Date post: | 20-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Operating Room SafetyFires
Grand Rounds PresentationJune 18, 2009
John Chi, MD
Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery at PENN Excellence in Patient Care, Education and Research since 1870
UCLA Medical Center, 1990
UCLA Medical Center, 1990
• 26 year-old female struck by auto
• Blunt injuries to abdomen, chest
• Endotracheal intubation
• Emergency surgery
OR Fire
• Surgery completed
OR Fire
• Surgery completed
• Drapes ignited by cautery device
OR Fire
• Surgery completed
• Drapes ignited by cautery device
• Flames spread rapidly and engulf patient
OR Fire
• Surgery completed
• Drapes ignited by cautery device
• Flames spread rapidly and engulf patient
• Smoke forces OR staff to evacuate
OR Fire
• Surgery completed
• Drapes ignited by cautery device
• Flames spread rapidly and engulf patient
• Smoke forces OR staff to evacuate
• OR sprinkler system does not activate
OR Fire
• Surgery completed
• Drapes ignited by cautery device
• Flames spread rapidly and engulf patient
• Smoke forces OR staff to evacuate
• OR sprinkler system does not activate
• Fire Department arrives and controls fire
Outcome
• Patient expires in the fire
• Operating room staff treated for minor burns and smoke inhalation
Safety
“If you don't know what is going to happen, there is no way to stop it.”
OR Fires
• Introduction
• Causes
• Outcomes
• Prevention
Epidemiology
>30,000,000 surgeries per year
>2,000 reported hospital fires
30 reported OR fires
Source: American College of Surgeons,1997.
Locations of Fires
18
15
9
7
2
0 5 10 15 20
Equipment
Head & Neck
Airway
Torso
Perineum
Number of Fires
Source: Tyco Healthcare Valleylab 2006.
Locations of Fires
~ 65% of fires occur in the Head & Neck region because of the O2 rich environment
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992.
OR Fires
• Introduction
• Causes
• Outcomes
• Prevention
Requirements for Fire
Oxidizer + Fuel + Ignition = FIRE
Oxidizers
Oxidizers
• Oxygen
Oxidizers
• Oxygen– Oxygen is denser than air
1.308 g/L O2 > 1.251 g/L N2
Oxidizers
• Oxygen– Oxygen is denser than air
1.308 g/L O2 > 1.251 g/L N2
– Collects in low-lying areas
Oxidizers
• Oxygen– Oxygen is denser than air
1.308 g/L O2 > 1.251 g/L N2
– Collects in low-lying areas– Absorbed and retained by fabrics
Oxidizers
• Oxygen– Oxygen is denser than air
1.308 g/L O2 > 1.251 g/L N2
– Collects in low-lying areas– Absorbed and retained by fabrics
• Nitrous oxide
Oxidizers
• Oxygen– Oxygen is denser than air
1.308 g/L O2 > 1.251 g/L N2
– Collects in low-lying areas– Absorbed and retained by fabrics
• Nitrous oxide– Releases oxygen when heat is applied
OR Fuels
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992;21:3-39.
OR Fuels
• Patient
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992;21:3-39.
OR Fuels
• Patient
• Prepping agents
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992;21:3-39.
OR Fuels
• Patient
• Prepping agents
• Ointments
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992;21:3-39.
OR Fuels
• Patient
• Prepping agents
• Ointments
• Linens
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992;21:3-39.
OR Fuels
• Patient
• Prepping agents
• Ointments
• Linens
• Equipment
Source: ECRI. Devastation of patient fires. Health devices. 1992;21:3-39.
OR Fuels - Patient
• Hair• Surgical cap• Gown• GI tract gases
OR Fuels – Prepping Agents
• Alcohol• Chlorhexidine• Acetone• Betadine
Betadine??
Betadine??
• Explodes in the presence of high oxygen or nitrous oxide concentrations at high temperatures
Source: Briscoe et al, 1976.
Betadine??
• Explodes in the presence of high oxygen or nitrous oxide concentrations at high temperatures
Source: Briscoe et al, 1976.
Betadine
Betadine
Flammability of the Product: May be combustible at high temperature.
Glycerin
Glycerin
Flammability of the Product: May be combustible at high temperature.
OR Fuels - Ointments
• Petrolatum• Benzoin• Paraffin• Aerosols
OR Fuels - Linens
• Drapes• Dressings, sponges• Surgical gowns,
masks, caps• Mattresses• Sheets, blankets• Egg crates
OR Fuels - Equipment
• Flexible endoscopes
• ECG wires
• Blood pressure cuff
• Tubing
• Gloves
• Anesthesia machine
Flammability Standards
• OR equipment
• OR supplies
• OR gowns, masks, caps
• Anesthetics
Source: Sommers JR. Flammability standards. SSM 1998;2:41-4.
Requirements for Fire
Oxidizer + Fuel + Ignition = FIRE
OR Fire Survey
Source: Smith LP, Roy S. Accepted at AAO-HNS Annual Meeting, Sept 2009.
OR Fire Survey
8,523 questionnaires
Source: Smith LP, Roy S. Accepted at AAO-HNS Annual Meeting, Sept 2009.
OR Fire Survey
8,523 questionnaires
349 respondents
Source: Smith LP, Roy S. Accepted at AAO-HNS Annual Meeting, Sept 2009.
OR Fire Survey
8,523 questionnaires
349 respondents
88 respondents > 1 Fire
Source: Smith LP, Roy S. Accepted at AAO-HNS Annual Meeting, Sept 2009.
OR Fire Survey
8,523 questionnaires
349 respondents
88 respondents > 1 Fire
10 respondents = 2 Fires
Source: Smith LP, Roy S. Accepted at AAO-HNS Annual Meeting, Sept 2009.
OR Fire Survey
8,523 questionnaires
349 respondents
88 respondents > 1 Fire
10 respondents = 2 Fires
2 respondents = 5 Fires
Source: Smith LP, Roy S. Accepted at AAO-HNS Annual Meeting, Sept 2009.
Fire Scenarios
27% Endoscopic Airway Surgery
24% Oropharyngeal Electrocautery Surgery
23% Electrocautery Surgery under MAC
18% Tracheotomy
7% Endoscopic Light Cables
1% Anesthesia Machine
Endoscopic Airway Surgery
Endoscopic Airway Surgery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen– Nitrous Oxide
Endoscopic Airway Surgery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen– Nitrous Oxide
FUEL: – ET Tube, LASER ET Tube– Flexible Bronchoscope, Drapes
Endoscopic Airway Surgery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen– Nitrous Oxide
FUEL: – ET Tube, LASER ET Tube– Flexible Bronchoscope, Drapes
IGNITION: – LASER - CO2 more often than KTP
Laser Ignition of Drapes
Source: Wolf et al, 2004.
Laser Ignition of Drapes
• Surgical drapes tested for time to ignition
Source: Wolf et al, 2004.
Laser Ignition of Drapes
• Surgical drapes tested for time to ignition
• CO2 laser 15 W, 2 mm spot x 30 sec
Source: Wolf et al, 2004.
Laser Ignition of Drapes
• Surgical drapes tested for time to ignition
• CO2 laser 15 W, 2 mm spot x 30 sec
21% O2 50% O2 95% O2
Source: Wolf et al, 2004.
Laser Ignition of Drapes
• Surgical drapes tested for time to ignition
• CO2 laser 15 W, 2 mm spot x 30 sec
21% O2 50% O2 95% O2
Primary ignition – drapes
Secondary ignition – drapes on filter paper
Source: Wolf et al, 2004.
Drapes Tested
• Nonwoven cellulose/polyester blend
• Polypropylene
• Reusable woven cotton/polyester blend
• Huck cotton towel drape adjunct
• Phenol polymer
Time to Primary Ignition 21%
Material Ignited / Tested TTI
Phenol polymer 0 / 10 N/A
Polypropylene 0 / 10 N/A
Huck towel 8 / 10 11.9 sec
Cotton-poly 10 / 10 4.0 sec
Cellulose-poly 10 / 10 2.7 sec
Time to Primary Ignition 50%
Material Ignited / Tested TTI
Phenol polymer 10 / 10 4.9 s
Polypropylene 9 / 10 0.14 s
Huck towel 10 / 10 2.3 s
Cotton-poly 10 / 10 1.1 s
Cellulose-poly 10 / 10 < 0.1 s
Time to Primary Ignition 95%
Material Ignited / Tested TTI
Phenol polymer 10 / 10 0.68 s
Polypropylene 10 / 10 0.18 s
Huck towel 10 / 10 < 0.1 s
Cotton-poly 10 / 10 0.65 s
Cellulose-poly 10 / 10 < 0.1 s
Time to Secondary Ignition 21%
Material Ignited / Tested TTI
Polypropylene & Filter Paper
10 / 10 4.7 s
Filter Paper alone
10 / 10 5.2 s
Filter paper was placed beneath the test material.
Laser Study Conclusions
• Time to ignition decreases with increasing O2 concentration
• Polypropylene assumes the ignition characteristics of materials it contacts
Oropharyngeal Electrocautery
Oropharyngeal Electrocautery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
Oropharyngeal Electrocautery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – ET Tube – Bovie Tip– Tonsil Sponge – Red Rubber Catheter
Oropharyngeal Electrocautery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – ET Tube – Bovie Tip– Tonsil Sponge – Red Rubber Catheter
IGNITION: – Monopolar Electrocautery
Fire risk: Monopolar v. Coblator
Source: Smith LP, Roy S, Laryngoscope, Accepted for publication.
Fire risk: Monopolar v. Coblator
• Monopolar – Coagulate: 15 W
• Coblator – Ablate: 9, 7, 3 – Coagulate: 5, 3
Source: Smith LP, Roy S, Laryngoscope, Accepted for publication.
Fire risk: Monopolar v. Coblator
• Degutted raw chicken
• 6.0 ET Tube
• 100% oxygen at 10 L/min
• 3 tonsil sponges
Source: Smith LP, Roy S, Laryngoscope, Accepted for publication.
OP Fire Study Setup
Monopolar Electrocautery
After 45–55 secs of Monopolar
After 45–55 secs of Monopolar
After the fire
Coblator Electrocautery
After 4 minutes of Coblator
After 4 minutes of Coblator
After 20 minutes of Coblator
After 20 minutes of Coblator
Back to Monopolar for 25 secs
Back to Monopolar for 25 secs
OP Fire Study Conclusions
• Monopolar Electrocautery (>15 W) poses a fire risk
• Coblator Electrocautery did not produce fires
Electrocautery Surgery (MAC)
Electrocautery Surgery (MAC)
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
Electrocautery Surgery (MAC)
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – Flash Fire – Drapes– EtOH Prep – Sponges
Electrocautery Surgery (MAC)
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – Flash Fire – Drapes– EtOH Prep – Sponges
IGNITION: – Monopolar Electrocautery – LASER– Thermocautery– Oxidizer to ignition source <5cm
Arizona Medical Center,1998
Arizona Medical Center,1998
• 73 year-old male with SDH for bilateral burr holes
• Oxygen via face mask at 6 L/min
• Iodofor surgical prep – (0.7% iodine, 74% Isopropyl EtOH)
• Drapes: Towels, Paper surgical drapes
• Monopolar Electrocautery
OR Fire
OR Fire
• “Pop”
OR Fire
• “Pop”
• Smoke appears from beneath the drapes
OR Fire
• “Pop”
• Smoke appears from beneath the drapes
• Drapes quickly removed
OR Fire
• “Pop”
• Smoke appears from beneath the drapes
• Drapes quickly removed
• “Ball of flame” engulfs the patient’s head
OR Fire
• “Pop”
• Smoke appears from beneath the drapes
• Drapes quickly removed
• “Ball of flame” engulfs the patient’s head
• Oxygen mask on fire
OR Fire
• “Pop”
• Smoke appears from beneath the drapes
• Drapes quickly removed
• “Ball of flame” engulfs the patient’s head
• Oxygen mask on fire
• Fire smothered with drapes
OR Fire
• “Pop”
• Smoke appears from beneath the drapes
• Drapes quickly removed
• “Ball of flame” engulfs the patient’s head
• Oxygen mask on fire
• Fire smothered with drapes
• Oxygen flow turned off
Outcome
• Intubation
• 2nd degree burns of face, neck
• ICU x 2 months
• Pneumonia, Respiratory Failure
• Inpatient rehabilitation
Simulated OR Fire
Simulated OR Fire
• Life size manikin
• Oxygen supplied via face mask
• Positioned, prepped, and draped
• Monopolar electrocautery
Simulation Setup
Monopolar Electrocautery- POP
Smoke – POP + 5 seconds
Fire – POP + 13 seconds
Fire – POP + 24 seconds
Beneath the drapes
Beneath the drapes
Beneath the drapes
Beneath the drapes
Simulation Fire Requirements
Source: Barker SJ, Polson SJ, 2001.
Simulation Fire Requirements
• Supplemental oxygen
Source: Barker SJ, Polson SJ, 2001.
Simulation Fire Requirements
• Supplemental oxygen
• Closed space formed by drapes (Tenting)
Source: Barker SJ, Polson SJ, 2001.
Simulation Fire Requirements
• Supplemental oxygen
• Closed space formed by drapes (Tenting)
• Alcohol-based preparation solution– Manufacturer’s label drying time 2-3 minutes– Drying time > 5 minutes No fire
Source: Barker SJ, Polson SJ, 2001.
Oxygen Face Masks
Oxygen Face Masks
• Melt when exposed to open flame
Oxygen Face Masks
• Melt when exposed to open flame
• Do NOT burn without oxygen flow
Oxygen Face Masks
• Melt when exposed to open flame
• Do NOT burn without oxygen flow
• Ignite, burn with oxygen flow > 3 L/min
Tracheotomy
Tracheotomy
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
Tracheotomy
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – Flash Fire, ET Tube, Drape, Airway
Tracheotomy
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – Flash Fire, ET Tube, Drape, Airway
IGNITION: – Monopolar electrocautery
• Electrocautery to enter trachea• Electrocautery after airway incision
Endoscopic Surgery
Endoscopic Surgery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
Endoscopic Surgery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – Drapes
• Cellulose-based: IGNITE• Polypropylene-based: MELT
Endoscopic Surgery
OXIDIZER: – Oxygen
FUEL: – Drapes
• Cellulose-based: IGNITE• Polypropylene-based: MELT
IGNITION: – Endoscopic Light Cable– Temperature > 200º Celcius
OR Fires
• Introduction
• Causes
• Outcomes
• Prevention
Outcomes
Analysis of Closed Claims
Source: Bhananker et al, 2006.
Analysis of Closed Claims
Analysis of the closed claims of 35 US professional liability insurance companies
Source: Bhananker et al, 2006.
Analysis of Closed Claims
Analysis of the closed claims of 35 US professional liability insurance companies
• 121 MAC-related claims reviewed
• 20 OR fires leading to burns
Source: Bhananker et al, 2006.
OR Fires
• 95% involved head, neck, face
OR Fires
• 95% involved head, neck, face
• 50% cited for substandard care
OR Fires
• 95% involved head, neck, face
• 50% cited for substandard care
• 89% resulted in payment to plaintiff– Median $71,375– Range $8,175 to $321,323
OR Fires
• Introduction
• Causes
• Outcomes
• Prevention
Prevention
Prevention
• Communication with OR Staff, Anesthesia
Prevention
• Communication with OR Staff, Anesthesia
• Assess the OR fire risk
Prevention
• Communication with OR Staff, Anesthesia
• Assess the OR fire risk
• Electrocautery – avoid Fuels + Oxidizers
Prevention
• Communication with OR Staff, Anesthesia
• Assess the OR fire risk
• Electrocautery – avoid Fuels + Oxidizers
• Minimize available O2
Prevention
• Communication with OR Staff, Anesthesia
• Assess the OR fire risk
• Electrocautery – avoid Fuels + Oxidizers
• Minimize available O2
• Prep Solutions – proceed with caution
Prevention
• Communication with OR Staff, Anesthesia
• Assess the OR fire risk
• Electrocautery – avoid Fuels + Oxidizers
• Minimize available O2
• Prep Solutions – proceed with caution
• Fire Safety Training
Summary
Summary
• OR fires are preventable
Summary
• OR fires are preventable
• Be aware of your surroundings
Summary
• OR fires are preventable
• Be aware of your surroundings
Oxidizer + Fuel + Ignition = FIRE
Thank You
• Lee Smith, MD
• James Kearney, MD
Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery at PENN Excellence in Patient Care, Education and Research since 1870