8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 1/24
OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
WASTE PROCESSING BY EARTHWORMS
Optimal conditions for earthworm activity
Cool temperature: between 0 and 35oC
Not too much water (85% moisture)
Mineralization in the earthworm gut
As feed passes through the earthworm gut the material is mineralized and plantnutrients are available. The grinding effect of the gizzard and the passagethrough the gut leads to the formation of a granule
(15) (16).
Casts have a structure that is similar to a slow release granule: it has an organicmatter core and a clay casing
(1).
Casts benefit to plants
Casts contain the necessary nutrients for plant growth: when added in sufficient
amounts, as in 4-10 Kg casts / m2, casts can out-yield NPK fertilizers (100 Kg
N / m2)
(13).
Casts increase plant dry weight and N, P, Mg and K uptake from the soil (12)
.
The presence of earthworms increases plant growth and N uptake as opposed to
unfertilized soil (19).
Casts have a hormone-like effect that increases germination and growth rate(14)
.
Waste preparation for processing by earthworms
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 2/24
Organic debris are more palatable to earthworms if it’s fresh or incubated for up
to 2 weeks. The particle size of organic matter doesn’t matter(23)
.
Earthworms have less requirements than microbes in processing carbon andnitrogen
(24). The C:N ratio which results in the most stable earthworm casts is
25 (Ndegwa and Thompson, 2000).
High salinity levels and alkalinity harm earthworms. Earthworms are also
sensitive to pesticides(25)
.
Types of earthworms used
Earthworms are chosen for their resistance to extreme conditions and feedingand reproductive rate. They also need to survive handling.
Eisenia foetida is the most efficient in waste processing, while Eudriluseugeniae is large, fast growing, reasonably prolific and would be ideal for protein production Eudrilus eugenia
(17).
CASTS OR COMPOST?
Both are organic products which provide the plant with nutrients, good soil aeration and
other un-identified advantages (the “organic matter effect”)(10)
.
Comparison as to plant nutrients
Plants treated with compost may still show N deficiency, even when syntheticfertilizer is added. His is due to N immobilization: microorganisms in compost
use N for their metabolism (3).
More decomposition (Lignolysis) occurs and higher levels of Nitrogen arereached when waste is fed to worms than in composting. Casts also increase
protein synthesis in plants(7)
.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 3/24
Compost can be an incomplete fertilizer, most plants have a an increase in yield
with the addition of compost, organic N sources can cause a short term yield
decrease(18)
.
Comparison as to the timing of nutrient release
Slow nutrient release is more synchronized with plant needs, and leads tohigher yields
(9).
Casts have a structure that is similar to a slow release granule: it has an organicmatter core and a clay casing
(1).
In my master’s thesis (Chaoui et al, 2003) I showed that casts show a slowernutrient release rate than compost, possibly explaining the higher plant weight
to nutrient content ratio.
Comparison as to salinity level
Ammonium is the main contributor to salinity levels.
High salinity levels cause osmotic drought.
NH4 levels are high in fresh casts but casts stabilize after 2 weeks of aging
through nitrification. The acidity level in casts is slightly low, which reducesdenitrification
(5). Salinity levels are moderate in casts, since passage through
the earthworm gut does not increase the level of some salts (Ca, Mg, Na) (2)
.
Some composts have high concentrations of ammonium or soluble salts (6)
.There are larger amounts of NH4 than NO3 in composted domestic waste. High
Levels of NH4 are due to non-stabilized substances(4)
. Immature (unfinished)compost can stunt or kill plants, and reduce germination and growth
(11).
Comparison as to pathogens
Recycling organic waste through earthworms also results in a product with a
lower pathogen level than compost (8)
.
Since high temperature are not part of the earthworm cast production process
disease suppressing microorganisms that may be present in this material
survives in the absence of heat(20)
.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 4/24
Some composts are suppressive of plant pathogens but heating them to 60oC for
five days reduced suppressiveness. This is why some composts need to be
inoculated with disease suppressing microorganisms. Adding nutrients (i.e.reducing competition) also reduces disease suppression by composts
(21).
Comparing Earthworm Casts and Compost as to their processes
Comparison as to time and volume requirement
Earthworms eat 75% of their weight daily (Ndegwa, 1999) and the speed or
earthworm casts production can be increased by increasing the amount ofearthworms. The layer of waste needs to be 1 ft or thinner to prevent anaerobic
conditions which hinder earthworm activity.
A compost pile needs to be 3 cubed feet to hold heat in winter and takes 3-4months to be cured
(22).
Comparison as to odor problem
Odorous gases are emitted as compost piles heat up. Specific layering ofcomposting material needs to be used to prevent odor.
Earthworms don’t require heat to process waste (heat is actually detrimental).In the correct waste to worms ratio fermentation and heat can be prevented, and
also odor or flies.
Aeration requirements
Compost needs aeration (and labor) to maintain aerobic conditions for microbial
activity.
Worms dig canals (burrows) as they process waste which indirectly aerates the
processed material.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 5/24
(1) Casts have a structure that is similarto a slow release
granule: it has an
organic matter core anda clay casing.
Casts Structure
In Chan & Heenan (1995) worm casts had a composite structure, made of units 210-
500 micro-m in diameter which were made of smaller spherical subunits (50-100micro-m). Casts were significantly more water stable and higher in total nitrogen
than in soil aggregates of the same size. Porosity in the casts was created by spaces
between the subunits, which were composed of very densely packed clay/silt size
particles. Evidence from scanning electron microscopy suggests the high stabilityto be due to the presence of cements (Chan & Heenan, 1995). In Fragoso et al.
(1993) casts structure of the Trigaster earthworm species showed granules
composed of organic debris fractions (250-2000 m). When earthworms were
added to soil made of 1-2 mm aggregates (Schrader et al . 1994), molding processesin the earthworm gut destabilized the soil structure but at the same time biochemical
processes act as an antagonistic stabilizing system. Shipitalo (1986) observed that
freshly deposited moist casts were 26 to 41% more dispersible than uningestedmoist soil due to disruption of some existing bonds during gut transit. When casts
were aged or dried there was a stronger bond of plant microbial polysaccharides and
other organic materials to clay, predominantly via clay-polyvalent catio-organic
matter (C-P-OM) linkages involving calcium (Shipitalo, 1986). Zhang & Schrader(1993) showed that organic C and CaCO3 act as bonding agents and the CaCO3 is
involved with binding linkages with organic matter during digestion, the more
stable are the formed aggregates. They also observed that in L. terrestris casts were
very water stable, maybe due to the presence of Ca humate or organic matter- polyvalent cation-soil particle bonds. Organic C in those same casts increased by
21 to 43%. Water extractable polysaccharides increased too, maybe due to
enrichment of mucopolysaccharides during ingestion, or from cutaneous polysaccharides (Zhang & Schrader, 1993). In Marinissen & Dexter (1990) aging
made casts more stable, probably due to fungi that developed on the surface of 6
days old casts. Artificial casts were made by molding soil at 100% moisture and pushing it through a 1.5 mm opening syringe, and compared to natural casts as to
stability, which was measured as the capacity to prevent clay dispersion. Internal
stability was measure by breaking down casts (magnetic stirrer) and the external one
by using a paddle stirrer. Stability of the aggregate surface increased with aging but
was the internal stability remained the same. Since internal stability seems todepend on % of microaggregates, no new ones were formed (Marinissen & Dexter,
1990). Shipitalo & Protz (1989) observed that earthworms fragmented litter bygrazing and a liquefied soil and debris mixture formed in their gut. In the gizzard,
more fragmentation, microbial activity and digestive enzymes decompose organic
matter, which becomes part of the soil plasma. Lignified particles resistfragmentation and clay minerals are brought close to newly formed bonding agents
(polysaccharides). The organic matter enriched plasma adheres to surfaces of the
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 6/24
organic skeleton of resistant organic fragments (with the help of bonding material),
forming new aggregates. Pellets are excreted in this state and both drying and agingstrengthens the bond between organic and mineral components. Therefore Shipitalo
& Protz (1989) concluded that ingestion of soil and litter in earthworms brings clay
in close contact with decomposing organic fragments, creating the organic matter
cored microaggregates. Organic matter is therefore encapsulated by clay and itresists rapid decomposition. The linkages within the aggregates consist of clay-
polyvalent cation - organic matter (C-P-OM) bonds and they seem to makeaggregates more stable.
(2) Salinity levels are
moderate in casts, since
passage through theearthworm gut does not
increase the level of
some salts (Ca, Mg, Na).
Salinity in Earthworm Casts
Casts seems to reduce the salinity problem caused by an excess of NH 4 in an
experiment where tomato plants were grown in sand, clayey loam, and garden
soil processed by Californian earthworms. Feeding with NH4 (instead of NO3)
slowed down plant growth in sand, less in loam, and not at all in soil processed by earthworms (Borowski, 1995). Basker et al. (1993) observed that
exchangeable Ca, Mg and Na were marginally higher in casts than in non-ingested soil, soil, and that ingestion by earthworms increased he potassium levelof the soil.
(19) presence of worms
increases plant growth
and N uptake asopposed to unfertilized
soil.
Effect of Casts on Plant Growth
In the 1980’s, at a research station in Rothamsted, earthworms were collectedand put in buckets of clean water, in batches of 250. A solution of 0.2%
formaldehyde was spread on the field to drive the worms out of their burrows.
They were then rinsed in a second bucket of clean water and spread at a rate of
250 worms m
-2
over a landfill site capped with 15cm of clay subsoil, treated withdomestic dried sewage solid at 10 tons ha-1
and planted with grass. A higher
plant growth was observed in the presence of worms (Edwards & Bates, 1992).
According to Haimi (1992) birch seedlings planted in soil with earthworms had33% and 24% more leaf and stem biomass respectively than in those grown in
pots without earthworms. Root biomass was slightly lower in the earthworms
than in the bare soil treatment and N content of leaves was twice higher in thetreatment with earthworms. This was only partially explained by earthworm
mortality. N uptake increases in the presence of earthworms and is correlated (r
= 0.85) with the increase in CO2 production (Ruz – Jerez, 1992).
(3) Plants treated with
compost may still show N deficiency, even when synthetic fertilizer is
added. His is due to N
immobilization:
microorganisms incompost use N for their
metabolism.
Nutrient Dynamics in Compost
Cocomposted sewage sludge is obtained by aerobic digestion of municipal refuse
and anaerobically digested sewage sludge. N immobilization can be a problem in
these composts. Plants showed N deficiency symptoms even when supplied with
NH4 NO3, along with reduced dry matter production and lower plant Nconcentrations. Also there was no difference between the 11, 22 and 44 tons of
compost ha-1
. Therefore when applied at agronomic rates compost can support
plant growth, id adequate amounts of supplemental N fertilizers are used (Sims,
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 7/24
1990).
(4) There are larger
amounts of NH 4 than
NO3 in composteddomestic waste. High
Levels of NH 4 are due tonon-stabilized substances.
Nutrient Dynamics in Compost
Composted urban refuses were studied as organic fertilizers (Villar et al., 1993).
Most of the total N was in organic forms; NH4 was more abundant than NO3, and
calcium was the most abundant nutrient followed by K, Na, Mg and P. Most ofthe Ca and Na were in available forms; available K and Mg were lower and
available P very small. Although compost was unbalanced with regard to the
main nutrients, it had potential agronomic value. Total C contents and C/N ratiosin the three non-amended composts were in the range for stabilized composts;
however, the NH4 content seemed to point to the presence of non-stabilized
substances (Villar et al., 1993).
(5) NH 4 levels are high
in fresh casts but casts
stabilize after 2 weeks ofaging through
nitrification. The aciditylevel in casts is slightly
low, which reducesdenitrification.
Nutrient Dynamics in Earthworm Casts
In fresh casts, NH4 levels were very high (294.2-233.98 g g-1
dry cast) duemineralization in the earthworm gut. During the first week of cast aging, NH4
levels decreased while NH3 levels increased, due to rapid nitrification in the freshcasts. After two weeks the levels of NH4 and NO3 were stabilized, probably dueto organic matter protection in dry casts (Decaens, 1999). Casts tend to stabilize
through nitrification after being deposited; in a garden soil processed by
earthworm ammonium underwent complete nitrification compared with 33 and
9% nitrification in loam and sand, respectively (Borowski, 1995). In Decaens(1999) C increased during cast aging (+100%), possibly because of CO2 fixation
or macrofaunal activities in casts. Stabilized earthworm casts leached less
dissolvable organic carbon than from undigested soil. Nutrient losses from caststhat underwent several wetting / drying cycles show that there was a strong
protection of nutrients in casts at first, but this was reduced as the aggregate
structure was weakened (McInerney et al., 2000). After a 20 days longincubation of fresh casts a rapid increase in mineral N was observed during thefirst few days after deposition, and then a decrease to a level 4.5 times higher
than in the soil. Also the NH4 level was higher in fresh casts than in the control
(Rangel, 1999). The decrease of mineral N in time in casts can be due to N becoming microbial biomass, volatilized, denitrified, or leached (Lavelle, 1992).
In Haynes (1999) uningested soil and casts were incubated for 42 days, and
extractable P levels were similar in casts and soils during the initial stages ofincubation, but were larger in casts after 28 and 42 days. Activities of
arylsulphatase and acid phosphatase were lower in casts than in uningested soil,
therefore the mineralization of organic matter during gut transit could be the
reason for the increase in extractable P and S during incubation. Haynes (1999)concluded that mineral N increases because of mineralization in the gut, but P
and S levels increase due to mineralization after egestion. In Lavelle (1992)
mineral N in casts was mostly in the form of ammonium, and after a 26 days long
incubation NH4 was nitrified or immobilized in biomass. The incubation of soil before ingestion increased NH4 production in casts and being slightly acidic casts
do not favor the denitrification of NO3. Biomass N was stable (relatively) after
an initial flush on day 1. Processing by earthworms increases lignin
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 8/24
mineralization, as compared with just mixing with soil and the passage in the gut
might affect lignin structure (Scheu, 1993).
(6) Some composts have
high concentrations ofammonium or soluble
salts.
Salinity in Compost
The salinity problem is shown in O'Brien & Barker (1996) by the inhibitions in
seed germination and in plant growth in some composts, which is associated withhigh concentrations of ammonium or soluble salts in the media. Ammonium-N
in the compost declined with time (over 28 days), whereas nitrate-N and
electrical conductivity initially increased then decreased with time. Ammoniumsalts appear to be lost from the compost more rapidly than nitrate salts, which
have a prolonged inhibitory effect on germination and growth (O'Brien & Barker,
1996).
(18) Compost can be an
incomplete fertilizer,
most plants have a anincrease in yield with
the addition of compost,organic N sources can
cause a short term yielddecrease.
Effect of Compost on Plant Growth
An increase in soil productivity, which cannot be explained by mineral
nutrients alone, is often recorded when composted organic wastes are supplied to
croplands. This is the so-called "organic matter effect" suggests that mechanismsother than simple nutrient supply can contribute to plant growth (Galli et al.1992). Hountin et al. (1995) studied the effect of peat moss-shrimp wastes
compost on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) applied alone or with NPK, and he
concluded that the main effect of compost on straw yield, numbers of tillers, plant height, and number of ears was more important than that of fertilizer.
Compost was considered incomplete as a fertilizer in Hartz et al. (1996) when
composted green yard and landscape waste and peat were evaluated as to plantnutrient supply. Both were mixed with perlite and added to pots planted with
tomatoes and marigolds at a volume ratio of 1:1. Fertigation regimes of 0, 50, or
100 mg L-1
of 15N-13P-12K). Compost was equivalent or superior to peat in
plant growth and it contributed to crop macronutrient nutrition, but the highestfertigation rate was required for optimum growth. In Chong et al. (1991)
deciduous ornamental shrubs were grown in 33%, 67%, and 100% of three
different sources of compost. Despite large variation in species growth responseto sources and levels of compost, most grew equally well or better in the
compost-amended regimes than in the control and were influenced little, or not at
all, by initial or prevailing salt levels in the media. Shoot and root dry weight of
some plants increased with increasing compost levels. The reverse relationshipoccurred (all sources) in shoot and root dry weight of privet and root dry weight
of weigela and potentilla. Leaf nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Zn)tended to increase with increasing compost levels, but not all species showed this
response with all nutrients. Regardless of compost source or level, all shrubswere of marketable quality when harvested, except privet, which showed leaf
chlorosis in all compost-amended regimes (Chong et al., 1991). Fauci & Dick
(1994) observed that the efficiency of organic N uptake from organic fertilizersvaries with the type of fertilizer, and organic N sources can cause short-term crop
yield decreases. 10-30% of N was taken up when poultry manure or pea vine
residues were added (Fauci & Dick, 1994).
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 9/24
(10) Both are organic
products which providethe plant with nutrients,
good soil aeration and
other un-identified
advantages (the“organic matter effect”)
(effect of compost on plant growth)
An increase in soil productivity, which cannot be explained by mineral nutrients
alone, is often recorded when composted organic wastes are supplied tocroplands. This is the so-called "organic matter effect" suggests that mechanisms
other than simple nutrient supply can contribute to plant growth (Galli et al.1992).
(7) More decomposition(Lignolysis) occurs and
higher levels of Nitrogen
are reached when waste
is fed to worms than incomposting. Casts also
increase protein
synthesis in plants.
Compost as Compared to Casts
In Vinceslas-Akpa & Loquet (1997) lignocellulosic wastes (of maple) werecomposted and vermicomposted (i.e. ingested by earthworms) for 10 months
under controlled conditions. At first, total organic matter and carbon decreased
rapidly, while cellulose was decomposing. Aromatic structures and lignin began
to decompose after one month of composting. More ligninolysis occurred in the
vermicompost. The C-to-N ratio decreased, showing changes in total C andhigher levels of N in the vermicompost. The two materials evolved differently:
casts had a lower aromaticity ratio, and a higher protein-to-organic matter ratiothan in compost, which indicates a higher level of humification (Vinceslas-Akpa& Loquet, 1997). When casts and compost were compared in a pot experiment
casts increased protein synthesis in lettuce seedlings by approximately 30%,
whereas no differences were recorded in the presence of compost (Galli et al.1992)
(8) recycling organic
waste through
earthworms also results
in a product with alower pathogen level
than compost.
Compost as Compared to Casts (continued)
The process of vermicomposting can also result in a product with a lower
pathogen level than compost (Eastman, 1999).
(9) Slow nutrient release
is more synchronized
with plant needs, andleads to higher yields.
Effect of Nutrient Availability and slow release on Plant Growth
When supplied with inorganic nitrogen, grain sorghum plants were found to havea higher intake rate than when supplied with organic nitrogen (Jordan, 1996).
Al-Karaki (1995) exposed plants to P stress and found that lower dry matter in
shoot and root was due to less water uptake, and not to P deficiency. Catanazaro(1998) showed the importance of the synchronization between nutrient release
and plant uptake by comparing alternate liquid fertilization, constant liquid
fertilization, resin coated slow release fertilizer and slow release fertilizer tablets.When he provoked leaching less nutrients leached with the slow release products.In the same study slow release tablets caused nutrient deficiency and slow release
resin coated fertilizer had the most efficient N uptake 64-68% as compared to 41-
46% in liquid fertilizer. Several methods were tested by Choi & Nelson (1996)in order to obtain a slow release fertilizer, which would be more synchronized
with the nutrient requirement of the fertilized plant: to prolong the period of N a
bacterium - Brevibacterium lactofermentum - was bonded to kraft lignin, a
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 10/24
substance highly resistant to degradation. To retard mineralization further, the
bacterium-lignin mixture was reacted with formaldehyde to form amino cross-links within and between protein chains. Bonding to lignin was undesirable
because N release occurred during the same period as from the bacteria unbound
to lignin and the total amount of N recovered was reduced to only 42%. Cross-
linking with formaldehyde was less desirable since N was released mainly duringthe first 4 weeks and the total amount of N released was even lower than for the
bacterium-lignin mixture. Additions of urea to the latter reaction did not improvesubsequent N mineralization. In a second set of treatments lignin was withheld
and the bacterium was reacted with formaldehyde. Five percent formaldehyde by
weight (of the bacterium) successfully reduced release of N during the first 4
weeks and increased it thereafter. In this treatment N was released from week 2through the end of the test (12 weeks). Peak release occurred at 6 weeks. This
resulting N source could be combined with other slow-release N sources to form
a slow release N fertilizer (Choi & Nelson, 1996). Controlled release fertilizers
were compared to water soluble fertilizer as to nutrient leaching in Marigold
plants (Cox, 1993). The controlled release fertilizer was only more effective thansoluble fertilizer at reducing leaching when applied in 2 small doses instead of
one (one at planting, the other 15 to 35 days later). Leaching is reducing byapplying the controlled release fertilizer rather than incorporating it in the
medium. In all fertilizer types and application methods NO3 was the
predominant type of N found in the leachate (Cox, 1993).
(11) immature
(unfinished) compostcan stunt or kill plants,
and reduce germination
and growth.
(Most composters don't do any testing of their compost. After a while, you'll get
a "sense"
of the look, feel, and smell of finished compost. For uses other than top-
dressing/mulch,
immature (unfinished) compost may stunt or kill plants. Therefore, the grower
should
determine compost maturity before using compost as a growing media or
incorporating compost
into soils.
The simplest of testing method is to put your compost in a couple of pots and
plant some radish
seeds in the compost. If 3/4 or more of the seed sprout and grow into radishes,
then your compost
is ready to use in any application. Radishes are used because they germinate
(sprout) and mature
quickly. If you want to conduct more scientific tests of your compost, follow the
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 11/24
three simple
procedures outlined below.)
This web site and tutorial was created under the auspices of Sarasota County
Government
Environmental Services Business Center Solid Waste Division
<http://www.co.sarasota.fl.us/solid_waste/>, Resource Conservation Section,
with
innovative recycling grant funds provided by the Florida Department of
Environmental
Protection <http://www.dep.state.fl.us>. Content for this site was provided by
Resource
Management Group, Inc. <http://recyclesmart.com>, with web design by R.W.
Beck,
Inc. <http://www.rwbeck.com>
The Composting Tutorial is based on the Master Composter Handbook
developed by Hillsborough
Cooperative Extension Service through a grant from the Hillsborough County
Solid Waste
Management Department <http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/solidwaste/home.html>.
(12) Casts increase plant dry weight and N,
P, Mg and K uptake
from the soil.
Effect of Casts on Plant Growth (continued)
The application of earthworm casts (0, 100, and 300 g per 3.5 kg soil) increasedthe dry weight of soybean by 40 to 70%. The nitrogen absorbed by the plants
from the soil increased to 30 to 50%. Phosphorous and potassium in the plant
were twice that of the control. The amount of organic matter, total nitrogen,
phosphorous and potassium in the soil also increased, as well as available phosphorous and potassium in the soil (Lui et al., 1991). The presence of
earthworm casts increase the uptake efficiency of nitrogen as shown in Zhao et
al. (1988) where the addition 15N labeled chemical fertilizer mixed withearthworm casts increased the nitrogen utilization coefficient from 22.4 to 38.4%and that of the N-P fertilizer from 33.2 to 40.9%. In Hidalgo (1997) media: casts
ratios of 1:1, 2:1 and 3:1 increased growth index, stem diameter, root growth, dry
weight, flower initiation and flower number compared to peat moss: perlite (7:3)and pine bark: sand (4:1). Earthworm casts were found to increase nutrient
uptake in Tomati (1994), including nitrogen and several ions, particularly Mg
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 12/24
and K.
(13) Casts contain the
necessary nutrients for
plant growth: whenadded in sufficient
amounts, as in 4-10 Kg
casts / m2 , casts can
outyield NPK fertilizers(100 Kg N / m
2 ).
Effect of Casts on Plant Growth (continued)
In Saciragic et al. (1986) plants were given NPK or 2-10 kg casts m-2
. Cabbagesgiven 4 kg casts leeks given 10-kg casts outyielded the NPK controls. Fodder
sorghum given 10 kg of compost and cut twice yielded only 60% as much dry
matter as when given NPK (110-kg N m-2
). It was concluded that foddersorghum required fertilizer as well as. Casts are not only used in horticulture, but
in agronomic crops too.
(14) Casts have a
hormone like effect that
increase germnination
and growth rate.
Effect of Casts on Plant Growth (continued)
Indole compounds were detected in the worms, but it was not possible to identifyspecific auxins (Hidalgo, 1997). When used in horticulture, earthworm casts
have a hormone-like effect. The biological effect of casts is linked to microbial
metabolites that influence plant metabolism, growth and development (Tomati etal., 1997). Casts of the earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei increased germination
rate and enhanced seedling growth of cucumber seeds in Hidalgo (1999), and it
was concluded that studies are needed to determine if casts contain the plant-
growth- promoting hormones and available nutrients necessary to enhancegermination and plant growth.
(15) As feed passesthrough the earthworm
gut the material is
mineralized and plantnutrients are available.
Production of Earthworm casts
As explained by Edwards (1995), earthworms ingest organic matter and egest itas much finer particles after passing through a grinding gizzard that they all
possess. Worms feed on the microorganisms that grow upon the organic material.
They take over the role of aerating necessary in composting to maintain aerobicconditions and their turnover rate is much higher than with composting as they process 3 feet deep layers of suitable organic material in less than 30 days
(Edwards, 1995). Edwards & Bates (1992) found Eisina fetida to be the best
choice due to its wide temperature and moisture tolerance, and because it is atough worm easy to handle and it out competes other species. Thee highest
growth rate in Eisina fetida at 30oC and 85% moisture. A maximum of cocoons
hatched at 20 o
C, which was considered optimum growth temperature for thisworm (Edwards & Bates, 1992)
During this process, N, P and Ca mineralized. Worms die at temperatures higher
than 35
o
C, and they process OM best at temperature between 15 and 25
o
C, and amoisture of 70 to 90%. Different materials are mixed before processing for
faster results and a better product. Also worms have a limited tolerance to some
chemicals. The most commonly used earthworm is Eisina fetida and the bestresults are obtained by using raised beds, feedstock is added at the top and casts
are collected at the bottom through mesh floors. In 25 kinds of vegetables, fruits
or ornamentals casts did better than compost or commercial potting mixes.(Edwards, 1995). There's scientific evidence that human pathogens do not
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 13/24
survive the vermicomposting process (Edwards and Bohlen, 1995).
(16)
As feed passes through
the earthworm gut the
material is mineralizedand plant nutrients are
available.
Effect of Ingestion by Earthworms
Many studies were conducted on the process by which earthworms
transform organic matter after ingesting it and on the properties of the
resulting material, but very few were based on stabilized casts, compared tosynthetic fertilizers and compost. Orozco (1996) investigated the ability of
Eisina Fetida, one of the most promising earthworms for vermicomposting,
to enrich coffee pulp through digestion. The ingested material had no
available C or N originally, but a minimum of 178 ppm of available nitrogen
and 0.86% extractable C were found in the casts, along with higher P, Ca
and Mg values, with a decrease in K content only. Earthworms increase
nitrogen mineralization rate (Pashanasi, 1992; Parmelee, 1988; Ruz-Jerez,
1992). Available N increased irrespective of the residues the earthworms
feed on or the growth temperature, which was attributed to the increase in
oxidized C due to soil ingestion, and not to change in soil texture since the
soil was not mixed (Ruz-Jerez, 1992). Binet (1992) found the consumptionof Rye grass by Earthworms to be 2.4-mg dry weight g-1
fresh mass of
earthworm day-1
, and 3 times more N was released in casts than in the soil
before ingestion, which represents 0.13 mg N / g live worm / day.
Furthermore a 10% N renewal in earthworm biomass in 85 days was
observed, meaning 10% of worm-biomass N was replaced by N from the
soil, and 28% of available N was due to N excretion. Extractable carbon
was found to increase in soil material ingested by earthworms, which was
explained by the possible effect of indigenous enzymes in the gut and the
incomplete resorbtion of organic C before excretion (Daniel, 1992). The
excreted polysaccharides in the earthworm gut (Arthur, 1963) could also be
responsible for this increase. According to Lavelle (1992) high levels ofammonium are found in fresh casts due to the excretion of NH4 through the
endonephridia gland into the gut, and the mineralization of soil organic
matter by the ingested soil microflora in the middle and posterior part of the
gut. Low NO3 in fresh casts show that nitrate isn't a metabolic product of
EW (Lavelle, 1992).
(20) Since high
temperature are not part
of the earthworm cast production process
disease suppressing
microorganisms thatmay be present in thismaterial survives in the
absence of heat.
Plant pathogens: High temperatures are not part of organic matter processing by
earthworms and casts may inherently contain the microorganisms necessary fordisease suppression. Only a few studies have tested for suppression in earthworm
casts (Szczech, et al ., 1993) and a few others for disease suppression in the
presence of earthworms - Aporrectodea spp. (Stephens & Davoren, 1997;
Stephens et al ., 1994). Szczech & Smolinska (2001) showed a suppression of Phytophthora sp. by earthworm casts.
Foodborne diseases: Foodborne disease outbreaks traced to fresh fruits and
vegetables are increasingly recognized in the US. For example, a recent literaturereview cites twice as many produce-related foodborne disease outbreaks between
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 14/24
1988-1992 as in the five year period prior to 1988 (Buck et al., 2003). The risk
of product contamination with foodborne pathogens is a concern for farmersusing organic or conventional methods of agriculture alike. The primary source
of produce contamination in the field is believed to be either the irrigation water
or a soil (amended with manure) reservoir. Earthworms have been exploited to
accelerate biodegradation of organic wastes from farms. Previous experimentsdemonstrate that Enterobacteriacea including Salmonella are not isolated from
the gastrointestinal tract of earthworms, even when worms are raised in heavilycontaminated environments (Finola et al., 1995). This data would suggest that
many Gram negative bacteria, such as those responsible for many of the
foodborne diseases, do not survive passage through the gastrointestinal tract of
the earthworm.
(21) Some composts are
suppressive of plant
pathogens but heatingthem to 60 C for fivedays reduced
suppressiveness. This is
why some composts needto be inoculatedwith
disease suppressing
microorganisms.
Adding nutrients (i.e.
reducing competition)
also reduces disease suppression by
composts.
Suppression of soil borne diseases has been reported for several kinds of
composts (Chung et al . 1988). Abbasi et al. (2002) demonstrated reduced
bacterial disease and anthracnose on fruit and increased yield in organically- produced tomatoes produced in soil amended with compost. Both compost and
manure were also shown to influence populations of plant parasitic and free-
living nematodes in transitional organic soil cropped to tomatoes (Nahar et al2004). Populations of plant parasitic nematodes, primarily Pratylenchus
crenatus, were inversely correlated with populations of fungal- and bacterial-
feeding and omnivorous nematodes, and with soil organic matter content. Chen
et al. (1987) showed that heating suppressive composts to 60C for five daysdestroyed suppression. Suppressiveness was also reduced when nutrients were
added to the planting mixture, which is consistent with the hypothesis that
nutrient competition between the compost microflora and the pathogen Pythium
spp. contributes to disease suppression (Mandelbaum and Hadar, 1990). Certaintypes of composted pine bark suppressed Pythium damping-off diseases when
incorporated into planting mixes (Boehm et al., 1993). Since an increase in
temperature is part of the composting process, it is sometimes necessary toinoculate composts with beneficial microorganisms (Hoitink et al ., 1993).
(22) A compost pileneeds to be 3 cubed feet
to hold heat in winter
and takes 3-4 months to
be cured
OSU extension: A large compost pile insulates itself and holds the heat ofmicrobial activity. Its center will be warmer than its edges. Piles smaller than
three feet cubed (27 cu. ft.; 3-4 ft tall) have trouble holding this heat in the
winter, while piles larger than five feet cubed (125 cu. ft.; 5-6 ft tall) do not allow
enough air to reach the microbes at the center. These proportions are ofimportance if your goal is fast, high temperature composting. Large piles are
useful for composting diseased plants or trees as the high temperatures will kill
pathogens and insects.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 15/24
Moisture and Aeration
[...] The larger the pile, the higher the temperature and the faster the composting
proceeds, but only up to a certain point. At temperatures higher than 160 degreesF, composting slows down and charring or burning begins. This can become a
problem in dry composts, particularly in the summer.
How to Prepare and Use Compost
Remove grass and sod cover from the area where you construct your compost pile to allow direct contact of the materials with soil microorganisms. The
following "recipe" for constructing your compost heap is recommended for best
results:
After 3-4 weeks, fork the materials into a new pile, turning the outside of the old
heap into the center of the new pile. Add water if necessary. It is best to turn your
compost a second or third time. The compost should be ready to use within threeto four months. A heap started in late spring can be ready for use in the autumn.
Start another heap in autumn for use in the spring.
You can make compost even faster by turning the pile more often. Check the
internal temperature regularly; when it decreases substantially (usually after
about a week), turn the pile.
(23) Organic debris aremore palatable to
earthworms if it’s fresh
or incubated for up to 2
weeks. The particle sizeof organic matter
doesn’t matter.
In Martin et al. (1992) it was shown that when fresh material is compared toincubated material, worms prefer fresh organic matter as in undecomposed plant
debris or debris incubated for 2 weeks. Incubation of the material fed to
earthworms for 2, 5 and 10 weeks caused an increase in growth rate and yield
efficiency. With fresh plants (or plants incubated for 10 weeks or less) wormseat less and gain more weight than with material incubated for more than 10
weeks.
Martin et al. (1992) states that worms prefer leaves to roots: When leaves are
incubated for more than 10 weeks however the material becomes only as
beneficial as fresh root material: plant material decomposed for a long time hasless nutritive value. When roots are incubated for 2-5 weeks they increase
growth rate, but without a change in yield efficiency. This was explained by the
fact that fresh OM has a higher water-soluble content and more N availability.
Also in the same study all plant material have the same value after a longincubation time since all easily assimilable compounds are gone. When legumesand grass were compared they gave different yield efficiency results although
they both have same N content because legumes have higher nitrogen
assimilability.
As to the particle size effect, a fraction of soil OM was replaced with labeled C
- OM. The results showed that worms ingested similar amounts of coarse OM
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 16/24
(young OM – 250 – 200 µm) and fine OM (0.20µm). This indicates that particle
size does not matter (Martin et al. , 1992).
(24) Earthworms haveless requirements than
microbes in processing
carbon and nitrogen.
Although high amounts of low molecular weight proteins encourage microbialgrowth and consequently mineralization there's a possibility that earthworms
have lower requirements than microbes in processing C and N (proteins
included) since material that goes through the earthworm gut show a highermineralization rate than in the case where it's just incorporated in the soil (where
decomposition occurs through microbes); Devliegher and Verstraete (1996)
studied the effects of nutrient enrichment processes (i.e. allowing the passage of
organic residues from the surface of the soil to below the surface) and those ofgut associated process (i.e. enzymatic activities in the earthworm gut that
increase the nutrient content of the ingested residues). They concluded that if the
weight-increase of the worms is accounted for, the nutrient content of ingested
organic material largely makes up for the nutrient content of the same materialwhen simply incorporated in the soil. Therefore we might assume that earthworm
have less restrictions than microbes on protein quality and carbon to protein ratio
as related to decomposition of organic matter.
(25) High salinity levelsand alkalinity harm
earthworms.
Earthworms are also
sensitive to pesticides.
A pH of 8.5 and electrical conductivity of 8 dS m-1 were found to harmearthworms. Alklainity and salinity are harmful to both earthworms and
microorganism (Santamaria-Romero et al ., 2001). Worms can be used to assess
the environmental effects of chemicals because they can predict the effect of
chemicals on other soil invertebrates. The survival rate of earthworms when atoxic chemical is added to the soil would then be the indicator of the level of
toxicity of this chemical Edwards et al. (1992).
Edwards et al. (1992) states that pesticides tested on worms in labs are more
consistent since a standard number of worms from the same species is in intimate
contact with the pesticides. Still soils with different absorbing capacities have been used. He also considers that the unvalid methods would be applying a
chemical directly to the earthworms (the results would be unrealistic), mixing a
chemical with the earthworm food (due to food repellency problems) and
injecting the tested chemical into the earthworm, since this can cause direct
injury and falsify the results.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 17/24
References:
Abbasi, P. A., Al-Dahmani, J., Sahin, F., Hoitink, H. A. J. and Miller, S. A. 2002.Effect of composts on disease severity and yield in organic and
conventionally produced tomatoes. Plant Disease, 86, 156-161.
Al-Karaki, G.N., Clark, R.B. & Sullivan, C.Y. (1995). Effects of Phosphorous and
Water Stress Levels on Growth and Phosphorous Uptake of Bean andSorghum Cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18 (3), 563-578.
Aulakh, M.S. & Doran, J.W. (1996). Kinetics of nitrification under upland and
flooded soils of varying texture. Communications in Soil Science & Plant
Analysis, 27 (9/10), 2079-2089.
Binet F. & Trehen P. (1992). Experimental Microcosm Study of the Role of Lumbricus Terrestris (Oligochatea: Lumbricadea) on Nitrogen Dynamics in
Cultivated Soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 13 (1), 39-42.
Boehm, M.J., Madden, L.V., Hoitink, H.A.J. 1993. Effect of organic matter
decomposition level on bacterial species diversity and decomposition inrelationship to Pythium damping-off severity. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 59, 4171-4179.
Bohlen, P.J. Edwards, C.A. (1995). Earthworm Effects on N Dynamics and Soil
Respiration in Microcosms Receiving Organic and Inorganic Nutrients. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 27 (3), 341-348.
Borowski, E. (1995). Response of tomatoes to NO3-N or NH4-N applied to sand,
loam, and soil substrate. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, 3,
111-118.
Buck, J., Walcott, R. & Beuchat., L R. 2003. Recent trends in microbiological safetyof fruits and vegetables, in Plant Health Progress.
Cantanazaro, C.J., Williams, K.A., Sauve, R.J. (1998). Slow release versus water
soluble fertilization affects nutrient leaching and growth of potted
chrysanthemum. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21 (5), 1025-1036.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 18/24
Chan, K.Y., Heenan, D.P. (1995). Occurrence of enchytraeid worms and some
properties of their casts in an Australian soil under cropping. Australian
Journal of Soil Research, 33 (4), 651-657.
Chaoui, I.H., Zibilske, L.M., Ohno, S. (2003). Effect of earthworm casts andcompost on microbial activity and plant nutrient uptake. Soil Biol. And
Biochem., 35, 295-302.
Chen, W., Hoitink, H. A. J., Madden, L. V. (1988). Microbial activity and biomass
in container media for predicting suppressiveness to damping-off caused byPythium ultimum. Phytopathology, 78, 1447-1450.
Choi, J.M. Nelson, P.V. (1996). Developing a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer from
organic sources. I. Using nonviable bacteria. Journal of the American Societyfor Horticultural Science, 121 (4), 629-633.
Chung, Y.R., Hoitink, H.A.H., Lipps, P.E. (1988). Interactions between organic-matter decomposition level and soilborne disease severity. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment, 24, 183-193.
Cox, D. A. (1993). Reducing nitrogen leaching-losses from containerized plants: the
effectiveness of controlled-release fertilizers. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 16,
533-545.
Daniel, O. Anderson, J.M. (1992). Microbial Biomass and Activity in Contrasting
Soil Materials after Passage Through the Gut of the Earthworm Lumbricus
Rubellus Hoffmeister. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 24 (5), 465-470.
Decaens, T., Rangel, A.F., Asakawa, N., Thomas, R.J. (1999). Carbon and nitrogen
dynamics in ageing earthworm casts in grasslands of the eastern plains ofColombia. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30 (1-2), 20-28.
Devliegher, W. & Verstraete, W. 1997. The effect of Lumbricus terrestris on soil in
relation to plant growth: effects of nutrient-enrichment processes (NEP) and
gut-associated processes (GAP). Soil-Biology-and-Biochemistry, 29(3/4),341-346.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 19/24
Eastman, B.R. (1999). Achieving Pathogen Stabilization Using Vermicomposting.
Biocycle, Nov. 1999, 62-64.
Edwards, C.A. (1995). Historical overview of vermicomposting. Biocycle, 36 (6),
56-58.
Edwards, C.A. and Bates, J.E. (1992). The use of earthworms in environmentalmanagement. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 14 (12): 1683-1689.
Finola, M., Rodrigues, C. and Beoletto, V. 1995. Gastrointestinal bacaeriology of
the earthworm Eisenia foetida grown in composted broiler litter. Rev.
Argent Microbiol., 27, 210-213.
Fragoso, C., Barois, I., Gonzales, C. Artega, C., Patron, J.C. (1993). Relationship between earthworms and soil organic matter levels in natural and managed
ecosystems in the Mexican tropics. Proceedings of an international
symposium on Soil Organic matter dynamics and the sustainability oftropical agriculture, Leuven, Belgium, 4-6 November.
Galli, E., Rosique, J.C., Tomati, D., Roig, A. (1992). Effect of humidified material
on plant metabolism. Proceedings of the 6th International meeting of the
International Humic substances society, 1992.
Haynes, R.J., Fraser, P.M., Tregurtha, R.J., Piercy, J.E. (1999). Size and activity ofthe microbial biomass and N,S and P availability in EW casts derived from
arable and pastoral soil and arable soil amended with pant residues.
Pedobiologia, 43 (6), 568-573.
Hidalgo, P. (1997). Study of auxins in earthworms and in media containing
earthworms castings as related to plant growth of marigold (Tagetes erecta)(Eisenia fetida andrei). MS. Mississippi State University.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 20/24
Hidalgo, P. 1999. Earthworm castings increase germination rate and seedling
development of cucumber / Pablo Hidalgo ... [et al .]. Mississippi State, MS :
Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station. 1 folded sheet (5 p.): ill. ; 28 cm. Research report / Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry
Experiment Station ; vol. 22, no. 6.
Hoitink, H., Boehm, M. & Hadar, Y. (1993). Mechanisms of soilborne plant
pathogens in compost-amended substrates. P. 601-621. IN: H. Hoitink and H.Keener (eds.). Science and Engineering of Composting. Renaissance
Publications, Worthington, OH.
Jordan, D., Bruce R.R. & Coleman, D.C. (1996). Nitrogen Availability to Grain
Sorghum from Organic and Inorganic Sources on Sandy and Clayey Soil
Surfaces in a Greenhouse Pot Study. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 21 (4),
271-276.
Lavelle, P., Melendez, G., Pashanasi, B., Schaefer, R. (1992). Nitrogen
mineralization and reorganization in casts of the geophagous tropical
earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Glossoscolecidae). Biology and Fertilityof Soils, 14 (1), 49-53.
Lui, S. X., Xiong, D. Z., Wu, D. B. 1991. Studies on the effect of earthworms on
the fertility of red-arid soil. Advances in management and conservation of
soil fauna, Proceedings of the 10th International Soil Zoology Colloquium,held at Banglador, India, August 7-13.
Mandelbaum, R., Hadar, Y. 1990. Effects of available carbon source on microbial
activity and suppression of Pythium aphanidermatum in compost and peat
container media. Phytopathology, 80 (9), 794-804.
Marinissen, J.C.Y. Dexter, A.R. (1990). Mechanisms of stabilization of earthworm
casts and artificial casts. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 9 (2), 163-167.
Martin, A. & Lavelle, P. (1992). Effect of Soil Organic Matter Quality on itsAssimilation by Millsonia Anomala, a Tropical Geophagous Earthworm.
Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 24, 1535,
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 21/24
McInerney, M. & Bolger, T. (2000). Temperature, wetting cycles and soil texture
effects on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in stabilized earthworm casts. Soil
Biology & Biochemistry, 32, 335-349.
Michel, F.C., Heimlich, J.E., Hoitink,H.A.J. Ohio State University
Extension Fact Sheet, Horticulture
and Crop Sciences Composting at
Home. COM-0001-99
Ndegwa, P.M., Thompson, S.A., Das, K.C., 1999. Effects of stocking density and
feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Biores. Technol. 71 (1), 5-1.
Ndegwa, P.M.; Thompson, S.A. 2000. Effects of C-to-N ratio on vermicompostingof biosolids. Bioresour-technol., 75 (1), 7-12.
O'Brien, T.A. & Barker, A.V. (1996). Evaluation of ammonium and soluble salts on
grass sod production in compost. I. Addition of ammonium or nitrate salts.
Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 27 (1/2), 57-76.
Orozco, F.H. Cegarra, J. Trujillo, L.M. Roig, A. (1996). Vermicomposting of coffee pulp using the earthworm Eisenia fetida: effects on C and N contents and the
availability of nutrients. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 22 (1/2), 162-166.
Parmelee, R.W. Crossley, D.A. Jr. (1988). Earthworm production and role in the
nitrogen cycle of a no-tillage agroecosystem on the Georgia piedmont.
Pedobiologia, 32 (5/6), 355-361.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 22/24
Pashanasi, B. Melendez, G. Szott, L. Lavelle, P. (1992). Effect of inoculation with
the endogeic earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Glossocolecidae) on N
availability, soil microbial biomass and the growth of three tropical fruit treeseedlings in a pot experiment. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 24 (12), 1655-
1659.
Rangel, A., Thomas, R. J., Jimenez, J.J., Decaens, T. (1999). Nitrogen dynamics
associated with earthworm casts of Martiodrilus carimaguensis Jimenez andMoreno in a Colombian savanna Oxisol. Pedobiologia, 43 (6), 557-560.
Ruz-Jerez, B.E. Ball, P.R. Tillman, R.W. (1992). Laboratory assessment of nutrient
release from a pasture soil receiving grass or clover residues, in the presence
or absence of Lumbricus rubellus or Eisenia fetida. Soil Biology &
Biochemistry, 24 (12), 1529-1534.
Saciragic, B., Dzelilovic, M. (1986). Effect of worm compost on soil fertility andyield of vegetable crops (cabbage leeks) and fodder sorghum. Agrohemija, 5-6, 343-351.
Santamaria-Romero-S; Ferrera-Cerrato-R; Almaraz-Suarez-JJ; Galvis-Spinola-A;
Barois-Boullard-I. 2001. Dynamics and relationships among
microorganisms, C-organic and N-total during composting andvermicomposting. Agrociencia-Montecillo, 35 (4), 377-384.
Scheu, S. (1993). cellulose and lignin decomposition in soils from different
ecosystems on limestone as affected by earthworm processing. Pedobiologia,
37, 167-177.
Schrader, S., Zhang, H. (1994). Earthworm casting: stabilization or destabilization ofsoil structure? 5th international symposium on earthworm ecology held in
Columbus, Ohio, USA, 5-9 July 1994.
Shipitalo, M.J. & Protz, R. (1989). Chemistry and micromorphology of aggregation
in earthworm casts. Geoderma, 45, 357-374.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 23/24
Shipitalo, M.J. (1987). Soil structure formation and stabilization by earthworms and
tillage effects on soil porosity. PhD University of Guelph Canada.
Sims, J.T. (1990). Nitrogen mineralization and elemental availability in soils
amended with cocomposted sewage sludge. Journal of EnvironmentalQuality, 19 (4), 669-675.
Stephens, P.M. & Davoren, C.W. (1997). Influence of the earthworms Aporrectodea
trapezoides and A. Rosea on the disease severity of Rhizoctonia solani on
subterreanean clover and ryegrass. Soil-biol-biochem, 29 (3/4), 511-516.
Stephens, P.M., Davoren, C.W., Ryder, M.H., Doube, B.M., Correll, R.L. (1994).Field evidence for reduced severity of Rhizoctonia bare-patch disease of
wheat, due to the presence of the earthworms Aporrectodea rosea andAporrectodea trapezoides. Soil-biol-biochem., 26 (11), 1495-1500.
Szczech, M. & Smolinska, U. 2001. Comparison of suppressiveness ofvermicomposts produced from animal manures and sewage sludge againstPhytophthora Breda de Haan var. nicotianae. Phytopath-Z, 149 (2), 77-82.
Szczech, M., Rondomanski, W., Brzeski, M.W., Smolinska,-U., Kotowski, J. (1993).
Suppressive effect of a commercial earthworm compost on some root
infecting pathogens of cabbage and tomato. Biol-agric-hortic., 10 (1), 47-52.
Tomati, U., Galli, E., Grappelli, A., Hard, J.S. (1994). Plant metabolism as
influenced by earthworm casts. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen
Zoologischen Museum and Institute, 89 (2), 179-185.
Tomati, U., Grapelli, A., Galli, E. (1987). The hormone-like effect of earthworm
casts on plant growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 5 (4), 288-294.
Villar, M.C. Beloso, M.C. Acea, M.J. Cabaneiro, A. Gonzalez-Prieto, S.J.Carballas, M. Diaz-Ravina, M. Carballas, T. (1993). Physical and chemical
characterization of four composted urban refuses. Bioresource Technology,
45 (2), 105-113.
8/13/2019 OVERVIEW OF EARTHWORM CASTS AND A COMPARISON WITH COMPOST
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/overview-of-earthworm-casts-and-a-comparison-with-compost 24/24
Vinceslas-Akpa, M. Loquet, M. (1997). Organic matter transformations in
lignocellulosic waste products composted or vermicomposted (Eisenia fetida
andrei): chemical analysis and 13C CPMAS NMR spectroscopy. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 29 (3/4), 751-758.
Zhang, H. Schrader, S. (1993). Earthworm effects on selected physical and chemical
properties of soil aggregates. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 15 (3), 229-234.
Zhao, S.W., Huang, F.Z. (1988). The nitrogen uptake efficiency from 15N labeled
chemical fertilizer in the presence of earthworm manure (cast). Advances inmanagement and conservation of soil fauna, Proceedings of the 10th
International Soil Zoology Colloquium, held at Banglador, India, August 7-
13.