+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OWL_HobbsHandout

OWL_HobbsHandout

Date post: 24-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: gwen-goldfarb
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Robert E. Hobbs, MD CLEVELAND CLINIC Year • 1.1 million 1.1 million hospitalizations hospitalizations Patients in US (millions) 10.0 • Mortality is high Mortality is high 4.8 3.5 10 0 2 4 6 8 2006 Years 600 500 700 400 600 500 700 400 300 100 200 300 100 200 0 0 • 30 day readmission: 25% 30 day readmission: 25% • 30 day mortality: 10-22% 30 day mortality: 10-22% • Costs: $8,000 +/- Costs: $8,000 +/- • Mortality: 4-22% Mortality: 4-22% • Incidence: 1.1 million/year Incidence: 1.1 million/year
Popular Tags:
86
ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE Robert E. Hobbs, MD CLEVELAND CLINIC
Transcript
Page 1: OWL_HobbsHandout

ACUTEDECOMPENSATED

HEART FAILURERobert E. Hobbs, MD

CLEVELAND CLINIC

Page 2: OWL_HobbsHandout

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HEART FAILURE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HEART FAILURE

• 5 million Americans have 5 million Americans have HF; likely 10 million in 2037HF; likely 10 million in 2037

• 550,000 new cases annually550,000 new cases annually

• 1.1 million hospitalizations1.1 million hospitalizations

• Mortality is highMortality is high

• Sudden cardiac death is 6 to Sudden cardiac death is 6 to 9 times higher than normal9 times higher than normal

1991 2001 2037

3.54.8

10.0

0

2

4

6

8

10

Patie

nts

in U

S (m

illio

ns)

Year

American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2010 Update. Circulation 2010;121:e1-170.

Page 3: OWL_HobbsHandout

(United States: 1979-2006). Source: NHDS/NCHS and NHLBI.Note: Hospital discharges include people discharged alive, dead and status unknown.

HOSPITAL DISCHARGES FOR HEART HOSPITAL DISCHARGES FOR HEART FAILURE BY SEXFAILURE BY SEX

600

500

300

100

700Discharges in Thousands

1979 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000Years

20060

400

200

600

500

300

100

700Discharges in Thousands

1979 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000Years

20060

400

200

MalesFemales

Page 4: OWL_HobbsHandout

HF HOSPITALIZATIONSHF HOSPITALIZATIONS

• Incidence: 1.1 million/yearIncidence: 1.1 million/year

• Costs: $8,000 +/-Costs: $8,000 +/-

• Outcomes: poor longtermOutcomes: poor longterm

• Mortality: 4-22%Mortality: 4-22%

• 30 day mortality: 10-22%30 day mortality: 10-22%

• 30 day readmission: 25%30 day readmission: 25%

Page 5: OWL_HobbsHandout

HOSPITALIZATIONS HOSPITALIZATIONS ARE INCREASINGARE INCREASING

• Aging population (“Baby Boomers”)Aging population (“Baby Boomers”)

• Rising incidence of chronic heart failureRising incidence of chronic heart failure

• Improved outcomes: MI, CABS, stentingImproved outcomes: MI, CABS, stenting

• Inevitable progression of heart diseaseInevitable progression of heart disease

• Inadequate CHF treatment in hospital Inadequate CHF treatment in hospital

• Suboptimal education and followupSuboptimal education and followup

• Noncompliance with diet and drugsNoncompliance with diet and drugs

Page 6: OWL_HobbsHandout

HEART FAILURE COSTSHEART FAILURE COSTS

60.6%60.6%Inpatient careInpatient care

(n=1.1 M)(n=1.1 M)

38.6%38.6%Outpatient careOutpatient care(3.4 visits/year(3.4 visits/year

/patient)/patient)(n=3.4 M)(n=3.4 M)

0.7%0.7%TransplantsTransplants

LVADsLVADs(n=3 k)(n=3 k)

Page 7: OWL_HobbsHandout

DISTRIBUTION OF HOSPITAL COSTSDISTRIBUTION OF HOSPITAL COSTS

Medpar Data for Heart Failure

DRG 127DRG 127

Non-ICU Bed(35%)

ICU Bed(31%)

Pharmacy(9%)

Supplies(6%)

Laboratory(8%)

Other Therapy(5%)

Radiology (3%)

Other (3%)

Page 8: OWL_HobbsHandout

2008 NATIONAL AVERAGE2008 NATIONAL AVERAGEPER CASE FOR DRG 127PER CASE FOR DRG 127

• Hospital costs……………..$8250Hospital costs……………..$8250

• Amount reimbursed………$4989Amount reimbursed………$4989

• Net financial loss………....$3261Net financial loss………....$3261

CMS Discharge Database (MEDPAR)

Page 9: OWL_HobbsHandout

HOSPITALIZATION

Page 10: OWL_HobbsHandout

INITIAL POINT OF CAREINITIAL POINT OF CARE

Physician’s office 22%

Emergency Dept 78%

ADHERE 2006

Approximately 80% of ED visits for HF result in hospitalizations

Page 11: OWL_HobbsHandout

EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS FOR HEART FAILUREFOR HEART FAILURE

Initial Episode 21%

Repeat Visits 79%

Aghababian RV. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002;3(suppl 4):S3–S9.

Page 12: OWL_HobbsHandout

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILEDEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

• Mean age: 75 yearsMean age: 75 years

• 52% female52% female

• 72% hypertension72% hypertension

• 57% coronary disease57% coronary disease• 44% diabetes mellitus44% diabetes mellitus• Smoked 48%; active 13%Smoked 48%; active 13%

ADHERE 2006

Page 13: OWL_HobbsHandout

• Heart failure with congestionHeart failure with congestion

• Heart failure with hypertensionHeart failure with hypertension

• Acute pulmonary edemaAcute pulmonary edema

• Low output failure, shockLow output failure, shock

• High output heart failureHigh output heart failure

• Right sided heart failureRight sided heart failure

PRESENTATION OF ADHF

Page 14: OWL_HobbsHandout

HEART FAILURE PATIENTSHEART FAILURE PATIENTS

ABNORMALITY Systolic DiastolicABNORMALITY Systolic Diastolic

AGE Older ElderlyAGE Older Elderly

GENDER Male FemaleGENDER Male Female

BP Normal HighBP Normal High

CONGESTION Peripheral PulmonaryCONGESTION Peripheral Pulmonary

ONSET Gradual AcuteONSET Gradual Acute

GROUP 1 GROUP 2

Page 15: OWL_HobbsHandout

HF HOSPITALIZATIONSHF HOSPITALIZATIONS

• Prior heart failure……………76%Prior heart failure……………76%

• Hospitalized < 6 months…...33%Hospitalized < 6 months…...33%

• LVEF < 40%………..…………47%LVEF < 40%………..…………47%

• Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL……...39%Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL……...39%

ADHERE Registry 2006

Page 16: OWL_HobbsHandout

DIAGNOSIS

Page 17: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 18: OWL_HobbsHandout

CLINICAL INDECISION IN THE EDCLINICAL INDECISION IN THE EDPhysician Report on Clinical Probability of CHF

Pretest Probability of CHF (%)

McCullough PA et al. Circulation. 2002;106:416–422.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Num

ber o

f Cas

es

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Page 19: OWL_HobbsHandout

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSISDIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

• Pulmonary infectionPulmonary infection• Decompensated COPDDecompensated COPD• Asthma exacerbationAsthma exacerbation• Acute coronary syndromeAcute coronary syndrome• Pulmonary embolismPulmonary embolism• PneumothoraxPneumothorax• Obesity, anxiety, drugsObesity, anxiety, drugs

Page 20: OWL_HobbsHandout

BNP LEVELS OF PATIENTS DIAGNOSED BNP LEVELS OF PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITHOUT CHF, WITH BASELINE LEFT VENTRICULAR WITHOUT CHF, WITH BASELINE LEFT VENTRICULAR

DYSFUNCTION, AND WITH CHFDYSFUNCTION, AND WITH CHFM

ean

BN

P C

once

ntra

tion

(pg/

ml)

AsymptomaticLV Dysfunction

(n=14)

38 ± 4141 ± 31

1076 ± 138

No CHF(n=139)

CHF(n=97)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400 P < 0.001

Maisel A. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(2):379-85

Page 21: OWL_HobbsHandout

RAPID ASSESSMENT OF CHFRAPID ASSESSMENT OF CHF

Congestion at Rest

LowPerfusion

at Rest

No

No Yes

Yes

Warm & Dry Warm & Wet

Cold & WetCold & Dry

Signs/symptoms of congestion• Orthopnea/PND• JV distension• Ascites• Edema• Rales (rare in chronic)

Possible evidence of low perfusion• Narrow pulse pressure• Sleepy / obtunded• Low serum sodium

• Cool extremities• Hypotension • Renal dysfunction (one cause)

Stevenson LW. Eur J Heart Fail. 1999;1:251–257.

Page 22: OWL_HobbsHandout

ACUTE HF HOSPITALIZATIONACUTE HF HOSPITALIZATION

ED LOS………………..ED LOS……………….. 5 hours5 hours

Hosp LOS…………….Hosp LOS……………. 4.3 days4.3 days

ICU Admit…………….ICU Admit……………. ……20%……20%

ICU LOS………………ICU LOS……………… 2.5 days2.5 days

ADHERE 2006ADHERE 2006

Page 23: OWL_HobbsHandout

ACUTE HF HOSPITALIZATIONACUTE HF HOSPITALIZATION

Mortality…………………..4.1%Mortality…………………..4.1%

PA catheter……………….4.0%PA catheter……………….4.0%

Ventilator…………………4.8%Ventilator…………………4.8%

Dialysis……………………5.3%Dialysis……………………5.3%

CPR………………………..1.5%CPR………………………..1.5%

ADHERE 2006ADHERE 2006

Page 24: OWL_HobbsHandout

PREDICTORS OF DEATHPREDICTORS OF DEATHADHERE REGISTRYADHERE REGISTRY

• Elevated BUN (>43 mg/dL)Elevated BUN (>43 mg/dL)

• Elevated creatinine (2.75 mg/dL) Elevated creatinine (2.75 mg/dL)

• Low blood pressure (SBP<115)Low blood pressure (SBP<115)

Fonarow. JAMA 2005;293:572-80Fonarow. JAMA 2005;293:572-80

Page 25: OWL_HobbsHandout

MANAGEMENT

Page 26: OWL_HobbsHandout

JACC 2009;53:1343

Page 27: OWL_HobbsHandout

Crit Pathways Cardiol 2008;7:83-121

Page 28: OWL_HobbsHandout

• Only 15% of ADHF guidelines are Only 15% of ADHF guidelines are supported by randomized clinical trialssupported by randomized clinical trials

• Nearly all drug trials in ADHF failedNearly all drug trials in ADHF failed

• No drug given for ADHF has ever been No drug given for ADHF has ever been shown to improve longterm outcomesshown to improve longterm outcomes

• Readmissions and mortality are highReadmissions and mortality are high

PROBLEMS

Page 29: OWL_HobbsHandout

IV DIURETICSIV DIURETICS

Furosemide Furosemide 83%83%

Bumetanide 8%Bumetanide 8%

Torsemide 3%Torsemide 3%

None 6%None 6%

ADHERE 2006ADHERE 2006

Page 30: OWL_HobbsHandout

DIURETICSDIURETICS

• ““First-line” agents for HFFirst-line” agents for HF

• IV loop diuretic IV loop diuretic

• Rapidly control fluidRapidly control fluid

• Relieve congestionRelieve congestion

• Diuresis / natriuresisDiuresis / natriuresis

Page 31: OWL_HobbsHandout

DIURETICSDIURETICS

• Bolus therapy when dose Bolus therapy when dose is low (<160 mg daily)is low (<160 mg daily)

• Continuous infusion Continuous infusion when daily dose is highwhen daily dose is high

• Add thiazide; watch K+Add thiazide; watch K+

• Add spironolactoneAdd spironolactone

Page 32: OWL_HobbsHandout

DIURETIC PROBLEMSDIURETIC PROBLEMS

• KK++, Mg, Mg++++ excretion excretion

• Volume depletionVolume depletion

• HypotensionHypotension

• Pre-renal azotemiaPre-renal azotemia

renin, vasopressin, NErenin, vasopressin, NE

• Metabolic alkalosisMetabolic alkalosis

Page 33: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 34: OWL_HobbsHandout

ACE INHIBITORSACE INHIBITORS

• All ACEi probably are equalAll ACEi probably are equal

• Lisinopril, enalapril, captopril Lisinopril, enalapril, captopril studied in RCTs of studied in RCTs of chronicchronic systolic heart failuresystolic heart failure

• Therapy mandated at dischargeTherapy mandated at discharge

• ACEi costs are similarACEi costs are similar

Page 35: OWL_HobbsHandout

ANGIOTENSION RECEPTOR ANGIOTENSION RECEPTOR BLOCKERSBLOCKERS

• Probably similar efficacy to ACEiProbably similar efficacy to ACEi

• Fewer side-effects than ACEiFewer side-effects than ACEi

• ARB costs are higherARB costs are higher

• Losartan not FDA approved for HFLosartan not FDA approved for HF

• Valsartan reduces hospitalizationsValsartan reduces hospitalizations

• Candesartan Candesartan ↓ hosp / mortality↓ hosp / mortality

Page 36: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 37: OWL_HobbsHandout

BETA-BLOCKERSBETA-BLOCKERS

• Don’t discontinue beta-blockersDon’t discontinue beta-blockers

• Start beta-blocker when euvolemicStart beta-blocker when euvolemic

• Therapy mandated at dischargeTherapy mandated at discharge

• Plan outpatient uptitrationPlan outpatient uptitration

• Don’t use metoprolol tartrateDon’t use metoprolol tartrate

Page 38: OWL_HobbsHandout

IV VASOACTIVE MEDICATIONSIV VASOACTIVE MEDICATIONS

ADHERE 2006ADHERE 2006

• Nesiritide………...….12%Nesiritide………...….12%• Nitroglycerin…..…….9%Nitroglycerin…..…….9%• Dobutamine………….6%Dobutamine………….6%• Dopamine…………….6%Dopamine…………….6%• Milrinone……………..3%Milrinone……………..3%• Nitroprusside………..1%Nitroprusside………..1%

Page 39: OWL_HobbsHandout

IV VASODILATORSIV VASODILATORS

• NitroglycerinNitroglycerin

• NitroprussideNitroprusside

• NesiritideNesiritide

Page 40: OWL_HobbsHandout

VASODILATOR PATHWAYSVASODILATOR PATHWAYS

cGMP

VASODILATIONVASODILATION

NITRIC OXIDE(SGC)

NPR-A(pGC)

NITROGLYCERINNITROGLYCERINNITROPRUSSIDENITROPRUSSIDE

NATRIURETIC PEPTIDES:NATRIURETIC PEPTIDES:BNP, ANPBNP, ANP

SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL RELAXATION

Page 41: OWL_HobbsHandout

NITROGLYCERINNITROGLYCERIN

Low dose Venodilation*Low dose Venodilation*

High dose Arteriolar dilationHigh dose Arteriolar dilation

Hemodynamic effects

*Venodilation is the predominant effect

Page 42: OWL_HobbsHandout

NITROGLYCERIN DOSE AND CHANGE IN NITROGLYCERIN DOSE AND CHANGE IN PCWP DURING TREATMENT WITH NTGPCWP DURING TREATMENT WITH NTG

180160140120100

80604020

00 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

-5

-6

-7

-8

Time (hours)

Change in PCWP (mmHg)NTG dose (micrograms/min)

NTG

PCWP*

*

**

*

*

Elkayam. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:237-240

Page 43: OWL_HobbsHandout

NITROPRUSSIDENITROPRUSSIDE

• Potent IV vasodilating agentPotent IV vasodilating agent• Dilates arteries and veinsDilates arteries and veins• Decreases wedge pressureDecreases wedge pressure• Lowers intracardiac pressuresLowers intracardiac pressures• Rapidly lowers blood pressureRapidly lowers blood pressure• Increases cardiac outputIncreases cardiac output

Page 44: OWL_HobbsHandout

NITROPRUSSIDENITROPRUSSIDELIMITATIONSLIMITATIONS

• ICU: PA catheter, BPsICU: PA catheter, BPs• Difficult titration (Difficult titration (BP)BP)• Light sensitivityLight sensitivity• Coronary “steal” syndrome?Coronary “steal” syndrome?• ““Rebound” phenomenon?Rebound” phenomenon?• Thiocyanate toxicityThiocyanate toxicity

Page 45: OWL_HobbsHandout

NESIRITIDENESIRITIDE

• Balanced vasodilatorBalanced vasodilator

• No inotropic effectsNo inotropic effects

• No chronotropic effectsNo chronotropic effects

• Lusitropic propertiesLusitropic properties

• Not pro-arrhythmicNot pro-arrhythmic

Page 46: OWL_HobbsHandout

VASODILATOR PATHWAYSVASODILATOR PATHWAYS

cGMP

VASODILATIONVASODILATION

NITRIC OXIDE(SGC)

NPR-A(pGC)

NITROGLYCERINNITROGLYCERINNITROPRUSSIDENITROPRUSSIDE

NATRIURETIC PEPTIDES:NATRIURETIC PEPTIDES:BNP, ANPBNP, ANP

SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL RELAXATION

Page 47: OWL_HobbsHandout

NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE RECEPTORNATRIURETIC PEPTIDE RECEPTOREndothelin and

Angiotensin Converting

Enzyme

K+

cGMP - PK

cGMPRA RB

GC GC

GTP

RC

G G G G- +

Natriuretic Degrading Surface Enzyme NEP

24.11ANP + BNP CNP

ATPcAMP

PDE

Biologic Effects Relaxation

C

Endothelin andAngiotensin Converting

Enzyme

K+

cGMP - PK

cGMP

GTP

Natriuretic Degrading Surface Enzyme NEP

24.11ANP + BNP CNP

ATPcAMP

Biologic Effects Relaxation

cGMP

Chem Proc Assoc Am Physicians 111:5, 1999

Page 48: OWL_HobbsHandout

NESIRITIDE DOSINGNESIRITIDE DOSING

BolusBolus 2 µg / kg (60 sec)2 µg / kg (60 sec)

InfusionInfusion 0.01 µg / kg / min0.01 µg / kg / min

Page 49: OWL_HobbsHandout

ASCEND STUDY ASCEND STUDY

• 7000 patients worldwide7000 patients worldwide

• Decompensated CHFDecompensated CHF

• Fluid overloadedFluid overloaded

• Dyspnea (rest or min ADL)Dyspnea (rest or min ADL)

• Elevated filling pressuresElevated filling pressures

Page 50: OWL_HobbsHandout

INOTROPIC THERAPYINOTROPIC THERAPY

• Routine use not indicatedRoutine use not indicated

• Hypotensive HF; shock: okHypotensive HF; shock: ok

• Bridge to transplant: okBridge to transplant: ok

• Palliative therapy: okPalliative therapy: ok

• Outpatient infusions: noOutpatient infusions: no

Felker. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 393

Page 51: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 52: OWL_HobbsHandout

ULTRAFILTRATION “SCUF”

Page 53: OWL_HobbsHandout

ULTRAFILTRATIONULTRAFILTRATION

• Removes sodium and waterRemoves sodium and water

• Greater weight loss than diureticsGreater weight loss than diuretics

• Avoids intravascular volume depletion, Avoids intravascular volume depletion, electrolyte imbalanceelectrolyte imbalance

• Expensive therapyExpensive therapy

• Useful for anasarca, cardiorenalUseful for anasarca, cardiorenalBiogen Idec

Page 54: OWL_HobbsHandout

HEARTMATE II LVAD

Page 55: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 56: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 57: OWL_HobbsHandout
Page 58: OWL_HobbsHandout

DISCHARGE

Page 59: OWL_HobbsHandout

chart, n = number of patients with both baseline and discharge weight; percentage calculated based on total patients in corresponding population. Patients without baseline or discharge weight omitted from histogram calculations

CHANGE IN WEIGHT FROM ADMISSION CHANGE IN WEIGHT FROM ADMISSION TO DISCHARGETO DISCHARGE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Enro

lled

Dis

char

ges

(%)

(<-20) (-20 to -15) (-15 to -10) (-10 to -5) (-5 to 0) (0 to 5) (5 to 10) (>10)

Change in Weight (lb)

*Who were discharged home (including home with additional and/or outpatient care)

7 6

13

24

11

23

33

ADHERE

Page 60: OWL_HobbsHandout

PATIENT EDUCATIONPATIENT EDUCATION

DietDiet Daily weights Daily weights

FluidsFluids BP Monitoring BP Monitoring

ACE/BBACE/BB Smoking Cessation Smoking Cessation

ActivitiesActivities Who to call for sx Who to call for sx

ExerciseExercise Follow-up visit Follow-up visit

DOCUMENTATION

Page 61: OWL_HobbsHandout

DISPOSITIONDISPOSITION

HomeHome66%66%

HospiceHospice16%16%

Home + VN 9%Home + VN 9%

Deceased 4%Deceased 4%Hosp Trans 2%Hosp Trans 2%

Other 3%Other 3%

ADHERE ADHERE

Page 62: OWL_HobbsHandout

“I hope they fly”

Page 63: OWL_HobbsHandout

OUTCOMES OF ACUTELY OUTCOMES OF ACUTELY DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILUREDECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE

• Hospital readmissionsHospital readmissions– 25% at 30 days25% at 30 days11 – 50% at 6 months50% at 6 months11

• MortalityMortality– 11.6% at 30 days11.6% at 30 days22 – 33.1% at 12 months33.1% at 12 months22

– 50% at 5 years50% at 5 years11

1. Aghababian RV. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002;3(suppl 4):S3–S9.2. Jong P et al. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1689–1694.

Page 64: OWL_HobbsHandout

• Pathophysiology not understoodPathophysiology not understood

• ““One size fits all” therapyOne size fits all” therapy

• Different clinical presentationsDifferent clinical presentations

• Ignore co-morbid conditionsIgnore co-morbid conditions

• LVEF does not predict prognosisLVEF does not predict prognosis

• Core measures are inadequateCore measures are inadequate

HIGH READMISSION RATE

Page 65: OWL_HobbsHandout

30-DAY READMISSIONS30-DAY READMISSIONS

Page 66: OWL_HobbsHandout

CAUSES OF HOSPITAL READMISSION CAUSES OF HOSPITAL READMISSION WITH HEART FAILUREWITH HEART FAILURE

17%Other19%

Failure to SeekCare

16%Inappropriate Rx

Rx Noncompliance 24%

Diet Noncompliance24%

Vinson J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:1290-5

Page 67: OWL_HobbsHandout

RISK FACTORSRISK FACTORSFOR READMISSIONSFOR READMISSIONS

Frailty No familyFrailty No family

Dementia PovertyDementia Poverty

Uninsured Nursing homeUninsured Nursing home

Illiteracy ComplexityIlliteracy Complexity

Page 68: OWL_HobbsHandout

READMISSIONSREADMISSIONS

• Heart failure relatedHeart failure related

• Renal failure relatedRenal failure related

• Other co-morbidities Other co-morbidities

• Planned readmissionsPlanned readmissions

• End-of-life careEnd-of-life care

Page 69: OWL_HobbsHandout

PREVENTION OF ADMISSIONSPREVENTION OF ADMISSIONS

• Adequate discharge planningAdequate discharge planning

• Educate: meds, diet, fluids, etcEducate: meds, diet, fluids, etc

• Evidence based medicationsEvidence based medications

• Address co-morbiditiesAddress co-morbidities

• Telephone call 24-72 in hoursTelephone call 24-72 in hours

• Followup visit in 1 weekFollowup visit in 1 week

Page 70: OWL_HobbsHandout

WHAT WORKS?WHAT WORKS?

Pill minder NursePill minder Nurse

Scale TelephoneScale Telephone

BP cuff FamilyBP cuff Family

Pill chart ComputerPill chart Computer

Page 71: OWL_HobbsHandout

IT’S ALL ABOUT IT’S ALL ABOUT THE KIDNEYTHE KIDNEY

Page 72: OWL_HobbsHandout

FREQUENCY OF RENAL DYSFUNCTION FREQUENCY OF RENAL DYSFUNCTION IN 88,075 ADMISSIONSIN 88,075 ADMISSIONS

Heywood JT, ADHERE data as of 8/2004: 88,075 admissions with complete information.

Renal Failure<15

Renal Failure<15

60

40

20

10

70

%

Nml GFR>90eGFR (mL/min)

0

50

30

Mild60 - 89

Moderate30 - 59

Severe15 - 29

60

40

20

10

70

%

Nml GFR>90eGFR (mL/min)

0

50

30

Mild60 - 89

Moderate30 - 59

Severe15 - 29

MalesFemales

Page 73: OWL_HobbsHandout

WORSENING RENAL FUNCTIONWORSENING RENAL FUNCTION

•30% patients with ADHF30% patients with ADHF

•Longer hospital stayLonger hospital stay

•Higher hospital costsHigher hospital costs

•Higher in-hospital mortalityHigher in-hospital mortality

•More readmissionsMore readmissions

Biogen Idec

Page 74: OWL_HobbsHandout

WHEN CREATININE RISESWHEN CREATININE RISES

•Patient can’t go homePatient can’t go home

•Diuretics held or decreasedDiuretics held or decreased

•ACE and ARB’s heldACE and ARB’s held

•Tests and procedures delayedTests and procedures delayed

•To ICU for PA catheterTo ICU for PA catheter

•Inotroptes may be initiatedInotroptes may be initiatedBiogen Idec

Page 75: OWL_HobbsHandout

CARDIORENAL SYNDROMECARDIORENAL SYNDROME

WORSENINGWORSENINGRENAL FUNCTIONRENAL FUNCTION

HEART FAILUREHEART FAILURE

DIURETIC DIURETIC RESISTANCERESISTANCE

FLUIDFLUIDOVERLOADOVERLOAD

Page 76: OWL_HobbsHandout

DIURETIC RESISTANCEDIURETIC RESISTANCE

• Increase diuretic doseIncrease diuretic dose

• Different loop diureticDifferent loop diuretic

• Combination (loop + thiazide)Combination (loop + thiazide)

• Continuous IV infusionContinuous IV infusion

• UltrafiltrationUltrafiltration

• ParacentesisParacentesisBiogen Idec

Page 77: OWL_HobbsHandout

TRADITIONAL THEORY FORTRADITIONAL THEORY FORWORSENING RENAL FUNCTIONWORSENING RENAL FUNCTION

Low CardiacLow CardiacOutputOutput

VolumeVolumeDepletionDepletion

Loop diuretics

ADHF

Renal Dysfunction

Page 78: OWL_HobbsHandout

PREVALENCE OF WORSENING RENAL FUNCTION PREVALENCE OF WORSENING RENAL FUNCTION RELATED TO CVP, CI, SBP, AND PCWPRELATED TO CVP, CI, SBP, AND PCWP

Mullens W, et al. JACC 2009;53:589-596

Page 79: OWL_HobbsHandout

INCREASED INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSUREINCREASED INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE

•Normal pressure 5-7 mm HgNormal pressure 5-7 mm Hg

•CHF pressure 15-20 mm HgCHF pressure 15-20 mm Hg

•Prevalence: 60% in ADHFPrevalence: 60% in ADHF

•Visible ascites uncommonVisible ascites uncommon

•Abdominal compartment Abdominal compartment syndromesyndrome

Biogen Idec

Page 80: OWL_HobbsHandout

INCREASED CONGESTION (RA PRESSURE) INCREASED CONGESTION (RA PRESSURE) MAY IMPAIR TUBULAR FUNCTIONMAY IMPAIR TUBULAR FUNCTION

• Intracapsular pressureIntracapsular pressure• Peritubular pressurePeritubular pressure• Medullary ischemiaMedullary ischemia• Decreased GFR Decreased GFR • Tubular dysfunctionTubular dysfunction• Adenosine releaseAdenosine release• Activation of RAASActivation of RAAS

RA Pressure 5 mmHgRA Pressure 5 mmHg

RA or vena-caval/renal RA or vena-caval/renal vein pressure vein pressure (> 20-25 mmHg)(> 20-25 mmHg)

Biomarkers sensitive Biomarkers sensitive to subtle changes in to subtle changes in GFR; may be GFR; may be superior to serum Crsuperior to serum Cr

↑↑ NGAL – Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalinNGAL – Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalinMishra et al. 2005Mishra et al. 2005

↑↑ Cystatin_C, KIM-1Cystatin_C, KIM-1

CHFCHF

Page 81: OWL_HobbsHandout

VENOUS CONGESTIONVENOUS CONGESTION

• Only predictor of ARFOnly predictor of ARF

• Occurs days-weeks beforeOccurs days-weeks before

• Ascites not always present Ascites not always present

• Cytokines + neurohormonesCytokines + neurohormones

• Causes “renal tamponade”Causes “renal tamponade”

Page 82: OWL_HobbsHandout

CARDIORENAL SYNDROME CARDIORENAL SYNDROME NOT MECHANISMSNOT MECHANISMS

• Low cardiac outputLow cardiac output

• Low ejection fractionLow ejection fraction

• Low blood pressureLow blood pressure

• Elevated PCWPElevated PCWP

• Use of diureticsUse of diureticsBiogen Idec

Page 83: OWL_HobbsHandout

CARDIORENAL SYNDROME CARDIORENAL SYNDROME MECHANISMSMECHANISMS

• ↑ ↑ venous pressurevenous pressure

• ↑ ↑ renal vein pressurerenal vein pressure

• ↑ ↑ renal interstitial pressurerenal interstitial pressure

•↓ ↓ glomerular filtration rate glomerular filtration rate

•↓ ↓ sodium excretionsodium excretion

Biogen Idec

Page 84: OWL_HobbsHandout

““CONGESTIVE KIDNEY FAILURE”CONGESTIVE KIDNEY FAILURE”

Elevated CVPElevated CVP

RenalRenalDysfunctionDysfunction

↑ Renal veinpressure

Page 85: OWL_HobbsHandout

SUMMARY

Page 86: OWL_HobbsHandout