Date post: | 04-Sep-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nguyenkhanh |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Operational
Effectiveness at UCSB
OE Mid-Year Review Session & Luncheon
Thursday, January 17th, 2013
What is the Role of OE Currently?
OE Moving Forward…
Provides campus with a formal structure that ties
into system-wide ‘Working Smarter’ initiative
Provides monitoring, oversight, and support for
OE projects initiated over last two years
Provides support and coordination for campus
system projects now managed by A.S. PMO
Provides campus leadership with a forum to
evaluate future topics for OE activity
OE Mid-Year Review Session
Our Purpose Today…
Provide OE leaders, co-chairs, and project leads with an opportunity to take stock of progress, identify issues or challenges, and discuss upcoming milestones
Provide OE Leadership with an opportunity to share comments, input and suggestions on the OE-initiated project plans and activity to-date
Review and discuss the roadmap of upcoming implementation steps associated with OE-initiated projects, and strategize on additional steps that would support effective implementation, as well as campus-wide awareness and readiness for anticipated changes.
INITIATIVES Focus Areas
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Streamline IT governance; Adopt one email/calendaring collaboration suite; Outsource student email
SHOPS & FACILITIES Consolidate machine & maintenance shops; Consolidate procurement; Service benchmarking & optimization
TICKETING & EVENTS Consolidate ticketing platforms; Centralize scheduling & calendaring activity
CAMPUS SYSTEMS Campus personnel
Support A.S. PMO in implementation of UCPath and Kronos
CAMPUS SYSTEMS Procurement
Support A.S. PMO in implementation of ‘Gateway’ procurement system & strategic sourcing
CAMPUS SYSTEMS Financial System
Support A.S. PMO in implementation of new Financial System
CAMPUS SYSTEMS E-ESCI and Recruit System
Support Instructional Development and Academic Personnel in implementation of E-ESCI and Recruit System
OE Supported Initiatives
FY 2010 – 11 | FY 2011 – 12 | FY 2012 – 13 |
OE Year 1, 2 and 3 Timeline Overview In
form
ati
on
Tec
hn
olo
gy
Sh
op
Serv
ices
T
ick
eti
ng
& E
ven
ts
Ca
mp
us
Syste
ms
IT OE Committee
Analysis Outsource Student Email Planning
IT Governance Design IT Governance Implementation
E-ESCI Initial Pilot E-ESCI Expanded
Pilot
E-ESCI Feasibility
Analysis & Planning E-ESCI Pilot
Continued
Office 365 Phase I Planning &
Implementation
Shop Services Committee
Analysis
Machine Shop Consolidation
Planning Machine Shop Consolidation Steps
OE Campus Facilities Planning OE Campus Facilities
Implementation Steps
Ticketing & Events Committee
Survey and Analysis
A.S. Ticketing System
Selection & Planning
AS. Event Calendar Design
A.S. Ticketing System
Implementation
A.S. Event Calendar Pilot
Campus Personnel Committee
Survey & Analysis
Kronos Project Planning
UCPath Project Planning
PMO Set-up Support
Gateway Phase I & II
A.S. PMO Office
• Gateway
• Kronos
• Financial System
• UCPath
One Email/Calendaring Suite
Proposal & Proof of Concept
Student Email
Migration
Connect [Office 365]
OE Mid-Year Review Session
Jamie Sonsini
Office of Information Systems & Technology
[8 min.]
What is Connect? Microsoft Office 365 at UCSB
Services in the Microsoft “cloud”
Services and Support at UCSB
Phase 1 – H1 2013
Phase 2 – To Be Discussed
IT Planning Group
Calendar Work
Group
October 2010
The Road to Here
Report to IT Board
October 2011
Proof of Concept
Group
January 2012
Report to IT Board
July 2012
Connect Phase 1 Connect Users
All-In (Email & Calendaring)
Calendar Only (Just Calendaring)
Cross Calendar
Support
Departmental – Tier 1 Support
Central – Tier 2 Support & Tenant Administration
Campus Coordination Connect Governance Group
https://it.ucsb.edu/groups/cgg
Connect Technical Coordination Group
https://it.ucsb.edu/groups/ctcg
CONNECTTECH-L Listserver List
89 Subscribed
When Phase 1 is Complete Calendaring
Campus Calendaring/Scheduling Standard
Cross Calendaring
Consolidate OIST Email Services
Available for Others
Support
Expandable Collaborative Support Team
Future Collaborative Services
Shop Services
Marc Fisher & Willie Brown OE Campus Facilities
[10 min]
Rod Alferness Science & Engineering Shops
[5 min.]
Campus Facilities
Setting the Stage
Since 2004…
Budget reduction of $4,734,005
Space increase of ½ Million S.F.
UCI is our closest comparison in
space/size, yet have 73 Trades FTE to
our 46 Trades FTE
Campus Facilities
OE Activity To-Date
Consolidated vendor contracts
Strategic Sourcing
Shop Co-Location Opportunity with
Cabrillo Business Park
Operating Budget Proposal & Service
Enhancements Outlined
Deferred Maintenance Plan Outlined
Campus Facilities Highlighted from a recent survey of 50 MSOs
Positively…
“I think overall the services provided by facilities are amazing.”
“I would have to say that I have noticed quite an improvement in the customer service area since last year.”
Yet, 70% of respondents said they were not contacted by a tech within 10 days about the work order status
“You need more techs in the field”
“Survey seems unfair because you don’t have enough techs in the field.”
Operational Effectiveness Initiative
Maintenance Restoration
2013-17
Summary Of Operational Effectiveness Initiative - "Year One" 2013-14 2013-14
(1) Temporary funded and Unfunded Employees $139,000
(2) Restored Building Maintenance $408,592
(3) Restored Custodial Academic Space Appearance Standards. $138,104
(4) Maintenance Supervision $15,000
(5) Window Cleaning $125,000
Totals Of All Programs Year One $825,696
Operational Effectiveness Initiative
Maintenance Restoration
2013-17
Summary Of Operational Effectiveness Initiative – "Year Two" 2014-15 2014-15
(3) Restored Custodial Academic Space Appearance Standards. $222,104
(4) Maintenance Supervision $103,000
(6) Restored Building Preventive Maintenance $589,568
Total of Ongoing Maintenance Programs Year Two $914,672
One Time Cost Year Two
(7) Equipment Upgrades $360,000
Operational Effectiveness Initiative
Maintenance Restoration
2013-17
Summary Of Operational Effectiveness Initiative - "Year Three" 2015-16 2015-16
(2) Restored Maintenance $619,024
(3) Restored Academic Space Appearance Standards $138,104
(6) Restored Preventive Maintenance $265,908
(8) Grounds Field Maintenance and Tree Trimming $100,000
Totals Of All Programs Year Three $1,123,036
Operational Effectiveness Initiative
Maintenance Restoration
2013-17
Summary Of Operational Effectiveness Initiative - "Year Four" 2016-17 2016-17
(1) Temporary funded and Unfunded Employees $72,000
(2) Restored Maintenance $935,837
(3) Restored Academic Space Appearance Standards $138,104
(8) Grounds Field Maintenance and Tree Trimming $91,348
Totals Of All Programs Year Four $1,237,289
Operational Effectiveness Initiative
Maintenance Restoration
2013-17 Year One Year Two Year Three Year Four
Summary Of Campus Effectiveness Years One through Four 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
(1) Temporary funded and Unfunded Employees $139,000 $- $- $72,000
(2) Restored Building Maintenance $408,592 $- $619,024 $935,837
(3) Restored Custodial Academic Space Appearance Standards. $138,104 $222,104 $138,104 $138,104
(4) Maintenance Supervision $15,000 $103,000 $- $-
(5) Window Cleaning $125,000 $- $- $-
(6) Restored Building Preventive Maintenance $- $589,568 $265,908 $-
(7) Equipment Upgrades $- $360,000 $- $-
(8) Grounds Field Maintenance and Tree Trimming $- $- $100,000 $91,348
Totals Of All Programs $825,696 $1,274,672
$- $1,123,036
$-
$1,237,289
Operational Effectiveness Initiative
Maintenance Restoration
2013-17
OE Initiative Grand Total For Fours Years 2013-2017 $4,100,693
One Time Equipment Expenditure $360,000
Increase in Employees By Year
2013-17 Year One Year Two Year Three Year Four
Totals 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Total FTE's 35 7 8 11 9
OE SHOP UPDATES (MLPS)
Physical Sciences Building North
• Reduced machine shop space by 320 asf. Removed outdated equipment(EDM, Electroplating).
• Relocated glassblowing shop from 2nd floor to main shop area. Space reduced from 700 asf to 550 asf.
• Fully decommissioned electronics shop (790 asf).
• Carpentry shop space reduced by 230 asf.
• Move generated roughly 1,500 asf of space in PSB-North and created a large graduate student office suite and commons area.
• Employee attrition reduced staffing by one FTE.
Ticketing & Events Marisela Marquez & Freddie Mercer
Ticketing System Project Leads
Sean Lieberman Events Calendar Project Lead
[15 min]
Ticket & Events
Ticketing System Update
98 Events Completed
Increased Staffing
Expected new clients for Winter Quarter
– Theater and Dance
Ticket & Events
Events Calendar Update
Meeting with John Longbrake from
Public Affairs and Event Planners
Front-End Event Creation 70%
Complete
Ready for Beta Testers in February
ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE
ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS PROJECT STATUS UPDATE
Brian Richard
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
1. Administrative Systems PMO Overview
2. Projects
3. Financial System Update
4. How To Help
5. Questions
COMMUNICATION
PRESENTATIONS
NEWSLETTERS
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE www.pmo.ucsb.edu
Project SharePoint sites established
UCPATH: GOAL
Implement Share
Oracle/ PeopleSoft
Human Capital
Management System
Payroll & HR
Business
Processes
Riverside Service Center
Standardize across UC
A UC system-wide project to streamline and standardize payroll and human resources processes across all UC locations.
UCPATH: STATUS Biweekly Pay on January 20th Most nonexempt employees will remain on exception pay until Kronos is deployed to the whole campus.
Timeline Change Possible Wave 1 go live date on April 1, 2014.
Our Campus We are facilitating communication between Business Process Teams and Subject Matter Experts and project management with UCOP.
KRONOS: STATUS Old Timeline UCPath Biweekly transition accelerated by 9 months, disrupted rollout.
Q4 2012 Progress 3,500 employees using Kronos as of December 1.
Discoveries Timekeeping practices have diverged. Variable Multiple funding issue has not been fully researched and standardized.
KRONOS: NEXT STEPS Biweekly Pay Ensure Kronos is programmed correctly for biweekly transition.
February – June 2013 Monthly deployments of 500 – 700 employees. Major focus on Student Affairs and other non-academic staff.
Testing for multiple funding, followed by deployments for academic and research employees.
GATEWAY: GOAL
Collective Buying Power
Contracted Pricing
Manage Funding Sources
Speed
Wide
Selection
Sustainable
Automated
Implement SciQuest
Standardize purchasing processes
Leverage collective buying power
Save money
FINANCIAL SYSTEM: GOAL
Implement
Oracle/ PeopleSoft Financials
Get off the mainframe
Business process review
Major Efficiencies
Reporting
Real-time
Transparent
PHASE 1 General Ledger Chart of Accounts Purchasing Accounts Payable Budget Ledger Asset Management Projects
PHASE 1 TIMELINE (Phase 1: October 2012 – October 2013)
Discovery
Oct-Nov 2012 Kick-off Charter
Fit Gap Analysis
Configuration
Jan 2013
Configuration Documented
Basic Conversions
Extensions
Mar 2013
Workflow Development
Development Conversions
Integration Testing
Adaptions
Mar-Jun 2013
Develop Interfaces
Report Development
User Acceptance
Testing
Deployment
Jun-Sept 2013 User Training Security Deployment
Data Migration
FIT GAP SESSIONS
contrast Oracle/PeopleSoft Financials against UCSB’s current processes and requirements.
System
Fits
System
Gaps
BUSINESS PROCESS TEAMS Team Lead(s) General Ledger/Chart of Accounts Natalee Hillman, Business & Financial Services
Accounts Payable Steve Kriz, Business & Financial Services
Purchasing Jacob Godfrey, Purchasing
Project Costing/Contracts & Grants Linda Sessler, Business & Financial Services
Project Costing FAMAS Kara Kaneda, Facilities Management
Asset Management Vaughn Boyle, Purchasing
Budget (Commitment Control) Arliene Shelor, Budget Office
Accounts Receivable Linda Sessler, Business & Financial Services
FUNCTIONALITY OBSERVATIONS
Nothing arose to impede our approach of a ‘vanilla’ implementation.
(e.g. no customizations)
ORGANIZATIONAL OBSERVATIONS
Scope Some want to add additional modules during Phase 1.
Process We need to trust Ciber’s implementation methodology.
Change Departments are adjusting to many new systems and changes.
PHASE 1 DELIVERABLE
In October of 2013,
once PeopleSoft Financials is implemented,
you will not notice any changes.
However, the risk associated with the mainframe
will be mitigated.
PARTICIPATION
Business Process Team members must be fully engaged during the design phase.
Meeting attendance and preparation.
THANK YOU Participation Many campus employees take time to out of their schedules to serve on business process and implementation teams.
Communication Thanks for spreading the word, inviting the PMO to meetings, and telling us what you need. Contact Matt Erickson at x4219.
Support Institutional change can be difficult. Your ongoing support, through words and actions, helps us move forward.
Campus System Projects
E-ESCI Update
George Michaels Director, Instructional Development
E-ESCI Project Lead
[5 min]
Campus System Projects UC Recruit Update
Cindy Doherty
Director, Academic Personnel UC Recruit Project Lead
[5 min]
UC Recruit What is UC Recruit?
System-wide electronic tool for faculty recruitments
Developed and hosted by UCI
Some benefits and efficiencies
Less work for departmental staff
Consistent data collection
Higher return rate for data regarding applicant pool
Time-line for implementation
Jan. 1- March 31; Central office work
April; Campus training and roll out
May 1: Application available for departmental use
Campus System Projects UCPath Current & Future State Update
Cindy Doherty & Tricia Hiemstra UCPath Business Process Team Co-Chairs
Juli Pippin
Campus Systems Future State Co-Chair
[10 min]
UCPath: Current Activities
UCPath System-wide decisions: Standardization while still providing campus flexibility
Current activity on campus
Prior OE committee work PPS transactional work recommendations
Campus Business Process Mapping workgroup Review and analysis of current state personnel processes
Provide recommendations regarding future state
Working group for other UCPath implementation issues as needed
UCPath Current & Future State
Future State Design
Current State Analysis
Transition Planning with
Human Resources
How is our campus currently getting the work
done?
What will the workflow be in the new system?
What work will be done in the UCPath center,
and what workflow will need to interface into it?
How will other campuses organize their
services, given the new workflow and UCPath
center?
What service model options do we have and
what are the implications for our structure, and
our funding model?
Given the service center model and resulting
structure, what will be the impact on staffing?
What support for retraining or redeployment will
we provide?
How do we communicate this plan to staff?
Campus Systems: Future State Committee Scope [DRAFT]:
Serve as a departmental-side planning partner to the implementation teams and A.S. PMO, to support robust communication and coordination with academic and administrative departments to ensure implementation efforts are a success.
Provide divisional and departmental control points with recommendations on how to best optimize the staffing structure to carry out transaction-based activity, given the new business system processes, requirements, and constraints.
Serve as a conduit of information between departmental leadership, staff, and faculty, and the implementation teams.
Ensure key system-related issues, concerns and suggestions arising at the departmental-level are funneled to the appropriate implementation teams.
Lead a campus-wide visioning exercise to design one or more future state organizational scenarios that capitalize on system-enabled efficiencies, and address resource implications.
Lead information-gathering efforts with other UC campuses on lessons learned from future state reorganization efforts.
Campus Systems: Future State Campus Systems Advisory Committee Membership
Name Unit Position Title
Cheryl Dent Chancellor's Office Management Services Officer
Liz Avila Budget Office Principal Budget Analyst
Lisa Sedgwick Division of Academic Affairs Executive Director for Academic Affairs
# Cindy Doherty Academic Personnel Director
Holly Woo California Nanosystems Institute Assistant Director, Administration
Karen Poirier College of Creative Studies Assistant Dean, Administration
* Juli Pippin College of Engineering Assistant Dean for Budget and Administration
Mary Lum College of Letters and Science, HFA Assistant Dean, Division for Humanities & Fine Arts
Joni Schwartz College of Letters and Science, MLPS Assistant Dean, Math, Life & Physical Sciences
Tilly Govender College of Letters and Science, SS Assistant Dean, Social Sciences
* Bryant Wieneke Bren School of Environmental Science Assistant Dean, Planning & Administration
Arlis Markel Gevirtz Graduate School of Education Assistant Dean
Chris Dixon Graduate Division Dir., Financial Support and Business Operations
Laurie Eusey Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies Business Officer
Michelle Keuper Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics Management Services Officer
# Maureen Evans Materials Research Lab Assistant Director
Lynn McLaughlin-Hill Division of Administrative Services Executive Assistant to Vice Chancellor
Brian Richard A.S. Program Management Office Director
Maria Ayllon A.S. Program Management Office UCPath Project Manager
Robert Tarsia Audit and Advisory Services Director
Martin Shumaker Housing & Residential Services Director, Business and Financial Planning
# Tricia Hiemstra Human Resources Director
Eric Sonquist Division of Institutional Advancement Director, Finance & Administration,
Karen Hanson Office of Research Assistant Vice Chancellor for Research
* Allyn Fleming Division of Student Affairs Director, Planning and Administration
* Co-Chairs of the Campus Systems Advisory Committee
# Co-Chairs of the UCPath Business Process Team:
Campus Systems: Future State
Committee Process [DRAFT]: Phase I: Planning & Info Gathering [February – April, 2013]
Work with campus leadership and system implementation
leadership to clarify the post-implementation funding requirements,
funding model, and anticipated departmental assessments (Feb –
March, 2013)
Work with A.S. PMO and business process teams to learn the new
business processes, workflow and interface requirements, and
understand the implications on current business processes and
workflow practices. (March - April, 2013)
Carry out knowledge sharing with other UC campuses who are
further along in the future state planning effort (Feb – April, 2013)
Campus Systems: Future State
Committee Process [DRAFT]:
Phase II: Future State Visioning [April – September, 2013]
Conduct campus-wide visioning sessions with broad
representation of staff and faculty to explore the following
central questions:
What are the key system issues and limitations we are
trying to solve?
What are the opportunities and efficiencies we could
realize?
What are the scenarios for how we could optimize our
staffing structure and workflow to make the most of the
new system capabilities?
Campus Systems: Future State
Committee Process [DRAFT]:
Phase III: Implementation Planning [August – October,
2013]
Based on staffing and workflow model adopted by the
campus leadership and control points, develop a plan
to move from current state to future state
Phase IV: Future State Implementation [October, 2013
– October, 2014]