+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences...

Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences...

Date post: 24-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: maximillian-heath
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine
Transcript
Page 1: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Michael FerrisUniversity of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences

David ShepardUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine

Page 2: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Overview

• Details of machine and problem• Formulation

– modeling dose– shot / target optimization

• Results– Two-dimensional data– Real patient (three-dimensional) data

Page 3: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Page 4: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Page 5: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Page 6: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

The Leksell Gamma Knife

Page 7: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Page 8: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Problem characteristics

• Machine has 201 radiation sources focussed on one location

• Very accurate dose delivery• Benefits of computer solution

– uniformity of treatment plan– better treatment plan– faster determination of plan

Page 9: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Problem outline

• Target volume (from MRI or CT)• Maximum number of shots to use

– Which size shots to use– Where to place shots– How long to deliver shot for

– Conform to Target (50% isodose curve)– Real-time optimization

Page 10: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Two-dimensional example

Page 11: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Ideal Optimization

mints;xs;ys

Dose(NonTarget)

subject to Dose(i; j ) =X

s2S

tsD(xs;ys; i; j )

1ô Dose(Target) ô 2ts õ 0Sj j ô N

Page 12: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Page 13: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Dose calculation

• Measure dose at distance from shot center

• Fit a nonlinear curve to these measurements

• Functional form from literature, 6 parameters to fit via least-squares

1à m1 erf ( û1

xà r1) à m2 erf ( û2

xà r2)

Page 14: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

8mm shot

Page 15: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Nonlinear ApproachLet xs;ys bevariable locations

s = 1;2;. . .;ND(xs;ys; i; j ) is nasty nonlinear function

What width shot touseat xs;ys?

s;w =1 if shot s is width w0 else

ú

T s;w ô ts;w ô T s;wPw s;w ô 1

Page 16: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Two-stage approach

• Approximate via “arctan”

• First, solve with approximation, then fix shot widths and reoptimize

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

8s 2 SPwarctan(ts;w) ô 2

ù

Page 17: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

3D slice image

Page 18: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Slice + 3

Page 19: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Axial slice Manual Computer Optimized

Page 20: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Axial slice Manual Computer Optimized

Page 21: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Coronal slice Manual Computer Optimized

Page 22: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Sagittal slice Manual Computer Optimized

Page 23: Optimization of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Michael Ferris University of Wisconsin, Computer Sciences David Shepard University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Challenges

• Integration into real system• Reduction of optimization time• What if scenarios?

– Improve the objective function– Change number of shots

• Global versus local solutions


Recommended