of 32
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
1/32
- 1 -
ESSENTIALS OFQUALITY MANAGEMENT
PN. NORKISME ZAINALABIDIN019 620 8585
no!"#$%&'!$.%('.$)
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
2/32
& )
- 2 -
Anything that does not add value to aprocess and that a customer would not
want to pay for; if given a choice
*+AT IS *ASTE,
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
3/32
- 3 -
3.Motion Excess
1. Transportation Excess
2.Inventory Excess
4. Waiting 5. Over-production
6. Over-processing
.!e"ects- #e$ects% #e&or'
(. )nused E*p+oyee ,reativity 'i++s
3
8 *ASTES T+AT +IDDEN INPRODU-TPRO-ESSPEOPLE
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
4/32
- 4 -
Definition
Any information, or materialmovement that does not directlyadd value to a product orservice
Characteristics Comple computer trac!ing
system Critical process steps not
documented "tra floor space
TRANSPORTATION *ASTE.
Causes
#ac! of communication #ac! of procedure documentation $nconsistent schedule
"amples %ransporting material &etween sites
'ovement of paper &etween peopleor department
(ending samples for measurementor approval)
*andling material more than once,unnecessary moving or handling ofmaterial
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
5/32
- + -
Definition
Any supply in ecess of customerreuirements necessary forproduct or services
Characteristics
%oo many forms or paper %oo many copies "tra space for storage
Causes
'anagement decision $ncapa&le processes $naccurate information flow
"amples nnecessary raw materials, wor! in
process ./$0, finished stoc!s, euipment parts
"lectronics, paper archivesreports 'ultiple receipt of same email
%wo forms used with sameinformation
"cess /$0 or office supplies 0hysical or email in&o and out&o)
IN/ENTORY *ASTE
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
6/32
- -
Definition
Any movement of people or toolsthat do not add value to theproduct or services
Characteristics
#oo!ing to find information,supplies or euipment
%oo much search or wal! time 'ultiple trips to filing rooms or
copy center)
Causes
#ayout not planned &ut evolves #ac! of adeuate information or
service euipment #ac! of wor!place organi5ation
"amples
"cessive wal!ing due toinappropriate wor! place lay out
6ending, stretching, reaching %oo many mouse clic!s7 multiple
screens to update info etc)
MOTION *ASTE P%o% o Too#3
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
7/32
- 8 -
Definition
$dle time that is produced when twoprocesses are not synchroni5ed
Characteristics
n&alance wor!load
0rocess flow stops due tounplanned interruptions
9ueues or idle time
Causes
$nconsistent wor! method #ac! of proper information
availa&ility of flow #ac! of process standardi5ation Capacity doesn:t match volume)
"amples
$dle time created when material,information, people, or euipment is
not ready /aiting for wor! to arrive /aiting for your computer /aiting for approvals, signatures,
the copier, late start of meeting)
*AITING
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
8/32
- -
Definition
0roducing more than needed orproducing faster than needed
Characteristics
"tra information, supplies oreuipment)
n&alanced wor!flow
#arge &atch si5es
Causes
Automation in wrong places) < =ust in case < reward)
"amples "arly production, producing over
customer orders, producingunordered materials goods
0rocessing wor! or supplies &eforethe net person or tas! is ready for
it) 0rinting more copies than needed >rdering thousands of &rochure
&ecause they are cheaper that way Daily reporting even if no&ody reads
them
Copying more people than neededusin re l to all on email
O/ER4PRODU-TION
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
9/32
- ? -
Definition
"ffort which adds no value to aproduct or services
Characteristics
6ottlenec!s
#ac! of understanding customerneeds)
"ndless refinement
@edundant approvals or chec!s
Causes
ew technology used inappropriately Decision ma!ing at inappropriate
level) $neffective policies and procedures)
"amples Design and &uilding to tighter specs) Adding more features than reuired) @eports have too much in detail that
is not used) @ecording same info multiple times,
places %oo many reuired signatures or at
too high level authori5ation)
O/ER4PRO-ESSING
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
10/32
- 1B -
Definition
@ewor!redo a product or serviceto meet customersreuirements
Characteristics "tra manpower reuired to
rewor!, revalidate, re-do 'issed datelines due dates 0oor customer relations
Causes
$ncapa&le process "cess variation in processing $nsufficient training 'anagement Decisions)
"amples Customer returns (crap or yield loss Conflicting or inconsistent data
(oftware &ugs
Coding errors on forms 'isapplied payment
DEFE-TS
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
11/32
- 11 -
Definition
ot plugging into and leveraging!nowledge and ideas of youremployees)
Characteristics "mployees feel powerless >nly do what they are told
#osing times, ideas, s!ills,improvement oppurtunities
Causes
ot engaging or empoweringemployees
%op down directives o process to tap into employees
ideas)
"amples "mployees !now how to fi issues
&ut not as!ed for inputs or given timeto fi)
0eople front line, most familiar with
the process not involved in thedecision ma!ing
%as!s done &y overualified people) #ac! of direction
UNUSED EMPLOYEE -REATI/ITY SKILLS
12
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
12/32
- 12 - EAMPLE OF *ASTE
13
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
13/32
- 13 -
3.Motion Excess
1. Transportation Excess
2.Inventory Excess
4. Waiting 5. Over-production
6. Over-processing
.!e"ects- #e$ects% #e&or'
(. )nused E*p+oyee ,reativity 'i++s
13
8 *ASTES T+AT +IDDEN INPRODU-TPRO-ESSPEOPLE
14
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
14/32
- 14 - EER-ISE 2 7 I(%n")"n: ;
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
15/32
- 1+ -D%=n""on o S"> S":$perations
0rocess Capa&ility
Cycle %ime @eduction
Eero Defects
Customer Focused
Gariation @eduction
Design for (i (igma
6enefitA (i (igma program provides7H @apid, &rea!through performanceH Continuous improvement programH "ffective goals and metricsH >wnership of issues at contri&utor levelH (tandard pro&lem solving methodology
1
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
16/32
- 1 -
T+IS ONE ,,,
T+IS ONE ,,,
OR
18
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
17/32
- 18 -S"> S":$< M%?o(oo:) I# . . .
An overall methodology that drives &usinessimprovementsA proven tool set for driving and achieving
transformational changeA Continuous $mprovement 0rocess, focusing on
H Customer reuirementsH 0rocess alignmentH Analytical rigorH (peedy eecution
H %imely data driven decisionsA way to eradicate targeted sources of variation .e)g),
permanently reduce variation
1
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
18/32
- 1 -
1?
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
19/32
- 1? -DMAI- O@%@"%;
6ac!ground
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
20/32
- 2B -DMAI-
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
21/32
- 21 -D%=n% Oo'n""%# *?C intoCC@s
H Develop %eamJuidelines Jround@ules 6usiness Case
Joal (tatement
0roKect 0lan
>pportunity (tatement
0roKect (cope
%eam (election
%eam Charter
% A( ( A C%$ G $% $ "( @" (0 ) ( %A @% D" ( % A% ( A C% $ >(
%A(( AC%$G$%$"( @"(0) (%A@% D" (%A%(AC%$>(
Action 0lan
(igma Joal .CC@
Jap
0roKect Focus
LL
CC@s
H $dentify AndorGalidate the6usiness$mprovement>pportunity
H Define Critical
Customer
@euirements
H Document .'ap0rocesses
H 6uild "ffective%eams
1.0Define
Opportunities
2)B'easure
0erformance
3)BAnaly5e
>pportunity
4)B$mprove
0erformance
+)BControl
0erformance
22
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
22/32
- 22 -M%utput$ndicators
H >perationalDefinitions
H Data CollectionFormats and0lans
H 6aseline0erformance
H 0roductive %eamAtmosphere
H $dentify $nput,
0rocess, and >utput$ndicators
H Develop >perationalDefinition 'easurement 0lan
H 0lot and Analy5eData
H Determine if (pecialCause "ists
H Determine (igma0erformance
H Collect >ther6aseline0erformance Data
$ np ut 0r oc es s > utp ut C C@
0rocess $ndicator
0rocess $ndicator
>utput $ndicator
$nput$ndicator
A B
A1
D1
D2
A2
A B
A1
D1
D2
A2
A B
A1
D1
D2
A2
Chec!sheets
CC@
Jap
(igmaM
N
C#
#C#
(igmaM
N
HDetermine /hatto 'easure
H 'anage'easurementData Collection
H Develop andGalidate'easurement(ystems
H Determine0rocess0erformance
1)BDefine
>pportunities
2.0Measure
Performance
3)BAnaly5e
>pportunity
4)B$mprove
0erformance
+)BControl
0erformance
23
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
23/32
- 23 -An&Kective 'ain Activities 0otential %ools and %echniues ey Delivera&les
Data Analysis
Galidated @oot Causes (ources of Gariation F'"A 0ro&lem (tatement 0otential (olutions
H (tratify 0rocess
H (tratify Data $dentify (pecific0ro&lem
H Develop 0ro&lem(tatement
H $dentify @oot CausesH Design @oot Cause
Gerification AnalysisH Galidate @oot CausesH Comparative AnalysisH (ources of Gariation
(tudiesH Failure 'odes "ffects Analysis
H @egression AnalysisH 0rocess ControlH 0rocess Capa&ilityH Design of
"periments
$ndicators 0ro&lem
(tatement.effect
0ro&lem(tatement
9uantified @oot Causes
2+O
+BO
T ot al R is k P ri or it y R es ul ti ng R i sk Pr io ri ty
Pr oces s/ Pr od uc t: F ME A D at e: (o ri gi na l)
FMEA Team: (Revised)
Blac Belt: Page: o!
Process Actions Results
"temProcess#te$s
PotentialFailureMode
PotentialE!!ects o!Failure
#everit%
Potential&ause(s)o! Failure
'ccurrence
&urrent&ontrols
Detection
RisPriorit%
RecommendedAction
Res$onsiilit%and Target&om$letionDate
ActionTaen
#everit%
'ccurrence
Detection
RisPriorit%
T ot al R is k P ri or it y R es ul ti ng R i sk Pr io ri ty
Process/Product: FMEA D ate: (ori ginal)
FMEA Team: (Revised)
Blac Belt: Page: o!
Process Actions Results
"temProcess#te$s
PotentialFailureMode
PotentialE!!ects o!Failure
#everit%
Potential&ause(s)o! Failure
'ccurrence
&urrent&ontrols
Detection
RisPriorit%
RecommendedAction
Res$onsiilit%and Target&om$letionDate
ActionTaen
#everit%
'ccurrence
Detection
RisPriorit%
Process/Product: FMEA D ate: (ori ginal)
FMEA Team: (Revised)
Blac Belt: Page: o!
Process Actions Results
"temProcess#te$s
PotentialFailureMode
PotentialE!!ects o!Failure
#everit%
Potential&ause(s)o! Failure
'ccurrence
&urrent&ontrols
Detection
RisPriorit%
RecommendedAction
Res$onsiilit%and Target&om$letionDate
ActionTaen
#everit%
'ccurrence
Detection
RisPriorit%
* + 1* 1+
*
1*
2*
,*
A$$roval Time
&%cleTime
* + 1* 1+
*
1*
2*
,*
A$$roval Time
&%cleTime
H nderstand@easons forGariation and$dentify 0otential@oot Causes
H (tratify and Analy5ethe >pportunities for$mprovement
H Determine (ources
of Gariation
H $dentify a (pecific0ro&lem and Definean "asilynderstood 0ro&lem(tatement
24
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
24/32
- 24 -I$o@% P%o$pportunities
2)B'easure
0erformance
3)BAnaly5e
>pportunity4.0
mprovePerformance
+)BControl
0erformance
2+
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
25/32
- 2+ --ono P%o$t access
0Bac and
8and inuries4
losttime4
insurance
e5$enseand
re3or
2
6
,
+ . 1 1*
0?$dateand clari!%$allet $lacement
$rocedures
0"ncludeto$ic in ne3sa!et% !ilm
./2/.
#tac
out)ound
containerson
$allet not to
e5ceed t3o
8ig8
0First la%er
not
com$leted
)e!ore
starting
secondla%er
0#tac
guidelines
not used
0&ontainers
!all 38ile
)eing li!ted
*
6
1
1 1 1 ,
0?$dateand clari!%loading guidelines
./2/+
oad $allets in
ve8icle 3it8
li!t truc and
secure
0Tiedo3 n
lines
damage)ul
mail 38en
tig8tened
0Tiedo3 n
guidelines
not clear
0"nured
!ingers4
damaged
out)ound
*
6
1
1 2 1 .
0?$dateand clari!%loading guidelines
"rror 'odes and "ffects Analysis
(igma Joal .CC@
Jap
$mplemented (olution
CC@
Jap
N
0rocess Control(ystem
0roKect /or!plan
CC@
H $mplement theFinal (olution
H Juarantee0rocess$mprovements Are'aintained
H "nsure that ew0rocess 0ro&lems
Are $dentified and
9uic!ly CorrectedH Disseminate#essons #earned,and $dentify@eplication and(tandardi5ation>pportunities
1)BDefine
>pportunities
2)B'easure
0erformance
3)BAnaly5e
>pportunity
4)B$mprove
0erformance
!.0"ontrol
Performance
2
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
26/32
- 2 -
DEFINE
28
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
27/32
- 28 -T)"
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
28/32
- 2 -ASSIGNMENT
1. (iterature #evie) of &i* &i+ma in %an,in+ sectors.
2. &teps in implementin+ &i* &i+ma
D-/-
Define Pro%lem &tatement &et O%ectives aselineuture
M-A&5#-
6no)in+ current status
"ause an$ -ffect Analysis7 is'%one"'oose 3 most causes
- 2? -
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
29/32
- 2? -ASSIGNMENT
A/A(89-
re:uency ; Mean; Me$ian ;Mo$e ; Pareto c'art;
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
30/32
- 3B -
0 %*" 6A($C ("G"
0 %*" >#D ("G"0 %*" F$@(% ("G"
8 9C %>>#(
- 31 -
7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
31/32
- 31 -
0 Cause-and-effectdiagram.also called $shi!awa or fish&onechart7 $dentifies many possi&le causes for an effect or pro&lemand sorts ideas into useful categories)
0 Chec! sheet7 A structured, prepared form for collecting and
analy5ing data; a generic tool that can &e adapted for a widevariety of purposes)
0 Control charts7 Jraphs used to study how a process changesover time)
0 *istogram7 %he most commonly used graph for showingfreuency distri&utions, or how often each different value in aset of data occurs)
8 9A#$%P C>%@># %>>#(
- 32 -
http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/cause-analysis-tools/overview/fishbone.htmlhttp://asq.org/learn-about-quality/cause-analysis-tools/overview/fishbone.htmlhttp://asq.org/learn-about-quality/cause-analysis-tools/overview/fishbone.htmlhttp://asq.org/learn-about-quality/cause-analysis-tools/overview/fishbone.html7/17/2019 OUM_ DAY 3
32/32
- 32 -
0 0areto chart7 (hows on a &ar graph which factorsare more significant)
0 (catter diagram7 Jraphs pairs of numerical data,one varia&le on each ais, to loo! for arelationship)
0 (tratification7 A techniue that separates data
gathered from a variety of sources so that patternscan &e seen .some lists replace QstratificationQ withQflowchartQ or Qrun chartQ)
8 9A#$%P C>%@># %>>#(