Date post: | 13-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | pankaj-banik |
View: | 78 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
• Herbaceous C3 plant, tetraploid, 48 Chromosomes
• 3rd most important food crop grown in 150 countries
Source: USDA National
Nutrient Database
Drought in potato plants
• Stolon formation & tuberization
– Most sensitive stage
• Longer period in tuber formation
• Decrease in tuber number, growth
& yield
Sensitive
Even a short period
Tuber production & quality
Rationale
• Lots of work in molecular biology
• Little work
–Whole plant physiology
• History
• Acclimation
• Stress & Recovery
–Western Canada
–Short growing season
Stress & Recovery
Survival score
• 0 – vigorous growth
• 1 – Green, 25% leaves
wilted
• 2 – Green, 50% leaves
wilted
• 3 – 75% leaves wilted,
stem bent, lower leaves
changed color
• 4 – All leaves wilted,
some dead, weak stem
• 5 – Plant died
Severe stress (scale 3)
After recovery (scale 0)
Measurements
• Leaf WC
• Stomatal aperture
• Leaf water loss over 15 minutes
• Leaf temperature
• Leaflet water content
• Flowering time
• Stem diameter and plant height
• Biomass
• Trichome Number
• Leaf cuticle layer
• Yield
Contrasting Genotypes
AAFC Potato breeding program, Lethbridge
– Fv12246-6
– V1002-2
– Russet Burbank (RB)
Hypotheses
• Drought stress history of genotypes affects
subsequent drought stress resistance
• Drought acclimation and recovery are key
components of resistance
• Stomatal aperture parameters are associated
with yield under drought stress conditions
Experiment I (V1002)
Generation 1 Generation 2 Generation 3
NA (Non Acclimated)
NA-NA NA-NA-NA
NA-DAS (Drought Acclimated & Stressed)
NA-NA-DAS
NA-NAS (Non Acclimated & Stressed)
NA-NA-NAS
DA (Drought Acclimated)
DA-NA DA-DA-NA
DA-DAS DA-DA-DAS
DA-NAS DA-DA-NAS
Yield (Stress history)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
NA-NA NA-DAS NA-NAS DA-NA DA-DAS DA-NAS
Treatments
Me
an
of
Yie
ld
CB
D
A B C D
A
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
NA-NA
NA-DAS
NA-NAS
DA-NA
DA-DAS
DA-NAS
Trea
tmen
ts
Tuber No.
<5g
5-20g
20-50g
50-100g
>100g
Leaf water loss over 15 min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (min)
% w
ate
r lo
ss
NA-NA-NA
NA-NA-DAS
NA-DAS-NA
NA-DAS-DAS
DA-DAS-NA
DA-DAS-DAS
2
*
1 2
1
LWC at maximum stress
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
NA-NA-NA NA-NA-DAS NA-NA-NAS NA-DAS-NA NA-DAS-DAS NA-DAS-NAS DA-DAS-NA DA-DAS-DAS DA-DAS-NAS
Treatments
% le
af
wa
ter
co
nte
nt
A
A
Experiment II
Genotypes Treatments Codes
Fv12
Non Acclimated (NA) Fv-NA
DAS (Drought Acclimated & Stressed) Fv-DAS
NAS (Non Acclimated & Stressed) Fv-NAS
V1002
NA V-NA
DAS V-DAS
NAS V-NAS
RB
NA RB-NA
DAS RB-DAS
NAS RB-NAS
Treatments Genotypes
Leaf water content
Acclimation
Maximum stress
NA > DAS ***
NA > DAS > NAS *
V > RB > Fv *
V > RB > Fv ***
Leaf water loss over 15 minutes
Acclimation
Recovery
Overall ***
Overall ***, NA > NAS ***
V > Fv ***, V > RB ***
Overall ***, V > RB ***
Leaf Temperature during
Stress
Recovery
NAS>NA***, NAS>DAS*, Overall: *,
NA>DAS*
RB > V *, RB > Fv *
Overall:*, RB~V*
Leaflet water content during
recovery
DAS > NAS * RB > V ***, RB > Fv *, Fv > V *
Leaf Trichome No. Genotype – Treatments interaction: ***
Shoot dry biomass Overall: ***, Fv > V ***, Fv > RB ***
Plant height Oveall: ***, RB > Fv ***, RB > V ***
Stem diameter Overall: ***, Fv > V ***, RB > V ***
Stem Number Overall: ***, Fv > V ***, RB > V ***
***p<0.05, *p close to 0.05
Ongoing & future work
WUE
• Carbon isotope
discrimination
Stomatal aperture
& density Stem water potential (Non
destructive, real time
LICOR-6400
Acknowledgements
• Prof. Karen Tanino
• Dr. Helen Tai, Sustainable Agriculture Environment System (SAGES)
• Prasanto Mondol
• Prof. Sakti Jana
• Eldon Siemens
• Jackie Bantle