+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk...

ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk...

Date post: 04-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 10 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
8
AROT TNI TI-fE WORLD A Gordian Knot: The Ethnic Relations of the South Slays It is likely that the violent war now raging between the south Slavic peoples will be included among the most tragic of the twentieth century. The roots of the animosity extend far into the past. While a solution to today’s horrors will have to address the complicated interactions of history, the participants themselves must step outside their attachment to the past and attack the problem from new perspectives. Old Wine, New Bottles * Of Christianity and Empire: the Early History of the South Slays * Under Austria and the Ottomans: Conquest, Migrations, Conversion to Islam * The 19th Century: Intellectuals Debate Nationality * Coming Together, Breaking Apart: Yugosiavism, Greater Serbdom, Croatian Separatism * The Siovenes and Macedonians * The First Yugoslavia Is Born, 1918 * Circus Democracy and a Police State: Yugoslavia During the Interwar Period * World War II: Yugoslavia Shattered, Genocide and Resistance * Tito Tries to Solve the National Question * Tito Steps In * The Succession: From Tito’s Death to Today. Books, Gitanes and CDs By Nicholas Breyfogle Old Wine, New Bottles We lived in peace for 50 years. We were neighbors, friends-Yugoslavians. I grew up never hearing eth nic hatred or plans for war. I loved summers in Sara jevo, when everyone would walk along the main street in the evening, stopping at cafés filled with friends and happy laughter. My friends were normal teenagers. We wanted to have fun, go to movies and parties and shop. We didn’t choose friends based on whether we were Serbs, Croats or Muslims. Newsweek, March 8, 1993 S o wrote Naida Zecevic, an eighteen year old Bosnian, now a first year student attending college in the USA and a de facto refugee, exiled by the course of events from her family in Saraje vo. Her description fits well with past images of Yugoslavia as a tourist destination replete with startling mountains, lush coastal resorts, and a warm, inviting population who extended hospitali ty in old European style. Yet, they are strange words to be read ing these days. Hardly a day goes by without some’ further unfolding of the wars that rage between the people of Yugoslavia’s successor states. These wars now account for the most terrible fighting Europe has seen since the end of the Sec ond World War-some 50,000 to 150,000 dead, anywhere between two and three million displaced persons, institutional ized policies of rape, and the habitual assortment of torture, slaughter, imprisonment, deprivation, and starvation. It is a war without boundaries in which the line between civilian and sol dier, in the true Balkan tradition of brigandage and guerilla war fare, is so blurred and besmirched that it all too often disappears. The ethnic relations of the south Slays are like the mythical Gordian knot. For hundreds of years they have struggled to untangle the intertwining chords, proposing different solutions at various times. Recently, however, the solution of choice has become, not for the first time in their history, the forcible separa tion of the knot by violently hacking the bonds that tie, splitting chords and spraying rope dust. Throughout their tangled history, the south Slavic people who came to make up what the twentieth century has known as Yugoslavia have struggled with the forces of history. Their memories reach back to an almost inconceivable degree, to Empires and religious conversion a thousand years ago. They relive their history in the conflicts of today, in stories, political speeches, and radio and television. Each new step is justified by a past step, each claim by a past claim, and each victimization by a past victimization. History has brought them together but it has also torn them apart-sometimes with violence, sometimes with words. Today, the south Slays continue to struggle with their past- with religions, with ethnicity, with medieval empires, with the scars and changes made by the Ottoman and Hapsburg Empires, with diaspora, with the impact of western notions of nationalism, with the violent breakup of those Empires, with the hungry "Great Powers" who stood at their doors to gobble up the scraps, with different conceptions of the unity of Yugoslavia, and with the approximately eighty years that they lived together under one roof, often squabbling like the members of a family. It was a family, but perhaps only one of convenience-never the best, only the better, solution. When the external threat of conquest disappeared and the economy disintegrated in the late 1980s, the family began to break up-each member now striving to take with them as many of the family possessions, and, in fact, as many of the other family members, as possible. After centuries, the longstanding questions still remain to be answered. Who shall control the lands of Bosnia and Hercegov ma? Will it be the Croats or the Serbs who lead the south Slays? How are national boundaries defined-by ethnicity or historic precedent, by religion or by language? Who are the south Slays, one group or many? Who are the Bosnians? Are they all Serbs or all Croats? Will it be a federal or central political structure? Who will decide? With all this history, the south Slays are caught in a paradox. On one hand, lasting solutions to the struggle will inevitably ORIGINS MAY1993
Transcript
Page 1: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

AROTTNITI-fEWORLD

AGordianKnot:TheEthnicRelationsoftheSouthSlays

ItislikelythattheviolentwarnowragingbetweenthesouthSlavicpeopleswillbeincludedamongthemosttragicofthetwentiethcentury.Therootsoftheanimosityextendfarintothepast.Whileasolutiontotoday’shorrorswillhavetoaddressthecomplicatedinteractionsofhistory,theparticipantsthemselvesmuststepoutsidetheirattachmenttothepastandattacktheproblemfromnewperspectives.

OldWine,NewBottles*OfChristianityandEmpire:theEarlyHistoryoftheSouthSlays*UnderAustriaandtheOttomans:Conquest,Migrations,ConversiontoIslam*The19thCentury:IntellectualsDebateNationality*ComingTogether,BreakingApart:Yugosiavism,GreaterSerbdom,CroatianSeparatism*TheSiovenesandMacedonians*TheFirstYugoslaviaIsBorn,1918*CircusDemocracyandaPoliceState:YugoslaviaDuringtheInterwarPeriod*WorldWarII:YugoslaviaShattered,GenocideandResistance*TitoTriestoSolvetheNationalQuestion*TitoStepsIn*TheSuccession:FromTito’sDeathtoToday.Books,GitanesandCDs

ByNicholasBreyfogle

OldWine,NewBottlesWelivedinpeacefor50years.Wewereneighbors,friends-Yugoslavians.Igrewupneverhearingethnichatredorplansforwar.IlovedsummersinSarajevo,wheneveryonewouldwalkalongthemainstreetintheevening,stoppingatcafésfilledwithfriendsandhappylaughter.Myfriendswerenormalteenagers.Wewantedtohavefun,gotomoviesandpartiesandshop.Wedidn’tchoosefriendsbasedonwhetherwewereSerbs,CroatsorMuslims.Newsweek,March8,1993

SowroteNaidaZecevic,aneighteenyearoldBosnian,nowafirstyearstudentattendingcollegeintheUSAandadefacto

refugee,exiledbythecourseofeventsfromherfamilyinSarajevo.HerdescriptionfitswellwithpastimagesofYugoslaviaasatouristdestinationrepletewithstartlingmountains,lushcoastalresorts,andawarm,invitingpopulationwhoextendedhospitalityinoldEuropeanstyle.Yet,theyarestrangewordstobereadingthesedays.Hardlyadaygoesbywithoutsome’furtherunfoldingofthewarsthatragebetweenthepeopleofYugoslavia’ssuccessorstates.ThesewarsnowaccountforthemostterriblefightingEuropehasseensincetheendoftheSecondWorldWar-some50,000to150,000dead,anywherebetweentwoandthreemilliondisplacedpersons,institutionalizedpoliciesofrape,andthehabitualassortmentoftorture,slaughter,imprisonment,deprivation,andstarvation.Itisawarwithoutboundariesinwhichthelinebetweencivilianandsoldier,inthetrueBalkantraditionofbrigandageandguerillawarfare,issoblurredandbesmirchedthatitalltoooftendisappears.

TheethnicrelationsofthesouthSlaysarelikethemythicalGordianknot.Forhundredsofyearstheyhavestruggledtountangletheintertwiningchords,proposingdifferentsolutionsatvarioustimes.Recently,however,thesolutionofchoicehasbecome,notforthefirsttimeintheirhistory,theforcibleseparationoftheknotbyviolentlyhackingthebondsthattie,splitting

chordsandsprayingropedust.Throughouttheirtangledhistory,thesouthSlavicpeople

whocametomakeupwhatthetwentiethcenturyhasknownasYugoslaviahavestruggledwiththeforcesofhistory.Theirmemoriesreachbacktoanalmostinconceivabledegree,toEmpiresandreligiousconversionathousandyearsago.Theyrelivetheirhistoryintheconflictsoftoday,instories,politicalspeeches,andradioandtelevision.Eachnewstepisjustifiedbyapaststep,eachclaimbyapastclaim,andeachvictimizationbyapastvictimization.Historyhasbroughtthemtogetherbutithasalsotornthemapart-sometimeswithviolence,sometimeswithwords.

Today,thesouthSlayscontinuetostrugglewiththeirpast-withreligions,withethnicity,withmedievalempires,withthescarsandchangesmadebytheOttomanandHapsburgEmpires,withdiaspora,withtheimpactofwesternnotionsofnationalism,withtheviolentbreakupofthoseEmpires,withthehungry"GreatPowers"whostoodattheirdoorstogobbleupthescraps,withdifferentconceptionsoftheunityofYugoslavia,andwiththeapproximatelyeightyyearsthattheylivedtogetherunderoneroof,oftensquabblinglikethemembersofafamily.Itwasafamily,butperhapsonlyoneofconvenience-neverthebest,onlythebetter,solution.Whentheexternalthreatofconquestdisappearedandtheeconomydisintegratedinthelate1980s,thefamilybegantobreakup-eachmembernowstrivingtotakewiththemasmanyofthefamilypossessions,and,infact,asmanyoftheotherfamilymembers,aspossible.

Aftercenturies,thelongstandingquestionsstillremaintobeanswered.WhoshallcontrolthelandsofBosniaandHercegovma?WillitbetheCroatsortheSerbswholeadthesouthSlays?Howarenationalboundariesdefined-byethnicityorhistoricprecedent,byreligionorbylanguage?WhoarethesouthSlays,onegroupormany?WhoaretheBosnians?AretheyallSerbsorallCroats?Willitbeafederalorcentralpoliticalstructure?Whowilldecide?

Withallthishistory,thesouthSlaysarecaughtinaparadox.Ononehand,lastingsolutionstothestrugglewillinevitably

ORIGINSMAY1993

Page 2: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

havetocometotermswiththecauses-causeswhoseoriginsliedeeplyentrenchedinthepast.Ontheotherhand,today’sparticipantsmustescapethatverysamehistory-mustbreakthebondsthatcondemnthemtorelivethepast-sothattheymayaddressthecontemporarysituationwithclearandrationalminds.

OfChristianityandEmpire:TheEarlyHistoryoftheSouthSlaysTheSlavicpeopleswhonowinhabitthemajorityoftheBalkanpeninsulamigratedtotheirnewhomelandduringthe6thand7thcenturiesandsoonthereafterconvertedtoChristianity.Thoseinthewest-theSlaysofmoderndayCroatia,Slovenia-wereconvertedbyGermanspeakingRomanCatholics,thoseintheeast-‘Serbia,Montenegro,Macedonia-byEasternOrthodoxChristians.WiththeschismthattoretheRomanandEasternchurchesapartin1054,thesouthSlayswerepermanentlyseparatedonefromtheother.BosniaandHercegovina,situatedonthedividinglinebetweentheRomanCatholicandtheEasternOrthodox,wereconvertedbybothandwerealreadyaboneofcontentionbetweenthetwosides.

DuringMedievalhistory,thesouthSlavlandsdevelopedtwoimportantempires-onecenteredonCroatia,theotheronSerbia.Eachempireexpandedtocontrollandsthattodayfallunderthejurisdictionofothernationalities.TheCroatiankingdom,whichincludedpartsofwhatistodayBosnia,beganin924andlastedforclosetotwohundredyears.TheSerbianpeoplesdevelopedandmaintainedthestrongestofthesouthSlavmedievalkingdoms,unitingthepeoplesofMontenegro,Hercegovina,andSerbia.ThekingdomreacheditsapexduringthereignofStepanDusan1331-1355whoexpandedtheborderstoincludeallofmodemAlbania,MacedoniawhereDusanlocatedhiscapitalcity,Skopje,partsofBosnia,aswellasagoodportionofGreece.In1389,theSerbarmywasdefeatedbytheTurksatKosovoPolje-abattlethathastakenonamysticalimportancefortheSerbianpeopleandwhichliesattheheartoftheSerbiandeterminationtoholdKosovo.

UnderAustriaandtheOttomans14thto19thCenturies:Conquest-MigratIons--ConversIontoIslamToday,pocketsofethnicSerbsarefoundspreadthroughoutformerYugoslavlands-inCroatia,inBosniaaiidHercegovina,inKosovo,inVojvodina.ThisdiasporaoriginatedwiththemassmigrationswestwardthatfollowedinthewakeoftheOttomanTurkishMuslimsinvasions.Themasstransfercontinuedinfitsandstartsoverthecourseofthefollowingcenturies.ItbroughtCroatandSerbtogethertolivesidebysideand,overgenerations,theybegantodevelopsimilarcustoms,traditions,andlanguage.

OttomanruleenhancedthepoweroftheSerbianOrthodoxChurchandreligiousleaderstookonnewroles.TheOrthodoxChurchquicklybecamethevesselinwhichSerbiantraditionandnationalconsciousnesswasfosteredandtransportedthroughtheages.Moreover,theOrthodoxchurchactedtobindOttomanSerbswiththeotherSerbsspreadthroughouttheHapsburgEmpire.

OttomanruleservedtodistanceitssubjectsfromthedevelopmentsintheWest.Thebureaucratic,administrative,feudalstructureofOttomanruleremainedvirtuallyunalteredbycapitalismandthedevelopmentofnewclasses.Theconsequencehasbeenapermanenteconomiclagonthepartoftheeasternsouth

Slays.ThefinalimportantresultoftheOttomanconquestwasthe

conversionofasignificantpartofthepopulationtoIslam.ThegreatestincidenceofvoluntaryconversiontookplaceinBosniaandHercegovina.ManyBosniansandHercegovinianshadcometoadheretothebreakawayBogomilChristiansect.TheywelcomedthecomingoftheMuslims,onlytoohappytoescapethepersecutionoftheirChristianbrothers.Tothisday,BosnianMuslimsareresentedbytheothersouthSlaysasTurkishcollaboratorsandtraitors.

ThoseYugoslavswhofellunderHapsburgcontrol-Slovenes,Croats,Serbs-underwentaverydifferentseriesofchangesanddevelopmentsthantheircousinsunderOttomandominion-changesthathavelefttheirmarktothepresent.TheHapsburgSlayswereexposedtoGermancultureandtheforcesofevolvingcapitalism.Administratively,theHapsburgSlaysmaintainedtraditionalgoverningstructuresthroughtheinstitutionofthesabor-agoverningassembly-andtheban-agovernor.UnliketheOttomanSlavrelianceonthechurch,theCroatsandSlovenesreliedonthesepoliticalstructuresasnationalrallyingpointsandfortheupholdingoftradition.

TheNIneteenthCentury:IntellectualsDebateNationality

Duringthebeginningofthenineteenthcentury,theconceptsofnationalityandnationthathaddevelopedfromeighteenthcenturywesternEuropeanromanticismweretakenupandappliedbysouthSlavicintellectuals.Language,morethanreligion,custom,orevenethnicitywasconsideredtobetheallimportantfoundationofnationality.

InSerbia,VukKaradzicstandardizedtheSerbianlanguagearoundthe"stokavian"vernaculardialect.ThisacthadasignificanteffectonSerbian-Croatianrelations.ThemajorityoftheCroatsalsospokeinthestokaviandialect-apotentiallyunifying

LjutJijana,_._‘Zagreb

CROATIA

K’jinaRgio

POLITICALMAPOFFORMERYUGOSLAVIA-VojvodinaandKosovowereautonomousregionswithinSerbia,theothercountrieswerefullrepublics.[Electromap,Inc.]

MAYfl3ORIGINS.3

Page 3: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

forceandbasisforanationstate.However,thelinguisticissuealsoservedtodividetheCroatsfromtheSerbs.Karadzicarguedinanarticle"SerbsAllandEverywhere"thatallpeoplewhospokestokavianwereinfactSerbs-aninterpretationthatdeniedtheexistenceofCroatswhospokeinthatdialect.TheargumentquicklyledtotheinterpretationthatalllandsinwhichthepopulationspokestokavianshouldbelongtoSerbia.ManyCroatsarguedinasimilarfashion,everyonewasCroatian.

TheselinguisticdebatestookplaceinthebackdropofapanYugoslavideologythatdevelopedinCroatiaatthesametime-Illyrianism,namedfortheRomanprovinceofIllyriathatcoveredthelandonwhichthesouthSlavstateslaterdeveloped.AdherentstotheIllyrianviewassertedthatallBalkanSlaysweredescendentsofthesametribecalledthe"Illyrians"andwereethnicallyunited.DistinctionsbetweentheIllyrianpeopleexistedbecauseoftheyearsofforeignrule.TheIllyrianscouldandshoulduniteinthefuture.

ComingTogether,BreakingApartYugoslavlsm-GreaterSerbdom-CroatlanSeparatismFromthel850s,movementtowardssouthSlavunityaccelerated.Nevertheless,"Yugoslavism"alwaystookabackseattothestrongerandmorequicklydevelopingsenseofindividualnationalidentities.In1866-67,secretmeetingstookplacebetweentherepresentativesoftheCroatianassemblyandtheSerbianforeignministry.Ageneralagreementwasreachedforthe"formationofaYugoslavstateindependentofAustriaandTurkey."However,almostimmediatelyitbecameclearthatdisagreementsexisted

4.ORIGINS.MAY1993

onmostofthespecificproposalsforunification.AttheheartofthedisagreementlaytwoquestionswhichhavecontinuedtothepresentdaytoplaguesouthSlavleaders-WhowouldassumethemantleofleadershipintheunificationoftheYugoslavs?and,related,butequallyasimportant,HowwouldthelandsthatmadeuptheterritoriesofBosniaandHercegovinabedisposedofwithinanyfutureYugoslavnation?

SerbiabecamethefirstsouthSlavstatetogainitsautonomyfromtheOttomansorAustrianswiththeestablishmentofanindependentmonarchyin1878.Theroadtofreedomhadbegunasearlyas1804andfollowedatorturedpathofpeasantrebellionsandexternalmeddlingthatleftmanydeadandthefinalSerbianstatefrustratedbytheinterferenceoftheGreatPowers.

WithintheCroatianpoliticalspectrum,threepartiesemergedduringthemid-I800s,eachwithaslightlydifferentpolicyontheissueofnationality.TheUnionistpartybelievedthatCroatia’sbestinterestslayinmaintaininghistorictieswithHungaryandwasanti-Serb,anti-Orthodox,andanti-Yugoslav.TheNationalPartyespousedtheIllyrianidea,believinginthepan-SlavicvisionbutbasedaroundaCroatiannucleus.ThePartyof[CroatState]RightledbyAnteStarcevicstoodforanindependentCroatia.Starcevicarguedthat"theentirepopulationbetweenMacedoniaand[German-speakingAustrianareas],betweentheDanubeandtheAdriaticSea,hasonlyonenationality,onehomeland,oneCroatianbeing."

Twoeventsduringthe1870sservedtorapidlydistancethesouthSlavgroupsfromoneanother.First,aneducationallawwaspassedin1874inCroatiawhosemissionwastosecularizeeducation,shiftingcontrolfromthechurchestothesaborand,thereby,tofosterasenseof"Croatness"amongallSlavicpeo

plesinCroatia.TheOrthodoxSerbianpopulationunderthe

Monarchyresistedthislegalactionanddemandedthattheybeexemptedfromthelaw.ThatthelawwaspassedrankledSer

biancitizens.ThattheOrthodoxcalledforanexemption,stifllulatedsuspicionsamongnationalistCroatleaders.

Second,theBalkansfoundthemselvesincrisisfrom1875

78whichbeganwithanuprisingintheOttomanprovincesof

BosniaandHercegovina.AttheinternationalCongressof

Berlin,thelatterwereplacedundertheoccupationandadministrationoftheHapsburgmonarchy.SerbsinbothSerbiaand

AustriaobjectedastheyconsideredthelandsrightlySerbian.

Croatresponsevaried.Somecensuredtheact,consideringthe

landsCroatlands.OthersembracedthefreeingofsouthSlays

fromOttomancontrolandsawinAustrianoccupationthe

promiseofafutureamalgamationofCroatiawithBosniaand

HercegovinaundertheAustrianMonarchy.-

_______

TheantagonismthatgrewupduringtheI870s,increased

significantlyasthetwentiethcenturyapproached.InSerbia,

extremeformsofnationalzealwereconsciouslyfostered

throughthepress,churchandschools.ontheextremeofSer

bianchauvinismwasanarticlewrittenbyNikolaStojanovicIfl

1902called"SerbsandCroats"inwhichhearguedthatthe

Croats"didnothavetheirownlanguage,norcommoncustoms,

norastrongcommonidentity,nor,whatisimpOItttlt,conscious

nessofbelongingtooneanother,asaresulttheycannotbea

separatenationality."Hecontinuedbystressingthattheconflict

betweenSerbsandCroatswouldcontinue"untileitherweoryou

areeliminated.Onesidemustsurrender."Atthesametime,CroatiannationalismwasfednotonlybY

ongoingconfrontationswiththeSerbsbutalsobytheruleofNineteenthcenturyMuslimBosnianwarrior-theyneedhishelpnow.[MetroTorontoReferenceLibrary]

Page 4: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

KarolyKhuen-Hedervay,theHungariangovernorofCroatia.Hegovernedbytheprincipleofdivideandrule,panderingtothedesiresoftheSerbianminorityonmattersreligious,economic,andeducationalinreturnfortheirsupportinthesabor.TheCroatianPartyoftheRight,movedevenfarthertotheextremeintheirchauvinismandunderanewleader,JosipFrank,turnedtoviolenceaswellasharshrhetoric.In1896,HapsburgSerbswereconfrontedbyCroatnationalistswithdemonstrationsandflagburningsandin1902,followingthepublicationof"SerbsandCroats,"CroatstooktothestreetsbeatingandharassingSerbsanddestroyingtheirproperty.

In1905,fiveSerbianandCroatianpartieswithintheHapsburgMonarchycametogethertoformtheCroatian-SerbianCoalition.Thepartybelievedintheexistenceofonenationality-Yugoslav-withthreenames-Serb,Croat,andSlovene.JustastheCatholicandProtestantGermanscouldmakeuppartsofthesameGermanysotoocouldCatholicandOrthodoxsouthSlays.Thepartywonatleastapluralityineachofthesucceedingpre-warfreeelections,indicatingsupportfortheir"Yugoslav"ideas.However,eventhispartydidnotcompletelyagreeastothefutureofaYugoslavstate.WhereasavocalportionconceivedofaunitarystateconsistingonlyofHapsburgSlaysanothersectionarguedthatanysouthSlavicstatemustcomprisetheSerbsofSerbiaandMontenegro.Moreover,whileagreementcouldbereachedconcerningoppositiontotheAustroHungariangovernment,theissueofBosniaandHercegovinaremainedaprofoundobstacle.Eachgrouplaidvocalclaimstotheirhistoricandethnicrighttothelands,realizingthatwhoevercontrolledthoselandswouldinessencehavetheupperhandinarbitrationoversouthSlavleadership.-

FollowingtheassassinationoftheArchdukeFranzFerdinand,heirtotheHapsburgthrone,in1914,Croatianultra-nationalists,takingtheircuesfromVienna,organizedandcarriedoutacampaignofpersecutionagainsttheSerbianpopulation,especiallyinBosnia-HercegovinawhereSarajevoturnedintoa"frenzyofhate."SimultaneouslytheyharanguedtheleadersoftheCroatian-SerbiancoalitionintheCroatianAssemblycallingthem"murderersoftheCroatianheirtothethrone."TheysoughtandtookadvantageofanyopportunitytoopenachasmbetweenSerbsandCroats.

NineteenthCenturyNationalism:TheSlovenesandMacedonlans

TheSloveniansgavelittleseriousconsiderationtotheYugoslavideauntilthe1880sand1890s.SlovenenationalconsciousnesswasslowtomakeitswayoutfromunderneaththedominationofGermaninfluences.AssuchtheSlovenesweremoreinterestedinthedevelopmentoftheirownidentitythantheywereinasouthSlavidentity.TheyfrequentlyspurnedSerbianadvancesbecausetheyregardedthemasbothpoliticallyandeconomicallybackward.

Nationalistsentimentswerealsogrowing,althoughatamuchslowerpaceamongtheMacedonianpopulation.In1896theInternalMacedonianRevolutionaryOrganizationIMROwasbornwhichstruggledtothrowoffforeignrule.IntheMacedonianregionthatcameunderSerbiancontrolin1913anareathathadformedpartofDusan’sMedievalempire,thenewSerbmastersbeganapolicyofculturalandlinguisticassimilation.Macedonianswerecompelledthroughthreatsofimprisonment,torture,anddeathtochangetheirnamestoSerbianstyleby

adding"itch"totheending.

TheFirstYugoslaviaIsBorn,1918

In1914,theconceptofYugoslavismnowherereceivedanymorethanreservedsupportfromthesouthSlavpeoples.ThefinalcreationofYugoslaviacamealmostasanaccidentandwasfraughtfromtheoutsetwithinternalweaknessesandcontradictions.

WartimemeetingsbetweenrepresentativesoftheHapsburgSlaysandtheexiledSerbiangovernmentculminatedintheDeclarationofCorfuinJulyof1917whichagreedinprincipletotheunionofallsouthSlays.Despitetheenumerationofspecificcharacteristicsforthenewstate-constitutional,democraticmonarchy,freedomofreligion,useofbothalphabetsCyrillicandLatin-theissueofafederalorcentralstatestructurewasnotresolvedandremainsunsolvedtothisday.

Twothreateningforces-oneinternal,oneexternal-actedasthecatalystsfortheeventualcreationofthefirst"Yugoslav"statein1918calledtheKingdomofSerbs,Croats,andSlovenesruledbytheSerbianKingAleksandar.Ontheonehand,thecollapsingHapsburglandswerecaughtinaspiralofspontaneouspeasantunrestthatresultedfromacombinationofwartimedeprivationsandlongstandinghardship.Ontheotherhand,ItaliantroopswereadvancingintosouthSlaviclands.TheItalianshadbeenpromisedpartsofCroatiaandSloveniabytheAlliesatthesecretLondontreatyof1915inreturnforenteringthewarontheAlliedside.Whenthewarendedtheycametocollectpayment.

CircusDemocracyandaPoliceState:YugoslaviaDuringtheInterwarPeriodFromtheoutset,internalproblemsthreatenedtobreakthenewstateapart.TheKingdomofSerbs,CroatsandSloveneswas

ETHNIC/RELiGIOUSBREAKDOWNOFFORMERYUGOSLAVIA-Areasshadedrepresentregionsinwhichthatreligionand/orethnicityformedthemajority.MacedoniaandSerbiahaveseparatebranchesoftheOrthodoxchurch[Electromap,Inc.]

**Orthodox,*:***Serbia,,andMacedoniant

Catholic

__________

Muslims,Slavic

_______

Muslims,Albanian

MAY1g3.ORIGINS.5

Page 5: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

verymuchmorethanthat.ItwasamosaicthatincludedfiveSlavicpeoplesandavarietyofminoritynon-Slays,threereligions,eighthistoricalprovinces,threemainlanguagesaswellasahostofdialects,twoalphabetsandaplethoraofbothbadandgoodfeelingthatwasthelegacyofrelationsduringthepre-waryears.Moreover,thecomponentpeoplesfoundthemselvesatverydifferenteconomicandsocialconditions.TheoldAustroHungarianlandsCroatia,Slovenia,andVojvodinaweremoreindustrialized.Serbia,MontenegroandBosnia-Hercegovina

‘accountedfornomorethan15%ofthenation’sindustry.Serbsviewedthenewstateasacontinuationofthepre-1914

SerbianKingdom,withitsconstitution,army,monarchy,andbureaucracy.TheypromotedSerb-dominatedcentralizationandtheslogans,"threenames-onepeople"and"thethreetribesoftheYugoslavnation."However,overtforcesofdivisioncamefromCroatseparatistmovements,thePartyofRightandtheCroatPeasantPartyledbyStepanRadic.By1930,thePartyoftheRightledbyAntePavelichadturnedintoaultra-nationalistparamilitaryterroristorganizationtheustasa,findingsupportinMussoliniwhowishedtoseeanindependentCroatiathathecouldpullintohissphereofinfluence.RadicandtheCroatPeasantPartycalledforalooseconfederationofrepublicsand

refusedtocompromise.TheytooktheircomplaintstotheinternationalcommunitytryingtofindabackerfortheirvisionofanindependentCroatia.TheseactionssmackedofbetrayalfortheSerbpopulationswhoweredismayedthattheCroatswantedoutsosoon.

ThesouthSlavicexperiencewithdemocracyinthel920swasoneofexasperationandfrustrationinwhichlittlewasachieved.Thenationwideelectionsof1920returnedcandidatesfromawholespectrumofregionallybasedparties.Thedividedparliamentariansvetoed,obstructedandblockedanylegislationthatcamethrough,strugglingtotailorittotheneedsoftheirspecificlocality.Tocapthingsoff,RadicandfourothermembersofparliamentwereshotbyadisaffectedMontenegrinpolitician.KingAleksandartookthisopportunitytoterminatetheunworkableparliamentandinstitutearoyaldictatorship.InOctober,1929thenameofthenationwasofficiallychangedtoYugoslavia.Aleksandardecreedaconstitution,proclaimingacentralizedstate.Inanefforttofosteranationalunity,citizenswerehenceforthtoconsiderthemselves"Yugoslav,"allsignsandsymbolsoftheoldnationalitieswereremovedandallmeasureswerebackedwithforce.

TheassassinationofAleksandarinFrancein1934-apparentlycoordinatedbytheustasaandIMRO-onceagainremappedthenationallandscape.By1939,Yugoslaviawaseffectivelydividedintotwospheresofinfluence,oneCroatian,theotherSerbian.Croatiawasmadeintoanenlargedprovincewithspecialautonomouspowers,aseparatelegislature,andcontroloffiscalandadministrativematters.ThislookedverymuchlikethelooseconfederalsolutionthatRadichadsearchedforduringthe1920s.Thefinalboundariesbetweenthetwospheres,however,wereneverspecificallydefined-theissueofthemixedpopulationsofBosniaandHercegovinaremainedunanswerable.ThisnewagreementalsoentirelydismissedtheequalityoftheothernationalitieswithinYugoslavia,afactthattheyverymuchresented.

WorldWarII:YugoslaviaShattered,GenocideandResistance

OfalltheincidentsinthepastrelationsofthesouthSlays,WorldWarIIandthetreatmentoftheSerbsbytheCroatustasagovernmentismostoftenrehashedandisbyfarthemostincendiary.FollowingtheAxisvictory,Yugoslaviawascutupintotinypiecesanddividedamongstthevictors-Germany,Italy,Hungary,BulgariaandAlbania.InCroatia,afascistgovernment,ledbyPavelic,waserectedonthefoundationoftheustasa.ItwastherealizationofthelongdesiredindependentCroatstateandincludedallofBosniaandHercegovinawithitspopulationofapproximately50%Serbsand30%Muslims.

TheCroatustasagovernmentorganizedsystematicmassacresoftheSerbsonCroatianterritory.TheextentanddegreeofthehorrorisbitterlydebatedtodaybetweenSerbsandCroats.CertainhistorianshaveclaimedthatthedestructionoftheSerbsrankssecondonlytotheJewishHolocaustinbothferocityandvolume.OthersarguethatitwastheGermans,nottheCroats,whocarriedoutthemassacres.SomeputthenumberofSerbianvictimsat200,000,othersat600,000,stillothersatmore.Inonedocumentedcase,1,260SerbianpeasantswerelockedinanOrthodoxchurch,murderedandincinerated.Moreover,theCatholicchurchinstitutedapolicyofforcibleconversionofOrthodoxSerbsthatturnedsome200,000SerbsintoCatholics.

KingAleksandar-firstkingofYugoslavia,1918-1934.[MetroTorontoReferenceLibrary]

6ORIGINS.MAY1993

Page 6: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

AsWorldWarIIcametoaclose,civilwarandanarchybrokeoutinYugoslavia.Thetwoprimaryresistanceforces-Mihailovic’sChetniksandTito’sPartisans-foughtboththeconqueringGermans,theCroatustasa,andeachothertheChetnikstendedtoberoyalists,thePartisans,communistsandtheChetniksoftencollaboratedwiththeGermanforcesagainstthePartisans.Localpopulationsarmedthemselvesagainsttheinvaders,againstthedifferentparamilitaryorganizationsandagainsttheirneighbors.Thecivilwarinvolvedeveryoneanditleftdeepscars.

TitoTriestoSolvetheNationalQuestionThedevelopmentofTito’sresponsetothenationalquestioncanbeseeninfourrelativelydistinctstages.Thefirststage,until1948,reflectedaSoviet,Stalinistsolutiontoamulti-ethnicsociety.FivedistinctYugoslavnations,sixrepublics,andtwoautonomousregionswererecognized.Administrativestructureswerecreatedtosupportandbolsterethniccomplexitybutcounterbalancedbyahighlycentralized,single-partydictatorshipwithastrongpolicepresenceandcentrallymanagedeconomy.

FollowingthebreakwiththeSovietUnionin1948,thecentralgovernmenttookitsfirststepstowardsthedecentralizationofboththeeconomyandthepoliticalstructuretolowerlevelsandworkerscooperativestherebybeginningthesecondstage.InYugoslavia,‘local’means‘ethnic’andthedecisiontodivestthecenterofitsmonopolyservedtoinflameregionalanimositiesandenhanceinter-regionalcompetitionastheygrappledforscarceresources.

Thatregionalallegianceswereonceagainontherisewasshownbyresistancetoa"Yugoslavism"campaigndesignedtofosteranoverarchingsupranationalsentimentthatwouldoverridethecentripetalregional-nationalistforces.TheindustriallymoreadvancedCroatiaandSlovenia,believingthattheyhadreceivedtheshortendofthestick,lobbiedforgreaterliberalizationwhileatthesametimecomplainedthatmanyofthestatedepartmentsandespeciallythatofsecurity,weredominatedbyethnicSerbs.Theysawthepolicyof"Yugoslavism"asaveiledattemptonthepartoftheSerbiancentertore-instatethetypeofYugoslaviathathadexistedunderKingAleksandartwenty-fiveyearsbefore.Inthefaceofthisnegativereactionthe"Yugoslavism"programwasscrappedandtheliberalizersfinallyswayedTitototheirside.Thecentralizerswerepurgedin1966andYugoslaviamovedontothethirdstageoftheTitoistnationalsolution.

From1965,themovetowardslocal"self-management"took

onanewandacceleratedspeed.Economicreformswereundertakenthat,forallintentsandpurposes,endedcentraldecisionmakingandplacedcontrolofinvestmentfundsandthebankingsystemintothehandsoflocalethnicauthorities.Thesebodiesquicklycametofunctiononlywithinaspecificregionorlocalityinsmall,inefficientunits.

Atthistime,moreover,theautonomousprovincesofKosovoandVojvodina,technicallywithinthejurisdictionofSerbia,gainedofficialautonomy.InKosovo,nationalistdemonstrationsbythemajorityAlbanianpopulationresultedintheflightoflargepartsoftheethnicSerbswho,filledwithresentment,fearedfortheirfuture.TheSerbsconsideredKosovotobetheheartlandoftheoldMedievalSerbianstateandclaimeditonhistoricalgrounds.TheAlbaniansrightlypointedtotheirdemographicdominance-approximately80%ofthepopulation-andtheirhistoricrootsonthelandwhichdatebacktowellintotheeigh

teenthcentury.AtthesametimeCroatian

leaderswerebecomingevenmoreassertiveintheirdemandsforgreaterautonomyandovertsignsofsovereignty.The1967Croatian"LanguageDeclaration"calledfortherecognitionofCroatianasanequal,officialYugoslavianlanguage-tobetaughtinschoolsandusedinthemedia-andrejectedSerboCroatianasanartificial,Serbinflicted"politicallanguage."

Thisperiodalsowitnessedtherecognitionoftwo"new"nations-theBosnianMuslim1968-69andtheMacedonian1967.ForthefirsttimeinhundredsofyearsBosniaandHercegovinaaswellasMacedoniawereofficiallyconsideredethnicallybasednations,ratherthansimplydistinctculturalcommunities.

TitoStepsIn

Theadministrationofthecountrywascollapsinganddead

lockedinthemazeofmutualvetoesbuiltintotheconstitution.Inthisatmosphereofgrowinginternalethnictension,Titosteppedin1971,threateningmilitaryintervention,tobringthecrisisundercontrol.

Tito’sdrasticmeasuresof1971-72inauguratedthefourthphaseofthenationalsolution.Thefederalsystemremainedinplaceandwasevenbolsteredbythe1974constitutionthatleftonlyquestionsofforeignpolicy,defense,andgeneraleconomicdirectiontothecentralpowers.ThegreatestdifferencebetweenthethirdandfourthphaseswasTitowhoassertedhisgreatpersonalpowertokeepalidontheboilingpot.ThenewleadershadlearnedthatTitowouldnolongertoleratetheovertexpressionofregionalinterests.Moreover,thesesameleadershadcometorealizethatlocalistsentimentcould,ifoutofhand,acttodisruptother,perhapsmoreimportant,componentstotheir

MAY1943.ORIGINS.7

Page 7: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

lives,suchastheeconomy.Duringthe1970stheeconomywasontheriseandfewpeoplewishedtodisturbthesuccess.

Despitetherelativequietofthel970s-asignificantriseinthenumberofcitizenswhodescribedthemselvesas"Yugoslav,"ratherthanasamemberofaspecificethnicgroup,appearedtobodewellforYugoslavia’sfuture-theregional-nationalistwaterscontinuedtoboil,shownbyfurtherdemonstrationsandarrestsinKosovointhemid-l970s.WiththedeathofTitoin1980,thesafetycatchesontheliddisappeared.

TheSuccession:’FromTito’sDeathtoToday

ThetwomostimportantfactorsthatkeptYugoslaviafrombreakingapartbefore1980haddisappearedbythesecondhalfofthel980s-Titowasdeadandtheeconomydisintegrated.Foreignpressure,traditionallytheotherimportantforcekeepingYugoslaviatogetherwasincoherentandinternallydisorganized-theColdWarwasoverandtheEuropeanCommunity,indispute.

Inthisenvironment,regionalpoliticalleaders-whoespousedchauvinist,ethnic,populistmessages-combinedwiththepeopletoworkeachotherintoafrenzy.SlobodanMilosevic,whobecameCommunistPartyChiefofSerbiain1986,remainsthemostprominentofthesenationalistleadersbutwascertainlynottheonlyone.Byfosteringstreetdemocracyandmassrallies,Milosevicstartedinmotionaperpetualbacklashbetweentherepublics,mostespeciallybetweenSloyeniaandSerbia.

MiloseviccapitalizedonSerbgrievancesunderthefederalsystem.SerbscomplainedabouttheirlackofinfluenceinfederalYugoslaviawherethesignificanceoftheirlargerpopulationwaslostinasystemthatgaveequalweighttoeachethnicity,andspecificallyofwhattheyperceivedtobetheirrawtreatmentintheeconomicsphere;aboutthedivisionofSerbiaintothreepartsKosovoandVojvodinabytheCroatTitoandhissecondincommandKardelj,aSlovene;andaboutthenationalismandirredentismoftheseparatistAlbaniansinKosovo,whichtheybelievedwasbeingfosteredbytheotherrepublics.

Themulti-partyelectionsof1990broughtnon-Communist,regionallycenteredgovernmentsintopowerinSlovenia,Croatia,BosniaandHercegovina,andMacedonia.Justdaysbeforethefightingbegan,theycontinuedtorehashthelongstandingissuesoffederalversuscentralandthesplittingofYugoslaviaintoitsOttomanandHapsburgcomponents.ButwherewouldthebordersbeandhowwouldBosniaandHercegovinabedealtwith?Fragmentationranamokastwohundredregionallybasedpartiesemerged.AllattemptsatreformbythePrimeMinisterAnteMarkovicwereblockedorunderminedbydifferentethnicparties,reminiscentofthepoliticalstalemateoftheearlyinterwaryears.ThistimetherewasnoTitoorAleksandartorestorestability.

Regionalnationalismgrewlikewildfire.FearofseparatistmovementssoaredamongSerbslivingoutsideofSerbiaandrelationsbetweentherepublicssoured.Thememoriesofpast

[KirkAnderson]

8*ORIGINS.MAY1993

Page 8: ORIGINS MAY1993origins.osu.edu/sites/origins.osu.edu/files/origins - May 1993 - Gordian Knot.pdfVuk Karadzic standardized the Serbian language around the "stokavian" vernacular dialect.

conflictswereblownoutofproportionforpoliticalend.SerbspointedtothehorrorsoftheindependentCroatianstateduringWorldWarIIand,inahighlypublicizedincident,CroatleadersrenamedasquareinZagrebafterAnteStarcevic,the19thcenturyCroatianultra-nationalistwhounfavorablycomparedSerbswithbarnyardanimals.

FearofanindependentCroatiangovernmentwasespeciallyfierceintheKrajinaregionwheretheSerbsrepresentedthemajorityofthepopulation.Miloseviccametothesupportofthe"foreign"Serbsdemandingrightsandprotectionfortheircommunities.Hedidnotopposeself-determinationonthepartoftheotherrepublicsbutaskedthatthesamecourtesybeextendedtothemajoritySerbpopulationswithintheirboundaries.Hequietlyencouragedthe"foreign"Serbstodemandit-thisdespitehisblatantdenialofself-determinationoftheAlbanianpopulationinKosovo.

IntheKrajina,localSerbs,notalwaysfollowingBelgrade’slead,tookmattersandtheinitiativeintotheirownhands.Theyarmedthemselves,blockedroads,andtookoverlocalfacilities.Aspessimismgrew,SloveniaandCroatiapreparedforagunfight.TheYugoslavPeople’sArmyJNAbelievedintheimportanceofmaintainingYugoslaviaintactwithoutwhichtheywouldhavenojobandoftencametosidewiththeSerbiangovernmentandlocalSerbmilitias.InJuneof1991,followingtheSerbsponsoredblockingoftherotationofthepresidency,SloveniaandCroatiadeclaredindependence.Sabersrattled,leadersmisjudged,andboththepeopleandtheirstatesacceleratedarming.Theviolentconflicthadbegun.

Books,Gitanes,andCDs

Overthepasttwoyears,thefightinghasmovedfromSloveniatoCroatiatoBosniaandHercegovina.WhileSloveniaisnowrelativelyquiet,battlescontinuetorageinCroatiabetweentheKrajinaSerbsandthenewCroatgovernment.InBosniaandHercegovina,SerbsandCroats-astheyhaveforhundredsofyears-arefightingtheSlavicMuslimstocarveoutcontrolofaregionthattheybothclaim.OvertviolencehasyettosweepVojvodina,KosovoorMacedonia.However,thesethreeregionsmayprovetobethemosttragic.Eachareaincludesalargenon-SlavicpopulationHungarian,Albanian,andBulgarianandTurkishrespectivelyandconflictcouldconceivablydragneigh-

boringnationsintotheYugoslavmaelstrom.GeorgeSantayanawarnedthatthosewhodonotremember

theirpastaredestinedtorepeatit.ButthesouthSlaysremembertheirhistoryalltoowellandneverthelessseemcondemnedtoreliveit.WhiletheforcesofhistoryhaveledtothebreakupofYugoslaviaandserveasthewellspringoftheviolence,ifthesouthSlaysaretocometoaresolutionoftheproblemoutsideofmutualannihilation,theymustforgettheirpastandconcentrateonlyonsalvagingthepresent-aformidabletaskinYugoslavia.

Asalways,however,itshouldberememberedthatthisisawarfoughtbypeople,nottheforcesofhistory.Thereasonsforfightingarenotalwaysasclearashistorymightmakethemappear.InareportpublishedinHarper’sMagazineofMarch,1993,"BalkanDeathTrip-ScenesFromaFutileWar,"TonyHorwitzrelaysthepersonalmotivationsofaSerbnamedZjelkofightingforhometownSarajevo.Itisapainfulreminderthatwarisoftenaboutnothingatall,thatpeoplecontinuetofightbecausetheywantsimplyforthefightingtoend.

Idon’tfightfornationalism-Isleepwithgirlsofallnations.Idon’tfightforreligion-Godisnoplace.IfightbecauseIwanttogobackdownthere[thedowntownhouseheleftmonthsearlierinfearofattacksonSerbs]withmybooksandmyCDplayerandmyGitanecigarettes.

Slovenianpeasantinmorepeacefultimes.[JosephineKing]

MAY13.ORIGINS.9


Recommended