Listeria monocytogenesListeria monocytogenesListeria monocytogenesOutbreak Associated withListeria monocytogenes
Outbreak Associated withOutbreak Associated with Sprouts
Outbreak Associated with SproutsSproutsSprouts
Tracy StilesTracy StilesMassachussetts Dept. of Public Health State Laboratory
Foodborne Disease Surveillance Laboratories UnitMassachussetts Dept. of Public Health State Laboratory
Foodborne Disease Surveillance Laboratories Unit
Brian D. Sauders, Ph.D.New York State Dept. of Agriculture & Markets
Brian D. Sauders, Ph.D.New York State Dept. of Agriculture & Marketsp g
Food Laboratory, Microbiology Sectionp g
Food Laboratory, Microbiology Section
OverviewOverviewOverviewOverview• Listeria monocytogenes• Listeria monocytogenes• Listeria monocytogenes• Listeria monocytogenes
• Listeria in produce & sprouts• Listeria in produce & sprouts
• Outbreak investigation• Outbreak investigationg
S mmar
g
S mmar• Summary• Summary
Human ListeriosisHuman Listeriosis Clinical spectrum
– Gastroenteritis (diarrhea)– Invasive disease, third trimester abortions
Burden of human disease (CDC FoodNet)– ~2500 estimated cases in the US/year– ~92% cases are hospitalized– ~20-30% mortality (~500 deaths/year)
Primarily affects Primarily affects– Persons <1 y.o. and > 60 y.o. or those with underlying immuno-
compromised conditions– However can affect normally healthy personsHowever, can affect normally healthy persons
Distribution of cases– Most case reports considered sporadicost case epo ts co s de ed spo ad c– Large outbreaks have occurred
Listeria monocytogenesListeria monocytogenes
Considered “ubiquitous” in nature.
L. monocytogenes can survive in stressful environments; very acidic (pH 2.5) high salt (10 to 15%)g ( ) extreme temperatures (-0.4 to 50°C)
S 99% f f db Source: 99% of cases are foodborne. Contamination is often linked to processing plants, but
the role of contamination in retail establishments and inthe role of contamination in retail establishments and in consumer homes is not well understood.
L. monocytogenes PrevalenceL. monocytogenes PrevalenceNon-Food Processing Environments:• Pristine environments: 1 3% (n=900) (Sauders 2006)Pristine environments: 1.3% (n 900) (Sauders, 2006)• Urban environments: 7.3% (n=900) (Sauders, 2006)• Ruminant farms (Nightingale, 2004)( g g )
– Bovine farms with listeriosis cases: 24.35% (n=616)– Bovine farms without listeriosis cases: 20.06% (n=643)– Small ruminant farms with listeriosis: 32.92% (n=322) ( )– Small ruminant farms without listeriosis: 5.89% (n=475)
Food/Food Processing EnvironmentsFood/Food Processing Environments• Raw foods• Food processing environments: from <0.1% to 30% or morep g• Ready-To-Eat foods: 0.17 – 4.7 % (Gombas et al., 2003)
Listeria in Produce – Human DiseaseListeria in Produce – Human DiseaseListeria in Produce Human DiseaseListeria in Produce Human Disease
• 1922-1960: Reports link listeriosis in animals to contaminated • 1922-1960: Reports link listeriosis in animals to contaminated silage, but no links to human listeriosis identified.
1981 R t th t 18 f 41 h h d l l
silage, but no links to human listeriosis identified.
1981 R t th t 18 f 41 h h d l l• 1981: Report that 18 of 41 humans who consumed coleslaw that contained cabbage contaminated with L. monocytogenesdied (Canada).
• 1981: Report that 18 of 41 humans who consumed coleslaw that contained cabbage contaminated with L. monocytogenesdied (Canada).
• 1988: Five case of listeriosis linked to frozen broccoli and lifl (US)
• 1988: Five case of listeriosis linked to frozen broccoli and lifl (US)cauliflower (US).
• 1989: One case of listeriosis linked to salted mushrooms
cauliflower (US).
• 1989: One case of listeriosis linked to salted mushrooms• 1989: One case of listeriosis linked to salted mushrooms (Finland).
• 1989: One case of listeriosis linked to salted mushrooms (Finland).
Occurrence of Listeria in ProduceOccurrence of Listeria in ProduceOccurrence of Listeria in ProduceOccurrence of Listeria in Produce• 2003 FDA L. monocytogenes risk assessment identified
d f li t i i tb k• 2003 FDA L. monocytogenes risk assessment identified
d f li t i i tb kproduce as an uncommon cause of listeriosis outbreaks, however it noted that some human cases have occurred.– Vegetables: low predicted relative-risk of causing listeriosis in the
produce as an uncommon cause of listeriosis outbreaks, however it noted that some human cases have occurred.– Vegetables: low predicted relative-risk of causing listeriosis in the g p g
US on a per-serving basis, slight higher risk on a per-annum basis.– Estimated that median number of cases of listeriosis from vegetables
in the US was less than 1 case per year.
g p gUS on a per-serving basis, slight higher risk on a per-annum basis.
– Estimated that median number of cases of listeriosis from vegetables in the US was less than 1 case per year.p y
• Limited surveys in US have indicated the prevalence of L t i i d f 3 50%
p y
• Limited surveys in US have indicated the prevalence of L t i i d f 3 50%L. monocytogenes in various produce ranges from 3-50%– Potatoes, radishes, other root crops appear to have higher
prevalences of Lm (27-50%)
L. monocytogenes in various produce ranges from 3-50%– Potatoes, radishes, other root crops appear to have higher
prevalences of Lm (27-50%)
New York State Dept. of Agriculture & MarketsListeria monocytogenes regulatory screening tests for
d d t i i f d (J 2008 A 2009)
Commodity NumberNumber with LM % LMCommodity NumberNumber with LM % LM
produce or produce containing foods (Jan 2008- Apr 2009)
Commodity testedCommodity
CodeNumber
Screenedwith LM Present
% LM Positive
Fresh fruit/juices 270 5 0 0.0%Nuts & nut products* 360 1 1 100.0%
Commodity testedCommodity
CodeNumber
Screenedwith LM Present
% LM Positive
Fresh fruit/juices 270 5 0 0.0%Nuts & nut products* 360 1 1 100.0%Nuts & nut products 360 1 1 100.0%Fresh vegetables (sprouts) 390 35 4 11.4%Dried/dehyrdated vegetables 420 2 0 0.0%Cured and processed vegetab 430 5 0 0.0%A l id 30 1 0 0 0%
Nuts & nut products 360 1 1 100.0%Fresh vegetables (sprouts) 390 35 4 11.4%Dried/dehyrdated vegetables 420 2 0 0.0%Cured and processed vegetab 430 5 0 0.0%A l id 30 1 0 0 0%Apple cider 530 1 0 0.0%
Multiple food combinationsSandwiches/salads/dips 450 70 0 0.0%
Apple cider 530 1 0 0.0%
Multiple food combinationsSandwiches/salads/dips 450 70 0 0.0%
453 50 1 2.0%459 2 0 0.0%
Total 171 6 3.5%
453 50 1 2.0%459 2 0 0.0%
Total 171 6 3.5%
Note: Apples, dried fruit, fruit products, grapes, jams/jellies, lettuce, maple syrup, onions, and potatoes were included in the search, but none were tested in the time period surveyed.
Why do we eat sprouts?Why do we eat sprouts?Why do we eat sprouts?Why do we eat sprouts?• Ancient Chinese physicians recognized and prescribed • Ancient Chinese physicians recognized and prescribed p y g p
sprouts for curing many disorders over 5,000 years ago.
• Accounts of sprouting appear in the Bible in the Book of
p y g psprouts for curing many disorders over 5,000 years ago.
• Accounts of sprouting appear in the Bible in the Book ofAccounts of sprouting appear in the Bible in the Book of Daniel.
• Sailors in the 1700s were riddled by scurvy (lack of
Accounts of sprouting appear in the Bible in the Book of Daniel.
• Sailors in the 1700s were riddled by scurvy (lack of• Sailors in the 1700s were riddled by scurvy (lack of Vitamin C) and consumed limes, lemons and varieties of sprouts (all abundant holders of Vitamin C), plus other fresh fruits and vegetables to protect the sailors’ health.
• Sailors in the 1700s were riddled by scurvy (lack of Vitamin C) and consumed limes, lemons and varieties of sprouts (all abundant holders of Vitamin C), plus other fresh fruits and vegetables to protect the sailors’ health.g p
• More recently, sprouts have been shown to be rich in substances that promote antioxidant activity and may
g p
• More recently, sprouts have been shown to be rich in substances that promote antioxidant activity and maysubstances that promote antioxidant activity and may offer cancer protection.substances that promote antioxidant activity and may offer cancer protection.
Cluster InvestigationCluster InvestigationCluster Investigation 2008 09
Cluster Investigation 2008 092008-092008-09
PulseNet Listeria data (2008)PulseNet Listeria data (2008)PulseNet Listeria data (2008)PulseNet Listeria data (2008)
S FSource Frequency
Human 522
Unknown 21
Food 256Food 256
Environmental 234
O 1033TOTAL 1033
Source: CDC national PulseNet data, Northeast Regional Working Group Project
Timeline of eventsTimeline of eventsTimeline of eventsTimeline of events• 1997-2006
GX6A16 0282 t d 14 ti• 1997-2006
GX6A16 0282 t d 14 ti– GX6A16.0282 reported 14 times
• March 2008-March 2009
– GX6A16.0282 reported 14 times
• March 2008-March 2009• March 2008-March 2009– 20 cases of listeriosis
I di ti i h bl A I d A I PFGE
• March 2008-March 2009– 20 cases of listeriosis
I di ti i h bl A I d A I PFGE– Indistinguishable AscI and ApaI PFGE patternsCA (1) MA(6) NY(6) NJ(4) MD(1)
– Indistinguishable AscI and ApaI PFGE patternsCA (1) MA(6) NY(6) NJ(4) MD(1)– CA (1), MA(6), NY(6); NJ(4); MD(1); ME(1); NH(1)T t t l l t
– CA (1), MA(6), NY(6); NJ(4); MD(1); ME(1); NH(1)T t t l l t– Two separate temporal clusters; some cases not in obvious clusters
– Two separate temporal clusters; some cases not in obvious clusters
Temporal Distribution of GX6A16 0282 (199 2009)Temporal Distribution of GX6A16 0282 (199 2009)GX6A16.0282 (1997-2009)GX6A16.0282 (1997-2009)
9
6
8
7
8
4
6
4
54
2
1
2 23
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2
1
0
1997
-01-
3120
01-1
0-31
2002
-06-
0320
02-0
8-21
2002
-12-
1320
04-0
2-12
2006
-04-
1220
08-0
4-11
2008
-05-
2920
08-0
6-16
2008
-08-
0120
08-0
8-08
2008
-08-
1520
08-0
8-28
2008
-09-
1020
08-0
9-16
2008
-09-
1820
08-1
0-07
2008
-11-
1720
08-1
1-20
2008
-12-
1620
09-0
1-13
2009
-01-
2320
09-0
3-06
2009
-03-
1820
09-0
3-26
2009
-03-
3020
09-0
3-31
2009
-04-
0620
09-0
4-16
2009
-04-
1720
09-0
4-21
2009
-04-
2420
09-0
4-27
2009
-04-
3020
09-0
5-19
UploadDate
Patient DemographicsPatient DemographicsPatient DemographicsPatient Demographics• Age range: 20 89 years• Age range: 20 89 years• Age range: 20–89 years• Age range: 20–89 years
• 65% are female – 21% were pregnant at the time of infection
• 65% are female – 21% were pregnant at the time of infection
• All twenty patients were hospitalized for• All twenty patients were hospitalized forAll twenty patients were hospitalized for their illnesses. All twenty patients were hospitalized for their illnesses.
Link to Food Sample?Link to Food Sample?Link to Food Sample?Link to Food Sample?
• On April 6 2009 New York State Department of• On April 6 2009 New York State Department of• On April 6, 2009, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets uploaded an isolate of Listeria monocytogenes from alfalfa sprouts that
• On April 6, 2009, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets uploaded an isolate of Listeria monocytogenes from alfalfa sprouts that y g pwas indistinguishable from the outbreak strain.
y g pwas indistinguishable from the outbreak strain.
• The isolate was from a sprout sample that was collected through routine surveillance from a
• The isolate was from a sprout sample that was collected through routine surveillance from a supermarket distributor in New York and was produced by Producer A in Bridgeport, CT. supermarket distributor in New York and was produced by Producer A in Bridgeport, CT.
Patient InterviewsPatient InterviewsPatient InterviewsPatient Interviews
• 10 patients were interviewed with• 10 patients were interviewed with• 10 patients were interviewed with questions regarding sprout
i
• 10 patients were interviewed with questions regarding sprout
iconsumption– four reported sprout consumptionconsumption– four reported sprout consumptionp p p– three were unsure of sprout
consumption
p p p– three were unsure of sprout
consumptionconsumption– three denied any sprout consumption.
consumption– three denied any sprout consumption.
InspectionInspectionInspectionInspection• Investigators from the CT Department of
Agriculture and FDA inspected the growing firm• Investigators from the CT Department of
Agriculture and FDA inspected the growing firmAgriculture and FDA inspected the growing firm
• They collected environmental samples and food
Agriculture and FDA inspected the growing firm
• They collected environmental samples and foodThey collected environmental samples and food products for testing.
Th tb k t i f d i lf lf t
They collected environmental samples and food products for testing.
Th tb k t i f d i lf lf t• The outbreak strain was found in alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, sprout blends environmental swabs and multiple environmental locations (e.g.
• The outbreak strain was found in alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, sprout blends environmental swabs and multiple environmental locations (e.g. p ( ga growing trench, spent irrigation water, etc) collected in the plant.
p ( ga growing trench, spent irrigation water, etc) collected in the plant.
• One additional follow-up sample by NYSDAM was also found to contain the outbreak strain.
• One additional follow-up sample by NYSDAM was also found to contain the outbreak strain.
Dice (Opt:1.50%) (Tol 1.5%-1.5%) (H>0.0% S>0.0%) [0.0%-100.0%]PFGE-AscI
100
9896PFGE-AscI
20.0
0
40.0
0
100.
00
150.
00
200.
00
250.
00
300.
00
350.
00
400.
00
500.
00
600.
00
2000
1.0
0E4
5.0
0E4
PFGE-ApaI
20.0
0
40.0
0
100.
00
150.
00
200.
00
250.
00
300.
00
350.
00
400.
00
500.
00
600.
00
2000
1.0
0E4
5.0
0E4
Key
CT___02033917
CT___02033918
CT___02033919
CT___02033920
CT___02033921
SourceSta
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
SourceSite
Alfalfa Sprouts
Alfalfa Sprouts
Alfalfa Sprouts
Alfalfa Sprouts
Alfalfa Sprouts
SourceType
Food
Food
Food
Food
Food
CT___02033931
CT___02033933
MA___08PF0425
MA___08PF1182
MA___08PF1521
MA___08PF1749
MA___08PF2122
MA___09PF0297
NH___2008027278
CT
CT
MA
MA
NJ
CA
NJ
NJ
NH
Factory swab
Alfalfa Sprouts
BLOOD
BLOOD (SUBCULTURE)
BLOOD
blood
BLOOD
Blood
blood
Environmental
Food
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human, food, and environmental
Human, food, and environmental
NY___BAC0800002720
NY___BAC0900001363
MA___08PF1952
FCF__507437-1
FCF__507437-3
FCF__507437-4
FCF__507437-7
FCF__507438-1
FCF__507438-5
NY
NY
MA
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
Amniotic fluid
Blood
Spent irriagation water
Spent irriagation water
Spent irriagation water
Spent irriagation water
Alfalfa sprouts
Alfalfa sprouts
Human
Human
Human
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Food
Food
AscI & ApaIPatterns
AscI & ApaIPatterns
FCF__507439-1
FCF__507439-7
FCF__507442-106
FCF__507442-11
FCF__507442-16
FCF__507442-2
FCF__507442-21
FCF__507442-57
FCF 507442-68
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
Alfalfa sprouts
Alfalfa sprouts
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
Food
Food
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
Environmental
EnvironmentalFCF__507442 68
FCF__507442-93
FCF__507443
FCF__507443-1b
FCF__524837-1
FCF__524837-4
FCF__524838-3
FCF__524838-7
FCF__524839-1
FCF 524839 2
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
Environmental Swab
Environmental Swab
alfalfa/clover sprouts in l.
alfalfa/clover sprouts in l.
Spicy Sprout Blend
Spicy Sprout Blend
Clover Sprouts
Clover Sprouts
Broccosprouts
Broccosprouts
Environmental
Environmental
Food
Food
Food
Food
Food
Food
Food
FoodFCF__524839-2
FCF__524840-10
FCF__524840-2
FCF__524844
MA___08PF1125
MA___08PF1323
MA___09PF0062
MA___09PF0331
MA___09PF0345
CT
CT
CT
CT
MA
ME
MA
NJ
MA
Broccosprouts
BroccoSprout Blend
BroccoSprout Blend
Crunchy Sprout Blend
SPINAL FLUID
BLOOD
BLOOD
Blood
Blood
Food
Food
Food
Food
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
MD___MDA08223487
NY___BAC0900000221
NYAG_09B02865A-1
NYAG_09B02866A-6
NYAG_NYAG09B0232.
NYC__nyc08-100647716
NYC__nyc09-100753729
NY___BAC0800004932
MD
NY
NY
NY
CT
NY
NY
NY
Blood
Alfalfa Sprouts
Clover Sprouts
Alfalfa Sprouts
Blood
Human
Human
Food
Food
Food
Human
Human
Human
Regulatory ActionRegulatory ActionRegulatory ActionRegulatory Action• On April 9 2009 a voluntary recall of• On April 9 2009 a voluntary recall of• On April 9, 2009, a voluntary recall of
alfalfa and other sprout products was issued
• On April 9, 2009, a voluntary recall of alfalfa and other sprout products was issuedissued.issued.
• Sprout production halted.• Sprout production halted.
• On April 23, 2009, list of recalled products was expanded
• On April 23, 2009, list of recalled products was expandedwas expanded.was expanded.
SummarySummarySummarySummary• This is the first reported outbreak of human
listeriosis from sprouts• This is the first reported outbreak of human
listeriosis from sproutslisteriosis from sprouts.
• In this investigation a single routine
listeriosis from sprouts.
• In this investigation a single routine• In this investigation, a single routine surevillance sample helped identify the source of the outbreak
• In this investigation, a single routine surevillance sample helped identify the source of the outbreak
• Some indication that for Listeria the window for l t i h ld b l th 120
• Some indication that for Listeria the window for l t i h ld b l th 120cluster scanning should be larger than 120
days.cluster scanning should be larger than 120 days.
SummarySummarySummarySummary• Both health departments and regulatory
agencies can make significant contributions to• Both health departments and regulatory
agencies can make significant contributions toagencies can make significant contributions to outbreak investigations.agencies can make significant contributions to outbreak investigations.
• Regulatory agencies have responsibilities and resources that allow for;
• Regulatory agencies have responsibilities and resources that allow for;– Rapid trace back of product from retail to suppliers– Verification procedures for ensuring that recalled
food has been removed from store shelves
– Rapid trace back of product from retail to suppliers– Verification procedures for ensuring that recalled
food has been removed from store shelvesfood has been removed from store shelves– Enhanced laboratory surge capacity and matrix
familiarity for screening of foodborne pathogens
food has been removed from store shelves– Enhanced laboratory surge capacity and matrix
familiarity for screening of foodborne pathogens
Another sprout outbreak?Another sprout outbreak?Another sprout outbreak?Another sprout outbreak?• Producer B in MA with multiple food and• Producer B in MA with multiple food and• Producer B in MA with multiple food and
environmental isolates with an indistinguishable pattern to recent human
• Producer B in MA with multiple food and environmental isolates with an indistinguishable pattern to recent humanindistinguishable pattern to recent human cases.indistinguishable pattern to recent human cases.
• Current cluster under investigation and epi • Current cluster under investigation and epi follow-up.follow-up.
Chang Farms Isolates:Chang Farms Isolates:Chang Farms Isolates:08B00801A-1 collected 1/28/0809B04443A-1 collected 5/14/09
Chang Farms Isolates:08B00801A-1 collected 1/28/0809B04443A-1 collected 5/14/0909B04443A 1 collected 5/14/0909B04443A 1 collected 5/14/09
PFGE-ApaI
20.0
0
40.0
0
100.
00
120
.00
150.
00
200.
00
250.
00
300
.00
350.
00
400.
00
500.
00
600
.00
2000
1.0
0E4
5.0
0E4
PFGE-AscI
20.0
0
40.0
0
100
.00
120
.00
150.
00
200.
00
250
.00
300.
00
350.
00
400.
00
500.
00
600.
00
200
0
1.0
0E4
5.0
0E4
08B00801A 1 N Y k B S t F d P d08B00801A-109B04443A-1
New YorkNew York
Bean SproutsBean Sprouts
FoodFood
ProduceProduce
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsState and local
Stacey Kinney, Connecticut Dept of HealthState and local
Stacey Kinney, Connecticut Dept of HealthNew York State Dept. of Health
New York State Dept. of Agriculture & MarketsNew York City Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene
New York State Dept. of HealthNew York State Dept. of Agriculture & Markets
New York City Dept. of Health and Mental HygieneVermont Dept. of Health
New Hampshire Dept. of Healthand others!
Vermont Dept. of HealthNew Hampshire Dept. of Health
and others!
CDCMatthew Biggerstaff
CDCMatthew Biggerstaffgg
Lewis Graves
FDA
ggLewis Graves
FDAPaul Morin
Christine KeysDavid Melka
Paul MorinChristine KeysDavid Melka