25
Overview of ASW Process
Overview of ASW Process
5 Rating Categories
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute
to Academic
Success
3 Rating Categories
Not Demonstrated
Developing
Proficient
Accomplished
Distinguished
Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System
Overview of Standard 6
Contribute to
Academic Success
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests
6 NC Final Exams
6 Career Technical Education Assessment
6 Analysis of Student Work
K-3 Checkpoints6
6
Analysis of Student Work
6 Analysis of Student Work
Contribute
to Academic
Success
In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages.
Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.
Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process
ASW Process: A Quick Guide
Teaching Context
• Screen shot
Determining Participation
1. If 60% of an educator’s classes are in ASW subject areas, then the educator must participate in both ASW and any other Standard 6 measure covering the remaining classes. 2. If 60% of an educator’s classes are not in ASW identified areas, then the teacher is not required to participate in ASW.
Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s schedule has been validated. The principal will then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the schedule is correct.
Principal’s Input
Class Selection
Beginning in 2014 – 2015, the online platform will select the classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts.
Objectives:Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives.
Objective Selection
Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart
Some examples of meetings:• PDPs• teacher meetings
Principal’s Input
Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA):a) A specific objective
b) Sample type• Individual Student
or
• Whole Class
c) Collection Method
d) Samples from Point 1 and Point 2
e) Context
5 Timelapse Artifacts
Time passes
Teachers Collect Work Samples for Timelapse Artifacts
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TA 1
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples
Online platform will select3 students
The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students.
Student Selection
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples
If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled and another student will be selected.
Student Selection
TA 1
TA 1
Principal’s Input
The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher.
Context for 1st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact
How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
Upload Evidence
How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways.1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest.3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow.4. The elbows are bending during the compression.
Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact
Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.
Upload Evidence
Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.
CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival
All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platformas the teacher’sEvidence Collectionfor the school year.
TA 3Student
TA 4Student
TA 5Whole Class
TA 1 Student
TA 2 Whole Class
Upload Evidence
The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review
ED M
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.
M
Reviewer #3
Blind Review
E
An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6
Effectiveness Status
3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6
6 6 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Standard Standard Standard
Questions about Educator Effectiveness, NCEES or ASWVisitwww.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model
or http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki
or
ASW Wiki at http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ You can also email questions to
[email protected] for Healthful Living
[email protected] for the Arts
[email protected] for World Languages
[email protected] for AP/IB
[email protected] for Course Codes
