+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Date post: 11-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: barry-smith
View: 432 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
How to do things with documents
Popular Tags:
72
How to Do Things With Documents Barry Smith Department of Philosophy National Center for Ontological Research University at Buffalo http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith 1
Transcript
Page 1: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

How to Do Things With Documents

Barry Smith

Department of Philosophy National Center for Ontological Research

University at Buffalo

http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith

1

Page 2: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

• picture of a Florida beach condo

2

Page 3: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Some processes in the social realm

• In 2007, a bank in Florida lends you $1 million

• You buy a beach condo for $1 million

• In 2008, the value of your condo collapses

• You owe the bank $1 million but your house is worth only $500,000

• You walk away from the loan and give the keys back to the bank

3

Page 4: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Some objects in the social realm• The bank• The condo• The price you paid in 2007• The price you could get in 2008• Your mortgage• Your mortgage contract• Your signature on the mortgage contract• Your breaching of the mortgage contract• The value of the mortgage in 2007

4

Page 5: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Some ontological questions

• What is a debt?

• What is a mortgage?

• What is a mortgage contract?

• What is a signature?

• What is a credit card?

• What is a credit card number?

Why do Plato and Kant have no answers to such questions?

5

Page 6: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Not your grandmother’s ontology

• Catherine wheel effect (compare how psychology became a science independent of philosophy in the 1890s)

• so today: ontology is beginning to free itself from the philosophical mother-ship to become a discipline in its own right

6

Page 7: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

7

Google hits Jan. 2004

• ontology + Heidegger 58K• ontology + Aristotle 77K• ontology + philosophy 327K• ontology + software 468K• ontology + database 594K• ontology + information systems 702K

Page 8: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

8

Google hits Oct. 2009

• ontology + Heidegger 1.62M• ontology + Aristotle 1.65M• ontology + philosophy 4.86M• ontology + software 6.91M• ontology + database 8.66M• ontology + information systems 9.37M

Page 9: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

9

Comparison 2004/2009

ontology + Heidegger 58K 1.62M

ontology + Aristotle 77K 1.65M

ontology + philosophy 327K 4.86M

ontology + software 468K 6.91M

ontology + database 594K 8.66M

ontology +information systems 702K 9.37M

Page 10: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

10

Page 11: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

11

Page 12: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011
Page 13: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

http://tinyurl.com/63q5kb9

Page 14: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Agenda

• What holds society together– The Searle thesis (speech acts)

– The de Soto thesis (how documents created civilization)

• How to do things with documents in an African village

• The ontology of toxic assets

14

Page 15: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Systems of mutually correlated claims and obligations

are essential to the workings of societies both large and small

compare how traffic laws are essential to the workings of roads

15

Page 16: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

John Searle

Page 17: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The Searle Thesis

Through the performance of speech acts (acts of promising, marrying, accusing, baptising) we change the world by bringing into being claims, obligations, rights, relations of authority, debts, permissions, names, and a variety of other sorts of entities making up the ontology of the social world.

17

Page 18: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

In the local case, when you make a promise

• Your obligation is tied to psychological factors: memories, expectations, your desire to preserve your good name

18

Page 19: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The de Soto Thesis

Documents and document systems are mechanisms for creating the institutional orders of modern societies

The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West

and Fails Everywhere Else,New York: Basic Books, 2000

19

Page 20: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Hernando de SotoInstitute for Liberty and Democracy, Lima, Peru

Bill Clinton: “The most promising anti-poverty initiative in the world”

20

Page 21: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The de Soto thesis:documents and document systems are mechanisms for creating the institutional orders of modern societies

The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else,

New York: Basic Books, 200021

Page 22: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

With the invention of documented claims and obligations

• a new dimension of socio-economic reality comes into existence:

bank accounts, stocks, shares, bonds, mortgages, credit cards

• form enduring social networks – document systems – of entirely new types

• debts become information entities analogous to computer software artifacts

22

Page 23: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Hernando de Soto

• first recognized the pivotal role of documents in the ontology of socio-economic reality.

• documents enable – new types of distributed ownership through stocks,

shares, pensions – new types of legal accountability– new types of business organization

23

Page 24: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Scope of document act theory

• the social and institutional (deontic, quasi-legal) powers of documents

• the sorts of things we can do with documents

• the social interactions in which documents play an essential role

• the enduring institutional systems to which documents belong

24

Page 25: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Basic distinctions

– document as stand-alone entity vs. document with all its different types of proximate and remote attachments

– document template vs. filled-in document

– document vs. the piece of paper upon which it is written/printed

– authentic documents vs. copies, forgeries

– allographic vs. autographic entities

25

Page 26: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

What happens when you sign your passport?

• you initiate the validity of the passport

• you attest to the truth of the assertions it contains (autographic)

• you provide a sample pattern for comparison (allographic)

Three document acts for the price of one

26

Page 27: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Passport acts

• I use my passport to prove my identity

• You use my passport to check my identity

• He renews my passport

• They confiscate my passport to initiate my renunciation of my citizenship

27

Page 28: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The creative power of documents

title deeds create property

stock and share certificates create capital

examination documents create PhDs

marriage licenses create bonds of matrimony

bankruptcy certificates create bankrupts

statutes of incorporation create business organizations

charters create universities, cities, guilds

28

Page 29: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The creative power of documentsinsurance certificates treatiespatents licensessummonsesmembership cardsdivorce decreesedicts of parliament

29

Page 30: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The creative power of documentsdocuments create authorities(physician’s license creates physician)

authorities create documents(physician creates sick note)

documents issued by an authority within the framework of a valid legal institution

vs. documents issued by an authority extralegally on its own behalf (cf. US Declaration of Independence)

30

Page 31: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Identity documents

• create identity (and thereby create the possibility of identity theft)

• what is the ontology of identity?

• what is the epistemology of identity (of the technologies of identification)?

31

Page 32: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Hernando de SotoInstitute for Liberty and Democracy, Lima, Peru

Bill Clinton: “The most promising anti-poverty initiative in the world”

32

Page 33: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

In Africa: the realm of extra-legal (spontaneously created) law

• In Tanzania, villages are relatively isolated from the influences of big-city law

• but this does not mean that they are free of legal-commercial activities and of associated institutions

• and of rudimentary documents

33

Page 34: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

MwenyekitiThe Mwenyekiti (or democratically elected village chairman)

34

Page 35: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

identification

Document in which a Mwenyekiti from the Kibaha area certifies the identity of an individual from his village. Both photograph and signature are authenticated with an official stamp.

35

Page 36: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

identification

Marks used to identify ownership of the cattle at an auction market in Dodoma.The cattle identification by branding serves as the basis for a formal pledge system.

36

Page 37: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

adjudication

Elders engaged in dispute resolution in Kisongo (Tanzania) dealing with conflicts about family matters, parcel boundaries and other property issues. Evidence is brought from witnesses and community members.

37

Page 38: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Documentation of the resolution of a dispute over land in the Arusha area and of the property rights thereby established.A council of notable elders is selected as judges and they follow established rules for the hearing, for presenting and processing evidence before the community. 38

Page 39: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

property right

• The difference between a piece of land and property is that property can be set out in a written document with determinate meaning. This document creates and establishes the right, which ties owner to physical asset in an enduring way.

• The system of such documents creates a new abstract order

39

Page 40: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

registrationThe Mwenyekitikeeps records of births deaths, contracts ..., provides written and unwritten proof of customary rights of occupancy, participates in real estate transactions as witness

40

Page 41: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

registration

• registration makes documents permanently accessible, providing in one single source records of the information required to know who owns what

• without this information, the combination and mobilization of assets is risky, and it is impossible to apply legal provisions against fraud and theft.

41

Page 42: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

registration

42

Page 43: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

registration

• Paper documents serve as filaments that bind different elements of social and institutional reality in a way which leads to the creation of new types of value.

• A network of social relations is created by the network of cross-referenced and cross-attached documents. In this way, the registry of documents forms a mirror of the network of legal and property relationships.

43

Page 44: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Anchoring to reality

44

Page 45: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Anchoring• a photograph alone is not sufficient to establish your

identity: it must appear in the right place in the right sort of document that has been marked in the right sort of way by signatures, counter-signatures, stamps, ID numbers

45

Page 46: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

fingerprint

official stamp

photograph

bar code

cow brand-mark

car license plate

allow cross-referencing to documents

Anchoring

46

Page 47: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The Mystery of Capital

when you have legal title to your house you can

• use your house as an address for receiving public utility services such as mail and electricity

• buy insurance on your house

• use your house as collateral on a loan – your house allows you to live in it and at the same time use its value to build a factory

Page 48: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

But what happens when it all breaks down?

48

Page 49: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

• picture of a Florida beach condo

49

Page 50: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The story of what happens

• In 2007, a bank in Florida lends you $1 million

• You buy a beach condo for $1 million

• In 2008, the value of your condo collapses: you owe the bank $1 million but your condo is worth only $500,000

• You walk away from the loan and give the keys back to the bank

50

Page 51: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

What sorts of entities are involved in this story?

• The bank (?)• The condo, the keys• The price you paid in 2007• The price you could get in 2008• Your mortgage contract (?)• Your signature on the mortgage contract (?)• Your mortgage (pre-default)• Your commitment to repay the mortgage• The same mortgage (post-default)

51

Page 52: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Basic Formal Ontology

Continuant Occurrent

process, eventIndependentContinuant

thing

DependentContinuant

quality, role,…

.... ..... .......52

Page 53: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The occurrent story

• In 2007, a bank in Florida lends you $1 million

• You buy a beach condo for $1 million

• In 2008, the value of your condo collapses: you owe the bank $1 million but your condo is worth only $500,000

• You walk away from the loan and give the keys back to the bank

53

Page 54: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

the dependent and independent continuants involved in this story

• The bank• The condo, the keys• The price you paid in 2007• The price you could get in 2008• Your mortgage contract• Your signature on the mortgage contract• Your mortgage (pre-default)• Your commitment to repay the mortgage• The same mortgage (post-default)

54

Page 55: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The aftermath

• Your mortgage was bundled with 100s of other mortgages to form a collateralized debt obligation (CDO)

• which was sold to investors

• Some CDOs were bundled to form CDO2s, CDO3s, ... CDOns.

• In 2008 this whole family of investment vehicles collapsed in value

55

Page 56: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Basic Formal Ontology

Continuant Occurrent

process, eventIndependentContinuant

thing

DependentContinuant

quality, role,…

.... ..... .......56

Page 57: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

ContinuantOccurrent

IndependentContinuant

Specifically DependentContinuant

Quality

Realization

Role

Page 58: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

What is a CDO?

On the one hand it is something like a mathematical structure.

Yet its existence is tied to time and change.

Plato would have regarded such a combination of properties as something impossible.

58

Page 59: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The ontology of the CDO

• CDOs seem to fall outside the standard philosophical dichotomies of – physical vs. mental– concrete vs. abstract– ens rationis vs. ens realis

• They are in some sense normative entities (‘obligations’), that can be bought and sold, aggregated and stored, spliced and diced, engineered and re-engineered

59

Page 60: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The ontology of toxic assets

• In 2007, I bundle your mortgage with 100s of other mortgages and sell the result – a ‘collateralized debt obligation’ (CDO) – to investors.

• This first CDO is supported directly by mortgages

• It is bundled with 100s of other CDOs to create a CDO2, backed not by mortgages, but by other CDOs

• ... and so on, with CDO3, ... CDOn, ad indefinitum

60

Page 61: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

More ontological questions• What is a CDO?• A pattern of blips on computers? Can you buy and sell a pattern of blips?• Is it made of molecules? Can it stand in physical

relations of cause and effect?

No; It is more like a mathematical structure.

Yet its existence is tied to time and change.

Already Plato would have regarded such a combination of properties as something impossible.

61

Page 62: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

The ontology of the CDO

• CDOs seem to fall outside the standard philosophical dichotomies of – physical vs. mental– concrete vs. abstract– entia rationis vs. entia realis.

• They are in some sense normative entities (‘obligations’), that can be bought and sold, aggregated and stored, spliced and diced, engineered and re-engineered

62

Page 63: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

63

Page 64: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

ContinuantOccurrent

IndependentContinuant

Specifically DependentContinuant

Quality Role

Page 65: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

CODA: The ontology of (credit card) numbers

• These numbers are not mathematical (not informational) entities – they are ‘thick’ (historical) numbers, special sorts of cultural artefacts– they are information objects with provenance:

abstract keys fitting into a globally distributed lock

65

Page 66: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

ContinuantOccurrent

IndependentContinuant

Specifically DependentContinuant

Quality Role

GenericallyDependentContinuant

Page 67: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

– not a mathematical object

– not a contingent object with physical properties, taking part in causal relations

– but a historical object, with a very special provenance, relations analogous to those of ownership, existing only within a nexus of working financial institutions of specific kinds

What is a credit card number?

67

Page 68: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Information vs. Information Artifact

‘information’ – mass noun (Shannon and Weaver)

‘information artifact’ – count noun (Information Artifact Ontology)

68

Page 69: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Information Artifacts in Science

protocoldatabasetheoryontology gene listpublicationresult...

69

Page 70: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Information Entity (labeling)

serial numberbatch numbergrant numberperson numbernameaddressemail addressURL...

70

Page 71: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Generically Dependent Continuants

GenericallyDependentContinuant

Information Entity

Sequence

if one bearer ceases to exist, then the entity can survive, because there are other bearers (copyability)

the pdf file on my laptop

the DNA (sequence) in this chromosome

71

Page 72: Ontology of Documents, Tokyo, February 2011

Information Artifact Ontology

http://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology/

72


Recommended