Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site ... 213546.pdf · RSC Property Geographical...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 213546

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.

Record of Site Condition Number 213546Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2014/07/07Certification Date 2013/03/21Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Background Site Conditions Standard, with

Potable Ground Water, for Residential propertyuse

Property Municipal Address 327 SNUG HARBOUR ROAD, CITY OFKAWARTHA LAKES, ON, K9V 4R6

1 of 18Filed Record of Site Condition # 213546 on 2014/07/07

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name 1088539 ONTARIO INC

Authorized Person ROY GRAHAM

Mailing Address 423 HIGHWAY 36, LINDSAYONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code K9V 4R3

Phone (705) 324-8777

Fax

Email Address [email protected]

Information about the agent

Agent Name NYLE MCILVEEN

Mailing Address 347 PIDO ROAD, PETERBOROUGHONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code K9J 6X7

Phone (705) 749-3317

Fax



RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 327 SNUG HARBOUR ROAD, CITY OF KAWARTHA LAKES, ON K9V 4R6

Municipality Kawartha Lakes

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

165121000005022100

Property Identifier Number(s)

63144-0228 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 681,694.00

Northing 4,923,017.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Commercial

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name NYLE MCILVEEN

Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act

Licence

Licence Number 30506505

QP Employer Name GEO-LOGIC INC

Mailing Address 347 PIDO ROAD, PETERBOROUGH ONTARIO, K9H 6X7 CANADA

Phone (705) 749-3317

Fax (705) 749-9248


Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Kawartha Lakes

Ministry of the Environment District Office

District Office Peterborough District Office

District Office Address 300 Water Street, Robinson Place, Peterborough ON K9J 8M5


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2013/02/06

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assesment Report Proposed Residential Development 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes Ontario

2013/02/28 Nyle McIlveen GEO-LOGIC INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


Environmental Assessment Report 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes Ontario

2008/11/26 Mark Jeffery Jeffery Environmental Consultants Inc

Underground Storage Removal Report 2008/04/30 Mark Jeffery Jeffery Environmental Consultants Inc

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes

2007/01/19 Tom Hlavacek Trow

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes



Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2013/03/21

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Proposed Residential Development 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes Ont

2013/04/09 Nyle Mcilveen GEO-LOGIC INC

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


Environmental Site Assessment Report 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes ontario

2008/11/26 Mark Jeffery Jeffery Environmental Consultants Inc

Underground Storage Tank Removal Report 2008/04/30 Mark Jeffery Jeffery Environmental Consultants Inc

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes


Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 327 Snug Harbour Road City of Kawartha Lakes



Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? Yes

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2013/03/21

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 11.21000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture

Assessment/Restoration Approach Background

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

CADUCEON

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 1


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Antimony < 0.5 1.3 µg/g

2 Arsenic 1.4 18 µg/g

3 Barium 56 220 µg/g

4 Beryllium 0.4 2.5 µg/g

5 Boron (total) 5.6 36 µg/g

6 Cadmium 0.09 1.2 µg/g

7 Chromium Total 13 70 µg/g

8 Chromium VI < 0.5 0.66 µg/g

9 Cobalt 5 21 µg/g

10 Copper 11 92 µg/g

11 Lead 8 120 µg/g

12 Mercury 0.017 0.27 µg/g

13 Molybdenum < 1 2 µg/g

14 Nickel 7 82 µg/g

15 Selenium 0.7 1.5 µg/g

16 Silver < 0.2 0.5 µg/g

17 Thallium 0.1 1 µg/g

18 Uranium 0.5 2.5 µg/g

19 Vanadium 20.6 86 µg/g

20 Zinc 31 290 µg/g

21 Acetone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

22 Benzene < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

23 Bromodichloromethane < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

24 Bromoform < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

25 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

26 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

27 Chlorobenzene < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

28 Chloroform < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

29 Dibromochloromethane < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

30 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g



33 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

34 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

35 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

36 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

37 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

38 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

39 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g


39 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

40 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

41 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

42 Ethylene dibromide < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

43 Hexane (n) < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

44 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

45 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g

46 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

47 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

48 Styrene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

49 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

50 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

51 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

52 Toluene < 0.2 0.2 µg/g

53 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

54 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

55 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.02 0.05 µg/g

56 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

57 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.02 0.25 µg/g

58 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

59 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

60 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 10 25 µg/g

61 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 5 10 µg/g

62 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 40 240 µg/g

63 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 30 120 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Acetone < 30 2700 µg/L

2 Benzene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

3 Bromodichloromethane < 2 2 µg/L

4 Bromoform < 5 5 µg/L

5 Bromomethane < 0.5 0.89 µg/L

6 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

7 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

8 Chloroform < 1 2 µg/L

9 Dibromochloromethane < 2 2 µg/L

10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L



13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 2 590 µg/L

14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

19 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

20 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

21 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

22 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

23 Hexane (n) < 5 5 µg/L

24 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 20 400 µg/L

25 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 20 640 µg/L

26 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 15 µg/L

27 Methylene Chloride < 5 5 µg/L

28 Styrene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 1.1 µg/L

30 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

31 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

32 Toluene < 0.5 0.8 µg/L

33 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

34 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

35 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

36 Trichlorofluoromethane < 5 150 µg/L

37 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

38 Xylene Mixture 1.4 72 µg/L

39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 50 420 µg/L


39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 50 420 µg/L

40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 50 150 µg/L



43 Trichloroethylene < 0.5 0.5 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2013/03/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation

As of 2013/03/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth background site condition standards prescribed by section 34 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSCis filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified ina Risk Assessment.

As of 2013/03/21, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registrycontains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer GEO-LOGIC INCdoes not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2013/03/21.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, NYLE MCILVEEN, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/05/25:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment as part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Authorization for Agent to submit RSC for filing

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

v 4.1.1



Request ID: 016387747 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2014/04/25Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le :Transaction ID: 54057211 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 10:36:54Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à :Category ID: CTCatégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUSATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère desrecords of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestonsServices que la société

1 0 8 8 5 3 9 O N T A R I O I N C .

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)

0 0 1 0 8 8 5 3 9

is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou néeamalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de lathe laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le

J A N U A R Y 2 4 J A N V I E R , 1 9 9 5

and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le

A P R I L 2 5 A V R I L , 2 0 1 4

DirectorDirecteur

The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.

La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

Phase One, Two

and RSC Property

Table of Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

Area of Potential Environmental Concern1

Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property

Potentially Contaminating Activity2

Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)

Contaminants of Potential Concern3

Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment)

A – Marine maintenance area

West area Item #27 (garages and maintenance and repair of railcars, marine vehicles and aviation vehicles)

Off-site PHCs and VOCs Soil and Groundwater

B – Historical gasoline USTs, pump and re-fuelling activities. Potential residua contamination following remediation completed by other consultants

Southwest area where UST was historically located

Item #28 (gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks)

On-site PHCs and BTEX Soil and groundwater

C – Soil of unknown quality

Eastern field area and area where fill was placed following remediation activities

Item #30 (importation of fill material of unknown quality)

On-site Metals and pH Soil

Notes:1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a Phase One Property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the Phase One Property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a Phase One Study area3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Methods Groups as identified in the "Protocol for the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below:

ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical conductivity SARCPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI)1,4-Dioxane THMs Na HgDioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl MercuryOCs BTEX Cl- high pH

PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low pH

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Year Name of Owner Description of Property

Use Property Use1

Other Observations from Aerial Photos, FIPs, etc

1995 – Present

1088539 Ontario Inc. Boat moorings and storage

Commercial use

Aerial photos, interview and land registry: Aerial photographs from 2004, 2006 and 2012 show current property layout including boat moorings, launch and undeveloped land to the east of Snug Harbour Road. Trailers from former seasonal park are removed and no fuel pumps are visible. Swimming pool and Quonset hut are located close to the road. Land registry provided the ownership information.

1988 – 1995

Albert, Theresa, Joseph, Amy, Gordon and Isabela Love

Boat moorings and storage Interview and land registry: Land registry provided ownership information.

1962 – 1988

John Worsley Boat launch and seasonal trailer park

Aerial photos and Land registry: Aerial photograph from 1966 shows a building in southwest corner of Property and roughed in roadways to access trailers and boat storage. Aerial photographs from 1976 show further development of seasonal trailer park. By 1981 the trailer park area has been reduced while the boat moorings area has further developed and also shows a pier. Land registry provided the ownership information.

1950-1962

Lloyd Thurston Boat launch Aerial photo and land registry: 1959 air photo shows a possible boat launch and parking area in southwest area. Majority of the lands remain undeveloped that is assumed to be agricultural land. Land registry provided the ownership information.

1923 – 1950

Arthur Thurston

Undeveloped and/or agricultural land

Agricultural or other use

Aerial photo and land registry: Aerial photograph from 1928 shows undeveloped land assumed to be agricultural land. Land registry provided the ownership information.

1915 – 1923

Everett Mitchell

Land registry: Land registry provided the ownership information.

1902 – 1915

Francis Brien

1890 – 1902

George Crandel

1856 – 1890

Benjamin Sawyer

1851 – 1856

Peter Perry

Prior to 1851

Crown Land

Notes: 1 – the following types of property uses were considered:

Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Based on the Phase Two ESA completed, a conceptual site model was prepared. Geo-

Logic has prepared site plans and a narrative (following the table below) describing the

Property. The following table is prepared in accordance with the Regulation.

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

i. Description and

assessment of,

A) Areas where potentially contaminating activity has occurred

Areas identified as PCAs include historical underground fuel storage tanks (USTs) for re-fuelling, fill and an off-site marina maintenance area. The PCAs, as listed within Table 2 PCAs of Part VI, Section 19 of the Regulation, are best described as Item no 27 (Garages and maintenance and repair of rail cars, marine vehicles, and aviation vehicles), Item no. 28. (Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks) and Item no. 30 (Importation of fill material of unknown quality). The PCA areas are primarily in the southwest area of the Property where remedial works have previously been completed. No other PCAs were identified.

B) Areas of potential environmental concern

APECs were identified related to the PCAs. Three APECs were outlined as shown on the Conceptual Site Model related to soil quality of material used, historical USTs and an off-site marina maintenance area.

C) Any subsurface structures and utilities on, in or under the Phase Two Property that may affect contaminant distribution and transport

It is Geo-Logic’s opinion that there are no subsurface structures or utilities at the Property that would affect contaminant distribution and transport.

ii. Description of and, as appropriate, figures illustrating the physical setting of the Phase Two Property and any areas under it including,

A) Stratigraphy from ground surface to the deepest aquifer investigated

The stratigraphy of the Property is fill overlying till (brown silty sand with clay). The till has gravel and was generally moist and compact. Well records generally indicate the stratigraphy to be a shallow layer of topsoil underlain by 2 to 12 metres of clay till underlain by bedrock.

B) Hydrogeological characteristics including aquifers in each hydrostratigraphic unit where one or more contaminants is present at concentrations above the applicable site condition standards, lateral and vertical gradients

The aquifer is protected by an overlying till layer ranging from 2 m to 6 m. In the area of the Property, the till layer is on the order of 2 m to 12 m

C) Approximate depth to bedrock Bedrock was encountered at this property at testpits TP-2, TP-4 and TP-5 at depths from 2.62 to 3.02 mbeg during the Phase Two investigation

D) Approximate depth to water table Water was encountered during the Phase Two investigation at depths of 0.9 to 1.9 metres below grade in the area at the west of the Property where the boreholes were advanced close to Sturgeon Lake. Water levels were measured on March 19, 2013. Additionally groundwater seepage was noted at testpits TP-2, TP-3 and TP-4 from0.9 to 2.4 mbeg.

E) Any respect in which section 41 or 43.1 of the regulation applies to the property

As per Section 41, the Property is not within, adjacent to or within 30 m of an area of natural significance, and does not have soil with pH less than 5 (surface and subsurface soil) or pH greater than 9 or 11 (surface and subsurface soil, respectively). It is the opinion of the Qualified Person that Section 41 does not apply. As per Section 43.1, the Property is not a shallow soil property; however, is adjacent to a water body. Section 43.1 does apply.

F) Areas where soil has been brought

from another property and placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property

No documentation has been provided to Geo-Logic that soil has been brought from another property and placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property. However, the remediated areas are inferred to have been backfilled with granular material of unknown quality.

G) Approximate locations, if known, of any proposed building and other structures

The proposed residential subdivision consists of 18 residential detached homes to the west of Snug Harbour Road with 4 condominium townhomes located on the east side of Snug Harbour Road. Snug Harbour Road bisects the land.

iii. Where a contaminant is present on, in or under the Phase Two property at a concentration greater than the applicable SCS, identification of,

A) Each area where a contaminant is present on, in or under the Phase Two Property at a concentration greater than the applicable SCS

Not applicable. No contaminants above the SCS at this Property in the areas tested. Soil concentrations of the samples submitted met the applicable site condition standard (MOE Standards for Table 1)

B) The contaminants associated with each of the areas referred to in subparagraph A

Not applicable. There are no contaminants with concentrations above the SCS for the APEC.

C) Each medium in which a contaminant associated with an area referred to in subparagraph is present


D) A description and assessment of what is known about each of the areas referred to in A


E) The distribution, in each of the areas referred to in A, of each contaminant present a concentration greater, for each medium in which the contaminant is present.


F) Anything known about the reason for the discharge of the contaminants present on, in or under the Phase Two Property at a concentration greater than the SCS in the natural environment


G) Anything known about migration of the contaminants present on, in or under the Phase Two Property at a concentration greater than the applicable SCS away from any APEC including the identification of any preferential pathways


H) Climatic or meteorological conditions that may have influenced distribution and migration of the contaminants, such as temporal fluctuations in ground water levels


I) If applicable, information concerning soil vapour intrusion of the contaminants into buildings including: 1. Relevant construction features of

a building such as a basement or crawl space

2. Building heating, ventilating and air conditioning design and operation

3. Subsurface utilities


iv. Where contaminants on, in or under the

A. The lateral and vertical distribution of a contaminant in each area where

Not applicable. There are no contaminants with

Phase Two Property are present at concentrations greater than the applicable SCS, one or more cross-sections showing

the contaminants is present at concentrations greater than the applicable SCS in soil, groundwater and sediment

concentrations above the SCS for the APEC.

B. Approximate depth to water table in each area referred to in subparagraph A


C. Stratigraphy from ground surface to the deepest aquifer or aquitard investigated


D. Any subsurface structures and utilities that may affect contaminant distribution and transport in each area referred to in subparagraph A


v. For each areas where a contaminant is present on, in or under the property at a concentration greater than the applicable SCS for the contaminant, a diagram identifying, with narrative explanatory notes

A. The release mechanisms Not applicable. There are no contaminants with concentrations above the SCS for the APEC.

B. The contaminant transport pathway Not applicable. There are no contaminants with concentrations above the SCS for the APEC.

C. The human and ecological receptors located on, in or under the Phase Two Property


D. Receptor exposure points Not applicable. There are no contaminants with concentrations above the SCS for the APEC.

E. Routes of exposure Not applicable. There are no contaminants with concentrations above the SCS for the APEC.

The Property is approximately 11.21 ha and is a commercial property known as the

“Moorings at Snug Harbour” with a storage Quonset-style building, several small

sheds/structures and undeveloped area to the east of Snug Harbour Road. The

topography slopes toward the lake with relief on the order of 20 m. The location of the

Property is provided on Plates 1, 2 and 3 in Section 9.2.

The Phase Two CSM overviews the surface and subsurface conditions of the site

including the topography, soil sampling locations and groundwater flow direction.

APECs and PCAs were identified on-site related the operation of an underground storage

tank for gas and re-fuelling area. An APEC and PCA were also identified related to fill

material used following the remediation activities. An off-site marina maintenance area

was also identified as a PCA. The APECs and PCAs are outlined on the Phase One

CSM, Plates 4, 5 and 6 in Section 9.2.

A total of 11 test holes were advanced to address the APECs and PCAs identified.

Reference is made to the test hole logs in Section 10.1.2 for details including local soil

and geology classification, stratigraphy and monitoring well details. The stratigraphy

generally is comprised of fill overlying a silty sand till then limestone bedrock. The

locations of the test holes are illustrated on the Test Hole Plan, Plate 7 in Section 9.2.

Soil and groundwater testing was completed and analyzed in comparison with the MOE

Table 1 Full Depth Background Site Condition Standards due to the proximity of

Sturgeon Lake. Five (5) representative soil samples were taken from the test holes and

analyzed for pH, metals, PHCs and VOCs or BTEX. The results of the soil analyses

were within MOE Table 1 standards. Groundwater was encountered within the boreholes

drilled near the lake and 4 monitoring wells were installed for monitoring and testing. A

total of 4 samples were collected (includes one duplicate sample) and a trip blank for

PHCs and VOCs. The results of the groundwater analyses were within MOE Table 1

standards. Groundwater elevations from the monitoring wells is illustrated on the plan

entitled Groundwater Elevations, Plate 8 in Section 9.2

A Phase Two Conceptual Site Model was prepared as Plates 12 and 13 within Section 9.2

summarizing the ESA including APEC and PCA locations, test holes and sample results.

Supplemental information regarding site subsurface conditions has been prepared and is

provided on the Cross-Sections, Plates 9, 10 and 11 in Section 9.2. Subsurface utilities

are limited to a plastic water line from the well, septic field piping and buried hydro lines

and are not expected to provide preferential pathways.

Based on the subsurface exploration program and assessment of the chemical results, the

Property meets the MOE Standards for a Table 1 property. Thus, this ESA has

investigated the APECs and PCAs and addressed issues related to fill and historical and

current operations both on-site and off-site. The Property is considered to have a low

level of concern from an environmental perspective and is suitable for its proposed usage

as a residential development.

Phase Two ESAProposed Residential Development

Snug Harbour RoadCity of Kawartha Lakes, Ontario 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29

PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7

VICINITY PLAN DATE: APRIL 2013

SCALE: 1:50,000

JOB NUMBER: G024343E1

Base map compiled from Energy, Mines and Resources Canada Map 31 E/1

dated 1996 (aerial photograph 1994). Edition 7, UTM Zone 18.DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 1

(705) 749-3317 FAX (705) 749-9248 www.geo-logic.ca

PHASE TWO PROPERTY

Phase Two ESA

Proposed Residential Development

Snug Harbour Road

City of Kawartha Lakes, Ontario


347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29


PROPERTY PLAN DATE: APRIL 2013

SCALE: 1:10,000


Base map complied from MNR NRVIS 2013. Producted by CRA under licence

from MNR. Queen's Printer. NAD 1983, UTM Zone 17N.DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 2

PHASE TWO PROPERTY

TP-6

Phase Two ESA


Snug Harbour Road



Image obtained from Bing Maps dated 2010. (705) 749-3317 FAX (705) 749-9248 www.geo-logic.ca


DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 3

PLOT PLAN DATE: APRIL 2013

SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR

347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29

Snug Harbour Road

Pasture Road

500ft

100m

PHASE TWO PROPERTY

TP-6

PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7Image obtained from Bing maps dated 2010

PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL DATE: APRIL 2013

Phase One Study AreaSCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR


JOB NUMBER: G024343E1Snug Harbour Road 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29

City of Kawartha Lakes, ONDRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 4


Snug Harbour Road

Pasture Road

200 Metres

Shallow groundwater flow (inferred)

LEGEND:

Property boundary

Phase One Study Area(250 m from Property)

Phase One Study

Area (<250 m

from Property)

Residential

Sturgeon Lake

Boat Moorings Phase Two

Property

TP-6



Property AreaSCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR





Shallow groundwater flow (inferred)

LEGEND:

Property boundary

A B

C

50 Metres

C

C

C

C

C

C

See more detailed

inset on Plate 6.

Well

Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs)

APECs Description of

Area Potential Environmental Concern Potential Impacts

A Marine maintenance area

Item #27 Garages and maintenance and repair of rail cars, marine vehicles, and aviation vehicles.

Soil & GW – PHCs & VOCs

B Re-fuelling area and former UST

Item #28 Gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks

Soil & GW – PHCs & BTEX

C Fill materials Item #30 Importation of fill material of unknown quality

Soil – Metals & pH

Notes: PHCs=petroleum hydrocarbons; BTEX=benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes; VOCs=volatile organic compounds; GW = groundwater; Soil conditions anticipated are fill underlain by till then limestone; shallow perched water conditions may be present; water flow inferred to be toward Sturgeon Lake; Utilities entering property not expected to provide preferential pathways.

Phase Two

Property

TP-6



InsetSCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR





LEGEND:

Excavations by JEC (2008)MWs by JEC (2008)Sample Locations by JEC (2008)MW by Trow (2007)

Former UST area

Refuelling Area

Snug Harbour RoadMarineMaintenance Area

Storage

Pool

Covered Docks

Former Store

Main Buildings

20m

50ft

Pool House andRestroomsB

AC

B

Shallow groundwater flow

Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs)

APECs Description of

Area Potential Environmental Concern

Potential Impacts

A Marine maintenance area

Item #27 Garages and maintenance and repair of rail cars, marine vehicles, and aviation vehicles.

Soil & GW – PHCs & VOCs

B Re-fuelling area and former UST

Item #28 Gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks

Soil & GW – PHCs & BTEX

C Fill materials Item #30 Importation of fill material of unknown quality

Soil – Metals & pH

Notes: PHCs=petroleum hydrocarbons; BTEX=benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes; VOCs=volatile organic compounds; GW = groundwater; Soil conditions anticipated are fill underlain by till then limestone; shallow perched water conditions may be present; water flow inferred to be toward Sturgeon Lake; Utilit ies entering property not expected to provide preferential pathways.

Property

Boundary

CB

TP-6


Snug Harbour RoadCity of Kawartha Lakes, ON


Image obtained from Bing maps dated 2010DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 7


TEST HOLE PLAN DATE: APRIL 2013


JOB NUMBER: G024343E1347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29

LEGEND:

Property boundary

Borehole with Peizometer

Testpit TP-1

TP-3

TP-4

TP-5

TP-6BH-2

TP-2

BH-1

BH-4BH-3

BH-5

Phase Two

Property

TP-6


Snug Harbour RoadCity of Kawartha Lakes, ON




GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS DATE: APRIL 2013



LEGEND

Borehole

Groundwater

Elevation (masl)

Groundwater

Elevation

Contour

BH-3

98.5

98.5

BH-1

100.5

101

100

99

20 metres

BH-5

99.1

BH-2

99.2

BH-4

TP-6

Phase Two ESA


Snug Harbour Road



Image obtained from Bing Maps and dated 2010 (approximate). DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 9


CROSS-SECTION ALIGNMENTS DATE: APRIL 2013



LEGEND:Bore Holes

Test pits

Snug Harbour Road

Sturgeon Lake

250ft50m

TP-1

TP-2

TP-3

TP-4

TP-5

TP-6

BH-1

BH-2BH-3

BH-4

BH-5

PHASE TWO PROPERTY

A

A'

B'

B

Phase Two ESA


Snug Harbour Road

City of Kawartha Lakes, Ontario 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29

PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7(705) 749-3317 FAX (705) 749-9248 www.geo-logic.ca

Cross-section as per alignment shown on Plate 9. Approximate ground surface based upon Ivan Wallace survey

dated March 5, 2013.


CROSS-SECTION A-A' DATE: APRIL 2013

SCALE: AS INDICATED


253

252

254

255

256

257m

etre

s ab

ove

sea

leve

l

A

0 300 m 400 m200 m100 m

Approx. ground surface

Topsoil

Fill (silty sand)

251

250

TP-1

TP-2

*Locations and depths are based upon field work completed by Geo-Logic and survey completed by Ivan Wallace dated March 5, 2013.

A'

Till

Topsoil

Fill (silt & sand)

TopsoilFill (silt & sand)

Till

Refusal on possible bedrock

Seepage observed 1.4 m

LegendVertical Exaggeration = ~14 x

Phase Two ESA


Snug Harbour Road

City of Kawartha Lakes, Ontario 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29

PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7(705) 749-3317 FAX (705) 749-9248 www.geo-logic.ca

Cross-section as per alignment shown on Plate 9. Approximate ground surface based upon Ivan Wallace survey

dated March 5, 2013.


CROSS-SECTION B-B' DATE: APRIL 2013

SCALE: AS INDICATED


255

250

260

265

270

275m

etre

s ab

ove

sea

leve

l

B

0 300 m 400 m200 m100 m

Approx. ground surface

Fill

245

240

BH-5

*Locations and depths are based upon field work completed by Geo-Logic and survey completed by Ivan Wallace dated March 5, 2013.

B'

Till

Topsoil

Refusal on possible bedrock

Seepage observed 1.4 m

500 m

BH-4

TP-4

Till

LegendBH-5 Water Level: 1.01 mVertical Exaggeration = ~6 x

Snug Harbour Road

TP-6

Property AreaPhase Two ESA

Proposed Residential DevelopmentSnug Harbour Road

City of Kawartha Lakes, ON PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7



PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL DATE: APRIL 2013



LEGEND:

Property boundary

Borehole

Test Pit

TP-1

TP-3

TP-4

TP-5

TP-6

50 Metres

BH-2

TP-2

BH-1

BH-4BH-3

BH-5

C

C

C

C

C

C

Phase Two

Property

See more detailed

inset on Plate 13.

Area of Potential Environmental Concern APEC Test

Holes Piezometer Installed

Potential Environmental Concern Potential Impacts

A BH-1 BH-5

Yes Impacts from PHCs/BTEX associated with removed gas UST & re-fuelling.

Soil & GW meets MOE Table 1; no issues

B BH-1, BH-3, BH-5

No Impacts from PHCs/VOCs associated with off-site marine maintenance area

Soil & GW tested meets MOE Table 1; no issues

C

BH-1, BH-4, TP-2, TP-6

No Impacts from metals and pH in fill. Soil meets MOE Table 1; no issues

Notes: BH=borehole; TP=test pit; GW = groundwater; Soil conditions encountered were fill underlain by till. Inferred bedrock encountered at TP-2, TP-4, and TP-5. Regional groundwater flow toward Sturgeon Lake; Subsurface utilities not expected to act as potential preferential migration pathway. Table 1 refers to MOE Table 1 Standards (full depth background site condition standards)

TP-6


Snug Harbour RoadCity of Kawartha Lakes, ON PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7

Image obtained from Bing maps dated 2010 (705) 749-3317 FAX (705) 749-9248 www.geo-logic.ca

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL DATE: APRIL 2013



Inset


Quonset-style building

LEGEND:Geo-Logic testholes

Excavations by JEC (2008)

MWs by JEC (2008

Sample Locations by JEC (2008

MW by Trow (2007

Former UST

Re-fuelling Area

Snug Harbour Road

MarineMaintenance Area

Pool

Covered Docks

Former Store

Main Buildings

20m50ft

Pool House andRestrooms

BH-1

BH-2

BH-3

BH-4BH-5

B

A

C

B

CB

Property

Boundary

Area of Potential Environmental Concern APEC Test

Holes Piezometer Installed

Potential Environmental Concern Potential Impacts

A BH-1 BH-5

Yes Impacts from PHCs/BTEX associated with removed gas UST & re-fuelling.

Soil & GW meets MOE Table 1; no issues

B BH-1, BH-3, BH-5

No Impacts from PHCs/VOCs associated with off-site marine maintenance area

Soil & GW tested meets MOE Table 1; no issues

C

BH-1, BH-4, TP-2, TP-6

No Impacts from metals and pH in fill. Soil meets MOE Table 1; no issues

Notes: BH=borehole; TP=test pit; GW = groundwater; Soil conditions encountered were fill underlain by till. Inferred bedrock encountered at TP-2, TP-4, and TP-5. Regional groundwater flow toward Sturgeon Lake; Subsurface utilities not expected to act as potential preferential migration pathway. Table 1 refers to MOE Table 1 Standards (full depth background site condition standards)

Date post:	24-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times