+ All Categories
Home > Documents > overcrowding in the visitor experience: To define ways to...

overcrowding in the visitor experience: To define ways to...

Date post: 24-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Climber’s Perceptions on Mount Everest: Measuring Crowding Issues, Challenges, Success, and Environmental Issues Sources: AdventureStats. 2007. http://www.adventurestats.com/tables/EverestAgeFat.shtml, Salisbury, R. 2007. The Himalayan Database: The Expedition Archives of Elizabeth Hawley. A crowded Hillary Step. Photo: Eric Alexander Camp IV, South Col. Photo: Paul Adler Poster Background Photo: Jon Kedrowski Jon Kedrowski Research Proposal Department of Geography, Texas State UniversitySan Marcos, TX Photo: dailygalaxy.com Goals To examine the visitor experience in association with overcrowding and subsequent climber’s perception of risk and challenges on Mount Everest. To define ways to address the specifics of the overcrowding in the visitor experience: natural hazards on the standard routes. crowding high crimes(Kodas 2008). environmental issues. definitions of ‘success’ and ‘summit fever’. Research Objectives Develop new knowledge about the different demographic backgrounds, visitor experiences and perception of inherent risks associated with a typical summit attempt of the highest mountain on Earth. Utilize a surveying technique to gauge the overall impressions of climbers from a typical season of expeditions. Enhance understanding as to how the visitor experience to Mount Everest is perceived and how it can be improved so that risk to all who venture there (as well as damage to the surrounding environment) can be lowered and managed by the various stakeholders involved. Conceptual Framework of Survey THED Degradation ScenarioChange in Risk & Challenge Perceptions Summit FeverMount Everest Overcrowding Risk Taking BeforeDuringAfterDefinition of Successon Everest Ethical Mountaineering Climber Demographic Backgrounds Unethical Mountaineering Background Theory of Himalayan Environmental Degradation (THED) (Ives 1987, 1989). Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park ‘degradation scenario’ (Byers 2005) verified by prior research (Byers 1987a, 1987b, 1987c, 1997, Fisher 1990, Brower 1991, Stevens 1993, 1997, Brower and Dennis 1998). Mountaineering “Summit Fever” on Mt. Everest has an indirect ripple effect on both the THED and ‘degradation scenario’. ‘Highest peak phenomenon’ = increasing issues (Kodas 2008). Mount Everest Summits Since 1975 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Year Summits Summits Mount Everest Deaths Since 1975 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Year Fatalities Deaths Sources: AdventureStats. 2007. http://www.adventurestats.com/tables/EverestAgeFat.shtml, Salisbury, R. 2007. The Himalayan Database: The Expedition Archives of Elizabeth Hawley. Acknowledgements Thanks to Texas State UniversitySan Marcos Graduate College and Department of Geography for providing partial funding for Cryosphere & Hazards 2008 Workshop attendance and presentation. Special thanks to the Mountain Research Initiative (MRI), The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), and the conference selection committee at the University of Nebraska-Omaha who provided partial funding for trip support, transportation, and Cryosphere & Hazards 2008 Workshop attendance. David R. Butler, Ph.D., Texas State University, Advisor and Chair of Dissertation Committee. References Breivik, G. 1996. Personality, sensation seeking and risk taking among Everest climbers. International Journal of Sport Psychology 27: 308-320. Brower, B. 1991. Sherpa of Khumbu: People, Livestock, and Landscape. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 202 p. Brower, B., Dennis, A. 1998. Grazing the forest, shaping the landscape? Continuing the debate about forest dynamics in Sagarmatha National Park. In Nature’s Geography: New Lessons for Conservation in Developing Countries, ed. K. S. Zimmerer and K. S. Young, 184213. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Burke, S., Orlick, T. 2003. Mental strategies of elite Mount Everest climbers. Journal of Excellence 8: 42-58. Byers, A. C. 1987a. An assessment of landscape change in the Khumbu Region of Nepal using repeat photography. Mountain Research and Development 7(1): 7781. Byers, A.C. 1987b. A geoecological study of landscape change and man-accelerated soil loss: the case of the Sagarmatha (Mt.Everest) National Park, Khumbu, Nepal. PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International. Byers, A.C. 1987c. Landscape change and man-accelerated soil loss: The case of Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 7(3): 209216. Byers, A.C. 1997. Landscape change in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Himalayan Research Bulletin XVII :(2). Special issue: SoluKhumbu and the Sherpa. Byers, A.C. 2005. Contemporary human impacts on alpine ecosystems in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Khumbu, Nepal. Annals of Association of American Geographers 95(1): 112-140. Delle Fave, A., Bassi, M., Massimini, F. 2003. Quality of experience and risk perception in high-altitude rock climbing. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 15(1): 82-98. Ewert, A.W. 1985. Why people climb: the relationship of participant motives and experience level to mountaineering. Journal of Leisure Research 17: 241-250. Ewert, A.W. 1991. Managing a scarce natural resource: the high-altitude mountaineering setting. In: Proceedings of the International Conference and Workshop Summaries Book of the International Association for Experiential Education (19 th , Lake Junaluska, NC, Oct. 24-27, 1991), 131-136. Ewert, A.W. 1994. Playing the edge: motivation and risk taking in a high-altitude wildernesslike environment. Environment and Behavior 26(1): 3-24. Fisher, J. F. 1990. Sherpas: Reflections on Change in Himalayan Nepal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 205 p. Kodas, M. 2008. High Crimes: The Fate of Everest in an Age of Greed. New York: Hyperion, 372 p. Stevens, S. F. 1993. Claiming High Ground: Sherpas, Subsistence, and Environmental Change in the Highest Himalaya. Berkeley: University of California Press, 540 p. Stevens, S.F. 1997. (ed.) Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC: Island Press, 361 p. Research Questions 1. What factors have a significant effect on the mountain climber’s perception, including fears and challenges encountered on Mount Everest during all phases of an expedition? 2. What is the relationship of success versus overall climbing experience on Mount Everest? In addition, what actually constitutes true ‘success’ on Everest? Research Questions (cont.) 3. Are the levels of crowding and environmental degradation within acceptable limits for the Everest climbers? 4. What are major similarities and differences within the Everest climber demographics regarding questions #1 ,#2, & #3? 5. What are some feasible solutions to critical concepts based on the climbers and their responses? Methodology 40-item questionnaire administered on site for all three phases of the expedition: —“Before”, “during”, “after”. Survey organization by the following categories: Climber demographics Prior experience and expertise Perceptions of fears/challenges encountered Over-crowding and environmental concerns Methodology (Cont.) Following Data Collection: 1. Experience and Skill Level Analysis. 2. Factors Affecting Climbers Perceptions. 3. Rank Correlation Analysis of Overcrowding Issues. 4. Critical Concept Analysis. 5. Discussion of Solutions for Survey Results. South Standard Route: Everest Basecamp, Nepal, at the base of the Khumbu Icefall (17,575’/5357m). North Standard Route: Everest Basecamp, Tibet, at the head of the Rongbuk Glacier (16,400’/5000m). Study Area Locations Background (cont.) Visitor experience in mountaineering is only moderately documented. Relationships between climber’s motives and levels of experience (Ewert 1985, 1994). Overcrowding and environmental quality within acceptable limits (Ewert 1991). Himalayas: quality of experience and risk perception (Breivik 1996, Delle Fave et al. 2003), defining mental strategies and relationship to success (Burke & Orlick 2003). Photo: NASA Images Photo: Paul Auerbach, M.D. Nepal Basecamp5357m Significance From a geographer’s perspective: Variables comprising important components of ‘summit fever’ will be isolated Demographics of climbers and the relationships drawn from specific issues on Everest escalated by the overcrowding will be analyzed by examining perceptions Critical concepts will also be related to the overcrowding concerns (environmental, cultural, economical, political) and conclusions may be drawn Near Tibet Basecamp5000m Road leading into Everest BC. Photo: Jo Singh Conclusions Focused innovations of the project include: 1. Explanation and geographic assessment of climber demographics: who the climbers are, where they are from, and what brings them to climb Everest. 2. Evaluation of the mountaineering experience, expertise, and skill level of climbers on Mount Everest to determine how qualified the climbers actually are (prior to the climb), and then determine how experienced the climbers themselves think they should be in order to climb the peak. 3. A probabilistic view of factors affecting climber’s perceptions of mountaineering on a high peak within the temporal aspects of a climbing expedition (‘before’, ‘during’, and ‘after’). Conclusions (Cont.) Project innovations (cont.): 4. A site-specific and detailed location determination of the overcrowding and environmental problems on the highest mountain in the world. 5. Popular critical concepts addressed in regards to associated challenges on the mountain that may be applied to other mountains as well. 6. Valuable insight for the Nepalese and Tibetan governments to help manage the permit systems and mitigate escalating problems on Mount Everest. FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 2008 2009 2010 2011 SUMMER & FALL SPRING SUMMER FALL SPRING SUMMER FALL SPRING SUMMER Pilot Study Initial Data Review Logistics & Planning for South Col Side (NEPAL) South Col Survey Finalized Acquisition of Data via Survey (Everest BC, NEPAL) Everest Climb South Col Route South Col Data Analysis Experience & Skill Level Analysis Climbers Perception & Overcrowding Analysis Logistics & Planning for North Col Side (TIBET) Begin Dissertation Report Oral Report (Dissertation Defense) Dissertation Final Submission (South Col Only) North Col Survey Finalized IRB Approval Acquisition of Data via Survey (Everest BC, TIBET) Everest Climb North Col Route North Col Data Analysis Experience & Skill Level Analysis Climbers Perception & Overcrowding Analysis Oral Report (North Col Only) Comparative Analysis (North & South Combined) Oral Report Begin Final Reports & Book Project Timeline Gaps in Literature Awareness of “Summit Fever” by the Everest climbing community on specific issues (examined across the climber demographics): Overcrowding on all aspects of an Expedition “Before”, “during” and “after” perceptions Assessing specific locations where crowding is a problem Critical Concepts Definition of success for today’s Everest climber Environmental/human ethics shaping quality of visitor experience Trash & discarded oxygen bottles litter Camp IV, South Col Photo: Mike Richard Everest: a very crowded mountain. Photo: Dariusz Zaluski Kedrowski ©2008
Transcript
Page 1: overcrowding in the visitor experience: To define ways to ...gato-docs.its.txstate.edu/jcr:de214bb7-dc18-429a-918a-4061539445… · Dissertation Final Submission (South Col Only)

Climber’s Perceptions on Mount Everest: Measuring Crowding

Issues, Challenges, Success, and Environmental Issues

Sources: AdventureStats. 2007. http://www.adventurestats.com/tables/EverestAgeFat.shtml,

Salisbury, R. 2007. The Himalayan Database: The Expedition Archives of Elizabeth Hawley.

A crowded Hillary Step. Photo: Eric AlexanderCamp IV, South Col. Photo: Paul Adler

Poster Background Photo: Jon Kedrowski

Jon Kedrowski

Research Proposal

Department of Geography, Texas State University—San Marcos, TXPhoto: dailygalaxy.com

Goals

• To examine the visitor experience in association with overcrowding and subsequent climber’s perception of risk and challenges on Mount Everest.

• To define ways to address the specifics of the overcrowding in the visitor experience:• natural hazards on the standard routes.

• crowding ‘high crimes’ (Kodas 2008).

• environmental issues.

• definitions of ‘success’ and ‘summit fever’.

Research Objectives

• Develop new knowledge about the different demographic backgrounds, visitor experiences and perception of inherent risks associated with a typical summit attempt of the highest mountain on Earth.

• Utilize a surveying technique to gauge the overall impressions of climbers from a typical season of expeditions.

• Enhance understanding as to how the visitor experience to Mount Everest is perceived and how it can be improved so that risk to all who venture there (as well as damage to the surrounding environment) can be lowered and managed by the various stakeholders involved.

Conceptual Framework of Survey

THED

“Degradation Scenario”

Change in

Risk &

Challenge

Perceptions

“Summit Fever”

Mount Everest

Overcrowding Risk

Taking

“Before”

“During”

“After”

Definition of

„Success‟ on

Everest Ethical

Mountaineering

Climber Demographic

Backgrounds

Unethical

Mountaineering

Background

• Theory of Himalayan Environmental Degradation (THED) (Ives 1987, 1989).

• Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park ‘degradation scenario’ (Byers 2005) verified by prior research (Byers 1987a, 1987b, 1987c, 1997, Fisher 1990, Brower 1991, Stevens 1993, 1997, Brower and Dennis 1998).

• Mountaineering “Summit Fever” on Mt. Everest has an indirect ripple effect on both the THED and ‘degradation scenario’.

• ‘Highest peak phenomenon’ = increasing issues (Kodas 2008).

Mount Everest Summits Since 1975

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

19

75

19

77

19

79

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

Year

Su

mm

its

Summits

Mount Everest Deaths Since 1975

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Year

Fata

liti

es

Deaths

Sources: AdventureStats. 2007. http://www.adventurestats.com/tables/EverestAgeFat.shtml,

Salisbury, R. 2007. The Himalayan Database: The Expedition Archives of Elizabeth Hawley.

Acknowledgements• Thanks to Texas State University—San Marcos Graduate College and Department of Geography for providing

partial funding for Cryosphere & Hazards 2008 Workshop attendance and presentation.

• Special thanks to the Mountain Research Initiative (MRI), The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), and the conference selection committee at the University of Nebraska-Omaha who provided partial funding for trip support, transportation, and Cryosphere & Hazards 2008 Workshop attendance.

• David R. Butler, Ph.D., Texas State University, Advisor and Chair of Dissertation Committee.

ReferencesBreivik, G. 1996. Personality, sensation seeking and risk taking among Everest climbers. International Journal of Sport Psychology 27: 308-320.

Brower, B. 1991. Sherpa of Khumbu: People, Livestock, and Landscape. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 202 p.

Brower, B., Dennis, A. 1998. Grazing the forest, shaping the landscape? Continuing the debate about forest dynamics in Sagarmatha National Park. In

Nature’s Geography: New Lessons for Conservation in Developing Countries, ed. K. S. Zimmerer and K. S. Young, 184–213. Madison: University of

Wisconsin Press.

Burke, S., Orlick, T. 2003. Mental strategies of elite Mount Everest climbers. Journal of Excellence 8: 42-58.

Byers, A. C. 1987a. An assessment of landscape change in the Khumbu Region of Nepal using repeat photography. Mountain Research and Development 7(1):

77–81.

Byers, A.C. 1987b. A geoecological study of landscape change and man-accelerated soil loss: the case of the Sagarmatha (Mt.Everest) National

Park, Khumbu, Nepal. PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.

Byers, A.C. 1987c. Landscape change and man-accelerated soil loss: The case of Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Mountain Research and

Development 7(3): 209–216.

Byers, A.C. 1997. Landscape change in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Himalayan Research Bulletin XVII :(2). Special issue: SoluKhumbu

and the Sherpa.

Byers, A.C. 2005. Contemporary human impacts on alpine ecosystems in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Khumbu, Nepal. Annals of Association of

American Geographers 95(1): 112-140.

Delle Fave, A., Bassi, M., Massimini, F. 2003. Quality of experience and risk perception in high-altitude rock climbing. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

15(1): 82-98.

Ewert, A.W. 1985. Why people climb: the relationship of participant motives and experience level to mountaineering. Journal of Leisure Research 17: 241-250.

Ewert, A.W. 1991. Managing a scarce natural resource: the high-altitude mountaineering setting. In: Proceedings of the International Conference and Workshop

Summaries Book of the International Association for Experiential Education (19th, Lake Junaluska, NC, Oct. 24-27, 1991), 131-136.

Ewert, A.W. 1994. Playing the edge: motivation and risk taking in a high-altitude wildernesslike environment. Environment and Behavior 26(1): 3-24.

Fisher, J. F. 1990. Sherpas: Reflections on Change in Himalayan Nepal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 205 p.

Kodas, M. 2008. High Crimes: The Fate of Everest in an Age of Greed. New York: Hyperion, 372 p.

Stevens, S. F. 1993. Claiming High Ground: Sherpas, Subsistence, and Environmental Change in the Highest Himalaya. Berkeley: University of California

Press, 540 p.

Stevens, S.F. 1997. (ed.) Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC: Island Press, 361 p.

Research Questions

1. What factors have a significant effect on the mountain climber’s perception, including fears and challenges encountered on Mount Everest during all phases of an expedition?

2. What is the relationship of success versus overall climbing experience on Mount Everest? In addition, what actually constitutes true ‘success’ on Everest?

Research Questions (cont.)

3. Are the levels of crowding and environmental degradation within acceptable limits for the Everest climbers?

4. What are major similarities and differences within the Everest climber demographics regarding questions #1 ,#2, & #3?

5. What are some feasible solutions to critical concepts based on the climbers and their responses?

Methodology

• 40-item questionnaire administered on site for all three phases of the expedition:—“Before”, “during”, “after”.

• Survey organization by the following categories:—Climber demographics

—Prior experience and expertise

—Perceptions of fears/challenges encountered

—Over-crowding and environmental concerns

Methodology (Cont.)

Following Data Collection:

1. Experience and Skill Level Analysis.

2. Factors Affecting Climbers Perceptions.

3. Rank Correlation Analysis of Overcrowding Issues.

4. Critical Concept Analysis.

5. Discussion of Solutions for Survey Results.

South Standard Route: Everest Basecamp, Nepal, at the

base of the Khumbu Icefall

(17,575’/5357m).

North Standard Route:Everest Basecamp, Tibet, at the

head of the Rongbuk Glacier

(16,400’/5000m).

Study Area LocationsBackground (cont.)

• Visitor experience in mountaineering is only moderately documented.

– Relationships between climber’s motives and levels of experience (Ewert 1985, 1994).

– Overcrowding and environmental quality within acceptable limits (Ewert 1991).

– Himalayas: quality of experience and risk perception (Breivik 1996, Delle Fave et al. 2003), defining mental strategies and relationship to success (Burke

& Orlick 2003).

Photo: NASA Images

Photo: Paul Auerbach, M.D.

Nepal Basecamp—5357m

Significance

• From a geographer’s perspective:

– Variables comprising important components of ‘summit fever’ will be isolated

– Demographics of climbers and the relationships drawn from specific issues on Everest escalated by the overcrowding will be analyzed by examining perceptions

– Critical concepts will also be related to the overcrowding concerns (environmental, cultural, economical, political) and conclusions may be drawn

Near Tibet Basecamp—5000m

Road leading into Everest BC. Photo: Jo Singh

Conclusions

Focused innovations of the project include:1. Explanation and geographic assessment of climber demographics: who the climbers are, where they are from, and what brings them to climb Everest.2. Evaluation of the mountaineering experience, expertise, and skill level of climbers on Mount Everest to determine how qualified the climbers actually are (prior to the climb), and then determine how experienced the climbers themselves think they should be in order to climb the peak.3. A probabilistic view of factors affecting climber’s perceptions of mountaineering on a high peak within the temporal aspects of a climbing expedition (‘before’, ‘during’, and ‘after’).

Conclusions (Cont.)

Project innovations (cont.):

4. A site-specific and detailed location determination of the overcrowding and environmental problems on the highest mountain in the world.

5. Popular critical concepts addressed in regards to associated challenges on the mountain that may be applied to other mountains as well.

6. Valuable insight for the Nepalese and Tibetan governments to help manage the permit systems and mitigate escalating problems on Mount Everest.

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

2008 2009 2010 2011

SUMMER

& FALL

SPRING

SUMMER

FALL

SPRING

SUMMER

FALL

SPRING

SUMMER

Pilot

Study

Initial

Data

Review

Logistics & Planning for

South Col Side

(NEPAL)

South Col

Survey

Finalized

Acquisition of Data via Survey

(Everest BC,

NEPAL)

Everest Climb

South Col

Route

South Col Data Analysis

Experience &

Skill Level

Analysis

Climbers Perception &

Overcrowding

Analysis

Logistics & Planning for

North Col Side

(TIBET)

Begin Dissertation

Report

Oral Report (Dissertation

Defense)

Dissertation Final Submission

(South Col Only)

North Col Survey

Finalized IRB

Approval

Acquisition of Data via Survey

(Everest BC,

TIBET)

Everest Climb

North Col

Route

North Col Data Analysis

Experience &

Skill Level

Analysis

Climbers Perception &

Overcrowding

Analysis

Oral Report (North Col

Only)

Comparative

Analysis

(North & South

Combined)

Oral

Report

Begin Final

Reports

& Book

Project TimelineGaps in Literature

• Awareness of “Summit Fever” by the Everest climbing community on specific issues (examined across the climber demographics):

– Overcrowding on all aspects of an Expedition

• “Before”, “during” and “after” perceptions

• Assessing specific locations where crowding is a problem

— Critical Concepts

• Definition of success for today’s Everest climber

• Environmental/human ethics shaping quality of visitor experience

Trash & discarded

oxygen bottles

litter Camp IV, South Col

Photo: Mike Richard

Everest: a very crowded mountain. Photo: Dariusz Zaluski

Kedrowski ©2008

Recommended