www.photonics.ethz.ch
Optical Forces – part II 28/11/2014
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Scattering force Proportional to number of incident photons and scattering cross section
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Refraction and reflection of light rays gives forces Fa and Fb whose vector sum is always restoring
Optical Force on a microsphere
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Optical forces in the Dipole Approximation
Optical Force:
Time-average:
thus:
0(for non-relativistic speeds)
time-average:
Dipole Approximation
ARRANGING ..
www.photonics.ethz.ch
/ 1 + sin(2!t)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Optical forces in the Dipole Approximation
Time-average:
Monochromatic fields:
Small particles :
Trapping efficiency :
www.photonics.ethz.ch
OPTICAL TWEEZERS
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Today
Trapping with near fields
Backaction effects
Maxwell stress tensor
Fluctuation induced forces
Trapping of atoms
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Trapping with Near fields
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Optical forces in the Dipole Approximation
(Monochromatic fields)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Trapping with Near fields
z
xy
Refraction
Snell’s law:
z
xy
Total internal reflection (TIR)
Evanescent fields
www.photonics.ethz.ch
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Trapping with Near fields
z
xy
Forces:
Energy flow only along x:
Field enhancement
Evanescent wave in z localization
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Kawata, S. et al. Movement of micrometer-sized particles in the evanescent field of a laser beam. Opt. Lett. 17, 772–774 (1992).
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Surface mode corresponds to pole of transmission coefficient
Field is enhanced at the boundary
Stronger field enhancement with metals (negative ε)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Excitation of SPPs through thin metal film
k of photon in air is always < k of SPP
no excita>on of SPP is possible
Excita>on of SPP through thin film
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Travelling wave Standing wave Local field enhancement
Plasmonic Excitations
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Intensity around sphere (dipole near field)
Approximate structure with a dipole
Plasmonic Trapping
Optical potential: Optical Force:
Field enhancement localization
Remember (planar interface):
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Optical potential:
rt = ro = 5nm εp = 2.5 εm = 1.77 f = 3000
Plasmonic Trapping
Novotny et al. Theory of nanometric optical tweezers. Physical Review Letters 79, 645–648 (1997)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Righini et al. Parallel and selective trapping in a patterned plasmonic landscape. Nature Physics 3, 477–480 (2007)
Plasmonic Trapping
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Trap off
Nature Photonics 5, 349 (2011)
Plasmonic Trapping
flow
trap particle
Size dependent trapping
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
r0 (nm)
I 0(W
μm-2)
Small polarizability Large particle – tip distance
Optimum particle size for trapping
Minimum intensity to trap particle of radius r0 at r0 + rt
Design structures to trap specific particles (polarizability, size) => Sorting of particles
Required trap depth kBT
www.photonics.ethz.ch
www.photonics.ethz.ch
d =3.55 µm d =4.88 µm
0 min 7 min 14 min
Size dependent trapping
Righini et al. Nature Physics 3, 477–480 (2007)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Trapping of atoms
Atomic polarizability : (appendix A)
Rabi frequency
decay rate
transition frequency
transition dipole
Intensities and saturation parameter:
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Trapping of atoms
SODIUM ATOMS
numbers in figure
Doppler shift
www.nano-optics.org www.photonics.ethz.ch
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Backaction effects
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Optical Binding
Tatarkova et al. One-Dimensional Optically Bound Arrays of Microscopic Particles. Physical Review Letters 89, 283901 (2002)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Self induced back-action
=> Cavity - optomechanics (next lecture)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Maxwell stress tensor
MAXWELL:
LORENTZ:
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Maxwell stress tensor
www.photonics.ethz.ch
+
Maxwell stress tensor
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Cooking it up
cycle-average:
(LORENTZ)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Finally …
Forces acting on object B are entirely determined by the fields on a surface enclosing B
www.photonics.ethz.ch
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Forces due to fluctuating fields
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Forces due to fluctuating fields
Fluctuating environment Fluctuating dipole
Forces arise due to correlated fluctuations in the particle and other bodies in the environment
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Time-averaged force:
Monochromatic:
Fluctuating forces are broadband
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Time – averaged force
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Consider one iteration of induced fields / dipole:
environment
G
α
www.photonics.ethz.ch
FLUCTUATION-DISSIPATION THEOREM:
Forces arise due to correlated fluctuations
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Environment
Compact form
Compact form
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Calculation of force when the environment is a single dipole
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Reminder: Greens function for environment = dipole
Field at r due to dipole at r1:
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Force between two fluctuating dipoles
The force is conservative
Casimir-Polder Potential
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Casimir-Polder Potential:
Short distances
Van der Waals potential:
Force between two fluctuating dipoles
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Forces due to fluctuating fields
Forces arise due to correlated fluctuations in the particle and other bodies in the environment
Force between two perfect conductors of area 1µm2 separated by 5nm: 2nN! ⇒ Gecko effect (millions of tiny kreatin hairs)
www.photonics.ethz.ch
Summary
Trapping with near fields field enhancement and strong localization lead to strong gradient forces
Backaction effects: Optical binding, Optomechanics
Maxwell stress tensor General treatment of optical forces
Fluctuation induced forces Correlated fluctuations
Trapping of atoms Frequency dependent polarizability, negative and positive forces, optical cooling