+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Overview of a School Finance Plan That Makes Sense for Freeman... · as high as the level available...

Overview of a School Finance Plan That Makes Sense for Freeman... · as high as the level available...

Date post: 19-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: nguyendung
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
39
Overview of a School Finance Plan That Makes Sense for Everyone An Equity Center Presentation to the Education Service Center Region 1 Finance Advisory Council February 23, 2018
Transcript

Overview of a School Finance Plan That Makes Sense for Everyone

An Equity Center Presentation to the

Education Service Center Region 1 Finance Advisory CouncilFebruary 23, 2018 

The Plan is a Starting Point that does the following:

• Simplifies calculations so that everyone can easily understand how it works

• Removes waste and other inefficiencies so that we bring every education dollar to bear on every child’s educational opportunities, in accordance with his or her needs, and those opportunities are as good in your district as the state system makes available to any other district

• Treats taxpayers fairly so that the funding level available in your district is as high as the level available to any other district willing to levy the same tax rate

• Removes the root causes of divisiveness among districts

• Makes adequate funding achievable

2/23/2018 Equity Center 2

The Plan is based on these basic elements

• All districts are funded alike• All school funding elements are in Chapter 42• No funding elements in Chapter 41• There are NO Chapter 41 and 42 districts

• One Basic Allotment for everyone – AND it applies to all pennies of tax rate from $0.01 through $1.17

• There is only one tier, with all 117 pennies funded at the same level• No Guaranteed Levels• No Equalized Wealth Levels• No Tier 2, Golden or Copper Pennies

2/23/2018 Equity Center 3

The Plan is based on these basic elements

• No prior year value surprises or inequities• Guaranteed revenue – no tax collections surprises• WADA is calculated by a much simpler formula

• No funding is determined by WADA calculations• WADA is only used for equity measurements

• Collections do not determine funding• It is a stable system based on the needed funding level, not the state of a district’s economy

• No convoluted recapture calculations that no one understands• Everyone treated the same for ASF Per‐Capita and Transportation

2/23/2018 Equity Center 4

Calculating a District’s Basic Allotment

Current Law• Statutory BA = $5,140Assume Compressed Tax Rate of $0.90

Calculation:Lesser of 5,140, or5,140 * .90, which is 4,626(1,018 different Basic Allotments are possible)

New Plan• Higher Basic Allotment

• Savings are rolled into it

Calculation:None – Every district has the same Basic Allotment

2/23/2018 Equity Center 5

District Adjustments are retained, with two adjustments (see following slides)

1. Cost of Education Index – CEI – Applies to all districts2. Small District Adjustment – SDA – Less than 1,600 regular ADA

1. Greater than 300 square miles 2. Less than 300 square miles

3. Mid‐size District Adjustment – MSDA – Less than 5,000 regular ADA

2/23/2018 Equity Center 6

Simplifying the CEI Calculations Basic Allotment         Adjusted Basic AllotmentCurrent Law

Assume BA = $5,140; CEI = 1.10

Calculation:$5,140 * (1 + (0.100 * 0.710)) =$5,505 ABA

New PlanTEA changes every district’s CEI to reflect the 71% reduction.Old CEI = 1.10; new CEI = 1.071

Calculation:Basic Allotment* 1.071 = Adjusted Basic Allotment

*BA will be higher than $5,140 because of the savings

2/23/2018 Equity Center 7

Diseconomy of Scale Adjustment Calculations

• Three calculations become two• Small District Adjustment for all small districts for districts with more than 300 square miles

• Small District Adjustment for districts with less than 300 square miles• Mid‐size District Adjustment

2/23/2018 Equity Center 8

Categorical Aid10 Allotments reduced to 6 Allotments

1. Regular Program Allotment2. Special Education Allotment3. Career & Technology 

Allotment4. Gifted & Talented Allotment5. Compensatory Education 

Allotment

6. Bilingual Education Allotment7. Public Education Grant8. New Instructional Facility 

Allotment9. Transportation Allotment10. High School Allotment

2/23/2018 Equity Center

No changes were made to how the allotments are calculated.

9

Target Revenue

Tier 1 Collections

DTRs

Tier 2, Level 1 Guaranteed Level

You have enough complications in your life…why create unnecessary ones when you calculate revenue?

Compressed Tax Rates

Golden Pennies

Copper Pennies

Tier 2, Level 1

Tier 2, Level 2 Equalized Wealth 

Level

Tier 1 Equalized Wealth Level

WADA

Tier 2, Level 2

Tier 1

Multiple Basic Allotments

Austin Level

ASATR

Tier 1 Local Fund Assignment

Tier 1 Local Fund Assignment

2/23/2018

Wealth Hold‐Harmless

Tier 2

Tier 2, Level 2 Guaranteed Level

Tier 2 Level 1 Collections

Tier 2 Level 2Collections

Equity Center 10

Determining a District’s Funding Level

2/23/2018 Equity Center 11

Every District is Guaranteed Access to the Full Sum of its Allotments, plus Enrichment

Transportation

Regular Program

Special Education

Career & Technology

Compensatory EducationBilingual Education

Sum of all 5 Instructional Allotments

M&O Tax Effort (Adopted M&O Rate, 

adjusted by Local Option Homestead Exemption 

impact)

2/23/2018 Equity Center 12

Determine Funding Levels

• Assume, for ease of following the calculations, the sum of the five instructional allotments is $1,000,000 and the Transportation Allotment is $50,000.

Examples:(Sum of 5 Allotments x Tax Effort) + Transportation = Funding Level

$1,000,000 x 1.00 = $1,000,000 + $50,000$1,000,000 x 1.04 = $1,040,000 + $50,000 $1,000,000 x 0.96 = $960,000 + $50,000 $1,000,000 x 1.17 = $1,170,000 + $50,000

For every 1 cent increase (or decrease) in tax effort, funding increases (or decreases) by 1%

2/23/2018 Equity Center 13

Tax Rate vs. Tax Effort

• The Local Option Homestead Exemption exempts a portion of the taxable value of homesteads

• Two districts, exactly alike, both taxing at $1.04 are not making the same effort if one of the districts is exempting part of its taxable value from taxation

Tax Effort = M&O Tax Rate XTaxable value a District IS 

ENTITLED to tax

Taxable value a District CHOOSES to tax

2/23/2018 Equity Center 14

Sources of Funding

2/23/2018 Equity Center 15

State & Local Responsibilities

2/23/2018 Equity Center

Funding Amount at Chosen Tax 

Effort

State Share of M&O Funding

M&O Tax Collections 

Lower Wealth District Mid‐Wealth District

State Share of M&O Funding

M&O Tax Collections

ASF Per Capita ASF Per Capita

16

State & Local Responsibilities

2/23/2018 Equity Center

Funding Amount at Chosen Tax 

Effort

High Wealth District

M&O Tax Collections

ASF Per Capita

Sent to State

M&O Tax CollectionsRetained

ASF Per Capita

The portion of collections in excess of the 

Funding Amount is sent to the 

State. 

17

All Property Tax Collections Fund Public Education

• All increases in collections due to growth in district wealth must be spent on public education by covering student growth, increasing the Basic Allotment, increasing district adjustments and/or increasing allotment weights

• All increases in collections sent to the State must be used to increase the Basic Allotment

• These are both DRIVERS of school funding levels

2/23/2018 Equity Center 18

369

5729

501

30 32

$228,357$274,320

$1,092,849

$391,759

$998,593

$1,670,181

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

$200,000

$425,000

$650,000

$875,000

$1,100,000

$1,325,000

$1,550,000

$1,775,000

1.17 or above above 1.06 but lessthan 1.17

above 1.04 or equal to1.06

1.04 above 0.999 but lessthan 1.04

less than 1.00

FY  2017  SCHOOL  DISTRICT  ADOPTED  M&O  TAX  RATE  (ATR)  INFORMATION

Number of Districts Average Wealth per WADA

2/23/2018 Equity Center 19

$6,269 $6,251

$6,601

$6,022

$6,952

$7,068

$1.17

$1.12

$1.06

$1.04$1.02

$0.92

$0.900

$0.950

$1.000

$1.050

$1.100

$1.150

$1.200

$5,900

$6,100

$6,300

$6,500

$6,700

$6,900

$7,100

1.17 or above above 1.06 but lessthan 1.17

above 1.04 or equal to1.06

1.04 above 0.999 but lessthan 1.04

less than 1.00

FY  2017  SCHOOL  DISTRICT  REVENUE  PER  WADA/ADOPTED  M&O  TAX  RATE  (ATR)COMPARISON

Average Revenue per WADA Average ATR

2/23/2018 Equity Center 20

2/23/2018

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

$10,000

$11,000

$12,000

$0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.20 $1.25

FY 18 Revenue per WADA at Adopted M&O Tax RateTEA January 2018 DATA

$0.71 Tax Rate provides $9,883 per WADA

$1.24 Tax Rate provides $6,843 per WADA

58% of Tax Effort provides a $90,000 per Classroom advantage

Equity Center 21

$4,000

$4,500

$5,000

$5,500

$6,000

$6,500

$7,000

$0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.20 $1.25

Texas School Finance‐‐FY 18 on a Cost Based Formula‐‐BA $5,583Revenue per WADA Without Transportation

2/23/2018 Equity Center 22

$4,000

$4,500

$5,000

$5,500

$6,000

$6,500

$7,000

$0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.20 $1.25

Texas School Finance—FY 18 on a Cost Based Formula—BA $5,583Revenue per WADA — $1.04 Effective Tax Rate for all districts —Without Transportation

2/23/2018 Equity Center 23

Biggest Stumbling Blocks?

Those that Feel They must Protect the Status QuoThose that Purposefully Misidentify the Problems

2/23/2018 Equity Center 24

60% 61%63%

65%

59%

51%54% 53% 52%

54% 55% 55% 56% 56%58% 60%

40% 39%37%

35%

41%

49%46% 47% 48%

46% 45% 45% 44% 44%42% 40%

FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

Funding Texas Public Education‐‐TEA Summary of Finance 1/31/2018

% Local % State

2/23/2018 Equity Center 25

What does Chapter 41 reallymean?

2/23/2018 Equity Center 26

Not as much as you may think…

• According the latest TEA Summary of Finance data, about 344 districts will be designated Chapter 41 in 2018

• But of that number, most are “Chapter 41” because of the stagnant guaranteed level in Tier 2 Copper Pennies

• If you subtract each district’s state aid from its calculated recapture, then just 123 districts are true recapture districts

• e.g., sends more to the state than it gets from the state • That’s only 12% of all 1,018 districts

2/23/2018 Equity Center 27

Not as much as you may think…

344 Estimated Chapter 41 Districts in FY18

− 123 True Recapture Districts

221 Chapter 41 Districts that are substantially funded like Chapter 42 Districts

2/23/2018 Equity Center 28

Last session, the racket over recapture and ASATR drowned out the call for a more adequate system. 

It literally sucked all the oxygen out of the capitol.

2/23/2018 Equity Center 29

“Robin Hood” recaptures the efficiency lost to our over‐reliance on property taxation to fund our public schools. 

(That’s $320 per WADA over the biennium.)

2/23/2018 Equity Center 30

“Robin Hood” recaptures the efficiency lost to our over‐reliance on property taxation to fund our public schools. 

Recapture is estimated to provide about $4,100,000,000 in NECESSARY revenue this biennium.

(That’s $320 per WADA over the biennium.)

2/23/2018 Equity Center 31

“Robin Hood” recaptures the efficiency lost to our over‐reliance on property taxation to fund our public schools. 

Recapture is estimated to provide about $4,100,000,000 in NECESSARY revenue this biennium.

(That’s $320 per WADA over the biennium.)

2/23/2018 Equity Center 32

What would a system without recapture look like?

FY17 M&O Tax Rate

FY18 Current Law

FY18 without Recapture

Gain per Classroom

Tier 1 Recapture Districts 1.032 6,781  12,552  197,886 

Everyone Else 1.097 6,262 6,267  170 

Difference (6.5)cents 520  6,285  197,716

Additional State Funding Needed for the Biennium (without recapture) $4,100,000,000

2/23/2018 Equity Center 33

What would a system without recapture look like?

FY17 M&O Tax Rate

FY18 Current Law

FY18 without Recapture

Gain per Classroom

Wealthiest 10% (n = 102) 1.028  6,898  14,624  268,185 

Everyone Else 1.095  6,270  6,297  891 

Difference (6.7)cents 628  8,327  267,293 

Additional State Funding Needed for the Biennium (without recapture) $4,100,000,000

2/23/2018 Equity Center 34

2/23/2018 Equity Center

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

$10,000

$11,000

$12,000

$0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.20 $1.25

FY 18 Revenue per WADATEA January 2018 DATA

35

$28,000 gap per classroomof 22 students

2/23/2018 Equity Center

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

$10,000

$11,000

$12,000

$0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.20 $1.25

FY 18 Revenue per WADA‐‐No RecaptureTEA January 2018 DATA

36

$28,000 gap per classroomof 22 students

2/23/2018 Equity Center

$4,000

$12,000

$20,000

$28,000

$36,000

$44,000

$52,000

$60,000

$68,000

$76,000

$84,000

$0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.20 $1.25

FY 18 Revenue per WADA‐‐No RecaptureTEA January 2018 DATA

37

If not recapture, then what method of “efficiency” do we pick?

Choices• Eliminate local property tax and increase/create state tax to take its place

• Income Tax• State Property Tax• Increase Sales Tax• Split Tax Roll (Tax non‐homestead property at state level)• Keep and increase state Franchise Tax• Statewide Land Tax• Statewide fees

• Consolidation• Recapture

2/23/2018 Equity Center 38

2/23/2018 Equity Center 39


Recommended