+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Open Government

Open Government

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tieve
View: 75 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Open Government. David Curren – NIH Richard Fenger – University of Washington. Recap from Last Meeting – Jan 2014. Legislative Update DATA Act GRANT Act GONE Act Transparency Impact on Select Issues Dual Use Research Animal Welfare Intellectual Property. Today’s Goals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
24
Open Government David Curren – NIH Richard Fenger – University of Washington
Transcript
Page 1: Open Government

Open Government

David Curren – NIHRichard Fenger – University of Washington

Page 2: Open Government

Recap from Last Meeting – Jan 2014

•Legislative Update• DATA Act• GRANT Act• GONE Act

•Transparency Impact on Select Issues• Dual Use Research• Animal Welfare• Intellectual Property

Page 3: Open Government

Today’s Goals

•Recap from last meeting•Legislative Update

• DATA Act•Transparency Impact on Select Issues

• FSRS – An effort discussion

Page 4: Open Government

DATA Act

•Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014

•Bill S.994 passed both houses of Congress 4/28/14. Awaiting Presidential signature.

•Amends existing FFATA legislation•Assigns much of implementation to OMB

and Treasury•Transfers RATBoard assets to Treasury

and allows central data analysis center

Page 5: Open Government

DATA Act – Agency Reports

•Requires Agency reports to USASpending.gov:▫ data for each appropriations account: amount

appropriated, amount obligated, and "other budgetary sources"

▫ amount of funds obligated/outlayed for each program activity

▫ amount of funds obligated/outlayed for each object class

▫ amount obligated (by object class) for each program activity

• Reports preferred monthly but required quarterly

• Reports due to begin 3 years after enactment

Page 6: Open Government

DATA Act – Definitions

•Program Activity: A specific activity or project as listed in the program and financing schedules of the annual budget of the United States Government.

•Object Class: The category assigned for purposes of the annual budget of the President submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 USC, to the type of property or services purchased by the Federal Government.

Page 7: Open Government

DATA Act – Reporting Elements

•OMB/Treasury have one year to define common data elements for financial and payment information:▫ Must include unique Federal identifier for awards▫ Does not specify reporting frequency, level of

reporting (one tier of subawards, two tiers, etc).▫ OMB/Treasury must work with public and private

stakeholders in developing standards• Agencies have two years after common data elements

guidance is finalized to implement

Page 8: Open Government

DATA Act – Burden Reduction

•Two-year pilot program to evaluate reporting▫Make recommendations to Standardize reporting elements, Eliminate financial reporting duplication, Reduce compliance costs Automate financial reporting to increase

efficiency and reduce recipient costs.▫Include between $1 -$2 billion in Federal

awards▫Pilot must include data from a 12-month

reporting cycle

Page 9: Open Government

DATA Act: FDP Role

•Development of Common Data Elements▫Subaward reporting? How many tiers? Best way to handle reporting by

subawardees?▫Taking advantage of STAR Metrics?▫Problem metrics – Must include real

examples of the burden

Page 10: Open Government

DATA Act: FDP Role

•Pilot Participation▫Which is simpler, piloting a few small

institutions with many awards, or only a few awards but at many institutions?

▫Discuss results of GRIP pilot

Page 11: Open Government

DATA Act: FDP Role

•Reducing Burden of Financial and Payment Reporting▫Use electronic systems – FDP eRA

Subcommittee▫Eliminate duplicative reporting?▫Combining transparency and financial

reporting?▫Reducing audit/compliance burden?

Page 12: Open Government

Burden: From A Data Perspective

•Richard Fenger: ▫Assistant Director - Decision Support

Services in the Office of Research at the University of Washington

•Identify data within the FSRS reporting process

•Understand the effort required to report•Determine data requirements and related

effort as it relates to audit standards

Page 13: Open Government

Goal: Demonstrate general effort of sub reporting via FSRS

•Inherently the activity of sub reporting is more than just FSRS via FFATA regs. Other regulations like A133 apply

•Systems: eSRS and FSRS•Process: Proposals to Awards, Reporting

& Maintaining, Reconciliation, and Closing

•Data transverses several systems beyond FSRS

Page 14: Open Government

Landscape: eSRS and FSRS•eSRS

(Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System)

This system is designed for prime contractors to report accomplishments toward subcontracting goals required by their contract.

FSRS (FFATA Sub-award Reporting System) – This system is designed to collect subcontract and sub-grant award information in compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA).

Page 15: Open Government

Landscape: Process – Big Picture

Page 16: Open Government

Landscape: Process – Local Picture

FSRS ReportingSub Contract Management(driven by A133)

Proposal

Grant Awarded

Agreement Fully Executed

Assessing Risk

Monitoring Process

Close out

FSRS Reporting1) New Grant fully executed – x1

FSRS MonitoringRECONCILEFTE = TBD

Prep work = heavy Checklists(sub prep) A133 identification Scope of Work, PI Justification Sub Justification

Subaward Team Work Human intervention/

Assessments Templates and Checklists

Update & Review

FSRS Reporting2) Modifications to sub – every modification3) Annually – x Active Subs

10 elements 30 mins per

report Entry & Review

Complexity Factors Tiers Foreign/Domestic Profit/Non Profit

1

2

3

4

Page 17: Open Government

Process Simplified for PresentationPreface: 700 or so…1. Proposal & Award – (A133)

• Defined process• Foreign or Domestic?• Profit or Non-profit?• Checklists• Subrecipient monitoring and vetting

Capability and reliability of subrecipient Risk Assessment

2. FSRS Report Entry/Review & Maintenance 170 or so…• Pre-populated data and elements

• 30 mins per new report• 15 min per maintenance activity (many per year)

1

2

Page 18: Open Government

Process Simplified for Presentation3. RECONCILIATION

• Internal data to external data• Awards to expenditures• Common ID: Difficulties relating across

systems• Errors: Manual Entry• Internal tracking my not match agency• Tiers?

4. Close-out

3

4

Page 19: Open Government

Reconciliation Process: Generally

Internal Award System Detailed data on awards and subawards, can

search previous years via UW budget number. Award values match Federal Award reporting platforms.

No match for DHHS sponsor award number

Federal Reporting SourcesNIH RePORT Not searchable via UW DUNS, only by searching

a portion of the award number.

USAspending.gov 13 Award Transactions ( =͛10- =͛12), no subaward data

Expenditure Data Detailed data on direct and indirect

expenditures. Does not match SEFA expenditure data. Same Award number as SAGE/SPAERC, so also

different DHHS Sponsor Award Number

State Audit Report (A133) SEFA Out of 20 unique sponsor award only able to

locate four in other systems and the data did not match entirely. Small differences in the subcontract identifiers and amounts for subrecipients

HHSN275200800015C / 11

275200800015C-11-0-1

HHSN275200800015C, Mod. 11

HHSN275200800015C, Mod. 11

Sponsor Award # ExternalInternal

Awards

Expenditures

HHSN275200800015CMOD11

HHSN275200800015

FSRS

Page 20: Open Government

Reconciliation Process: Detailed

NIH

Unique Award Prime Sponsor Number Award Sponsor Number

HHSN275200800015CHHSN275200800015C,Mod. 2HHSN275200800015C, Mod 6

HHSN272008000015C, Mod. 9 HHSN275200800015C, Mod 10

HHSN275200800015C, Mod. 11

University of Washington

U$ 689,576U$ 265,752U$ 3,975,000U$ 1,400,000U$ 1,069,234U$ 3,070,707

# 61-7858

U$13,439,515

Award Amount (FA)

200720092009201020112011

9/30/200810/07/200909/22/2010 9/23/201110/3/20119/25/2013

Budget Biennium Date Award received

HHSN275200800015 FA32448FA44937FA62221FA74225FA74484FA85540

UW Funding Action (FA)

Budget #

U$56,243.35 U$31,4391.23 87,725.58

Dir. Expenditure Indirect Expendit Total expenditureFY Year

2009

U$341,691.17 U$113,270.90 U$265,752.002010

U$2,675,755.31 U$640,635.79 U$3,266,391.002011

U$2,169,399 U$365,539.15 U$2,534,983.332012

U$792,640.81 U$257,983.64 U$1,050,624,452013

One multi year grant with subcontracts -> Seven Funding Actions - > 1 Budget

NIH Reporting USA Spending Calendar Year Schedule Expenditure of Federal Awards FY 2013 – WA StateAward/Contract Control Number: HHSN275200800015CMOD11 Total Expenditure: U$ 2,174,385Exp. Amount through subrecipients: U$ 472,775

From 20 Sponsor Award number, this was one of the four matches found in the three reporting systems. Small difference in the subcontract identifier and amount for subrecipients.

PIID/MOD: HHSN275200800015C / 11 Obligation amount: U$ 3,070,707Signed Data: 09/21/2012

It shows 13 Transactions from 2010 to 2012 (Complete history of the prime award number)No reports about subcontractors was found in USA Spending regarding this grant

Project Number: 275200800015C-11-0-1 Application: 8151578 Project Start Date: 09/26/2008Project End Date:09/25/2013Total Funding: 3,070,707

This grant does not pop up in the report downloaded from NIH using UW DUNS number (605799469). It pops up using the NIH search tool directly from the website.

Reporting phase / Reconciliation (without unique identifier)

Washington State University

Regents of the University of California, Los Angeles

SC4861

SC6901

10/16/12

02/11/13

$301,857

$279,942

UW Sub # Subcontractor Date reporting

SA amount

Expenditures amount / Fiscal year / No unique identifier

SEFA Includesi) SEFA (Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards) Total awards amount from Fed agenciesii) Note F (Supplemental info) UW is subrecipient of other institutions except of the WA Stateiii) Note G (Supplemental info) UW is subrecipient of the State

Grants & Contracts /Calendar Year / Prime number Award (NIH)General info

Grants & Contracts /Calendar Year / Prime number Award (NIH).Association with PI background and similar projects

ExpensesContract – Grant between NSF and University of Washington (Application)

Multi year grant

Page 21: Open Government

General Findings• Unique Identifier: among the three entities, even though

NIH prime project number (six digits) is recognized in some level by the three reporting systems, each source uses an adaption of it. Finding matches required the inclusion of other fields like PI name or award amount

• Across Systems: finding matches required the inclusion of other fields like PI name, award amount, or project name

• Four of 20 grants: were found in SEFA, NIH and USA Spending reports using Sponsor contract identifier and using amount award for FY 2013. Between SEFA and internal systems, sub recipient matches were hard to come by

• Effort: 1 FTE took 40 hours to match info. Process mostly manual

Page 22: Open Government

Questions? Thoughts?

Page 23: Open Government

Contact InfoFirst Name: Richard Last Name: Fenger

Organization: University of Washington

Title: Assistant Director - Decision Support Services

Department: Office of Research Information Services (ORIS)

Address: 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE

O2

City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98195

Phone: (206) 221-6729 ext:  Fax: ()

Email: [email protected]

Page 24: Open Government

Contact Info (continued

•David Curren▫Special Assistant to the OPERA Director▫[email protected]


Recommended