+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert...

Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert...

Date post: 10-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
27
NBSIR 76-1010 /^ Optical Materials Characterization, Albert Feldman, Deane Horowit? and Roy M Waxier CM Inorganic Materials Division Institute for Materials Research mm Irving H. Malitson and Marilyn J. Dodge Optical Physics Division y Institute for Basic Standards \s National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20234 February 1976 Semi-Annual Technical Report Period Covered: August 1, 1976 to January 31.1976 ARPA Order No. 2620 Prepared for Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, Virginia 22209 : , ': A >i public r-sleasej Urn Uniimiied C^D D C MAR 83 1976 A -
Transcript
Page 1: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

NBSIR 76-1010

/^

Optical Materials Characterization,

Albert Feldman, Deane Horowit? and Roy M Waxier

CM

Inorganic Materials Division Institute for Materials Research

mm

Irving H. Malitson and Marilyn J. Dodge

Optical Physics Division y Institute for Basic Standards \s National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20234

February 1976

Semi-Annual Technical Report Period Covered: August 1, 1976 to January 31.1976

ARPA Order No. 2620

Prepared for

Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, Virginia 22209

■ ■:■,■■':■ A

>i public r-sleasej Urn Uniimiied

C^D D C

MAR 83 1976

A -

Page 2: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

NBSIR~76-1010

/^ OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTgRI7ATinM.

JQj A'be^e'dman, Deane^orowtoaai Roy M.M/axler

Inorganic Matsrials Orvision Institute for Materials Research

Irving HiMalitson and Marilyn JJDodge

Optical Physics Division >lnstitute for Basic Standards.

National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20234 Jl f

/--—""""

O" ) Semi-annual technical Repert. 7^ Per ^r^^-^ÜAugw^t^^TS Y' rttTTffTC (2 ARPAlOrder ^.-2(§2^|

Prepared for

Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, Virginia 22209

y

; - ; -

( I'.- _!

1

, :

f

/ v

•r

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. Elliot L Richardson, Secrerery James A. Baker. Ill, Una* Sec/efary Dr. Betsy Ancker Johnson. Assistant Smtary for Scianc* and Taehnohgy \

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS. Ernest Ambler, Acting Oh

tjoi Xii R] •. id i ■:;■ " "■ so ■/■

Dis ibution Unlimited

■ ■

, , -, ._ , -—^„^ ^ _..

■ -" ■*—• »■■>——

Page 3: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION

Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor

Inorganic Materials Division Institute for Materials Research

and

Irving H. Malitson and Marilyn J. Dodge

Optical Physics Division Institute for Basic Standards

ARPA Order No 2620

Program Code Number _ 4Dl0

Effective Date of Contract January 1, 1974

Contract Expiration Date December 31, 1976

Principal Investigator Albert Feldman

(301) 921-2840

The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either express or implied, of the Advanced Research Projects Agency or the U. S, Government.

—, <*»**mimt!! f^HWmm mmmsv**'

" J"" "" I"1' . ^— -

Page 4: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION

Abstract

Refractive index and the photoelastic constants have been measured on specimens of reactive atmosphere processed (RAP) KCi and KC1 nominally doped with 1% KI. T' - refractive indices '.ere measured by the minimum deviation method in the .velenqth range 0.25 um to 15.5 urn. Measurements were made near 20 "C and near J4 0C on the RAP specimen and near 20° on the doped specimen. Each set of experimental data was fitted to a three term Sellmeier-type dispersion equation. The temperature coefficient of index was then computed for the RAP KCI. The data for the different types of KCI were compared to each other and to earlier reported data on commercial KCI. The piezo-optical constants q , q and q and the elasto-optical constants p^, p^ and p44 were obtained at 10.6 wm for the RAP and doped KCI. The measurements required the use of a modified Twyman-Green inter- ferometer capablo of measuring fringe shifts ^,002 of a wave. Within experimental error the coefficients of the two materials agree. Negligible dispersion was found for q^ q^, pj. and p between the visible ano 10.6 urn while a smal] dispersion was found for q and D n44 ^44

"'■"■"■—•^•.'^ T-—^-

Page 5: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

Table of Contents

Technical Report Summary 1

1.1 Technical Problem 1

1.2 General Methodology ,

1.3 Technical Results 2

1.4 Department of Defense Implications 2

1.5 Implications for Further Research 2

2. Technical Report ,

2.1 Refractive Index of Reactive Atmosphere Processed (RAP) Potassium Chloride and Potassium Chloride Doped with Potassium Iodide - Marilyn J. Dodge and Irving H. Malitson .... 3

2.1.1 Introduction 3

2.1.2 Experimental Technique 3

2.1.3 Index Data 4

2.1.4 Temperature Coefficient of Index 6

2.1.5 Conclusions g

2.1.6 Acknowledgement g

2.1.7 References 9

2.2 Photoelastic Constants of Reactive Atmosphere Processed (RAP) Potassium Chloride and Potassium Chloride Doped with Potassium Iodide - Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxier. . 10

2.2.1 Introduction 20

2.2.2 Discussion 2^>

2.2.3 Results , P

2.2.4 Acknowledgement -,-,

2.2.5 References • 13

3. Appendix - Specimen Specifications for Phrc plasticity.-i'-'aV( '1 ,crmal Expansion and Refractive Index Measurements 17

- 1 — * (1 .«r» ,„ , ,—

Page 6: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION

1. Technical Report Summary

1.1 Technical Problem

Windows subjected to high-average-power laser radiation will undergo optical and mechanical distortion due to absorptive heating. If the distortion becomes sufficiently severe, the windows become unusable. Theoretical calcu- lations of optical distortion in laser windows depend on the following material parameters: absorption coefficient, refractive index, change of index with temperature, thermal expansion coefficient, stress-optical constants, elastic compliances, specific heat, thermal conductivity and density. Our program has been established to measure refractive indices, changes of index with temperature, stress-optical constants, elastic compliances, and thermal expansion coefficients of candidate infrared laser window materials.

1.2. General Methodology

Laboratory experiments are conducted for measuring refractive indices, changes of index with temperature, stress-optical constants, elastic compliances, and thermal _xpansicn coefficients.

The refractive indices of prismatic specimens are measured on precision spectrometers by using the method of minimum deviation. Two spectrometers are used. One instrument, which uses glass optics, is used for measuring refractive indices in the visible with an accuracy of several parts in 10 . The other instrument, which uses mirror optics, is used for measuring refractive indices in the ultraviolet and the infrared to an accuracy of several parts in 105. Using both spectrometers we can measure refractive indices over the spectral region 0.2 pm to 50 ym.

We measure the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, a, by a method of Fizeau interferometry. The interferometer consists of a specially prepared specimen which separates two flat plates. Interference fringes are observed due to reflections from the plate surfaces in contact with the specimen. We obtain a by measuring the shift of these interference fringes as a function of temperature.

The change of refractive index with temperature, dn/dT, is measured by two methods. In the first method, we measure the retractive index with the precision spectrometers at two temperatures, 20 0C aad 30 "C, by varying the temperature of the laboratory. This provides us with a measure of dn/dT at room temperature. The second method may be used for measuring dn/dT up to a temperature of 800 °C. We obtain dn/dT from a knowledge of the expansion coefficient and by measuring the shift of Fizeau fringes in a heated specimen as a function of temperature. The Fizeau fringes are due to interferences between reflections from the front and back surfaces of the specimens.

We measure stress-optical coefficients and elastic compliances using a combination of Twyman-Green and Fizeau interferometers. From the shift of fringes in specimens subjected to uniaxial or hydrostatic compression, we obtain the necessary data for determining all the stress-optical constants and

' ■ 1--!«« ^ pj ^

Page 7: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

elastic compliances. In materials with small stress-optical constants or In materials that cannot withstand large stress, we measure the stress-optical effect witli a modified Twyman-Green interferometer, which has a sensitivity of less than O.OlA at 10.6 um. In this case we must know the elastic »nnstants of the material in order to calculate the stress-optical constants.

1.3 Technical Results

Refractive index and the photoelastic constants have been measured on specimens of reactive atmosphere processed (RAP) KCl and KCl nominally doped with 1% KI. The refractive indices were measured by the minimum deviation method in the wavelength range 0.25 \im to 15.5 um. Measurements were made near 20 0C and near 34 °C on the RAP specimen and near 20° on the doped specimen. Each set of experimental data was fitted to a three term Sellmeier-cype dispersion equation. The temperature coefficient of index was then computed for the RAP KCl. The data for the different types of KCl were compared to each other and to earlier reported data on commercial KCl. (Section 2.1).

The piezo-optical constants q^^, q12 and q44 and the elasto-optical constants p-^, p^„ and p44 were obtained at 10.6 Mm for the RAP and doped KCl. The measurements required the use of a modified Twyman-Green inter- ferometer capable of measuring fringe shifts '^.002 of a wave. Within experimental error the coefficients of the two materials agree. Negligible dispersion was found for q^, q^' Pn and p-^ between the visible and 10.6 um while a small dispersion was found for q44 and p. . (Section 2.2).

1 .4 Department of Defense Implications

The Department of Defense is currently constructing high-power infrared laser systems. Criteiia are needed for determining the suitability of different materials for use as windows in these systems. The measurements we are performing provide data that laser system designers can use for determining the optical performance of candidate window materials.

1.5 Implications for Further Research

Measurements of refractive index, change of index with temperature, thermal expansion, stress-optical constants and elastic compliances will be continued on candidate laser window materials. The wavelength of interest will shift from 10.6 um to 3.39 urn, which is within the wavelength range of interest to designers of chemical laser systems (3-5 urn range) .

Apparatus is being procured and assembly of equipment is currently underway for the interferometric measurement of photoelastic constants and dn/dT. A temperature control system is being planned for interferometric measurement of dn/dT to cover at a minimum the temperature range -100 0C to +100 0C which includes the temperatures of interest to military system designers.

We are currently awaiting shipment of specimens under the Laser Window Validation Program. A list of specifications has been sent to Dr. James Stanford at the Naval Weapo.is Center at China Lake. These specifications are included as an Appendix (Section 3.).

•—

Page 8: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

2. Technical Report

2.1 Refractive Index of Reactive Atmosphere Processed (RAP) Potassium Chloride and Potassium Chloride Doped with Potassium Iodide

Marilyn J. Dodge and Irving H, Malitson

2.1.1 Introduction

It has been established that optical distortion ran occur in laser windows subjected to high power laser radiations [l-jj^. To predict the amount of distortion, it is necessary to know the refractive index, n, temperature coefficient of Index, dn/dT, and the thermal-expansion and stress-optical coefficients of candidate laser window materials. An optical materials characterization program is [6] currently in progress at NBS to determine these pertinent optical properties. The refractometry laboratory a* 'IBS is determining the Index of refraction and dn/dT of selected win ow materials over a limited temperature range.

Potassium chloride is one of the most promising candidates in the search for potential window and auxiliary optical component materials for use in high-power laser systems. It has useful transparency from about 0.2 to 20 ym with 90% transmlttance from 0.45 to 14 pm [7]. Recently, ultra pure KC1 having very low absorption [8] has been developed and a specimen grown at Naval Research Laboratory by reactive atmosphere processing (RAP) was made available by Dr. Philip Kline for refractive index and temperature coefficient studies. KC1 doped with ions is also being considered for laser windows. A specimen of KC1 doped with 1.5% KI grown at Honeywell Corporation Research Center was supplied for this investigation by Dr. E. Bernal. A sample of single crystal KC1 grown by traditional techniques at Harshaw Chemical Corporation about 1966 has been studied by this laboratory and preliminary data were previously reported [9]. For comparison purposes with the results of this investi- gation on RAP and doped KC1 the final data of the earlier study are also presented.

2.1.2 Experimental Technique

The specimens were in prismatic form and were measured by means of the minimum-deviation method using a precision spectrometer shown schematically In figure 1[10]. In the ultraviolet, visible and near Infrared regions of the spectrum, the index was measured at known emission wavelengths of mercury, cadmium, zinc and helium. Beyond 2.0 vim a glo- bar was used for the radiant-energy source, and measurements were made

1. Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

2. The use of company and b.a.d names in this paper are for identification purposes only and in no case aoes it imply recommendation or endorsement

by the National Bureau of Standards and it does not imply that the materials used in this study are necessarily the best available.

,.. T r-«»«;_

Page 9: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

at known .ibsorption bands of water vapor, carbon dloxlclo, polystyrene and 1,2-4 trlchlorobenzene. A series of narrow-band Interference filters was also used between i.5 and 10.6 ym. A thermocouple with a cesium iodide window was used for the detector In the Infrared and a photocell was used in the ultraviolet belcw .25 um. This spectrometer- has a .scale which can be read to within one second of arc. Therefore, the refractive i^dex of good optical material can be measured within n few parts in 10 over a wide wavelength range.

The refractive index was deter.nined from the ultraviolet to the Infrared for all samples near 20oC and for the commercial and RAP specimens near 30oC and 340C respectively. E ;ch set of experimental data was

fitted by a least square solution to a three-terra SeiIraeier-type dispersion equation [11] of the form

0 N A.A2

n2-l= -^ . j-1 A'- A.^

The index of refraction is represented by n, A is the wavelength of interest, the A 's are the calculated wavelengths of maximum absorption and the A 's ar^ the calculated oscillator strengths corresponding to the absoriitlon bands. Primary emphasis is fiver to procuring a raathe- ematical fit of the measured data useful for interpolation. The A.'s and the A 's are not intended to have any physical significance anti are influenced by the wavelength range covered by the experimental data.

2.1.3 Index Data

The constants calculated for each dispersion equation, the wavelength range covered by the experimental data, the number of experimental points, and the average absolute residual (the average difference between the experimental values and the calculated values) are given in table 1.

TABLE 1: CONSTANTS FOR DISPERSION EQUATIONS FOR KC1

RAP

20.20oC 33.80oC

Harshaw

19.40oC 29.50oC

KI-Doped

19.90oC

No of Wavelengths

Wavelength Range (luti)

Average absolute residual of index x 105

0.74783561

0.42626630

4.6867104

0.083633417

0.15389998

95.063422

79

0.22-14.4

0.96002778

0.21344321

9.9867010

0.80902239

0.36511458

2.2323342

0.82044813

0.35248240

1.6784518

0.78085271

0.39493953

2.2662238

0.096438975 0.088281620

0.17244608 0.15737774

2.3

137.82107

21

0.28-14.4

6.8

65.870423

58

0.25-15.5

2.9

0.089075558 0.086111530

0.15835015 0.15600595

57.529058 66.360157

39

0.25-15.5

54

0.25-15.5

3.9

rmm m ,« ^ ., ^ , „^ -.-rf—i- "--"-

Page 10: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

. I 1 I r ■ ,,"

- ö * ' ^ ■

< ■

>- ... cc CJ ^-^ _

C-3 o jf

. LU O Jr

- —1 CNJ / C3 oc I

" z < / ■ 00 LU /

< 3:

/ ■ / ~

fr y

n: ^S : ^^^^—~~,~~^ -

- • ' ■

1 1 1 i i o o o o O oo in CM CT> CO m m a} •* *

X3(]N! 3Ali3Vyj]U

0) Ä 4-J

0) ai IM .—I M o M 0) c £ s c

•H *-J o ui oo u •H

c 0 4-1

5 <1> C 03 rt H CM 3 j3 OJ cr U) > l^ OJ • (-1 eg rt

g «d :» u C 4. to c 0 CNI

>+J •H r<

-x. U-l O 03 0) •f)

K- o 4J IH < O c 03 OJ z X o O c- r i LU

LU

OJ -H mE^ w -d 4J •H

> c ü X) < •H B • 5 3 ^^ ai II

aj u-j 0) x; > H ■u H

•H rt 03 ■u Ü E i o w ül 0 to M M oj

M U LU c M-l H •H 0) U E T3 K U

4-> 0) ■u

T-\ >H 03 CN (fl >-. H

JJ cd 9 • cn 60 U E

60 ^ o i—i c •H U H 03 0 fti O ^^ U tM

ts

CM

V* VJ

OJ 01 U-i 0 C X. 0 Vw

4-1 H QJ u OJ a x: Oi QJ 4-1 o 4-1 >. 4-1

03 • Cfl ■H >u 03 U x; M tn 4J (fl ■H g

4-1 3 to QJ 4J ■H

T3 tfl c x: -H > C X 0) a o 4J > QJ 0

•H •H 0) M X) (-1

U-l rH 4J - XI XI •H p. •H 10 CO e „ a X) a w tu e QJ 0 03 O •H O +J 3 O 4-1

E 4J M tn E ■H v> a. >. -H > E •H

OJ O QJ tn c QJ 3 0) x: A •H X) M X ij ÖC 4J u e 4J tj

0 tO 60 o U-l ■H 14-1 tu u-t C cu 0) 0 5 H 6C o •H a c

o to c en •H

E J3 x: >> c c E 03 tn i Xi o 03 QJ u l-i 0) •H u X QJ 6C ^ c ►l W 71 4-1 tJ

03 (U o i-4 —t QJ •H 4-1 XI X) u X T3 TS a» 4-i E C X C

E to OJ o H 03 XI

u o tn o u £ •H l-i T3 tn en 03 • 4-1 4J aj tO QJ • n 03 (J 4-" x: X X n c E a; to QJ 4J 4-1 o XI o 0) a -u O. M-H B ■H x: tn o O 60 P A cfl •u o u 0 c QJ 3 x: •H

en d tn i-( H tn

o m tu C Q.' > u o •H -H H -H > H 0 a.

H CO QJ tO tO X ■H E 4-1 -U ? B H QJ . O 01 C QJ 0) H

60 (U -H QJ -H ^ w B CO •H VJ M x. to a tn •H Ü

(J-. a D. *-• ß to to H tn

''■ ■ ' ."■ - *,,. _.—.—r^ Jl—-lt,,i. 1-1.1—^——_—, — -, „_ . ,

Page 11: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

The stated average absolute residual shows the goodness of fit and is indicative of the accuracy of the experimental data. The largest residuals occur in regions where the largest uncertainties exist in wavelength identifications. Absorption spectra induced by atmospheric conditions superimposed on the absorption spectra being used for measure- ments, especially in the 5 to 8 gin range, and broad, less well defined bands beyond 10 Mm are the primary sources of these errors. Because of the nature of the uncertainties their magnitude is not well known but an error of 0.5% at 10.0 ym would result in an index residual of 18 x 10 . As dn/dX increases, a small error in wavelength assignment will result in larger index residuals. As a check on the individual Sellraeier solutions each set of data was divided into odd and even data points, that is, data points 1,3,5... and 2,4,6..,, and new solutions for each half were obtained. Their excellent agreement showed that the fitting procedure was not sensitive to the increased random error at the extreme wavelengths. A complete repetition of the experiment using the same and new KC1 samples is needed to determine the components of variation related to materials and also other sources of systematic error.

The refractive index was calculated at regular wavelength intervals for each case using the fitted parameters given in table 1. Figure 2 shows the index of the Harshaw sample near 20°C plotted as a function of the wavelength. The index values range from 1.64588 at 0.22 pm to 1.43670 at 14.4 \im.

A graphical comparison of the refractive index near 20oC of the RAP and Kl-doped samples is made with the Harshaw sample in figure 3. The index of refraction of the RAP sample differs from the Harshaw sample by approximately +3 x 10 " from 0.3 to 9.6 urn. Below 0.3 ym the difference rises sharply to +19 x 10 at 0.25 pm, and drops sharply beyond 9.6 Mm to -68 x 10~ at 14.4 \m.

The index values of the Kl-doped sample are higher than those of the Harshaw specimen by about 136 x 10 at 0.25 Mm, drops off to a +60 x 10, at 0.8 vim, remains fairly constant to 8.0 Mm, then drops to -13 x 10 at 14.4 pm.

2.1.4 Temperature Coefficient of Index

The calculated values of index at two temperatures for the Harshaw and RAP KC1 specimens were used to determine An/AT (0C)~l.

The results are plotted as a function of wavelength for each specimen in figure 4. The solid lines represent the An/AT values calculated from the fitted index values using the parameters at the respective temperatures given in table 1. The dashed lines Indicate An/AT calculated from experimental values at specific wavelengths as indicated by the data points on the curves.

-* -■ '■—.; -' :——-.. -..,..

Page 12: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

E a.

- ^ <

13 C rH tU u (0 1 .-C o

05 Tl XI ^-^ 4-1 MX <D ^-v 0) 1) <]> c?

LH M C -C A 0 . u U tq O OJ -H -tJ tn V»-' tn n 0 Si > »H o id 1) i-n r^ y^^ »-I 0 TJ H Ix ri

X OJ 3 T3 £ <1 3 t) (U H U -H w 01 4-1 0 14-4

TJ N rH ,c a tfl sf O c Ü "4-1 O H u • i M ■H i/) O tf) 0 QJ -t tu

M T3 4J P fsl 1-4 IU U 4-1 OJ \u C c fl 3 0 •H SES « OJ 0) 14-1 4-1

b T3 tn 4J 0 tfl (J J3 OJ tn a) u c tJ D. ■u OI M o m 01 tu «H 0 • tn tj D. r< u D

•H U 4J /-^ H 3 fl) 4-1 3 E U as *—' OJ 3 U ^ 4-1 tu

•H 01. 0) Ü to 4J (fl 4-1 <+J o H ;• rH h /-^ tfl U IM H U M CO 01 • !U c 0) ^—' M 3 U D. ^-^ n 0. to Ü o S 4J F (L u £ rH H OJ tn tfl aj F

4J n) 4-i 1 4J 4-/ •n 4-1 QJ 60 ■u o ^-v C tfl u C tn u 0 •H r^ fl D OJ >. *J o 3 C t« tfl "O

4-J H U 0) ^—^ 4J c M d) c tC OJ u tn F to M > H 4-1 tfl F. 0) ffl Oi M < to iJ 0 m OJ 4) p- > H 0) ^^ tfl VJ rH rH b w S c tn X) H-J u a P OJ u^ c o < tu 0 fl F H o •H i—1 3 * ■n M-J tfl tfl

en ^ 4J r-( 4J ai to tn c C tfl ■r4 4^ tn • 0 3 rH 0) > 3 to •H IS fc <r •H « u tn i—i 5^ u Ä b^ OJ X tn 3 H • u (A n 0) OJ U <1 to

Wj c M &4 o. •0 c H ■>». l-i 0) •H 3 « a OJ c •H to c tfl ,2 u- IfJ SB o2 M •H rH <J <:i PC 4-J

(JO.IjOl« U

'

... i i t r —i 1 T 1 1 1

• a

_ UJ 1 a. :

- S _ < -— 1 mm er LU CJ ac ^ ' u. u. - o o _

- Z X O "4

-

11 < a. 1 o _ o _

- / - - 1 - - / - - ^S - - — ~J - ~

1 1 1 , ..J 1 .J_ ._i,_ 1 1 1

-

E a.

o o

o I

,01 « UV

QJ i X! OJ 4-1 3 >

ta to 14-, x! s O tn

1-4 14H 0) X tB c is . Oi SB 4J (U

T3 c c C 01 O >4H •H

■H X. •H O rH u 4-1 1

OJ CJ x O > i g 0) u

•H 5 3 -a ai U t-i iw c N O 14H •H tfl tfl 0) >-i tn 01 4=

IK 0) 03 XI tfl H

4-1 0) H VJ d. P-

| U 43 c tfl o

•H tfl O ^~. X) CN QJ 0)

W rH rH 4H 0) u V4 tfl C u S CO U tu c 0) tfl tn OJ -o c OJ U OJ o VJ tu ai-i -H Ou

14H o « B 0) KH TS M Ä u •H | 4J ■d H rH -H tn

M tfl »J •H (U 4-1 Cfl

^-g « 6C rH >. o u

tfl H H M • iH 1 m u <D x: tfl

M i-H 4-1 x • 00 60 tn oc a. a c VJ

S^ •H OJ CO tfl rH X

■'"■^ - T- -— ~ - —— -—.-.. ..^ ..

Page 13: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

The maximum ditferenge between the two curves for An/AT of Harshaw KCl' is eight parts in 10 between 10 and 1A pm, where the wavelength values corresponding to the experimental data have greater uncertainties. The curve representing the va1ues based on the experimental data is of the same general shape as a curve based on published values by Paschen in 1908(12]. Thla curve also has the form which might be predicted f*-om Liiermo-optic behavior of solid:) [13]. "he negative An/AT indicates that a decrease in the density of the material is the primary factor effecting the change In index with an increase in temperature. The fact that An/AT becomes lens negative near the UV and IR primary absorption edges indicates a shift of these edges towards longer wavelengths with Increasing temperature.

The An/AT curves based nn fitted and expprimpnt.-il value« for the RAP KCl have essentially the same shape. Again the maximum difference between the two curves is 8 x 10 between 12 and l'i um. Although the rise in An/AT between 4 um and 9 or 10 pm followed by the sharp drop In An/AT shown by both of these curves is not what would be expected, the very careful analysis of the data described earlier and the fact that the two curves both show the same trend makes these findings difficult to dispute at this time.

2.1.5 Conclusions

This study indicates that KCl grown by traditional techniques and that grown by the new reactive atmosphere process have about the same index of refraction between 0.3 and 10.0 ym with the absolute differences in index increasing on either side of this range. The addition of the 1.5% dog^nt of KI, however, increased the index generally by about 60 x 10 in the visible and infrared to about 9 \sm when it starts decreasing, and becomes about equal to the Harshaw Rample at 14 ym.

All of the data presented in this p?>per are for these particular samples and under the specific conditions stated. Caution should be used before applying any of these values to a sample of KCl of unknown origin.

Because of the lack of published data to support or dispute the An/AT curves which have been presented here, repeated measurements on the same samples are scheduled. Index and temperature coefficient determinations on other samples of KCl of the same types as those presented here might be Indicated to determine if these findings are typical or peculiar to the samples in this investigation.

2.1.6 Acknowledgement

The authors express their sincere appreciation to Mr. Joseph M. Cameron, Chief, Office of Measurement Services at NBS for his careful analysis of the index and An/AT data and his helpful comments and suggestions.

Page 14: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

2.1.7 References

[1] [2] [3]

[4]

[5]

17]

18] [9] [10]

[11] [12]

[131

M. Sparks, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 5029 (1971). J. R. Jasperse and P. D. Gianlno, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1686 (1972). B. Bendow, J. R. Jasperse, and P. D. Glanino, Opt. Comniun, 5, 98 (1972). B. Bendow, P. D. Glanino, A. Hordvlk, and L. H. Skolnik, Opt. Commun. ]_y 219 (1973) . B. Bendow and P. D. Glanino, Appl. Phys. 2, 1 (1973). A. Feldman, 1. Malitson, D. Horowitz, R. M. Waxier and M. Dodge, Laser Induced Damage in Optical Materials: 1974, NBS Special Pub. 414, 141 (1974). Harshaw Optical Crystals, The Harshaw Chemical Co. (1967). Dr. Philip Kline, Naval Research Laboratory, private communication. See Reference 6 W. S. Rodney and R. J. Spindler, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stds. (U.S.), 51, 123 (1953). L. E. Sutton and 0. N. Stavroudis, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 901 (1961). A. Smakula, Office of Technical Services, U.S. Dcpt. of Comracrce (October 1952), p. 66. S. Ramaseshan, K. Vedam, R. Krishnan, in Progress in Crystal Physics, Vol. I, edited by R. Krishnan (Intersclence Publishers, New York, London, 1960), p. 139,

Page 15: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

2.2 Photoelastic Constants of Reactive Atmosphere Procossod (RAP; Potassium Chloride and Potassium chloride Doped Will, Pot.iHsium Todido - Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. W.ixh-j

2.2.1 introduction

The measurement of piezo-optical constants of materials in Liu- infrared is part of a program of optical materials characterization. The properties measured in this program are, refractive index, temperature coefficient of index, thermal expansion coefficient, photo-elastic constants, and elastic- constants. These parameters are necessary for evaluating the performance of high-power infrared laser windows subjected to intense laser radiation. Absorption of a relatively small fraction of this radiation can produce temperature and stress gradients of sufficient maqnitude to produce intolerable optical distortion and hence to render a window useless.I»2

In this paper we present the photoelastic constants of reactive atmosphere processed (RAP) KCl and KCl doped with KI. We measured the constants at 10.6 urn using a Soleil-Babinet type compensator and a modified Twyman-Green inter- ferometer. The precision of measurement required in order to obtain reasonably precise values for the coefficients was 'v.002 of a fringe shift at 10.6 because of the inability of the specimens to withstand large stresses.1

2.2.2 Discussion

The definition of the piezo-optical coefficients has been discussed extensively in the literature and need not be discussed here. There are three independent coefficients, q.., q and q for cubic materials of class m3m to which KCl oelongs. The coefficients q and q = q - q describe stress-induced birefringence in a material? whereas giV1 and q2

individually are needed to describe the absolute change of refractive 12

index due to stress.

ini

The stress-induced birefringence is measured most easily and with the greatest precision with a de Senarmont compensator and we have successfully used this apparatus in the visible on the two types of KCl.5 However, in the infrared at 10.6 Mm this apparatus is not readily available; hence, we use a Babinet-Soleil type compensator. The experimental arrangement is shown in Figure 5. The variable wave plate (VWP) is a specimen of single- crystal Ge in the form of a rectangular prism 12 x 12 x 36 mm with the [100] axis along the long dimension. The specimen is placed in a screw clamp stressing apparatus 6 and stress is applied along the [100] axis at an angle of 45° with respect to the vertical in a plane perpendicular to the beam axis. The purpose of the VWP is to appropriately polarize the beam in order to maximize the intensity transmitted through the wire-grid polarizer, which is also oriented at 45° with respect to the vertical in the plane perpendicular to the beam axis.

The compensator is the same as the VWP except that a calibrated precision stressing frame is used with the stress along the vertical. The stressing frame has been discussed in the literature.7 The Ge specimen in the frame is calibrated by obtaining the shift of a specified number of fringes as a function of the applied force and by calculating the fringe shift per unit applied force (AN/AF)

Ge

10

■■"j... « ,...,,--—^HJI m •.:'..'- _ jfi ..IJ)^. ■

Page 16: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

'■

FOCUSING MIRROR

LASER RADIATION«

CHOPPER

PVROELECTRIC DETECTOR

BEAM STOP

BEAM SPLITTER

POLARIZER

COMPENSATOR

SPECIMEN

MIRROR

Fiqure 5. Apparatus for measuring stress-induced birefringence.

LOCK-IN AMPLIFIER AC AMPLIFIER

FOCUSING MIRROR

MIRROR ON P2T DRIVE

LASER RADIATION

Figure 6. Apparatus for measuring absolute piezo-optic constants,

11

_ —^ . -

Page 17: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

The unknown specimen is placed in a similar calibrated precision stressing frame, with the stress applied along the vertical. The specimen has the same dimensions as the VWP and the compensator. The retardation Ln the specimen is measured as follows: Stress is applied to the compensator until a first order null is obtained, which occurs at an applied force of about 2700 N (600 lbs.). A small incremental stress is then applied to the specimen AF^ci which produces a signal at the detector. The force on the compensator is then either increased or decreased by an amount AFQ unl i 1 the system is returned to a null and the stress readings are recorded. This procedure is repeated until what we consider to bo the maximum allowable force is applied to the specimen. For the RAP KCl this force is 178 N (40 lbs.) yielding a stress of 11 bars, and for the KT doped KCl this force is 356 N (80 lbs.) yielding a stress of 21 bars. With these data and with the Ge calibration, we obtain the stress birefringence constants for the KCl from the equation

AF. 'w ,AN Gc

1 ^F' AF n Ge KCl

q

q

qil " qi2

q44

for [100] stress

for [111] stress (1)

where A is the wavelength, w is the specimen width, and n is the specimen refractive index. Equation (1) is valid because AF^ varies linearly with A^ Ge ^ AFKCi-

The method for measuring the absolute piezo-optic constants q, and qi2 with a modified Twyman-Green interferometer has been described m -virlier publications '"; consequently it will not be described here. Slight modifications have been made to the apparatus, however, and these are shown in Figure 6 which is a schematic of the apparatus. A VWP has been added to permit orientation of the radiation polarization vector either parallel or perpendicular to the stress axis of the specimen. A wire-grid polarizer has been added to correct for errors in the sotting of the VWP and to insure that radiation of the proper polarization reaches the detector. In addition, focusing optics have been added to the detection system to permit detection of smaller radiation power. The use of lower power diminishes the possibility of heating of optical elements due to residual absorption which could produce drift in the interferometer. Thus, although the CO2 laser used has an output power of about 4 watts, measurements are usually made with an attenuated power of less than 500 mW.

The fringe shift per unit applied force AN/AF is measured on a specimen subjected to [001] stress for the radiation polarized parallel to the stress axis and then for radiation polarized perpendicular to the stress axis. The piezo-optical constants are obtained from the equation

Aw AN 2 AF T q " nsi2

q = q^ for e [001]

q = q12 for e J_ [001] (2)

where e is the polarization vector.

2.2.3 Results

The piezo-optical constants of pure and doped single-crystal specimens of KCl were measured at 10.6 pm. The four specimens are listed in Table 2 together with their crystallographic orientations. The constants we obtained are listed at the bottom of Table 3 together with earlier reported data in the

12

-- ——-- . - - .

Page 18: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

visible. In computing q-^ and q^ we used a value of s12 = -3.63 x lO~12in2/N

which is an average of many values presented in the literature.10 Earlier we had reported preliminary stress-optical constant values at 10.6 um5; however, the data we present here have a greater precision. The errors given represent the standard deviation of many measurements and the size of the errors corres- ponds to a fringe shift of approximately .002 A at 10.6 urn. The values for qll ~ ql2 that we Present are data obtained independently from g and q

An examination of Table 3 shows that earlier workers did not report values for the coefficients q11 and q , but rather values for p and p . They do report values for q - q and q A comparison1^ our data with the earlier work suggests that some dispersion exists in q in going from the visible to 10.6 pm, whereas the dispersijn in q -4q is negligible within the experimental error. Our data al.so indicate 12

that, within experimental error, the dispersions in q ;nd q individually are also negligible. 12

At the lower part of Table 4 we list the elasto-optic constants wc have calculated from the pie?.o-optical constants using the formula

rik ^i] 3k KJ}

3 -12 2 19 9

where s = 26.9 x 10 m /N and s44 = 150.7 x 10 m /N. The elastic compliance components are an average of values from a compilation which contains a large variation in values. A comparison of our values with values of other workers indicates agreement for some values, and disagreement for others. There is little dispersion in p and p but some dispersion in PAA- 44

In the calculations we have used the same elastic constants for both the doped and the RAP KC1 because of lack of values for the undoped. On this basis the measurements and calculations indicate that, within experimental error, the piezo-optical constants of the two types of material are the same.

2.2.4 Acknowledgement

We thank E. Bernal of Honeywell and P. Klein of the U. S. Naval Research Laboratory for supplying materials for the specimens.

2.2.5 References

1. M. Sparks, J. Appl. Phys. £2, 5029 (1971). 2. J. R. Jasperse and P. D. Gianino, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1686 (1972); B. Bendow

and P. D. Gianino, Appl. Phys. 2, 1 (1973); B. Bendow, P. D. Gianino, A. Hordvik, and L. H. Skolnik, Optics Commun. 7, 219 (1973).

3. W. W. Wilkening, J. Friedman, and C. A. Pitha, in Third Conference on High Power Infrared Laser Window Materials, 19?.*, ARCRL-TR-74-0085-I.

4. J. F. Nye, Physical Properties of Crystals (Oxlord University Press, London, 1957), pp. 243-254.

5. A. Feldman, D. Horowitz, and R. M. Waxier, in Laser Induced Damage in Optical Materials: 1975, to be published as a Special NBS Publication.

6. A. Feldman, D. Horowitz, and R. M. Waxier, in Third Conference on High Power Infrared Laser Window Materials, 1973, AFCRL-TR-74-0085-I, p. 403.

7. A. Feldman and W. J. McKean, Rev. Sei. Instrum. 46, 1588 (1975).

13

._ „—, ^- -._. , .. .

Page 19: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

8. A. Feldman, I. H. Malitson, D. Horowitz, R. M. Waxier and M. Dodge, in Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Infrared Laser Window Materials, 1974, p. 117.

9. A. Feldman, R. M. Waxier, and D. Horowitz, in Optical Properties of Highly Transparent Solids, edited by S. S. Mitra and B. Bendow (Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1975), p. 517.

10. R. V. G. Sundara Rao, K. Vedam, and R. S. Krishnan, in Progress in Crystal Physics, Vol. I, edited by R. S. Krishnan (Tnterscience Publishers, New York, London, 1960), p. 89.

i.*4

^....„.^ —-- --r- .. M-M . ...^ .„^

Page 20: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

Specimen

Table 2. Specimen Orientations

Orientation

Stress Propagation

1 - RAP KC1 [001] [110]

2 - RAP KC1 [111] [110]

3 - Doped KC1(1% KI nom) [001] [110]

4 - Doped KC1(1% KI nom) [110] [001]

Constants Measured

qil' qi2' qil " qi2

144

qil' qi2' qil - qi2

Ma

-12 2 Table 3. Piezo-Optic Constants of KCl (10 m /N)

A (ym) ^1 l12 14 4 ^1 '12 Ref.

.589

.589

.589

.480

.589

.633

.633

.644 4.6 +.2 2.7 +.8

* .633 * .644

4.6 +.2 2.8 +.2

10.6 10.6 10.6

* 10.6 4.3 +.3 4.2 +.2

2.8 +.3 2.5 +.2

-4.22 -4.42 -4.94

-4.74

1.67 1.66 1.47 1.42 1.57

3 9 + 8 4 4 4. 2 4 6 + 2 4 7 + 2

2 .62 3 4 + 4 3 .6 + 3

81 7 +.4 9 +.4 9 +.2 9 +.1

2.0

1.8 +.4 1.8 +.2

a b C d e

f

g g g g

h

♦Nominally doped with 1% KI

F. Pockels, Lehrbuch der Kristalloptik (Teubner, Leipzig, 1906), p. 480.

Bhagavantam and Y. Krishna Murty, Proc. Indian Acad. Sei. A46, 399 (1957).

K. G. Bansigir and K. S. lyengar, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 71B, 225 (1958) . dR. Srinivasan, Zeit. f. Physik 155, 281 (1959).

K. V. Krishna Rao and V. G. Krishna Murty, Proc. Indian A^ad. Sei. 64^, 24 (1966)

Reference 3.

Reference 5. 1C. S. Chen, J. Szcznesniak, and J. C. Corelli, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 303 (1975).

C. A. Pitha and J. D. Friedman, in Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Infrared Laser Window Materials, 1974, compiled by C. R. Andrews and C. L. Strecker.

15

..- - m.t^g yn^mHm. |j_ ^,.

Page 21: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

Table 4. Elasto-Optic Constants of KC1

:'K. S. lyengar, Nature 176, 1119 (1955)

K. V. Krishna Rao and V. G. Krishna Murty, Proc. Indian Acad. Sei. 64 24 (1966). —

A dim) Pll P12 P44 P12/Pll Re f.

. 589

.589

.589

0.215

0.246

0.159

0.192

-0.0276

-0.024

-0.0298 -0.74

-0.78 b

c

.633

.644

* .633

* .644

0.21

0.21

0.15

0.15

-0.026

-0.029

-0.031

-0.031

-0.70

-0.72 •

10.6

no. 6 0.20

0.19

0.15

0.14 -0.023

-0.024 -0.76

-0.71

♦Nominal ly doped with 1% KI

aF. Pock els, Lehrbuch der Kristalloptik (Teubner, Leipz ig, 1906), p. 480.

16

""«T'""- -" i ——

Page 22: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

3. Appendix

Specimen Specifications for Photoelasticity, dn/dT,

Thermal Expansion, and Refractive Index Mea^-rements.

17

- - — .

Page 23: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

I. Photoelasticity Specimens

A. Specifications

1. Dimensions - Rectangular prism 1/2" x 1/2" x 1-1/2" (12 x 12 x 36 mm)

2. Polish two opposite 1/2" x 1-1/2" (12 x 36 mm) faces.

a. Flatness - One (1) fringe 0.632H pm radiation when viewed against an optical flat aero;;;; 90% of the central aperture area,

b. Parallelism* - Cix (G) fringes of 0.0320 piti radiation

when viewing Fizetv interference between both polished faces.

* Alternate parallelism specification: wedge angle between polished faces to be 25+ 5 minutes.

3. Grind all other surfaces so that the angles between all adjacent surfaces to be 90° ± 1 min. of area. No noticeable wedges, ridges or bumps shall be seen when testing angles with a precision machinist's knife-edge square. (In a wedged specimen this specification will hold for one polished face and the four ground surfaces.)

4. For single crystal specimens, orient the axes of the specimen along specified crystallographic axes to within one-half degree (1/2°).

5. Use grinding and polishing techniques that minimize adding Strain to the specimen.

6. Polish faces to be perpendicular to the growth or deposition direction, if one exists and if compatible with above speci- fications.

B. Specimens Required

1. Amorphous or polycrystalline specimens - supply one parallel and one wedged.)

2. Cubic material specimens - supply one parallel and one wedged for each crystallographic orientation:

a. Long axis along [100]; other faces arbitrary.

b. Long axis along [111]; other faces arbitrary. If not available then an alternate form would be long axis along [110] and short axes along [110] and [001] with the [001] faces polished.

18

r*<r.—^r--—— v. .

Page 24: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

3. Other crystal classes - contact us for required specimen orientations.

4. If possible supply duplicates of above spe cimons.

™;~ I——■

19

Page 25: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

II. Specimens for dn/dT and Thermal Expansion/

A. Specifications

1. Dimensions - Plate 1/2" dia. x 1/4" to 1/2" thick. (12 mm dia. x 6 to 12 mm thick). (Plate may be nominally 1/2" square x 1/4" to 1/2" thick.)

2. Polish flat surfaces.

a. Flatness - One (i) fringe 0.6328 „m radiation when viewed against an optical flat across 90% of the central aperture area.

b. Parallelism - Three (3) fringes of 0.6328 Mm radiation in a circular pattern when viewing Fizeau interference between both polished faces.

3. Polished faces to be perpendicular to the growth or deposition direction if one exists.

B. Specimens Required for dn/dT

1. Cubic*, polycrystalline, and amorphous materials - supply two specimens.

* Cubic specimens require no particular crystallographic orientation.

2. Other crystal classes - contact us for required specimen orientations.

C. Specimens for Thermal Expansion - Identical with dn/dT specimens Two are required which may be prepared simultaneously with dn/dT specimens.

20

"T —.r ~—- ■ - ■

Page 26: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

«

III. Refractiv« Index Specimens

A. Specifications

1. Triangular prism with tv/o polished rectangular faces approximately 1" (2.5 cm) square.

2. The angle between the two polished faces,0 , to be given by the formula

-1 .866 8 - 2 sin n

within one (1) degree, where n is the maximum nominal index value, but 9 is not to exceed 70°.

3. Polish the faces flat to 1/8 wave 0.633 urn light if possible.

B. Specimens Required

1. Cubic*, polycrystalline and amorphous material - supply one specimen.

* Cubic specimens require no particular crystallographic orientation.

2. Contact us for specimen requirements for non-cubic crysta]s

3. As a test for homogeneity, supply specimens from different portions of a batch or from different batches.

USCOMM NHS DC 21

■ -——_„, _

Page 27: Optical Materials Characterization, · 2013-09-05 · OPTICAL MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION Albert Feldman, Deane Horowitz and Roy M. Waxlor Inorganic Materials Division Institute for

MbJ-l I4A IRE V 773)

7. AUTIIOR(S)

h. Feldman^ D. Horowitz, R. Waxier, I. Malitson and M.. Dodgo

!1

U.S. DEPT . OF COMM

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET

1. PUUI.K Al ION OK HI I'OK I NO.

NBSIR 76-1010 ^

2. dov't Ate rssioi No.

4, III 1.1. AM) SUHl I 11.1.

Optical Materials Characterization ..'

9. 1M.K1 OKMINl. OKCANl/AI ION NAMI. ANH ADOKl-SS

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20234

12. Sponsoring Organizatiun Name and Complete Address (Street, City, State, i-IP)

Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, Virginia 22209

3. Krc iim-nt's Actcssion Nu.

5. I'uMii at ion I'.irc

February 1976

6* IVrformmg (V^;.tni/.i(ion ( od»

8. Pcrforminj! Orpan. Report N. .BSIR 76-1010

10. (Toi.u/ iask Work Unil No. 3ls>0442

1 !• Cotftrocl/Ciranl No.

2620

13. fypc of Rcpon Ik I'ITUKI Covered

Semi-Annual Tech.Report fl-1-7.r: tn L=JQ-=2£ 14. Sponsoring Agency Cod(

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

A ■•"—»

4- 16. ABSTRACT {A JOO-word or less factual summary ol most sigpilicant information. ILdqcument includes a significant

bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.) färf/f G"* tM1** ■ *tLOH fÜL l )

Refractive index and the photoelastic constants have been measured fcn specimens of reac tive atmosphere processed (RAP) KC1 and KC1 nominally doped with l?a(^J.. The refractiv£ indices wer9 measured by the minimum deviation method in the wavelength range 0.25ijinf t 15.5 ifin^ Measurements v^re i. ade near 20 0C and near 34 0C on the RAP specimen and near 20 *C on the doped specimen. Each set of experimental data was fitted to a three term Sellmeier-type dispersion equation. The temperature coefficient of index was then computed for the RAP KCl. The data for the different types o^ KC1 were compared to e^ciji other .nd to earlier reported data on commercial KCl. The pie^o-optical constants q.., fT^'and qjf and the elasto-optical constants p^T p. ^pSncI p . wote obtained at 10.6 urn 5W" 14'i 44 for the RÄ^ and doped KCl. The measurements requireS the usg^^si^odified Twyman-

shifts^>.002 of "a wave. Within Green interferometer capable of measuring fringe )effi experimental cj^r, th^p^effici

was found for q.w ^lo'Pi] ^n° Negligible dispersion

persion was found for %? and ^4

ents of the two materials agree, p _'Between the visible and lO.ö^Im while a small dis-

AtCäB»**

17. KEY V'ORDS (six to twelve entries, alphabetical order; c.ipilalixe only the first letter ol the first key word unless a proper name; separated by semicolons) Birefrinqence; eiastooptic constants? infrared-laser window

materials; interferometry; KCl; photoelasticity; piezo-optic constants; refractive index; stress-optical constants; thermal coefficient of refractive index.

18. AVAILABILITY [£ Unlimited

[ _ For Official Distribution. Do Not Release to NTIS

' ' Order From Sup. of Doc, U.S. Ciovernment Printing Office Washington, D.C. 2010.', SO ( .n. No. t \T.

(jj Order From National Technical information Service (NTIS) Springfield, Virginia 221^1

19. SECURITY CLASS (THIS RFPORT)

UNCLASSIIIFD

20. SIX UUITV ( LASS (THIS PAGE)

UNCLASSIFIFD

21. NO. OF PAGES

2b 22. 1'r

|4.00 USCOMM DC 29042-IJ74

'

----— 11-11 .-..--W- -m^„_..


Recommended