+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no...

OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no...

Date post: 16-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
58
OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS RICHARD G. MOUTVIC, MD, FACOG
Transcript
Page 1: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS

RICHARD G. MOUTVIC, MD, FACOG

Page 2: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Objectives

Episiotomy and Vaginal Lacerations

Abortion---Spontaneous and Induced

Ectopic Pregnancy

Forceps

Vacuum Extraction

Cesarean Section

VBAC

Page 3: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Episiotomy and Vaginal

Lacerations

Midline Episiotomy

Lateral Episiotomy

Vaginal Lacerations

First, Second, Third, Fourth Degree

Page 4: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Muscles of the Perineal Body

Bulbocavernosus

Transverse perineal

Puborectalis

External Anal Sphincter

Page 5: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 6: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Obstetric Laceration

FIGURE 2. Anal sphincter complex (cadaver dissection).

Page 7: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Abortion

Spontaneous

Induced

Treatment

Suction curettage

D and C

Medical Intervention

Page 8: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Spontaneous Abortion

Spontaneous

Threatened – bleeding in early gestation

Inevitable – bleeding with contractions and dilation

Incomplete – products of conception partially passed

Missed – dead fetus retained without expulsion

Septic-Fever over 100.4F due to infection (endo/parametritis-septicemia)

Page 9: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Spontaneous Abortion

Etiology

Developmental abnormality of zygote, embryo,fetus, placenta

>50% degenerated or absent embryo (blighted ovum)

60% abnormal chromosomes (>30% of 2nd

trimester Ab’s)

Hemorrhage into decidua basalis causes necrosis

Ovum detaches, stimulates contractions

Page 10: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Spontaneous Abortion

Treatment

Observation

Dilation and Curettage (D&C)

Vacuum Extraction (suction curettage)

Page 11: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Induced Abortion

Rate: 238/1000 live births (60% in first 8 weeks, 88% iw/in 12 weeks)

Outpatient centers – up to 15 weeks

Medical centers over 15 weeks

Page 12: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Induced Abortion

Treatment Medical induction agents RU487, Estrogen/Progesterone, Dilatories

Menstrual aspiration

Dilation and Curettage

Dilation and Evacuation

Cervical dilation substances

Uterine stimulants

Partial Birth Abortion

Hysterotomy

Hysterectomy

Page 13: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Female Pelvic Organs

Page 14: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

D and C

Page 15: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Ectopic Pregnancy

Diagnosis

o Abnormal uterine bleeding

o Pelvic Pain

o Positive Pregnancy Test

o Ultrasound

Page 16: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Ectopic Pregnancy

Page 17: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Ectopic Pregnancy

Surgical Treatment

o Laparoscopy, Laparotomy

Medical Treatment

o Methotrexate and others

Page 18: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Laparoscopic view

Page 19: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Female Pelvis

Page 20: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Pelvic Types

Pelvic Types

Gynecoid, Android, Anthropoid, Platypoid

Page 21: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Gynecoid Pelvis

Page 22: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 23: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Android Pelvis

Page 24: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Pelvic Measurements

Inlet

Midplane

Outlet

Page 25: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Mechanisms of Labor

Flexion

Descent

Internal Rotation

Extension

External Rotation

Explusion

Page 26: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

STATION

Plane across ischial spines

Page 27: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Station

-3

-2

-1

0 VTX @ Spines

+1

+2

+3

+4

Page 28: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Position of Fetal Head

Descent---Head enters pelvic inlet in the

transverse

Head Rotates to AP (Internal Rotation)

in the Mid Plan

Head is born by Extension

Page 29: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

29

25

Page 30: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

OP, LOP, ROP, ROT, LOT

Fetal Position

Page 31: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Forceps

Position

BOW must be ruptured

Station

High Forceps >0 station

Mid Forceps> 0 - +2

Low Forceps +3

Outlet Forceps

Page 32: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Forceps

Indications:

Prolonged 2nd stage of labor

Progress has stopped

Inability to push due to anesthesia/analgesia

Fatigue

Immanent delivery is desirable (FHT’S

bleeding, etc. )

Go to Williams Obstetrics for forceps delivery

video

Page 33: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Forceps

Law of Forceps:

Complete cervical dilations

BOW has ruptured

Position is known

Vertex is engaged at +2 station or below

Page 34: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Forceps

Trial of Forceps/Failed Forceps:

o Anticipate difficult delivery with CS ready

o ACOG states: clinical assessment is highly

suggestive of successful outcome

Emphasize proper training

Page 35: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

FORCEPS

Page 36: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 37: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 38: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 39: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Vacuum Extraction

Generally OK after 34 weeks gestation

Indications same as forceps

Page 40: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Vacuum Extraction

Contraindications

Fetal Coagulopathy

Can’t assess position

High station

Non vertex presentation

Suspect cephalic disproportion

Page 41: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Vacuum Extraction

Complications of vacuum extraction

Cephalohematoma

Scalp laceration

Intercranial hemorrhage

Neonatal jaundice

6th and 7th intercranial nerve damage

Skull fracture

Page 42: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Vacuum Extraction

Same rules apply as forceps

Used properly, no more incidence of fetal or

maternal complications than spontaneous

delivery

Abandon procedure if no progress after 3rd

contraction or if cap dislodges > 3 times

Page 43: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Vacuum Extraction

Contraindications

Fetal coagulopathy

Inability to assess position

High station

Non vertex presentation

Suspect cephalo-pelvic disproportion

43

Page 44: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 45: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 46: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 47: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum

IQ tested at age 17- no difference between

spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps

FDA showed 5% skull fracture in nulliparous woman

with over 3 pulls or “pop-offs”.

Forceps causes more 3rd and 4th degree

lacerations

Vacuum causes more retinal hemorrhages (no long

term effects)

Vacuum causes less maternal damage, more fetal

trauma

47

Page 48: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

C-Sections

Percentages of deliveries via C-Section

31% (15-16% primigravidas)

Indications for section

Repeat C-Section

Cephalo pelvic Disproportion (CPD)

Failure to progress---due to fetal size, maternal soft tissues, power of uterine contractions (UC’s), pelvic size

Nonreassuring fetal heart tones

Malpresentation

Shoulder dystocia

Pre eclampsia/Eclampsia

Obesity

Older age of parturiants

Decrease in VBAC

Legal

Page 49: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

C-Sections (cont)

Additional Indications for a C Section

o Medical problems—i.e. DM, Heart, Renal,

Vascular

o Decrease in VBAC (TOLAC=trial of labor

after CS)

o Cord prolapse

o Valuable Baby syndrome

o Elective

o Legal considerations

Page 50: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

50

Page 51: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Placenta Previa

Page 52: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Abruptio Placenta

Page 53: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Types of C-Sections

Classical Incision

Low Classical

Low Transverse Incision

Page 54: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 55: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 56: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

VBAC

Vaginal Birth after C-Section (TOLAC)

Success Rate:

o After CPD

o After Malpresentation

o After Bleeding Disorder

o Current Controversy (New Mexico 80% To 90% due to

restrictions requiring fully equipped OR for immediate

CS)

o ACOG and ASA

Page 57: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture
Page 58: OPERATIVE OBSTETRICS - Semantic Scholar · Comparison of Forceps/Vacuum IQ tested at age 17- no difference between spontaneous delivery, vacuum or forceps FDA showed 5% skull fracture

Recommended