Overview of FY 2011 CBIG Overview of FY 2011 CBIG Funding OptionsFunding Options
Jim EdwardChesapeake Bay Program
July 20, 2010
Summary• Under the strategy developed in response to EO
13508, Clean Water Act funds will be targeted beginning in FY 2011.
• 4 conference calls were held with the jurisdictions on 6/16, 6/24, 7/1 and 7/14 to discuss targeting options.
• All jurisdictions were represented at each conference call.
• A total of 5 funding formulas were presented as possible FY 2011 CBIG allocations during this process.
• Options 1-4 are based upon nutrient target loads and Option 5 is based upon the FY 2010 CBIG funding allocation formula.
Summary (continued)
• In addition, EPA solicited ideas for additional ways to calculate funding. No official proposals were provided.
• As part of these discussions, three questions regarding the issue of targeting priority watershed and/or practices were posed to each jurisdiction.
• After much debate, no consensus could be reached on which funding formula should be used to best target Clean Water Act funds.
Three Questions Posedto States
1. Are you in favor of geographic targeting?
2. Are you in favor of targeting funds with priority practices?
3. Could match be a way to consider targeting?
Five Funding OptionsFive Funding OptionsOption 1: 50/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to No Action
Option 2: 50/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP Loads
Option 3: 75/25 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP Loads
Option 4: Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year Period
Option 5: Current FY 2010 Distribution
Option 150/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to No ActionNitrogen Reduction = (2010 No Action Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2010 No Action Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)
State Base Funding
Targeted Funding
Total Amount of Additional Funds Needed to
Bring State Totals to FY 10Level
Signatory
Maryland $1,104,667 $1,291,120 $2,395,787
Virginia $1,104,667 $1,456,092 $2,560,759
Pennsylvania $1,104,667 $853,804 $1,958,470 $328,530
D.C. $500,000 $212,984 $712,984 $54,016
Total $3,814,000 $3,814,000 $7,628,000 $382,546
Non-Signatory
New York $250,000 $367,039 $617,039
Delaware $250,000 $201,727 $451,727 $48,273
West Virginia $250,000 $181,234 $431,234 $68,766
Total $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 $117,039
Total $4,564,000 $4,564,000 $9,128,000 $499,585
Option 2Option 250/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP LoadsNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)
State Base Funding Targeted Funding
Total Amount of Additional Funds Needed to Bring
State Totals to FY10 Level
Signatory
Maryland $1,104,667 $794,910 $1,899,577 $387,423
Virginia $1,104,667 $1,325,855 $2,430,522
Pennsylvania $1,104,667 $1,656,429 $2,761,095
D.C. $500,000 $36,806 $536,806 $230,194
Total $3,814,000 $3,814,000 $7,628,000 $617,617
Non-Signatory
New York $250,000 $395,705 $645,705
Delaware $250,000 $140,808 $390,808 $109,192
West Virginia $250,000 $213,487 $463,487 $36,513
Total $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 $145,705
Total $4,564,000 $4,564,000 $9,128,000 $763,322
Option 3Option 375/25 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP LoadsNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)
State Base Funding Targeted Funding
Total Amount of Additional
Funds Needed to Bring State
Totals to FY10 Level
Signatory
Maryland $1,707,000 $397,455 $2,104,455 $182,545
Virginia $1,707,000 $662,928 $2,369,928
Pennsylvania $1,707,000 $828,214 $2,535,214
D.C. $600,000 $18,403 $618,403 $148,597
Total $5,721,000 $1,907,000 $7,628,000 $331,142
Non-Signatory
New York $375,000 $197,853 $572,853
Delaware $375,000 $70,404 $445,404 $54,596
West Virginia $375,000 $106,743 $481,743 $18,257
Total $1,125,000 $375,000 $1,500,000 $72,853
Total $6,846,000 $2,282,000 $9,128,000 $403,995
Option 4Option 4Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)
FY 2011- 10%
StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total
Signatory
Maryland $2,055,067 $158,982 $2,214,049
Virginia $2,055,067 $265,171 $2,320,238
Pennsylvania $2,055,067 $331,286 $2,386,352
D.C. $700,000 $7,361 $707,361
Total $6,865,200 $762,800 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $450,000 $79,141 $529,141
Delaware $450,000 $28,162 $478,162
West Virginia $450,000 $42,697 $492,697
Total $1,350,000 $150,000 $1,500,000
Total$8,215,200 $912,800 $9,128,000
Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)FY 2012- 20%
StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total
Signatory
Maryland $1,817,467 $317,964 $2,135,431
Virginia $1,817,467 $530,342 $2,347,809
Pennsylvania $1,817,467 $662,571 $2,480,038
D.C. $650,000 $14,722 $664,722
Total $6,102,400 $1,525,600 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $400,000 $158,282 $558,282
Delaware $400,000 $56,323 $456,323
West Virginia $400,000 $85,395 $485,395
Total $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000
Total$7,302,400 $1,825,600 $9,128,000
Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Option 4Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)
FY 2013- 30%
StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total
Signatory
Maryland $1,579,867 $476,946 $2,056,813
Virginia $1,579,867 $795,513 $2,375,380
Pennsylvania $1,579,867 $993,857 $2,573,724
D.C. $600,000 $22,083 $622,083
Total $5,339,600 $2,288,400 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $350,000 $237,423 $587,423
Delaware $350,000 $84,485 $434,485
West Virginia $350,000 $128,092 $478,092
Total $1,050,000 $450,000 $1,500,000
Total$6,389,600 $2,738,400 $9,128,000
Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)FY 2014- 40%
StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total
Signatory
Maryland $1,342,267 $635,928 $1,978,195
Virginia $1,342,267 $1,060,684 $2,402,951
Pennsylvania $1,342,267 $1,325,143 $2,667,410
D.C. $550,000 $29,445 $579,445
Total $4,576,800 $3,051,200 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $300,000 $316,564 $616,564
Delaware $300,000 $112,647 $412,647
West Virginia $300,000 $170,789 $470,789
Total $900,000 $600,000 $1,500,000
Total$5,476,800 $3,651,200 $9,128,000
Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)FY 2015- 50%
StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total
Signatory
Maryland $1,104,667 $794,910 $1,899,577
Virginia $1,104,667 $1,325,855 $2,430,522
Pennsylvania $1,104,667 $1,656,429 $2,761,095
D.C. $500,000 $36,806 $536,806
Total $3,814,000 $3,814,000 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $250,000 $395,705 $645,705
Delaware $250,000 $140,808 $390,808
West Virginia $250,000 $213,487 $463,487
Total $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
Total$4,564,000 $4,564,000 $9,128,000
Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Five Year Summary for Option 4
StateFY 2011
TotalFY 2012
TotalFY 2013
TotalFY 2014
TotalFY 2015
Total
Signatory Maryland
$2,214,049 $2,135,431 $2,056,813 $1,978,195 $1,899,577
Virginia
$2,320,238 $2,347,809 $2,375,380 $2,402,951 $2,430,522
Pennsylvania
$2,386,352 $2,480,038 $2,573,724 $2,667,410 $2,761,095
D.C. $707,361 $664,722 $622,083 $579,445 $536,806
Total
$7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $529,141 $558,282 $587,423 $616,564 $645,705
Delaware $478,162 $456,323 $434,485 $412,647 $390,808
West Virginia $492,697 $485,395 $478,092 $470,789 $463,487
Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Total $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000
Option 5Option 5Current FY 2010 DistributionStates are required to document, in their Work Plans, which priority watersheds and/or priority practices are being targeted for implementation with these grant funds.
State Base Funding Targeted Funding Total
Signatory
Maryland N.A. N.A. $2,287,000
Virginia N.A. N.A. $2,287,000
Pennsylvania N.A. N.A. $2,287,000
D.C. N.A. N.A. $767,000
Total N.A. N.A. $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York N.A. N.A. $500,000
Delaware N.A. N.A. $500,000
West Virginia N.A. N.A. $500,000
Total N.A. N.A. $1,500,000
Total N.A. N.A. $9,128,000
Summary of Funding Summary of Funding OptionsOptions
Summary Comparison:
StateOption 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5
Signatory
Maryland $2,395,787 $1,899,577 $2,104,455 See AboveSummary Comparison;FY 2015 and on the same distribution as Option 2
$2,287,000
Virginia $2,560,759 $2,430,522 $2,369,928 $2,287,000
Pennsylvania $1,958,470 $2,761,095 $2,535,214 $2,287,000
D.C. $712,984 $536,806 $618,403 $767,000
Total $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000
Non-Signatory
New York $617,039 $645,705 $572,853 $500,000
Delaware $451,727 $390,808 $445,404 $500,000
West Virginia $431,234 $463,487 $481,743 $500,000
Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Total
$9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000
Summary Chart of States’ Option Selections
State First Choice Second Choice
VA Option 5 Option 1
MD Option 5 Option 1
PA Option 2* Option 4
DC Option 5 N/A
WV Option 5 N/A
DE Option 5 N/A
NY Tioga- Option 2*NYSDEC- Option 5
Tioga- Option 3
*Option 2 selected with the condition that EPA allocate additional funding so that no state is penalized by this formula.
Next Steps
•The Management Board will provide feedback regarding which funding option(s) it supports.
• CBPO Acting Director will brief Shawn Garvin, EPA Region 3 Administrator on the Management Board’s initial discussions and feedback.
• The draft FY 2011 Chesapeake Bay Program Grant and Cooperative Agreement Guidance will be shared with the jurisdictions for review and comment in mid- August.
Next Steps (continued)
• Comments from jurisdictions on the guidance will be due at the end of August/ beginning September.
• A funding option will be selected by EPA prior to issuing the final FY 2011 CBIG Grant Guidance.
Conclusion
• While no consensus could be reached, a majority of the jurisdictions prefer Option 5.
• EPA would like the Management Board’s opinion and feedback on the various funding options and approaches.