+ All Categories
Home > Education > Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

Date post: 07-May-2015
Category:
Upload: saboor-hussain
View: 722 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
21
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Understanding Work Teams Chapter TEN
Transcript
Page 1: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Understanding Work Teams

Chapter TEN

Page 2: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Why Have Teams Become So Popular?Why Have Teams Become So Popular?

Teams typically outperform individuals.

Teams use employee talents better.

Teams are more flexible and responsive to changes in the environment.

Teams facilitate employee involvement.

Teams are an effective way to democratize an organization and increase motivation.

Page 3: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Team Versus Group: What’s the Difference?Team Versus Group: What’s the Difference?

Work Group

A group that interacts primarily to share information and to make decisions to help each group member perform within his or her area of responsibility.Work Team

A group whose individual efforts result in a performance that is greater than the sum of the individual inputs.

Page 4: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Comparing Work Groups and Work TeamsComparing Work Groups and Work Teams

E X H I B I T 10–1E X H I B I T 10–1

Page 5: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Types of TeamsTypes of Teams

Problem-Solving Teams

Groups of 5 to 12 employees from the same department who meet for a few hours each week to discuss ways of improving quality, efficiency, and the work environment.Self-Managed Work Teams

Groups of 10 to 15 people who take on the responsibilities of their former supervisors.

Page 6: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Types of Teams (cont’d)Types of Teams (cont’d)

•Task forces

•Committees

Cross-Functional Teams

Employees from about the same hierarchical level, but from different work areas, who come together to accomplish a task.

Page 7: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Types of Teams (cont’d)Types of Teams (cont’d)

Characteristics of Virtual Teams

1. The absence of paraverbal and nonverbal cues

2. A limited social context

3. The ability to overcome time and space constraints

Characteristics of Virtual Teams

1. The absence of paraverbal and nonverbal cues

2. A limited social context

3. The ability to overcome time and space constraints

Virtual Teams

Teams that use computer technology to tie together physically dispersed members in order to achieve a common goal.

Page 8: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

A Team-Effectiveness

Model

A Team-Effectiveness

Model

E X H I B I T 10–3E X H I B I T 10–3

Page 9: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Creating Effective TeamsCreating Effective Teams

Page 10: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)

Page 11: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Key Roles of Teams

Key Roles of Teams

E X H I B I T 10–4E X H I B I T 10–4

Page 12: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)

Page 13: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)

Page 14: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Effects of Group ProcessesEffects of Group Processes

+

MINUS

=

E X H I B I T 10–5E X H I B I T 10–5

Goal: Maximize Process Gains While Minimizing Process Losses!

Page 15: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Creating Effective Teams: DiversityCreating Effective Teams: Diversity

Group Demography

The degree to which members of a group share a common demographic attribute, such as age, sex, race, educational level, or length of service in the organization, and the impact of this attribute on turnover.

Cohorts

Individuals who, as part of a group, hold a common attribute.

Page 16: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Turning Individuals Into Team PlayersTurning Individuals Into Team Players

The Challenges

– Overcoming individual resistance to team membership.

– Countering the influence of individualistic cultures.

– Introducing teams in an organization that has historically valued individual achievement.

Shaping Team Players

– Selecting employees who can fulfill their team roles.

– Training employees to become team players.

– Reworking the reward system to encourage cooperative efforts while continuing to recognize individual contributions.

Page 17: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Teams and Quality ManagementTeams and Quality Management

Team Effectiveness and Quality Management Requires That Teams:

1. Are small enough to be efficient and effective.

2. Are properly trained in required skills.

3. Allocated enough time to work on problems.

4. Are given authority to resolve problems and take corrective action.

5. Have a designated “champion” to call on when needed.

Page 18: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Beware: Teams Aren’t Always the AnswerBeware: Teams Aren’t Always the Answer

Three tests to see if a team fits the situation:

– Is the work complex and is there a need for different perspectives?

– Does the work create a common purpose or set of goals for the group that is larger than the aggregate of the goals for individuals?

– Are members of the group involved in interdependent tasks?

Page 19: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

What kinds of things have you experienced in

a team setting that could be considered as

process loss? Choose two and write them

down.

Chapter Check-Up: Teams

Possibilities include: Too much socializing, coordinating work flow, lag time in responses to emails, personality conflicts, attendance and timeliness problems, etc.

Page 20: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

If you were asked to choose people from your class right now to make up a team for a class project, list five individuals you would choose.

Chapter Check-Up: Teams

Now that you have your list, consider what the composition of your team would look like. How much diversity would there be? Given what we learned in this chapter, what would the pros and cons of your

composition be?

Page 21: Organizational behaviour chapter 10 Stephen P. Robins

© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Is conflict in a team good or bad? Discuss.

Chapter Check-Up: Teams

Conflict can be both good and bad. Task conflict is beneficial for a team because it helps protect against groupthink. Relationship conflict is bad for a team’s

morale.

What, specifically, can you do to create task conflict in a group? Think about the reality of trying to “stir the pot”… and write down a phrase you could say (e.g., you would feel comfortable saying to your peers) to

create task conflict.


Recommended