Date post: | 16-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | allyson-kerry-walters |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Open Access and the Open Access and the HumanitiesHumanitiesA Continuing Education WebinarA Continuing Education Webinar
offered by the School of Library and Information Studies,offered by the School of Library and Information Studies,the iSchool at UW-Madison.the iSchool at UW-Madison.Jonathan Senchyne
Assistant Professor of Library and Information StudiesAssociate Director, Center for the History of Print and Digital
Culturetwitter: @jsench#oahumanities
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 2
Why?Why?
Discipline-specific conversations matter.
They matter especially in spaces of cross-disciplinary contact (such as the
library or the university as a whole) because confusion, misunderstanding,
and mistrust can occur.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 3
What is OA?What is OA?
“The free, immediate, online access to the results of scholarly
research, and the right to use and re-use those results as you need.” –
OpenAccessWeek.org
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 4
What are the humanities?What are the humanities?“The humanities can be described as how people process and document the human
experience.” – Stanford Humanities Center.
Also, a habitus of disciplinary practices for generating, debating, and sharing
knowledge in fields such as English, History, Philosophy, and so on.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 5
Related, but not central to Related, but not central to today’s conversation…today’s conversation…
Digital HumanitiesPublic Humanities
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 6
Case Study: Case Study: AHA and Dissertation AHA and Dissertation
EmbargoEmbargoSummer 2013 statement encouraging graduate schools and university libraries to permit students the
flexibility to embargo digital access to dissertations for as long as 6 years.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 7
AHA and Dissertation AHA and Dissertation EmbargoEmbargoLinks:
AHA Statement: http://blog.historians.org/2013/07/american-historical-association-statement-on-policies-regarding-the-embargoing-of-completed-history-phd-dissertations/
Q&A with then AHA President, Jacqueline Joneshttp://blog.historians.org/2013/07/qa-on-the-ahas-statement-on-embargoing-of-history-dissertations/
Reflection from Bill Cronon, UW-Madison History Professor/former AHA president
http://blog.historians.org/2013/07/why-put-at-risk-the-publishing-options-of-our-most-vulnerable-colleagues/
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 8
AHA and Dissertation EmbargoAHA and Dissertation EmbargoSome reactions:Some reactions:
Barbara Fister, academic librarian:
Books are what matters to historians and that will never change. Publishers are an immutable force of nature, as are tenure and
promotion committees. Librarians and program heads, however, can be told what to do. If they don’t change their ways “young historians” will lose the “unfettered ability . . . to revise their dissertations and obtain a publishing contract from a press"
because those pesky online dissertations are standing between a scholar and a fetter-free book contract. Turn the clock back. Put those printed dissertations on the shelf where they can be safely
obscure. Protect the children.
https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/library-babel-fish/aha-asks-what-about-children
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 9
AHA and Dissertation EmbargoAHA and Dissertation EmbargoSome reactions:Some reactions:Mark Sample, @samplereality
“Disembargo”http://disembargo.aws.af.cm/
http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/disembargo-an-open-access-dissertation-one-letter-at-a-time/52997
“Every ten minutes, Disembargo releases a single character—a letter, number, or space—from my final dissertation manuscript…. At the current rate of access (six characters per hour, or roughly twenty-five words a day), the entire dissertation will be available
in the fall of 2019.”
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 10
AHA and Dissertation AHA and Dissertation Embargo:Embargo:
What does each “side” value?What does each “side” value?caveat emptor: this is reductivecaveat emptor: this is reductiveAHA/Discipline-specific thinking:
Values protecting pathways in the profession from even more external pressures. Values the transfer of
traditional habits, workflows, and systems of evaluation from one generation to the next. Values
much longer periods of time, consideration, and iteration before a final expression of research is
released into the world through the imprimatur of an authoritative channel and time/resource intensive
process. Values the writing and evaluation of scholarship/content over and above its distribution, storage, preservation, and access as an “item” in a larger collection or system. Responsive to market pressures within the academic job market and the
tenuring process. 04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 11
AHA and Dissertation AHA and Dissertation Embargo:Embargo:
What does each “side” value?What does each “side” value?caveat emptor: this is reductivecaveat emptor: this is reductiveLibrary-specific thinking:
Values the distribution, storage, preservation, and access to large collections or systems of information over and above the processes through which any one item came into existence. Encounters “content” as a finished product, not necessarily. Looks at costs of
entire ecosystem more frequently than costs/investments of individual actors within it. Is
less concerned with the maintenance and transmission of disciplinary forms of evaluation and
tradition. Responsive to market forces in state/private library budgeting, escalating costs of private
information resources contracts, and potential impacts on everyday users/patrons.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 12
AHA and Dissertation AHA and Dissertation Embargo:Embargo:
What does each “side” value?What does each “side” value?caveat emptor: this is reductivecaveat emptor: this is reductiveAlso At Issue:
Are researchers more than “content providers?”
Are librarians more than “service workers?”
Yes and yes. But each side can be defensive and retreat to comfortable commonplaces in
moments of conflict and crisis. 04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 13
AHA and Dissertation AHA and Dissertation Embargo:Embargo:
What does each “side” value?What does each “side” value?For More (and less polarized approach), see
AHA 2015 Panel Storify: https://storify.com/michaelhattem/aha-panel-
123-choosing-to-embargo-what-to-do-withScholarly Kitchen conversations on embargo:http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/tag/embar
goes/
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 14
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Why don’t you just get yourself a version of arXiv.org?
Why don’t your grants just start requiring OA publication?
And so on.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 15
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Why don’t you just get yourself a version of arXiv.org?
Here’s where digital humanities comes back in. Many people are working on just this.
New digital publication forms with different structures of peer review like DHDebates.
http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debatesOr ADA: Journal of Gender, New Media and
Technology.http://adanewmedia.org/beta-reader-and-review-
policy/
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 16
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Why don’t you just get yourself a version of arXiv.org?
Here’s where digital humanities comes back in.
Many people are working on just this.
New(er) field / disciplinary emergence attempting to recalibrate disciplinary
communication and evaluation practices and traditions from within.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 17
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Why don’t your grants just start requiring OA publication?
Misunderstands the scale of funding for humanities research.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 18
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Why don’t your grants just start requiring OA publication?
National Endowment for the Humanities 2014 Budget: $146
million.National Science Foundation 2015
Budget: 7.26 billion.(Not to mention NIH and DoD)
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 19
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Why don’t your grants just start requiring OA publication?
Common form of grant/fellowship:Short-term research fellowship at a major archive of primary source
documents:
$1850 to cover travel and lodging for a month of research in residence.(American Antiquarian Society Short-term Fellowships: http://www.americanantiquarian.org/acafellowship.htm
Prestigious long-term fellowships replace a portion of your salary for a semester or academic year.
They do not have built-in provisions to subvent publication in traditional or open access publication.
They also tend not to pay overhead costs to your institution.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 20
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
There are OA options however. Some traditional journals have gone OA or
have provisions in contracts to permit submissions to institutional
repositories.
These are good steps, and there needs to be great education of and
commitment by faculty to understand issues of copyright and contract and
to know about their institutional repository.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 21
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
There are OA options however.
And some for-profit publishers are making pre-paid OA avenues open, but again, cost is
an issue.
Palgrave OA costs: Monographs: $17,500
NEH Semester-long postdoc fellowship(salary replacement in lieu of teaching):
$25,000
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 22
Why is this so difficult for the Why is this so difficult for the humanities?humanities?
Could Universities subvent these costs to support faculty OA publications?
Yes. And many do: http://www.sparc.arl.org/resource/oa-fund-five-year-review
But in a budget climate of dwindling higher education resources, especially for the humanities, these programs
can get deprioritized.
It happened at UW-Madison:https://www.library.wisc.edu/about/scholarly-
communication/open-access-publishing-support-fund/
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 23
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 24
Other Disciplinary Other Disciplinary Differences Worth NotingDifferences Worth Noting
Part of the Open Access movement’s politics is fighting the high costs of access to digital databases licensed at exorbitant rates by for-profit publishers.
For example, University of California Librarians boycotting Nature. http://phys.org/news195486711.html
But, in my estimation, most U.S.-based humanities scholarship (monographs as well as journals) is published by not-for-profit university presses who don’t reap
the profits that the Palgraves and Wileys do, but who also don’t charge the same prices.
Institutional Subscription (print and online) to J19: Journal of 19th-Century Americanists (Penn UP): $85
Institutional License for UC Berkeley to Nature group publications: more than $1 million.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 25
Other Disciplinary Other Disciplinary Differences Worth NotingDifferences Worth Noting
Given these differences (for profit, not for profit / grant and subvention differences) many argue that we need to find ways to sustain rather than disrupt the traditional
not for profit university press system. Given all of the high quality low cost
intellectual labor sustained through these processes, we need to support them
(financially) in ways that make sense with digital affordances, rather than make
everything free/open.04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 26
Other Disciplinary Other Disciplinary Differences Worth NotingDifferences Worth Noting
See recent very important discussion with William and Mary Quarterly editor Karin Wulf in The Scholarly
Kitchen:http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/03/25/guest-post-karin-
wulf-on-open-access-and-historical-scholarship/
“There needs to be more and regular attention to the importance of heterogeneous models of access, dissemination, and
production. Scholarship is developed in very different ways, within very distinctive research and publication ecosystems. No
one would suggest that biologists and film scholars organize, finance, and undertake their research along similar lines. And we know very well that the resulting scholarship is not consumed in the same way. Why, then, should we assume that the results of
that research–published scholarship—can be produced and disseminated in the same way? Especially when analyses now suggest that this is an unlikely—perhaps even undesirable—
outcome.”
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 27
OA and the Humanities:OA and the Humanities:UpsidesUpsides
At UW-Madison, Tim Elfenbein recently worked to make the Cultural Anthropology
an open access journal with a diverse range of content.
http://www.culanth.org/http://www.culanth.org/articles/
open_access
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 28
OA and the Humanities:OA and the Humanities:UpsidesUpsides
When done right, and in a way that is respectful of responsive to, the disciplines that create and knowledge and “content,”
OA can live up to its promises in the humanities and help broader publics (here
come the public humanities back in) access research and appreciate the value
of humanities thinking, research, and teaching.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 29
OA and the Humanities:OA and the Humanities:UpsidesUpsides
For example, Elfenbein recently documented how OA and smart article
titling lead to dramatic spikes in readership when difficult to understand
issues emerged in global politics, but Cultural Anthropology’s authors had
answers.https://twitter.com/timelfen/status/
590164774693941248
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 30
OA and the Humanities:OA and the Humanities:UpsidesUpsides
"'Xenophobia' in South Africa: Order, Chaos, and the Moral Economy of
Witchcraft.” was viewed 5000+ times in the past week as readers looked for ways
of putting current events in context.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 31
OA and the Humanities:OA and the Humanities:UpsidesUpsides
"'Xenophobia' in South Africa: Order, Chaos, and the Moral Economy of
Witchcraft.” was viewed 5000+ times in the past week as readers looked for ways
of putting current events in context.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 32
OA and the Humanities:OA and the Humanities:Takeaways.Takeaways.
04/21/23 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 33
Not all scholarly communication is the same. Socially, politically, economically.
Disciplines and habits are both enabling and disabling.
Faculty/researchers and librarians would do well to understand what is enabling and disabling about the habits and patterns of each party’s approach to these questions, rather than either thinking they have a monopoly on the best solution.
It’s not just fuddy duddy professors on one side and nonthinking technocrats on the other!
Faculty/researchers and librarians alike need to respect what makes each of their disciplinary habits work, especially when they don’t share overlapping values on an issue, and they need to work together to figure out which set of priorities is valued more highly when there are conflicts.
Questions?