onverted Paper Product Manufacturing Plastics Packaging Materials … · 2017-09-01 · NAICS 3222...

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing

+

Plastics Packaging Materials and

Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing

Exclusive Commentary from Dr. Joe Webb and Richard Romano

1

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Exclusive Commentary

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing

[NAICS 3222 + 32611]

This sheet is a rollup of:

NAICS 3222, defined by the Census as: This industry group comprises establishments primarily engaged in converting paper or paperboard without manufacturing paper or paperboard.

NAICS 32611, defined by the Census as: This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in (1) converting plastics resins into unsupported plastics film and sheet and/or (2) forming, coating, or laminating plastics film and sheet into plastics bags.

The commentary below refers to the aggregate data. Each NAICS is covered in separate commentary and data sheets.

Geographic Distribution • California (10.2%), Ohio (7.3%), and Illinois (6.5%) are the three biggest states for

converted paper products and plastics packaging materials manufacturers.

• New York-Newark-Jersey City (5.9%), Chicago-Naperville-Elgin (5.6%), and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim (4.9%) are the top three metro areas for converted paper products and plastics packaging materials manufacturers.

• These low top state and metro area percentages reflect a widely distributed industry, with few centralized manufacturing geographies.

• In general, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) are urbanized areas that have at least 50,000 people. Combined Statistical Areas (CSAs) are much larger metropolitan population regions that include MSAs as well as associated bordering areas. For more details, please refer to the “Key Terms and Definitions” beginning on page 11 of this report.

• The top combined statistical areas (CSAs) are:

Combined Statistical Area New York Los Angeles % of All Establishments 7.1% 6.5%

Establishments 357 330

Employees 16,436 16,463

Payroll $885 Million $922 Million

Sales $6.8 Billion $6.7 Billion

Capital Expenditures $161 Million $170 Million

2

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Commentary (continued) Demographics Establishments

• In 2015, there were 5,046 companies classified in these two NAICS categories.

Just under one-fourth (23%) of establishments in these categories have 1 to 9 employees, over one-third (36%) have 10 to 49 employees, and 41% have 50+ employees.

From 2013 to 2015, these manufacturing establishments declined by -4.3%.

• Since 2010, the number of establishments in this category has declined by -7.0%.

• From 2014 to 2015, establishments declined by -4.3%.

Only very large manufacturers (100+ employees) saw any establishment growth.

• As the individual data and commentary sheets show, the establishment declines were concentrated predominantly among the converted paper product manufacturers.

Plastics packaging materials manufacturer establishment changes were very slight over the past decade and a half.

Employees

• In 2015, there were a total of 345,562 employees in converted paper product and plastics packaging materials manufacturing establishments.

~100,000 of those employees are in the plastics packaging materials manufacturers.

• Generally, overall employment has been relatively flat.

Since 2010, employees have declined -0.2%; since 2014, -0.8%.

Any employment growth has been in larger rather than smaller establishments.

• Since 2010, payroll in converted paper products and plastics packaging materials manufacturing establishments grew +15.0%.

From 2014 to 2015, payroll has grown +3.7%.

• Payroll growth has been predominantly among 50+employee establishments.

Revenues/Value of Shipments

• In 2015, converted paper products and plastics packaging materials manufacturers reported revenues of $146.2 billion.

Large manufacturers accounted for 88% of revenues; small manufacturers 1% of revenues.

• Regionally, manufacturers in the Great Lakes region accounted for nearly one-third (30.2%) of revenues.

• Manufacturers in the South Western states only accounted for 3.2% of revenues.

Capital Expenditures • In 2015, converted paper products and plastics packaging materials manufacturers spent $3.6

billion on capital expenditures.

• 88% of those outlays were by large (50+-employee) establishments, 1% by small establishments.

3

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Commentary (continued)

Technology Impacts and Competitive Trends Specific trends vary according to market:

Corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing:

• Software prototyping of packaging such as boxes results in innovative designs.

New box designs and configurations can optimize logistics of transporting packages, esp. from overseas manufacturers.

• Environmental concerns becoming more important in box conversion.

Environmental benefits often the byproduct of more efficient and lower-cost manufacturing techniques (i.e., reducing water consumption).

• Ecommerce driving demand for more and newer types of corrugated boxes.

Change in demand for different sizes—shipped to consumer vs. shipped to retailer.

Distinction between “for retail” and “for ecommerce” packaging materials.

• The latter doesn’t need eye-catching graphics.

Rengo Gemini Packaging System —used by Amazon, among other mail-order and ecommerce sites—automatically adjusts the height of boxes according to the merchandise being ordered/shipped.

• Digital inkjet corrugated printing systems were the Big Thing at drupa 2016.

Increase in number of stock-keeping units (SKUs) and other “customization” and versioning trends reducing run lengths of corrugated materials.

Digital devices also ideal for hard prototyping (vs. software prototyping).

• “Smart packaging”—which incorporates some kind of often electronic functionality—on the rise.

Packaging Digest identifies two kinds of smart packaging:

• “Active packaging” offers capabilities such as moisture control.

• “Intelligent packaging” offers capabilities that indicate status or environmental/product changes—such as whether a temperature change has taken place (vital in pharmaceutical and food shipping).

Smart packaging now has its own new association: the Active & Intelligent Packaging Industry Association (AIPIA).

• Packaging also making increased use of Quick Response (QR) codes and other smartphone-scannable graphics, which requires higher-quality printing and, therefore, corrugated surfaces.

Competitive Trends

• According to 2014 research by Smithers Pira, demand for corrugated packaging has been increasing by more than 4% annually and is expected to amount to almost 115 million tons worth an estimated $176 billion by 2019.

4

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Commentary (continued) • Manufacturers looking to reduce shipping/transportation weights/costs.

Turning to lighter weight boxes.

In Western Europe, finished board weights have been reduced by an average of 5 gsm, according to data from FEFCO.

On the other hand, heavier corrugated material can replace wooden crates, also helping reduce transportation costs.

• Retail-ready packaging (RRP) had been poised for substantial growth—although the current slump in retail may adversely impact demand.

• New liner technologies improve reproduction of graphics on retail-ready packages and associated point-of-sale (POS) materials.

Folding paperboard box manufacturing:

• Migration of chemicals and other materials through paperboard/cardboard has been identified as a serious concern for food and pharmaceutical packaging.

Increased emphasis on anti-migration barriers and other technologies to reduce/eliminate contamination.

• Digital printing of cartons is becoming common.

Accompanied by laser die-cutting to handle shorter runs.

Growth of small boutique and craft businesses—such as microbreweries—fueling demand for high-quality, shorter-run packaging materials.

• Ecommerce driving demand for more and newer types of cartons.

Change in demand for different sizes—shipped to consumer vs. shipped to retailer.

Distinction between “for retail” and “for ecommerce” packaging materials.

• The latter doesn’t need eye-catching graphics.

• As in corrugated packaging, “smart packaging”—which incorporates some kind of often electronic functionality—on the rise on folding cartons.

Packaging Digest identifies two kinds of smart packaging:

• “Active packaging” offers capabilities such as moisture control.

• “Intelligent packaging” offers capabilities that indicate status or environmental/product changes—such as whether a temperature change has taken place (vital in pharmaceutical and food shipping).

Smart packaging now has its own new association: the Active & Intelligent Packaging Industry Association (AIPIA).

• Folding cartons also making increased use of Quick Response (QR) codes and other smartphone-scannable graphics, which requires higher-quality printing and, therefore, corrugated surfaces.

• Specialty enhancements for retail-ready cartons—like 3D, lenticular imaging, “digital embellishments” (a la Scodfix or MGI)—also becoming important differentiators in retail environments.

Ultraviolet (UV) and electron beam (EB) coatings and other effects also important elements for folding cartons.

5

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Commentary (continued) • “Unboxing”—recording the removal of a new product (like a video game) from a package

and posting it on social media—is a trend. Packaging needs to be ready for its close-up.

• According to Smithers Pira research, healthcare and tobacco products (an ironic combination) are the two largest uses of folding cartons.

Dry and frozen foods also major product categories.

• Manufacturers are striving to reduce overall amount of packaging for a given product.

For reasons of both cost reduction and environmental sustainability.

• Growth of single-person households—especially in Europe—is driving demand for single-serving food packages.

• Introduction off digital printing and “simplified” production allows traditional commercial printers to enter into packaging printing/decoration market.

Barriers to entry still include brand trust, navigating regulatory issues, especially with regard to food and drug packaging.

Other paperboard container manufacturing:

• Products includes in this category include:

Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard.

Milk cartons.

Sanitary food containers.

Egg cartons.

• Liquid packaging market is a substantial one.

I.e., water, soft drinks, dairy products, and fruit juices.

Single-serve, “grab-and-go” liquid cartons and containers driven by lifestyle/convenience trends.

• Paperboard cartons for liquid packaging face competition for various types of plastics, like PET.

• Top concerns for paperboard cartons esp. in food/liquid packaging is migration of chemicals and other materials.

• Food preservation top concern.

• Recyclability of food/liquid cartons is becoming of chief importance.

• These packages tend to be retail-ready vs. ecommerce type.

Brands utilize innovative designs/graphics to attract consumers.

• Functionality of these cartons is also important.

I.e., ease of opening for older consumers.

6

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Commentary (continued) Paper bag and coated and treated paper manufacturing:

• Paper bags can be categorized in two ways.1

By type of bag. For example:

• “Block bottom” paper bags

• Paper carry bags

• Checkout paper bags

• Confectionary paper bags

By intended contents (application). For example:

• Foods

• Pharmaceuticals

• Customer goods

• Cosmetics and personal use products

• Home care products

“Paper vs. plastic” consideration anecdotally works in paper’s favor.

More and more municipalities banning plastic bags.

Paper bags easily recycled.

Growth of reusable bags making this conversation moot.

• Trends in retail trickle down to affect carry bag demand.

Still demand for niche/boutique bags.

Digital printing can eliminate the “blank bag.”

• Laminates and other types of coatings—plastics, foils, etc.—increase strength, aesthetic appeal, but may adversely impact recyclability.

Stationery product manufacturing:

• Said Stationery Trends magazine:2

“There is a strong resurgence in consumers’ passion for stationery and specialty paper products. From journals to cards to prints, the written word and personal sentiments are returning stronger than ever—and in new ways.”

Heavy cardstock, letterpress, lithography, and laser printing are top trends in stationery and greeting cards.

• Traditional print greeting cards are still fairly strong.

According to the Greeting Card Association (GCA, which does an annual survey with Stationery Trends magazine), women 25–44 are the top demographic for greeting cards.

LEDs, audio, and other electronic/rich media elements have made their way into printed greeting cards.

———————————————————————————————————————————-- 1 http://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/paper-bags-market

2 http://stationerytrends.com/news/whats-trending-in-stationery/

7

http://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/paper-bags-market

http://stationerytrends.com/news/whats-trending-in-stationery/

NAICS 3222 + 32611


The GCA has also been tracking a heightened interest in hand-lettered greeting cards, unique shapes, foils, and other special effects.

Ecards have not taken off, despite a strong push by Hallmark and others a decade or so ago.

Christmas cards are increasingly customized/personalized, featuring the sender’s family and printed via digital print services such as Shutterfly.

• For stationery, “foil, embossing, and vibrant colors are must-haves in the stationery scene, accompanied by a little 1950s to 1960s nostalgia,” says Stationery Trends magazine.

• For journals and diaries: “Recycled paper, beautiful binding, leather that features hand detail are trending design elements.”

Journals with unique uses also stand out, from blank journals, to travel diaries, self-exploration journals, and journals that track family memories are trending subjects.

For fitness buffs, “workout diaries” (“WODBooks”) are also popular items.

The classic Moleskine notebook has had a resurgance, and pictures of note-filled Moleskines are shared on social media.3

• Stationery Trends also identifies that letterpress printing—especially art prints and posters—are becoming popular again.

• Essentially, “hand-crafted” is the watchword in this product category.

We suspect many of these “makers” may not be reflected in Census data, as they tend to be individual artisans or hobbyists.

Sanitary paper product manufacturing:

• The sanitary paper product market is a mature one, with few truly new products coming to market and few avenues for growth.4

• Products are broadly divided into “consumer” and “commercial and industrial,” the latter of which is intended for schools, hospitals, or offices.

These products tend to be “non-discretionary,” in that there is very little that will stimulate (or depress) usage/sales.

• Save for a particularly bad cold/flu/allergy season, perhaps.

The adult incontinence product category is perhaps the most recent new product category.

• This market depends on population demographics, which currently favor growth.

• A baby boom would favor growth at the other end of the incontinence spectrum.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————

3 David Sax, The Revenge of Analog, New York: PublicAffairs, 2016, p. 38

4 https://business.highbeam.com/industry-reports/wood/sanitary-paper-products

8

https://business.highbeam.com/industry-reports/wood/sanitary-paper-products

NAICS 3222 + 32611


• Branding and marketing are vital for stimulating sales, since little can be done to drive overall demand, just brand reallocation.

Competition can also be quite fierce.

Overseas and “developing” markets are seen as the biggest opportunities for growth.

• Lowering production costs is also a vital strategy for manufacturers in this category.

• The industry also tends to be highly integrated, so the major companies that manufacture the raw materials also covert those into the final products.

• Small changes in these categories can have substantial environmental impacts.

UK supermarket chain Sainsbury reduced the width of a toilet paper roll by 11mm, allowing more rolls to be fit into a delivery van and eliminating 500 van trips a year—saving 140 tons of CO2 annually in reduced transport and materials.5

All other converted paper product manufacturing:

• This product category largely comprises food trays, egg cartons, and similar materials.

Trends in this packaging category will depend upon trends in the types of food they contain.

• For example, in the case of egg cartons, egg consumption is increasing and creative egg packaging is an uncracked market, says the American Egg Board.6

Different birds—hens vs. ducks vs. ostriches—lay different size eggs, which packaging needs to accommodate.

Opportunity exists for better egg carton design.

The AEB advises against using images of cooked eggs to avoid “alienating” consumers who dislike a particular egg preparation method (scrambled vs. sunny side up, e.g.).

• Competition from foam-based food trays and cartons is substantial.

Cushioning, cost-effectiveness, and moisture-impermeability work in foam’s favor.

Biodegradability/sustainability works in paper-based trays’/carton’ favor.

• There is increased demand for food trays/packaging (take-out, restaurant leftovers, school and cafeteria use, etc., e.g.), but is moving in foam’s direction.

• Increase of municipal bans on foam takeout containers can work to paper’s advantage.7

Plastics packaging materials and unlaminated film and sheet manufacturing:

• Environmental and cost/shipping pressures driving demand for thinner films (“downgauging”).

At the same time, migration of chemicals and other contaminants across food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics packaging a serious concern.

———————————————————————————————————————————-- 5 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/20/sainsburys-toilet-roll-carbon-emissions

6 http://www.aeb.org/retail/consumer-trends/33-retailers

7 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/12/ban-polystyrene-foam-containers/1761145/

9

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/20/sainsburys-toilet-roll-carbon-emissions

http://www.aeb.org/retail/consumer-trends/33-retailers

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/12/ban-polystyrene-foam-containers/1761145/

NAICS 3222 + 32611


• “High-performance” films also needed to extend shelf-life of perishable products.

• Easy-open/easy-close technologies (à la “Ziploc”) are increasingly in demand for packaged foods and other items.

• Shaped packaging also creating unique applications for retail shelves.

• Biodegradable films and plastics also highly desirable.

Experiments have found that the term “biodegradable” is often a stretch.

• Digital printing starting to make inroads into flexible packaging decoration.

• Packaging World identifies nearly a dozen trends in flexible packaging.8

• In 2015, Smithers Pira estimated that the global market for flexible packaging would grow at an annual average rate of 3.4% over the next five years.

Forecasted to hit $248 billion by 2020.9

• Flexible packaging is lighter and thus less expensive to ship than other kinds of packaging, such as paperboard.

• Flexible plastics replacing glass and other rigid containers.

• Tunafish is the emblematic example, as flexible pouches are replacing cans.

Baby food jars now replaced by retort pouches.

Other project categories are also moving toward flexible packaging (ketchup and...wine?).

Lifestyle trends—“grab-and-go,” “single-serving, etc.—driving advances in flexible packaging solutions.

———————————————————————————————————————————-- 8 https://www.packworld.com/article/package-type/bagspouches/stand-pouchbag/flat-bottom-bag/eleven-trends-shaping-flexible

9 http://www.smitherspira.com/resources/2015/september/insight-four-key-trends-driving-flexible-packaging

10

https://www.packworld.com/article/package-type/bagspouches/stand-pouchbag/flat-bottom-bag/eleven-trends-shaping-flexible

http://www.smitherspira.com/resources/2015/september/insight-four-key-trends-driving-flexible-packaging

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Key Terms and Definitions

Annual Survey of Manufactures (Source) - The Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) provides key intercensal measures of manufacturing activity, products, and

location for the public and private sectors. The ASM provides the best measure of current U.S. manufacturing industry

outputs, inputs, operating status, and is the primary basis for updates of the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD). Census

Bureau staff and academic researchers use the LRD for micro data analysis.

Statistics are available on a sample universe of manufacturing establishments with one or more paid employees at any time

during the year for manufacturing classified in NAICS sectors 31–33. Employment, payroll, hours, cost of materials, receipts,

value added, capital expenditures, and relative standard errors data are available for the U.S. and states at the 2- through 4-

digit NAICS levels. Product shipments value data are available at the 6-digit North American Industry Classification System

(NAICS) level and 7-digit NAICS product class levels based on NAICS.

The ASM is conducted annually, except for years ending in 2 and 7, at which time ASM data are included in the manufacturing

sector of the Economic Census.

Consolidated (or Combined) Statistical Area (CSA) - Consolidated Statistical Areas are a combination of metropolitan areas that have significant economic interaction and

dependency. PrintStats includes the top five CSAs in each report based on total population, without regard to the number of

industry establishments. These CSAs are very large, and in fact, larger than many countries. These are the details of their

composition:

• New York CSA is the combination of these Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas: New York-Newark-

Jersey City, Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, New Haven-Milford, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Trenton,

Torrington, Kingston, East Stroudsburg

• Los Angeles CSA includes: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Oxnard-

Thousand Oaks-Ventura

• Chicago CSA includes: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ottawa-Peru, Kankakee, Michigan City-La Porte

• Washington D.C. CSA includes: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Baltimore-Columbia-

Towson, Hagerstown-Martinsburg, Chambersburg-Waynesboro, Winchester, California-Lexington Park, Easton,

Cambridge

• San Francisco CSA includes: San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Stockton-Lodi,

Santa Rosa, Vallejo-Fairfield, Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Napa

(see also Metropolitan Statistical Area)

Content Creation (Source) - The contribution of information to any medium/media, especially to digital media for an end-user/audience in specific

contexts. “Content” can be text, photographic images, illustrations, graphic design, video, or any other intellectual property.

Typical forms of modern content creation include maintaining and updating web sites, blogging, photography, videography,

online commentary, the maintenance of social media accounts, and editing and distribution of digital media.

County Business Patterns [CBP] (Source) - CBP is an annual series that provides subnational economic data by industry. This series includes the number of

establishments, employment during the week of March 12, first quarter payroll, and annual payroll.

11

https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/Annual-Survey-of-Manufactures.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_creation

https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html

NAICS 3222 + 32611

Key Terms and Definitions (continued)

Demographics (Source) - The statistical characteristics of human populations (such as age or income) used especially to identify markets. In business, a

particular market or segment of the population.

Economic Census (Source) - The Economic Census is the U.S. Government's official five-year measure of American business and the economy. It is

conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, and response is required by law.

Employee (Source) - An individual hired by another individual or business usually for wages or salary and in a position below the executive level.

Establishment (Source) - An establishment is a single physical location at which business is conducted or where services or industrial operations are

performed. It is not necessarily identical with a company or enterprise, which may consist of one or more establishments.

Estimate (Source) - A value that is usable for some purpose even if input data may be incomplete, uncertain, or unstable. The value is nonetheless

usable because it is derived from the best information available. Typically, deriving an estimate involves using the value of a

statistic derived from a sample to estimate the value of a corresponding population parameter. The sample provides

information that can be projected, through various formal or informal processes, to determine a range most likely to describe

the missing information.

Forecast (Source) - Forecasting is the use of historic data to determine the direction of future trends. Businesses use forecasting to determine

how to allocate their budgets or plan for anticipated expenses for an upcoming period of time. This is typically based on the

projected demand for the goods and services they offer.

In terms of PrintStats, the forecasts are limited to statistical trends based on past statistical data. They are not forecasts based

on industry surveys or assessment of economic, social, or technological changes. The PrintStats forecast data should be

viewed only as a starting point for a formal forecast process.

M3 Manufacturing Survey (Source) - The Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders (M3) survey provides broad-based, monthly statistical data on

economic conditions in the domestic manufacturing sector. The survey measures current industrial activity and provides an

indication of future business trends.

Metropolitan Area (Source) - A metropolitan area, sometimes referred to as a metro area or commuter belt, is a region consisting of a densely populated

urban core and its less-populated surrounding territories, sharing industry, infrastructure, and housing. A metro area usually

comprises multiple jurisdictions and municipalities: neighborhoods, townships, boroughs, cities, towns, exurbs, suburbs,

counties, districts, states, and even nations like the eurodistricts. As social, economic, and political institutions have changed,

metropolitan areas have become key economic and political regions. Metropolitan areas include one or more urban areas, as

well as satellite cities, towns, and intervening rural areas that are socio-economically tied to the urban core, typically

measured by commuting patterns.

12

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/demographic#h2

https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/employee

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/note/BZA010215

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimation

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/forecasting.asp

https://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/index.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_area

NAICS 3222 + 32611


Metropolitan Statistical Area [MSA] (Source) - In the United States, a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is a geographical region with a relatively high population density at

its core and close economic ties throughout the area. Such regions are neither legally incorporated as a city or town would

be, nor are they legal administrative divisions like counties or separate entities such as states. As such, the precise definition

of any given metropolitan area can vary with the source. A typical metropolitan area is centered on a single large city that

wields substantial influence over the region (e.g., Chicago or Atlanta). However, some metropolitan areas contain more than

one large city with no single municipality holding a substantially dominant position (e.g., Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex,

Norfolk-Virginia Beach [Hampton Roads], Riverside–San Bernardino [Inland Empire], or Minneapolis–Saint Paul).

MSAs are defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and used by the Census Bureau and other Federal

government agencies for statistical purposes.

(See also Consolidated Statistical Area)

NAICS (Source) - The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying

business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business

economy.

Nonemployer Statistics (Source) - Nonemployer Statistics is an annual series that provides subnational economic data for businesses that have no paid

employees and are subject to Federal income tax. The data consist of the number of businesses and total receipts by industry.

Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals operating unincorporated businesses (known as sole proprietorships),

which may or may not be the owner's principal source of income.

The majority of all business establishments in the United States are nonemployers, yet these firms average less than 4

percent of all sales and receipts nationally. Due to their small economic impact, these firms are excluded from most other

Census Bureau business statistics (the primary exception being the Survey of Business Owners). The Nonemployers Statistics

series is the primary resource available to study the scope and activities of nonemployers at a detailed geographic level. For

complementary statistics on the firms that do have paid employees, refer to the County Business Patterns. Additional sources

of data on small businesses include the Economic Census, and the Statistics of U.S. Businesses.

Packaging (Source) - Packaging is the technology of enclosing or protecting products for distribution, storage, sale, and use. Packaging also refers

to the process of designing, evaluating, and producing packages. Packaging can be described as a coordinated system of

preparing goods for transport, warehousing, logistics, sale, and end use. In the graphic arts, packaging refers to the design,

manufacturing, and decoration (usually via printing and related technologies) of corrugated paperboard containers, folding

cardboard cartons and containers, paper bags, flexible plastic packaging, and other paper, paperboard, and plastic materials.

Payroll (Source) - Payroll is the sum total of all compensation a business must pay to its employees for a set period of time or on a given date.

Payroll is reported before deductions for social security, income tax, insurance, union dues, etc. This definition of payroll is

the same as that used by the Internal Revenue Service.

13

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area

https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/

https://www.census.gov/econ/nonemployer/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packaging_and_labeling

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/payroll.asp#ixzz4k067CKNT http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/payroll.asp

NAICS 3222 + 32611


Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages [QCEW] (Source) - The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program publishes a quarterly count of employment and wages

reported by employers covering more than 95 percent of U.S. jobs, available at the county, MSA, state, and national levels by

industry.

Quarterly Services Survey (Source) - The Quarterly Services Survey (QSS) is the only source of service industry indicator performance providing timely estimates

of revenue and expenses for selected service industries. The QSS is a principal economic indicator series that produces, for

selected service industries, quarterly estimates of total operating revenue and the percentage of revenue by class of

customer (government, business, consumers, and individuals). The survey also produces estimates of total operating

expenses from tax-exempt firms in industries that have a large not-for-profit component. In addition, for hospital services,

the survey estimates the number of inpatient days and discharges.

Region (Source) - Census Regions are groupings of states and the District of Columbia that subdivide the United States for the presentation of

Census data. There are four Census regions—Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Each of the four Census regions is

divided into two or more Census divisions. Each Census region is identified by a single-digit Census code. Puerto Rico and

the Island Areas are not part of any Census region or Census division.

PrintStats uses eight regions based on industrial economic activity rather than the Census regions. The 50 U.S. states and

District of Columbia are allocated as follows:

• New England: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont

• Mid-Eastern: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia

• South Eastern: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,

Virginia

• Great Lakes: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin

• North Central: Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming

• South Central: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas

• South Western: Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah

• Western: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington

14

https://www.bls.gov/cew/

https://www.census.gov/econ/overview/se0600.html

https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_census_divreg.html

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611)

Baseline data from County Business Patterns

This workbook contains the following datasheets (click to open)

Establishments 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Establishments 2013 (Summarized Size Classes)Establishments 2015 Changes (Summarized Size Classes)Establishments 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Establishments 2013 (Detailed Size Classes)Establishments 2015 Changes (Detailed Size Classes)Employees 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Employees 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Payrolls 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Payrolls 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Sales 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Sales 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Capital Expenditures 2015 (Summarized Size Classes)Capital Expenditures 2015 (Detailed Size Classes)Top 15 States 2015 Top 25 Metros 2015 Top 5 Major Metropolitan Areas (Combined Statistical Areas)Estimates and Statistical Trend 2016-2022

email: [email protected]

Produced exclusively for NPESCopyright 2017, Non-Routine LLC and Strategies for Management, Inc.

15

mailto:[email protected]?subject=CBP%252$naics_code

% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9

Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

Avg. Employees/

Estab.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 5,046 1,174 1,803 2,069 68.5

New England 5.4% 6 272 70 105 97 55.0 Connecticut 1.2% 22 59 14 21 24 40.6 Maine 0.3% 39 14 3 4 7 105.5 Massachusetts 2.7% 15 136 32 53 51 63.1 New Hampshire 0.5% 37 24 7 13 4 29.2 Rhode Island 0.7% 34 37 14 12 11 47.8 Vermont 0.0% 48 2 2 17.0

Mid-Eastern 15.5% 3 780 202 291 287 63.5 Delaware 0.2% 42 12 5 3 4 42.3 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.9% 31 45 9 21 15 74.9 New Jersey 3.8% 8 193 60 69 64 47.0 New York 5.1% 6 258 79 102 77 52.8 Pennsylvania 5.2% 5 263 47 94 122 87.1 West Virginia 0.2% 44 9 2 2 5 7.6

South Eastern 20.3% 2 1,025 213 322 490 75.4 Alabama 1.1% 24 57 6 17 34 89.8 Florida 2.9% 14 145 64 47 34 37.0 Georgia 3.1% 12 158 28 54 76 77.2 Kentucky 1.8% 19 91 12 28 51 106.2 Mississippi 1.1% 25 55 13 19 23 50.3 North Carolina 3.7% 9 189 24 55 110 84.2 South Carolina 1.7% 21 86 17 27 42 83.0 Tennessee 3.0% 13 150 26 47 77 73.6 Virginia 1.9% 18 94 23 28 43 86.1

Great Lakes 27.6% 1 1,395 274 518 603 73.9 Illinois 6.5% 3 330 71 117 142 72.9 Indiana 3.2% 11 159 22 57 80 81.5 Michigan 3.2% 10 163 39 60 64 61.8 Minnesota 2.5% 17 124 32 49 43 68.2 Ohio 7.3% 2 366 72 147 147 59.6 Wisconsin 5.0% 7 253 38 88 127 101.8

North Central 5.3% 7 267 48 103 116 70.6 Idaho 0.2% 43 11 3 3 5 44.9 Iowa 1.1% 25 55 6 21 28 83.0 Kansas 0.6% 35 31 8 8 15 84.6 Missouri 2.5% 16 126 19 56 51 72.1 Montana 0.0% 48 2 1 1 16.5 Nebraska 0.4% 38 20 4 6 10 64.2 North Dakota 0.1% 45 6 4 1 1 13.2 South Dakota 0.3% 40 13 2 6 5 52.8 Wyoming 0.1% 47 3 2 1 0.7

South Central 9.1% 5 460 116 152 192 77.8 Arkansas 1.1% 23 58 6 21 31 119.1 Louisiana 1.0% 29 48 6 18 24 68.4 Oklahoma 0.9% 32 43 15 10 18 67.5 Texas 6.2% 4 311 89 103 119 73.0

South Western 3.7% 8 185 59 67 59 54.0 Arizona 0.9% 32 43 10 19 14 48.3 Colorado 1.0% 27 50 18 18 14 33.1 Nevada 0.6% 35 31 13 8 10 60.0 New Mexico 0.3% 40 13 5 5 3 32.8 Utah 1.0% 29 48 13 17 18 82.8

Western 13.1% 4 662 192 245 225 51.2 Alaska 0.0% 50 1 1 7.0 California 10.2% 1 516 145 198 173 51.1 Hawaii 0.1% 45 6 4 2 9.2 Oregon 1.0% 27 50 19 18 13 42.3 Washington 1.8% 20 89 23 27 39 59.7

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of

Establishments

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015

Number of Establishments

16


Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

Avg. Employees/

Estab.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 5,275 1,276 1,929 2,070 65.1

New England 5.4% 6 286 69 113 104 52.6 Connecticut 1.3% 22 68 16 27 25 42.8 Maine 0.2% 41 12 5 7 107.4 Massachusetts 2.7% 14 145 34 54 57 62.7 New Hampshire 0.5% 37 26 7 14 5 30.8 Rhode Island 0.6% 34 32 12 10 10 28.8 Vermont 0.1% 47 3 3 11.0

Mid-Eastern 15.6% 3 825 221 313 291 59.6 Delaware 0.2% 44 10 2 3 5 57.0 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.9% 32 47 10 23 14 62.6 New Jersey 3.8% 8 201 62 74 65 44.0 New York 5.2% 6 275 87 106 82 50.8 Pennsylvania 5.3% 5 280 55 104 121 81.0 West Virginia 0.2% 41 12 5 3 4 16.8

South Eastern 20.4% 2 1,074 227 349 498 70.7 Alabama 1.2% 24 62 9 23 30 71.9 Florida 2.9% 13 153 62 56 35 31.6 Georgia 3.2% 12 169 23 57 89 78.2 Kentucky 1.9% 19 99 13 29 57 103.0 Mississippi 1.0% 27 53 9 22 22 58.2 North Carolina 3.7% 9 197 31 60 106 75.5 South Carolina 1.9% 18 100 22 30 48 78.8 Tennessee 2.7% 14 145 32 46 67 69.9 Virginia 1.8% 20 96 26 26 44 75.8

Great Lakes 27.5% 1 1,450 304 560 586 66.4 Illinois 6.2% 3 327 72 122 133 70.1 Indiana 3.4% 10 178 30 69 79 73.0 Michigan 3.4% 11 177 43 75 59 44.2 Minnesota 2.7% 16 140 39 55 46 45.7 Ohio 7.0% 2 367 73 151 143 56.7 Wisconsin 4.9% 7 261 47 88 126 97.1

North Central 5.2% 7 273 63 94 116 65.1 Idaho 0.2% 41 12 3 4 5 40.8 Iowa 1.1% 25 59 11 20 28 72.5 Kansas 0.6% 35 31 6 10 15 81.9 Missouri 2.4% 17 124 25 49 50 69.4 Montana 0.0% 49 2 2 16.5 Nebraska 0.4% 38 21 6 4 11 52.8 North Dakota 0.1% 46 6 4 1 1 13.7 South Dakota 0.3% 40 15 6 3 6 42.7 Wyoming 0.1% 47 3 2 1 0.3

South Central 9.1% 5 479 114 174 191 68.5 Arkansas 1.2% 23 65 7 29 29 78.0 Louisiana 1.0% 29 52 8 23 21 62.4 Oklahoma 0.9% 33 45 16 10 19 50.3 Texas 6.0% 4 317 83 112 122 70.1

South Western 3.7% 8 197 67 71 59 46.7 Arizona 0.9% 30 49 13 21 15 45.1 Colorado 1.0% 27 53 19 20 14 34.7 Nevada 0.6% 36 30 12 9 9 50.0 New Mexico 0.3% 39 16 7 6 3 18.0 Utah 0.9% 30 49 16 15 18 68.4

Western 13.1% 4 691 211 255 225 46.8 Alaska 0.0% 49 2 2 3.5 California 10.2% 1 539 157 207 175 48.3 Hawaii 0.1% 45 7 5 2 8.9 Oregon 1.0% 26 54 24 16 14 20.8 Washington 1.7% 21 89 23 30 36 57.6


Establishments


Number of Establishments

17

Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9

Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

Avg. Employees/

Estab.

U.S. states + DC - (229) (102) (126) (1) 3.4

New England 3 (14) 1 (8) (7) 2.4 Connecticut 14 (9) (2) (6) (1) (2.1)Maine 3 2 3 (1) (1.9)Massachusetts 15 (9) (2) (1) (6) 0.4 New Hampshire 7 (2) (1) (1) (1.7)Rhode Island 1 5 2 2 1 19.0 Vermont 6 (1) (1) 6.0

Mid-Eastern 6 (45) (19) (22) (4) 3.9 Delaware 4 2 3 (1) (14.7)Washington DC 5 Maryland 8 (2) (1) (2) 1 12.3 New Jersey 13 (8) (2) (5) (1) 3.1 New York 18 (17) (8) (4) (5) 2.0 Pennsylvania 19 (17) (8) (10) 1 6.1 West Virginia 8 (3) (3) (1) 1 (9.3)

South Eastern 7 (49) (14) (27) (8) 4.7 Alabama 10 (5) (3) (6) 4 18.0 Florida 14 (8) 2 (9) (1) 5.4 Georgia 15 (11) 5 (3) (13) (0.9)Kentucky 14 (8) (1) (1) (6) 3.2 Mississippi 4 2 4 (3) 1 (8.0)North Carolina 14 (8) (7) (5) 4 8.8 South Carolina 16 (14) (5) (3) (6) 4.2 Tennessee 2 5 (6) 1 10 3.7 Virginia 8 (2) (3) 2 (1) 10.3

Great Lakes 8 (55) (30) (42) 17 7.5 Illinois 2 3 (1) (5) 9 2.8 Indiana 19 (19) (8) (12) 1 8.5 Michigan 17 (14) (4) (15) 5 17.6 Minnesota 17 (16) (7) (6) (3) 22.5 Ohio 7 (1) (1) (4) 4 2.9 Wisconsin 14 (8) (9) 1 4.7

North Central 1 (6) (15) 9 5.5 Idaho 7 (1) (1) 4.2 Iowa 9 (4) (5) 1 10.5 Kansas 6 2 (2) 2.7 Missouri 4 2 (6) 7 1 2.7 Montana 6 (1) 1 Nebraska 7 (1) (2) 2 (1) 11.3 North Dakota 6 (0.5)South Dakota 8 (2) (4) 3 (1) 10.0 Wyoming 6 0.3

South Central 4 (19) 2 (22) 1 9.4 Arkansas 12 (7) (1) (8) 2 41.1 Louisiana 10 (4) (2) (5) 3 6.0 Oklahoma 8 (2) (1) (1) 17.2 Texas 11 (6) 6 (9) (3) 2.9

South Western 2 (12) (8) (4) 7.3 Arizona 12 (6) (3) (2) (1) 3.1 Colorado 9 (3) (1) (2) (1.6)Nevada 4 1 1 (1) 1 9.9 New Mexico 9 (3) (2) (1) 14.8 Utah 7 (1) (3) 2 14.3

Western 5 (29) (19) (10) 4.4 Alaska 7 (1) (1) 3.5 California 20 (23) (12) (9) (2) 2.9 Hawaii 7 (1) (1) 0.3 Oregon 10 (4) (5) 2 (1) 21.5 Washington 6 (3) 3 2.1

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Change in Number of

Establishments


Change in Number of Establishments

18

% of TotalRegion Rank

and State Rank

All Sizes 1-4Empls.

5-9 Empls.

10-19Empls.

20-49Empls.

50-99Empls.

100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

Avg. Employees/

Estab.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 5,046 710 464 647 1,156 925 932 167 45 68.5

New England 5.4% 6 272 47 23 38 67 55 33 6 3 55.0 Connecticut 1.2% 22 59 10 4 12 9 19 5 40.6 Maine 0.3% 39 14 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 1 105.5 Massachusetts 2.7% 15 136 20 12 19 34 23 22 5 1 63.1 New Hampshire 0.5% 37 24 3 4 1 12 3 1 29.2 Rhode Island 0.7% 34 37 12 2 4 8 8 2 1 47.8 Vermont 0.0% 48 2 1 1 17.0

Mid-Eastern 15.5% 3 780 122 80 116 175 119 135 27 6 63.5 Delaware 0.2% 42 12 4 1 1 2 1 3 42.3 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.9% 31 45 8 1 8 13 4 9 2 74.9 New Jersey 3.8% 8 193 43 17 28 41 33 29 2 47.0 New York 5.1% 6 258 42 37 50 52 32 37 7 1 52.8 Pennsylvania 5.2% 5 263 23 24 29 65 47 54 18 3 87.1 West Virginia 0.2% 44 9 2 2 2 3 7.6

South Eastern 20.3% 2 1,025 128 85 101 221 227 213 43 7 75.4 Alabama 1.1% 24 57 5 1 5 12 18 13 2 1 89.8 Florida 2.9% 14 145 48 16 20 27 16 16 2 37.0 Georgia 3.1% 12 158 14 14 12 42 37 33 5 1 77.2 Kentucky 1.8% 19 91 7 5 8 20 17 24 9 1 106.2 Mississippi 1.1% 25 55 8 5 4 15 16 7 50.3 North Carolina 3.7% 9 189 10 14 17 38 53 45 11 1 84.2 South Carolina 1.7% 21 86 10 7 6 21 21 16 4 1 83.0 Tennessee 3.0% 13 150 14 12 20 27 35 39 2 1 73.6 Virginia 1.9% 18 94 12 11 9 19 14 20 8 1 86.1

Great Lakes 27.6% 1 1,395 163 111 183 335 268 267 50 18 73.9 Illinois 6.5% 3 330 43 28 45 72 66 63 9 4 72.9 Indiana 3.2% 11 159 14 8 16 41 34 37 7 2 81.5 Michigan 3.2% 10 163 25 14 24 36 33 24 6 1 61.8 Minnesota 2.5% 17 124 16 16 18 31 14 25 3 1 68.2 Ohio 7.3% 2 366 43 29 56 91 74 63 8 2 59.6 Wisconsin 5.0% 7 253 22 16 24 64 47 55 17 8 101.8

North Central 5.3% 7 267 31 17 40 63 43 62 9 2 70.6 Idaho 0.2% 43 11 1 2 1 2 5 44.9 Iowa 1.1% 25 55 6 10 11 9 17 1 1 83.0 Kansas 0.6% 35 31 4 4 2 6 7 7 1 84.6 Missouri 2.5% 16 126 11 8 20 36 22 22 6 1 72.1 Montana 0.0% 48 2 1 1 16.5 Nebraska 0.4% 38 20 2 2 3 3 2 7 1 64.2 North Dakota 0.1% 45 6 3 1 1 1 13.2 South Dakota 0.3% 40 13 2 3 3 1 4 52.8 Wyoming 0.1% 47 3 2 1 0.7

South Central 9.1% 5 460 69 47 48 104 80 88 16 8 77.8 Arkansas 1.1% 23 58 5 1 7 14 9 14 6 2 119.1 Louisiana 1.0% 29 48 2 4 8 10 13 9 2 68.4 Oklahoma 0.9% 32 43 5 10 1 9 6 10 2 67.5 Texas 6.2% 4 311 57 32 32 71 52 55 6 6 73.0

South Western 3.7% 8 185 40 19 28 39 26 26 6 1 54.0 Arizona 0.9% 32 43 4 6 10 9 5 8 1 48.3 Colorado 1.0% 27 50 14 4 9 9 9 5 33.1 Nevada 0.6% 35 31 8 5 3 5 5 3 2 60.0 New Mexico 0.3% 40 13 3 2 2 3 2 1 32.8 Utah 1.0% 29 48 11 2 4 13 5 9 3 1 82.8

Western 13.1% 4 662 110 82 93 152 107 108 10 51.2 Alaska 0.0% 50 1 1 7.0 California 10.2% 1 516 84 61 73 125 81 83 9 51.1 Hawaii 0.1% 45 6 1 3 1 1 9.2 Oregon 1.0% 27 50 11 8 5 13 6 7 42.3 Washington 1.8% 20 89 14 9 14 13 20 18 1 59.7


Establishments

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Number of Establishments

19

% of TotalRegion Rank

and State Rank

All Sizes 1-4Empls.

5-9 Empls.

10-19Empls.

20-49Empls.

50-99Empls.

100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

Avg. Employees/

Estab.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 5,275 771 505 702 1,227 948 912 168 42 65.1

New England 5.4% 6 286 45 24 38 75 58 37 7 2 52.6 Connecticut 1.3% 22 68 11 5 13 14 16 9 42.8 Maine 0.2% 41 12 1 4 3 2 2 107.4 Massachusetts 2.7% 14 145 23 11 18 36 29 22 5 1 62.7 New Hampshire 0.5% 37 26 4 3 2 12 4 1 30.8 Rhode Island 0.6% 34 32 7 5 3 7 6 3 1 28.8 Vermont 0.1% 47 3 1 2 11.0

Mid-Eastern 15.6% 3 825 131 90 124 189 130 133 20 8 59.6 Delaware 0.2% 44 10 1 1 1 2 2 3 57.0 Washington DC 51 Maryland 0.9% 32 47 9 1 8 15 5 7 2 62.6 New Jersey 3.8% 8 201 39 23 28 46 38 27 44.0 New York 5.2% 6 275 48 39 48 58 40 35 4 3 50.8 Pennsylvania 5.3% 5 280 31 24 38 66 44 58 16 3 81.0 West Virginia 0.2% 41 12 3 2 1 2 1 3 16.8

South Eastern 20.4% 2 1,074 139 88 108 241 219 225 48 6 70.7 Alabama 1.2% 24 62 5 4 4 19 12 15 3 71.9 Florida 2.9% 13 153 46 16 25 31 19 15 1 31.6 Georgia 3.2% 12 169 13 10 17 40 43 38 7 1 78.2 Kentucky 1.9% 19 99 9 4 9 20 22 26 6 3 103.0 Mississippi 1.0% 27 53 5 4 7 15 13 8 1 58.2 North Carolina 3.7% 9 197 14 17 21 39 44 52 10 75.5 South Carolina 1.9% 18 100 12 10 4 26 20 19 8 1 78.8 Tennessee 2.7% 14 145 18 14 13 33 31 33 2 1 69.9 Virginia 1.8% 20 96 17 9 8 18 15 19 10 75.8

Great Lakes 27.5% 1 1,450 176 128 198 362 280 243 47 16 66.4 Illinois 6.2% 3 327 39 33 46 76 65 57 6 5 70.1 Indiana 3.4% 10 178 16 14 21 48 36 34 8 1 73.0 Michigan 3.4% 11 177 24 19 24 51 33 22 4 44.2 Minnesota 2.7% 16 140 23 16 21 34 19 23 2 2 45.7 Ohio 7.0% 2 367 46 27 65 86 80 53 8 2 56.7 Wisconsin 4.9% 7 261 28 19 21 67 47 54 19 6 97.1

North Central 5.2% 7 273 36 27 38 56 40 65 9 2 65.1 Idaho 0.2% 41 12 2 1 3 1 1 4 40.8 Iowa 1.1% 25 59 6 5 7 13 9 16 2 1 72.5 Kansas 0.6% 35 31 4 2 3 7 6 8 1 81.9 Missouri 2.4% 17 124 16 9 21 28 18 25 6 1 69.4 Montana 0.0% 49 2 2 16.5 Nebraska 0.4% 38 21 1 5 2 2 3 8 52.8 North Dakota 0.1% 46 6 2 2 1 1 13.7 South Dakota 0.3% 40 15 3 3 1 2 2 4 42.7 Wyoming 0.1% 47 3 2 1 0.3

South Central 9.1% 5 479 68 46 58 116 77 87 20 7 68.5 Arkansas 1.2% 23 65 3 4 9 20 7 13 7 2 78.0 Louisiana 1.0% 29 52 6 2 9 14 7 12 2 62.4 Oklahoma 0.9% 33 45 8 8 1 9 8 9 2 50.3 Texas 6.0% 4 317 51 32 39 73 55 53 9 5 70.1

South Western 3.7% 8 197 47 20 37 34 28 25 5 1 46.7 Arizona 0.9% 30 49 7 6 14 7 6 8 1 45.1 Colorado 1.0% 27 53 14 5 9 11 9 5 34.7 Nevada 0.6% 36 30 8 4 4 5 5 3 1 50.0 New Mexico 0.3% 39 16 5 2 3 3 2 1 18.0 Utah 0.9% 30 49 13 3 7 8 6 8 3 1 68.4

Western 13.1% 4 691 129 82 101 154 116 97 12 46.8 Alaska 0.0% 49 2 1 1 3.5 California 10.2% 1 539 100 57 83 124 92 72 11 48.3 Hawaii 0.1% 45 7 2 3 1 1 8.9 Oregon 1.0% 26 54 13 11 5 11 6 8 20.8 Washington 1.7% 21 89 13 10 12 18 18 17 1 57.6


Establishments

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2013Number of Establishments

20

Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4

Empls.5-9

Empls.10-19

Empls.20-49

Empls.50-99

Empls.100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

Avg. Employees/

Estab.

U.S. states + DC - (229) (61) (41) (55) (71) (23) 20 (1) 3 3.4

New England 3 (14) 2 (1) (8) (3) (4) (1) 1 2.4 Connecticut 14 (9) (1) (1) (1) (5) 3 (4) (2.1)Maine 3 2 2 1 (1) (1) 1 (1) 1 (1.9)Massachusetts 15 (9) (3) 1 1 (2) (6) 0.4 New Hampshire 7 (2) (1) 1 (1) (1) (1.7)Rhode Island 1 5 5 (3) 1 1 2 (1) 19.0 Vermont 6 (1) (1) 6.0

Mid-Eastern 6 (45) (9) (10) (8) (14) (11) 2 7 (2) 3.9 Delaware 4 2 3 (1) (14.7)Washington DC 5 Maryland 8 (2) (1) (2) (1) 2 12.3 New Jersey 13 (8) 4 (6) (5) (5) 2 2 3.1 New York 18 (17) (6) (2) 2 (6) (8) 2 3 (2) 2.0 Pennsylvania 19 (17) (8) (9) (1) 3 (4) 2 6.1 West Virginia 8 (3) (1) (2) (1) 1 (9.3)

South Eastern 7 (49) (11) (3) (7) (20) 8 (12) (5) 1 4.7 Alabama 10 (5) (3) 1 (7) 6 (2) (1) 1 18.0 Florida 14 (8) 2 (5) (4) (3) 1 1 5.4 Georgia 15 (11) 1 4 (5) 2 (6) (5) (2) (0.9)Kentucky 14 (8) (2) 1 (1) (5) (2) 3 (2) 3.2 Mississippi 4 2 3 1 (3) 3 (1) (1) (8.0)North Carolina 14 (8) (4) (3) (4) (1) 9 (7) 1 1 8.8 South Carolina 16 (14) (2) (3) 2 (5) 1 (3) (4) 4.2 Tennessee 2 5 (4) (2) 7 (6) 4 6 3.7 Virginia 8 (2) (5) 2 1 1 (1) 1 (2) 1 10.3

Great Lakes 8 (55) (13) (17) (15) (27) (12) 24 3 2 7.5 Illinois 2 3 4 (5) (1) (4) 1 6 3 (1) 2.8 Indiana 19 (19) (2) (6) (5) (7) (2) 3 (1) 1 8.5 Michigan 17 (14) 1 (5) (15) 2 2 1 17.6 Minnesota 17 (16) (7) (3) (3) (5) 2 1 (1) 22.5 Ohio 7 (1) (3) 2 (9) 5 (6) 10 2.9 Wisconsin 14 (8) (6) (3) 3 (3) 1 (2) 2 4.7

North Central 1 (6) (5) (10) 2 7 3 (3) 5.5 Idaho 7 (1) (1) 1 (2) 1 (1) 1 4.2 Iowa 9 (4) (5) 3 (2) 1 (1) 10.5 Kansas 6 2 (1) (1) 1 (1) 2.7 Missouri 4 2 (5) (1) (1) 8 4 (3) 2.7 Montana 6 (1) 1 Nebraska 7 (1) 1 (3) 1 1 (1) (1) 1 11.3 North Dakota 6 1 (1) (0.5)South Dakota 8 (2) (1) (3) 2 1 (1) 10.0 Wyoming 6 0.3

South Central 4 (19) 1 1 (10) (12) 3 1 (4) 1 9.4 Arkansas 12 (7) 2 (3) (2) (6) 2 1 (1) 41.1 Louisiana 10 (4) (4) 2 (1) (4) 6 (3) 6.0 Oklahoma 8 (2) (3) 2 (2) 1 17.2 Texas 11 (6) 6 (7) (2) (3) 2 (3) 1 2.9

South Western 2 (12) (7) (1) (9) 5 (2) 1 1 7.3 Arizona 12 (6) (3) (4) 2 (1) 3.1 Colorado 9 (3) (1) (2) (1.6)Nevada 4 1 1 (1) 1 9.9 New Mexico 9 (3) (2) (1) 14.8 Utah 7 (1) (2) (1) (3) 5 (1) 1 14.3

Western 5 (29) (19) (8) (2) (9) 11 (2) 4.4 Alaska 7 (1) (1) 3.5 California 20 (23) (16) 4 (10) 1 (11) 11 (2) 2.9 Hawaii 7 (1) (1) 0.3 Oregon 10 (4) (2) (3) 2 (1) 21.5 Washington 6 1 (1) 2 (5) 2 1 2.1

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Change in Number of

Establishments

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Change in Number of Establishments

21


Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 345,562 4,494 46,989 294,079

New England 4.4% 7 15,198 239 2,674 12,285 Connecticut 0.7% 31 2,398 43 441 1,914 Maine 0.5% 36 1,664 10 100 1,553 Massachusetts 2.5% 16 8,580 114 1,387 7,079 New Hampshire 0.2% 41 739 31 398 311 Rhode Island 0.5% 35 1,769 42 300 1,428 Vermont 0.0% 48 48 48

Mid-Eastern 14.6% 3 50,396 777 7,476 42,143 Delaware 0.2% 43 666 14 86 566 Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.0% 26 3,458 20 548 2,891 New Jersey 2.6% 15 9,078 207 1,750 7,121 New York 3.9% 8 13,616 339 2,462 10,816 Pennsylvania 6.6% 4 22,907 194 2,564 20,149 West Virginia 0.2% 42 671 4 66 601

South Eastern 22.4% 2 77,576 800 8,720 68,056 Alabama 1.5% 23 5,195 18 439 4,738 Florida 1.6% 21 5,369 183 1,152 4,034 Georgia 3.5% 10 12,202 126 1,647 10,429 Kentucky 2.8% 13 9,666 46 780 8,840 Mississippi 0.8% 29 2,766 51 574 2,141 North Carolina 4.7% 7 16,084 102 1,475 14,507 South Carolina 2.1% 19 7,170 72 728 6,369 Tennessee 3.2% 11 11,035 105 1,187 9,744 Virginia 2.3% 18 8,090 97 739 7,255

Great Lakes 29.8% 1 103,123 1,049 13,720 88,353 Illinois 7.0% 3 24,061 254 3,102 20,706 Indiana 3.8% 9 12,961 79 1,558 11,325 Michigan 2.9% 12 10,072 144 1,551 8,376 Minnesota 2.4% 17 8,458 137 1,254 7,067 Ohio 6.3% 6 21,828 276 3,805 17,747 Wisconsin 7.4% 2 25,743 161 2,450 23,132

North Central 5.7% 6 19,761 184 2,640 16,937 Idaho 0.2% 39 817 16 84 717 Iowa 1.3% 24 4,567 10 485 4,072 Kansas 0.8% 30 2,622 43 269 2,310 Missouri 2.6% 14 9,089 75 1,455 7,559 Montana 0.0% 46 104 33 71 Nebraska 0.5% 38 1,637 20 140 1,477 North Dakota 0.0% 45 117 12 33 72 South Dakota 0.2% 40 790 4 127 659 Wyoming 0.0% 49 18 4 14

South Central 10.4% 4 35,955 466 4,028 31,461 Arkansas 2.0% 20 6,906 14 608 6,284 Louisiana 1.0% 27 3,436 33 446 2,957 Oklahoma 0.8% 28 2,902 75 304 2,523 Texas 6.6% 5 22,711 344 2,670 19,697

South Western 2.9% 8 10,095 186 1,549 8,360 Arizona 0.6% 32 2,181 43 393 1,745 Colorado 0.5% 37 1,655 47 375 1,232 Nevada 0.5% 34 1,859 47 210 1,602 New Mexico 0.1% 44 428 19 113 296 Utah 1.1% 25 3,972 30 458 3,484

Western 9.8% 5 33,881 793 6,151 26,937 Alaska 0.0% 50 7 7 California 7.6% 1 26,384 594 4,993 20,797 Hawaii 0.0% 47 62 22 40 Oregon 0.6% 33 2,116 82 499 1,536 Washington 1.5% 22 5,312 89 619 4,604

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of Employees


Number of Employees

22

% of Total Region Rank and State Rank All Sizes 1-4

Empls.5-9

Empls.10-19

Empls.20-49

Empls.50-99

Empls.100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 345,562 1,313 3,181 9,078 37,911 66,742 136,665 56,596 34,076

New England 4.4% 7 15,198 92 148 518 2,155 3,850 4,554 2,048 1,834 Connecticut 0.7% 31 2,398 20 24 154 287 1,286 627 Maine 0.5% 36 1,664 3 7 11 89 151 418 384 600 Massachusetts 2.5% 16 8,580 37 77 275 1,112 1,667 3,083 1,664 665 New Hampshire 0.2% 41 739 5 26 15 382 169 142 Rhode Island 0.5% 35 1,769 27 15 50 250 577 282 569 Vermont 0.0% 48 48 14 34

Mid-Eastern 14.6% 3 50,396 230 547 1,647 5,829 8,213 20,817 8,879 4,235 Delaware 0.2% 43 666 8 6 15 70 77 489 Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.0% 26 3,458 14 6 115 434 296 1,271 1,324 New Jersey 2.6% 15 9,078 85 122 393 1,357 2,304 4,299 518 New York 3.9% 8 13,616 83 256 712 1,749 2,105 5,382 2,549 780 Pennsylvania 6.6% 4 22,907 38 156 412 2,152 3,289 8,918 5,811 2,131 West Virginia 0.2% 42 671 4 66 143 458

South Eastern 22.4% 2 77,576 222 578 1,422 7,298 16,527 31,129 14,836 5,565 Alabama 1.5% 23 5,195 9 9 64 375 1,280 1,929 724 805 Florida 1.6% 21 5,369 77 106 293 859 1,177 2,220 637 Georgia 3.5% 10 12,202 22 104 178 1,469 2,779 5,362 1,555 732 Kentucky 2.8% 13 9,666 13 33 120 660 1,282 3,588 3,367 603 Mississippi 0.8% 29 2,766 15 35 55 519 1,208 934 North Carolina 4.7% 7 16,084 14 89 223 1,251 3,799 6,479 3,588 641 South Carolina 2.1% 19 7,170 19 53 88 640 1,539 2,260 1,376 1,194 Tennessee 3.2% 11 11,035 27 78 289 898 2,388 5,613 741 1,001 Virginia 2.3% 18 8,090 26 71 112 626 1,074 2,744 2,847 589

Great Lakes 29.8% 1 103,123 289 760 2,589 11,131 19,545 38,483 16,544 13,782 Illinois 7.0% 3 24,061 64 190 616 2,485 4,852 9,108 3,034 3,712 Indiana 3.8% 9 12,961 31 48 234 1,324 2,498 5,137 2,451 1,239 Michigan 2.9% 12 10,072 51 93 346 1,205 2,305 3,320 2,059 692 Minnesota 2.4% 17 8,458 27 110 258 996 1,062 3,414 836 1,755 Ohio 6.3% 6 21,828 76 200 800 3,005 5,361 8,901 2,300 1,185 Wisconsin 7.4% 2 25,743 41 120 335 2,115 3,466 8,603 5,864 5,199

North Central 5.7% 6 19,761 59 124 533 2,107 3,165 9,357 3,135 1,281 Idaho 0.2% 39 817 2 14 14 70 717 Iowa 1.3% 24 4,567 10 131 354 640 2,450 387 595 Kansas 0.8% 30 2,622 9 34 39 230 618 1,215 476 Missouri 2.6% 14 9,089 21 55 251 1,204 1,553 3,383 1,937 686 Montana 0.0% 46 104 33 71 Nebraska 0.5% 38 1,637 4 16 45 95 136 1,007 334 North Dakota 0.0% 45 117 5 7 33 72 South Dakota 0.2% 40 790 4 40 88 74 585 Wyoming 0.0% 49 18 4 14

South Central 10.4% 4 35,955 146 320 685 3,342 5,781 12,931 5,285 7,465 Arkansas 2.0% 20 6,906 7 7 101 507 650 2,268 2,052 1,313 Louisiana 1.0% 27 3,436 5 29 122 324 1,025 1,215 718 Oklahoma 0.8% 28 2,902 10 65 19 285 434 1,442 647 Texas 6.6% 5 22,711 125 219 443 2,227 3,672 8,006 1,867 6,151

South Western 2.9% 8 10,095 66 120 361 1,188 1,795 3,821 2,012 732 Arizona 0.6% 32 2,181 7 36 123 270 334 1,027 384 Colorado 0.5% 37 1,655 25 22 120 256 595 638 Nevada 0.5% 34 1,859 11 36 40 170 376 504 722 New Mexico 0.1% 44 428 5 13 26 87 131 165 Utah 1.1% 25 3,972 17 12 52 406 359 1,487 906 732

Western 9.8% 5 33,881 222 570 1,310 4,842 7,888 15,730 3,319 Alaska 0.0% 50 7 7 California 7.6% 1 26,384 171 423 1,024 3,970 5,883 12,028 2,885 Hawaii 0.0% 47 62 2 20 12 28 Oregon 0.6% 33 2,116 23 59 71 427 448 1,088 Washington 1.5% 22 5,312 27 62 202 417 1,558 2,613 433

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Number of Employees

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Number of Employees

23


Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $18,791 $247 $2,203 $16,340

New England 4.8% 7 $903 $14 $131 $758Connecticut 0.8% 28 $145 $2 $20 $123Maine 0.5% 37 $87 $1 $5 $81Massachusetts 2.7% 13 $515 $7 $71 $437New Hampshire 0.2% 40 $39 $2 $18 $19Rhode Island 0.6% 32 $114 $2 $13 $99Vermont 0.0% 48 $2 $2

Mid-Eastern 14.5% 3 $2,725 $41 $351 $2,334Delaware 0.2% 41 $36 $1 $4 $31Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.1% 26 $203 $2 $28 $174New Jersey 2.6% 15 $494 $11 $88 $395New York 3.7% 9 $695 $18 $105 $572Pennsylvania 6.7% 4 $1,261 $9 $122 $1,129West Virginia 0.2% 43 $35 $0 $3 $31

South Eastern 22.2% 2 $4,180 $42 $393 $3,745Alabama 1.6% 22 $291 $1 $21 $269Florida 1.7% 21 $322 $9 $55 $258Georgia 3.5% 10 $661 $7 $75 $580Kentucky 2.7% 14 $503 $2 $37 $464Mississippi 0.7% 29 $139 $2 $25 $111North Carolina 4.6% 7 $868 $6 $63 $799South Carolina 2.1% 19 $392 $4 $36 $352Tennessee 2.9% 11 $545 $6 $49 $490Virginia 2.4% 17 $459 $5 $32 $422

Great Lakes 30.6% 1 $5,756 $75 $652 $5,029Illinois 7.1% 3 $1,339 $34 $156 $1,149Indiana 3.9% 8 $725 $4 $75 $646Michigan 2.5% 16 $466 $6 $74 $385Minnesota 2.8% 12 $518 $6 $64 $448Ohio 6.2% 5 $1,167 $18 $170 $979Wisconsin 8.2% 1 $1,542 $8 $113 $1,421

North Central 5.4% 6 $1,008 $10 $118 $881Idaho 0.2% 39 $46 $1 $4 $41Iowa 1.3% 24 $249 $1 $23 $226Kansas 0.7% 31 $127 $2 $12 $113Missouri 2.4% 18 $458 $4 $65 $390Montana 0.0% 46 $5 $2 $4Nebraska 0.4% 38 $79 $1 $6 $73North Dakota 0.0% 45 $6 $1 $2 $4South Dakota 0.2% 42 $36 $0 $5 $30Wyoming 0.0% 49 $1 $0 $1

South Central 9.6% 5 $1,810 $22 $174 $1,613Arkansas 1.9% 20 $351 $1 $25 $326Louisiana 0.9% 27 $166 $1 $17 $147Oklahoma 0.7% 30 $133 $4 $11 $117Texas 6.2% 6 $1,160 $16 $121 $1,024

South Western 2.8% 8 $528 $9 $69 $451Arizona 0.6% 34 $110 $2 $17 $91Colorado 0.5% 35 $92 $2 $18 $71Nevada 0.5% 36 $91 $2 $10 $79New Mexico 0.1% 44 $22 $1 $5 $16Utah 1.1% 25 $213 $1 $18 $193

Western 10.1% 4 $1,893 $40 $293 $1,560Alaska 0.0% 50 $0 $0California 7.9% 2 $1,490 $30 $241 $1,218Hawaii 0.0% 47 $3 $1 $2Oregon 0.6% 33 $113 $4 $22 $87Washington 1.5% 23 $286 $4 $28 $254

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Payrolls


Total Payrolls ($Millions)

24


Empls.5-9

Empls.10-19

Empls.20-49

Empls.50-99

Empls.100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $18,791 $104 $143 $398 $1,805 $3,606 $7,662 $3,145 $1,928

New England 4.8% 7 $903 $5 $8 $24 $107 $226 $284 $130 $120Connecticut 0.8% 28 $145 $1 $1 $7 $13 $79 $43Maine 0.5% 37 $87 $0 $0 $1 $5 $9 $25 $22 $25Massachusetts 2.7% 13 $515 $2 $5 $13 $58 $96 $191 $107 $43New Hampshire 0.2% 40 $39 $1 $1 $1 $18 $12 $8Rhode Island 0.6% 32 $114 $1 $1 $2 $11 $30 $17 $51Vermont 0.0% 48 $2 $1 $2

Mid-Eastern 14.5% 3 $2,725 $16 $25 $77 $274 $452 $1,169 $477 $235Delaware 0.2% 41 $36 $1 $0 $1 $3 $4 $27Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.1% 26 $203 $1 $0 $6 $21 $17 $75 $83New Jersey 2.6% 15 $494 $5 $6 $20 $68 $131 $239 $25New York 3.7% 9 $695 $6 $12 $32 $73 $110 $276 $137 $49Pennsylvania 6.7% 4 $1,261 $3 $7 $17 $106 $182 $528 $315 $104West Virginia 0.2% 43 $35 $0 $3 $8 $24

South Eastern 22.2% 2 $4,180 $16 $26 $60 $332 $870 $1,718 $864 $293Alabama 1.6% 22 $291 $1 $0 $3 $18 $66 $96 $46 $61Florida 1.7% 21 $322 $4 $5 $13 $42 $67 $138 $53Georgia 3.5% 10 $661 $2 $4 $6 $68 $153 $293 $84 $50Kentucky 2.7% 14 $503 $1 $1 $5 $32 $60 $197 $177 $30Mississippi 0.7% 29 $139 $1 $1 $2 $24 $60 $52North Carolina 4.6% 7 $868 $2 $4 $10 $53 $204 $363 $207 $24South Carolina 2.1% 19 $392 $1 $3 $4 $32 $79 $116 $86 $70Tennessee 2.9% 11 $545 $3 $3 $14 $35 $120 $305 $42 $23Virginia 2.4% 17 $459 $2 $3 $4 $28 $61 $157 $169 $35

Great Lakes 30.6% 1 $5,756 $29 $46 $112 $540 $1,069 $2,215 $990 $755Illinois 7.1% 3 $1,339 $14 $20 $30 $127 $282 $524 $174 $169Indiana 3.9% 8 $725 $2 $2 $9 $66 $137 $274 $173 $62Michigan 2.5% 16 $466 $3 $3 $14 $61 $111 $168 $91 $15Minnesota 2.8% 12 $518 $2 $5 $13 $51 $60 $210 $55 $123Ohio 6.2% 5 $1,167 $7 $11 $31 $139 $274 $512 $120 $73Wisconsin 8.2% 1 $1,542 $3 $5 $16 $97 $206 $526 $377 $313

North Central 5.4% 6 $1,008 $5 $5 $21 $97 $173 $486 $161 $61Idaho 0.2% 39 $46 $0 $1 $1 $3 $41Iowa 1.3% 24 $249 $1 $5 $18 $45 $120 $24 $37Kansas 0.7% 31 $127 $1 $1 $1 $10 $28 $67 $18Missouri 2.4% 18 $458 $2 $2 $10 $54 $81 $181 $105 $23Montana 0.0% 46 $5 $2 $4Nebraska 0.4% 38 $79 $0 $1 $2 $4 $7 $51 $14North Dakota 0.0% 45 $6 $0 $0 $2 $4South Dakota 0.2% 42 $36 $0 $2 $4 $3 $27Wyoming 0.0% 49 $1 $0 $1

South Central 9.6% 5 $1,810 $9 $13 $27 $147 $289 $673 $244 $407Arkansas 1.9% 20 $351 $1 $0 $4 $20 $28 $107 $108 $84Louisiana 0.9% 27 $166 $0 $1 $4 $13 $50 $63 $34Oklahoma 0.7% 30 $133 $1 $4 $1 $11 $19 $72 $26Texas 6.2% 6 $1,160 $8 $8 $18 $103 $192 $432 $77 $323

South Western 2.8% 8 $528 $4 $5 $14 $54 $93 $210 $97 $50Arizona 0.6% 34 $110 $0 $1 $6 $12 $15 $54 $22Colorado 0.5% 35 $92 $1 $1 $4 $13 $35 $37Nevada 0.5% 36 $91 $1 $1 $2 $8 $20 $23 $36New Mexico 0.1% 44 $22 $0 $0 $1 $4 $7 $9Utah 1.1% 25 $213 $1 $0 $2 $16 $16 $88 $39 $50

Western 10.1% 4 $1,893 $14 $26 $54 $240 $439 $938 $182Alaska 0.0% 50 $0 $0California 7.9% 2 $1,490 $11 $19 $42 $199 $332 $726 $161Hawaii 0.0% 47 $3 $0 $1 $1 $1Oregon 0.6% 33 $113 $2 $3 $3 $20 $25 $62Washington 1.5% 23 $286 $1 $3 $8 $20 $83 $150 $22

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Payrolls

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Total Payrolls ($Millions)

25


Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $146,197 $1,421 $16,334 $128,442

New England 4.3% 7 $6,289 $78 $883 $5,328Connecticut 0.6% 32 $914 $15 $146 $752Maine 0.5% 35 $765 $4 $33 $728Massachusetts 2.5% 15 $3,637 $38 $453 $3,146New Hampshire 0.2% 42 $266 $11 $146 $110Rhode Island 0.5% 36 $692 $10 $90 $592Vermont 0.0% 48 $14 $14

Mid-Eastern 14.7% 3 $21,457 $242 $2,655 $18,560Delaware 0.2% 41 $278 $5 $30 $243Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.0% 26 $1,456 $6 $186 $1,265New Jersey 2.5% 16 $3,608 $59 $624 $2,925New York 3.9% 8 $5,745 $103 $856 $4,786Pennsylvania 6.9% 3 $10,110 $68 $933 $9,109West Virginia 0.2% 43 $259 $1 $27 $232

South Eastern 22.0% 2 $32,151 $256 $2,990 $28,905Alabama 1.5% 22 $2,145 $5 $153 $1,987Florida 1.5% 21 $2,156 $55 $399 $1,703Georgia 3.6% 10 $5,206 $46 $564 $4,596Kentucky 2.7% 14 $3,905 $14 $253 $3,638Mississippi 0.8% 29 $1,143 $16 $200 $928North Carolina 4.5% 7 $6,525 $36 $516 $5,973South Carolina 2.1% 20 $3,061 $23 $242 $2,796Tennessee 3.2% 11 $4,736 $33 $414 $4,290Virginia 2.2% 19 $3,274 $29 $250 $2,994

Great Lakes 30.2% 1 $44,198 $337 $4,838 $39,023Illinois 6.8% 5 $9,945 $81 $1,089 $8,775Indiana 3.7% 9 $5,406 $25 $562 $4,819Michigan 2.8% 12 $4,125 $49 $552 $3,524Minnesota 2.7% 13 $3,942 $40 $427 $3,474Ohio 6.0% 6 $8,811 $91 $1,338 $7,382Wisconsin 8.2% 1 $11,969 $50 $871 $11,048

North Central 5.5% 6 $8,092 $56 $924 $7,112Idaho 0.3% 39 $368 $6 $34 $329Iowa 1.4% 24 $2,017 $3 $174 $1,840Kansas 0.7% 30 $1,075 $12 $86 $977Missouri 2.5% 17 $3,595 $23 $509 $3,062Montana 0.0% 46 $41 $13 $27Nebraska 0.4% 37 $649 $6 $47 $597North Dakota 0.0% 45 $50 $5 $11 $34South Dakota 0.2% 40 $292 $1 $45 $246Wyoming 0.0% 49 $6 $1 $5

South Central 10.9% 4 $15,892 $148 $1,396 $14,348Arkansas 2.3% 18 $3,290 $4 $214 $3,072Louisiana 1.0% 27 $1,409 $9 $150 $1,250Oklahoma 0.8% 28 $1,214 $25 $98 $1,091Texas 6.8% 4 $9,978 $109 $934 $8,934

South Western 3.2% 8 $4,616 $55 $542 $4,019Arizona 0.7% 31 $1,029 $14 $134 $882Colorado 0.4% 38 $648 $15 $134 $499Nevada 0.6% 34 $856 $13 $80 $763New Mexico 0.1% 44 $183 $6 $41 $137Utah 1.3% 25 $1,899 $8 $153 $1,738

Western 9.4% 5 $13,778 $246 $2,094 $11,439Alaska 0.0% 50 $2 $2California 7.4% 2 $10,753 $184 $1,698 $8,871Hawaii 0.0% 47 $22 $8 $14Oregon 0.6% 33 $871 $26 $173 $671Washington 1.5% 23 $2,131 $26 $209 $1,896

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Sales


Value of Sales/Shipments ($Millions)

26


Empls.5-9

Empls.10-19

Empls.20-49

Empls.50-99

Empls.100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $146,197 $353 $1,069 $3,214 $13,120 $26,254 $57,795 $25,727 $18,666

New England 4.3% 7 $6,289 $24 $54 $174 $708 $1,474 $1,917 $1,015 $922Connecticut 0.6% 32 $914 $5 $11 $54 $92 $494 $258Maine 0.5% 35 $765 $1 $4 $4 $29 $59 $185 $273 $212Massachusetts 2.5% 15 $3,637 $11 $27 $91 $362 $643 $1,312 $742 $449New Hampshire 0.2% 42 $266 $1 $9 $4 $142 $64 $46Rhode Island 0.5% 36 $692 $6 $4 $17 $74 $214 $116 $262Vermont 0.0% 48 $14 $5 $9

Mid-Eastern 14.7% 3 $21,457 $59 $183 $577 $2,078 $3,174 $8,748 $3,942 $2,696Delaware 0.2% 41 $278 $2 $3 $5 $24 $29 $214Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.0% 26 $1,456 $4 $2 $42 $144 $121 $546 $597New Jersey 2.5% 16 $3,608 $21 $38 $137 $487 $896 $1,784 $245New York 3.9% 8 $5,745 $20 $83 $248 $608 $802 $2,232 $1,140 $612Pennsylvania 6.9% 3 $10,110 $10 $57 $145 $788 $1,271 $3,794 $2,557 $1,486West Virginia 0.2% 43 $259 $1 $27 $55 $177

South Eastern 22.0% 2 $32,151 $58 $198 $503 $2,486 $6,489 $12,817 $6,582 $3,018Alabama 1.5% 22 $2,145 $2 $3 $22 $131 $516 $801 $300 $370Florida 1.5% 21 $2,156 $19 $35 $104 $295 $477 $886 $339Georgia 3.6% 10 $5,206 $7 $39 $65 $499 $1,044 $2,189 $789 $574Kentucky 2.7% 14 $3,905 $3 $11 $37 $216 $511 $1,442 $1,408 $277Mississippi 0.8% 29 $1,143 $4 $12 $19 $181 $480 $448North Carolina 4.5% 7 $6,525 $4 $32 $79 $437 $1,468 $2,616 $1,623 $266South Carolina 2.1% 20 $3,061 $5 $18 $33 $209 $607 $1,020 $586 $584Tennessee 3.2% 11 $4,736 $7 $26 $103 $310 $956 $2,355 $303 $675Virginia 2.2% 19 $3,274 $7 $22 $42 $209 $431 $1,060 $1,233 $271

Great Lakes 30.2% 1 $44,198 $81 $255 $944 $3,895 $7,671 $16,331 $7,728 $7,292Illinois 6.8% 5 $9,945 $19 $62 $226 $862 $1,891 $3,882 $1,294 $1,708Indiana 3.7% 9 $5,406 $7 $18 $87 $475 $996 $2,176 $1,101 $547Michigan 2.8% 12 $4,125 $15 $33 $128 $424 $882 $1,441 $895 $306Minnesota 2.7% 13 $3,942 $7 $33 $93 $334 $430 $1,417 $394 $1,233Ohio 6.0% 6 $8,811 $22 $70 $294 $1,044 $2,119 $3,749 $978 $535Wisconsin 8.2% 1 $11,969 $11 $39 $116 $755 $1,352 $3,667 $3,066 $2,963

North Central 5.5% 6 $8,092 $16 $41 $188 $736 $1,279 $3,900 $1,288 $644Idaho 0.3% 39 $368 $0 $5 $4 $30 $329Iowa 1.4% 24 $2,017 $3 $46 $128 $261 $1,010 $168 $402Kansas 0.7% 30 $1,075 $2 $10 $15 $71 $240 $531 $207Missouri 2.5% 17 $3,595 $6 $17 $90 $420 $628 $1,408 $784 $242Montana 0.0% 46 $41 $13 $27Nebraska 0.4% 37 $649 $1 $5 $14 $32 $60 $408 $129North Dakota 0.0% 45 $50 $1 $3 $11 $34South Dakota 0.2% 40 $292 $1 $15 $31 $30 $216Wyoming 0.0% 49 $6 $1 $5

South Central 10.9% 4 $15,892 $40 $108 $233 $1,163 $2,283 $5,698 $2,378 $3,989Arkansas 2.3% 18 $3,290 $2 $2 $33 $181 $264 $970 $996 $842Louisiana 1.0% 27 $1,409 $1 $8 $39 $111 $408 $549 $293Oklahoma 0.8% 28 $1,214 $2 $23 $5 $93 $180 $631 $281Texas 6.8% 4 $9,978 $35 $74 $156 $779 $1,431 $3,548 $808 $3,147

South Western 3.2% 8 $4,616 $17 $38 $123 $419 $704 $1,671 $1,070 $574Arizona 0.7% 31 $1,029 $2 $12 $40 $94 $124 $486 $272Colorado 0.4% 38 $648 $7 $8 $42 $92 $238 $262Nevada 0.6% 34 $856 $3 $11 $14 $66 $139 $218 $406New Mexico 0.1% 44 $183 $2 $4 $9 $32 $56 $80Utah 1.3% 25 $1,899 $4 $4 $18 $136 $147 $625 $391 $574

Western 9.4% 5 $13,778 $61 $185 $468 $1,626 $3,196 $6,758 $1,485Alaska 0.0% 50 $2 $2California 7.4% 2 $10,753 $48 $136 $363 $1,335 $2,417 $5,157 $1,297Hawaii 0.0% 47 $22 $0 $7 $4 $10Oregon 0.6% 33 $871 $5 $21 $28 $146 $175 $497Washington 1.5% 23 $2,131 $7 $18 $72 $136 $604 $1,104 $188

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by Sales

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Value of Sales/Shipments ($Millions)

27


Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $3,614.4 $34.2 $390.0 $3,190.2

New England 4.1% 7 $149.1 $1.9 $20.0 $127.1Connecticut 0.7% 31 $24.1 $0.4 $3.7 $20.1Maine 0.4% 38 $15.6 $0.1 $0.7 $14.8Massachusetts 2.4% 17 $85.2 $0.9 $9.9 $74.4New Hampshire 0.2% 43 $5.8 $0.3 $3.4 $2.2Rhode Island 0.5% 36 $17.9 $0.3 $2.0 $15.7Vermont 0.0% 48 $0.4 $0.4

Mid-Eastern 14.0% 3 $507.2 $5.8 $62.3 $439.1Delaware 0.2% 41 $6.0 $0.1 $0.7 $5.2Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.0% 26 $36.3 $0.1 $4.4 $31.8New Jersey 2.5% 16 $88.7 $1.4 $14.4 $72.8New York 3.9% 9 $139.8 $2.4 $19.9 $117.6Pennsylvania 6.4% 5 $230.4 $1.7 $22.0 $206.6West Virginia 0.2% 42 $5.9 $0.0 $0.8 $5.1

South Eastern 22.9% 2 $826.5 $6.2 $72.3 $748.1Alabama 1.6% 21 $59.6 $0.1 $3.9 $55.5Florida 1.6% 22 $58.1 $1.3 $9.8 $47.0Georgia 3.5% 10 $126.2 $1.2 $13.7 $111.3Kentucky 2.8% 13 $99.8 $0.4 $6.2 $93.3Mississippi 0.8% 29 $28.6 $0.3 $4.8 $23.5North Carolina 4.8% 7 $174.4 $0.9 $12.2 $161.4South Carolina 2.1% 20 $76.2 $0.6 $5.5 $70.2Tennessee 3.4% 11 $121.2 $0.8 $10.2 $110.2Virginia 2.3% 18 $82.4 $0.7 $6.0 $75.8

Great Lakes 30.0% 1 $1,082.9 $8.1 $116.5 $958.3Illinois 7.0% 3 $253.1 $1.9 $26.7 $224.5Indiana 3.9% 8 $141.1 $0.6 $14.5 $126.0Michigan 3.0% 12 $107.1 $1.3 $13.8 $92.1Minnesota 2.5% 15 $92.0 $0.8 $10.4 $80.7Ohio 6.1% 6 $221.1 $2.2 $31.3 $187.6Wisconsin 7.4% 2 $268.4 $1.2 $19.8 $247.4

North Central 5.7% 6 $206.9 $1.4 $22.7 $182.9Idaho 0.2% 40 $8.5 $0.2 $0.7 $7.7Iowa 1.3% 24 $48.3 $0.1 $4.3 $43.9Kansas 0.7% 30 $25.7 $0.2 $1.9 $23.6Missouri 2.6% 14 $94.0 $0.6 $12.6 $80.8Montana 0.0% 46 $1.1 $0.4 $0.7Nebraska 0.5% 34 $18.5 $0.1 $1.1 $17.3North Dakota 0.0% 45 $1.8 $0.1 $0.3 $1.3South Dakota 0.2% 39 $9.0 $0.0 $1.3 $7.7Wyoming 0.0% 49 $0.1 $0.0 $0.1

South Central 10.7% 4 $387.9 $3.6 $34.9 $349.4Arkansas 2.1% 19 $76.4 $0.1 $5.6 $70.7Louisiana 1.0% 27 $36.0 $0.2 $3.7 $32.1Oklahoma 0.8% 28 $29.0 $0.6 $2.5 $25.9Texas 6.8% 4 $246.5 $2.7 $23.1 $220.7

South Western 2.9% 8 $105.3 $1.3 $12.5 $91.5Arizona 0.6% 32 $21.6 $0.3 $3.1 $18.1Colorado 0.5% 37 $17.7 $0.4 $3.1 $14.2Nevada 0.5% 35 $18.4 $0.3 $1.8 $16.4New Mexico 0.1% 44 $4.4 $0.1 $1.0 $3.3Utah 1.2% 25 $43.1 $0.2 $3.5 $39.4

Western 9.8% 5 $354.2 $5.9 $48.8 $299.5Alaska 0.0% 50 $0.0 $0.0California 7.7% 1 $277.8 $4.5 $39.7 $233.7Hawaii 0.0% 47 $0.5 $0.2 $0.3Oregon 0.6% 33 $21.2 $0.6 $4.1 $16.5Washington 1.5% 23 $54.6 $0.6 $4.6 $49.4

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by CapEx


Value of Capital Expenditure ($M)

28


Empls.5-9

Empls.10-19

Empls.20-49

Empls.50-99

Empls.100-249Empls.

250-499Empls.

500+Empls.

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - $3,614.4 $8.8 $25.4 $76.6 $313.4 $766.7 $1,380.3 $624.8 $418.4

New England 4.1% 7 $149.1 $0.6 $1.3 $4.0 $16.0 $40.5 $45.2 $22.2 $19.2Connecticut 0.7% 31 $24.1 $0.1 $0.3 $1.2 $2.5 $13.5 $6.6Maine 0.4% 38 $15.6 $0.0 $0.1 $0.1 $0.6 $2.2 $4.1 $4.8 $3.7Massachusetts 2.4% 17 $85.2 $0.3 $0.6 $2.1 $7.8 $16.9 $31.1 $17.4 $9.0New Hampshire 0.2% 43 $5.8 $0.0 $0.2 $0.1 $3.3 $1.4 $0.8Rhode Island 0.5% 36 $17.9 $0.1 $0.1 $0.3 $1.6 $6.5 $2.6 $6.5Vermont 0.0% 48 $0.4 $0.1 $0.2

Mid-Eastern 14.0% 3 $507.2 $1.4 $4.4 $13.6 $48.7 $90.5 $204.7 $89.9 $54.0Delaware 0.2% 41 $6.0 $0.0 $0.1 $0.1 $0.6 $0.7 $4.4Washington DC 51 Maryland 1.0% 26 $36.3 $0.1 $0.0 $1.1 $3.3 $3.2 $13.3 $15.3New Jersey 2.5% 16 $88.7 $0.5 $0.9 $3.2 $11.3 $24.7 $42.4 $5.7New York 3.9% 9 $139.8 $0.5 $1.9 $5.9 $14.0 $24.0 $53.1 $29.7 $10.7Pennsylvania 6.4% 5 $230.4 $0.3 $1.5 $3.3 $18.7 $36.4 $87.7 $54.5 $28.0West Virginia 0.2% 42 $5.9 $0.0 $0.8 $1.4 $3.7

South Eastern 22.9% 2 $826.5 $1.4 $4.8 $12.0 $60.3 $194.7 $314.6 $168.3 $70.4Alabama 1.6% 21 $59.6 $0.0 $0.1 $0.5 $3.4 $17.0 $20.3 $9.0 $9.3Florida 1.6% 22 $58.1 $0.4 $0.8 $2.5 $7.3 $14.8 $23.5 $8.7Georgia 3.5% 10 $126.2 $0.2 $1.0 $1.6 $12.1 $30.8 $51.9 $18.5 $10.0Kentucky 2.8% 13 $99.8 $0.1 $0.3 $0.8 $5.3 $13.9 $36.8 $35.6 $6.9Mississippi 0.8% 29 $28.6 $0.1 $0.3 $0.4 $4.4 $13.7 $9.8North Carolina 4.8% 7 $174.4 $0.1 $0.7 $1.9 $10.3 $43.5 $65.8 $42.7 $9.3South Carolina 2.1% 20 $76.2 $0.1 $0.4 $0.7 $4.8 $18.6 $22.7 $14.2 $14.6Tennessee 3.4% 11 $121.2 $0.2 $0.6 $2.6 $7.7 $29.5 $57.6 $9.5 $13.5Virginia 2.3% 18 $82.4 $0.2 $0.5 $1.0 $5.0 $12.8 $26.1 $30.1 $6.8

Great Lakes 30.0% 1 $1,082.9 $2.1 $6.0 $23.2 $93.3 $218.0 $384.6 $184.9 $170.8Illinois 7.0% 3 $253.1 $0.5 $1.4 $5.7 $21.0 $52.1 $91.7 $36.7 $44.0Indiana 3.9% 8 $141.1 $0.2 $0.5 $2.1 $12.4 $31.0 $51.9 $27.3 $15.8Michigan 3.0% 12 $107.1 $0.4 $0.9 $3.2 $10.6 $25.7 $35.2 $23.1 $8.0Minnesota 2.5% 15 $92.0 $0.2 $0.7 $2.4 $8.0 $12.4 $35.5 $8.2 $24.7Ohio 6.1% 6 $221.1 $0.6 $1.7 $7.1 $24.2 $63.1 $86.0 $24.8 $13.7Wisconsin 7.4% 2 $268.4 $0.3 $0.9 $2.6 $17.2 $33.7 $84.4 $64.8 $64.6

North Central 5.7% 6 $206.9 $0.4 $1.0 $4.6 $18.1 $38.5 $95.8 $36.3 $12.3Idaho 0.2% 40 $8.5 $0.0 $0.2 $0.1 $0.6 $7.7Iowa 1.3% 24 $48.3 $0.1 $1.0 $3.3 $8.2 $23.5 $4.2 $8.0Kansas 0.7% 30 $25.7 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $1.5 $6.3 $12.1 $5.2Missouri 2.6% 14 $94.0 $0.1 $0.4 $2.2 $10.4 $19.8 $34.7 $22.0 $4.2Montana 0.0% 46 $1.1 $0.4 $0.7Nebraska 0.5% 34 $18.5 $0.0 $0.1 $0.4 $0.7 $1.7 $10.7 $4.9North Dakota 0.0% 45 $1.8 $0.0 $0.1 $0.3 $1.3South Dakota 0.2% 39 $9.0 $0.0 $0.4 $0.9 $0.5 $7.2Wyoming 0.0% 49 $0.1 $0.0 $0.1

South Central 10.7% 4 $387.9 $1.0 $2.5 $5.6 $29.2 $66.5 $132.1 $59.3 $91.5Arkansas 2.1% 19 $76.4 $0.0 $0.0 $0.9 $4.7 $7.8 $21.5 $24.6 $16.7Louisiana 1.0% 27 $36.0 $0.0 $0.2 $0.8 $2.8 $11.0 $13.0 $8.1Oklahoma 0.8% 28 $29.0 $0.1 $0.6 $0.2 $2.4 $5.2 $13.7 $7.0Texas 6.8% 4 $246.5 $0.9 $1.8 $3.8 $19.3 $42.5 $83.9 $19.5 $74.8

South Western 2.9% 8 $105.3 $0.4 $0.9 $2.7 $9.8 $19.6 $39.5 $22.3 $10.1Arizona 0.6% 32 $21.6 $0.0 $0.3 $0.9 $2.2 $2.9 $10.4 $4.8Colorado 0.5% 37 $17.7 $0.2 $0.2 $1.0 $2.2 $7.8 $6.4Nevada 0.5% 35 $18.4 $0.1 $0.2 $0.3 $1.5 $3.1 $4.9 $8.4New Mexico 0.1% 44 $4.4 $0.0 $0.1 $0.2 $0.9 $1.9 $1.4Utah 1.2% 25 $43.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.4 $3.1 $3.8 $16.4 $9.2 $10.1

Western 9.8% 5 $354.2 $1.6 $4.3 $10.9 $37.9 $99.6 $164.1 $35.8Alaska 0.0% 50 $0.0 $0.0California 7.7% 1 $277.8 $1.3 $3.2 $8.4 $31.3 $76.8 $125.8 $31.1Hawaii 0.0% 47 $0.5 $0.0 $0.2 $0.1 $0.2Oregon 0.6% 33 $21.2 $0.1 $0.5 $0.8 $3.3 $5.5 $11.0Washington 1.5% 23 $54.6 $0.2 $0.4 $1.6 $3.0 $17.3 $27.3 $4.7

US States + District of Columbia Ranked by CapEx

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Value of Capital Expenditure ($M)

29

% of Total Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9 Empls.

Medium: 10-49 Empls.

Large: >50+ Empls.

Employees/Estab. Employees Payrolls ($MM) Sales ($MM) CapEx ($MM)

U.S. states + DC 100.0% - 5,046 1,174 1,803 2,069 68.5 345,562 $18,791 $146,197 $3,614California 10.2% 1 516 145 198 173 51.1 26,384 $1,490 $10,753 $278Ohio 7.3% 2 366 72 147 147 59.6 21,828 $1,167 $8,811 $221Illinois 6.5% 3 330 71 117 142 72.9 24,061 $1,339 $9,945 $253Texas 6.2% 4 311 89 103 119 73.0 22,711 $1,160 $9,978 $246Pennsylvania 5.2% 5 263 47 94 122 87.1 22,907 $1,261 $10,110 $230New York 5.1% 6 258 79 102 77 52.8 13,616 $695 $5,745 $140Wisconsin 5.0% 7 253 38 88 127 101.8 25,743 $1,542 $11,969 $268New Jersey 3.8% 8 193 60 69 64 47.0 9,078 $494 $3,608 $89North Carolina 3.7% 9 189 24 55 110 84.2 16,084 $868 $6,525 $174Michigan 3.2% 10 163 39 60 64 61.8 10,072 $466 $4,125 $107Indiana 3.2% 11 159 22 57 80 81.5 12,961 $725 $5,406 $141Georgia 3.1% 12 158 28 54 76 77.2 12,202 $661 $5,206 $126Tennessee 3.0% 13 150 26 47 77 73.6 11,035 $545 $4,736 $121Florida 2.9% 14 145 64 47 34 37.0 5,369 $322 $2,156 $58Massachusetts 2.7% 15 136 32 53 51 63.1 8,580 $515 $3,637 $85

Top 15 US States Ranked by Number of Establishments

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 2015Employees, Payrolls ($MM), Sales ($MM), CapEx ($MM)

30

% of Total Rank All Sizes Small: 1-9 Empls.

Medium: 10-49 Empls.

Large: >50+ Empls.

Employees/Estab. Employees Payrolls ($MM) Sales ($MM) CapEx ($MM)

US Total 100.0% - 5,046 1,174 1,803 2,069 68.5 345,562 $18,791 $146,197 $3,614New York-Newark-Jersey City 5.9% 1 300 101 116 83 44.8 13,445 $728 $5,626 $131Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 5.6% 2 285 61 99 125 71.6 20,413 $1,204 $8,416 $214Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim 4.9% 3 249 62 105 82 50.3 12,516 $713 $5,102 $129Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 2.6% 4 130 32 39 59 76.6 9,964 $521 $4,236 $107Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington 2.1% 5 105 26 40 39 73.1 7,671 $510 $3,441 $82Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington 1.9% 6 96 23 38 35 58.3 5,599 $336 $2,260 $56Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell 1.8% 7 91 17 30 44 73.2 6,663 $378 $2,649 $67Cincinnati 1.6% 8 83 16 36 31 69.2 5,746 $293 $2,308 $56Cleveland-Elyria 1.4% 9 70 16 32 22 46.9 3,461 $214 $1,286 $32Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario 1.3% 10 68 15 29 24 51.2 3,480 $179 $1,376 $36St. Louis 1.3% 10 68 14 28 26 58.7 3,994 $220 $1,562 $41Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land 1.3% 12 66 24 27 15 47.7 3,156 $159 $1,294 $33Boston-Cambridge-Newton 1.2% 13 63 12 33 18 43.5 2,743 $154 $1,058 $25Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis 1.1% 14 54 7 24 23 87.0 4,696 $269 $2,166 $49Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue 1.1% 15 53 15 17 21 51.8 2,745 $141 $1,061 $28

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach 1.1% 15 53 29 16 8 22.9 1,216 $61 $469 $13

Detroit-Warren-Dearborn 1.0% 17 51 16 20 15 51.2 2,609 $121 $1,050 $29Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia 1.0% 18 50 3 14 33 76.6 4,039 $213 $1,571 $46Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 1.0% 19 49 16 17 16 45.7 2,239 $116 $898 $22San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 1.0% 20 48 18 18 12 43.9 2,107 $131 $844 $21Kansas City 0.9% 21 45 10 13 22 77.2 3,472 $175 $1,355 $34Providence-Warwick 0.9% 22 44 16 15 13 48.6 2,139 $136 $837 $22Columbus 0.8% 23 40 6 12 22 82.0 3,281 $200 $1,400 $36Oshkosh-Neenah 0.8% 24 38 5 9 24 160.5 6,100 $393 $2,957 $69Louisville/Jefferson County 0.7% 25 37 6 8 23 84.3 3,119 $173 $1,188 $32

Top 25 US MSAs Ranked by Number of Establishments


A Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is a geographic entity defined by the Office of Management and Budget for use by federal statistical agencies. An MSA consists of the county or counties (or equivalent entities) that are associated with at least one urbanized area of at least 50,000 population, plus adjacent counties that have a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured through studies of worker and other commuting in the area.

31

% of Total Estabs Rank (Popn.) All Sizes Small: 1-9

Empls.Medium: 10-49

Empls.Large: >50+

Empls.Employees/

Estab. Employees Payrolls ($MM) Sales ($MM) CapEx ($MM)

US Total 100.0% - 5,046 1,174 1,803 2,069 68.5 345,562 $18,791 $146,197 $3,614New York 7.1% 1 357 115 137 105 43.8 16,436 $885 $6,776 $161Los Angeles 6.5% 2 330 83 138 109 49.8 16,463 $922 $6,668 $170Chicago 5.9% 3 300 64 105 131 69.0 21,073 $1,237 $8,658 $220Washington D.C. 1.0% 4 48 11 23 14 32.7 2,614 $140 $1,063 $26San Francisco 1.6% 5 82 27 32 23 45.3 3,942 $229 $1,578 $41

Chicago CSA includes: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ottawa-Peru, Kankakee, Michigan City-La PorteWashington D.C. CSA includes: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Hagerstown-Martinsburg, Chambersburg-Waynesboro, Winchester, California-Lexington Park, Easton, CambridgeSan Francisco CSA includes: San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Stockton-Lodi, Santa Rosa, Vallejo-Fairfield, Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Napa

Top 5 Combined Statistical Areas (CSA) ranked by Population


New York CSA is the combination of these Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas: New York-Newark-Jersey City, Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, New Haven-Milford, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Trenton, Torrington, Kingston, East StroudsburgLos Angeles CSA includes: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura

32

Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 215 50 81 84 215 49 81 85 212 48 79 84 199 43 74 81Mid-Eastern 604 147 212 245 594 142 210 244 599 141 210 249 588 129 208 249South Eastern 854 155 267 432 853 151 266 437 844 148 262 433 826 135 257 433Great Lakes 1,146 212 413 521 1,159 212 415 531 1,172 213 419 539 1,211 210 440 558North Central 220 32 86 102 220 31 84 104 219 31 85 103 219 29 86 105South Central 388 87 128 173 399 88 130 182 398 87 130 181 398 81 132 183South Western 135 40 47 48 145 42 48 53 138 40 46 52 131 36 44 51Western 520 141 180 199 518 140 179 199 522 140 180 204 524 131 181 210

Total 4,082 864 1,414 1,804 4,104 858 1,413 1,834 4,105 847 1,412 1,845 4,095 796 1,426 1,873

Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 12,531 162 2,067 10,301 12,033 151 1,937 9,945 12,148 148 1,901 10,096 11,588 125 1,705 9,758Mid-Eastern 39,955 580 5,437 33,940 40,079 570 5,396 34,111 39,964 555 5,371 34,038 39,964 500 5,535 33,928South Eastern 68,153 580 7,238 60,333 69,392 577 7,306 61,505 70,086 566 7,336 62,186 73,318 524 7,684 65,108Great Lakes 88,429 818 10,873 76,737 90,088 827 11,014 78,248 91,112 816 11,053 79,242 94,705 810 11,765 82,131North Central 16,851 126 2,132 14,594 16,829 122 2,096 14,609 16,745 119 2,088 14,539 16,560 107 2,115 14,337South Central 31,740 339 3,415 27,987 33,148 346 3,498 29,303 33,023 334 3,457 29,231 32,808 306 3,441 29,061South Western 7,273 126 1,138 6,008 7,096 121 1,077 5,900 7,016 119 1,038 5,858 6,829 117 1,010 5,703Western 29,314 605 4,704 24,006 29,600 599 4,673 24,329 29,160 588 4,622 23,950 29,160 570 4,759 23,833

Total 294,247 3,336 37,005 253,906 298,263 3,314 36,995 257,951 299,253 3,244 36,868 259,141 304,928 3,059 38,013 263,856

Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 776 10 103 663 744 9 97 638 754 9 96 649 723 8 88 627Mid-Eastern 2,234 31 269 1,934 2,241 30 266 1,944 2,236 29 265 1,941 2,242 28 274 1,940South Eastern 3,708 32 331 3,344 3,783 32 335 3,416 3,821 32 336 3,454 4,009 31 353 3,625Great Lakes 4,989 51 534 4,404 5,089 51 541 4,497 5,147 51 542 4,554 5,354 51 574 4,728North Central 886 6 98 781 885 6 97 782 881 6 96 779 870 5 98 767South Central 1,582 17 149 1,417 1,654 17 152 1,485 1,651 17 151 1,483 1,651 16 149 1,486South Western 371 6 52 313 362 6 50 307 358 6 48 304 345 6 46 293Western 1,670 29 233 1,408 1,687 29 232 1,426 1,659 28 229 1,402 1,652 28 235 1,390

Total 16,215 182 1,769 14,263 16,444 181 1,769 14,495 16,506 178 1,763 14,565 16,844 171 1,817 14,856

Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 5,211 54 681 4,476 5,253 53 675 4,525 5,210 51 667 4,492 4,881 43 629 4,209Mid-Eastern 16,453 185 1,907 14,361 16,267 178 1,868 14,221 16,436 175 1,883 14,378 16,069 153 1,886 14,030South Eastern 28,086 192 2,486 25,408 28,121 187 2,465 25,469 27,941 180 2,441 25,321 27,414 154 2,415 24,845Great Lakes 37,757 269 3,855 33,633 38,201 268 3,878 34,055 38,841 267 3,922 34,652 39,524 257 4,126 35,142North Central 7,065 41 756 6,269 7,151 40 754 6,357 7,129 39 754 6,337 7,117 34 766 6,316South Central 13,570 109 1,202 12,259 14,223 111 1,231 12,882 14,198 108 1,227 12,864 14,289 98 1,251 12,940South Western 2,980 39 401 2,541 3,305 42 420 2,844 3,141 39 403 2,699 2,977 35 386 2,555Western 12,162 192 1,616 10,354 12,112 190 1,600 10,322 12,317 188 1,614 10,515 12,391 176 1,641 10,575

Total 123,284 1,079 12,904 109,301 124,633 1,068 12,889 110,676 125,213 1,047 12,909 111,257 124,661 948 13,100 110,612

Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium Large Total Small Medium LargeNew England 130 2 16 112 132 2 17 114 131 2 16 113 123 1 16 107Mid-Eastern 420 5 49 366 416 5 48 363 420 5 49 366 410 4 49 357South Eastern 755 5 64 687 758 5 63 690 750 5 62 683 735 4 62 669Great Lakes 970 7 99 864 980 7 100 873 994 7 101 886 1,007 7 107 894North Central 189 1 20 168 191 1 20 170 191 1 20 170 190 1 20 169South Central 347 3 32 313 364 3 32 329 364 3 32 329 365 3 33 330South Western 77 1 10 66 85 1 11 73 81 1 10 70 77 1 10 66Western 326 5 40 281 325 5 40 280 331 5 40 286 335 5 41 289

Total 3,214 28 330 2,856 3,251 28 331 2,892 3,261 27 331 2,902 3,243 24 337 2,881

Shipments 2015 $MM Estimate 2016 $MM Estimate 2017 $MM Estimate 2022 $MM Forecast

Capex 2015 $MM Estimate 2016 $MM Estimate 2017 $MM Estimate 2022 $MM Forecast

Employment 2015 Actual 2016 Estimate 2017 Estimate 2022 Forecast

Payrolls 2015 $MM Actual 2016 $MM Estimate 2017 $MM Estimate 2022 $MM Forecast

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611), 20152015 Summary Data, 2016 and 2017 Estimated Data, 2022 Statistical Trend Forecast

Establishments 2015 Actual 2016 Estimate 2017 Estimate 2022 Forecast

33

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611)Establishments by State: All

34

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611)Establishments by MSA: All

35

Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing (NAICS 3222 + 32611)Total Establishments by Region

36

Available Reports

37

38. Converted Paper Product Manufacturing + Plastics Packaging

Materials and Unlaminated Film and Sheet Manufacturing

(NAICS 3222 + 32611)

Available Reports (continued)

38

Date post:	16-Apr-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	3 times
Download:	0 times

onverted Paper Product Manufacturing Plastics Packaging Materials … · 2017-09-01 · NAICS 3222...

Documents