Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | shrawan-arya |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 28
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
1/28
STRUCTURESTRUCTURE
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
2/28
rgan za ona es gnrgan za ona es gn
Ma be defined as total attern of or .
structural elements and patterns used tomanage overall org.
1. Bureaucratic Model-
Max weber gave this concept bureaucracys e ne as an org. oun e on alegitimate and formal system of authority.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
3/28
Each or . should have clear divison oflabour and staff.
Hierarchy of position or scalar command.
Rules & procedures to ensure taskaccomplishment.
o c es o personne , promo on an o
security. impersonal manner.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
4/28
Behavioural modelBehavioural model 1. Socio Technical system theory-
Within an or there are 2 s stems
A) social system B)Technical system
The managers must deal effectively with
social needs of the system otherwise theec n ca sys em w no unc on
effectively & efficiently.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
5/28
2. Likerts System 4 organisations
Relationship between org design &effectiveness.
His research dealt with 8 characteristics of
org. Emphasised on supporting relationship,
r uperformance goals.
if they were impersonal and relativelyunim ortant he em hasizes on uni ue valueof each & every member in org.
There is no best way but one best way todesign an org.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
6/28
INTERNATIONAL DIVISIONINTERNATIONAL DIVISION
STRUCTURESTRUCTURE
CEO
- .OPERATIONS
FRANCE CHINA ITALY
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
7/28
e ea o v s on coor na es oractivities.
.
HOD reports directly to CEO.
adopt this pattern.
Even firms with small int. sales limitedgeography, or few executives with int.expertise use this pattern.
Ex Pepsico , BPL, Titan etc
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
8/28
Advantages
Grouping of all activities under one . International focus receives top attention.
A unified approach.
A cadre is established. Disadvantages
Two different camp with divergent
objectives. oca on o resources w en rm grows s
difficult.
product/process in international marketsare iven low riorit .
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
9/28
Global structuralGlobal structural
begin acquiring and allocating resourcebased on international SWOT anal sis. Thisis resorted when strategy changes and
there is a need for structural change.t s n types-
Product.
Function
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
10/28
Global Product DivisionGlobal Product Division A global product division is a structural
given worldwide responsibility for productrou s.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
11/28
INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTINTERNATIONAL PRODUCT
STRUCTURESTRUCTURE
CEO
HOMEOFFICE
MARKETING
PRODUCT COPERATING
PRODUCTION FINANCE HR
DIVISION
FRANCE CHINA ITALY
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
12/28
It operates as a profit centre.
. The marketing and promotion has to be
done carefull .
The manger of division has full autonomyin decision making.
Advantages,
Polycentric orientation is possible. All traditional function can be coordinated
on a product by product basis.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
13/28
Firm use this strategy when a product hasreached maturity stage in home countrybut is in growth stage in others.
Disadvantages
Duplicating resources across divisions.
Second that product managers mayz r r r
short term profit and may ignore long.
Divisional ,managers may be busy inta in local markets then international
as it more convenient and they may haveexperience in that only.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
14/28
Global area divisionGlobal area division This structure is resorted when firms
focus on domestic and internationalmarket with equality.
The global division managers are
responsible for all business operation in.
The top mgt. formulates strategy to.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
15/28
GLOBAL AREA DIVISIONGLOBAL AREA DIVISION
CEO
HOME
OFFICE
FRANCECHINA ITALYOPERATING
DIVISION
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
16/28
s norma y use y org, a are nmature stage & have narrow product line.
across geographical areas.
production, marketing, purchase
integration etc.Thus by manufacturing in this region rather
then by bringing product from somewhere
else the co. is able to produce and sell atlower per unit cost.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
17/28
Cater to local market taste.
Customize the products ex Spicy, sugar in colddrinks,
Disadvantage.-Lack of centralised control.
Increased cost & duplication of resources on aregional basis.
R&D efforts are ignored by divisions as they are
n ma ur y s age. Their focus is not on latest technological
.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
18/28
GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL DIVISION A global functional division organizes
world operations based primarily onfunctions and secondarily on products.
This approach is widely used by extractive
co. v
Functional expertise
. Lean staff.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
19/28
GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL DIVISIONGLOBAL FUNCTIONAL DIVISION
CEO
MANUFACTURI FINANCE MARKETING
PLANT A
GERMANY
PLANT B
CHINAUK US
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
20/28
Disadvanta es Coordination is difficult.
Mana in multi le roducts can be
difficult becoz of separation of production& marketing.
Only CEO is responsible.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
21/28
Mixed StructureMixed Structure A Mixed structure is a hybrid design that
combines structural arrangement in a way
that best suits the enterprise. At times an organization may primarily be
unct ona ut pro uct comm ttees may ecoordinating across certain functions.
.structure but functional managers
assistance and support.
Man or anisations use this structureacross the globe.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
22/28
Advantages-
type of design which satisfies its need .
problem of communication, chain ofcommand etc ma arise, leadin to aconfusion among employees.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
23/28
The Global matrix design is created by
of a functional structure. Members of each ro ect teams are
assigned / selected from functional
departments. Multiple command structure.
Typically in a multinational firm the
r r w r u , r r uproducts or all the products.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
24/28
He matrix structure is found to be
success u un er ma or s ua ons. 1st when org. has few resources.
vast amount of information.
st ,competition may require aggressive
marketing efforts but diversity of firmsproducts calls for uniquely individualizedprogram me.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
25/28
Advanta es- Mgt. has flexibility.
Inter ersonal leadershi skill is fostered.
Specialised skills are utilised. Individual commitment is improved.
Technical and market expertise are
combined. Strength of functional and divisional
structures are combined.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
26/28
Disadvanta es- Decisions are difficult to make.
Communication channels are com licated.
Accountability is difficult to pin point. Power struggle between project &
functional managers.
Employees may be frustrated. Group meetings tend to be time & cost
consuming.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
27/28
It is another org. design which has emerged
economies of scale while also beingres onsive to local customer demand.
This structure combines the elements of
product, functional, geographic designs whilerelying on a network arrangement to link thesubsidiaries.
Di erent pro uct, geograp ic unctiona unitshave different structure depending upon
.
8/11/2019 Org Anisational Design
28/28
Dis ersed units- subsidiaries locatedanywhere which can benefit org.
Either low cost advantage, new
technology information, new consumertrends.
pec a se perat ons- act v t es carr esout by subunits focusing on particular
, , .
Interdependent Relationships-used to
throughout he dispersed units &specialised subunits.