 1

Client :

Project :

Location :



Toronto, Ontario


Rig type : Geoprobe

lib

rary

: lib

rary

- t

erra

prob

e gi

nt.g

lb

rep

ort

: te

rrap

robe

soi

l log

fi

le:

13-1

4-40

22 b

h lo

gs.g

pjTerraprobe


10 20 30 40

Date post:	01-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times