Date post: | 11-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Science |
Upload: | albert-paul |
View: | 415 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Identification of Process Parameters influencing Product Quality in Mammalian Cell Culture
Albert Paul
Institute of Applied Biotechnology (IAB) Biberach
24th ESACT Meeting Barcelona, Spain
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 2
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) • Most successful biopharmaceuticals
Protein aggregation • Quality, safety and efficacy issues • Occurs in all steps of manufacturing • Aggregates are removed in DSP
Reduced process yields
• Upstream reduction of aggregation Reduced burden on DSP Increased process yield Relative little known
Introduction
M
DSP
Protein Aggregation
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 3
USP analysis of mAb aggregates is difficult • No single analytical method to cover entire size
range of aggregates • Contaminants complicate analysis in cell culture
DNA, lipids, and host cell proteins
• Evaluation of aggregate levels in cell culture Protein A purification step SEC analysis
• Capture step exposes antibodies to pH-shifts, which influences the aggregation itself
[Joubert et al., J Biol Chem 2010]
[Paul et al., Pharm Res 2012]
Introduction
10nm
Methods for USP analysis of mAb aggregate formation
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 5
SE-HPLC analysis • NaCl induction
– mAb1 (1 mg/ml) – NaCl: 0-1.5 M Concentration-dependent formation
of mAb dimer
• Freeze-thawing (FT) – mAb2 (1 mg/ml) – FT cycles: -80°C/25°C for 15 min MAb dimer and tetramer formation
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 6
SE-HPLC analysis • MAbPac SEC-1 (A) and Yarra S4000 (B) • NaCl-induced mAb in SFM4CHO (A) • FT-induced mAb in CHO DG44 supernatant (B)
Results Host cell/medium components elute later Monomer and aggregates detectable Quantification possible
[Paul et al., BMC Biotechnol 2014]
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 7
SE-HPLC analysis • Aggregate formation during batch cultivation
− CHO mAb producer cell line − Supernatant analysis
Directly after inoculation After 144 h cultivation
• Results − After inoculation
No signals for mAb − After 144 h cultivation
Aggregates and monomer detectable − Quantification
Monomer 23% ± 0.4% Dimer 10% ± 0.3% Oligomers 67% ± 0.7%
[Paul et al., BMC Biotechnol 2014]
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 8
Analysis using fluorescence dyes • Extrinsic fluorescence dyes
− Thioflavin T (ThT) − 4-4-bis-1-phenylamino-8-naphthalene sulfonate (Bis-ANS)
• Fluorescence dye-based aggregation (FDBA) assay − Fluorescence spectroscopy Soluble aggregates
• Fluorescence microscopy − NyONE : Fully automated cell imager Large HMW species
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
ThT
Bis-ANS
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 9
FDBA-assay – CHO mAb cells cultivated for 120 h in SFL,
TFL and TPP – Analysis: SE-HPLC (A), 100 µM ThT (B) and
10 µM Bis-ANS (C) – Controls: SFM4CHO medium, untreated
(negative ctr) and stressed mAb2 in medium (positive ctr)
Results Aggregate content (TPP<SFL<TFL)
successfully determined using both dyes ThT lower signal for cell culture samples
than controls Bis-ANS suitable for cell culture samples
[Paul, Schwab et al., Anal Bioanal Chem 2015]
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 10
• CHO DG44: 4x105 cells/mL • 1M NaCl stressed mAb • 25 µg/mL mAb • 10 µM Bis-ANS
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
Fluorescence microscopy CHO cells (BF) CHO cells + mAb aggregates (BF) CHO cells + mAb aggregates (UV/Green)
• Results Large HMW species visible HMW species distinguishable from
CHO cells MAb aggregates detectable
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 11
• CHO mAb cells • 4x105 cells/mL • SFM4CHO medium • 118 h cultivation • 0.2 µM Bis-ANS • Results
Particles of different sizes detected
Increase of particles over cultivation time
USP analysis of mAb aggregates
Fluorescence microscopy
Identification of Process Parameters influencing Protein Aggregation
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 13
Process parameters influencing protein aggregation
Parameters • pH value: pH 6.8-7.4 • Osmolality: 333-533 mOsm/Kg • Agitation: 100-160 rpm • Antifoam: 0.02-0.04% • Valproic Acid: 0-4 mM
Responses • Cell concentration • LDH level • MAb concentration • FDBA assay • Fluorescence Microscopy
Screening using DoE TubeSpin Bioreactors®
• CHO Mock cell line • CHO mAb producing cell line
• Seed 4x105 cells/mL • SFM4CHO medium
10 mL
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 14
Process parameters influencing protein aggregation
CHO Mock cell line Cell concentration
CHO Producer cell line Cell concentration MAb Productivity
Effect of Osmolality Effect of Osm and VPA Effect of Osm and VPA
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 15
Process parameters influencing protein aggregation
CHO Mock cell line - Fluorescence CHO Producer cell line - Fluorescence
Effect of Agitation Effect of Agitation
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 16
Process parameters influencing protein aggregation
CHO Mock cell line – Particle Count CHO Producer cell line – Particle Count
Effect of Agi Effect of Osm Effect of Agi Effect of VPA
Effect of Osm
Effect of VPA on product quality
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 18
Influence of VPA (Valproic acid) • HDAC (histone deacetylase) inhibitor • MAb productivity and aggregate
formation • CHO producer cells • After 120 h cultivation • Protein A and SE-HPLC
• Results Increased specific productivity using 2 mM
VPA VPA dose-dependent formation of mAb
aggregates
[Fischer, Paul et al., Biotechnol Bioeng 2015]
Effect of VPA on mAb aggregation
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 19
SE-HPLC analysis • CHO mAb supernatant (96h) • 0, 72, 96 and 120 h • With 0, 1, 2 or 4 mM VPA Results MAb aggregates in supernatant
increase with incubation time VPA no significant impact in
supernatant Two levels
Cellular level Bioprocess level
[Fischer, Paul et al., Biotechnol Bioeng 2015]
Two differerent levels of aggregate formation
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 20
N-Glycan analysis • CHO mAb cells • 144h cultivation • Biological triplicates • HILIC-analysis
Results VPA also influences N-
Glycan profile Less G1F and G2F More G0F
[Fischer, Paul et al., Biotechnol Bioeng 2015]
VPA - Impact on Glycosylation
w/o VPA 2 mM VPA
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 21
Methods for USP analysis of mAb aggregates Identification of process parameters Agitation and VPA induce aggregate formation Osmolality decreases aggregate formation
Aggregate formation in USP occurs on two levels Cellular level Bioprocess level
VPA: Increased level of aggregates and impaired N-glycosylation
Summary
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 22
Influence of Temperature Influence of Agitation Influence of Osmolality Increase of specific productivity Reduced aggregate formation
Transfer of results on bioreactor cultivation
Outlook
1st June 2015 Albert Paul - 24th ESACT Meeting Slide 23
• Prof. Dr. Friedemann Hesse • Prof. Dr. Boris Mizaikoff
• PhD Eva Herold • Dipl.-Biol. Karen Schwab • M.Sc. Fabian Stiefel • M.Sc. Alina Handl
• Nina Prokoph • Elena Haas • Franziska Schandock • Melanie Leitte • Heidi Schulze • Martin Domnowski • Jörg Zimmermann
• IAB members
Acknowledgements
Thank you for your attention! Questions?