Date post: | 30-Oct-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | pradyoth-c-john |
View: | 140 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Optical Distortion
Team members :
Anurag Mehra
Gunreet Kaur Thind
Mihika Yadav
Mrinal Thakur
Pradyoth C John
Rohit Agarwal
Sharanya G S
Objective
To become a multi-product, multimarket company which can provide effective service anywhere in the country
2/15
Problem
Achieving growth objectives without placing excess stress on limited managerial and financial resources
3/14
Company overview
Optical distortion Inc.- Produces one product, the ODI lenses for chicken
ODI lenses- Invented by Robert D. Garrison and Ronald Olson in 1965
Was issued a US patent in December, 1969 Obtained a long-term license from New World
Plastic for exclusive use of hydrophilic polymer for non- human applications
Two full-time employees- Daniel Garrisson (CEO) and Ronald Olson(VP of marketing)
4/14
Industry Overview
In 1921, the largest farm in the US had 2000 chickens; In 1974, the largest farm had 2,500,000.
Birds were confined in groups of 3-4 in multi-tiered cages
80% of the 440,000,000 laying chickens in 3% of the farms- 25% in 3 states, 36% in another 9 states
Two counties in southern California housed 21,000,000 chickens 5
/12
5/14
6Industry
Small Farms Medium Farms
Large Farms
No. of Birds 10,000 or fewer
10,000 to 50,000
over 50,000
Operated By family Professionally, owned by farmers
Small manufacturing firm
Distribution channel
Sold eggs locally through small grocery stores
Sold to large corporate purchaser
Sold through large grocery chains
6/14
Cannibalism
Pecking order among chickens established through fighting and pecking
Recognition of comb on head preserves pecking order
Submissive birds pecked if head is held high, or for entering territory of a dominant bird
Controlled by debeaking- reduces mortality from 25% to 9%
Alternative- ODI Lenses
7/14
Advantages & Disadvantages of Debeaking
Advantages Disadvantages
Reduced the efficiency of the beak as a weapon
Chickens were subjected to trauma
Reduced mortality 25% to 9% Temporary weight loss and retardation of egg production for at least a week
No expenses apart from labor costs
If the beak was cut too short, it would result in permanent regression. If left too long, then it would grow back
8/15
ODI Lenses
ODI lenses- Used to obscure the vision of chickens; leads to reduction in both cannibalism(from 25% to 4.5%) and savings on food( $800/10000 chicken/year)
Tinted red- affects ability to act out aggression
Patent protected- manufactured by injection molding soft hydrophilic polymer
9/14
Not viable for smaller farms
Lack of skilled manpower
High price
Cannot be re-used
Idea can be easily stolen
Threat of entry of large agricultural firms
Protest from animal rights organisations
No Competition
Big potential market
Medium and Large farms – major part of the market
Licenses technology can’t be used by others
First mover
Patent holder
Minimises cannibalism
Saves on chicken feed
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Weak-nesses
ThreatsOpportu-nities
10/14
Benefits to farmer/chicken
Savings on Cannibalism $ 0.54
Savings on egg loss due to trauma $0.09
Savings on food/year $0.08
Net benefit of ODI $0.70
Net benefit of Debeaking $0.38
Benefit of ODI over Debeaking $0.316
ODI Saves 83.16% more money than debeaking
11/14
Mathematical analysis
Break even analysis
Total cost/pair $0.034
Total fixed cost $955,000
12/12
Selling price
$0.08 $0.16 $0.19 $0.30
Margin $0.046 $0.126 $0.156 0.266
Break even volume
20,979,790
7,608,350 6,140,690 3,596,716
12/14
13Why use ODI?
No trauma nor weight loss in chicken
Guaranteed results- you can’t go wrong with ODI
Make more money!!
83% more savings than debeaking- save $4440 more per 10000 chicken
Save on chicken feed
Save on loss of egg production
Suggestions
Price a pair of lenses at $0.16 (50-50 split in benefits)-penetrative pricing
Visit large farms and install lenses in a relatively small number of chickens
In 6 months, the benefits of ODI lenses would be apparent
Once large farms adopt ODI, others will follow
11/12
13/14
Marketing approach
Segment farms according to size- Small, medium and large
Target medium and large farms, i.e those with more than 10,000 chicken
Concentrate on California market initially; North Carolina and Georgia should be targeted next
Advertise in leading poultry magazines; participate in trade shows
Expand aggressively
12/12
14/14