37
NAICS 3222 Converted Paper Product Manufacturing Exclusive Commentary from Dr. Joe Webb and Richard Romano 1
NAICS 3222
Converted Paper
Product Manufacturing
Exclusive Commentary from Dr. Joe Webb and Richard Romano
1
NAICS 3222
Exclusive Commentary
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing
[NAICS 3222]
This classification is a rollup that includes a number of sub-NAICS categories, including Paperboard Container Manufacturing (NAICS 32221), Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing (NAICS 322211), Folding Paperboard Box Manufacturing (NAICS 322212), Other Paperboard Container Manufacturing (NAICS 322219), Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Bag Manufacturing (NAICS 32222), Stationery Product Manufacturing (NAICS 32223), Other Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 32229), Sanitary Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 322291), and All Other Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 322299). These individual product categories are covered separately in individual data and commentary sheets.
The Bureau of the Census definition for this business classification:
This industry group comprises establishments primarily engaged in converting paper or paperboard without manufacturing paper or paperboard.
The commentary below refers to the aggregate data. Each NAICS is covered in separate commentary and data sheets.
Geographic Distribution • California (9.8%), Ohio (7.4%), and Illinois (6.1%) are the three biggest states for
converted paper product manufacturers.
• This isn’t a business category that lends itself to a metro location; New York-Newark-Jersey City (5.4%), Chicago-Naperville-Elgin (5.2%), and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim (4.6%)are the top three metro areas for converted paper product manufacturers, such as they are.
• In general, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) are urbanized areas that have at least 50,000 people. Combined Statistical Areas (CSAs) are much larger metropolitan population regions that include MSAs as well as associated bordering areas. For more details, please refer to the “Key Terms and Definitions” beginning on page 10 of this report.
• The top combined statistical areas (CSAs) are:
Combined Statistical Area New York Los Angeles % of All Establishments 6.6% 6.1%
Establishments 247 228
Employees 11,677 11,536
Payroll $653 Million $661 Million
Sales $4.9 Billion $4.7 Billion
Capital Expenditures $114 Million $122 Million
2
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued) Demographics Establishments
• In 2015, there were 3,757 U.S. converted paper product manufacturers.
From 2013 to 2015, converted paper product manufacturing establishments declined by -4.8%.
• Since 2010, establishments in this category have declined by -9.0%.
• From 2014 to 2015, establishments declined by -1.4%.
Establishments in the 5- to 9-employee range declined by -10.4%.
Only establishments in the 50- to 99-employee range have grown significantly (+3.5% from 2014 to 2015).
Employees • In 2015, there were a total of 245,334 employees in converted paper product
manufacturers.
• Overall employment is down -3.2% since 2010.
• From 2014 to 2015, employment has been flat.
Employment in the 5- to 9-employee range dropped -12.6% from 2014 to 2015.
• On the other hand, payroll has been up;
From 2014 to 2015 it grew +3.1%, almost exclusively among very large establishments.
Since 2010, payroll in converted paper manufacturers grew +12.4%.
Revenues/Value of Shipments • In 2015, converted paper product manufacturers reported revenues of $105.1 billion.
• Large manufacturers accounted for 87% of revenues; small manufacturers 1% of revenues.
• Regionally, converted paper product manufacturers in the Great Lakes region accounted for almost one-third (31.0%) of revenues, likely having to do with the proximity to North American paper production.
Capital Expenditures • In 2015, converted paper product manufacturers spent $2.5 billion on capital
expenditures.
88% of those outlays were by large (50+-employee) establishments, 11% by mid-size establishments, and only 1% by small establishments.
3
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued)
Technology Impacts and Competitive Trends Specific trends vary according to creative market:
Corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing:
• Software prototyping of packaging such as boxes results in better, more efficient, and innovative designs.
New box designs and configurations can optimize logistics of transporting packages, especially from overseas manufacturers.
• Environmental concerns becoming more important in box conversion.
Environmental benefits are often the byproduct of more efficient and lower-cost manufacturing techniques (i.e., reducing water consumption).
• Ecommerce driving demand for more and newer types of corrugated boxes.
Change in demand for different sizes—shipped to consumer vs. shipped to retailer.
Distinction between “for retail” (intended for store shelves to help sell the product) and “for ecommerce” packaging materials (intended for product protection through shipping).
• Ecommerce packaging does not require eye-catching graphics.
Rengo Gemini Packaging System —used by Amazon, among other mail-order and ecommerce sites—automatically adjusts the height of boxes according to the merchandise being ordered/shipped.
• Digital inkjet corrugated printing systems were “the big thing” at drupa 2016.
Increase in number of stock-keeping units (SKUs) and other “customization” and versioning trends reducing run lengths of corrugated materials.
Digital devices also ideal for hard prototyping (vs. software prototyping).
• “Smart packaging”—which incorporates some kind of often electronic functionality—on the rise.
Packaging Digest identifies two kinds of smart packaging:
• “Active packaging” offers capabilities such as moisture control.
• “Intelligent packaging” offers capabilities that indicate status or environmental/product changes—such as whether a temperature change has taken place (vital in pharmaceutical and food shipping).
Smart packaging now has its own new association: the Active & Intelligent Packaging Industry Association (AIPIA).
• Packaging also making increased use of Quick Response (QR) codes and other smartphone-scannable graphics, which requires higher-quality printing and, therefore, corrugated surfaces.
4
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued) Competitive Trends
• According to 2014 research by Smithers Pira, demand for corrugated packaging has been increasing by more than 4% annually and is expected to amount to almost 115 million tons worth an estimated $176 billion by 2019.
• Manufacturers looking to reduce shipping/transportation weights/costs.
Turning to lighter weight boxes.
In Western Europe, finished board weights have been reduced by an average of 5 gsm, according to data from FEFCO.
On the other hand, heavier corrugated material can replace wooden crates, also helping reduce transportation costs.
• Retail-ready packaging (RRP) had been poised for substantial growth—although the current slump in retail may adversely impact demand.
• New liner technologies improve reproduction of graphics on retail-ready packages and associated point-of-sale (POS) materials.
Folding paperboard box manufacturing:
• Migration of chemicals and other materials through paperboard/cardboard has been identified as a serious concern for food and pharmaceutical packaging.
Increased emphasis on anti-migration barriers and other technologies to reduce/eliminate contamination.
• Digital printing of cartons is becoming common.
Accompanied by laser die-cutting to handle shorter runs.
Growth of small boutique and craft businesses—such as microbreweries—fueling demand for high-quality, shorter-run packaging materials.
• Ecommerce driving demand for more and newer types of cartons.
Change in demand for different sizes—shipped to consumer vs. shipped to retailer.
Distinction between “for retail” and “for ecommerce” packaging materials.
• As in corrugated packaging, “smart packaging”—which incorporates some kind of often electronic functionality—on the rise on folding cartons.
Packaging Digest identifies two kinds of smart packaging:
• “Active packaging” offers capabilities such as moisture control.
• “Intelligent packaging” offers capabilities that indicate status or environmental/product changes—such as whether a temperature change has taken place (vital in pharmaceutical and food shipping).
Smart packaging now has its own new association: the Active & Intelligent Packaging Industry Association (AIPIA).
• Folding cartons also making increased use of Quick Response (QR) codes and other smartphone-scannable graphics, which requires higher-quality printing and, therefore, corrugated surfaces.
5
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued) • Specialty enhancements for retail-ready cartons—like 3D, lenticular imaging, “digital
embellishments” (a la Scodfix or MGI)—also becoming important differentiators in retail environments.
Ultraviolet (UV) and electron beam (EB) coatings and other effects also important elements for folding cartons.
• “Unboxing”—recording the removal of a new product (like a video game) from a package and posting it on social media—is a trend. Packaging needs to be ready for its close-up.
• According to Smithers Pira research, healthcare and tobacco products (an ironic combination) are the two largest uses of folding cartons.
Dry and frozen foods also major product categories.
• Manufacturers are striving to reduce overall amount of packaging for a given product.
For reasons of both cost reduction and environmental sustainability.
• Growth of single-person households—especially in Europe—is driving demand for single-serving food packages.
• Introduction off digital printing and “simplified” production allows traditional commercial printers to enter into packaging printing/decoration market.
Barriers to entry still include brand trust, navigating regulatory issues, especially with regard to food and drug packaging.
Other paperboard container manufacturing:
• Products includes in this category include:
Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard.
Milk cartons.
Sanitary food containers.
Egg cartons.
• Liquid packaging market is a substantial one.
I.e., water, soft drinks, dairy products, and fruit juices.
Single-serve, “grab-and-go” liquid cartons and containers driven by lifestyle/convenience trends.
• Paperboard cartons for liquid packaging face competition for various types of plastics, like PET.
• Top concerns for paperboard cartons esp. in food/liquid packaging is migration of chemicals and other materials.
• Food preservation top concern.
• Recyclability of food/liquid cartons is becoming of chief importance.
• These packages tend to be retail-ready vs. ecommerce type.
Brands utilize innovative designs/graphics to attract consumers.
• Functionality of these cartons is also important.
I.e., ease of opening for older consumers.
6
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued)
Paper bag and coated and treated paper manufacturing:
• Paper bags can be categorized in two ways.1
By type of bag. For example:
• “Block bottom” paper bags
• Paper carry bags
• Checkout paper bags
• Confectionary paper bags
By intended contents (application). For example:
• Foods
• Pharmaceuticals
• Customer goods
• Cosmetics and personal use products
• Home care products
“Paper vs. plastic” consideration anecdotally works in paper’s favor.
More and more municipalities banning plastic bags.
Paper bags easily recycled.
Growth of reusable bags making this conversation moot.
• Trends in retail trickle down to affect carry bag demand.
Still demand for niche/boutique bags.
Digital printing can eliminate the “blank bag.”
• Laminates and other types of coatings—plastics, foils, etc.—increase strength, aesthetic appeal, but may adversely impact recyclability.
Stationery product manufacturing:
• Said Stationery Trends magazine:2
“There is a strong resurgence in consumers’ passion for stationery and specialty paper products. From journals to cards to prints, the written word and personal sentiments are returning stronger than ever—and in new ways.”
Heavy cardstock, letterpress, lithography, and laser printing are top trends in stationery and greeting cards.
• Traditional print greeting cards are still fairly strong.
According to the Greeting Card Association (GCA, which does an annual survey with Stationery Trends magazine), women 25–44 are the top demographic for greeting cards.
LEDs, audio, and other electronic/rich media elements have made their way into printed greeting cards.
The GCA has also been tracking a heightened interest in hand-lettered greeting cards, unique shapes, foils, and other special effects.
Ecards have not taken off, despite a strong push by Hallmark and others a decade or so ago.
———————————————————————————————————————————
1 http://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/paper-bags-market
2 http://stationerytrends.com/news/whats-trending-in-stationery/
7
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued) Christmas cards are increasingly customized/personalized, featuring the sender’s
family and printed via digital print services such as Shutterfly.
• For stationery, “foil, embossing, and vibrant colors are must-haves in the stationery scene, accompanied by a little 1950s to 1960s nostalgia,” says Stationery Trends magazine.
• For journals and diaries: “Recycled paper, beautiful binding, leather that features hand detail are trending design elements.”
Journals with unique uses also stand out, from blank journals, to travel diaries, self-exploration journals, and journals that track family memories are trending subjects.
For fitness buffs, “workout diaries” (“WODBooks”) are also popular items.
The classic Moleskine notebook has had a resurgence, and pictures of note-filled Moleskines are shared on social media.3
• Stationery Trends also identifies that letterpress printing—especially art prints and posters—are becoming popular again.
• Essentially, “hand-crafted” is the watchword in this product category.
We suspect many of these “makers” may not be reflected in Census data, as they tend to be individual artisans or hobbyists.
Sanitary paper product manufacturing:
• The sanitary paper product market is a mature one, with few truly new products coming to market and few avenues for growth.4
• Products are broadly divided into “consumer” and “commercial and industrial,” the latter of which is intended for schools, hospitals, or offices.
These products tend to be “non-discretionary,” in that there is very little that will stimulate (or depress) usage/sales.
• Save for a particularly bad cold/flu/allergy season, perhaps.
The adult incontinence product category is perhaps the most recent new product category.
• This market depends on population demographics, which currently favor growth.
• A baby boom would favor growth at the other end of the incontinence spectrum.
• Branding and marketing are vital for stimulating sales, since little can be done to drive overall demand, just brand reallocation.
Competition can also be quite fierce.
Overseas and “developing” markets are seen as the biggest opportunities for growth.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
3 David Sax, The Revenge of Analog, New York: PublicAffairs, 2016, p. 38
4 https://business.highbeam.com/industry-reports/wood/sanitary-paper-products
8
NAICS 3222
Commentary (continued)
• Lowering production costs is also a vital strategy for manufacturers in this category.
• The industry also tends to be highly integrated, so the major companies that manufacture the raw materials also covert those into the final products.
• Small changes in these categories can have substantial environmental impacts.
UK supermarket chain Sainsbury reduced the width of a toilet paper roll by 11mm, allowing more rolls to be fit into a delivery van and eliminating 500 van trips a year—saving 140 tons of CO2 annually in reduced transport and materials.5
All other converted paper product manufacturing:
• This product category largely comprises food trays, egg cartons, and similar materials.
Trends in this packaging category will depend upon trends in the types of food they contain.
• For example, in the case of egg cartons, egg consumption is increasing and creative egg packaging is an uncracked market, says the American Egg Board.6
Different birds—hens vs. ducks vs. ostriches—lay different size eggs, which packaging needs to accommodate.
Opportunity exists for better egg carton design.
The AEB advises against using images of cooked eggs to avoid “alienating” consumers who dislike a particular egg preparation method (scrambled vs. sunny side up, e.g.).
• Competition from foam-based food trays and cartons is substantial.
Cushioning, cost-effectiveness, and moisture-impermeability work in foam’s favor.
Biodegradability/sustainability works in paper-based trays’/carton’ favor.
• There is increased demand for food trays/packaging (take-out, restaurant leftovers, school and cafeteria use, etc., e.g.), but is moving in foam’s direction.
• Increase of municipal bans on foam takeout containers can work to paper’s advantage.7
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
5 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/20/sainsburys-toilet-roll-carbon-emissions
6 http://www.aeb.org/retail/consumer-trends/33-retailers
7 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/12/ban-polystyrene-foam-containers/1761145/
9
NAICS 3222
Key Terms and Definitions
Annual Survey of Manufactures (Source) - The Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) provides key intercensal measures of manufacturing activity, products, and
location for the public and private sectors. The ASM provides the best measure of current U.S. manufacturing industry
outputs, inputs, operating status, and is the primary basis for updates of the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD). Census
Bureau staff and academic researchers use the LRD for micro data analysis.
Statistics are available on a sample universe of manufacturing establishments with one or more paid employees at any time
during the year for manufacturing classified in NAICS sectors 31–33. Employment, payroll, hours, cost of materials, receipts,
value added, capital expenditures, and relative standard errors data are available for the U.S. and states at the 2- through 4-
digit NAICS levels. Product shipments value data are available at the 6-digit North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) level and 7-digit NAICS product class levels based on NAICS.
The ASM is conducted annually, except for years ending in 2 and 7, at which time ASM data are included in the manufacturing
sector of the Economic Census.
Consolidated (or Combined) Statistical Area (CSA) - Consolidated Statistical Areas are a combination of metropolitan areas that have significant economic interaction and
dependency. PrintStats includes the top five CSAs in each report based on total population, without regard to the number of
industry establishments. These CSAs are very large, and in fact, larger than many countries. These are the details of their
composition:
• New York CSA is the combination of these Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas: New York-Newark-
Jersey City, Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, New Haven-Milford, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Trenton,
Torrington, Kingston, East Stroudsburg
• Los Angeles CSA includes: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Oxnard-
Thousand Oaks-Ventura
• Chicago CSA includes: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ottawa-Peru, Kankakee, Michigan City-La Porte
• Washington D.C. CSA includes: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Baltimore-Columbia-
Towson, Hagerstown-Martinsburg, Chambersburg-Waynesboro, Winchester, California-Lexington Park, Easton,
Cambridge
• San Francisco CSA includes: San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Stockton-Lodi,
Santa Rosa, Vallejo-Fairfield, Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Napa
(see also Metropolitan Statistical Area)
Content Creation (Source) - The contribution of information to any medium/media, especially to digital media for an end-user/audience in specific
contexts. “Content” can be text, photographic images, illustrations, graphic design, video, or any other intellectual property.
Typical forms of modern content creation include maintaining and updating web sites, blogging, photography, videography,
online commentary, the maintenance of social media accounts, and editing and distribution of digital media.
County Business Patterns [CBP] (Source) - CBP is an annual series that provides subnational economic data by industry. This series includes the number of
establishments, employment during the week of March 12, first quarter payroll, and annual payroll.
10
NAICS 3222
Key Terms and Definitions (continued)
Demographics (Source) - The statistical characteristics of human populations (such as age or income) used especially to identify markets. In business, a
particular market or segment of the population.
Economic Census (Source) - The Economic Census is the U.S. Government's official five-year measure of American business and the economy. It is
conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, and response is required by law.
Employee (Source) - An individual hired by another individual or business usually for wages or salary and in a position below the executive level.
Establishment (Source) - An establishment is a single physical location at which business is conducted or where services or industrial operations are
performed. It is not necessarily identical with a company or enterprise, which may consist of one or more establishments.
Estimate (Source) - A value that is usable for some purpose even if input data may be incomplete, uncertain, or unstable. The value is nonetheless
usable because it is derived from the best information available. Typically, deriving an estimate involves using the value of a
statistic derived from a sample to estimate the value of a corresponding population parameter. The sample provides
information that can be projected, through various formal or informal processes, to determine a range most likely to describe
the missing information.
Forecast (Source) - Forecasting is the use of historic data to determine the direction of future trends. Businesses use forecasting to determine
how to allocate their budgets or plan for anticipated expenses for an upcoming period of time. This is typically based on the
projected demand for the goods and services they offer.
In terms of PrintStats, the forecasts are limited to statistical trends based on past statistical data. They are not forecasts based
on industry surveys or assessment of economic, social, or technological changes. The PrintStats forecast data should be
viewed only as a starting point for a formal forecast process.
M3 Manufacturing Survey (Source) - The Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders (M3) survey provides broad-based, monthly statistical data on
economic conditions in the domestic manufacturing sector. The survey measures current industrial activity and provides an
indication of future business trends.
Metropolitan Area (Source) - A metropolitan area, sometimes referred to as a metro area or commuter belt, is a region consisting of a densely populated
urban core and its less-populated surrounding territories, sharing industry, infrastructure, and housing. A metro area usually
comprises multiple jurisdictions and municipalities: neighborhoods, townships, boroughs, cities, towns, exurbs, suburbs,
counties, districts, states, and even nations like the eurodistricts. As social, economic, and political institutions have changed,
metropolitan areas have become key economic and political regions. Metropolitan areas include one or more urban areas, as
well as satellite cities, towns, and intervening rural areas that are socio-economically tied to the urban core, typically
measured by commuting patterns.
11
NAICS 3222
Key Terms and Definitions (continued)
Metropolitan Statistical Area [MSA] (Source) - In the United States, a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is a geographical region with a relatively high population density at
its core and close economic ties throughout the area. Such regions are neither legally incorporated as a city or town would
be, nor are they legal administrative divisions like counties or separate entities such as states. As such, the precise definition
of any given metropolitan area can vary with the source. A typical metropolitan area is centered on a single large city that
wields substantial influence over the region (e.g., Chicago or Atlanta). However, some metropolitan areas contain more than
one large city with no single municipality holding a substantially dominant position (e.g., Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex,
Norfolk-Virginia Beach [Hampton Roads], Riverside–San Bernardino [Inland Empire], or Minneapolis–Saint Paul).
MSAs are defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and used by the Census Bureau and other Federal
government agencies for statistical purposes.
(See also Consolidated Statistical Area)
NAICS (Source) - The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying
business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business
economy.
Nonemployer Statistics (Source) - Nonemployer Statistics is an annual series that provides subnational economic data for businesses that have no paid
employees and are subject to Federal income tax. The data consist of the number of businesses and total receipts by industry.
Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals operating unincorporated businesses (known as sole proprietorships),
which may or may not be the owner's principal source of income.
The majority of all business establishments in the United States are nonemployers, yet these firms average less than 4
percent of all sales and receipts nationally. Due to their small economic impact, these firms are excluded from most other
Census Bureau business statistics (the primary exception being the Survey of Business Owners). The Nonemployers Statistics
series is the primary resource available to study the scope and activities of nonemployers at a detailed geographic level. For
complementary statistics on the firms that do have paid employees, refer to the County Business Patterns. Additional sources
of data on small businesses include the Economic Census, and the Statistics of U.S. Businesses.
Packaging (Source) - Packaging is the technology of enclosing or protecting products for distribution, storage, sale, and use. Packaging also refers
to the process of designing, evaluating, and producing packages. Packaging can be described as a coordinated system of
preparing goods for transport, warehousing, logistics, sale, and end use. In the graphic arts, packaging refers to the design,
manufacturing, and decoration (usually via printing and related technologies) of corrugated paperboard containers, folding
cardboard cartons and containers, paper bags, flexible plastic packaging, and other paper, paperboard, and plastic materials.
Payroll (Source) - Payroll is the sum total of all compensation a business must pay to its employees for a set period of time or on a given date.
Payroll is reported before deductions for social security, income tax, insurance, union dues, etc. This definition of payroll is
the same as that used by the Internal Revenue Service.
12
NAICS 3222
Key Terms and Definitions (continued)
Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages [QCEW] (Source) - The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program publishes a quarterly count of employment and wages
reported by employers covering more than 95 percent of U.S. jobs, available at the county, MSA, state, and national levels by
industry.
Quarterly Services Survey (Source) - The Quarterly Services Survey (QSS) is the only source of service industry indicator performance providing timely estimates
of revenue and expenses for selected service industries. The QSS is a principal economic indicator series that produces, for
selected service industries, quarterly estimates of total operating revenue and the percentage of revenue by class of
customer (government, business, consumers, and individuals). The survey also produces estimates of total operating
expenses from tax-exempt firms in industries that have a large not-for-profit component. In addition, for hospital services,
the survey estimates the number of inpatient days and discharges.
Region (Source) - Census Regions are groupings of states and the District of Columbia that subdivide the United States for the presentation of
Census data. There are four Census regions—Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Each of the four Census regions is
divided into two or more Census divisions. Each Census region is identified by a single-digit Census code. Puerto Rico and
the Island Areas are not part of any Census region or Census division.
PrintStats uses eight regions based on industrial economic activity rather than the Census regions. The 50 U.S. states and
District of Columbia are allocated as follows:
• New England: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
• Mid-Eastern: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia
• South Eastern: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Virginia
• Great Lakes: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
• North Central: Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming
• South Central: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas
• South Western: Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah
• Western: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington
13
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222)
Baseline data from County Business Patterns
This workbook contains the following datasheets (click to open)
Establishments 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Establishments 2013 (Summarized Size Classes)Establishments 2015 Changes (Summarized Size Classes)Establishments 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Establishments 2013 (Detailed Size Classes)Establishments 2015 Changes (Detailed Size Classes)Employees 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Employees 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Payrolls 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Payrolls 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Sales 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Sales 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Capital Expenditures 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Capital Expenditures 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Top 15 States 2015 Top 25 Metros 2015 Top 5 Major Metropolitan Areas (Combined Statistical Areas)Estimates and Statistical Trend 2016-2022
email: [email protected]
Produced exclusively for NPESCopyright 2017, Non-Routine LLC and Strategies for Management, Inc.
14
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
Avg. Employees/
Estab.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 3,757 852 1,382 1,523 65.3
New England 5.5% 6 207 55 85 67 50.1 Connecticut 1.2% 24 44 10 19 15 37.3 Maine 0.2% 41 9 1 2 6 146.1 Massachusetts 2.8% 15 106 28 43 35 55.6 New Hampshire 0.5% 37 18 5 10 3 29.9 Rhode Island 0.8% 33 29 11 10 8 32.5 Vermont 0.0% 47 1 1 34.0
Mid-Eastern 15.5% 3 581 148 224 209 62.1 Delaware 0.1% 44 5 3 2 34.4 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 30 31 6 15 10 64.6 New Jersey 3.6% 9 137 40 51 46 47.9 New York 5.2% 6 195 61 76 58 52.1 Pennsylvania 5.5% 5 207 36 80 91 82.7 West Virginia 0.2% 43 6 2 2 2 11.3
South Eastern 20.9% 2 786 154 263 369 70.0 Alabama 1.1% 26 43 4 14 25 67.0 Florida 2.9% 14 109 43 39 27 40.0 Georgia 3.0% 13 114 19 42 53 74.4 Kentucky 1.8% 20 67 8 26 33 100.0 Mississippi 1.2% 22 46 11 16 19 48.9 North Carolina 4.0% 8 151 15 45 91 87.5 South Carolina 1.7% 21 64 13 22 29 66.1 Tennessee 3.2% 11 120 22 35 63 74.4 Virginia 1.9% 18 72 19 24 29 55.6
Great Lakes 27.6% 1 1,036 204 388 444 72.0 Illinois 6.1% 3 231 49 82 100 72.2 Indiana 3.1% 12 118 18 42 58 72.6 Michigan 3.5% 10 131 29 51 51 61.0 Minnesota 2.5% 17 95 25 33 37 77.6 Ohio 7.4% 2 279 56 113 110 57.8 Wisconsin 4.8% 7 182 27 67 88 98.0
North Central 5.4% 7 204 36 78 90 70.6 Idaho 0.2% 42 8 2 3 3 61.8 Iowa 1.2% 24 44 5 16 23 80.3 Kansas 0.6% 35 21 6 6 9 64.0 Missouri 2.7% 16 100 18 43 39 69.8 Montana 0.0% 47 1 1 33.0 Nebraska 0.4% 38 15 5 10 83.1 North Dakota 0.1% 45 3 2 1 26.3 South Dakota 0.3% 39 11 2 4 5 62.4 Wyoming 0.0% 47 1 1 2.0
South Central 8.8% 5 330 85 117 128 64.5 Arkansas 1.2% 22 46 6 17 23 111.1 Louisiana 1.0% 28 37 6 14 17 65.6 Oklahoma 0.7% 34 28 9 8 11 56.1 Texas 5.8% 4 219 64 78 77 55.6
South Western 3.4% 8 128 41 50 37 50.7 Arizona 0.8% 30 31 6 14 11 54.8 Colorado 1.0% 29 36 13 14 9 32.6 Nevada 0.5% 36 20 9 6 5 44.2 New Mexico 0.3% 40 10 5 3 2 31.3 Utah 0.8% 30 31 8 13 10 78.1
Western 12.9% 4 485 129 177 179 52.8 Alaska 0.0% 47 1 1 7.0 California 9.8% 1 369 93 143 133 53.6 Hawaii 0.1% 45 3 3 3.0 Oregon 1.1% 27 40 15 13 12 43.3 Washington 1.9% 18 72 17 21 34 56.8
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of
Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Number of Establishments
15
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
Avg. Employees/
Estab.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 3,946 932 1,475 1,539 62.7
New England 5.5% 6 217 52 92 73 51.7 Connecticut 1.2% 23 49 10 22 17 41.6 Maine 0.2% 41 9 3 6 125.3 Massachusetts 2.9% 15 113 28 45 40 57.8 New Hampshire 0.5% 36 19 5 11 3 29.2 Rhode Island 0.6% 34 25 9 9 7 36.9 Vermont 0.1% 47 2 2 16.5
Mid-Eastern 15.6% 3 615 161 242 212 58.5 Delaware 0.1% 44 4 1 3 61.3 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 32 32 7 16 9 54.2 New Jersey 3.6% 9 142 40 56 46 45.6 New York 5.3% 6 208 66 77 65 50.4 Pennsylvania 5.6% 4 220 42 91 87 76.5 West Virginia 0.2% 41 9 5 2 2 22.4
South Eastern 21.0% 2 830 169 284 377 66.2 Alabama 1.2% 24 46 5 20 21 61.7 Florida 2.9% 13 114 39 47 28 33.9 Georgia 3.2% 12 126 19 43 64 75.2 Kentucky 1.9% 19 75 10 24 41 101.4 Mississippi 1.2% 24 46 9 18 19 57.8 North Carolina 4.0% 8 158 23 50 85 76.5 South Carolina 2.0% 18 77 18 23 36 64.5 Tennessee 2.9% 13 114 25 36 53 70.4 Virginia 1.9% 20 74 21 23 30 46.1
Great Lakes 27.7% 1 1,092 229 422 441 64.3 Illinois 6.0% 3 237 49 93 95 70.1 Indiana 3.5% 11 137 26 54 57 63.4 Michigan 3.5% 10 140 31 59 50 42.8 Minnesota 2.7% 16 106 30 35 41 46.4 Ohio 7.1% 2 280 57 116 107 57.2 Wisconsin 4.9% 7 192 36 65 91 93.8
North Central 5.2% 7 204 46 69 89 65.0 Idaho 0.2% 41 9 2 4 3 54.3 Iowa 1.1% 26 45 8 14 23 71.9 Kansas 0.5% 35 21 5 8 8 49.3 Missouri 2.4% 17 95 21 36 38 70.3 Montana 0.0% 49 1 1 33.0 Nebraska 0.4% 38 15 1 3 11 71.1 North Dakota 0.1% 45 3 2 1 27.3 South Dakota 0.3% 39 13 5 3 5 49.3 Wyoming 0.1% 47 2 2 0.5
South Central 8.6% 5 340 81 131 128 58.7 Arkansas 1.3% 22 52 5 25 22 97.5 Louisiana 1.0% 28 39 7 17 15 58.6 Oklahoma 0.8% 33 30 10 9 11 32.4 Texas 5.5% 5 219 59 80 80 53.2
South Western 3.5% 8 140 50 50 40 46.3 Arizona 0.9% 30 36 10 13 13 51.9 Colorado 1.0% 28 39 15 15 9 33.0 Nevada 0.5% 36 19 9 7 3 26.3 New Mexico 0.3% 39 13 7 4 2 22.2 Utah 0.8% 31 33 9 11 13 77.1
Western 12.9% 4 508 144 185 179 47.6 Alaska 0.0% 49 1 1 7.0 California 9.9% 1 389 104 150 135 49.4 Hawaii 0.1% 45 3 3 3.0 Oregon 1.1% 27 43 18 12 13 26.1 Washington 1.8% 21 72 18 23 31 53.2
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of
Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2013Number of Establishments
16
Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
Avg. Employees/
Estab.
U.S. states + DC - (189) (80) (93) (16) 2.6
New England 2 (10) 3 (7) (6) (1.6)Connecticut 9 (5) (3) (2) (4.3)Maine 5 1 (1) 20.8 Massachusetts 11 (7) (2) (5) (2.2)New Hampshire 6 (1) (1) 0.7 Rhode Island 3 4 2 1 1 (4.4)Vermont 7 (1) (1) 17.5
Mid-Eastern 5 (34) (13) (18) (3) 3.7 Delaware 4 1 2 (1) (26.9)Washington DC 6 Maryland 7 (1) (1) (1) 1 10.4 New Jersey 10 (5) (5) 2.4 New York 17 (13) (5) (1) (7) 1.8 Pennsylvania 18 (13) (6) (11) 4 6.2 West Virginia 8 (3) (3) (11.1)
South Eastern 6 (44) (15) (21) (8) 3.8 Alabama 9 (3) (1) (6) 4 5.3 Florida 10 (5) 4 (8) (1) 6.1 Georgia 16 (12) (1) (11) (0.9)Kentucky 12 (8) (2) 2 (8) (1.5)Mississippi 6 2 (2) (8.9)North Carolina 12 (7) (8) (5) 6 11.0 South Carolina 18 (13) (5) (1) (7) 1.6 Tennessee 1 6 (3) (1) 10 3.9 Virginia 7 (2) (2) 1 (1) 9.4
Great Lakes 7 (56) (25) (34) 3 7.7 Illinois 10 (6) (11) 5 2.1 Indiana 18 (19) (8) (12) 1 9.3 Michigan 13 (9) (2) (8) 1 18.2 Minnesota 15 (11) (5) (2) (4) 31.3 Ohio 7 (1) (1) (3) 3 0.6 Wisconsin 14 (10) (9) 2 (3) 4.2
North Central 1 (10) 9 1 5.6 Idaho 7 (1) (1) 7.4 Iowa 7 (1) (3) 2 8.4 Kansas 6 1 (2) 1 14.7 Missouri 2 5 (3) 7 1 (0.5)Montana 6 Nebraska 6 (1) 2 (1) 12.1 North Dakota 6 (1.0)South Dakota 8 (2) (3) 1 13.1 Wyoming 7 (1) (1) 1.5
South Central 3 (10) 4 (14) 5.8 Arkansas 11 (6) 1 (8) 1 13.6 Louisiana 8 (2) (1) (3) 2 7.0 Oklahoma 8 (2) (1) (1) 23.7 Texas 6 5 (2) (3) 2.5
South Western 3 (12) (9) (3) 4.4 Arizona 10 (5) (4) 1 (2) 2.9 Colorado 9 (3) (2) (1) (0.4)Nevada 5 1 (1) 2 17.9 New Mexico 9 (3) (2) (1) 9.1 Utah 8 (2) (1) 2 (3) 1.0
Western 4 (23) (15) (8) 5.2 Alaska 6 California 19 (20) (11) (7) (2) 4.2 Hawaii 6 Oregon 9 (3) (3) 1 (1) 17.1 Washington 6 (1) (2) 3 3.6
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Change in Number of
Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Change in Number of Establishments
17
% of TotalRegion Rank
and State Rank
All Sizes 1-4Empls.
5-9 Empls.
10-19Empls.
20-49Empls.
50-99Empls.
100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
Avg. Employees/
Estab.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 3,757 523 329 485 897 677 717 104 25 65.3
New England 5.5% 6 207 36 19 27 58 40 22 3 2 50.1 Connecticut 1.2% 24 44 7 3 10 9 12 3 37.3 Maine 0.2% 41 9 1 2 2 2 1 1 146.1 Massachusetts 2.8% 15 106 18 10 13 30 17 15 2 1 55.6 New Hampshire 0.5% 37 18 2 3 1 9 2 1 29.9 Rhode Island 0.8% 33 29 9 2 3 7 7 1 32.5 Vermont 0.0% 47 1 1 34.0
Mid-Eastern 15.5% 3 581 90 58 89 135 83 103 19 4 62.1 Delaware 0.1% 44 5 2 1 2 34.4 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 30 31 5 1 6 9 3 6 1 64.6 New Jersey 3.6% 9 137 31 9 22 29 21 24 1 47.9 New York 5.2% 6 195 34 27 36 40 23 30 4 1 52.1 Pennsylvania 5.5% 5 207 16 20 25 55 36 39 14 2 82.7 West Virginia 0.2% 43 6 2 2 2 11.3
South Eastern 20.9% 2 786 89 65 85 178 175 166 25 3 70.0 Alabama 1.1% 26 43 4 4 10 15 9 1 67.0 Florida 2.9% 14 109 32 11 18 21 13 12 2 40.0 Georgia 3.0% 13 114 6 13 11 31 26 23 3 1 74.4 Kentucky 1.8% 20 67 5 3 7 19 9 17 7 100.0 Mississippi 1.2% 22 46 7 4 4 12 13 6 48.9 North Carolina 4.0% 8 151 6 9 13 32 42 40 8 1 87.5 South Carolina 1.7% 21 64 9 4 5 17 15 12 2 66.1 Tennessee 3.2% 11 120 11 11 16 19 28 33 1 1 74.4 Virginia 1.9% 18 72 9 10 7 17 14 14 1 55.6
Great Lakes 27.6% 1 1,036 127 77 130 258 194 204 36 10 72.0 Illinois 6.1% 3 231 31 18 29 53 44 49 5 2 72.2 Indiana 3.1% 12 118 11 7 13 29 25 28 4 1 72.6 Michigan 3.5% 10 131 22 7 21 30 25 21 4 1 61.0 Minnesota 2.5% 17 95 13 12 9 24 11 22 3 1 77.6 Ohio 7.4% 2 279 34 22 40 73 54 50 5 1 57.8 Wisconsin 4.8% 7 182 16 11 18 49 35 34 15 4 98.0
North Central 5.4% 7 204 24 12 26 52 33 50 5 2 70.6 Idaho 0.2% 42 8 1 1 1 2 3 61.8 Iowa 1.2% 24 44 5 8 8 7 15 1 80.3 Kansas 0.6% 35 21 3 3 1 5 5 4 64.0 Missouri 2.7% 16 100 11 7 13 30 17 17 4 1 69.8 Montana 0.0% 47 1 1 33.0 Nebraska 0.4% 38 15 2 3 2 7 1 83.1 North Dakota 0.1% 45 3 1 1 1 26.3 South Dakota 0.3% 39 11 2 1 3 1 4 62.4 Wyoming 0.0% 47 1 1 2.0
South Central 8.8% 5 330 51 34 35 82 52 66 7 3 64.5 Arkansas 1.2% 22 46 5 1 5 12 6 12 4 1 111.1 Louisiana 1.0% 28 37 2 4 6 8 9 6 2 65.6 Oklahoma 0.7% 34 28 3 6 1 7 4 7 56.1 Texas 5.8% 4 219 41 23 23 55 33 41 1 2 55.6
South Western 3.4% 8 128 29 12 23 27 15 18 3 1 50.7 Arizona 0.8% 30 31 2 4 8 6 3 7 1 54.8 Colorado 1.0% 29 36 11 2 8 6 5 4 32.6 Nevada 0.5% 36 20 5 4 2 4 3 1 1 44.2 New Mexico 0.3% 40 10 3 2 2 1 1 1 31.3 Utah 0.8% 30 31 8 3 10 3 5 1 1 78.1
Western 12.9% 4 485 77 52 70 107 85 88 6 52.8 Alaska 0.0% 47 1 1 7.0 California 9.8% 1 369 56 37 54 89 61 66 6 53.6 Hawaii 0.1% 45 3 1 2 3.0 Oregon 1.1% 27 40 9 6 4 9 6 6 43.3 Washington 1.9% 18 72 11 6 12 9 18 16 56.8
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of
Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Number of Establishments
18
% of TotalRegion Rank
and State Rank
All Sizes 1-4Empls.
5-9 Empls.
10-19Empls.
20-49Empls.
50-99Empls.
100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
Avg. Employees/
Estab.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 3,946 569 363 529 946 710 696 108 25 62.7
New England 5.5% 6 217 33 19 29 63 42 25 5 1 51.7 Connecticut 1.2% 23 49 6 4 11 11 11 6 41.6 Maine 0.2% 41 9 3 3 1 2 125.3 Massachusetts 2.9% 15 113 20 8 14 31 21 15 3 1 57.8 New Hampshire 0.5% 36 19 3 2 2 9 2 1 29.2 Rhode Island 0.6% 34 25 4 5 2 7 5 2 36.9 Vermont 0.1% 47 2 2 16.5
Mid-Eastern 15.6% 3 615 94 67 99 143 94 96 16 6 58.5 Delaware 0.1% 44 4 1 1 2 61.3 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 32 32 6 1 5 11 3 5 1 54.2 New Jersey 3.6% 9 142 26 14 21 35 23 23 45.6 New York 5.3% 6 208 36 30 35 42 33 27 3 2 50.4 Pennsylvania 5.6% 4 220 23 19 37 54 34 37 13 3 76.5 West Virginia 0.2% 41 9 3 2 1 1 2 22.4
South Eastern 21.0% 2 830 103 66 85 199 168 175 30 4 66.2 Alabama 1.2% 24 46 3 2 3 17 9 11 1 61.7 Florida 2.9% 13 114 30 9 19 28 15 12 1 33.9 Georgia 3.2% 12 126 10 9 12 31 32 27 4 1 75.2 Kentucky 1.9% 19 75 7 3 7 17 14 20 5 2 101.4 Mississippi 1.2% 24 46 5 4 6 12 11 7 1 57.8 North Carolina 4.0% 8 158 11 12 17 33 33 43 9 76.5 South Carolina 2.0% 18 77 11 7 3 20 15 15 6 64.5 Tennessee 2.9% 13 114 13 12 12 24 24 27 1 1 70.4 Virginia 1.9% 20 74 13 8 6 17 15 13 2 46.1
Great Lakes 27.7% 1 1,092 135 94 145 277 210 190 32 9 64.3 Illinois 6.0% 3 237 27 22 31 62 44 44 4 3 70.1 Indiana 3.5% 11 137 12 14 18 36 29 24 4 63.4 Michigan 3.5% 10 140 19 12 22 37 28 20 2 42.8 Minnesota 2.7% 16 106 18 12 11 24 17 21 1 2 46.4 Ohio 7.1% 2 280 36 21 49 67 57 42 7 1 57.2 Wisconsin 4.9% 7 192 23 13 14 51 35 39 14 3 93.8
North Central 5.2% 7 204 27 19 24 45 30 52 5 2 65.0 Idaho 0.2% 41 9 2 3 1 3 54.3 Iowa 1.1% 26 45 3 5 5 9 7 15 1 71.9 Kansas 0.5% 35 21 4 1 2 6 5 3 49.3 Missouri 2.4% 17 95 13 8 12 24 13 19 5 1 70.3 Montana 0.0% 49 1 1 33.0 Nebraska 0.4% 38 15 1 1 2 3 8 71.1 North Dakota 0.1% 45 3 2 1 27.3 South Dakota 0.3% 39 13 3 2 1 2 1 4 49.3 Wyoming 0.1% 47 2 2 0.5
South Central 8.6% 5 340 49 32 40 91 54 61 11 2 58.7 Arkansas 1.3% 22 52 1 4 7 18 5 11 5 1 97.5 Louisiana 1.0% 28 39 5 2 6 11 6 7 2 58.6 Oklahoma 0.8% 33 30 6 4 1 8 5 6 32.4 Texas 5.5% 5 219 37 22 26 54 38 37 4 1 53.2
South Western 3.5% 8 140 37 13 27 23 18 18 3 1 46.3 Arizona 0.9% 30 36 6 4 8 5 5 7 1 51.9 Colorado 1.0% 28 39 13 2 8 7 6 3 33.0 Nevada 0.5% 36 19 6 3 3 4 2 1 26.3 New Mexico 0.3% 39 13 5 2 3 1 1 1 22.2 Utah 0.8% 31 33 7 2 5 6 4 6 2 1 77.1
Western 12.9% 4 508 91 53 80 105 94 79 6 47.6 Alaska 0.0% 49 1 1 7.0 California 9.9% 1 389 69 35 66 84 71 58 6 49.4 Hawaii 0.1% 45 3 1 2 3.0 Oregon 1.1% 27 43 11 7 5 7 6 7 26.1 Washington 1.8% 21 72 10 8 9 14 17 14 53.2
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of
Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2013Number of Establishments
19
Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4
Empls.5-9
Empls.10-19
Empls.20-49
Empls.50-99
Empls.100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
Avg. Employees/
Estab.
U.S. states + DC - (189) (46) (34) (44) (49) (33) 21 (4) 2.6
New England 2 (10) 3 (2) (5) (2) (3) (2) 1 (1.6)Connecticut 9 (5) 1 (1) (1) (2) 1 (3) (4.3)Maine 5 1 (1) (1) 1 (1) 1 20.8 Massachusetts 11 (7) (2) 2 (1) (1) (4) (1) (2.2)New Hampshire 6 (1) (1) 1 (1) 0.7 Rhode Island 3 4 5 (3) 1 2 (1) (4.4)Vermont 7 (1) (1) 17.5
Mid-Eastern 5 (34) (4) (9) (10) (8) (11) 7 3 (2) 3.7 Delaware 4 1 2 (1) (26.9)Washington DC 6 Maryland 7 (1) (1) 1 (2) 1 10.4 New Jersey 10 (5) 5 (5) 1 (6) (2) 1 1 2.4 New York 17 (13) (2) (3) 1 (2) (10) 3 1 (1) 1.8 Pennsylvania 18 (13) (7) 1 (12) 1 2 2 1 (1) 6.2 West Virginia 8 (3) (1) (2) (1) 1 (11.1)
South Eastern 6 (44) (14) (1) (21) 7 (9) (5) (1) 3.8 Alabama 9 (3) 1 (2) 1 (7) 6 (2) 5.3 Florida 10 (5) 2 2 (1) (7) (2) 1 6.1 Georgia 16 (12) (4) 4 (1) (6) (4) (1) (0.9)Kentucky 12 (8) (2) 2 (5) (3) 2 (2) (1.5)Mississippi 6 2 (2) 2 (1) (1) (8.9)North Carolina 12 (7) (5) (3) (4) (1) 9 (3) (1) 1 11.0 South Carolina 18 (13) (2) (3) 2 (3) (3) (4) 1.6 Tennessee 1 6 (2) (1) 4 (5) 4 6 3.9 Virginia 7 (2) (4) 2 1 (1) 1 (1) 9.4
Great Lakes 7 (56) (8) (17) (15) (19) (16) 14 4 1 7.7 Illinois 10 (6) 4 (4) (2) (9) 5 1 (1) 2.1 Indiana 18 (19) (1) (7) (5) (7) (4) 4 1 9.3 Michigan 13 (9) 3 (5) (1) (7) (3) 1 2 1 18.2 Minnesota 15 (11) (5) (2) (6) 1 2 (1) 31.3 Ohio 7 (1) (2) 1 (9) 6 (3) 8 (2) 0.6 Wisconsin 14 (10) (7) (2) 4 (2) (5) 1 1 4.2
North Central 1 (3) (7) 2 7 3 (2) 5.6 Idaho 7 (1) (1) 1 (2) 1 7.4 Iowa 7 (1) 2 (5) 3 (1) 8.4 Kansas 6 (1) 2 (1) (1) 1 14.7 Missouri 2 5 (2) (1) 1 6 4 (2) (1) (0.5)Montana 6 Nebraska 6 (1) 1 1 (1) (1) 1 12.1 North Dakota 6 1 (1) (1.0)South Dakota 8 (2) (1) (2) 1 13.1 Wyoming 7 (1) (1) 1.5
South Central 3 (10) 2 2 (5) (9) (2) 5 (4) 1 5.8 Arkansas 11 (6) 4 (3) (2) (6) 1 1 (1) 13.6 Louisiana 8 (2) (3) 2 (3) 3 (1) 7.0 Oklahoma 8 (2) (3) 2 (1) (1) 1 23.7 Texas 6 4 1 (3) 1 (5) 4 (3) 1 2.5
South Western 3 (12) (8) (1) (4) 4 (3) 4.4 Arizona 10 (5) (4) 1 (2) 2.9 Colorado 9 (3) (2) (1) (1) 1 (0.4)Nevada 5 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 1 17.9 New Mexico 9 (3) (2) (1) 9.1 Utah 8 (2) 1 (2) (2) 4 (1) (1) (1) 1.0
Western 4 (23) (14) (1) (10) 2 (9) 9 5.2 Alaska 6 California 19 (20) (13) 2 (12) 5 (10) 8 4.2 Hawaii 6 Oregon 9 (3) (2) (1) (1) 2 (1) 17.1 Washington 6 1 (2) 3 (5) 1 2 3.6
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Change in Number of
Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Change in Number of Establishments
20
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 245,334 3,235 36,187 205,912
New England 4.3% 7 10,597 192 2,227 8,178 Connecticut 0.7% 31 1,643 30 418 1,195 Maine 0.6% 34 1,502 7 64 1,431 Massachusetts 2.4% 17 5,898 98 1,159 4,641 New Hampshire 0.2% 40 577 24 296 257 Rhode Island 0.4% 37 943 33 257 653 Vermont 0.0% 46 34 34
Mid-Eastern 14.9% 3 36,648 567 5,714 30,367 Delaware 0.1% 43 330 10 319 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.9% 28 2,088 15 388 1,685 New Jersey 2.7% 16 6,568 118 1,241 5,209 New York 4.1% 8 10,167 260 1,823 8,085 Pennsylvania 7.0% 3 17,125 161 2,196 14,768 West Virginia 0.2% 42 370 4 66 300
South Eastern 22.5% 2 55,306 607 7,025 47,675 Alabama 1.2% 24 2,953 7 337 2,609 Florida 1.8% 19 4,359 129 952 3,278 Georgia 3.5% 11 8,478 111 1,224 7,143 Kentucky 2.7% 15 6,698 30 735 5,933 Mississippi 0.9% 27 2,250 41 459 1,749 North Carolina 5.5% 6 13,379 67 1,226 12,086 South Carolina 1.7% 20 4,265 47 583 3,635 Tennessee 3.6% 9 8,922 93 857 7,973 Virginia 1.6% 22 4,003 81 651 3,271
Great Lakes 30.4% 1 74,588 759 10,428 63,401 Illinois 6.8% 4 16,673 170 2,299 14,205 Indiana 3.5% 10 8,570 64 1,129 7,377 Michigan 3.3% 12 7,992 89 1,300 6,602 Minnesota 3.0% 13 7,376 106 893 6,377 Ohio 6.6% 5 16,138 217 2,989 12,932 Wisconsin 7.3% 2 17,839 114 1,818 15,907
North Central 6.0% 6 14,831 131 2,052 12,648 Idaho 0.2% 41 494 9 84 401 Iowa 1.4% 23 3,532 8 362 3,162 Kansas 0.5% 35 1,343 31 203 1,109 Missouri 2.8% 14 6,984 68 1,148 5,768 Montana 0.0% 47 33 33 Nebraska 0.7% 32 1,601 124 1,477 North Dakota 0.0% 45 81 9 72 South Dakota 0.3% 39 762 4 99 659 Wyoming 0.0% 50 2 2
South Central 8.7% 5 21,442 335 3,145 17,962 Arkansas 2.1% 18 5,110 14 522 4,574 Louisiana 1.1% 25 2,582 33 328 2,221 Oklahoma 0.6% 33 1,571 42 241 1,288 Texas 5.0% 7 12,179 246 2,054 9,879
South Western 2.7% 8 6,600 122 1,149 5,328 Arizona 0.7% 29 1,805 29 277 1,499 Colorado 0.5% 36 1,175 28 290 857 Nevada 0.4% 38 884 32 156 695 New Mexico 0.1% 44 315 19 59 237 Utah 1.0% 26 2,421 14 367 2,040
Western 10.4% 4 25,630 515 4,371 20,744 Alaska 0.0% 49 7 7 California 8.1% 1 19,787 375 3,578 15,834 Hawaii 0.0% 48 16 16 Oregon 0.7% 30 1,731 58 347 1,325 Washington 1.7% 21 4,089 59 445 3,585
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of Employees
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Number of Employees
21
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4
Empls.5-9
Empls.10-19
Empls.20-49
Empls.50-99
Empls.100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 245,334 977 2,258 6,754 29,433 49,030 102,726 35,223 18,933
New England 4.3% 7 10,597 67 124 371 1,857 2,913 3,021 980 1,265 Connecticut 0.7% 31 1,643 12 18 130 287 823 372 Maine 0.6% 34 1,502 7 64 151 296 384 600 Massachusetts 2.4% 17 5,898 34 64 189 970 1,310 2,070 596 665 New Hampshire 0.2% 40 577 4 21 15 280 115 142 Rhode Island 0.4% 37 943 18 15 37 221 513 140 Vermont 0.0% 46 34 34
Mid-Eastern 14.9% 3 36,648 169 398 1,229 4,485 5,764 15,353 6,243 3,007 Delaware 0.1% 43 330 4 6 319 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.9% 28 2,088 9 6 85 304 222 796 668 New Jersey 2.7% 16 6,568 58 60 302 939 1,491 3,477 241 New York 4.1% 8 10,167 67 193 488 1,334 1,540 4,258 1,507 780 Pennsylvania 7.0% 3 17,125 29 132 354 1,842 2,512 6,203 4,494 1,559 West Virginia 0.2% 42 370 4 66 300
South Eastern 22.5% 2 55,306 163 444 1,190 5,834 12,759 23,763 8,780 2,374 Alabama 1.2% 24 2,953 7 46 292 1,069 1,247 292 Florida 1.8% 19 4,359 53 76 263 690 951 1,689 637 Georgia 3.5% 11 8,478 13 98 163 1,061 1,941 3,598 872 732 Kentucky 2.7% 15 6,698 10 20 106 629 690 2,522 2,721 Mississippi 0.9% 27 2,250 13 28 55 404 982 767 North Carolina 5.5% 6 13,379 11 57 166 1,059 3,048 5,673 2,724 641 South Carolina 1.7% 20 4,265 17 30 76 506 1,097 1,716 822 Tennessee 3.6% 9 8,922 22 71 229 628 1,906 4,676 390 1,001 Virginia 1.6% 22 4,003 17 64 86 566 1,074 1,874 322
Great Lakes 30.4% 1 74,588 232 526 1,837 8,591 13,910 29,067 11,790 8,634 Illinois 6.8% 4 16,673 47 123 408 1,890 3,133 7,044 1,788 2,240 Indiana 3.5% 10 8,570 24 40 179 950 1,799 3,804 1,258 517 Michigan 3.3% 12 7,992 45 44 299 1,001 1,690 2,926 1,294 692 Minnesota 3.0% 13 7,376 25 81 120 773 862 2,924 836 1,755 Ohio 6.6% 5 16,138 64 153 580 2,409 3,899 7,101 1,374 558 Wisconsin 7.3% 2 17,839 28 86 251 1,567 2,526 5,268 5,241 2,872
North Central 6.0% 6 14,831 45 85 330 1,722 2,392 7,399 1,576 1,281 Idaho 0.2% 41 494 2 7 14 70 401 Iowa 1.4% 23 3,532 8 98 264 477 2,090 595 Kansas 0.5% 35 1,343 7 24 18 184 418 691 Missouri 2.8% 14 6,984 21 48 160 988 1,215 2,625 1,242 686 Montana 0.0% 47 33 33 Nebraska 0.7% 32 1,601 29 95 136 1,007 334 North Dakota 0.0% 45 81 2 7 72 South Dakota 0.3% 39 762 4 11 88 74 585 Wyoming 0.0% 50 2 2
South Central 8.7% 5 21,442 109 226 472 2,672 3,859 9,425 2,467 2,211 Arkansas 2.1% 18 5,110 7 7 75 447 435 1,978 1,429 732 Louisiana 1.1% 25 2,582 5 29 86 242 750 754 718 Oklahoma 0.6% 33 1,571 6 35 19 222 297 991 Texas 5.0% 7 12,179 91 155 292 1,762 2,376 5,703 320 1,479
South Western 2.7% 8 6,600 45 78 296 853 1,078 2,510 1,008 732 Arizona 0.7% 29 1,805 4 25 100 178 217 898 384 Colorado 0.5% 36 1,175 17 11 108 182 347 510 Nevada 0.4% 38 884 4 28 24 132 213 145 337 New Mexico 0.1% 44 315 5 13 26 33 72 165 Utah 1.0% 26 2,421 14 39 328 229 792 287 732
Western 10.4% 4 25,630 154 361 962 3,410 6,304 12,398 2,042 Alaska 0.0% 49 7 7 California 8.1% 1 19,787 116 259 744 2,835 4,481 9,310 2,042 Hawaii 0.0% 48 16 2 14 Oregon 0.7% 30 1,731 18 41 52 295 448 878 Washington 1.7% 21 4,089 18 41 166 280 1,375 2,210
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of Employees
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Number of Employees
22
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $13,410 $179 $1,693 $11,539
New England 4.4% 7 $588 $9 $105 $473Connecticut 0.7% 29 $96 $2 $19 $75Maine 0.6% 34 $77 $0 $3 $74Massachusetts 2.5% 17 $340 $5 $57 $278New Hampshire 0.2% 40 $29 $1 $14 $14Rhode Island 0.3% 38 $44 $2 $10 $32Vermont 0.0% 46 $2 $2
Mid-Eastern 15.0% 3 $2,006 $29 $258 $1,718Delaware 0.1% 43 $18 $1 $18Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 28 $102 $1 $18 $83New Jersey 2.8% 13 $380 $6 $60 $314New York 3.9% 8 $527 $14 $76 $438Pennsylvania 7.2% 3 $959 $8 $101 $850West Virginia 0.1% 42 $19 $0 $3 $16
South Eastern 22.1% 2 $2,970 $30 $314 $2,626Alabama 1.2% 24 $157 $1 $15 $141Florida 2.0% 18 $273 $6 $44 $223Georgia 3.5% 10 $470 $5 $55 $411Kentucky 2.7% 14 $360 $2 $35 $323Mississippi 0.8% 27 $109 $1 $20 $88North Carolina 5.4% 6 $727 $3 $52 $672South Carolina 1.7% 20 $228 $3 $28 $197Tennessee 3.2% 12 $433 $6 $36 $391Virginia 1.6% 22 $213 $4 $28 $181
Great Lakes 31.1% 1 $4,175 $59 $500 $3,616Illinois 7.0% 4 $937 $27 $118 $792Indiana 3.6% 9 $478 $3 $56 $420Michigan 2.7% 15 $359 $4 $63 $292Minnesota 3.4% 11 $463 $5 $44 $414Ohio 6.4% 5 $858 $14 $134 $710Wisconsin 8.1% 2 $1,081 $6 $86 $989
North Central 5.6% 6 $752 $7 $91 $654Idaho 0.2% 41 $29 $1 $4 $25Iowa 1.4% 23 $189 $1 $18 $170Kansas 0.5% 35 $69 $2 $9 $58Missouri 2.6% 16 $347 $4 $50 $293Montana 0.0% 47 $2 $2Nebraska 0.6% 33 $78 $5 $73North Dakota 0.0% 45 $5 $0 $4South Dakota 0.3% 39 $35 $0 $4 $30Wyoming 0.0% 50 $0 $0
South Central 8.2% 5 $1,103 $15 $139 $949Arkansas 1.9% 19 $259 $1 $21 $237Louisiana 1.0% 26 $130 $1 $12 $117Oklahoma 0.6% 32 $79 $2 $9 $68Texas 4.7% 7 $635 $11 $97 $528
South Western 2.7% 8 $365 $6 $52 $307Arizona 0.7% 31 $94 $1 $12 $81Colorado 0.5% 36 $69 $2 $14 $53Nevada 0.4% 37 $52 $1 $8 $42New Mexico 0.1% 44 $16 $1 $2 $13Utah 1.0% 25 $134 $1 $15 $118
Western 10.8% 4 $1,452 $28 $209 $1,215Alaska 0.0% 49 $0 $0California 8.4% 1 $1,129 $21 $174 $935Hawaii 0.0% 48 $1 $1Oregon 0.7% 30 $94 $3 $16 $76Washington 1.7% 21 $227 $3 $20 $204
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Payrolls
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Total Payrolls ($Millions)
23
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4
Empls.5-9
Empls.10-19
Empls.20-49
Empls.50-99
Empls.100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $13,410 $80 $99 $288 $1,404 $2,674 $5,863 $1,983 $1,019
New England 4.4% 7 $588 $3 $6 $15 $90 $165 $176 $64 $68Connecticut 0.7% 29 $96 $1 $1 $6 $13 $47 $28Maine 0.6% 34 $77 $0 $3 $9 $18 $22 $25Massachusetts 2.5% 17 $340 $2 $3 $8 $50 $77 $117 $41 $43New Hampshire 0.2% 40 $29 $0 $1 $1 $13 $6 $8Rhode Island 0.3% 38 $44 $1 $1 $1 $9 $26 $6Vermont 0.0% 46 $2 $2
Mid-Eastern 15.0% 3 $2,006 $11 $18 $56 $202 $326 $893 $337 $162Delaware 0.1% 43 $18 $0 $0 $18Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 28 $102 $1 $0 $4 $14 $12 $44 $27New Jersey 2.8% 13 $380 $4 $3 $15 $44 $89 $211 $14New York 3.9% 8 $527 $4 $9 $22 $54 $80 $234 $75 $49Pennsylvania 7.2% 3 $959 $2 $5 $14 $87 $144 $370 $249 $87West Virginia 0.1% 42 $19 $0 $3 $16
South Eastern 22.1% 2 $2,970 $11 $19 $48 $267 $679 $1,338 $511 $97Alabama 1.2% 24 $157 $1 $2 $14 $54 $69 $18Florida 2.0% 18 $273 $2 $4 $12 $32 $57 $112 $53Georgia 3.5% 10 $470 $1 $4 $6 $49 $109 $202 $49 $50Kentucky 2.7% 14 $360 $1 $1 $5 $31 $34 $139 $149Mississippi 0.8% 27 $109 $0 $1 $2 $18 $46 $42North Carolina 5.4% 6 $727 $1 $2 $6 $46 $168 $330 $150 $24South Carolina 1.7% 20 $228 $1 $1 $3 $25 $56 $89 $52Tennessee 3.2% 12 $433 $3 $3 $10 $26 $94 $253 $21 $23Virginia 1.6% 22 $213 $1 $3 $3 $25 $61 $101 $19
Great Lakes 31.1% 1 $4,175 $25 $35 $76 $423 $757 $1,714 $706 $439Illinois 7.0% 4 $937 $11 $16 $20 $98 $181 $420 $101 $90Indiana 3.6% 9 $478 $1 $2 $6 $50 $97 $211 $89 $22Michigan 2.7% 15 $359 $2 $2 $11 $52 $79 $148 $50 $15Minnesota 3.4% 11 $463 $1 $3 $5 $39 $49 $186 $55 $123Ohio 6.4% 5 $858 $6 $8 $23 $111 $200 $417 $68 $24Wisconsin 8.1% 2 $1,081 $2 $4 $11 $74 $150 $331 $343 $165
North Central 5.6% 6 $752 $4 $4 $12 $79 $133 $383 $77 $61Idaho 0.2% 41 $29 $0 $0 $1 $3 $25Iowa 1.4% 23 $189 $1 $3 $14 $35 $98 $37Kansas 0.5% 35 $69 $1 $1 $1 $9 $21 $37Missouri 2.6% 16 $347 $2 $2 $6 $44 $62 $145 $63 $23Montana 0.0% 47 $2 $2Nebraska 0.6% 33 $78 $1 $4 $7 $51 $14North Dakota 0.0% 45 $5 $0 $0 $4South Dakota 0.3% 39 $35 $0 $0 $4 $3 $27Wyoming 0.0% 50 $0 $0
South Central 8.2% 5 $1,103 $6 $9 $19 $120 $190 $517 $117 $125Arkansas 1.9% 19 $259 $1 $0 $3 $18 $17 $93 $77 $50Louisiana 1.0% 26 $130 $0 $1 $3 $9 $38 $45 $34Oklahoma 0.6% 32 $79 $0 $1 $1 $8 $14 $54Texas 4.7% 7 $635 $5 $6 $12 $84 $121 $325 $6 $75
South Western 2.7% 8 $365 $3 $3 $12 $40 $62 $140 $56 $50Arizona 0.7% 31 $94 $0 $1 $5 $7 $10 $49 $22Colorado 0.5% 36 $69 $1 $1 $4 $10 $23 $30Nevada 0.4% 37 $52 $0 $1 $1 $7 $14 $8 $20New Mexico 0.1% 44 $16 $0 $0 $1 $2 $4 $9Utah 1.0% 25 $134 $1 $1 $14 $11 $44 $13 $50
Western 10.8% 4 $1,452 $11 $17 $39 $171 $361 $744 $109Alaska 0.0% 49 $0 $0California 8.4% 1 $1,129 $8 $13 $30 $143 $263 $563 $109Hawaii 0.0% 48 $1 $0 $1Oregon 0.7% 30 $94 $1 $2 $2 $14 $25 $51Washington 1.7% 21 $227 $1 $2 $7 $14 $74 $130
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Payrolls
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Total Payrolls ($Millions)
24
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $105,077 $1,062 $12,604 $91,411
New England 4.2% 7 $4,411 $65 $729 $3,617Connecticut 0.6% 34 $621 $12 $139 $471Maine 0.7% 31 $702 $4 $20 $678Massachusetts 2.4% 17 $2,539 $33 $375 $2,131New Hampshire 0.2% 41 $209 $9 $110 $89Rhode Island 0.3% 38 $331 $8 $76 $248Vermont 0.0% 47 $9 $9
Mid-Eastern 15.1% 3 $15,908 $183 $2,047 $13,678Delaware 0.1% 42 $149 $4 $145Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 29 $875 $5 $130 $740New Jersey 2.5% 16 $2,640 $34 $448 $2,158New York 4.2% 8 $4,374 $80 $636 $3,657Pennsylvania 7.4% 3 $7,730 $58 $805 $6,866West Virginia 0.1% 44 $140 $1 $27 $112
South Eastern 21.8% 2 $22,924 $201 $2,403 $20,319Alabama 1.1% 25 $1,189 $1 $118 $1,070Florida 1.7% 20 $1,769 $40 $330 $1,399Georgia 3.5% 10 $3,716 $42 $417 $3,257Kentucky 2.5% 15 $2,665 $10 $238 $2,417Mississippi 0.9% 27 $946 $13 $160 $774North Carolina 5.2% 6 $5,436 $26 $430 $4,981South Carolina 1.7% 19 $1,787 $15 $192 $1,580Tennessee 3.7% 9 $3,898 $29 $300 $3,569Virginia 1.4% 23 $1,517 $25 $220 $1,272
Great Lakes 31.0% 1 $32,536 $252 $3,702 $28,583Illinois 6.6% 4 $6,924 $57 $811 $6,055Indiana 3.4% 11 $3,591 $21 $413 $3,156Michigan 3.1% 13 $3,293 $32 $465 $2,796Minnesota 3.4% 12 $3,531 $31 $303 $3,197Ohio 6.2% 5 $6,527 $74 $1,057 $5,396Wisconsin 8.3% 1 $8,671 $37 $652 $7,982
North Central 5.8% 6 $6,101 $41 $722 $5,338Idaho 0.2% 40 $237 $4 $34 $199Iowa 1.5% 22 $1,596 $3 $131 $1,462Kansas 0.5% 35 $551 $8 $63 $480Missouri 2.6% 14 $2,746 $21 $403 $2,321Montana 0.0% 46 $13 $13Nebraska 0.6% 33 $638 $41 $597North Dakota 0.0% 45 $37 $4 $34South Dakota 0.3% 39 $282 $1 $36 $246Wyoming 0.0% 50 $1 $1
South Central 9.2% 5 $9,647 $110 $1,091 $8,446Arkansas 2.4% 18 $2,522 $4 $184 $2,333Louisiana 1.0% 26 $1,075 $9 $109 $957Oklahoma 0.6% 32 $665 $15 $76 $573Texas 5.1% 7 $5,386 $82 $722 $4,582
South Western 3.1% 8 $3,213 $37 $404 $2,772Arizona 0.8% 28 $887 $10 $94 $784Colorado 0.4% 36 $467 $9 $105 $353Nevada 0.4% 37 $457 $9 $61 $387New Mexico 0.1% 43 $142 $6 $22 $114Utah 1.2% 24 $1,260 $3 $122 $1,135
Western 10.0% 4 $10,560 $166 $1,479 $8,915Alaska 0.0% 49 $2 $2California 7.8% 2 $8,187 $121 $1,209 $6,856Hawaii 0.0% 48 $6 $6Oregon 0.7% 30 $726 $20 $121 $585Washington 1.6% 21 $1,639 $17 $149 $1,473
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Sales
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Value of Sales/Shipments ($Millions)
25
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4
Empls.5-9
Empls.10-19
Empls.20-49
Empls.50-99
Empls.100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $105,077 $279 $784 $2,423 $10,181 $19,486 $43,897 $16,455 $11,573
New England 4.2% 7 $4,411 $18 $47 $124 $605 $1,115 $1,290 $552 $661Connecticut 0.6% 34 $621 $3 $9 $46 $92 $317 $154Maine 0.7% 31 $702 $4 $20 $59 $134 $273 $212Massachusetts 2.4% 17 $2,539 $10 $23 $62 $313 $506 $897 $279 $449New Hampshire 0.2% 41 $209 $1 $8 $4 $106 $43 $46Rhode Island 0.3% 38 $331 $4 $4 $12 $63 $190 $58Vermont 0.0% 47 $9 $9
Mid-Eastern 15.1% 3 $15,908 $45 $137 $434 $1,613 $2,238 $6,510 $2,799 $2,131Delaware 0.1% 42 $149 $1 $3 $145Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 29 $875 $3 $2 $32 $99 $93 $352 $295New Jersey 2.5% 16 $2,640 $15 $19 $106 $343 $585 $1,448 $125New York 4.2% 8 $4,374 $17 $63 $172 $464 $586 $1,772 $688 $612Pennsylvania 7.4% 3 $7,730 $8 $50 $125 $680 $975 $2,682 $1,986 $1,223West Virginia 0.1% 44 $140 $1 $27 $112
South Eastern 21.8% 2 $22,924 $45 $157 $424 $1,979 $5,049 $9,801 $3,954 $1,516Alabama 1.1% 25 $1,189 $1 $16 $102 $435 $522 $113Florida 1.7% 20 $1,769 $14 $26 $93 $237 $391 $669 $339Georgia 3.5% 10 $3,716 $5 $37 $60 $358 $724 $1,467 $493 $574Kentucky 2.5% 15 $2,665 $3 $7 $33 $205 $284 $1,005 $1,128Mississippi 0.9% 27 $946 $3 $10 $19 $141 $394 $380North Carolina 5.2% 6 $5,436 $4 $22 $59 $370 $1,181 $2,286 $1,248 $266South Carolina 1.7% 19 $1,787 $5 $10 $29 $163 $438 $797 $345Tennessee 3.7% 9 $3,898 $6 $24 $83 $217 $772 $1,971 $151 $675Virginia 1.4% 23 $1,517 $5 $20 $33 $187 $431 $703 $137
Great Lakes 31.0% 1 $32,536 $69 $183 $688 $3,014 $5,518 $12,476 $5,666 $4,923Illinois 6.6% 4 $6,924 $15 $42 $156 $656 $1,234 $3,037 $754 $1,030Indiana 3.4% 11 $3,591 $6 $15 $68 $345 $729 $1,630 $583 $215Michigan 3.1% 13 $3,293 $14 $18 $112 $354 $647 $1,279 $563 $306Minnesota 3.4% 12 $3,531 $6 $24 $46 $257 $354 $1,216 $394 $1,233Ohio 6.2% 5 $6,527 $19 $55 $219 $837 $1,561 $3,012 $576 $247Wisconsin 8.3% 1 $8,671 $9 $28 $87 $565 $993 $2,301 $2,796 $1,893
North Central 5.8% 6 $6,101 $12 $29 $119 $603 $984 $3,099 $612 $644Idaho 0.2% 40 $237 $0 $3 $4 $30 $199Iowa 1.5% 22 $1,596 $3 $35 $97 $199 $862 $402Kansas 0.5% 35 $551 $1 $7 $8 $55 $164 $316Missouri 2.6% 14 $2,746 $6 $15 $59 $345 $499 $1,097 $483 $242Montana 0.0% 46 $13 $13Nebraska 0.6% 33 $638 $9 $32 $60 $408 $129North Dakota 0.0% 45 $37 $0 $3 $34South Dakota 0.3% 39 $282 $1 $5 $31 $30 $216Wyoming 0.0% 50 $1 $1
South Central 9.2% 5 $9,647 $32 $78 $160 $931 $1,548 $4,263 $1,155 $1,479Arkansas 2.4% 18 $2,522 $2 $2 $24 $160 $182 $852 $726 $574Louisiana 1.0% 26 $1,075 $1 $8 $26 $83 $303 $360 $293Oklahoma 0.6% 32 $665 $1 $14 $5 $71 $128 $446Texas 5.1% 7 $5,386 $28 $54 $104 $618 $936 $2,605 $137 $905
South Western 3.1% 8 $3,213 $12 $25 $101 $302 $430 $1,134 $634 $574Arizona 0.8% 28 $887 $1 $9 $32 $62 $79 $433 $272Colorado 0.4% 36 $467 $5 $4 $38 $66 $143 $210Nevada 0.4% 37 $457 $1 $8 $9 $53 $77 $71 $239New Mexico 0.1% 43 $142 $2 $4 $9 $13 $34 $80Utah 1.2% 24 $1,260 $3 $13 $109 $98 $341 $122 $574
Western 10.0% 4 $10,560 $46 $120 $349 $1,130 $2,590 $5,393 $931Alaska 0.0% 49 $2 $2California 7.8% 2 $8,187 $36 $85 $268 $941 $1,881 $4,044 $931Hawaii 0.0% 48 $6 $0 $6Oregon 0.7% 30 $726 $4 $15 $21 $100 $175 $410Washington 1.6% 21 $1,639 $5 $12 $60 $89 $534 $939
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Sales
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Value of Sales/Shipments ($Millions)
26
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $2,586.0 $24.8 $296.7 $2,264.5
New England 3.9% 7 $102.1 $1.6 $16.2 $84.4Connecticut 0.7% 32 $16.8 $0.3 $3.5 $13.0Maine 0.5% 34 $14.0 $0.1 $0.4 $13.5Massachusetts 2.2% 17 $57.7 $0.7 $7.9 $49.0New Hampshire 0.2% 41 $4.4 $0.2 $2.5 $1.7Rhode Island 0.3% 37 $8.9 $0.2 $1.6 $7.1Vermont 0.0% 47 $0.2 $0.2
Mid-Eastern 14.2% 3 $368.4 $4.3 $47.1 $317.0Delaware 0.1% 44 $2.8 $0.1 $2.7Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 28 $21.8 $0.1 $3.0 $18.7New Jersey 2.5% 16 $64.5 $0.8 $10.0 $53.7New York 4.1% 8 $105.5 $1.8 $14.4 $89.3Pennsylvania 6.6% 4 $170.9 $1.5 $18.9 $150.5West Virginia 0.1% 43 $3.0 $0.0 $0.8 $2.1
South Eastern 23.0% 2 $595.8 $4.7 $57.6 $533.4Alabama 1.4% 24 $35.7 $0.0 $3.0 $32.6Florida 1.9% 19 $48.4 $0.9 $8.1 $39.4Georgia 3.4% 11 $88.9 $1.1 $10.1 $77.8Kentucky 2.7% 15 $68.8 $0.2 $5.8 $62.8Mississippi 0.9% 27 $23.7 $0.3 $3.8 $19.7North Carolina 5.7% 6 $147.2 $0.6 $10.0 $136.6South Carolina 1.7% 20 $44.4 $0.4 $4.2 $39.8Tennessee 3.9% 9 $100.2 $0.7 $7.4 $92.1Virginia 1.5% 22 $38.5 $0.6 $5.2 $32.7
Great Lakes 30.6% 1 $791.3 $5.9 $88.1 $697.3Illinois 6.9% 3 $177.5 $1.3 $19.7 $156.5Indiana 3.7% 10 $95.7 $0.5 $10.8 $84.5Michigan 3.3% 12 $86.3 $0.8 $11.6 $73.9Minnesota 3.2% 13 $81.7 $0.6 $7.3 $73.8Ohio 6.3% 5 $164.0 $1.8 $24.3 $138.0Wisconsin 7.2% 2 $186.0 $0.8 $14.4 $170.8
North Central 6.1% 6 $157.1 $1.0 $17.6 $138.6Idaho 0.2% 40 $5.2 $0.1 $0.7 $4.4Iowa 1.5% 23 $37.7 $0.1 $3.2 $34.4Kansas 0.5% 36 $12.6 $0.2 $1.3 $11.1Missouri 2.8% 14 $72.8 $0.5 $10.0 $62.3Montana 0.0% 46 $0.4 $0.4Nebraska 0.7% 29 $18.2 $0.9 $17.3North Dakota 0.1% 45 $1.5 $0.1 $1.3South Dakota 0.3% 38 $8.8 $0.0 $1.0 $7.7Wyoming 0.0% 50 $0.0 $0.0
South Central 9.0% 5 $231.7 $2.6 $27.3 $201.9Arkansas 2.2% 18 $57.2 $0.1 $4.9 $52.3Louisiana 1.1% 25 $27.6 $0.2 $2.6 $24.8Oklahoma 0.6% 33 $15.3 $0.4 $2.0 $12.9Texas 5.1% 7 $131.6 $2.0 $17.8 $111.9
South Western 2.7% 8 $70.2 $0.8 $9.1 $60.3Arizona 0.7% 30 $18.0 $0.2 $2.1 $15.7Colorado 0.5% 35 $13.2 $0.3 $2.4 $10.5Nevada 0.3% 39 $8.5 $0.2 $1.3 $7.0New Mexico 0.1% 42 $3.4 $0.1 $0.6 $2.8Utah 1.0% 26 $27.1 $0.1 $2.7 $24.4
Western 10.6% 4 $273.6 $3.8 $33.4 $236.4Alaska 0.0% 49 $0.0 $0.0California 8.3% 1 $213.6 $2.8 $27.5 $183.3Hawaii 0.0% 48 $0.2 $0.2Oregon 0.7% 31 $17.5 $0.4 $2.8 $14.3Washington 1.6% 21 $42.3 $0.4 $3.1 $38.8
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by CapEx
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Value of Capital Expenditure ($M)
27
% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4
Empls.5-9
Empls.10-19
Empls.20-49
Empls.50-99
Empls.100-249Empls.
250-499Empls.
500+Empls.
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $2,586.0 $6.6 $18.2 $56.8 $239.9 $597.5 $1,032.8 $393.0 $241.1
New England 3.9% 7 $102.1 $0.4 $1.1 $2.7 $13.4 $31.5 $29.6 $10.6 $12.7Connecticut 0.7% 32 $16.8 $0.1 $0.3 $1.0 $2.5 $9.1 $4.0Maine 0.5% 34 $14.0 $0.1 $0.4 $2.2 $2.9 $4.8 $3.7Massachusetts 2.2% 17 $57.7 $0.3 $0.5 $1.4 $6.6 $13.5 $20.8 $5.8 $9.0New Hampshire 0.2% 41 $4.4 $0.0 $0.2 $0.1 $2.4 $0.9 $0.8Rhode Island 0.3% 37 $8.9 $0.1 $0.1 $0.2 $1.4 $5.9 $1.2Vermont 0.0% 47 $0.2 $0.2
Mid-Eastern 14.2% 3 $368.4 $1.0 $3.2 $10.1 $37.0 $67.1 $148.8 $61.3 $39.9Delaware 0.1% 44 $2.8 $0.0 $0.1 $2.7Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.8% 28 $21.8 $0.1 $0.0 $0.8 $2.2 $2.5 $8.4 $7.8New Jersey 2.5% 16 $64.5 $0.3 $0.4 $2.4 $7.7 $16.9 $34.0 $2.7New York 4.1% 8 $105.5 $0.3 $1.4 $4.0 $10.4 $18.6 $41.6 $18.4 $10.7Pennsylvania 6.6% 4 $170.9 $0.2 $1.3 $2.8 $16.0 $29.0 $59.9 $40.2 $21.4West Virginia 0.1% 43 $3.0 $0.0 $0.8 $2.1
South Eastern 23.0% 2 $595.8 $1.0 $3.7 $10.0 $47.6 $158.7 $239.2 $102.6 $32.9Alabama 1.4% 24 $35.7 $0.0 $0.4 $2.7 $15.0 $13.3 $4.3Florida 1.9% 19 $48.4 $0.3 $0.6 $2.3 $5.8 $12.7 $18.1 $8.7Georgia 3.4% 11 $88.9 $0.1 $0.9 $1.5 $8.6 $22.7 $33.9 $11.1 $10.0Kentucky 2.7% 15 $68.8 $0.1 $0.2 $0.7 $5.0 $8.3 $25.9 $28.6Mississippi 0.9% 27 $23.7 $0.1 $0.2 $0.4 $3.4 $11.5 $8.1North Carolina 5.7% 6 $147.2 $0.1 $0.5 $1.4 $8.6 $36.4 $57.5 $33.4 $9.3South Carolina 1.7% 20 $44.4 $0.1 $0.3 $0.6 $3.6 $14.4 $17.2 $8.2Tennessee 3.9% 9 $100.2 $0.1 $0.6 $2.1 $5.3 $24.9 $48.1 $5.7 $13.5Virginia 1.5% 22 $38.5 $0.1 $0.5 $0.7 $4.5 $12.8 $17.2 $2.7
Great Lakes 30.6% 1 $791.3 $1.7 $4.2 $16.8 $71.3 $164.1 $288.2 $133.4 $111.6Illinois 6.9% 3 $177.5 $0.4 $0.9 $3.9 $15.8 $35.6 $70.6 $23.2 $27.1Indiana 3.7% 10 $95.7 $0.1 $0.4 $1.6 $9.1 $24.4 $38.2 $14.4 $7.5Michigan 3.3% 12 $86.3 $0.4 $0.5 $2.8 $8.8 $19.8 $31.1 $14.8 $8.0Minnesota 3.2% 13 $81.7 $0.2 $0.5 $1.3 $6.1 $10.5 $30.5 $8.2 $24.7Ohio 6.3% 5 $164.0 $0.5 $1.3 $5.3 $19.0 $49.1 $67.5 $14.8 $6.5Wisconsin 7.2% 2 $186.0 $0.2 $0.6 $1.9 $12.4 $24.7 $50.3 $58.0 $37.8
North Central 6.1% 6 $157.1 $0.3 $0.7 $2.9 $14.7 $31.1 $75.8 $19.4 $12.3Idaho 0.2% 40 $5.2 $0.0 $0.1 $0.1 $0.6 $4.4Iowa 1.5% 23 $37.7 $0.1 $0.8 $2.5 $6.6 $19.8 $8.0Kansas 0.5% 36 $12.6 $0.0 $0.1 $0.2 $1.1 $4.4 $6.7Missouri 2.8% 14 $72.8 $0.1 $0.4 $1.4 $8.6 $16.6 $27.0 $14.5 $4.2Montana 0.0% 46 $0.4 $0.4Nebraska 0.7% 29 $18.2 $0.2 $0.7 $1.7 $10.7 $4.9North Dakota 0.1% 45 $1.5 $0.0 $0.1 $1.3South Dakota 0.3% 38 $8.8 $0.0 $0.1 $0.9 $0.5 $7.2Wyoming 0.0% 50 $0.0 $0.0
South Central 9.0% 5 $231.7 $0.8 $1.8 $3.8 $23.4 $48.1 $96.2 $28.7 $28.8Arkansas 2.2% 18 $57.2 $0.0 $0.0 $0.7 $4.2 $5.8 $18.6 $17.9 $10.1Louisiana 1.1% 25 $27.6 $0.0 $0.2 $0.5 $2.1 $8.4 $8.3 $8.1Oklahoma 0.6% 33 $15.3 $0.0 $0.3 $0.2 $1.8 $3.9 $9.1Texas 5.1% 7 $131.6 $0.7 $1.3 $2.5 $15.3 $30.1 $60.3 $2.7 $18.7
South Western 2.7% 8 $70.2 $0.3 $0.6 $2.1 $6.9 $12.8 $26.1 $11.4 $10.1Arizona 0.7% 30 $18.0 $0.0 $0.2 $0.7 $1.4 $1.8 $9.1 $4.8Colorado 0.5% 35 $13.2 $0.1 $0.1 $0.9 $1.5 $5.5 $5.1Nevada 0.3% 39 $8.5 $0.0 $0.1 $0.2 $1.1 $1.6 $1.2 $4.2New Mexico 0.1% 42 $3.4 $0.0 $0.1 $0.2 $0.4 $1.3 $1.4Utah 1.0% 26 $27.1 $0.1 $0.2 $2.4 $2.6 $9.3 $2.4 $10.1
Western 10.6% 4 $273.6 $1.1 $2.7 $7.9 $25.5 $84.5 $130.0 $21.9Alaska 0.0% 49 $0.0 $0.0California 8.3% 1 $213.6 $0.9 $1.9 $6.0 $21.5 $63.4 $97.9 $21.9Hawaii 0.0% 48 $0.2 $0.0 $0.1Oregon 0.7% 31 $17.5 $0.1 $0.4 $0.6 $2.2 $5.5 $8.8Washington 1.6% 21 $42.3 $0.1 $0.3 $1.3 $1.8 $15.6 $23.2
US States + District of Columbia Ranked by CapEx
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Value of Capital Expenditure ($M)
28
% of Total Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9 Empls.
Medium: 10-49 Empls.
Large: >50+ Empls.
Employees/Estab. Employees Payrolls ($MM) Sales ($MM) CapEx ($MM)
U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 3,757 852 1,382 1,523 65.3 245,334 $13,410 $105,077 $2,586California 9.8% 1 369 93 143 133 53.6 19,787 $1,129 $8,187 $214Ohio 7.4% 2 279 56 113 110 57.8 16,138 $858 $6,527 $164Illinois 6.1% 3 231 49 82 100 72.2 16,673 $937 $6,924 $178Texas 5.8% 4 219 64 78 77 55.6 12,179 $635 $5,386 $132Pennsylvania 5.5% 5 207 36 80 91 82.7 17,125 $959 $7,730 $171New York 5.2% 6 195 61 76 58 52.1 10,167 $527 $4,374 $106Wisconsin 4.8% 7 182 27 67 88 98.0 17,839 $1,081 $8,671 $186North Carolina 4.0% 8 151 15 45 91 87.5 13,379 $727 $5,436 $147New Jersey 3.6% 9 137 40 51 46 47.9 6,568 $380 $2,640 $64Michigan 3.5% 10 131 29 51 51 61.0 7,992 $359 $3,293 $86Tennessee 3.2% 11 120 22 35 63 74.4 8,922 $433 $3,898 $100Indiana 3.1% 12 118 18 42 58 72.6 8,570 $478 $3,591 $96Georgia 3.0% 13 114 19 42 53 74.4 8,478 $470 $3,716 $89Florida 2.9% 14 109 43 39 27 40.0 4,359 $273 $1,769 $48Massachusetts 2.8% 15 106 28 43 35 55.6 5,898 $340 $2,539 $58
Top 15 US States Ranked by Number of Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Employees, Payrolls ($MM), Sales ($MM), CapEx ($MM)
29
% of Total Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9 Empls.
Medium: 10-49 Empls.
Large: >50+ Empls.
Employees/Estab. Employees Payrolls ($MM) Sales ($MM) CapEx ($MM)
US Total 100.0% - 3,757 852 1,382 1,523 65.3 245,334 $13,410 $105,077 $2,586New York-Newark-Jersey City 5.4% 1 202 68 79 55 45.5 9,185 $522 $3,964 $89Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 5.2% 2 196 40 66 90 73.3 14,374 $837 $5,975 $153Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim 4.6% 3 173 40 72 61 52.3 9,051 $517 $3,751 $95Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 2.7% 4 100 26 32 42 61.7 6,173 $339 $2,587 $65Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington 2.1% 5 78 18 28 32 71.9 5,610 $366 $2,590 $61Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington 2.0% 6 74 19 26 29 63.1 4,667 $287 $1,907 $47Cincinnati 1.9% 7 73 15 32 26 64.4 4,703 $240 $1,881 $45Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell 1.8% 8 67 11 23 33 67.5 4,522 $265 $1,783 $45St. Louis 1.4% 9 54 14 19 21 59.2 3,199 $175 $1,258 $33Cleveland-Elyria 1.4% 10 53 11 25 17 48.4 2,744 $176 $1,007 $25Boston-Cambridge-Newton 1.3% 11 47 11 24 12 39.8 1,872 $105 $712 $17Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario 1.2% 12 46 8 22 16 45.4 2,089 $119 $823 $22Detroit-Warren-Dearborn 1.2% 13 44 14 17 13 53.8 2,368 $109 $962 $27Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 1.1% 14 42 14 13 15 48.6 2,042 $109 $827 $20Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis 1.1% 15 41 3 21 17 89.4 3,665 $212 $1,730 $38Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue 1.1% 16 40 10 12 18 51.6 2,065 $108 $799 $22
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach 1.1% 16 40 20 13 7 23.3 932 $47 $363 $10
Kansas City 1.0% 18 39 8 13 18 79.8 3,113 $152 $1,215 $30Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia 1.0% 19 37 2 12 23 71.7 2,865 $157 $1,091 $34Providence-Warwick 1.0% 20 36 13 13 10 36.5 1,313 $66 $476 $13Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land 0.9% 21 32 13 15 4 25.3 817 $48 $337 $9San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 0.8% 22 31 9 13 9 50.6 1,570 $95 $637 $16Springfield 0.8% 22 31 9 12 10 53.1 1,645 $95 $660 $14Oshkosh-Neenah 0.8% 24 29 4 8 17 128.0 3,711 $243 $1,905 $42Denver-Aurora-Lakewood 0.7% 25 28 8 11 9 40.2 1,126 $67 $448 $13
Top 25 US MSAs Ranked by Number of Establishments
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Employees, Payrolls ($MM), Sales ($MM), CapEx ($MM)
A Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is a geographic entity defined by the Office of Management and Budget for use by federal statistical agencies. An MSA consists of the county or counties (or equivalent entities) that are associated with at least one urbanized area of at least 50,000 population, plus adjacent counties that have a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured through studies of worker and other commuting in the area.
30
% of Total Estabs Rank (Popn.) All Sizes Small: 1-9
Empls.Medium: 10-49
Empls.Large: >50+
Empls.Employees/
Estab. Employees Payrolls ($MM) Sales ($MM) CapEx ($MM)
US Total 100.0% - 3,757 852 1,382 1,523 65.3 245,334 $13,410 $105,077 $2,586New York 6.6% 1 247 78 97 72 44.9 11,677 $653 $4,922 $114Los Angeles 6.1% 2 228 52 96 80 50.5 11,536 $661 $4,739 $122Chicago 5.5% 3 206 43 71 92 71.1 14,648 $850 $6,066 $155Washington D.C. 0.9% 4 35 7 18 10 36.6 1,654 $91 $672 $16San Francisco 1.7% 5 62 17 25 20 51.2 3,333 $189 $1,347 $35
Chicago CSA includes: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ottawa-Peru, Kankakee, Michigan City-La PorteWashington D.C. CSA includes: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Hagerstown-Martinsburg, Chambersburg-Waynesboro, Winchester, California-Lexington Park, Easton, CambridgeSan Francisco CSA includes: San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Stockton-Lodi, Santa Rosa, Vallejo-Fairfield, Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Napa
Top 5 Combined Statistical Areas (CSA) ranked by Population
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 2015Employees, Payrolls ($MM), Sales ($MM), CapEx ($MM)
New York CSA is the combination of these Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas: New York-Newark-Jersey City, Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, New Haven-Milford, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Trenton, Torrington, Kingston, East StroudsburgLos Angeles CSA includes: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
31
Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 150 35 61 54 150 34 61 54 149 34 60 54 142 31 55 55Mid-Eastern 405 93 145 167 400 90 145 166 402 89 144 170 391 79 136 174South Eastern 615 96 208 311 626 96 211 320 615 93 206 315 597 82 195 319Great Lakes 787 142 283 362 784 140 282 361 781 139 279 363 757 126 264 364North Central 157 20 61 76 160 20 61 79 159 20 61 78 159 18 60 82South Central 258 56 93 109 262 56 94 113 264 56 94 113 264 51 93 118South Western 78 22 30 26 76 21 28 26 76 21 28 27 69 18 24 27Western 343 78 112 153 342 78 112 152 346 78 112 157 348 72 108 166
Total 2,793 542 993 1,258 2,801 538 994 1,270 2,793 530 984 1,278 2,725 478 938 1,308
Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 7,930 114 1,621 6,194 7,842 109 1,545 6,188 7,737 104 1,483 6,148 7,177 80 1,223 5,875Mid-Eastern 26,207 370 3,675 22,164 26,262 364 3,685 22,212 26,164 348 3,630 22,185 26,164 274 3,477 22,412South Eastern 45,883 387 5,543 39,952 46,713 386 5,652 40,671 47,103 372 5,632 41,100 48,702 302 5,560 42,839Great Lakes 59,894 527 7,581 51,785 60,612 533 7,742 52,338 60,737 513 7,637 52,587 60,737 446 7,372 52,920North Central 11,921 73 1,544 10,305 11,981 71 1,537 10,372 11,897 68 1,516 10,314 11,712 50 1,436 10,225South Central 17,227 208 2,532 14,488 17,701 211 2,601 14,889 17,576 200 2,553 14,822 17,361 166 2,424 14,771South Western 3,778 63 738 2,976 3,668 60 699 2,910 3,588 58 652 2,876 3,401 51 556 2,794Western 21,063 327 2,924 17,813 21,561 332 2,987 18,243 21,089 318 2,896 17,875 21,089 275 2,723 18,093
Total 193,904 2,068 26,159 165,676 196,338 2,066 26,446 167,824 195,889 1,980 26,001 167,908 196,339 1,644 24,769 169,926
Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 461 5 78 378 457 5 75 377 452 5 72 375 422 4 60 358Mid-Eastern 1,514 19 177 1,318 1,517 19 177 1,321 1,512 18 174 1,320 1,515 15 167 1,334South Eastern 2,498 20 253 2,225 2,549 20 258 2,271 2,570 19 257 2,294 2,664 17 255 2,392Great Lakes 3,408 35 382 2,991 3,453 35 390 3,028 3,460 35 385 3,041 3,461 31 372 3,058North Central 630 4 72 554 633 4 72 558 629 3 71 555 619 3 67 549South Central 875 9 114 753 901 9 117 775 896 9 115 772 891 8 109 774South Western 208 4 36 169 202 3 34 165 199 3 32 164 189 3 27 159Western 1,229 17 149 1,063 1,258 17 153 1,088 1,229 17 148 1,064 1,229 15 139 1,075
Total 10,823 113 1,260 9,450 10,970 113 1,274 9,583 10,947 109 1,253 9,584 10,990 96 1,196 9,698
Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 3,333 41 527 2,765 3,339 41 524 2,775 3,358 39 519 2,800 3,289 32 482 2,775Mid-Eastern 10,904 125 1,299 9,479 10,754 121 1,284 9,349 10,877 117 1,283 9,477 10,951 93 1,231 9,627South Eastern 18,859 137 1,900 16,823 19,189 135 1,922 17,131 18,936 128 1,884 16,924 18,822 100 1,796 16,926Great Lakes 26,096 184 2,719 23,193 25,794 180 2,716 22,899 25,941 175 2,698 23,068 25,392 147 2,580 22,665North Central 5,075 26 553 4,496 5,230 26 565 4,640 5,227 24 563 4,640 5,369 19 556 4,793South Central 7,325 72 897 6,357 7,476 72 917 6,487 7,548 69 915 6,564 7,813 59 911 6,844South Western 1,578 21 263 1,294 1,581 20 256 1,305 1,598 20 253 1,325 1,553 16 223 1,314Western 8,944 112 1,001 7,830 8,859 110 997 7,753 9,092 109 1,003 7,980 9,457 95 979 8,383
Total 82,113 718 9,159 72,236 82,222 704 9,180 72,337 82,576 681 9,118 72,778 82,645 561 8,758 73,326
Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 83 1 13 69 84 1 13 70 84 1 13 71 84 1 12 71Mid-Eastern 281 3 34 244 278 3 34 241 281 3 34 244 282 2 32 247South Eastern 525 4 49 472 535 4 50 482 525 3 49 473 520 3 46 471Great Lakes 679 5 71 603 670 5 71 594 671 5 71 596 654 4 68 582North Central 139 1 15 124 143 1 15 127 143 1 15 127 146 1 15 131South Central 191 2 24 165 196 2 25 169 198 2 24 171 204 2 24 177South Western 42 1 7 35 42 1 6 35 42 1 6 36 42 0 6 35Western 245 3 25 217 243 3 25 216 250 3 25 222 262 2 25 234
Total 2,184 19 236 1,929 2,190 18 238 1,934 2,195 18 236 1,940 2,192 14 229 1,949
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222), 20152015 Summary Data, 2016 and 2017 Estimated Data, 2022 Statistical Trend Forecast
Establishments 2015 Actual 2016 Estimate 2017 Estimate 2022 Forecast
Payrolls 2015 $MM Actual 2016 $MM Estimate 2017 $MM Estimate 2022 $MM Forecast
Employment 2015 Actual 2016 Estimate 2017 Estimate 2022 Forecast
Capex 2015 $MM Estimate 2016 $MM Estimate 2017 $MM Estimate 2022 $MM Forecast
Shipments 2015 $MM Estimate 2016 $MM Estimate 2017 $MM Estimate 2022 $MM Forecast
32
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222)Establishments by State: All
33
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222)Establishments by MSA: All
34
Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222)Total Establishments by Region
35
Available Reports
36
27. Converted Paper Product Manufacturing (NAICS 3222)
Available Reports (continued)
37
