OSU MINI MALTER
Sponsor – OSU Food Science Department
ME 497/498
Project Number: 73
Faculty Advisor: Joe Hortnagl
Sponsor Mentor: Tom Shellhammer, Jeff Clawson
Oral Presentation 2
Tyler Froemming
10/28/2010
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
•The OSU Pilot brewery, located in the Department of Food Science and Technology, is the perfect facility for testing, developing, and demonstrating the suitability of Oregon barley for Oregon malts. •The brewery requires approximately 200 to 300 lbs of barley to produce malt for a 100 gallon brew.
•Mechanical Engineering students will design, build, and develop a pilot malting unit - a “flex box” for steeping,germinating, and kilning in a single unit.
•The flex box will removethe malting bottleneck and get Oregon grain flowing to Oregon glasses.
Sponsor – OSU Food Science Department
Tyler Froemming 10/28/10 Project 73: OSU Mini Malter
DESIGNS CONSIDERED
Rectangular Single-Chambered Malter This malter will be a cube shaped design It will perform the steeping, germinating, and kilning process all in one
chamber. Advantage: Can meet our size constraint by making the box long Disadvantage: Will not mix the barley as thorough. Hard to mix barley
in the corners. Circular Single-Chambered Malter
This malter will be a cylindrical shaped design Again we will design this malter to perform all three processes in one
vessel. Advantage: Will be able to mix easier and more thorough Disadvantage: Will be bigger
Two-Chambered Malter This malter design has 2 different chambers so 2 of the processes are
performed in one chamber and the other process is performed separately.
Advantage: Easier to interface all of the components with different chambers
Disadvantage: Would have to add an extra step to move the barley from one chamber to the other.
Tyler Froemming 10/28/10 Project 73: OSU Mini Malter
DESIGN SELECTED
We will begin to pursue the circular shaped, single-chambered malter.
This design will make mixing the barley during germination and kilning easier. Mixing the barley during those stages is a heavily weighted customer requirement.
The circular design is much simpler than the rectangular and also allows for more efficient airflow.
We believe that having a single-chamber malter is totally feasible to design and still satisfy all our customer requirements.
We will begin to concentrate on this design but other designs are not out of the question.
Tyler Froemming 10/28/10 Project 73: OSU Mini Malter
SCHEDULE AND BUDGET
OSU Mini Malter Gantt Chart
Task Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11
List CR's and get signatures
Oral Progress Report 1
Brainstorm Design Ideas
Progress Status Report 1
List ER's w/ Targets and Tolerances
Oral Progress Report 2
Preliminary Proposal
Create Solid Model
Construct BOM
Progress Status Report 2
Develop Manufacturing Plan
Oral Progress Report 3
Develop Testing Plan
Final Proposal
Contact Vendors and Order Parts
Total Dollars Available 10000
Anticipated ExpensesMaterials 2500Machining 2000Electronic Controls 4000
Expenses to date 0
Balance 1500
Tyler Froemming 10/28/10 Project 73: OSU Mini Malter
We are currently on schedule