Date post: | 12-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | prasad-chandane |
View: | 163 times |
Download: | 4 times |
OTM Implementation Tom Meisinger ([email protected]) and Adam Stibitz ([email protected]) - Global Logistics 2016
3
Panduit Overview
Panduit delivers comprehensive infrastructure solutions to help customers achieve operational and financial goals. Panduit is known for quality
products and innovative technological leadership combined with a strong international group of partners.
4
About the Company
§ Independent, financially sound leader since 1955 § Over $1B in annual sales § At least 8% annual investment in R&D § Operations in 35 countries, serving customers in 120 countries § 5000+ employees worldwide § Over 4,000,000 ft2 of manufacturing and warehouse capacity
5
Global Logistics
USA
China
Singapore
Romania
CostaRica
Mexico
Netherlands
Chile
UAE
Japan
Australia
6
How is this different from what we currently do? - Prior State
§ Operational inefficiencies and high costs become major hurdles in global freight distribution.
§ Panduit was incapable of optimizing freight management.
• Minimal shipment consolidation • Limited visibility to global shipments in transit. • The freight settlement process is time consuming and relies heavily on human
intervention. • No freight analytics
7
How is this different from what we currently do? - Current State
§ The OTM module provided us a single platform to manage all transportation activities throughout our Supply Chain network.
§ Components:
– Planning and Execution – Shipment Visibility – Freight Settlement – Transportation Intelligence
8
DistributorDistributor
PresentState FutureState
Parcel/SmallPackages
LTL/PalletFreight
ConsolidatedShipment
OTM Transformation
Visibility
Analy4cs
FreightInvoicing
CurrentStatePriorState
9 9
Deliveries
PlannedShipment/Trip
OracleEB
S11.5.10.2
WMSOM Carriers
ItemMaster
Loca9onMaster
ActualShipment
PaymentVoucher
ShipmentPlanning
ShipmentExecuEon
Visibility
FreightSeJlement
Dashboard
OTMCloud
ShipmentNo9fica9on
TenderOffer(email/pos9ng)
TenderResponse(WebPortal)
ShipmentEvent(WebPortal)
Invoice
ShipmentEvent
EDI/EDIFACT
Integration
EDI/EDIFACT
EDI/EDIFACT
LTLRa9ng SMC/CzarLite
PCMilerTLMileage
10
DeliveryCreationSO
AOr
acleE
BSOT
M
OracleEBSR11andOTMv.6.3.4.1
OrderBooked
OrdersscheduledandpassedthroughPOF/reservationchecks
DeliveryAssignment
DeliverySenttoOTM(concurrentprogram
schedule)
DeliveryReleaseSent
Delivery(Order)AvailableforPlanning
OrdersarePlannedontoa
Shipment
PlannedShipmentSent
EBSTripCreated PickReleaseForm
ReleasedtoWarehouse
ShipmentActuals
UpdateShipmentActuals
11
Project Timeline/Schedule Plan
§ TheMexicoandNetherlandswarehousesweredeployedinfor4thquarterof2015.
Month April MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPT OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
Week 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
Analyze/Assessment
4Weeks
Design 2Weeks
Build 10Weeks
Test 3Weeks
Train(UAT) 2Weeks
RegressionTesOng
6Weeks
Cut-Over/Support 2Weeks 2Weeks PostSupport
MXW ECW
12
NLW MXW
NLW and MXW OTM Planning and Operations
§ Go-Live date was Nov. 2, 2015. § Bulk plans twice per day to
accommodate Parcel and LTL § 1800 lines processed daily. § CS cut-off time is 3:00pm and
warehouse cut-off time is 4:30pm. § Carrier communication via EDI. § Carrier coverage is currently
segmented by country. § Palletization
§ Go-Live date was Oct. 19, 2015. § Bulk Plans once per day at 4:30pm
to build multi-stop shipments. § 500 lines processed daily. § CS cut-off time is 3:00pm and
warehouse cut-off time is 4:30pm. § Carrier communication utilizes a
portal in OTM. § Carrier coverage is not segmented. § Dock Door Assignment
14
OTM Benefits
§ Optimize freight spend – Consolidating shipments reaped a benefit of reducing spend by 15%.
§ Enhance shipment visibility – Reduced expedites through improving visibility and proactively
identifying alternative method of transportation. § Automate Freight Settlement
– Reduced overhead by 20% through automating the freight payment, billing, and audit.
§ Streamline Logistics Dashboard – Reduced procurement spend, by 10%, through leveraging data
analytics.
15
Lessons Learned (Mexico and Netherlands) § EBS – OTM Integration
– EBS Shipment Outbound Process, SOA Failures, EBS R11. § User Acceptance/Adaptability
– Challenges with dealing with ambiguity/change – Management understanding/commitment
§ Go-Live – The deployments time, between Mexico and Netherlands,
needed a greater buffer – Setting expectations
16
Key Takes:
§ Assess the cost benefit of Cloud vs. On-Premise § Select an SI partner with insight and expertise. § Establish a strong project team
– Complemented by a adept project manager § Obtain commitment from Stakeholders § Assess the existing state in respect to the ERP suite/foundation § Timeline agility/flexibility § OTM is ubiquitous in impacting the entire value chain
17
OTM Roadmap
§ Deploying USA warehouse § Evaluate Inbound Raw Material § Assess future location § Assess the benefits of other OTM components
18
Panduit OTM Awards
§ 2016 Oracle Excellence Award for Supply Chain, Logistics § 2015 Inspirage Innovation Partner of the Year § 2015 Panduit Process Improvement Project of the Year
19
Core Project Team Members
§ Tom Meisinger, Global Logistics Planner § Sam Hanieh, Global Logistics Manager § Gurpreet Sidhu, Manager Solution Architecture Inspirage § Adam Stibitz, Global Logistics Systems Specialist § Katherine Fisher, Logistics Analyst