Organic Fertilizer Programs for
Tobacco Seedling Production
M.C. Vann, L.R. Fisher, & R.W. Seagroves
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
North Carolina State University
M.S. McGinnis
North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services-Agronomic Division
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Presentation Outline
• Organic Seedling Production
• Production Concerns
• Methods & Materials
• Results & Discussion
• Conclusions
• Questions
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Organic Seedling Production
• Production occurs in a float system
– Nutrients are added directly to the water
– OMRI listed soilless media sources
• Common Nutrient Sources:
– Allganic Sodium Nitrate (16-0-0 or 15-0-2)
– Peruvian Seabird Guano
– Bat Guano
– Allganic Potassium Sulfate (0-0-52)
– Acetic acid for bicarbonate adjustments
– Micronutrient sources vary depending upon need
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Organic Seedling Production Concerns
• Variable N composition of nutrient sources
– Sodium Nitrate: 0% Urea, 0% NH4+, 100% NO3
-
– Seabird Guano: 69% Urea, 30% NH4+, 0.65% NO3
-
– 16-5-16: 0% Urea, 37.5% NH4+, 62.5% NO3
-
• Variable rate of N mineralization
– Aerobic vs. Anaerobic conditions • (field vs. float bed)
• Difficult to dissolve guano in solution
• High bicarbonate concentration – ≥2.0 meq HCO3
-/L (>200 mg/L) can stunt seedlings (2,4)
• High P concentration – “leggy”/“spindly” seedling characteristics (3)
• High Na concentration – <70 mg Na/L is recommended (4)
• High Urea and NH4+ concentration (5)
– Excessive NO2- is toxic to seedlings
– Low microbial populations for oxidation in media
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Objectives
1. Identify organic fertilizer programs best suited for seedling
production
2. Identify potential concerns associated with those programs
3. Further develop Extension recommendations
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Methods & Materials
Treatment List
1. Guano
2. Guano + Gypsum
3. Sodium Nitrate
4. Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
5. Guano + Sodium Nitrate
6. Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
7. 16-5-16 (conventional control)
Experimental Design
• Central Crops Research Station
– June-July 2016
– November 2016-January 2017
• RCBD, 3 replications per evaluation
• 6 trays per bed
– 100 designated cells/tray for data collection
– 12.7 cm float water depth
– Fertilizer added 9 and 21 DAS
• Variety: K326 (Rickard Seed Co.)
• Media: Carolina Choice All Natural Mix
• Data analyzed using PROC Mixed in SAS
ver. 9.4
• Figures created using Sigma Plot ver. 12
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Table 1. Organic fertilizer programs evaluated and the respective targeted nutritional content.
Fertilizer Programa,b,c Total N P2O5 K2O Ca
__________________________________________________mg L-1__________________________________________________
Guano 125 115 20 (SG) + 105 (0-0-52) --
Guano + Gypsum 125 115 20 (SG) + 105 (0-0-52) 50
Sodium Nitrate 125 0 125 (0-0-52) --
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum 125 0 125 (0-0-52) 50
Guano + Sodium Nitrate 44 (SG) + 81 (SN) 40 7 (SG) + 118 (0-0-52) --
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum 44 (SG) + 81 (SN) 40 7 (SG) + 118 (0-0-52) 50
16-5-16 125 40 125 --
a Guano (SG), Sunleaves 12-11-2 Peruvian Seabird Guano; Sodium Nitrate (SN), SQM Allganic 16-0-0; 16-5-16, SQM Ultrasol Premium; 0-0-52, SQM Allganic Potassium Sulfate b Fertilizer program applied twice per season, 9 and 21 days after seeding c Nutrient content calculated based upon manufacturers reported analysis
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Data Collection
• Dissolved Oxygen: – YSI DO Meter
– 5 day intervals prior to solution collection and water addition
• Solution Samples: – Source Water
– 5 day intervals
– 474 mL solution volume
– After beds filled to 12.7 cm depth
– Samples analyzed by NCDA&CS
• Media Samples: – 20 DAS and at conclusion of study
– 10 cells/tray/treatment • N=60/treatment/replication
– Samples analyzed by NCDA&CS
• Seedling Measurements: – Total plants, usable plants, stem
height, & stem diameter
– Conclusion of study
– 10 cells/tray/treatment • N=60/treatment/replication
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Table 2. Nutrient concentration, pH, and bicarbonate concentration of source water and soilless media
prior to seedinga. Measurements are expressed in mg L-1 unless otherwise noted.
Nutrient Environment One Environment Two
Solution Media Solution Media
Total Nmin 3.96 9.03 4.12 45.68
NH4+-N 0.55 3.30 0.51 1.20
NO3--N 3.41 5.73 3.61 44.50
Urea-N 0.54 0.25 0.16 0.00
P 0.09 0.13 0.09 0.10
K 1.92 23.35 2.11 74.73
Ca 3.50 60.93 4.11 88.98
pH 6.12 4.52 6.21 4.37
HCO3- (meq L-1) 0.30 -- 0.38 --
a Soilless media and source water solution samples analyzed by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services-Agronomic Division, Raleigh, NC
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
DO
Con
cen
trati
on
(m
g D
O L
-1)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Guano
Guano + Gypsum
Sodium Nitrate
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
Guano + Sodium Nitrate
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
16-5-16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Days After Seeding
Environment One Environment Two
Figure 1. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in float water solution as influenced by
seedling fertility program. Data are presented for each growing environment.
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250Guano
Guano + Gypsum
Sodium Nitrate
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
Guano + Sodium Nitrate
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
16-5-16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Am
mon
ium
-N C
on
cen
trati
on
(m
g N
H4
+ L
-1)
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Days After Seeding
Environment One Environment Two
Figure 2. Ammonium-nitrogen concentration in float water solution as influenced by seedling
fertility program. Data are presented for each growing environment.
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Nit
rate
-N C
on
cen
trati
on
(N
O3
- L-1
)
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250Guano
Guano + Gypsum
Sodium Nitrate
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
Guano + Sodium Nitrate
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
16-5-16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Days After Seeding
Environment One Environment Two
Figure 3. Nitrate-nitrogen concentration in float water solution as influenced by seedling
fertility program. Data are presented for each growing environment.
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
pH
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
Guano
Guano + Gypsum
Sodium Nitrate
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
Guano + Sodium Nitrate
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
16-5-16
Days After Seeding
Environment One Environment Two
Figure 4. Float water solution pH as influenced by seedling fertility program. Data are
presented for each growing environment.
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Bic
arb
on
ate
Con
cen
trati
on
(m
eq H
CO
3
- L-1
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16Guano
Guano + Gypsum
Sodium Nitrate
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
Guano + Sodium Nitrate
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum
16-5-16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Days After Seeding
Environment One Environment Two
Figure 5. Bicarbonate concentration in float water solution as influenced by seedling fertility
program. Data are presented for each growing environment. Dashed line represents 2.0 meq
threshold.
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
NH
4
+ o
r N
O3
- Con
cen
trati
on
(m
g L
-1)
0
50
100
150
200
250
pH
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
NH4
+-N
NO3
--N
pH
Days After Seeding
Figure 6. Ammonium, nitrate, and float water pH as influenced by guano application. Data are
presented for each growing environment.
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
NH
4
+ o
r N
O3
- Concentr
ati
on (
mg L
-1)
0
50
100
150
200
250
pH
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0 2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Additional Solution Observations
• Urea-N concentration:
– Guano > Guano + Sodium Nitrate > Sodium Nitrate ≥ 16-5-16
– Maximum of 20-25 mg/L, decreased over time
• P concentration:
– Guano > 16-5-16 > Guano + Sodium Nitrate > Sodium Nitrate
– Maximum of 40-50 mg/L in Guano only treatment
– <1.0 mg/L observed in Sodium Nitrate only treatment
• Na concentration:
– Sodium Nitrate > Guano + Sodium Nitrate > Guano > 16-5-16
– >350 mg/L observed in Sodium Nitrate only treatment
– High Na did not impact seedling growth, Coggins (4) did not observe injury at 580 mg/L
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Soilless Media Nutrition
• Similar trends to nutrient concentration in float water solution
– Guano based treatments had highest NH4+ concentration
– High NO3- concentration where sodium nitrate was exclusive N source
– NO3- concentration increased from the 20 DAS sampling to the conclusion of the study
• NH4+ concentration decreased
– Low P (<1.0 mg/kg) concentration when Sodium Nitrate was the only N source
• Soluble salts (SS) concentration highest when Sodium Nitrate was included in
fertility program.
– SS injury was not observed in either environment
– Delayed and split fertilizer application was likely beneficial
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Table 3. Total transplants, usable transplants, transplant height, and transplant diameter reported by corresponding treatment as affected by
fertility programsa,b.
Treatment Listc Total Plants Usable Plants Stem Diameter Stem Height
---------------%--------------- mm plant-1 cm plant-1
Guano 90 a 78 c 2.76 b 5.62 b
Guano + Gypsum 91 a 79 bc 2.84 b 6.08 ab
Sodium Nitrate -- -- -- --
Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum -- -- -- --
Guano + Sodium Nitrate 91 a 85 ab 3.48 a 6.27 ab
Guano + Sodium Nitrate + Gypsum 93 a 86 a 3.43 a 6.47 ab
16-5-16 88 a 79 bc 3.30 a 6.62 a aTreatment means followed by the same letter within the same column are not significant at the α=0.05 level. Data are pooled across two environments.
bTreatments comprised of Sodium Nitrate only removed from analysis
c Guano, Sunleaves 12-11-2 Peruvian Seabird Guano; Sodium Nitrate, SQM Allganic 16-0-0; 16-5-16, SQM Ultrasol Premium
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
16-5-16
SG + 0-0-52
16-0-0 + 0-0-52
SG + 16-0-0 + 0-0-52
16-0-0 + 0-0-52 + Gypsum SG+ 0-0-52 + Gypsum
SG + 16-0-0 + 0-0-52 + Gypsum
SG, Seabird Guano
16-0-0, Sodium Nitrate
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Guano + 16-0-0 + 0-0-52
16-5-16 Guano + 0-0-52 + Gypsum
Guano + 0-0-52
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Conclusions • 5 of 7 treatments produced acceptable transplants
– Treatments absent of P did not produce usable transplants (Sodium Nitrate only)
– Supplemental P is required, not enough in source water or media
• Organic “blend” treatment was best treatment. – Guano + Sodium Nitrate + 0-0-52 (+ Gypsum)
– Produced highest number of usable transplants
– Balanced ammonium:nitrate ratio (1:2 or 1:3)
– HCO3- concentration is more favorable for seedling growth
• Identified Guano as a source of HCO3-
– Delayed/split fertilizer application may reduce HCO3- stunting
– Low media pH buffers against significant pH increase from HCO3-
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Grower Recommendations
Fertilizer Programs
• Program One:
• Seabird Guano (13.9 oz./100 gal) – 104 g 12-11-2/100 L H2O
• 0-0-52 (2.7-3.2 oz./100 gal) – 20-24 g/100 L H2O
• Program Two:
• Seabird Guano (4.9 oz/100 gal) – 37 g 12-11-2/100 L H2O
• Sodium Nitrate (6.8 oz/100 gal) – 51 g 16-0-0/100 L H2O
• 0-0-52 (3.0 oz/100 gal) – 20-24 g/100 L H2O
Considerations
• Reduce guano particle size
• Soak guano in hot water for 24 hours
• Fertilize in split applications
– 9 and 21 DAS
• Target 125 mg N/L
• Target 40 mg P/L
• Target 125 mg K/L
• Apply Ca, Mg, S, and B as needed
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
References
1. USDA-NASS. 2016. Certified Organic Survey-2015 Summary. Accessed September 25,
2017. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/OrganicProduction//2010s/2016/
OrganicProduction-09-15-2016.pdf
2. NCDA&CS. 2013. Solution Analysis for Tobacco Transplant Float Beds. Accessed
September 25, 2017. http://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/floatbed.pdf
3. Fisher, LR and MC Vann. 2017. Producing Healthy Transplants in a Float System. In: LR
Fisher, editor, 2017 North Carolina State University Flue-Cured Tobacco Production Guide
(AG-187 (Revised)). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. p. 44-57.
4. Coggins, TE. 1993. Effect of Sodium and Bicarbonate on Tobacco Seedling Production in
the Greenhouse Float System [thesis]. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. p. 129.
5. Pearce, RC, Y Zhan, and MS Coyne. 1998. Nitrogen Transformations in the Tobacco Float
System. Tobacco Science 42(4):82-88.
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Acknowledgements
• Technical Assistance
– Rick Seagroves
– Scott Whitley
– Hunter Mason
– Michelle McGinnis
– NCDA&CS
• Material Donation
– SQM
– Carolina Soil Company
– Rickard Seed Company
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A
Questions??
Matthew C. Vann: [email protected]
Website: tobacco.ces.ncsu.edu
North Carolina Tobacco Information
@NCSUtobacco
@ncsu_tobacco
2017
_AP
19_V
ann.
AP
2017
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
by
CO
RE
ST
A